163:
159:
294:- a paper was published on this in what appears to be a peer-reviewed journal. That's nice, but it doesn't make a subject notable. A note in the Chinese version of SciAm really doesn't, either. It's not nothing, but it's not enough to establish notability in this rough crowd.
131:, whose article I am separately nominating for deletion. A previous version of the biography was successfully prodded, and at the same time the material now in this article was added but then removed by community consensus from
234:
Thanks. You're right. I went and examined the references of the full articles and the former refers to an L. Zhou and the latter (Chen-Hsu-Zhou) conjecture is by a J. Zhou. I've changed my vote. Thanks for catching
341:
120:
369:
260:
per nom and per
Reneeholle. Could not find anything at all related to this conjecture in MathSciNet. A non-notable conjecture by a non-notable mathematician.
209:
The
Weymark and Huang references appear to be about something unrelated. Zhou is a common name among academics; you have to be sure it's the right Zhou. —
87:
82:
91:
74:
17:
403:
36:
402:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
214:
144:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
384:
359:
332:
303:
286:
269:
244:
218:
203:
175:
148:
56:
351:
78:
380:
328:
240:
199:
171:
132:
70:
62:
282:
210:
140:
128:
135:, an article about some more notable conjectures on the same general topic (the distribution of
345:
344:) article about a neologism. (Does the paper by Zhou himself call this the Zhou conjecture?)
299:
166:. I think the article needs to be expanded a bit to explain it more for non-mathemeticians.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
376:
324:
265:
236:
195:
167:
127:
Non-notable and highly-likely-to-be-incorrect conjecture by a non-notable mathematician,
278:
136:
139:). Rather than try another prod, I thought it would be best to go straight to an AfD.
323:). If there is an article here, better to start over once notability is established.
295:
49:
108:
158:
I did a quick Google search and a few third-party scholarly sources came up (see
261:
311:
The conjecture, as presently stated, is meaningless (the variable
396:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
194:
I've added two new scholarly references to the article.
115:
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
406:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
370:list of Science-related deletion discussions
368:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
423:
399:Please do not modify it.
385:00:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
360:11:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
333:15:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
304:00:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
287:12:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
277:- agree with nominator.
270:17:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
245:10:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
219:06:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
204:05:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
176:05:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
149:04:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
57:00:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
319:part, and not in the
133:Mersenne conjectures
387:
373:
331:
414:
401:
374:
364:
356:
355:
348:
340:. Non-notable (
327:
118:
112:
94:
54:
44:The result was
34:
422:
421:
417:
416:
415:
413:
412:
411:
410:
404:deletion review
397:
353:
352:
346:
325:Septentrionalis
315:appears in the
137:Mersenne primes
114:
85:
71:Zhou conjecture
69:
66:
63:Zhou conjecture
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
420:
418:
409:
408:
391:
389:
388:
362:
335:
306:
289:
272:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
224:
223:
222:
221:
211:David Eppstein
180:
179:
141:David Eppstein
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
419:
407:
405:
400:
394:
393:
392:
386:
382:
378:
371:
367:
363:
361:
357:
349:
343:
339:
336:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
256:
255:
246:
242:
238:
233:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
192:
191:
189:
188:
186:
185:
183:
182:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
129:Zhou Haizhong
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
398:
395:
390:
365:
347:silly rabbit
337:
320:
316:
312:
308:
291:
274:
257:
231:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
155:
154:
126:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
377:Fabrictramp
309:Weak delete
329:PMAnderson
156:Weak Keep.
279:Gandalf61
121:View log
342:scholar
296:Merenta
232:Delete.
88:protect
83:history
52:JForget
338:Delete
292:Delete
275:Delete
258:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:Delete
262:Nsk92
237:Renee
235:that.
196:Renee
168:Renee
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
381:talk
366:Note
354:talk
321:then
300:talk
283:talk
266:talk
241:talk
215:talk
200:talk
172:talk
164:this
162:and
160:this
145:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
375:--
372:.
383:)
358:)
317:if
302:)
285:)
268:)
243:)
217:)
202:)
174:)
147:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:--
379:(
350:(
313:p
298:(
281:(
264:(
239:(
213:(
198:(
170:(
143:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.