Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/YTView - Knowledge

Source 📝

326:- Subject has no notability. The Huffington Post source is a blog piece; Knowledge does NOT accept blogs as reliable sources. The Daily Dot source has a very small mention -- again -- no evidence of notability. I would also like to mention that The Daily Dot news site is borderline acceptable as a reliable source here at Knowledge. None of the sources/references provided (which are unreliable), are about the subject, they are about the business of fake followers on social media. A small mention on one article does not constitute space for a Knowledge article. This article is not encyclopedic, and should be removed. Still wondering how it got accepted in the first place.. 268:
I apologize if my assessment was incorrect. I often work on building articles of borderline notability and I can recognize and respect skill at squeezing the most out of reliable sources, but I do still favor deletion of this article.
197:
This article does cite a number of reliable sources that devote space to this website, but they were most likely written on behalf of the PR person for this website who also is probably responsible for this article.
405:
SBwire, or any "press release" article, is not considered a reliable source on Knowledge. Also, none of those sources are about the subject, only mere mentions. These news sources would fit perfectly on the
166: 119: 215: 160: 375: 360: 126: 388:
in order to warrant its own article, but the coverage on its services and impact on social networking is there and significant.
369: 17: 372: 309:- Knowledge is not a company directory. Merely being (allegedly) connected with something notable does not infer notability. 242:: Sorry but I do not have any link with the subject, I have been getting information for weeks now, though about doing a 181: 148: 92: 87: 475: 96: 40: 296: 79: 366: 450: 407: 255: 471: 429: 331: 142: 36: 291: 274: 203: 174: 138: 363: 314: 83: 57: 454: 433: 396: 335: 318: 301: 278: 259: 231: 207: 61: 446: 251: 188: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
470:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
425: 378: 327: 75: 67: 356: 352: 344: 243: 270: 224: 199: 246:
but decided to post as an article directly since it has reliable sources. Accusing of
442: 421: 411: 348: 310: 247: 53: 154: 424:
here with the subject editing his own article, admins need to take a look at this.
113: 389: 355:. There does appear to be sources that discuss this company in-depth (I found 290:
for now at best as this is still questionable for the applicable notability.
219: 445:
involved, since if it has, I would have clarified it and/or state it.
359:) and its services and impact on social media and popularity (See 464:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
380:). I, however, am iffy on whether or not there's enough 109: 105: 101: 173: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 478:). No further edits should be made to this page. 216:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 187: 8: 214:Note: This debate has been included in the 414:mentioned, this is not a company directory. 213: 420:I'm also beginning to believe there is a 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 455:23:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 434:05:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC) 397:03:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC) 336:02:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC) 319:09:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 302:02:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 279:09:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC) 260:01:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 232:00:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 208:00:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 62:02:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC) 495: 250:I find it very insulting. 467:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 408:Social media marketing 382:significant coverage 343:or redirect with/to 234: 228: 486: 469: 393: 299: 294: 229: 226: 222: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 494: 493: 489: 488: 487: 485: 484: 483: 482: 476:deletion review 465: 391: 384:on the company 345:Viral marketing 297: 292: 225: 220: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 492: 490: 481: 480: 460: 459: 458: 457: 418: 417: 416: 415: 410:article. Like 400: 399: 338: 321: 304: 293:SwisterTwister 284: 283: 282: 281: 263: 262: 236: 235: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 491: 479: 477: 473: 468: 462: 461: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 431: 427: 423: 413: 409: 404: 403: 402: 401: 398: 395: 394: 387: 383: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 364: 361: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 339: 337: 333: 329: 325: 322: 320: 316: 312: 308: 305: 303: 300: 295: 289: 286: 285: 280: 276: 272: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 238: 237: 233: 230: 223: 217: 212: 211: 210: 209: 205: 201: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 466: 463: 447:OGfromtheGut 441:There is no 419: 390: 385: 381: 340: 323: 306: 287: 252:OGfromtheGut 239: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 49: 47: 31: 28: 426:Scorpion293 328:Scorpion293 161:free images 472:talk page 271:Antrocent 200:Antrocent 37:talk page 474:or in a 412:Shritwod 392:~Oshwah~ 357:this one 353:WP:NCORP 311:Shritwod 244:WP:DRAFT 120:View log 54:MelanieN 39:or in a 240:Comment 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 443:WP:COI 422:WP:COI 386:itself 349:WP:GNG 347:- per 324:Delete 307:Delete 288:Delete 248:WP:COI 139:Google 97:delete 76:YTView 68:YTView 50:delete 341:Merge 221:/wiae 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 451:talk 430:talk 351:and 332:talk 315:talk 298:talk 256:talk 227:/tlk 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 189:TWL 118:– ( 52:. 453:) 432:) 377:, 374:, 371:, 368:, 365:, 362:, 334:) 317:) 277:) 275:♫♬ 258:) 218:. 206:) 204:♫♬ 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 449:( 428:( 330:( 313:( 273:( 254:( 202:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
MelanieN
talk
02:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
YTView
YTView
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Antrocent
♫♬

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.