643:, like most the people here I agree the majority of the sources are namechecking, however several are clearly not, and these substantial sources are easily sufficient to pass GNG. He features on several lists of the most important Asian scientists, so I have no issue with the relevance of the subject.
442:. The articles in the Google search are largely about the subject of disarmament with one-line snippets about something Mian said. Those cites provide no insight to Mian. In passing, I deleted from the article a "reference" to a huffpost blog written by Mian.--
736:: "Published authors are kept as notable if they have received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work, or if their work is likely to be very widely read." There's no requirement for the books to have Wiki articles themselves.
575:, 3 from his organization (Princeton), one from Amazon, merely his book for sale, the remaining didn't discussed him independently in details. Also as someone said above the article more or less looks like CV with listing of
281:
as a peace activist. And searching elsewhere didn't help: citation counts too low on Google scholar for academic notability, and only the one clickbait asianscientist link about him by someone independent of him.
336:
168:
246:
702:
I don't think these are well-known works. If they were, then they must be critically reviewed and would have article on
Knowledge (XXG). There is little coverage in WP:RS and he fails
340:
121:
733:
419:
399:
226:
258:
238:
162:
644:
508:
I've added a template in the talk page to help find more sources. If no results come in the next few weeks, a delete is fine or a suggested draft space.--
128:
297:
17:
674:, Jun 01, 2002; Vol. 34, No. 2, p. 312-315. Reviews the book 'Out of the Nuclear Shadow,' edited by Smitu Kothari and Zia Mian. more
491:
I agree with the User:Gaarmyvet that merely namechecking in the RS is not enough. I suggest to delete this poorly sourced bio. --
339:, and that is without taking into account the huge online footprint of non-news references which are also easily available (see
451:
614:
375:
argument than actually showing us that the subject is discussed in detail by multiple sources independent of the subject.
526:
94:
89:
772:
183:
40:
427:
407:
98:
681:, Feb 02, 2002; Vol. 173, No. 2328. Reviews the book 'Out of the Nuclear Shadow,' by Smitu Kothari and Zia Mian. more
150:
81:
293:
285:
200:
423:
403:
144:
383:
316:
211:
768:
741:
691:
254:
234:
36:
274:
140:
636:
378:
372:
311:
206:
745:
725:
695:
651:
627:
592:
563:
547:
517:
500:
483:
466:
458:
431:
411:
390:
362:
323:
289:
218:
176:
63:
707:
660:
622:
576:
610:
588:
513:
718:
580:
190:
479:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
767:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
618:
270:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
737:
687:
250:
230:
703:
640:
344:
278:
496:
356:
572:
602:
538:
444:
156:
711:
606:
584:
558:
509:
85:
557:
as this seems like a resume and has no intrinsic usefulness to the encyclopedia. -
475:
474:, not notable enough for stand alone article and reads like a press release or CV.
53:
115:
492:
349:
635:
What I find even more puzzling is why no one has noticed he easily meets
77:
69:
663:; writer / editor of multiple books with substantive reviews. Samples:
269:. This very poorly sourced article provides no evidence of passing
761:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
734:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Literature
371:
This is no argument that there are many sources. That much like
529:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
247:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
686:
Substantive body of work to meet Wiki notability criteria.
111:
107:
103:
175:
308:
Thanks for your help, in checking the other sources.
535:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
343:citations for instance). The subject qualifies for
189:
670:Out of the Nuclear Shadow (Book). Bajpai, Kanti.
335:Notable enough with sufficient news coverage per
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
775:). No further edits should be made to this page.
420:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions
400:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
418:Note: This debate has been included in the
398:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
227:list of Science-related deletion discussions
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
417:
397:
283:
244:
224:
579:Journal papers and Knowledge (XXG) is
732:I do not see it this way. Please see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
639:. In my opinion this easily meets
571:Actually the sources used are not
24:
710:for merely publishing the books.
677:UNITED WE STAND. Edwards, Rob.
1:
746:15:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
726:12:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
696:05:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
652:11:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
628:01:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
593:06:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
564:15:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
548:07:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
518:23:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
501:19:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
484:18:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
467:13:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
432:05:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
412:05:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
391:18:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
363:14:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
324:18:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
259:16:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
239:16:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
219:15:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
199:No in-depth coverage. Fails
64:08:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
604:doesn't make him pass GNG?
