User talk:Citation bot - Knowledge (XXG)

2886:. The original publication of the book was as an issue of APL Quote Quad. Perhaps you have never subscribed to an ACM SIG newsletter and sometimes received surprise conference proceedings in your mailbox when the conference published its proceedings as an issue of the newsletter. I have. It used to be a standard way to publish the proceedings of minor ACM conferences (the major ones got a separately published proceedings volume). Maybe they separated them later and decided to give them separate dois. Did not the fact that they had identical page numbers give you any second thoughts? Who would reprint a whole conference proceedings as a second, separate publication, and why? — 850:? I can only speak for myself, but every time I cite such book webpages I am not citing the book itself. I am specifically referencing the information published on the webpage. So of course I do not want the citation to be changed to Cite book with a bunch of parameters of the book itself (ISBN, date, etc) added. So I inevitably stop the bot or replace the reference with a third-party source. I realise the defense will be "It doesn't hurt" or that some users are actually citing the book. And I realise this is not the most pressing issue, but why must the bot come to its own conclusion of the editor's intent? I see another user 2164:

dots.I'm sure not all of that awful example citation is Citation bot's fault: it doesn't typically add street addresses or access dates. It would be nice if we could have some sort of discussion somewhere about what is and isn't desirable for citation scripts to add to references, although I doubt anyone who isn't already active on this talkpage would care.And to answer your edit summary, no, he never checks on the results of his bot runs, and calls Citation bot so profusely that whenever I type "Abductive", my text prediction suggests "who never checks their work" from all the edit summaries I've left cleaning up after him.

565:{{cite journal |last1=Larivière |first1=Vincent |last2=Kiermer |first2=Véronique |last3=MacCallum |first3=Catriona J. |last4=McNutt |first4=Marcia |last5=Patterson |first5=Mark |last6=Pulverer |first6=Bernd |last7=Swaminathan |first7=Sowmya |last8=Taylor |first8=Stuart |last9=Curry |first9=Stephen |date=2016-07-05 |title=A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions |journal=bioRxiv |page=062109 |url=http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/062109 |language=en |doi=10.1101/062109 |hdl=1866/23301 |s2cid=64293941 |hdl-access=free}} 1679:(which more or less coincides with the modern MathSciNet online database, but genuinely used to be a journal) into cite book, replacing the given title for the review with the title of the book, after a previous pass of a bot (probably the same bot) helpfully and incorrectly added the book doi to the review references. In the process a CS1 error is generated because the citations to the wrong reference of the wrong type still have a leftover journal parameter. 55: 623:{{cite bioRxiv |last1=Larivière |first1=Vincent |last2=Kiermer |first2=Véronique |last3=MacCallum |first3=Catriona J. |last4=McNutt |first4=Marcia |last5=Patterson |first5=Mark |last6=Pulverer |first6=Bernd |last7=Swaminathan |first7=Sowmya |last8=Taylor |first8=Stuart |last9=Curry |first9=Stephen |date=2016-07-05 |title=A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions |language=en |biorxiv=10.1101/062109}} 2349:

to unilaterally make sweeping controversial decisions to match their own preference; I think that approach runs counter to the spirit of the Knowledge (XXG) project. In my opinion, every bit of metadata, especially anything added by bots, has to have some strong and clear benefit to justify the space it takes up, and just "it exists and some people sometimes like it" is not good enough reason to mass spam these site-wide. –

1782:

the original editor, resulting in wholly mixy-match metadata that can take twenty or thirty minutes to untangle.Whenever I find myself fixing citations that Citation bot has micrd up in this way (which can often as not be blamed on Crossref), I'll drop a hidden html comment so it ignores the citation in the future, but it would nice not to have to do that every time. However, bots sprinkling

1764:

added to citations (and we've seen such bugs, not just in this bot) and then later iterations take that as gospel and keep massaging the citation to more closely resemble that bad piece of the reference. One or two passes of Citation bot is usually an improvement. After that, further passes are as likely to break things and make more work for human editors as they are to make anything better.

2147:, Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. The purpose of citations is to help readers locate a source for particular claims being made in articles, and that's it. Any information beyond that should be carefully considered and balanced against the significant cost imposed on readers who don't care when we add extra links and opaque identifiers. 1910:

publisher's website linked from a DOI, and nothing else whatsoever. Adding these bibcodes to citations seems like a waste of space which is at best useless, or at worst wastes readers time. Sometimes bibcode links contain full text or some other useful information, so I wouldn't say bibcode should never be added, but it seems very unhelpful to add it just because it happens to exist. –

1381:

presented only with the paper title, formatted as a book title, falsely telling them both in visible appearance and reference metadata that the reference was to an entire book-length work. It is not merely that it is creating CS1 errors, although that is bad enough. It is also making the reference less accurate in both its metadata and in its visible appearance. —

1830:

drop themselves and each other little reminder notes using an invented parameter for the purpose.Unlike a few other problems that get mention on this talkpage, I don't have any clear idea how to prevent the sort of error described in this bug report. I forgot to type out some of my unclear bad ideas, probably due to being in an IRL conversation during the edit.

