Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Zhou Zhonghe - Knowledge

Source 📝

227:. NAS is the #1 formal membership a scientist can have anywhere in the world. He is the Director of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. His article "An exceptionally preserved Lower Cretaceous ecosystem" shows 330 citations and it is in 300:#1. Additionally (and as an independent factor), he's the Director of his institute (see previous source) which also fulfils #5 on the secondary Academics guideline. With both reliable sources demonstrated and notability demonstrated, this is easily a keep. 231:, not just a top scientific journal but the top journal. There is any amount of secondary source coverage of him. I see you are tagging Chinese-sounding names willy-nilly. Please stop; you are embarrassing Knowledge with these tags. 166: 197:
Does "describing" an extinct bird make one sufficiently notable? As an outsider to the field, my feeling is "no." The external links in the article are dead links. Unless notability further established,
269: 119: 160: 249: 321:... The article needs to better express the subject's notability, but there are over 1000 citations on the first 5 Google Scholar titles alone. 126: 92: 87: 96: 17: 181: 79: 148: 221: 236: 293: 392: 40: 347: 142: 138: 388: 372: 351: 330: 309: 281: 261: 240: 232: 211: 61: 57: 36: 368: 188: 343: 305: 174: 326: 318: 297: 277: 257: 83: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
387:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
292:. There are tons of independent and reliable sources that I found relatively easily. Appears 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53: 364: 154: 360: 339: 301: 322: 207: 342:. I've added Churn's source to the article, as well as a source for his discovery. — 273: 253: 75: 67: 113: 203: 381:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
225: 270:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
109: 105: 101: 173: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 395:). No further edits should be made to this page. 363:before making further nominations in this area. 187: 8: 268:Note: This debate has been included in the 250:list of Science-related deletion discussions 248:Note: This debate has been included in the 338:per the US National Academy membership and 267: 247: 220:. Wow! This prof is on the "American" 7: 359:as above. Nom is advised to study 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 373:22:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 352:20:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 331:19:45, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 310:15:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 282:13:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 262:13:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC) 241:18:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 222:National Academy of Sciences 212:15:35, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 62:17:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 412: 384:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:The result was 284: 264: 403: 386: 233:Churn and change 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 411: 410: 406: 405: 404: 402: 401: 400: 399: 393:deletion review 382: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 409: 407: 398: 397: 377: 376: 354: 344:David Eppstein 333: 312: 294:well-published 286: 285: 265: 244: 243: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 408: 396: 394: 390: 385: 379: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 355: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 334: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 313: 311: 307: 303: 299: 296:, which fits 295: 291: 288: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 266: 263: 259: 255: 251: 246: 245: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 223: 219: 216: 215: 214: 213: 209: 205: 201: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 383: 380: 356: 335: 314: 289: 228: 217: 199: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 76:Zhou Zhonghe 68:Zhou Zhonghe 49: 47: 31: 28: 336:Strong keep 290:Strong Keep 224:. See here: 161:free images 54:Mark Arsten 365:Xxanthippe 340:WP:PROF#C3 319:WP:SCHOLAR 298:WP:SCHOLAR 389:talk page 357:Snow keep 302:Lord Roem 274:• Gene93k 254:• Gene93k 218:Snow Keep 50:Snow Keep 37:talk page 391:or in a 323:Celtechm 120:View log 39:or in a 361:WP:Prof 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 229:Nature 200:delete 139:Google 97:delete 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 369:talk 348:talk 327:talk 317:per 315:keep 306:talk 278:talk 258:talk 237:talk 208:talk 202:. -- 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 204:Nlu 189:TWL 118:– ( 371:) 350:) 329:) 308:) 280:) 272:. 260:) 252:. 239:) 210:) 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:. 375:. 367:( 346:( 325:( 304:( 276:( 256:( 235:( 206:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Mark Arsten
talk
17:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Zhou Zhonghe
Zhou Zhonghe
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Nlu
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.