290:- Wide citations are irrelevant. Going through the first page of those search results, I see three press releases and seven passing mentions a la "according to Yardi Matrix". How would that indicate notability? You haven't added any of those sources to the article in your cleanup efforts, likely because none of them provide useful information about Yardi. We need coverage of Yardi, not Yardi being cited in an article about something else. Regarding the estimate of revenues, firstly, 100,000 times 5,000 is 500 million, not 5 billion. Secondly, 606 of those employees are in Santa Barbara with the majority overseas, for example in India. Does your 100k estimate hold for all equally? Thirdly, we'll need independent sources for claims of grandeur, not our own conclusions based on rehashed press releases. If the company is all that big, someone other than the local business paper will have reported on it in some detail.
265:
312:
Sorry for math error, but a $ 500 million per year company is huge and is going to be notable, and even a $ 60 million per year company is big (suppose it is 600 employees x 100k each; you go ahead and start one if it is so easy :) ). Surely the article could exist as a list of Yardi products
239:. It's a major software company, but focused on real estate management, not some popular consumer game or whatever, so you haven't heard of it. The article mentions 5,000 employees, one indicator of size. I don't know what that corresponds to in financial terms, say 100k each =: -->
342:
where a company is deemed notable if it's widely cited, or if it has revenues of $ X million. Those citations by their very nature only mention Yardi in passing and thus do not constitute the significant coverage we need to establish that Yardi meets the notability criteria.
216:
establishes notability. I disagree. Many of those hits are Yardi ads in old magazines that Google has faithfully digitized. The three "for dummies" books were written by the same author who mostly engages in vague praise and advertises his use of Yardi on his
378:
the company. However, if it's use as widespread as the citations suggest, I imagine there should be sources discussing the Yardi directly. These are what is needed. (With-holding judgement to see if better sources can be found)
313:
alone; the multiple sources available refer to their various systems and the Yardi Matrix etc. What is meant by "wide citations"? If you intended to say that being widely cited is not relevant, then I do not agree. --
169:
122:
486:
as per the arguments put forward by Huon. Knowledge (XXG) is not the Yellow Pages nor a substitute for a company paying for advertising which is what this article looks like.
450:
577:
421:
163:
213:
129:
264:: The company is clearly notable ranking high in the Forbes Cloud 100 list. Yardi Matrix is widely cited as a major source of industry activity
204:
puff piece not based on reliable secondary sources. None of the secondary sources given in the article cover Yardi in any detail. When I
268:
17:
95:
90:
99:
82:
184:
324:
251:
151:
503:
397:
609:
40:
482:
I too held off to see if any of the Keep !voters produced more references. They haven't. This article fails GNG and
145:
589:
568:
547:
524:
494:
471:
442:
412:
388:
352:
329:
303:
282:
256:
230:
141:
64:
218:
605:
408:
36:
191:
267:. Google Scholar shows dozens of results too, mostly in the Journal of Property Management from the
177:
564:
543:
467:
438:
384:
86:
483:
585:
319:
277:
246:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
604:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
556:
335:
205:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
555:
besides name checking with Forbes, there's no significant coverage of this company to pass
339:
201:
157:
515:
348:
299:
226:
221:. None of that is particularly helpful for writing a neutral, well-referenced article.
55:
560:
539:
487:
454:
425:
380:
78:
70:
581:
314:
272:
241:
209:
116:
535:
367:
344:
295:
222:
598:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
506:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
400:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
112:
108:
104:
176:
512:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
406:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
190:
374:a company is not the same thing as those sources
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
612:). No further edits should be made to this page.
212:de-prodded it without improvement but said that
451:list of California-related deletion discussions
578:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
422:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
576:Note: This debate has been included in the
449:Note: This debate has been included in the
420:Note: This debate has been included in the
575:
448:
419:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
269:Institute of Real Estate Management
271:, which is what you would expect.
24:
334:Please point me to the parts of
240:a 5 billion dollar company? --
1:
472:19:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
443:19:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
413:07:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
389:22:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
353:23:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
330:22:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
304:14:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
283:05:32, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
257:05:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
231:04:20, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
590:00:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
569:08:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
548:14:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
525:07:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
495:17:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
65:17:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
294:would indicate notability.
629:
601:Please do not modify it.
214:this Google Books search
32:Please do not modify it.
200:This is a borderline-
219:professional website
592:
527:
523:
474:
445:
415:
281:
63:
620:
603:
522:
520:
513:
511:
509:
507:
492:
462:
460:
433:
431:
411:
405:
403:
401:
327:
322:
317:
275:
254:
249:
244:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
628:
627:
623:
622:
621:
619:
618:
617:
616:
610:deletion review
599:
528:
516:
514:
502:
500:
488:
458:
457:
429:
428:
416:
407:
396:
394:
325:
320:
315:
252:
247:
242:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
626:
624:
615:
614:
594:
593:
572:
571:
550:
510:
499:
498:
497:
476:
475:
446:
404:
393:
392:
391:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
307:
306:
285:
259:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
625:
613:
611:
607:
602:
596:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
574:
573:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
549:
545:
541:
538:'s comments.
537:
533:
530:
529:
526:
521:
519:
508:
505:
496:
493:
491:
485:
481:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
452:
447:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
423:
418:
417:
414:
410:
409:North America
402:
399:
390:
386:
382:
377:
373:
369:
366:- Good point
365:
362:
361:
354:
350:
346:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
328:
323:
318:
311:
310:
309:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
284:
279:
274:
270:
266:
263:
260:
258:
255:
250:
245:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
211:
208:the article,
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:Yardi Systems
76:
75:
72:
71:Yardi Systems
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
600:
597:
552:
531:
517:
501:
489:
479:
456:
455:
427:
426:
395:
375:
371:
363:
291:
287:
261:
236:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
490:-- HighKing
164:free images
540:~dom Kaos~
518:Sandstein
370:, sources
58:Sandstein
606:talk page
582:• Gene93k
37:talk page
608:or in a
561:Ammarpad
504:Relisted
484:WP:NCORP
398:Relisted
381:Dbsseven
376:covering
123:View log
39:or in a
557:WP:CORP
364:Waiting
336:WP:CORP
288:Comment
273:Toddst1
210:Toddst1
206:prodded
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
553:Delete
532:Delete
480:Delete
461:Thomas
432:Thomas
340:WP:GNG
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
372:using
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
586:talk
565:talk
544:talk
536:Huon
534:per
468:talk
439:talk
385:talk
368:Huon
349:talk
345:Huon
300:talk
296:Huon
292:That
278:talk
262:Keep
237:Keep
227:talk
223:Huon
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
559:. –
338:or
321:ncr
248:ncr
202:G11
192:TWL
121:– (
588:)
580:.
567:)
546:)
470:)
453:.
441:)
424:.
387:)
351:)
326:am
316:do
302:)
253:am
243:do
229:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
584:(
563:(
542:(
466:(
459:C
437:(
430:C
383:(
347:(
298:(
280:)
276:(
225:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.