358:
926:. Whichever side you happen to be on, try to move the discussion towards consensus by getting pro/con points identified so that a new edit may be attempted as quickly as possible. Feel free to try a new bold edit during the discussion if the new edit reasonably reflects some aspect of the opposing editors' concerns. This approach quickly determines whether the important issues have been resolved; if not, it brings the core sticking points into focus.
496:
168:
586:
discussed until a compromise or consensus is reached. Each pass through the cycle may find a new, interested editor to work with, or new issue being disputed. If you follow the process as it is intended each time, you should eventually achieve consensus with all parties. As such, BRD is in general not an end unto itself; it moves the process past a blockage, and helps people get back to cooperative editing.
825:: If you browbeat someone into accepting your changes, you are not building consensus, you are making enemies. This cycle is designed to highlight strongly opposing positions, so if you want to get changes to stick both sides will have to bend, possibly even bow. You should be clear about when you are compromising and should expect others to compromise in return, but do not expect it to be exactly even.
717:, briefly explain why you reverted. You can encourage the bold editor to start a discussion on the article talk page if they want to learn more about why you reverted. Alternatively, start a discussion yourself on the article talk page about the issue. People feel more cooperative if you let them know that you're willing to listen to their case for the change. Otherwise, a revert can seem brusque.
60:
135:
301:
629:: Make only changes you absolutely need to. A bold edit doesn't have to be a huge edit, and keeping your edit focused is more likely to yield results than making an over-reaching change. If a bold edit might be controversial, consider adding "(revert if inappropriate)" or similar to the edit summary to alert others.
557:
BRD is not an excuse to revert any change more than once. This applies equally to bold editors and to reverters. If your reversion is met with another bold effort, then you should consider discussing instead of reverting. The talk page is open to all editors, not just bold ones. The first person to
365:
BRD is most useful for pages where seeking and achieving consensus in advance of the bold edit could be difficult, perhaps because it is not clear which other editors are watching or sufficiently interested in the page, though there are other suitable methods. BRD helps editors who have a good grasp
1026:
You make a bold edit, then open a discussion. The edit is found to be problematic or lacking, so it is reverted. This sometimes happens when people attempt to make an edit that has severe flaws or problems that cannot be resolved via other methods. If this cycle happens, it might be best for you to
969:
BRD is a way of letting you focus on one editor: You cared enough about the page to try to improve it, someone else cared enough to revert your bold change, and you both cared enough to find a compromise through discussion. This is an excellent collaborative style. But there may be other editors
1017:
You do not need to revert an edit before the discussion can start. If you see (or make) a bold edit and you want to talk about it, then you can click on the talk page and start discussing it. You might discover ways to refine it, or you might discover that you're satisfied with the edit as it is.
868:
You do not have to get it all done in one edit. If you can find consensus on some parts, make those changes, and let them settle. This will give everyone a new point to build from. Having completed one successful cycle, you may also find it easier to get traction for further changes, or you may
857:
If they don't want to, that's okay, but be sure to offer. The offer alone shows deference and respect. If that editor accepts, (1) the history will show who made the change and the other editor will have control over the precise wording (keeping you from applying a change different from the one
787:
As long as the discussion is moving forward, do not feel the need to respond to everyone, as this increases the chance of discussion losing focus and going far afield. Stay on point and pick your responses. If discussion dies off, you can always go back and get yourself reverted again to find (or
585:
After someone reverts your change, thus taking a stand for the existing version or against the change, you can proceed toward a consensus with the challenging editor through discussion on a talk page. While discussing the disputed content, neither editor should revert or change the content being
221:
is a fundamental principle of
Knowledge (XXG). All editors are welcome to make positive contributions. It's how new information is added to Knowledge (XXG). When in doubt, edit! Either the edit will get the attention of interested editors, or you will simply improve the page. Either is a good
1054:
Don't stop editing, and don't discuss. Make a guess about why the reverter disagreed with you, and try a different edit to see whether that will be accepted. It's often helpful if your next effort is smaller, because that may help you figure out why the other editor objected to your change.
3557:
1597:
1035:
You make a bold edit, then open a discussion. After the discussion, you or others boldly improve the edit based on the discussion suggestions. This cycle is useful if your edit is helpful, but needs to be improved, and if feedback would be valuable to improving the edit.
944:
period (3RR bright-line rule), do not edit that content in any manner that reverts any content, in whole or in part, even as little as a single word, for over 24 hours. Doing so just past the 24-hour period could be seen as gaming the system and sanctions may still be
1108:
an example of such a mistake: A revert with a rationale that you disagree with, or that does not make sense to you. Another case where the re-revert may be necessary is when an incumbent editor reverts without justification in the edit summary, which is a form
2758:
997:"BOLD, revert, discuss" doesn't work well in all situations. It is ideally suited to disputes that involve only a few people, all of whom are interested in making progress. There are many other options, and some may be more suitable for other situations.
970:
interested in that page, so a third editor might revert your compromise, or might revert your next attempt to improve it. If so, that's okay: You can repeat the BRD cycle with that third editor. Just start a new discussion, and find a new compromise.
2162:
304:
It is often hard to find out who to talk with to gain consensus. By making a bold edit you attract the attention of people who are genuinely interested in a page, and have it on their watchlist. You can then discuss your issues with them.
1627:
3444:
568:
BRD is not a valid course of action when using advanced permissions. Editors with permissions such as administrator or template editor can take actions which few editors are able to revert if they disagree, preventing the R step of
2893:
3324:
2496:
957:
Because of the nature of
Knowledge (XXG), a BRD cycle may begin naturally, without either editor even realizing it. Once begun, its purpose requires that no reversion be counter-reverted. If this happens, something akin to
2853:
396:
BRD is best used by experienced
Knowledge (XXG) editors. It may require more diplomacy and skill to use successfully than other methods, and has more potential for failure. Using BRD in volatile situations is discouraged.
520:
for the reverter. If you tell someone to follow BRD when you revert their edits, then you need to follow BRD yourself, which means joining the discussion and explaining your substantive reasons for rejecting their edits.
2662:
2257:
3697:
1964:
3637:
3384:
3005:
1642:
3707:
1131:(see above), particularly among editors who already have a positive working relationship. Beware, though: To an outside observer, such "friendly reverts" may not be readily distinguishable from edit-warring, and
3449:
1309:
3973:
3968:
3259:
49:
207:
mandated by
Knowledge (XXG) policy, but it can be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. In other situations, you may have better success with
3762:
320:
While editing a particular page that many editors are discussing with little to no progress being made, or when an editor's concerns are not addressed on the talk page after a reasonable amount of effort.
2062:
3747:
3497:
2037:
707:
a change to an article in the absence of explicit consensus, be sure you actually have a disagreement with the content of the bold edit (and can express that disagreement), not merely a concern that
2092:
1789:
3767:
3174:
2360:
1814:
1737:
1319:
1939:
1369:
1359:
1090:
If you genuinely believe the reversion was a mistake you might try speeding things up by reverting the revert, but you should explain why you think the other editor made a mistake in a note or
635:: Stop editing the page long enough to see if anyone objects. Depending on the nature of your change and the traffic on the page, this may take anywhere from mere minutes to more than a week.
