413:
obligatory to be notable, I have seen quite a few musicians without labels and not appearing in charts and yet have an article here, what you mentioned are other points that can show that a musician is remarkable but as WP:MUSICBIO says "Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at
331:. The majority of sources listed are blog-like sites, including the fourth one you yourself listed, and the third source is just a video. Really only those first two would be considered reliable sources, but both of the articles aren't about him in his notability as a musician but as local general interest pieces about him overcoming his disability. ~
398:: The two French articles are fine, but this individual doesn't meet notability for musicians. "He has a disability and music helps him" is the extent of the articles. He's not charted, has won no awards, no critical notice. He's a musician, yes, but doesn't meet our notability standards. People make music, but aren't all notable.
475:
This is not promotion, it is normal to talk about the works of a music artist, this is the case in all articles about music artists and it is in no way seen as promotion especially when it is supported by reliable sources... He has already produced works and in the article from La Voix du Nord it was
417:
of the following criteria." By reading and basing myself on these guidelines it respects the first condition and is therefore remarkable, it is not specified at all what the reliable articles should be about, here it is about his illness, and his career and work as a musician, even the title of the
201:
Most of the articles listed are from non-reliable sources ("wikifamouspeople", "musicalive.net", "chunedesk") or are short articles that are essentially press releases about new music. The Voix Du Nord seems to be having technical difficulties; I can't even access them nine out of ten times without
311:
It would be useful to specify that this musician was deleted from French
Knowledge because according to the deletion history the sources were only music sites, the third time the page was deleted because it was whitewashed by its author, sources have appeared since and as the author of the comment
412:
If we had to summarize it would rather be "how this musician got there in his musical projects despite his dyspraxia.", I did not see where it was said that music helped him with his illness, that is absolutely not the subject. The points that you mention like labels, charted, awards... are not
307:
Concerning Wix, the author is not objective because he cannot say with certainty that absolutely no notable musician uses Wix, should we question the notability of musicians who do not even use a website? I don't think so, this remark shows how weak the arguments for deletions are.
418:
article contains the word "musician", he is qualified as such in the title. Contrary to what you say, reliable sources do not only talk about his illness but also about his works, his way of playing, his genres and his future works and projects as a musician. It also respects
358:
He's a person with a disability that music helps, he's not a professional musician. He's not been signed by a record label, has not won any prizes/awards. These are reliable sources yes, but simply appearing in the newspaper isn't enough. Why is he famous for making music?
303:
have their
Knowledge page here. It meets the first criterion by appearing in several reliable sources and is therefore eligible, the sources cited by the previous comment are just used to introduce additional information generally already supported by secondary sources.
291:"1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." This musician answers with the sources . I specify that 2 of these newspapers,
162:
461:: This is PROMO. The one article says he's wanting to release an online album in 2025. He's not released anything at this point, still being a student at the music academy, when the article was written.
253:
344:
and therefore a reliable source. These three sources respond well to what 1. of WP:MUSICBIO requires, this person is therefore remarkable because he meets one of the criteria well. .
476:
said that he had already started preparing his album, if you had consulted the references you would know that he was no longer at the music academy when the article was written.
119:
516:
156:
261:
249:
538:
257:
312:
said the deletion standards are not the same on this
Knowledge, this argument does not show once again that an article on this musician has no place here.
66:
51:
490:
He's still not released the album, it's coming out in 2025. This is not a pro musician, just a music student with big dreams. That's not notable.
245:
566:
517:
https://www.lavoixdunord.fr/1496397/article/2024-08-28/atteint-de-dyspraxie-karl-legris-surmonte-son-handicap-pour-apprendre-le-piano
92:
87:
46:
39:
17:
96:
539:
https://video-streaming.orange.fr/actu-politique/ugc-zephyrmusic-devoile-son-premier-album-love-n-covers-CNT000002eCIeT.html
299:
177:
144:
79:
481:
431:
378:
349:
317:
123:
60:
56:
527:
138:
477:
427:
374:
345:
313:
134:
499:
485:
470:
449:
435:
407:
382:
368:
353:
335:
321:
273:
237:
571:
495:
466:
445:
403:
364:
184:
170:
440:
He's a student that's not release any music in a commercial fashion, that's why he's not notable.
