392:
388:
Girlfriend! What *did* I *tell* you? Lie with dogs, wake up with a franchise in a lucrative little flea farm in
Phobiadelphia and a balding ADHD grammar nazi for a neighbor. Just as well your better-looking half told me you'll be dropping in on us next week. We are so getting the band back together.
349:
As for your attempts at shifting the focus from your act of self-promotion to one of the articles created by yours truly, you don't have kids, do you? And you know nothing about the Ramon family, am I right? That article about young Assaf is here to stay, like it or not. Unlike you, he had a purpose
417:
I suppose someone might find this funny, but I doubt they're the type that would visit this page. Why are you doing this? Can I suggest that you look elsewhere for the audience you crave? While we're trying to divine identities (which I think is highly inappropriate) I would bet that
398:
And I'd say baleet that youngster's self-promoting article into outer space, but I guess lil
Zachary here would accuse me of WP:SILKSCREEN or some such nonsense if I put in an actual vote. What a vindictive winker for messing with your article. Anyhow, where's that useless
293:(Thank you, tarantino, for that link). I don't think you're ready for this jelly. And don't pretend you don't know who tarantino is. Everybody who is anybody on here knows tarantino. He's the gorgeous to your ... not so gorgeous.
561:, this entry satisfies all of those criteria - Pincus Roth is a senior editor at a major publication. The article does not now, but could with a bit of editing, list many more of his publications. As for your comment about
573:, which is probably the most suitable category listed. One of the criteria is that "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." Check out the number of citations of his work
166:
197:
Badly written autobiography by yet another foolio with a sinister agenda. Hats off to tarantino who is doing his best to keep you folks honest. Only thing that's on my mind is, can you, can you handle this?
488:
727:
226:
119:
289:
as nominator. Blatant self-promotion. Fancy you showing up here, Bangabandhu. Things must be getting lonely over at the Office of U.S. Foreign
Disaster Assistance in Arlington, VA.
508:
468:
448:
160:
692:. The formatting of the citations present in the article is a mess, and more of the reliable sources that exist should be cited, but that's hardly a basis for deleting it. —
252:
403:
when you need her? Lemme guess, drunk out of her skull in some dive bar with her latest boy toy and unable to remember her password. Drummers. Can't live with them...
389:
Don't you dare wimp out on me this time! Yeah, you can sing with your back to the audience. Like I care. Anyhow, this discussion needs more ice cream.
126:
92:
87:
96:
272:
Subject is notable, tone is balanced, and article is sourced. What are the grounds for deletion? What does "hats off to tarantino" even mean?
668:
558:
701:
79:
17:
181:
574:
148:
52:. Consensus is keep (though article can do with improvement), and it appears to have been a bad-faith nomination to begin with.
667:
of sources there are no independent reliable sources that have any depth of coverage about him. The awards are not major.
765:
40:
355:
298:
203:
142:
391:
746:
710:
680:
655:
636:
619:
594:
545:
520:
500:
480:
460:
435:
412:
381:
359:
331:
302:
281:
262:
242:
207:
61:
408:
138:
708:
83:
644:
I was satisfied by the number of citations in google scholar. And, I don't like the tone of the nomination. --
676:
218:
188:
719:
532:
he does not meet GNG. If you think there is another grounds for inclusion, I may change my vote if pinged.
423:
351:
315:
294:
259:
199:
761:
615:
590:
431:
377:
327:
277:
36:
570:
400:
222:
723:
652:
542:
419:
404:
234:
664:
610:
among those editors. I perceive the nomination as weird or flippant at best and possibly malicious.
693:
174:
75:
67:
627:
seems to be sourced and he is referenced in other newspaper articles and has received some awards.
364:
Whether or not I have kids or know him personally is irrelevant. That entry should be merged with
672:
632:
154:
606:
The tone and content that were used to first propose this deletion review make it difficult to
516:
496:
476:
456:
256:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
760:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
740:
611:
586:
427:
373:
323:
273:
57:
566:
562:
311:
689:
647:
580:
537:
230:
607:
350:
that had nothing to do with inflicting pain unto others, and he made his mother proud.
628:
512:
492:
472:
452:
113:
734:
319:
53:
365:
671:
is a failed proposal so should not be used. Citation numbers are trivial.
569:. There's nothing specific to journalists on there, but there is for
390:
369:
754:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
577:. Would like be eager to hear more about what you're thinking,
489:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
290:
227:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 30
109:
105:
101:
173:
336:
Ooh. WP:WIA. That's a novel one. Shiver me timbers.
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
768:). No further edits should be made to this page.
