211:
205:
See now I see no reason to get snippy about this. Many interwiki bots don't even bother to get approval here or don't know to. It's been pretty standard practice for interwiki bots to work for a while without approval and to later get speedy approval anyway. It's a formality to determine if a bot
206:
flag is necessary, which it usually is for these types of edits. I don't fault anyone for not being familar with the bot approval process here. Simple mistake. In addition, the bot immediately stopped when the complaint above was made, demonstrating good faith.
221:
a bot flag without need for a trial period. It already has a bot flag on the fr wikipedia and I looked at a sample of the edits so far and everything checked out. It should be run manually assisted always, as specified above. --
254:
21:
77:
72:
107:
92:
226:
199:
189:
67:
196:
34:
17:
186:
87:
82:
248:
223:
118:
210:
233:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
102:
97:
62:
239:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
49:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
255:Approved Knowledge (XXG) bot requests for approval
43:The following discussion is an archived debate.
217:(interwiki bot). This bot is approved to run
8:
185:Why was this bot put directly into trials?
145:(e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run)
138:Interwiki links on sport's articles.
7:
28:
209:
124:Automatic or Manually Assisted:
227:04:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
200:17:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
190:09:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
126:Manually Assisted (always)
271:
236:Please do not modify it.
130:Programming Language(s):
46:Please do not modify it.
164:Already has a bot flag
22:Requests for approval
154:Edit rate requested:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Bots
215:Speedily Approved
176:Function Details:
136:Function Summary:
262:
238:
213:
48:
270:
269:
265:
264:
263:
261:
260:
259:
245:
244:
243:
234:
183:
132:Pywikipediabot
113:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
268:
266:
258:
257:
247:
246:
242:
241:
203:
202:
182:
179:
142:Edit period(s)
112:
111:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
80:
75:
70:
65:
63:Approved BRFAs
60:
53:
52:
51:
39:
37:
32:
30:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
267:
256:
253:
252:
250:
240:
237:
231:
230:
229:
228:
225:
220:
216:
212:
207:
201:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
188:
180:
178:
177:
173:
171:
168:
165:
161:
159:
155:
151:
149:
146:
143:
139:
137:
133:
131:
127:
125:
121:
120:
117:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
55:
54:
50:
47:
41:
40:
36:
33:
31:
23:
19:
235:
232:
218:
214:
208:
204:
184:
175:
174:
169:
166:
163:
162:
157:
153:
152:
147:
144:
141:
140:
135:
134:
129:
128:
123:
122:
115:
114:
57:
45:
42:
29:
187:Betacommand
181:Discussion
156:4-5 edits
103:rights log
93:page moves
116:Operator:
98:block log
249:Category
160:minutes
73:contribs
20: |
195:Sorry.
119:Sebcaen
150:daily
167:(Y/N)
78:count
16:<
219:with
197:Botz
108:flag
88:logs
68:talk
58:BRFA
35:Botz
172:fr
158:per
83:SUL
251::
224:RM
170::
148::
110:)
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