3214:
3194:
2157:
2127:
1439:
2451:
2177:
1454:
1394:
1527:
711:
might disagree with the edit. A revert needs to present a path forward, either by expressing a concern with the content of the edit itself, or pointing to a previous discussion that did.
3912:
1859:
701:. Improving pages through collaborative editing is ideal. However, if you find yourself making reversions or near-reversions, then stop editing and move to the next stage, "Discuss".
3219:
288:
that reasonably addresses some aspect of those concerns. You can try this even if the discussion has not reached an explicit conclusion, but be sure to avoid engaging in any kind of
3299:
3254:
3164:
3114:
2380:
2107:
2082:
4021:
806:). It is OK to disagree with a past consensus, but use reasonable discretion when you want to revisit such issues. If you choose not to back off immediately, it will help if you:
3807:
2097:
1732:
1717:
1429:
3134:
1697:
3289:
3204:
2320:
2172:
2077:
1692:
1652:
1507:
916:
reverts, it is best not to escalate the situation by reverting again. Instead, try to build consensus through seeking additional input. Several methods for this are listed at
3917:
3010:
2923:
2521:
2262:
2087:
2012:
1747:
1722:
1647:
1259:
1218:
334:, and make what you currently believe to be the optimal changes based on your best effort. Your change might involve re-writing, rearranging, adding or removing information.
966:, so you can always come back later. Otherwise, if you have the energy and the time, use the suggestions on this page to "pull out". Then continue working as per consensus.
2898:
2843:
2828:
812:: You are trying to get the full and considered views of those who care enough to disagree with your edit. If you do not listen and do not try to find consensus, you are
3344:
3294:
3149:
2441:
1779:
1662:
1542:
641:: Be ready to start a discussion as soon as you notice that anyone has objected. If you want, you can even write your response while you are waiting to see what happens.
589:
If the BRD process works ideally (sometimes it does not), people will after a time begin to refrain from outright reversion, and edits will start to flow more naturally.
2581:
1959:
3877:
2506:
2252:
1989:
1914:
1484:
2561:
3772:
3424:
3269:
3189:
2858:
2607:
2536:
2390:
1687:
962:
an aircraft happens. If you're not feeling up to it, it might be best to walk away for a while. Unlike the immediate danger of an aircraft plummeting to the ground,
3817:
3374:
2072:
1949:
1839:
1742:
1727:
841:
1954:
1329:
3359:
3329:
3139:
2888:
2883:
2420:
1869:
1824:
1754:
1102:
An example of such a mistake is when someone reverts your removal of duplicate material because they didn't realize that the same sentence was on the page twice.
3897:
2576:
3672:
2117:
1492:
1206:
3757:
1474:
3627:
3502:
1522:
4060:
3389:
3104:
2501:
2187:
1969:
1799:
1712:
1314:
2247:
1464:
3978:
3279:
3239:
2953:
2566:
2486:
2002:
1904:
1834:
1622:
3867:
3439:
2622:
578:
Making bold edits may sometimes draw a response from an interested editor, who may have the article on their watchlist. If no one responds, you have the
3119:
2556:
2302:
1794:
1334:
1164:
407:...there is a dispute on the page, by editors with entrenched positions, and you are reigniting a debate that has achieved stalemate without consensus.
2918:
2863:
2833:
1304:
781:: The easiest way to intensify this cycle and make it unbreakable is to be uncivil. Try to lead by example and keep your partner in the same mindset.
3587:
3507:
2370:
411:
4055:
3902:
3872:
3662:
3642:
3199:
2868:
2823:
2818:
2627:
2511:
2415:
2152:
1864:
1809:
1764:
1702:
1672:
1567:
1339:
3682:
3184:
1784:
1469:
1146:
Move on to another article. You might be able to improve a hundred articles in the time that it takes you to discuss this one. Why not move on?
3837:
3712:
3562:
3284:
2980:
2788:
2667:
2516:
2112:
1934:
1884:
1424:
247:
3852:
3792:
3717:
3209:
3179:
3099:
2928:
1899:
1889:
1854:
1667:
1572:
1294:
765:
If your bold edit was reverted, then do not re-revert to your version. If your reversion was reverted, then do not re-revert to your version.
3892:
833:: Don't assume that a re-revert edit summary can constitute "discussion": There is no way for others to respond without risking an edit war.
3862:
3727:
3702:
3582:
3354:
2813:
2722:
2682:
2586:
2242:
2227:
2102:
1707:
1557:
1512:
1444:
1404:
1254:
561:
BRD is not mandatory. Neither are editors obliged to start it nor are they obliged to stick to it just because you started it. They may try
4004:
3832:
3812:
3737:
3732:
3304:
2793:
2436:
2345:
2207:
2142:
2052:
2042:
2017:
1979:
1974:
1909:
1677:
1637:
1582:
1110:
547:
85:
2290:
693:, is better than complete reversion. The other disputant may respond with another bold edit, or with a refinement on your improvement.
2908:
2571:
2400:
4026:
3429:
2717:
2702:
2617:
2192:
1537:
1284:
1279:
1046:
You edit, they edit, you edit again, with each edit improving the prior edit. This is successful, collaborative editing. Keep at it.
3822:
3632:
3602:
3567:
3394:
2873:
2783:
2697:
2340:
2310:
2182:
1364:
685:, first consider whether the original text could have been better improved in a different way or if part of the edit can be fixed to
579:
1459:
1006:
936:
policy and get good-faith editors blocked even during a productive editing exchange. Any such edits must be clear attempts to try a
844:
if they insist on using only edit summaries, but one or the other is the proper forum for the discussion component of the BRD cycle.
437:...the individual who reverts the bold change actually supports it, but is reverting as a proxy for some other, unidentified person.
3988:
3857:
3687:
3414:
3314:
3124:
3000:
2913:
2878:
2803:
2773:
2637:
2471:
2461:
2410:
2237:
2222:
2147:
1919:
1769:
1612:
1399:
1344:
1269:
1199:
795:
540:
2903:
2798:
2763:
1592:
3963:
3777:
3692:
3454:
3399:
3319:
3274:
3229:
3224:
3109:
2943:
2738:
2446:
2267:
2047:
2022:
1929:
1924:
1804:
1434:
1349:
1264:
533:
43:
37:
3958:
3154:
2838:
4014:
3787:
3667:
3547:
3522:
3349:
2985:
2948:
2938:
2541:
2481:
2335:
1632:
1607:
1562:
1414:
1389:
1379:
1354:
917:
723:: If your reversion is reverted, then there may be a good reason for it. Go to the talk page to learn why you were reverted.
271:
212:. Care and diplomacy should be exercised. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient.
3907:
3722:
3607:
3532:
3419:
3339:
3309:
3159:
2778:
2748:
2712:
2602:
2466:
2385:
2167:
2032:
1997:
1844:
1602:
1552:
1547:
1274:
68:
2330:
1517:
904:
Once discussion has begun, restoring one's original edit without taking other users' concerns into account may be seen as
4009:
3597:
3592:
3552:
3537:
3527:
3404:
3249:
2657:
2647:
2546:
2355:
2217:
1502:
1374:
3983:
3940:
3752:
3617:
3517:
3477:
3434:
3379:
3369:
3364:
3334:
3169:
3144:
3129:
3084:
2970:
2692:
2632:
2365:
2202:
2137:
2132:
2122:
1874:
1497:
1249:
1231:
1192:
3657:
3612:
2975:
2848:
2808:
2612:
2350:
1879:
1324:
1179:
389:
3887:
3827:
3802:
3742:
3652:
3647:
3234:
3051:
2753:
2743:
2531:
2526:
1944:
1617:
1587:
1419:
798:. On the other hand, repeatedly rehashing old arguments without new reasoning might strike some editors as being
285:
243:
231:
517:
448:... people are only discussing policy or theory, and are not applying reasoning or trying to negotiate consensus.
