288:
Correction, there is one reliable source. The Mail
Tribune is a long-respected paper in Oregon, it's definitely reliable. They certainly don't do business features like this for every new website or company in their region. But cheezhead.com is just a blog with no significant reputation for
265:
With respects, even the two sources read like adverts. They do not sound in the least as neutral. Is there such available? Perhaps some neutral comparison? Or something to show a special notability?
243:- The article has issues, most of which I removed or moved to the talk page. There are at least two substantial idependant reliable sources that concern this site, so good enough. -
311:
Yeah, cheezhead.com is not a reiiable source. Apparantly CNBC radio did a profile on them. I haven't listened to it yet, and they may not add it in time for this AfD. Read more
121:
371:
324:
252:
17:
141:
88:
83:
92:
405:
36:
320:
248:
75:
274:
167:
404:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
298:
231:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
53:
218:
editors, have rewritten the article signficantly. To suggest that it should be deleted because it violates
384:
316:
244:
357:
267:
210:. Zumeo is the subject of an exclusive article by the major newspaper for its area of operation (the
160:
389:
361:
328:
302:
279:
256:
235:
198:
172:
145:
129:
79:
57:
295:
228:
155:
190:
137:
71:
63:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
223:
378:
219:
215:
353:
345:
290:
222:
is patently false. That said, I don't think that Zumeo clearly meets the requirements of
349:
214:). So it's certainly had some coverage in the news. Also, I myself, as well as other
181:
133:
211:
109:
312:
49:
398:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
352:. Delete as lacking substantial coverage in reliable sources. --
128:
Advert for not yet notable company written up Mat
Rudisill,
116:
105:
101:
97:
289:reliability, it clearly fails the requirements of
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
408:). No further edits should be made to this page.
372:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
370:: This debate has been included in the
180:advert/spam/notability/corp, pick one.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
348:does not constitute evidence of
220:our conflict of interest rules
1:
390:22:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
362:13:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
329:08:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
303:04:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
280:05:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
257:05:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
236:03:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
199:21:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
173:18:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
146:18:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
58:08:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
425:
401:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
216:WikiProject Oregon
194:
186:
44:The result was
392:
375:
195:
192:
187:
184:
416:
403:
387:
381:
376:
366:
317:Peregrine Fisher
301:
270:
245:Peregrine Fisher
234:
191:
183:
163:
119:
113:
95:
34:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
415:
414:
413:
412:
406:deletion review
399:
385:
379:
346:reliable source
313:on my talk page
294:
268:
227:
161:
130:VP of Marketing
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
422:
420:
411:
410:
394:
393:
364:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
306:
305:
296:Steven Walling
283:
282:
260:
259:
238:
229:Steven Walling
201:
175:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
421:
409:
407:
402:
396:
395:
391:
388:
382:
373:
369:
365:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
339:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
308:
307:
304:
300:
297:
292:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
278:
277:
276:
272:
271:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
237:
233:
230:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
188:
179:
176:
174:
171:
170:
169:
165:
164:
157:
153:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
400:
397:
367:
341:
275:
273:
266:
240:
212:Mail Tribune
207:
203:
177:
168:
166:
159:
151:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
380:Fabrictramp
344:. A single
206:leaning to
386:talk to me
354:Malcolmxl5
350:notability
156:WP:Advert
72:Zumeo.com
64:Zumeo.com
325:contribs
269:Schmidt,
253:contribs
162:Schmidt,
142:contribs
134:RHaworth
122:View log
224:WP:CORP
204:Neutral
185:HARMBOY
89:protect
84:history
342:Delete
299:(talk)
232:(talk)
178:Delete
152:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
50:Stifle
46:delete
291:WP:RS
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
368:Note
358:talk
321:talk
315:. -
249:talk
241:Keep
208:Keep
193:TALK
154:per
138:Talk
132:. —
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
377:--
374:.
323:) (
251:) (
158:..
383:|
360:)
327:)
293:.
255:)
226:.
197:)
144:)
140:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
356:(
319:(
247:(
189:(
182:P
136:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.