2341:– this is not sufficient justification to include every possible bibcode. It only offers a supporting reason to occasionally add a bibcode when it hosts a paper not available from the publisher or some other source which has the right to host it. If the bot cannot determine these cases programmatically, then it should leave it to humans to decide them. 2588:. This is something we must handle properly, not a weird one-off situation that we can handle by marking it as special. The situation that the citation templates do not make it easy or convenient to cite such things should not be exacerbated by the citation bot not understanding these things and lobotomizing the citations to fit its poor understanding. 2337:– or to be precise, a very significant undercount by more than an order of magnitude of how many papers cite it. If we just wanted that we should link Google scholar, but I don't think this information justifies any citation index link; it's not relevant to locating the paper, which is the primary purpose of Knowledge (XXG) citations. 1398:

sometimes actually fix up the citations myself. Few of the editors who call Citation bot on large sets of pages ever check in after it to see if it's causing errors, so typically no one notices my reverts.I saw a few weeks back that for one subset of conferences (IEEE maybe? or SPIE?) Citation bot has successfully been changing

2575:. It is not possible to simultaneously format it as a book and a periodical; I deliberately chose one, using cite journal to get most of the metadata correct and using department= to provide the remaining metadata, that this journal issue is a conference proceedings and the name of the proceedings. In the very next edit 2583:

edit-warred to restore the citation to its unfixed CS1 error state as a cite book with erroneous journal parameter, but now with an extra erroneous department parameter. Incidentally, all of the major computer graphics conferences and many database conferences now publish their conference proceedings

1781:

The reciprocal operation seems more common in my experience: DOIs to book reviews where the citation points to the reviewed book. Perhaps the least fun is where the same content is published originally in a journal and later as a book chapter, and the citation scripts pick the opposite publication to

1682:

As I keep saying, this is the type of damage that can be predicted to happen when bots run over the same reference over and over and over and over, probably making improvements on the first pass or two but also introducing minor mistakes that they then amplify into major mistakes until eventually the

964:

I couldn't find a list of tasks that the bot has been approved for (other than the very first approval) nor a thorough description of all of its mystical activities. I was surprised to find it would change "Cite web" to "Cite book" (for unclear reasons). The only cure, if the bot is unchanged, seems

927:

I cannot personally maintain that the majority of users citing a publisher's webpage are lazily intending to cite the book itself. My experience suggests otherwise which is why I have taken issue, but I realise my editing purview might be skewed. However, if that is observably true then I will resign

1759:

gradually became more and more borked, in the process resembling a reference to the reviewed work. The most recent pass of Citation bot took a reference that, by then, resembled a citation to a book and made it look more like a citation to the book. But that was only the latest step of this borkage.

2813:

Perhaps you failed to read my message. Perhaps you are unaware how annoying it is to put time and effort into cleaning up problems only to have some editor-with-bot fuck up the article in exactly the same way again. But regardless, you are incorrect. They are not two publications. They are a single

2348:

It's not about what I personally like, it's about what is worth spending very valuable Knowledge (XXG) readers' attention on. There is certainly no site-wide consensus about adding this type of metadata at every possible opportunity, so what you are really arguing for is that bot authors should get

1397:

I've gotten really exhausted with this category of error introduced by Citation bot, which I encounter every day I edit. I used to creep its contributions and clean up after it, but I've started just reverting its edits that cause this kind of template error, regardless of any value added, and only

845:

I have remained silent on this issue even though it has irritated me for a while now. And now that there is discussion above about the widespread useless cosmetic edits this bot continues to waste everyone's time with, I'll raise it: Why must every citation of a publisher's webpage be changed to to

3616:

I've brought up the issue of Citation Bot converting incorrect access-date parameters to osti-access before and it's been fixed for the specific cases, but it feels like a game of Whac-a-mole at this point. Is there a way to stop Citation Bot from changing any parameters to osti-access? Seems like

2227:

lists 1742 results, and I'm sure there are other citation indices including this paper in their graph. I don't think a list of citations alone is enough to justify the space it takes to linking any of these citation index pages (beyond the publisher page or sometimes a third-party page including a

2150:

I often feel like the main project of Citation bot and some of its friends and supporters is to turn the bottom of every Knowledge (XXG) page into a comprehensive bibliographic cross-reference of citation index identifiers. But in my opinion this is not what Knowledge (XXG) is for, and they really

2001:

The bibcodes I'm talking about are opaque IDs pointing at a web page which includes: author, title, journal name/issue, date, page numbers, DOI (all included already in the wikipedia citation), plus an abstract (included on the DOI page), but no other information at all. I don't see any benefit to

1763:

The problem here is not the individual edit. The problem is that when bots repeatedly replace and replace and replace bits of citations, without intelligence or oversight, they have a tendency to amplify their earlier mistakes. All it takes is a month or two of a bug where bad dois or bad hdls get

1829:

I think I skipped a step where I typed out the immediately rejected ideas of scripts keeping track of which citations they had previously edited (too resource intensive), or checking revision histories for their own activity (ditto). Then I leapt straight into rejecting the third idea, where bots

870:

This may be the kind of situation where it's safest to explicitly tell citation bot not to muck with the citation. It's hard to automatically judge whether the human editor actually wanted "cite web" or "cite book". (There are many examples of people using "cite web" to cite resources that should

2661:

It's interesting that cite conference allows both conference= and journal=, and that would also be an acceptable way of formatting the citation, but it doesn't format the citation as a publication in a periodical the way cite journal does. (It spells out the volume and issue instead of using the

2163:

Agree that Bibcode feels like the worst offender of the unnecessary stable identifiers, mostly due to aesthetics: s2cid is equally useless (unless we count doing Semantic Scholar's work for them) but at least they're not an almost intelligible word followed by a mishmash of letters, numbers, and

1952:

Which useful information is it that they contain, exactly? How does such a knowing person "use" them? PMIDs are also often useless, I agree. Adding an extra half-dozen opaque identifiers which all point to the same identical information does a disservice to readers and is harmful to the project

1909:

Citation Bot has recently been adding more bibcodes to various citations, but nearly every time I click through the bibcode turns out to contain zero new information. That is, the bibcode has some metadata already included in the Knowledge (XXG) citation plus an abstract already included at the

1418:

without introducing errors and growing the backlogs. So there has been a partial fix, but it's pretty frustrating that this known error has been perpetuated in thousands of edits spanning months.Citation bot does not have an approved BRFA task to change citation template types, and changing to

1218:

I find the bot's edit summary "Changed bare reference" to be significantly misleading. This is not a bare-url reference. It is a well-formatted reference that happens to be manually formatted. Where is there any guideline or policy suggesting that such references are a problem that needs to be

1102:

it isn't just me... The ?seq code might be taking us & other registered editors to the exact page because we have a JSTOR account through the WP Library I guess... But even if people don't have a JSTOR account the *code* should be left there, otherwise the URL seems useless. I like to give

1380:

INCORRECT. It is creating an error, because formerly readers could see the paper title, see the book title (called a journal, but still formatted in italics the way readers would expect a book title to look), and see that it was a paper in a book with that title. After the edit, readers were

905:

for clarity. In the specific case you've linked just above, another option would be not to cite the publisher's landing page at all, and add the book to a "Selected works" subsection or something. Indeed, the altered citation is sequential to another one, and so seems a bit superfluous. Or,

1986:

codes are useful to people with subscription access to MathSciNet (who are shown reviews of the works) but useless to non-subscribers (who get a landing page with a bare citation). In such cases I don't think Knowledge (XXG) is capable of determining which readers can make use of the id.

912:

above.Given the overall lazy referencing culture of less experienced editors, it's likely that in the majority of cases, people who drop a link to a publisher landing page are probably trying to cite the book itself, so this behaviour of assuming that's the case is net beneficial.

3304:

It appears that this happens when there is a broken Google Books URL in a template. The edit summary says "Removed URL that duplicated identifier", but there was no other information in the template other than the page number. The bot should probably just do nothing in this

3118:

Although I agree that the bot's edit was bad, maybe the bot was confused by doi:10.5040/9781472597540.0007 which looks like it should go to chapter 7 within the book (whatever title that chapter might have)? doi:10.5040/9781472597540 appears to refer to the entire book.

1953:

overall, because it makes the citations harder to read and forces readers to carefully sift through chaff to find the links they are looking for. Anyone who cares about these identifiers for their own sake, for whatever reason, can find them absolutely trivially. –

1965:

Perhaps it would be useful to add an invisible-by-default view for all of these extra identifiers which could be revealed in CSS to the trivial number of "others who know how to use them" without needing to shove a bunch of line noise in everyone else's face.