3847:
3797:
3577:
3572:
3542:
3031:
2995:
2990:
2687:
2491:
2325:
1849:
1682:
1657:
1532:
899:
267:
84:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
3842:
3409:
3264:
2677:
2672:
2456:
2375:
2232:
1894:
1174:
1040:
940:
solution that reflects some aspect of the other editor's remarks. If you have reached three reverts within a
696:
551:
263:
149:
is encouraged, as it will result in either improving an article or stimulating discussion. If your edit gets
1299:
959:
452:
3782:
3244:
3041:
2965:
1829:
1774:
1759:
1289:
253:
157:
456:
326:
Find an interested person, and reach a compromise or consensus with that person, in one-on-one discussion.
3882:
3492:
3061:
3036:
3015:
2395:
2027:
1819:
1384:
1169:
1140:
582:
to continue editing. If your edit is reverted, the BRD cycle has been initiated by the reverting editor.
428:
308:
258:
your bold edit with the person who reverted you. To follow BRD specifically, instead of one of the many
200:
89:
72:
392:
is currently opposed to making any changes whatsoever (when pages are frozen, "policy", or high-profile)
357:
3056:
3046:
2960:
2933:
2197:
1449:
1084:
1066:
980:
879:
739:
686:
657:
601:
472:
99:
767:
Instead, take it to the talk page (see below). If you re-revert, then you are no longer following BRD.
3512:
2476:
2315:
2212:
1409:
912:. The objective is to seek consensus, not force one's own will upon other editors. If you encounter
905:
799:
562:
259:
209:
76:
2652:
2642:
2551:
1215:
803:
338:
225:
173:
151:
792:
Carefully consider whether "policy", "consensus", or "procedure" are valid reasons for the revert
689:
some of the edit, and whether you would like to make that bold edit instead. Partial reversion,
348:
as needed, and reach an agreement. Apply your agreement. When reverts have stopped, you are done.
2405:
909:
776:
690:
235:
3677:
3622:
2768:
2707:
2007:
813:
215:
145:
1132:
1117:
933:
859:
837:
495:
434:...individuals revert bold changes but aren't willing to discuss improvements to the page.
1151:
1095:
1091:
772:
374:
345:
331:
289:
179:
541:
reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes
386:
Your view differs significantly from a rough consensus on an emotionally loaded subject.
284:
in discussion, when you have a better understanding of the reverter's concerns, you may
908:. These so-called "re-reverts" are uncollaborative and could incur sanctions such as a
344:
Discuss the changes you would like to make with this VIP, perhaps using other forms of
127:
Explanatory essay about the
Knowledge (XXG):Consensus and Knowledge (XXG):Be bold pages
404:...there is consensus in the community against the specific change you'd like to make.
4049:
3558:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
840:. You can use the article's talk page (preferred) or the editor's user talk page, or
421:
274:
processes. Talk to that one person until the two of you have reached an agreement.
17:
963:
858:
agreed upon). And, (2) such a practice prevents you from falling afoul of the
417:...the page is subject to some other access control. (Get the control lifted.)
242:
encourage reverting, but recognizes that reversions happen. Always follow the
167:
2759:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
546:
BRD is never a reason for reverting. Unless the reversion is supported by
505:
BRD is an optional process for experienced editors. BRD only works when
1184:
50:
Knowledge (XXG):What editors mean when they say you have to follow BRD
2163:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
794:: These sometimes get overused on consensus-based wikis even though
3445:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
721:
If you revert twice, then you are no longer following the BRD cycle
1027:
step away from the article, and consider the discussion feedback.
356:
299:
166:
1628:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
3938:
3475:
3082:
2288:
1229:
1188:
1005:
Don't be bold with potentially controversial changes; instead,
463:
In short: boldly negotiate where no one has negotiated before.
300:
592:
For each step in the cycle, here are some points to remember.
532:
BRD is not a justification for imposing one's own view or for
488:
129:
54:
1009:
first. Make no edits to the page until you have agreement.
727:
If people start making non-revert changes again, you are done
3325:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2497:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1965:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
869:
find you have reached a reasonable compromise and can stop.
558:
start a discussion is the person who is best following BRD.
2854:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2663:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2258:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1598:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
1310:
Editing
Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
377:
and a bold edit is made as a compromise or middle ground.
3698:
How many
Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
380:
Discussion has died out with no agreement being reached.
3708:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
1074:
988:
887:
754:
747:
672:
665:
616:
609:
480:
427:...a single editor is reverting changes and exhibiting
234:. If you revert, be specific about your reasons in the
230:
an edit if you disagree with it and cannot immediately
114:
107:
3260:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2894:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
3006:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1643:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
1083:"WP:BRR" redirects here. Previously it redirected to
647:: Regardless of what others say, keep your composure.
445:... people haven't really thought things through yet.
3450:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
1180:
Knowledge (XXG):Editing policy § Try to fix problems
174:
Knowledge (XXG):Editing policy § Talking and editing
3997:
3951:
3024:
2731:
2595:
2429:
2301:
2061:
1988:
1483:
1242:
866:
Assume this revision will not be the final version.
3969:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3748:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
1370:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
1155:processes may also be useful to break a deadlock.
699:" process is the ideal collaborative editing cycle
341:your edit. You have now discovered your first VIP.
42:"WP:CYCLE" redirects here. You may be looking for
1940:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
1232:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
2093:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
2038:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1790:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
3768:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3498:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
3175:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1815:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
1320:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
855:Let the other editor apply agreed-upon changes.
524:...then don't tell other editors to follow BRD.
3195:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
2361:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
2128:Counting and sorting are not original research
785:Talk with one or at most two partners at once.
4022:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3638:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
2158:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1440:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
1200:
1165:Knowledge (XXG):Method for consensus building
932:Repeatedly doing this can easily violate the
729:: The normal editing cycle has been restored.
8:
3688:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2452:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
2178:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1455:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1430:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
1395:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
565:, or even an alternative not mentioned here.
31:
3220:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
410:...the page is protected. (You may request
383:Active discussion is not producing results.
366:of a subject to rapidly engage discussion.
3948:
3935:
3913:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3485:
3472:
3300:Notability is not relevance or reliability
3255:News coverage does not decrease notability
3165:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
3115:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
3092:
3079:
2298:
2285:
2108:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
2083:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1239:
1226:
1207:
1193:
1185:
924:However, don't get stuck on the discussion
494:
266:to this part of the page, don't engage in
3808:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
2098:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1718:Identifying and using independent sources
964:Knowledge (XXG) will be here a long while
554:, the reversion is not part of BRD cycle.
161:with the person who reverted your change.