509:list of News media-related deletion discussions
469:list of Television-related deletion discussions
449:list of California-related deletion discussions
318:are far better candidates for deletion, namely
8:
559:Knowledge (XXG) requirements for journalists
507:Note: This debate has been included in the
487:Note: This debate has been included in the
467:Note: This debate has been included in the
447:Note: This debate has been included in the
253:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
251:Note: This debate has been included in the
726:(who commented here) have been blocked for
506:
486:
466:
446:
250:
669:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (journalists)
314:. I note that recently created pages by
310:What is the point of this? Please read
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
565:, check out the guidelines on
360:21:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
332:21:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
303:20:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
282:20:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
263:16:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
243:16:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
208:16:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
557:To the extent that there are
225:). I have transcluded it to
747:14:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
711:06:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
681:02:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
656:23:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
637:15:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
620:12:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
595:12:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
546:03:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
521:01:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
501:01:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
481:01:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
461:01:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
436:03:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
413:15:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
382:14:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
217:This AfD was not correctly
62:18:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
785:
368:and I am going to make a
757:Please do not modify it.
722:(the AfD nominator) and
291:https://archive.is/VfHjr
32:Please do not modify it.
571:creative professionals
426:are the same editors.
396:
394:
395:That's more like it.
370:proposal accordingly
663:. While there is a
76:Zachary Pincus-Roth
68:Zachary Pincus-Roth
397:
215:Automated comment:
720:Nora The Terrible
523:
503:
483:
463:
424:Nora The Terrible
352:Nora The Terrible
316:Nora The Terrible
295:Nora The Terrible
265:
245:
241:
200:Nora The Terrible
776:
759:
745:
706:
699:
584:
237:
236:Talk to my owner
232:
213:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
784:
783:
779:
778:
777:
775:
774:
773:
772:
766:deletion review
755:
744:
731:
724:Roberta Benigni
705:
702:
694:
578:
420:Roberta Benigni
405:Roberta Benigni
240:
235:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
782:
780:
771:
770:
750:
749:
738:
713:
703:
683:
658:
639:
622:
600:
599:
598:
597:
549:
548:
525:
524:
504:
484:
464:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
386:
385:
384:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
267:
266:
247:
246:
233:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
781:
769:
767:
763:
758:
752:
751:
748:
743:
742:
737:
736:
729:
725:
721:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
700:
697:
691:
687:
684:
682:
678:
674:
673:duffbeerforme
670:
666:
662:
659:
657:
654:
651:
650:
649:
643:
640:
638:
634:
630:
626:
623:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
602:
601:
596:
592:
588:
582:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
553:
552:
551:
550:
547:
544:
541:
540:
539:
533:
531:
527:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
505:
502:
498:
494:
490:
485:
482:
478:
474:
470:
465:
462:
458:
454:
450:
445:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
393:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
279:
275:
271:
264:
261:
258:
254:
249:
248:
244:
238:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
756:
753:
739:
733:
715:
695:
685:
660:
646:
645:
641:
624:
603:
554:
536:
535:
529:
528:
401:Sue Gardenia
286:
285:
269:
268:
257:Everymorning
221:to the log (
214:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
612:Bangabandhu
587:Bangabandhu
428:Bangabandhu
374:Bangabandhu
324:Bangabandhu
320:Assaf Ramon
274:Bangabandhu
219:transcluded
161:free images
690:JumpLike23
648:JumpLike23
581:Jumplike23
538:JumpLike23
366:Ilan Ramon
762:talk page
513:• Gene93k
493:• Gene93k
473:• Gene93k
453:• Gene93k
37:talk page
764:or in a
704:contribs
629:Cathar66
585:thanks.
120:View log
39:or in a
728:socking
718:: both
716:Comment
698:Fascist
696:Grammar
604:Comment
555:Comment
239::Online
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
741:(talk)
735:Bilorv
661:Delete
653:(talk)
567:WP:BIO
563:WP:GNG
543:(talk)
530:Delete
312:WP:WIA
287:Delete
260:(talk)
223:step 3
139:Google
97:delete
54:Drmies
608:WP:GF
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
688:per
686:Keep
677:talk
642:Keep
633:talk
625:Keep
616:talk
591:talk
575:here
517:talk
497:talk
477:talk
457:talk
432:talk
422:and
409:talk
378:talk
356:talk
328:talk
299:talk
278:talk
270:Keep
229:. —
204:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
665:lot
189:TWL
118:– (
732:—
730:.
679:)
635:)
618:)
593:)
534:--
519:)
511:.
499:)
491:.
479:)
471:.
459:)
451:.
434:)
411:)
380:)
372:.
358:)
330:)
322:.
301:)
280:)
255:.
206:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
675:(
631:(
614:(
589:(
583::
579:@
515:(
495:(
475:(
455:(
430:(
407:(
376:(
354:(
326:(
297:(
276:(
202:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.