268:. However it is highly unlikely that it would be written about by journalist of big media as the application lacks the required audience to be profitable to publish in a dead-tree magazine simply because is it a Linux application. I believe that the application has gained a high enough notability by the communities of people which uses a Linux distribution that has a 'keep it simple' philosophy such as Archlinux, Slackware, etc. to validate for an article on wikipedia. I added third party references which shows that the application has indeed been noticed by people in the Linux communities and removed the delete request due to lack of notability/reference. However
291:
I took it here because I still think that it's non-notable software. When it was deleted as spam, it was clearly advertising and POV material. It doesn't have to be long to be spam. For example, an article that states that John Doe is the best runner that has ever lived and has won every race he ever
272:
was not satisfied and added a delete due to spam tag. The article is still in its very inception(I am slow) and at the time of deletion the article had two sentences, of which one was entirely factual and the other was factual but written in an advertising fashion. One administrator saw fit to delete
350:
an indiscriminate collection of all information out there. Your argument on Evince doesn't hold because Evince gains notability due to being part of the GNOME project and inclusion in well-known Linux distributions such as Ubuntu. -
292:
entered is spam. You're taking this as some sort of attack on you. It's nothing against you, but you chose a poor subject to write about. As for references, you have chosen one listing on Linux and another that is in violation of
242:. As a side note I cannot see any personal attacks and the author seem to have a long history with wikipedia (more than 3000 contributions). The software though is in preliminary stage and probable not qualify for an article yet.
263:
nominating the article for deletion has been out for this article since its very inception, first he added delete due to notability/references and demanded notability by world reknown dead-tree magazines such as PC-world on the
155:
149:
110:
218:
342:
based on what I can gather so far) - I would like to conclude that
Zathura is also notable but so far, I don't see evidence for that. Quote from the forum topic:
115:
190:. Deleted as spam, then restored, still no evidence of why it is notable and the author's comments on the talkpage consist of personal attacks and
83:
78:
87:
70:
170:
17:
137:
191:
131:
400:
36:
274:
127:
386:
360:
330:
309:
286:
251:
233:
207:
52:
399:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
177:
265:
74:
282:
66:
58:
143:
302:
247:
200:
163:
370:
296:, as a commercial download site. As you can see, the sources have hardly alleviated my concerns.--
188:
even the author of the software says that there are no reliable sources that have written about it
229:
346:, if that is your view, why attack those who understand and follow the policy? Knowledge (XXG)
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
293:
187:
356:
278:
347:
326:
297:
269:
260:
243:
195:
225:
379:
49:
273:
the whole article rather than correct the erroneous wording of the sentence and I
104:
352:
322:
373:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
393:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100:
96:
92:
162:
378:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
176:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
403:). No further edits should be made to this page.
219:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
321:- coverage is lacking reliables sources. --
213:
344:"Notabilitity", such a ridiculus policy!
217:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
275:appealed to other administrator
1:
257:Comment from article creator
420:
387:01:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
53:05:46, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
396:Please do not modify it.
361:01:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
331:18:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
310:14:28, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
287:13:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
252:08:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
234:23:34, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
208:22:08, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
186:Non-notable software,
192:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
67:Zathura (software)
59:Zathura (software)
44:The result was
389:
338:(although likely
236:
222:
411:
398:
384:
377:
375:
307:
300:
223:
205:
198:
181:
180:
166:
118:
108:
90:
34:
419:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
409:
408:
407:
401:deletion review
394:
380:
368:
306:
303:
298:
204:
201:
196:
123:
114:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
417:
415:
406:
405:
390:
376:
365:
364:
363:
333:
315:
314:
313:
312:
304:
254:
237:
202:
184:
183:
120:
116:AfD statistics
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
416:
404:
402:
397:
391:
388:
385:
383:
374:
372:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
316:
311:
308:
301:
295:
290:
289:
288:
284:
280:
276:
271:
267:
262:
259:, The member
258:
255:
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:
235:
231:
227:
220:
216:
212:
211:
210:
209:
206:
199:
193:
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
117:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
395:
392:
381:
369:
343:
339:
335:
318:
279:Lord Metroid
256:
239:
214:
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
194:arguments.
150:free images
299:Terrillja
270:Terrillja
266:talk page
261:Terrillja
244:Pxtreme75
197:Terrillja
371:Relisted
226:Favonian
111:View log
382:JForget
336:Comment
294:WP:ELNO
240:Comment
156:WP refs
144:scholar
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
353:Simeon
348:is not
340:Delete
319:Delete
128:Google
88:delete
46:delete
171:JSTOR
132:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
357:talk
327:talk
323:Whpq
305:talk
283:talk
248:talk
230:talk
215:Note
203:talk
164:FENS
138:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
224:--
178:TWL
113:•
109:– (
359:)
329:)
285:)
277:.
250:)
232:)
221:.
158:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
355:(
325:(
281:(
246:(
228:(
182:)
174:·
168:·
160:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
130:(
122:(
119:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.