3974:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
3135:Big events make key participants notable
2582:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1960:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1698:Formatting bilateral relations templates
199:strategies that editors may use to seek
155:, do not revert again. Instead, begin a
86:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
3385:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
3290:Notability is not a level playing field
3205:How the presumption of notability works
2321:Contributing to complicated discussions
2173:How the presumption of notability works
1693:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1508:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
4061:Knowledge (XXG) essays about consensus
3918:You should not write meaningless lists
3215:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2522:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
2263:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
2088:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1653:Don't hope the house will build itself
1260:All Five Pillars are equally important
513:reverting editors follow the process.
369:Examples cases for use include where:
361:Consensus is stuck. BRD to the rescue!
262:, don't restore your bold edit, don't
3345:One sentence does not an article make
3295:Notability is not a matter of opinion
3011:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2924:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2442:A weak personal attack is still wrong
2381:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
2013:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1955:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1780:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1543:An unfinished house is a real problem
1528:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
1330:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
501:If you don't want to talk about it...
7:
3898:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3878:Things that should not be surprising
3573:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2899:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2844:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2829:Don't call people by their real name
2577:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
2507:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1915:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
441:BRD is especially successful where:
270:, and don't start any of the larger
171:BRD is optional, but complying with
3773:No one cares about your garage band
3758:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
3425:What is and is not routine coverage
3270:No one cares about your garage band
3190:Existence does not prove notability
2608:Assume the assumption of good faith
2537:There is no Divine Right of Editors
2391:Relationships with academic editors
2253:Why was the page I created deleted?
2248:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
1688:Featured articles may have problems
1475:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
1007:start a discussion on the talk page
563:one of the alternatives given below
44:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cycling
38:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Germany
4056:Knowledge (XXG) supplemental pages
3818:Please do not murder the newcomers
3375:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2859:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2073:Adjectives in your recommendations
1950:What an article should not include
1840:The problem with elegant variation
1648:Don't get hung up on minor details
1465:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
918:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution
842:invite the editor to the talk page
715:In the edit summary of your revert
429:other forms of ownership attitudes
346:Knowledge (XXG) dispute resolution
90:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
3868:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
3440:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
3140:Businesses with a single location
2421:You have a right to remain silent
1870:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1825:Potential, not just current state
1755:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
788:refind) other interested parties.
281:
27:Knowledge (XXG) supplemental page
2889:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2884:Don't ignore community consensus
2118:Confusing arguments mean nothing
639:Expect resistance—even hostility
133:
58:
3390:Sources must be out-of-universe
3105:All high schools can be notable
2502:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
2188:Identifying blatant advertising
1970:The world will not end tomorrow
1800:Not everything needs a template
1713:How to write a featured article
1315:Editors will sometimes be wrong
518:get-out-of-discussion-free card
373:Two factions are engaged in an
3979:Avoid writing redundant essays
3628:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3503:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
3330:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
3280:Notability cannot be purchased
3240:Masking the lack of notability
2003:Copyediting reception sections
1905:Temporary versions of articles
1835:Principle of Some Astonishment
1623:Creating controversial content
1523:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
1470:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
539:BRD is not a valid excuse for
238:or on the talk page. BRD does
1:
4005:About policies and guidelines
3120:Articles with a single source
2744:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
2567:Two wrongs don't make a right
2557:The rules of polite discourse
2487:It's not the end of the world
1795:Not everything needs a navbox
1663:Don't "teach the controversy"
1335:Here to build an encyclopedia
210:alternatives to this approach
30:"WP:BRD" redirects here. For
3893:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
3588:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3508:Alternatives to edit warring
2371:Maintaining a friendly space
818:"It's policy, live with it."
3873:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3663:Editing under the influence
3200:Google searches and numbers
2919:Don't template the regulars
2834:Don't call the kettle black
2628:Be excellent to one another
2512:Revert notification opt-out
2416:We are all Wikipedians here
1865:Put a little effort into it
1810:Obtain peer review comments
1765:Introduction to structurism
1703:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1673:Editors are not mindreaders
1578:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1568:Beef up that first revision
1340:Leave it to the experienced
1305:Don't search for objections
457:getting down to brass tacks
189:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
4077:
3903:Why not create an account?
3838:Requirements for adminship
3713:How to vandalize correctly
3683:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3643:Don't delete the main page
3563:Avoid using preview button
3285:Notability comparison test
2869:Don't fight fire with fire
2864:Don't eat the troll's food
2824:Don't call a spade a spade
2819:Don't bludgeon the process
2668:Encourage full discussions
2517:Shadowless Fists of Death!
2153:Don't attack the nominator
2113:But there must be sources!
1935:Try not to leave it a stub
1885:Source your plot summaries
1127:may function as a form of
1111:WP:Status quo stonewalling
1082:
1064:
978:
877:
737:
655:
599:
470:
400:In general, BRD fails if:
248:revert only when necessary
97:
33:Bundesrepublik Deutschland
29:
3947:
3934:
3853:Sarcasm is really helpful
3793:Notability is not eternal
3718:How to win a citation war
3488:
3484:
3471:
3180:Every snowflake is unique
3100:Advanced source searching
3095:
3091:
3078:
2981:No, you can't have a pony
2929:Do not insult the vandals
2789:Don't be high-maintenance
2346:Encouraging the newcomers
2297:
2284:
1890:Specialized-style fallacy
1855:Pruning article revisions
1683:Endorsements (commercial)
1668:Editing on mobile devices
1573:Blind men and an elephant
1548:Articles have a half-life
1295:Dissent is not disloyalty
1265:Avoid vague introductions
1238:
1225:
1170:Knowledge (XXG):Short BRD
952:Additional considerations
816:. You should not accept
309:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus
73:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus
3863:The Night Before Wikimas
3728:Ignore every single rule
3703:How to get away with UPE
3583:Before they were notable
3355:Overreliance upon Google
3150:Common sourcing mistakes
2723:Settle the process first
2683:Imagine others complexly
2587:Writing for the opponent
2562:There is no common sense
2243:Unopposed AFD discussion
2228:Relisting can be abusive
2103:Avoid repeated arguments
1708:Give an article a chance
1558:Avoid mission statements
1518:Advanced text formatting
1513:Advanced article editing
1460:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
1445:The rules are principles
1405:Product, process, policy
1255:Articles must be written
1050:Bold, revert, bold again
459:with concrete proposals.
268:back-and-forth reverting
180:Knowledge (XXG):Edit war
141:This page in a nutshell:
3998:Policies and guidelines
3833:Requests for medication
3813:Please bite the newbies
3738:Mess with the templates
3305:Notability means impact
2839:Don't call things cruft
2814:Don't be the Fun Police
2623:Avoid the word "vandal"
2572:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
2437:A thank you never hurts
2208:Liar liar pants on fire
2143:Deletion is not cleanup
2053:Writing better articles
2043:Write the article first
2018:Gender-neutral language
1990:Writing article content
1980:Writing better articles
1975:Write the article first
1910:Tertiary-source fallacy
1678:Encourage the newcomers
1638:Dictionaries as sources
1583:Build content to endure
814:wasting everyone's time
453:talking past each other
77:Knowledge (XXG):Be bold
4027:Policy writing is hard
3733:Is that even an essay?