792:
764:Please do not modify it.
601:Can someone explain why
32:Please do not modify it.
672:Critical Asian Studies'
277:as a filmmaker, nor
273:as a physicist, nor
550:
546:
510:NadirAli نادر علی
434:
424:Shawn in Montreal
414:
404:Shawn in Montreal
389:
322:
301:
288:comment added by
261:
241:
217:
783:
766:
723:
716:
649:
626:
545:
543:
536:
534:
532:
530:
465:
463:
456:
449:
447:Georgia Army Vet
386:
381:
376:
359:
352:
319:
314:
309:
214:
209:
204:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
61:
57:
34:
791:
790:
786:
785:
784:
782:
781:
780:
779:
773:deletion review
762:
719:
712:
645:
605:
551:
539:
537:
525:
523:
459:
452:
445:
443:
384:
379:
357:
350:
317:
312:
212:
207:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
59:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
789:
787:
778:
777:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
684:
683:
682:
675:
665:
664:
654:
630:
596:
566:
533:
522:
521:
520:
503:
486:
469:
436:
435:
415:
395:
394:
393:
366:
365:
329:
328:
327:
326:
303:
302:
290:David Eppstein
263:
262:
242:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
788:
776:
774:
770:
765:
759:
758:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
724:
722:
717:
715:
709:
706:. Can't pass
705:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
680:
679:New Scientist
676:
673:
669:
668:
667:
666:
662:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
642:
638:
634:
631:
629:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
603:
600:
597:
594:
590:
586:
583:repository. –
582:
578:
574:
570:
567:
565:
562:
561:
556:
553:
552:
549:
544:
542:
531:
528:
519:
515:
511:
507:
504:
502:
498:
494:
490:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
468:
464:
462:
457:
455:
450:
448:
441:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
396:
392:
388:
387:
382:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
364:
360:
354:
353:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
325:
321:
320:
315:
307:
306:
305:
304:
299:
295:
291:
287:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
215:
210:
202:
201:WP:NACADEMICS
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
763:
760:
720:
713:
678:
671:
656:
646:
632:
598:
577:unreferenced
568:
559:
554:
540:
524:
506:Keep for now
505:
488:
471:
460:
453:
446:
439:
377:
348:
332:
310:
284:— Preceding
266:
205:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
738:K.e.coffman
688:K.e.coffman
573:independent
275:WP:CREATIVE
163:free images
637:WP:NAUTHOR
541:Sandstein
373:WP:ILIKEIT
251:XOR'easter
231:XOR'easter
769:talk page
708:WP:AUTHOR
661:WP:AUTHOR
647:Dysklyver
581:WP:NOTCVs
380:Greenbörg
313:Greenbörg
208:Greenbörg
37:talk page
771:or in a
607:Headbomb
585:Ammarpad
560:NsTaGaTr
527:Relisted
454:Contribs
347:easily.
298:contribs
286:unsigned
122:View log
78:Zia Mian
70:Zia Mian
39:or in a
599:Puzzled
476:Kierzek
271:WP:PROF
169:WPÂ refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
721:(talk)
704:WP:GNG
641:WP:GNG
569:Delete
555:Delete
489:Delete
472:Delete
440:Delete
385:(talk)
345:WP:GNG
318:(talk)
279:WP:GNG
267:Delete
213:(talk)
141:Google
99:delete
714:Störm
493:Saqib
351:Mar4d
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
60:Train
16:<
742:talk
692:talk
657:Keep
633:Keep
589:talk
514:talk
497:talk
480:talk
461:Talk
428:talk
408:talk
358:talk
341:book
337:this
333:Keep
294:talk
255:talk
235:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
659:as
191:TWL
120:– (
744:)
694:)
621:·
617:·
613:·
591:)
516:)
499:)
482:)
430:)
422:.
410:)
402:.
361:)
300:)
296:•
257:)
249:.
237:)
229:.
203:.
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
740:(
690:(
625:}
623:b
619:p
615:c
611:t
609:{
595:*
587:(
512:(
495:(
478:(
426:(
406:(
355:(
292:(
253:(
233:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
56:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.