2228:

preprint or similar). Anyone who wants to hop around the literature graph starting from this paper, as part of their research process, is capable of going to their preferred citation index and typing in the title or other basic metadata to find this paper. –

1201:? A human might do this but a bot automatically doing it is completely something else, especially in cases such as here where it does not even improve the consistency of formatting (the article is still a mix of CS1, CS2, and manually-formatted references). 628:

Larivière, Vincent; Kiermer, Véronique; MacCallum, Catriona J.; McNutt, Marcia; Patterson, Mark; Pulverer, Bernd; Swaminathan, Sowmya; Taylor, Stuart; Curry, Stephen (2016-07-05). "A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions".

3386:

references an online-only supplement that is not in the journal and therefore not in the article's page range. I suspect this is rare enough to not need any bot code changes, or if there's a better way to input the citation template I am all ears.

2192:

The Bibcode link does provide information about what the paper cites and what has cited it. Whether or not the DOI resolves to a page that also provides such information depends upon the journal and publisher (that stuff is paywalled by default on

1978:

Perhaps there should be some way of distinguishing bibcodes or other ids that provide useful information (like full article text) from the ones that merely point to other ids, so that the useful ones can be shown and the useless ones can be

1117:

Actually currently JSTOR thinks it is providing me access through UT Dallas, I guess because I was there for a conference last summer. But yes, this should be left in place, like the pg= parameter of Google Books links, for the same reason.

2814:

publication, of a paper in a conference proceedings in a journal. Conference proceedings get published in journals, all the time. Get over it and stop making work for others when you don't understand things. That goes for the bot, too. —

2942:

Congratulations, wonderful robot! I see you have helped us improve article citations over 5 million times!! That's a very impressive milestone, IMHO, and we are so glad to help your help. Bravo you, and keep up the good work. Best,

2622:

supports both book and journal parameters. That's what I use to cite conference proceedings published as special journal issues. Not sure why Citation bot doesn't. Would certainly be a quicker fix than publisher by publisher. Also,

3482:

I think Citation bot is to aggressive in it's capitalization of every three-/four-letter combinations and words following a dot. Also on other references it many times incorrectly capitalizes words inside parentheses.

1443:

a year ago. The easiest thing would be if support were readded, but that seems highly unlikely. I do think that eventually, if this bug isn't fixed, I'll end up asking BAG to ban Citation bot changing template type to

1351:

was wrong before. That the bot didn't manage to fix it doesn't make it a new error. Now the error is reported. This is an improvement, even though ideally the bot would be able to figure out and fix the error itself.

2240:

It's not comprehensive, for sure; in my experience, the thoroughness varies by field. The only point I wanted to make is that it provides more than absolutely nothing. (Also, I kind of like bibcodes just because they

1923:

Bibcodes always contain useful information. Like every other identifiers, iIf you don't like them, ignore them. That doesn't make them useless to others who know how to use them. No different than PMIDs in medicine.

1001:. That bit of code give the Page # within the larger cite, so why does Citation bot remove it? It makes sense to me to leave that bit of code in there but the bot doesn't seem to think so. It's removed it twice, once 1103:

readers the option of going down the rabbithole of verifiability if they want to. Why is WP giving readers an URL that is to the entire book or article as the Citation bot default when the bot is run on the article?

2093:

The publisher and their location are not essential or even useful information to include in journal citations like this when we can include them in a wiki page about the journal (though frankly even a wikilink to

2417:

Not that. There is no reason to use cite web when the citation template works ok. In this case it could have been cite report if the bot were more intelligent, but that's above and beyond the bug in question

2848:) and the core of the issue is that you've mixed the journal DOI with the book ISBN. These two should not be present in the same citation. That you insist that they are is the root cause of your issues. 2411:

the bot turned a bare-url reference, in an article all of whose many templated references were in Citation Style 2 (some using cite templates with mode=cs2), into a cite web template in Citation Style 1

1322:

Creating a new CS1 error where there was none before, because it left the paper title in the book title parameter and did not change the journal parameter to a book title parameter: doubleplusungood.

1266:

I mix manually formatted citations and template-formatted citations on pages all the time, deliberately. I would be extremely annoyed if a bot took it upon itself to change that deliberate decision. —

887:

is completely useless and actually corrupts my intention of the citation. Call me crazy but I don't want or need a bot telling me what I am citing (and actively altering my citations accordingly).

2220: 1767:

We need some sort of cone of shame that can stop the bots from continuing to worry the same sore spots over and over, without keeping them away from new citations in need of bot cleanup. —

3236:– the correction of a non-error generates a different non-error – but for consistency I'm wondering why change some of the parameters but not all? (Haven't verified whether ∅ → 1 leaves 415:. The bot is pointing out the problem with the template. The solution is to choose one of the two parameters and remove the other one, or to convert it to an appropriate parameter. A 2958:

For all the problems I've had with / cleanup I've done after Citation bot, its work is overwhelmingly positive, and it's far and away the least problematic of the citation scripts.