3430:What notability is not
3185:Existence ≠ Notability
2794:Don't be inconsiderate
2718:Read before commenting
2703:Mind your own business
2618:Avoid personal remarks
2193:Identifying test edits
1538:A navbox on every page
1493:100K featured articles
1290:Concede lost arguments
1285:Competence is required
1216:Knowledge (XXG) essays
1094:to reduce the risk of
831:Discuss on a talk page
823:Be ready to compromise
362:
313:
184:
32:
3823:Pledge of Tranquility
3568:Avoid using wikilinks
3395:Subjective importance
2909:Don't spite your face
2698:Keep it down to earth
2462:Beware of the tigers!
2401:Too long; didn't read
2341:Edit at your own pace
2311:Accepting other users
2078:AfD is not a war zone
1425:There is no seniority
1365:Neutrality of sources
1133:the three-revert rule
1022:Bold, discuss, revert
810:Listen very carefully
633:See what happens next
360:
303:
264:make a different edit
170:
3989:Quote your own essay
3858:Sausages for tasting
3633:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3603:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3415:Vanispamcruftisement
3315:Notability sub-pages
3125:Avoid template creep
3085:Essays on notability
3001:There are no oracles
2784:Don't be a WikiBigot
2638:Call a spade a spade
2411:Unblock perspectives
2238:The Heymann Standard
2223:Overzealous deletion
2183:I just don't like it
1920:There is no deadline
1785:"Murder of" articles
1613:Common-style fallacy
1485:Article construction
1400:Process is important
1345:Levels of competence
1270:Be a reliable source
1125:bold, revert, revert
1061:Bold, revert, revert
796:consensus can change
548:policies, guidelines
18:Knowledge (XXG):BRDC
3778:No one really cares
3693:Go ahead, vandalize
3455:Two prongs of merit
3400:Third-party sources
3320:Notabilitymandering
3275:No one really cares
3230:Inherent notability
3225:Independent sources
3110:Alternative outlets
2944:Nationalist editing
2914:Don't take the bait
2879:Don't help too much
2804:Don't be prejudiced
2774:Don't be an ostrich
2739:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2472:Deletion as revenge
2447:Advice for hotheads
2268:No Encyclopedic Use
2148:Does deletion help?
2048:Writing about women
1930:The deadline is now
1925:There is a deadline
1805:Nothing is in stone
1435:Tendentious editing
1350:Levels of consensus
1031:Bold, discuss, bold
534:tendentious editing
337:Wait until someone
88:as it has not been
3788:No sorcery threats
3668:Embrace Stop Signs
3548:Assume good wraith
3523:Anti-Wikipedianism
3360:Perennial websites
3350:Other stuff exists
2986:Passive aggression
2949:No angry mastodons
2939:Hate is disruptive
2799:Don't be obnoxious
2764:Don't be a fanatic
2542:Most ideas are bad
2482:Forgive and forget
2291:Essays on civility
1900:Run an edit-a-thon
1633:Deprecated sources
1608:Citation underkill
1593:Chesterton's fence
1563:Be neutral in form
1415:Reasonability rule
1380:Oversimplification
1355:Most ideas are bad
1152:dispute resolution
363:
314:
286:attempt a new edit
272:dispute resolution
203:. This process is
185:
4043:
4042:
4039:
4038:
4035:
4034:
3930:
3929:
3926:
3925:
3908:Yes legal threats
3723:Ignore all essays
3608:Complete bollocks
3533:Asshole John rule
3467:
3466:
3463:
3462:
3420:What BLP1E is not
3340:One hundred words
3310:Notability points
3074:
3073:
3070:
3069:
2874:Don't give a fuck
2749:Civil POV pushing
2713:Mutual withdrawal
2603:Assume good faith
2467:Civility warnings
2386:Please say please
2336:Editors' pronouns
2280:
2279:
2276:
2275:
2168:Follow the leader
2033:Use our own words
1998:Avoid thread mode
1845:Pro and con lists
1603:Citation overkill
1553:Autosizing images
1275:Civil POV pushing
860:three-revert rule
529:
528:
195:) is one of many
165:
164:
125:
124:
69:explanatory essay
16:(Redirected from
4068:
3984:Finding an essay
3949:
3936:
3598:Butterfly effect
3593:Boston Tea Party
3553:Assume stupidity
3538:Assume bad faith
3528:Articlecountitis
3486:
3473:
3405:Trivial mentions
3250:Minimum coverage
3093:
3080:
2779:Don't be ashamed
2658:Discussing cruft
2648:Deny recognition
2547:Nothing is clear
2356:Expect no thanks
2299:
2286:
2218:Nothing is clear
2065:deleting content
1748:Tertiary sources
1503:Acronym overkill
1375:The one question
1240:
1227:
1220:
1209:
1202:
1195:
1186:
1077:
991:
890:
757:
750:
705:Before reverting
683:Before reverting
675:
668:
619:
612:
580:silent consensus
498:
489:
483:
296:General overview
137:
136:
130:
117:
110:
62:
61:
55:
35:
21:
4076:
4075:
4071:
4070:
4069:
4067:
4066:
4065:
4046:
4045:
4044:
4031:
3993:
3964:Value of essays
3943:
3922:
3753:Legal vandalism
3618:Counting juntas
3518:Anti-Wikipedian
3480:
3478:Humorous essays
3459:
3435:What to include
3380:Run-of-the-mill
3370:Read the source
3335:Offline sources
3130:Bare notability
3087:
3066:
3020:
2971:No Confederates
2769:Don't be a jerk
2727:
2693:Keep it concise
2633:Beyond civility
2591:
2425:
2366:How to be civil
2331:Don't retaliate
2293:
2272:
2203:Keep it concise
2138:Delete the junk
2133:Delete or merge
2123:Content removal
2057:
2023:Myth vs fiction
1984:
1875:Robotic editing
1738:Science sources
1733:Primary sources
1723:History sources
1498:Abandoned stubs
1479:
1250:Article content
1234:
1221:
1213:
1161:
1144:
1088:
1081:
1080:
1073:
1069:
1063:
1052:
1044:
1033:
1024:
1015:
1003:
995:
994:
987:
983:
977:
954:
894:
893:
886:
882:
876:
851:
761:
760:
753:
746:
742:
736:
679:
678:
671:
664:
660:
654:
623:
622:
615:
608:
604:
598:
576:
487:
486:
479:
475:
469:
467:What BRD is not
451:... people are
390:Local consensus
355:
298:
134:
128:
121:
120:
113:
106:
102:
94:
93:
59:
53:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
4074:
4072:
4064:
4063:
4058:
4048:
4047:
4041:
4040:
4037:
4036:
4033:
4032:
4030:
4029:
4024:
4019:
4018:
4017:
4012:
4001:
3999:
3995:
3994:
3992:
3991:
3986:
3981:
3976:
3971:
3966:
3961:
3955:
3953:
3945:
3944:
3939:
3932:
3931:
3928:
3927:
3924:
3923:
3921:
3920:
3915:
3910:
3905:
3900:
3895:
3890:
3885:
3880:
3875:
3870:
3865:
3860:
3855:
3850:
3845:
3840:
3835:
3830:
3825:
3820:
3815:
3810:
3805:
3800:
3795:
3790:
3785:
3780:
3775:
3770:
3765:
3760:
3755:
3750:
3745:
3740:
3735:
3730:
3725:
3720:
3715:
3710:
3705:
3700:
3695:
3690:
3685:
3680:
3675:
3670:
3665:
3660:
3658:Editsummarisis
3655:
3650:
3645:
3640:
3635:
3630:
3625:
3620:
3615:
3613:Counting forks
3610:
3605:
3600:
3595:
3590:
3585:
3580:
3575:
3570:
3565:
3560:
3555:
3550:
3545:
3540:
3535:
3530:
3525:
3520:
3515:
3510:
3505:
3500:
3495:
3489:
3482:
3481:
3476:
3469:
3468:
3465:
3464:
3461:
3460:
3458:
3457:
3452:
3447:
3442:
3437:
3432:
3427:
3422:
3417:
3412:
3407:
3402:
3397:
3392:
3387:
3382:
3377:
3372:
3367:
3362:
3357:
3352:
3347:
3342:
3337:
3332:
3327:
3322:
3317:
3312:
3307:
3302:
3297:
3292:
3287:
3282:
3277:
3272:
3267:
3262:
3257:
3252:
3247:
3242:
3237:
3232:
3227:
3222:
3217:
3212:
3207:
3202:
3197:
3192:
3187:
3182:
3177:
3172:
3170:Don't cite GNG
3167:
3162:
3157:
3152:
3147:
3145:But it's true!
