358:
process. External links are indeed sources, and they did to a degree support the claims made in the article; I can confirm that they made finding other sources easy and quick. On foreign sources, English
Knowledge (XXG) is worldwide and there is no prejudice in favour of sources written in English, though there are some here. Finally, I repeat (in the unlikely event that any other editors who think that "sourced" means "with little numbers already in the article" are reading this) that notability depends on the existence of sources, not whether editors have bothered to add them to an article, or indeed to place them inline as is convenient for everybody. Due diligence is required before going to AfD; this may mean consulting with Swedish speakers to find out whether a subject is notable.
303:
organization. 3) He received coverage in
Swedish national newspapers such as Svenska Dagbladet as well as church sources. 4) Notability depends on external sources, not on how well or badly an article is documented with such sources. In this case Nom failed even to notice the sources listed in the article, let alone look for others, most of which are in Swedish. The general point is that it is essential before nominating to see whether the topic can be sourced; it is not enough to assume that a poorly-sourced article is not notable.
322:
the article, there were zero sources. What you refer to as "three sources" are actually external links, mostly associated with the subject itself. I am well aware that sourcing may be available on non-English speaking newspapers but I found nothing in a "quick" (emphasis on "quick") Google search. If
302:
1) The article is not unsourced, there are 3 links at the bottom. 2) Not done anything notable: he is correctly stated to be the author of the (controversial) Priest's
Declaration (against homosexual partnerships) of 2005, as well as a leading traditionalist and chair of a Swedish national church
357:
Thank you for your admirably civil reply. I have added 11 representative sources (there are more) to the article, but I must emphasize that this is not a necessary part of defending the article, nor of AfD policy in general. Your reply, I am sorry to say, betrays a misunderstanding of the AfD
175:
399:-- While this article has a lot of redlinks, it is about a Swedish subject. The Swedish WP has an article on him, which has rather fewer redlinks: our Swedish colleagues seem to think him notable.
128:
376:
276:
252:
169:
323:
the Priest's
Declaration was covered widely in Swedish newspapers and commented on by politicians by all means provide such evidence and add it to the article.
135:
206:
Does not seem to have done anything notable. A quick Google search does not turn up anything obvious. The article is totally unsourced. Fails
17:
346:
330:
240:
216:
101:
96:
105:
190:
157:
88:
444:
40:
384:
151:
404:
363:
308:
380:
286:
262:
440:
343:
327:
237:
213:
147:
36:
425:
408:
388:
367:
349:
333:
312:
292:
268:
243:
219:
70:
281:
257:
197:
183:
400:
359:
304:
230:
63:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
55:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
421:
340:
324:
234:
210:
92:
226:
207:
163:
60:
122:
417:
84:
76:
225:
I am satisfied by the article now, and am convinced that it passes
433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
339:
I have left a comment at
Wikiproject Sweden regarding this.
319:
118:
114:
110:
182:
196:
377:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
447:). No further edits should be made to this page.
416:- AfD is not a clean-up service. per WP:GNG.--
8:
375:Note: This debate has been included in the
275:Note: This debate has been included in the
251:Note: This debate has been included in the
277:list of Sweden-related deletion discussions
253:list of People-related deletion discussions
374:
274:
250:
229:. I withdraw the nomination. Thanks to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
426:21:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
409:19:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
389:13:29, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
368:12:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
350:12:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
334:12:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
313:11:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
293:11:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
269:11:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
244:23:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
220:10:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
71:22:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
464:
436:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
50:nomination withdrawn
391:
381:Shawn in Montreal
295:
271:
59:
56:non-admin closure
455:
438:
291:
289:
284:
267:
265:
260:
233:for their work.
201:
200:
186:
138:
126:
108:
68:
53:
34:
463:
462:
458:
457:
456:
454:
453:
452:
451:
445:deletion review
434:
287:
282:
280:
263:
258:
256:
143:
134:
99:
83:
80:
64:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
461:
459:
450:
449:
429:
428:
411:
393:
392:
372:
371:
370:
337:
336:
318:At the time I
297:
296:
272:
247:
246:
204:
203:
140:
79:
74:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
460:
448:
446:
442:
437:
431:
430:
427:
423:
419:
415:
412:
410:
406:
402:
401:Peterkingiron
398:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:Chiswick Chap
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
348:
345:
342:
335:
332:
329:
326:
321:
317:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
305:Chiswick Chap
301:
294:
290:
285:
278:
273:
270:
266:
261:
254:
249:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
232:
231:Chiswick Chap
228:
224:
223:
222:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
145:Find sources:
141:
137:
133:
130:
124:
120:
116:
112:
107:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:
78:
75:
73:
72:
69:
67:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
435:
432:
413:
396:
338:
299:
298:
205:
193:
187:
179:
172:
166:
160:
154:
144:
131:
65:
49:
47:
31:
28:
341:Kingsindian
325:Kingsindian
235:Kingsindian
211:Kingsindian
170:free images
85:Yngve Kalin
77:Yngve Kalin
441:talk page
320:nominated
37:talk page
443:or in a
129:View log
39:or in a
176:WP refs
164:scholar
102:protect
97:history
418:BabbaQ
227:WP:GNG
208:WP:GNG
148:Google
106:delete
288:Talk
264:Talk
191:JSTOR
152:books
136:Stats
123:views
115:watch
111:links
16:<
422:talk
414:Keep
405:talk
397:Keep
385:talk
364:talk
309:talk
300:Keep
283:Musa
259:Musa
184:FENS
158:news
119:logs
93:talk
89:edit
61:ansh
198:TWL
127:– (
66:666
52:.
424:)
407:)
387:)
379:.
366:)
311:)
279:.
255:.
178:)
121:|
117:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
420:(
403:(
383:(
362:(
347:♚
344:♝
331:♚
328:♝
307:(
241:♚
238:♝
217:♚
214:♝
202:)
194:·
188:·
180:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
150:(
142:(
139:)
132:·
125:)
87:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.