570:

Larivière, Vincent; Kiermer, Véronique; MacCallum, Catriona J.; McNutt, Marcia; Patterson, Mark; Pulverer, Bernd; Swaminathan, Sowmya; Taylor, Stuart; Curry, Stephen (2016-07-05).

942:

In fairness to your point, I haven't looked into the data about how frequently this sort of change is appropriate; it could be the case that my own perspective is the skewed one.

1827:

some sort of cone of shame that can stop the bots from continuing to worry the same sore spots over and over, without keeping them away from new citations in need of bot cleanup.

1136: 2767:

Hagamen, W.; Berry, P. C.; Iverson, K. E.; Weber, J. C. (1989). "Processing natural language syntactic and semantic mechanisms". In Kertész, Ádám; Shaw, Lynne C. (eds.).

1525:

When citing doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202123104001, the bot interprets "article number" as a page number. (Unsure if a bug or a metadata issue, but reporting just in case.)

1607:

If someone can find an article with proper meta-data, then I can look into doing this. So far, all the complaints have had the data listed as a page in crossref.

1683:

reference is totally garbled. The whole process of repeatedly polishing citations so many times needs to be rethought. Get it right the first time and then stop.

2529:

Undoes DELIBERATE formatting of conference-proceedings-in-journal-special issue as cite journal, violating CITEVAR and reintroducing previously-fixed CS1 errors

3573:

If "pages" is set to the first page and only the first page, then the bot fixes that. I the correct parameter "page" is used, then the bot does not fix that.

2002:

anyone in clicking through to such a page, unless someone's goal is to find the bibcode itself for some (obscure, niche, irrelevant to wikipedia) purpose.

2705:(bullet #2), not block the bot on the entire article. Second, the issue here is that you're trying to have two citations in one. The first is from the 1760:

Sometime longer ago a bot planted a turd in the citation and then the bots kept on polishing it, making it shinier and shinier but not any less smelly.

2100:

has only marginal value here), but the bibcode especially is pointless, because when we click through we find the following info on the bibcode page:

883:

I understand. But it still feels like an another unnecessary task for this bot to insert itself into every article it can possibly find. For example,

1328:

Posting as a message rather than a new bug because this is not a new bug. It is an old bug that has been ignored far too long by the developers (see

1860:

As far as I can tell this has no practical advantage at all, and only serves to make the opaque identifier take up more space at readers' expense. –

2851:

I'll flip things back on you, because you clearly are unaware of how annoying it is to be accused of bad faith behaviour get reflexively reverted

2900:

They have identical publication dates (1 July 1989) as well as page numbers, and both PDFs are marked with "APL QUOTE QUAD" in the page footers.

3320:

Those worthless urls do get deleted by the bot. I will look at logging those to go back and fix. The log message is a bit off, that it clear.

2584:

as special issues of journals (and have done so for years), and there are many older programming language conference proceedings published in

2567:, one of the references is to a paper in the "Conference proceedings on APL as a tool of thought - APL '89", published in a special issue of 3134: 3168: 3086: 411:

to citation templates by this bot is a feature. When there are two identical parameters in a citation template, the bot renames one to

2178:

I think Citation bot backed off on s2cids, or at least I haven't found as many being added recently. (If so, thanks for the change!) –

1024:

Also, if by some chance I am correct, is there any way to stop people from running the Bot needlessly on this supposed issue? Thanks,

2216: 2211:

The list of citing papers at a bibcode link is extremely incomplete though. For example, for this particular paper the bibcode page

339: 333: 327: 321: 315: 309: 303: 297: 291: 285: 279: 273: 267: 261: 255: 249: 243: 237: 231: 225: 219: 206: 200: 194: 188: 182: 176: 170: 164: 158: 1469:

Still ongoing failure to remove journal= from conversions to cite book, creating new CS1 errors and wasted time for human editors:

2718:

Hagamen, W.; Berry, P. C.; Iverson, K. E.; Weber, J. C. (1989). "Processing natural language syntactic and semantic mechanisms".

1511: 152: 146: 140: 134: 128: 122: 116: 110: 104: 98: 3594: 2909: 2028: 1140: 732:

Wolf, Luise; Silander, Olin K.; Van Nimwegen, Erik J. (2014). "Expression noise facilitates the evolution of gene regulation".

41: 3155: 3046: 2999: 2864: 2794: 2775: 2743: 2316: 1934: 1714: 1362: 1292: 1248: 1048: 669: 2258: 2206: 2306:

don't personally like Bibcode or find it useful is not a reason to deprive the reader of easy access to this ressource.