3142:
3137:
3132:
3127:
3122:
3117:
3112:
3107:
3102:
3096:
3089:
3088:
3083:
3076:
3075:
3072:
3071:
3068:
3067:
3065:
3064:
3059:
3054:
3049:
3044:
3042:WikiHarassment
3039:
3034:
3028:
3026:
3022:
3021:
3019:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2976:No queerphobia
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2946:
2941:
2936:
2931:
2926:
2921:
2916:
2911:
2906:
2901:
2896:
2891:
2886:
2881:
2876:
2871:
2866:
2861:
2856:
2851:
2846:
2841:
2836:
2831:
2826:
2821:
2816:
2811:
2806:
2801:
2796:
2791:
2786:
2781:
2776:
2771:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2751:
2746:
2741:
2735:
2733:
2729:
2728:
2726:
2725:
2720:
2715:
2710:
2705:
2700:
2695:
2690:
2685:
2680:
2675:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2630:
2625:
2620:
2615:
2613:Assume no clue
2610:
2605:
2599:
2597:
2593:
2592:
2590:
2589:
2584:
2579:
2574:
2569:
2564:
2559:
2554:
2549:
2544:
2539:
2534:
2529:
2524:
2519:
2514:
2509:
2504:
2499:
2494:
2489:
2484:
2479:
2474:
2469:
2464:
2459:
2454:
2449:
2444:
2439:
2433:
2431:
2427:
2426:
2424:
2423:
2418:
2413:
2408:
2403:
2398:
2393:
2388:
2383:
2378:
2373:
2368:
2363:
2358:
2353:
2351:Enjoy yourself
2348:
2343:
2338:
2333:
2328:
2323:
2318:
2313:
2307:
2305:
2295:
2294:
2289:
2282:
2281:
2278:
2277:
2274:
2273:
2271:
2270:
2265:
2260:
2255:
2250:
2245:
2240:
2235:
2230:
2225:
2220:
2215:
2210:
2205:
2200:
2195:
2190:
2185:
2180:
2175:
2170:
2165:
2160:
2155:
2150:
2145:
2140:
2135:
2130:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2100:
2095:
2090:
2085:
2080:
2075:
2069:
2067:
2064:
2059:
2058:
2056:
2055:
2050:
2045:
2040:
2035:
2030:
2025:
2020:
2015:
2010:
2005:
2000:
1994:
1992:
1986:
1985:
1983:
1982:
1977:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1947:
1942:
1937:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1917:
1912:
1907:
1902:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1880:Sham consensus
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1842:
1837:
1832:
1827:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1807:
1802:
1797:
1792:
1787:
1782:
1777:
1772:
1767:
1762:
1757:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1745:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1725:
1715:
1710:
1705:
1700:
1695:
1690:
1685:
1680:
1675:
1670:
1665:
1660:
1655:
1650:
1645:
1640:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1600:
1595:
1590:
1585:
1580:
1575:
1570:
1565:
1560:
1555:
1550:
1545:
1540:
1535:
1530:
1525:
1520:
1515:
1510:
1505:
1500:
1495:
1489:
1487:
1481:
1480:
1478:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1452:
1447:
1442:
1437:
1432:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1412:
1407:
1402:
1397:
1392:
1387:
1382:
1377:
1372:
1367:
1362:
1357:
1352:
1347:
1342:
1337:
1332:
1327:
1325:Explanationism
1322:
1317:
1312:
1307:
1302:
1297:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1246:
1244:
1236:
1235:
1230:
1223:
1222:
1214:
1212:
1211:
1204:
1197:
1189:
1183:
1182:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1160:
1157:
1143:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:still applies.
1121:
1103:
1079:
1078:
1070:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1051:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1032:
1029:
1023:
1020:
1014:
1011:
1002:
999:
993:
992:
984:
979:
976:
973:
972:
971:
967:
953:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
921:
892:
891:
883:
878:
875:
872:
871:
870:
863:
850:
847:
846:
845:
828:
827:
826:
820:
789:
782:
768:
759:
758:
751:
743:
738:
735:
732:
731:
730:
724:
718:
712:
702:
697:WP:Bold-refine
677:
676:
669:
661:
656:
653:
650:
649:
648:
642:
636:
630:
621:
620:
613:
605:
600:
597:
594:
575:
572:
571:
570:
566:
559:
555:
544:
537:
527:
526:
492:
485:
484:
476:
471:
468:
465:
461:
460:
449:
446:
439:
438:
435:
432:
425:
418:
415:
408:
405:
394:
393:
387:
384:
381:
378:
354:
351:
350:
349:
342:
335:
328:
327:
324:
323:How to proceed
321:
318:
297:
294:
244:editing policy
206:
163:
162:
138:
126:
123:
122:
119:
118:
111:
103:
98:
95:
83:
82:
65:
63:
47:
41:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4073:
4062:
4059:
4057:
4054:
4053:
4051:
4028:
4025:
4023:
4020:
4016:
4013:
4011:
4008:
4007:
4006:
4003:
4002:
4000:
3996:
3990:
3987:
3985:
3982:
3980:
3977:
3975:
3972:
3970:
3967:
3965:
3962:
3960:
3957:
3956:
3954:
3950:
3946:
3942:
3937:
3933:
3919:
3916:
3914:
3911:
3909:
3906:
3904:
3901:
3899:
3896:
3894:
3891:
3889:
3888:Watchlistitis
3886:
3884:
3883:The WikiBible
3881:
3879:
3876:
3874:
3871:
3869:
3866:
3864:
3861:
3859:
3856:
3854:
3851:
3849:
3846:
3844:
3841:
3839:
3836:
3834:
3831:
3829:
3828:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3826:
3824:
3821:
3819:
3816:
3814:
3811:
3809:
3806:
3804:
3803:Play the game
3801:
3799:
3796:
3794:
3791:
3789:
3786:
3784:
3781:
3779:
3776:
3774:
3771:
3769:
3766:
3764:
3761:
3759:
3756:
3754:
3751:
3749:
3746:
3744:
3743:My local pond
3741:
3739:
3736:
3734:
3731:
3729:
3726:
3724:
3721:
3719:
3716:
3714:
3711:
3709:
3706:
3704:
3701:
3699:
3696:
3694:
3691:
3689:
3686:
3684:
3681:
3679:
3676:
3674:
3671:
3669:
3666:
3664:
3661:
3659:
3656:
3654:
3653:Edits Per Day
3651:
3649:
3648:Editcountitis
3646:
3644:
3641:
3639:
3636:
3634:
3631:
3629:
3626:
3624:
3621:
3619:
3616:
3614:
3611:
3609:
3606:
3604:
3601:
3599:
3596:
3594:
3591:
3589:
3586:
3584:
3581:
3579:
3576:
3574:
3571:
3569:
3566:
3564:
3561:
3559:
3556:
3554:
3551:
3549:
3546:
3544:
3541:
3539:
3536:
3534:
3531:
3529:
3526:
3524:
3521:
3519:
3516:
3514:
3511:
3509:
3506:
3504:
3501:
3499:
3496:
3494:
3491:
3490:
3487:
3483:
3479:
3474:
3470:
3456:
3453:
3451:
3448:
3446:
3443:
3441:
3438:
3436:
3433:
3431:
3428:
3426:
3423:
3421:
3418:
3416:
3413:
3411:
3408:
3406:
3403:
3401:
3398:
3396:
3393:
3391:
3388:
3386:
3383:
3381:
3378:
3376:
3373:
3371:
3368:
3366:
3363:
3361:
3358:
3356:
3353:
3351:
3348:
3346:
3343:
3341:
3338:
3336:
3333:
3331:
3328:
3326:
3323:
3321:
3318:
3316:
3313:
3311:
3308:
3306:
3303:
3301:
3298:
3296:
3293:
3291:
3288:
3286:
3283:
3281:
3278:
3276:
3273:
3271:
3268:
3266:
3263:
3261:
3258:
3256:
3253:
3251:
3248:
3246:
3243:
3241:
3238:
3236:
3235:Insignificant
3233:
3231:
3228:
3226:
3223:
3221:
3218:
3216:
3213:
3211:
3208:
3206:
3203:
3201:
3198:
3196:
3193:
3191:
3188:
3186:
3183:
3181:
3178:
3176:
3173:
3171:
3168:
3166:
3163:
3161:
3158:
3156:
3153:
3151:
3148:
3146:
3143:
3141:
3138:
3136:
3133:
3131:
3128:
3126:
3123:
3121:
3118:
3116:
3113:
3111:
3108:
3106:
3103:
3101:
3098:
3097:
3094:
3090:
3086:
3081:
3077:
3063:
3060:
3058:
3055:
3053:
3052:WikiLawyering
3050:
3048:
3045:
3043:
3040:
3038:
3035:
3033:
3030:
3029:
3027:
3025:WikiRelations
3023:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2955:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2947:
2945:
2942:
2940:
2937:
2935:
2932:
2930:
2927:
2925:
2922:
2920:
2917:
2915:
2912:
2910:
2907:
2905:
2902:
2900:
2897:
2895:
2892:
2890:
2887:
2885:
2882:
2880:
2877:
2875:
2872:
2870:
2867:
2865:
2862:
2860:
2857:
2855:
2852:
2850:
2849:Don't cry COI
2847:
2845:
2842:
2840:
2837:
2835:
2832:
2830:
2827:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2817:
2815:
2812:
2810:
2809:Don't be rude
2807:
2805:
2802:
2800:
2797:
2795:
2792:
2790:
2787:
2785:
2782:
2780:
2777:
2775:
2772:
2770:
2767:
2765:
2762:
2760:
2757:
2755:
2754:Cyberbullying
2752:
2750:
2747:
2745:
2742:
2740:
2737:
2736:
2734:
2730:
2724:
2721:
2719:
2716:
2714:
2711:
2709:
2706:
2704:
2701:
2699:
2696:
2694:
2691:
2689:
2686:
2684:
2681:
2679:
2676:
2674:
2671:
2669:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2624:
2621:
2619:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2604:
2601:
2600:
2598:
2594:
2588:
2585:
2583:
2580:
2578:
2575:
2573:
2570:
2568:
2565:
2563:
2560:
2558:
2555:
2553:
2550:
2548:
2545:
2543:
2540:
2538:
2535:
2533:
2532:The last word
2530:
2528:
2527:The grey zone
2525:
2523:
2520:
2518:
2515:
2513:
2510:
2508:
2505:
2503:
2500:
2498:
2495:
2493:
2490:
2488:
2485:
2483:
2480:
2478:
2475:
2473:
2470:
2468:
2465:
2463:
2460:
2458:
2455:
2453:
2450:
2448:
2445:
2443:
2440:
2438:
2435:
2434:
2432:
2428:
2422:
2419:
2417:
2414:
2412:
2409:
2407:
2404:
2402:
2399:
2397:
2394:
2392:
2389:
2387:
2384:
2382:
2379:
2377:
2374:
2372:
2369:
2367:
2364:
2362:
2359:
2357:
2354:
2352:
2349:
2347:
2344:
2342:
2339:
2337:
2334:
2332:
2329:
2327:
2324:
2322:
2319:
2317:
2314:
2312:
2309:
2308:
2306:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2287:
2283:
2269:
2266:
2264:
2261:
2259:
2256:
2254:
2251:
2249:
2246:
2244:
2241:
2239:
2236:
2234:
2231:
2229:
2226:
2224:
2221:
2219:
2216:
2214:
2211:
2209:
2206:
2204:
2201:
2199:
2196:
2194:
2191:
2189:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2179:
2176:
2174:
2171:
2169:
2166:
2164:
2161:
2159:
2156:
2154:
2151:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2139:
2136:
2134:
2131:
2129:
2126:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2111:
2109:
2106:
2104:
2101:
2099:
2096:
2094:
2091:
2089:
2086:
2084:
2081:
2079:
2076:
2074:
2071:
2070:
2068:
2066:
2060:
2054:
2051:
2049:
2046:
2044:
2041:
2039:
2036:
2034:
2031:
2029:
2026:
2024:
2021:
2019:
2016:
2014:
2011:
2009:
2006:
2004:
2001:
1999:
1996:
1995:
1993:
1991:
1987:
1981:
1978:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1951:
1948:
1946:
1945:Walled garden
1943:
1941:
1938:
1936:
1933:
1931:
1928:
1926:
1923:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1913:
1911:
1908:
1906:
1903:
1901:
1898:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1833:
1831:
1828:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1811:
1808:
1806:
1803:
1801:
1798:
1796:
1793:
1791:
1788:
1786:
1783:
1781:
1778:
1776:
1773:
1771:
1770:Mine a source
1768:
1766:
1763:
1761:
1758:
1756:
1753:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1736:
1734:
1731:
1729:
1726:
1724:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1716:
1714:
1711:
1709:
1706:
1704:
1701:
1699:
1696:
1694:
1691:
1689:
1686:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1676:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1656:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1618:Concept cloud
1616:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1599:
1596:
1594:
1591:
1589:
1588:Cherrypicking
1586:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1576:
1574:
1571:
1569:
1566:
1564:
1561:
1559:
1556:
1554:
1551:
1549:
1546:
1544:
1541:
1539:
1536:
1534:
1531:
1529:
1526:
1524:
1521:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1501:
1499:
1496:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1488:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1473:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1448:
1446:
1443:
1441:
1438:
1436:
1433:
1431:
1428:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1420:Systemic bias
1418:
1416:
1413:
1411:
1408:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1388:
1386:
1383:
1381:
1378:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1363:
1361:
1358:
1356:
1353:
1351:
1348:
1346:
1343:
1341:
1338:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1328:
1326:
1323:
1321:
1318:
1316:
1313:
1311:
1308:
1306:
1303:
1301:
1298:
1296:
1293:
1291:
1288:
1286:
1283:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1224:
1217:
1210:
1205:
1203:
1198:
1196:
1191:
1190:
1187:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1147:
1142:
1139:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1093:
1086:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1068:
1060:
1058:
1056:
1049:
1047:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1030:
1028:
1021:
1019:
1013:Bold, discuss
1012:
1010:
1008:
1001:Discuss first
1000:
998:
990:
986:
985:
982:
974:
968:
965:
961:
956:
955:
951:
943:
939:
935:
931:
928:
927:
925:
922:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
901:
896:
895:
889:
885:
884:
881:
873:
867:
864:
861:
856:
853:
852:
848:
843:
839:
836:
832:
829:
824:
821:
819:
815:
811:
808:
807:
805:
801:
797:
793:
790:
786:
783:
780:
778:
774:
769:
766:
763:
762:
756:
755:WP:BRDDISCUSS
752:
749:
745:
744:
741:
733:
728:
725:
722:
719:
716:
713:
710:
706:
703:
700:
698:
692:
688:
684:
681:
680:
674:
670:
667:
663:
662:
659:
651:
646:
645:Be respectful
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
628:
625:
624:
618:
614:
611:
607:
606:
603:
595:
593:
590:
587:
583:
581:
573:
567:
564:
560:
556:
553:
549:
545:
542:
538:
535:
531:
530:
525:
522:
519:
516:BRD is not a
514:
512:
508:
503:
502:
497:
493:
491:
490:
482:
478:
477:
474:
466:
464:
458:
454:
450:
447:
444:
443:
442:
436:
433:
430:
426:
423:
419:
416:
413:
409:
406:
403:
402:
401:
398:
391:
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
372:
371:
370:
367:
359:
352:
347:
343:
340:
336:
333:
330:
329:
325:
322:
319:
316:
315:
311:
310:
302:
295:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
256:
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
223:
220:
218:
213:
211:
204:
202:
198:
194:
190:
183:is mandatory.
182:
181:
176:
175:
169:
160:
159:
154:
153:
148:
147:
142:
139:
132:
131:
116:
112:
109:
105:
104:
101:
96:
91:
87:
80:
78:
74:
70:
64:
57:
56:
51:
45:
39:
34:
19:
3952:About essays
3941:About essays
3848:Rouge editor
3798:Oops Defense
3578:Barnstaritis
3543:Assume faith
3365:Pokémon test
3210:High Schools
3032:WikiBullying
2996:Superhatting
2991:POV railroad
2688:Just drop it
2492:Nobody cares
2326:Divisiveness
1850:Printability
1743:Style guides
1577:
1533:Amnesia test
1390:Paraphrasing
1150:
1148:
1145:
1129:bold, refine
1128:
1124:
1114:
1105:
1096:edit warring
1092:edit summary
1089:
1057:
1053:
1045:
1041:Bold, refine
1034:
1025:
1016:
1004:
996:
975:Alternatives
941:
937:
929:
923:
913:
897:
874:Edit warring
865:
854:
849:Bold (again)
834:
830:
822:
817:
809:
791:
784:
770:
764:
726:
720:
714:
709:someone else
708:
704:
694:
682:
673:WP:BRDREVERT
644:
638:
632:
627:Stay focused
626:
591:
588:
584:
577:
552:common sense
523:
515:
510:
506:
504:
500:
499:
462:
440:
420:...you lose
412:unprotection
399:
395:
368:
364:
306:
290:edit warring
282:bogging down
277:
276:
260:alternatives
254:
252:
239:
236:edit summary
226:
224:
216:
214:
196:
192:
188:
186:
178:
172:
156:
150:
144:
140:
66:
3959:Essay guide
3843:Rouge admin
3410:Video links
3265:No big loss
2954:just madmen
2904:Don't shout
2678:How to lose
2673:Get over it
2457:Be the glue
2376:Negotiation
2233:Relist bias
2063:Removing or
1895:Stub Makers
1728:Law sources
1658:Don't panic
1175:Negotiation
1085:WP:Desserts
888:WP:NOTSTUCK
687:WP:PRESERVE
455:instead of
317:When to use
280:. To avoid
67:This is an
4050:Categories
4015:Guidelines
3783:No, really
3763:LTTAUTMAOK
3245:Make stubs
2966:No racists
2708:Say "MOBY"
2430:Philosophy
2303:The basics
1860:Publicists
1830:Presentism
1775:Merge Test
1760:Inaccuracy
1243:Philosophy
1123:Sometimes
906:disruptive
802:(see also
800:disruptive
779:guidelines
773:Wikiquette
771:Adhere to
617:WP:BRDBOLD
481:WP:BRD-NOT
222:outcome.
158:discussion
146:bold edits
71:about the
3493:Adminitis
3062:WikiPeace
3037:WikiCrime
3016:UPPERCASE
2396:Thank you
2028:Proseline
1820:Permastub
1385:Paradoxes
1300:Don't lie
1141:Let it go
804:rehashing
740:Shortcuts
658:Shortcuts
602:Shortcuts
353:Use cases
232:refine it
201:consensus
100:Shortcuts
48:See also
4010:Policies
3160:Coatrack
3057:WikiLove
3047:WikiHate
2961:No Nazis
2934:Griefing
2198:Immunity
1450:Trifecta
1280:Cohesion
1159:See also
1149:Several
1067:Shortcut
981:Shortcut
960:stalling
945:applied.
938:modified
930:Warning:
900:edit war
880:Shortcut
835:See also
777:civility
691:WP:PARTR
473:Shortcut
375:edit war
307:Compare
197:optional
152:reverted
115:WP:CYCLE
3673:Emerson
3513:ANI flu
2477:Failure
2316:Apology
2213:Nothing
1410:Purpose
1115:But see
942:24-hour
914:several
898:Do not
748:WP:BRDD
734:Discuss
666:WP:BRDR
610:WP:BRDB
574:Process
339:reverts
332:Be bold
255:Discuss
219:editing
143:Making
3155:Clones
2732:Don'ts
2653:Desist
2643:Candor
2552:Reader
1118:WP:QUO
1075:WP:BRR
989:WP:BRB
838:WP:QUO
652:Revert
227:Revert
108:WP:BRD
36:, see
2406:Truce
910:block
695:The "
509:bold
422:tempo
278:Cycle
79:pages
3678:Fart
3623:Crap
2008:Coup
1360:Need
775:and
596:Bold
569:BRD.
507:both
246:and
217:Bold
187:The
177:and
75:and
2596:Dos
1219:(?)
1106:Not
1098:.
934:3RR
550:or
511:and
240:not
205:not
193:BRD
4052::
1113:.
414:.)
292:.
250:.
81:.
46:.
40:.
1208:e
1201:t
1194:v
1120:.
1087:.
920:.
902:.
862:.
543:.
536:.
431:.
424:.
312:.
191:(
92:.
52:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
