608:. I’ll leave my keep vote for now since I think from a certain perspective the topic barely scrapes by in reaching “3 good sources or large-scale trivial coverage,” but I can understand why editors would vote delete as well. I suspect it might be notable in the relative near future, since newspapers seem mildly interested by the company’s partnerships with big corporations.
498:, I didn't notice it was a local section, my apologies. If you have it on hand, would you mind directing me to the guideline that clarifies the use of local sections on national papers? I haven't read that one in a while. However, these articles still look very significant to me, so I am confused by the second half of your argument:
441:
I have actually edited here for many years (don't judge an editor by their account/IP/age ;b ). You are of course more than welcome ot re-add the tag if you still feel it is necessary, though please note: 1) there is no point waiting for editor admission, as most COI editors are short-term and often
422:
A small comment about the COI tag as I see that you have just started editing a week back. We usually remove the tag when 2 things have been done: 1. A disclosure by the editor has been completed and 2. The promotional content has been removed. If both these steps have not been done, the tag is
528:
I'll look around for another source or two. The
Economic Times article hints to me there's a good chance of other significant coverage in sources not in English, so I'm still hesitant to throw the baby out with the bathwater on this one.
165:
118:
159:
400:
Did some wikifying. Also think I'll remove the COI tag, as there isn't much on the page left that could be polluted. Worth re-adding the tag if that editor becomes active on the page again.
240:
91:
86:
95:
78:
125:
220:
548:
503:
468:
382:. The others on the page are mostly press releases, but even if the press releases were removed and the content scrubbed, there would still be enough to pass
377:
308:
212:
356:
by a wide margin. Nothing else indicates why this is "notable either". This is a pretty good example if
Knowledge (XXG) being used a business listing. --
180:
442:
never reply, nor are they obligated to, and 2) what promotional material is left? I cleaned it carefully, and I thought I had left it simple facts.
147:
141:
511:, a national newspaper - I suppose you could argue this is a routine announcement of some sort, though to me it seems a proper article.
634:
617:
593:
560:
538:
486:
451:
432:
409:
395:
365:
344:
327:
318:
Many of the sources in the article are not reliable, and those that are do not offer any substantive coverage: just passing mentions.
284:
252:
232:
60:
17:
137:
280:
603:
187:
519:
514:
471:
380:
293:
82:
653:
40:
373:
There are currently some good sources linked on the page, with significant coverage in reputable Indian publications:
276:
551:
article had one word about the subject - or one sentence if I am a bit liberal. This is not significant coverage. --
153:
74:
66:
606:
599:
248:
228:
556:
482:
428:
361:
474:
461:
353:
200:
649:
340:
323:
304:
36:
268:
196:
496:
465:
374:
630:
173:
244:
224:
552:
478:
424:
357:
208:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
648:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
264:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
613:
534:
447:
405:
391:
336:
319:
383:
272:
626:
507:
589:
582:
the only sources are mention or advertorials, sucha s the one in New Indian
Express.
598:’’’Comment’’’ - Did another search, without much luck. I did find two mentions in ‘’
204:
54:
112:
609:
530:
443:
401:
387:
263:
It is a daycare center organization. Noting notable about it about centre.Fails
203:. No assertion of notability, Most sources that refer to the company fail RS.
602:’’, I’d say in the middle zone between trivial and semi-significant coverage:
473:
This is a 3 sentence routine news coverage. None of these help to satisfy
584:
467:
This is a local news article "cities section" and we discount these.
642:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
625:, the company does not appear to be notable, at least for now.
296:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
108:
104:
100:
172:
386:. Cleanup wouldn't be hard, the page is still small.
516:, you're right, this one is trivial and not helpful
302:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
186:
241:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
521:, again right, I missed that this one is trivial.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
656:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
423:supposed to be removed only by consensus. --
239:Note: This debate has been included in the
219:Note: This debate has been included in the
238:
221:list of India-related deletion discussions
218:
470:The coverage here is limited to 1 word.
460:As for your sources, these don't pass
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
65:
335:-- non notable day care center.
75:Your Kids 'R' Our Kids (YKROK)
67:Your Kids 'R' Our Kids (YKROK)
1:
635:14:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
61:20:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
673:
618:23:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
594:05:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
561:05:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
539:03:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
487:02:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
452:03:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
433:01:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
410:01:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
396:01:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
366:07:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
345:17:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
328:17:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
309:00:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
285:14:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
253:06:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
233:06:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
505:(coverage significant in
213:23:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
645:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
600:Daily News and Analysis
277:Pharaoh of the Wizards
495:Hmm. On this one
311:
255:
235:
664:
647:
307:
301:
299:
297:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
672:
671:
667:
666:
665:
663:
662:
661:
660:
654:deletion review
643:
352:Falls short of
312:
303:
292:
290:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
670:
668:
659:
658:
638:
637:
620:
596:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
549:Economic Times
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
517:
512:
508:Economic Times
490:
489:
457:
456:
455:
454:
436:
435:
415:
414:
413:
412:
368:
347:
330:
300:
289:
288:
287:
257:
256:
236:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
669:
657:
655:
651:
646:
640:
639:
636:
632:
628:
624:
621:
619:
615:
611:
607:
604:
601:
597:
595:
591:
587:
586:
581:
578:
577:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
536:
532:
527:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
509:
504:
502:
501:
500:
499:
497:
494:
493:
492:
491:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
466:
463:
459:
458:
453:
449:
445:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
375:
372:
369:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
313:
310:
306:
305:North America
298:
295:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
245:Coolabahapple
242:
237:
234:
230:
226:
225:Coolabahapple
222:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
644:
641:
622:
583:
579:
553:Lemongirl942
506:
479:Lemongirl942
475:WP:CORPDEPTH
462:WP:CORPDEPTH
425:Lemongirl942
370:
358:Lemongirl942
354:WP:CORPDEPTH
349:
332:
315:
291:
260:
201:WP:CORPDEPTH
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
337:K.e.coffman
269:WP:NOTPROMO
197:WP:NOTPROMO
160:free images
627:Tazerdadog
650:talk page
320:Vanamonde
37:talk page
652:or in a
294:Relisted
199:, fails
119:View log
39:or in a
580:Delete.
265:WP:CORP
205:MSJapan
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:MBisanz
623:Delete
610:Yvarta
605:, and
531:Yvarta
444:Yvarta
402:Yvarta
388:Yvarta
384:WP:GNG
350:Delete
333:Delete
316:Delete
273:WP:GNG
261:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
50:delete
590:talk
547:This
371:Keep.
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
631:talk
614:talk
557:talk
535:talk
483:talk
477:. --
448:talk
429:talk
406:talk
392:talk
362:talk
341:talk
324:talk
281:talk
271:and
249:talk
229:talk
209:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
585:DGG
188:TWL
117:– (
52:.
633:)
616:)
592:)
559:)
537:)
485:)
464:.
450:)
431:)
408:)
394:)
379:,
376:,
364:)
343:)
326:)
283:)
251:)
243:.
231:)
223:.
211:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
629:(
612:(
588:(
555:(
533:(
481:(
446:(
427:(
404:(
390:(
360:(
339:(
322:(
279:(
275:.
267:,
247:(
227:(
207:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.