1621:

This might require a white list of DOIs or page styles to just convert over, since most databases do not differentiate.

1189:

I asked this in the discussion of an earlier bug but it was archived without providing an answer. Can you please explain

419:

error means that the bot is overloaded and you should try again later – wait at least 15 minutes and then complain here.

1812: 1594: 933: 892: 860: 2883: 503:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Congenital_cartilaginous_rest_of_the_neck&diff=prev&oldid=1199200383

356: 3578: 3503: 3325: 3130: 2891: 2819: 2667: 2616: 2549: 2393: 1992: 1892: 1878: 1772: 1740: 1661: 1626: 1612: 1478: 1386: 1337: 1271: 1228: 1162: 1123: 1089: 3559: 3533: 3250: 2917: 2576: 2572: 2484: 1808: 1590: 1531: 1470: 1198: 3122: 2122: 929: 888: 856: 518: 403:

is open source and interested parties are invited to assist with the operation and extension of the bot.

2905: 2627: 2571:, a periodical. It had a cite conference format but a journal= parameter, a CS1 error, which I fixed in 2494: 2474: 2254: 2202: 1557: 1402: 829: 819: 723: 713: 699: 555: 527: 31: 3652: 3059: 3012: 2296: 2292: 2284: 2032: 1507: 1108: 1075: 1029: 1014: 978: 852:

Book:_I_don't_think_that_it_was_right_in_this_case..." title="User talk:Citation bot/Archive 32": -->

771: 733: 630: 508: 3679:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Exchange_interaction&diff=1246891180&oldid=1234328040

1210:

we made a deliberate decision that the citation templates were inadequate for some specific citation

1194: 490: 3574: 3499: 3321: 3196: 3126: 2963: 2924: 2887: 2815: 2690: 2663: 2652: 2609: 2545: 2464: 2389: 2353: 2232: 2182: 2169: 2155: 1988: 1970: 1957: 1914: 1888: 1874: 1864: 1835: 1791: 1768: 1736: 1657: 1622: 1608: 1474: 1459: 1429:

has been the one that's particularly fraught and error-prone ever since support for the aliases of

1382: 1333: 1267: 1224: 1158: 1119: 1099: 1085: 947: 918: 875: 455: 396: 3163: 3054: 3007: 2872: 2802: 2324: 2212: 1942: 1722: 1370: 1300: 1256: 1056: 864: 677: 3529: 3488: 3416: 3151: 3042: 2995: 2860: 2790: 2641: 2564: 2504: 2312: 2288: 2235: 2066:"Direct and Inverse Solutions of Geodesics on the Ellipsoid with Application of Nested Equations" 2014:"Direct and Inverse Solutions of Geodesics on the Ellipsoid with Application of Nested Equations" 1930: 1735:

The majority of that reference is to the book itself (DOI, ISBN, volume, etc) and not the MR.

1710: 1448: 1437: 1423: 1412: 1358: 1288: 1244: 1197:

for Citation bot to convert manually-formatted references into templates, as it is doing e.g. at

1044: 847: 665: 597: 362: 3391: 2271: 2224: 2103:

Direct and Inverse Solutions of Geodesics on the Ellipsoid with Application of Nested Equations

3547:

The bot changed a specified page number to a page range reflecting the entirety of the source.

3354: 2772: 2740: 2702: 2701:

First, if you do something deliberately weird, then the 'solution', so to speak, is to follow

2680: 2518: 2455: 2446: 2436: 2061: 2009: 1821:

Sorry. I was workshopping ideas of how to slow down or arrest the process of citation scripts

1569: 970: 799: 646: 537: 3159: 3050: 3003: 2868: 2798: 2320: 2005:

As a concrete example, here is a Knowledge (XXG) citation after Citation bot added a bibcode:

1938: 1718: 1366: 1296: 1252: 1052: 673: 2948: 2901: 2841: 2829: 2747: 2727: 2706: 2250: 2198: 2130: 2082: 2040: 790: 780: 587: 579: 377: 358: 54: 3024:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Toxic_heavy_metal&diff=prev&oldid=1242794946

2144: 3648: 2769:

APL '89 Conference Proceedings: APL as a tool of thought; New York City, August 7–10, 1989

1503: 1104: 1071: 1025: 1010: 994: 974: 471: 17: 1347:

It's not creating error, it's flagging errors that were already there, but not reported.

514:

Use GET instead of POST for better proxy caches when talking to data-bases when possible.

463:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Friern_Hospital&diff=prev&oldid=1167644213

2036: 1066:

It isn't the same for me... The one without the ?seq lands me on the main page, the URL

3267:

Weird edge case resulted in removing Google Books URL with no other information present

3192: 2959: 2921: 2687: 2648: 2350: 2229: 2179: 2165: 2152: 1967: 1954: 1911: 1861: 1831: 1787: 1455: 943: 914: 872: 794: 759: 501:

journal/publisher that only differ by 'and' and '&' should be treated as identical

449: 3484: 3412: 3388: 3351: 3147: 3038: 2991: 2856: 2786: 2580: 2308: 2096: 2073: 1926: 1706: 1354: 1284: 1240: 1150: 1133: 1040: 661: 481: 388: 906:

alternatively, use "Citation bot bypass" somewhere in your citation as suggested by

600: 3469:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Plucheeae&diff=prev&oldid=1246081258

392: 2270:

It also contains how many papers cite it, and how this varies over the year (e.g.

1454:. Disabling the functionality would be an improvement over the current situation. 1675:

Converts correct cite journal, describing a book review published in the journal

1238:

There's already citation templates on that page. No CITEVAR violation happened.

1212:, do we now have to start explicitly locking the bots out of articles altogether? 1018: 2944: 1753:

After multiple passes of citation-cleaning bots including Citation bot and OAbot

1704:

where a reference to MR is confused to a reference to the work reviewed by MR.

1084:

Yes, I also see the preview page showing page 9 of 17 with the ?seq parameter. —

810: 2134: 2086: 2065: 2044: 2013: 571: 495: 3233: 1983: 1539:

Cite doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202123104001 using cite journal and run Citation Bot.

1154: 998: 659:

To be extra safe, this should only be done when the DOI starts with 10.1101.

2637:, so I'm not sure why conference proceedings keep getting mistranslated into 360: 2373:

Adds cs1-formatted reference to article whose references are entirely in cs2

2283:

But additionally, bibcodes will also often contain/host papers itself (e.g.

3715: 3656: 3582: 3537: 3507: 3492: 3420: 3329: 3287: 3200: 2967: 2952: 2927: 2895: 2877: 2823: 2807: 2693: 2671: 2656: 2553: 2397: 2356: 2329: 2185: 2173: 2158: 1996: 1973: 1960: 1947: 1917: 1896: 1882: 1867: 1839: 1816: 1795: 1776: 1744: 1727: 1665: 1630: 1616: 1598: 1515: 1482: 1463: 1390: 1375: 1341: 1305: 1275: 1261: 1232: 1166: 1144: 1127: 1112: 1093: 1079: 1061: 1033: 982: 951: 937: 922: 896: 878: 802: 682: 3498:

specific issues fixed. some special code for parentheses does need added

3065: 1887:

I don't understand your reply. Can you clarify? I agree with jacobolus.

1204:

For those of us who might deliberately format references manually because

572:"A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions" 435: 35: 2845: 2833: 2751: 2731: 2710: 1786:

or suchlike all over doesn't feel like a super premium solution either.

785: 400: 3450:|title=Phylogenetic Placement and Circumscription of Tribes Inuleae s. 3431:|title=Phylogenetic Placement and Circumscription of Tribes Inuleae s. 2123:

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1975SurRv..23...88V/PUB_HTML

519:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/m8W2AgAAQBAJ?gbpv=1&pg=PA379

592: 1905:

Can we please not add bibcode when it contains no useful information?

1009:, so maybe I'm wrong... Would appreciate some clarification. Thanks, 3458:

Plucheeae (Asteraceae): Evidence from Sequences of Chloroplast Gene

3439:

Plucheeae (Asteraceae): Evidence from Sequences of Chloroplast Gene

507:

Free archive.org links such as curl -sH "Accept: application/json" "

775: 737: 634: 583: 2151:

have no community mandate to impose this vision across the site. –

509:

https://scholar.archive.org/search?q=doi:10.1080/14786449908621245

2140:

There is literally no new useful information at the bibcode link.

750:{{cite journal |biorxiv=10.1101/007237 |doi=10.7554/eLife.05856}} 491:

https://www.crossref.org/blog/news-crossref-and-retraction-watch/

3732:

Use a parameter that actually exists (in this case, trans-title)

3066:

Don't replace |title= with |chapter= when not adding a new title

2277: 2245:

alphanumeric-punctuation mishmashes. They give a bibliography a

908: 2267:

As XOR'easter says, "but no other information at all" is wrong.

1070:

the ?seq=9" lands me on the exact page with the quoted text...

760:"Expression noise facilitates the evolution of gene regulation" 3145:

Probably caused by the chapter and booktitle being the same.