328:
285:
269:
223:
194:
332:
234:
35:
83:
423:
293:
150:
549:
491:
462:
441:
399:
360:
560:
419:
265:
193:
Non-notable music artist that does not seem to meet any of the criteria listed at
113:
229:
The subject has been deleted as non-notable three times in his own Home country:
75:
27:
230:
226:
guidelines, a notable musician would not be using a free site such as that.
528:
https://www.lobservateur.fr/nord-bachant-karl-legris-musicien-dyspraxique/
284:: The person who proposed the Afd forgot to introduce the first point of
218:
Furthermore, his own website is hosted on and has a subdomain with
219:
205:
No album on the national music chart, no record certified gold
340:
For the 3rd source I see a video and a text written by
109:
105:
101:
169:
550:
https://www.museanima.fr/zephyrmusic-mistral-gagnant/
327:My first bullet point is about the first point of
244:Note: This discussion has been included in the
183:
8:
67:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
243:
211:No album release from a major record label
208:No non-trivial coverage of a concert tour
509:
7:
373:See response to your other comment
24:
248:lists for the following topics:
52:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
486:16:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
471:00:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
450:11:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
436:16:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
408:00:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
383:16:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
369:00:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
354:15:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
336:15:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
322:15:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
274:00:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
238:22:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
222:- while not strictly in the
500:00:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
42:(AfD)? Read these primers!
588:
567:AfD debates (Biographical)
214:etc, the list goes on.
124:edits since nomination
40:Articles for deletion
254:Bands and musicians
478:SparklingBlueMoon
428:SparklingBlueMoon
375:SparklingBlueMoon
346:SparklingBlueMoon
314:SparklingBlueMoon
276:
57:Guide to deletion
47:How to contribute
579:
552:
547:
541:
536:
530:
525:
519:
514:
246:deletion sorting
188:
187:
173:
117:
99:
37:
587:
586:
582:
581:
580:
578:
577:
576:
557:
556:
555:
548:
544:
537:
533:
526:
522:
515:
511:
294:La Voix du Nord
130:
90:
74:
71:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
585:
583:
575:
574:
569:
559:
558:
554:
553:
542:
531:
520:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
289:
288:
278:
277:
231:fr:ZephyrMusic
216:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
191:
190:
127:
70:
69:
64:
54:
49:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
584:
573:
570:
568:
565:
564:
562:
551:
546:
543:
540:
535:
532:
529:
524:
521:
518:
513:
510:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
487:
483:
479:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
416:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
393:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
309:
305:
302:
301:
296:
295:
287:
283:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
241:
240:
239:
236:
232:
227:
225:
221:
213:
210:
207:
204:
200:
199:
198:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
44:
43:
41:
36:
29:
26:
19:
545:
534:
523:
512:
458:
414:
395:
341:
333:Darth Stabro
310:
306:
298:
292:
290:
281:
235:Darth Stabro
228:
217:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
33:
572:AfD debates
329:WP:MUSICBIO
286:WP:MUSICBIO
224:WP:MUSICBIO
195:WP:MUSICBIO
157:free images
76:ZephyrMusic
28:ZephyrMusic
561:Categories
492:Oaktree b
463:Oaktree b
442:Oaktree b
415:least one
400:Oaktree b
361:Oaktree b
202:an error.
424:WP:BASIC
342:L'Avenir
300:L'Avenir
266:Skynxnex
120:View log
61:glossary
459:Comment
260:, and
163:WP refs
151:scholar
93:protect
88:history
38:New to
420:WP:GNG
396:Delete
262:France
250:People
135:Google
97:delete
258:Music
178:JSTOR
139:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
496:talk
482:talk
467:talk
446:talk
432:talk
422:and
404:talk
379:talk
365:talk
350:talk
318:talk
297:and
282:Keep
270:talk
171:FENS
145:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
220:Wix
185:TWL
118:– (
563::
498:)
484:)
469:)
448:)
434:)
426:.
406:)
381:)
367:)
352:)
320:)
272:)
264:.
256:,
252:,
197:.
165:)
122:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
494:(
480:(
465:(
444:(
430:(
402:(
377:(
363:(
348:(
316:(
268:(
233:~
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
116:)
78:(
63:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.