296:. I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources. It's not like Dick van Patten and Richard Roundtree are obscure actors. If reliable sources don't discuss this as part of their filmography, then we really don't have anything to say. Given the cast and the claimed awards, it's a bit odd that we're having so much trouble finding independent, reliable sources. If there are sources available for this, I agree that we'd be better starting off from scratch. There's too much promotion and poor sourcing.
206:
related article. Like the others, this makes grandiose claims yet a search provides nothing to show that this film is actually noteworthy. This is extremely sketch when you take into consideration that the article claims that the broadcast of this show won the film studio four Emmys. There's actually
225:
that don't actually mention the film, and other links that just so happen to not have links in the article - meaning that we cannot verify them. These unverifiable sources should be considered immediately suspect and quite possibly fake or unusable, given that the other articles have listed sources
229:
If by some chance this film does have sources out there, there's no salvaging this article and it'd be far better off to TNT this and start from scratch if that is ever a possibility, especially given that there are concerns of sockpuppetry amidst the other issues.
215:, but gives little information otherwise. I searched using Highbeam and couldn't find anything either and they usually collect news stories from the 90s, especially from outlets that would have recorded Emmy award ceremonies, even if they're regional.
171:
211:, let alone that it won or was even nominated for an award of this caliber. Even if the Emmys were regional, there'd be some sort of record out there for this film. The best I could find for this was
218:
Now granted, this released in 1999/2000, but if something is nationally broadcast and won several awards, there's going to be some sort of records out there to verify that this existed.
165:
124:
212:
131:
97:
92:
101:
84:
221:
When it comes to the sources in the article, the issues here are similar to the other articles. There are plenty of primary sources, links like
186:
153:
17:
342:
322:
305:
288:
267:
241:
147:
66:
143:
361:
40:
193:
301:
263:
331:
88:
60:
159:
80:
72:
334:. Didn't we make it through the Y2K crises 15 years ago? If we didn't how is it that we are editing here?
357:
297:
234:
36:
339:
315:
284:
203:
179:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
356:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
276:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
231:
226:
from outlets that either don't seem to exist or has never written an article about Chaney.
335:
280:
259:
251:
222:
118:
255:
350:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
275:
per nom, these Chaney articles are looking more like a
114:
110:
106:
178:
207:
no real coverage out there to even confirm that this
192:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
364:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
343:05:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
330:as another piece of piece of
323:03:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
306:03:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
289:00:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
268:00:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
242:00:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
67:07:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
254:as explained by nom above.
381:
353:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
279:than anything else.
81:Y2K β World in Crisis
73:Y2K β World in Crisis
372:
355:
332:WP:SELFPROMOTION
320:
318:
298:NinjaRobotPirate
238:
197:
196:
182:
134:
122:
104:
63:
34:
380:
379:
375:
374:
373:
371:
370:
369:
368:
362:deletion review
351:
316:
314:
236:
202:Here's another
139:
130:
95:
79:
76:
65:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
378:
376:
367:
366:
346:
345:
325:
317:Rhododendrites
308:
291:
270:
213:this book note
200:
199:
136:
75:
70:
59:
57:The Bushranger
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
377:
365:
363:
359:
354:
348:
347:
344:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
324:
319:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:verifiability
249:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
239:
233:
227:
224:
219:
216:
214:
210:
205:
204:Warren Chaney
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
133:
129:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
62:One ping only
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
352:
349:
327:
313:per above β
310:
293:
272:
250:per lack of
247:
235:
228:
220:
217:
208:
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
127:
49:
47:
31:
28:
232:Tokyogirl79
166:free images
358:talk page
336:MarnetteD
281:Dbrodbeck
37:talk page
360:or in a
223:this one
125:View log
39:or in a
277:WP:HOAX
264:contrib
237:(ｑββΏβｑ)
172:WPΒ refs
160:scholar
98:protect
93:history
54:WP:SNOW
328:Delete
311:Delete
294:Delete
273:Delete
248:Delete
144:Google
102:delete
50:delete
209:aired
187:JSTOR
148:books
132:Stats
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
340:Talk
302:talk
285:talk
260:talk
256:Erik
180:FENS
154:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
321:\\
266:)
194:TWL
123:β (
304:)
287:)
262:|
174:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
52:.
338:|
300:(
283:(
258:(
198:)
190:Β·
184:Β·
176:Β·
169:Β·
163:Β·
157:Β·
151:Β·
146:(
138:(
135:)
128:Β·
121:)
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.