1215:

Where is this included in the BAG-approved tasks for this bot?

363: 48: 3232:.None of these combinations actually confuse the aliasing in 2920:, without consensus/discussion, seems way, way out of line. – 1319:: Good (although would have been better as cite conference). 901:

When I've quoted publisher blurbs in the past, I usually set

841:

Changing every citation of a publisher's webpage to Cite book

3672:

Nothing, or copy the proper text to the title/journal fields

3103:

The title should be kept as is to avoid creating a CS1 error

2291:), and point to preprints, and related papers (for example, 1823:

repeatedly replace and replace and replace bits of citations

1582:

for article numbers and should not be shoehorning them into

399:), can go weeks without logging in to Knowledge (XXG). The 3617:

it's pretty uncommon that that's actually what's intended.

758:

Wolf, Luise; Silander, Olin K.; Van Nimwegen, Erik (2015).

851: 2112:

Publication: Survey Review, vol. 23, issue 176, pp. 88-93

693:|journal=medRxiv: The Preprint Server for Health Sciences 436:

submit a pull request with appropriate code fix on GitHub

3224:

in the presence of a second (or more) author, it leaves

1755:, what was originally a reference purely to a review in 3725: 3678: 3611: 3604: 3468: 3383: 3370: 3297: 3096: 3023: 2852: 2408: 1702: 1317: 1006: 1002: 989:

Why is Citation Bot removing a page # from a cite's URL

884: 502: 462: 427: 743:

says "Now published in eLife doi: 10.7554/eLife.05856"

1873:

Looking for 13 ISBN leads to more google hits oddly.

2686:

supported something like a "conference" parameter. –

2129:

Where the latter link just points the same place as

450:

https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U192476

3587: 2828:Clearly these have been published both in a book ( 1578:with an assigned value). The bot should be using 551:, the bot should convert the citation to a proper 517:Start to convert Google Books URL to "new" format 549:|journal=bioRxiv: The Preprint Server for Biology 2442:being added in the edit if every other cite was 1316:Changing an incorrect cite journal to cite book 434:Or, for a faster response from the maintainers, 2854:without understanding what it is you reverted. 2703:User:Citation bot#Stopping the bot from editing 1982:But this may be reader-dependent. For instance 971:User:Citation_bot#Stopping_the_bot_from_editing 928:to accepting this as a forgivable externality. 1038:The landing page is the same in either case. 32:how to prevent the bot from repeating mistakes 3666:Bot replaces citation with garbage characters 3633:Bot replaces citation with garbage characters 3336:Probably an edge case that's not worth fixing 1206:we don't want bots messing with our citations 1153:. I just undid the edit the bot had done at @ 811:https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1101/007237 371:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 3177:Partial enumeration (maybe not really a bug) 2514:added to them instead of being converted to 2057:If it were up to me, this should instead be: 1329: 871:actually be books, journal articles, etc.) – 609:|author/last/first/date/year/title/language= 496:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25497/ 2916:Canceling deliberate bot exclusions, as in 2276:So far this is no different than including 1825:, and what it might implement like to have 3120: 1282:It should however, preserve the editors. 997:, Citation bot removes "?seq=9" from this 85: 73: 3060:_Page_when_there_is_only_one_page-1": --> 2432:It should be enough to do a pass for new 2215:110 results whereas the publisher's page 1856:can we please not "Upgrade ISBN10 to 13"? 1185:CITEVAR and manually formatted references 793: 784: 774: 736: 719:that is fully published, convert it to a 633: 591: 467:Implement support to convert cite web to 3588:Don't change parameters to |osti-access= 3244:, but it might show the same behaviour.) 2027:(176). Kingston Road, Tolworth, Surrey: 3013:_Page_when_there_is_only_one_page": --> 2882:Ok, now this is rising to the level of 1554:I have raised this issue in the past. 3449: 3430: 3241: 3237: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3218: 3214: 3211: 2662:abbreviated format of cite journal.) — 2634: 2511: 2342: 2338: 2334: 1826: 1822: 1801: 1783: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1563: 1430: 1348: 902: 692: 688: 653: 616: 612: 608: 548: 544: 511:" | jq -r .results.fulltext.access_url 381:when more than 4 sections are present. 1749:You are completely missing the point. 7: 3695:Use |trans-title, not |trans-article 2579:, Citation bot under the control of 840: 438:, if you can write the needed code. 405:Before reporting a bug, please note: 2299:is the 2nd paper in a series of 3). 1488:"Page" parameter acting incorrectly 2771:. New York, NY: ACM. pp. 184–189. 1641:Mathematical Reviews is not a book 967: 853:complained of this issue last year 25: 1332:, above). It needs to be fixed. — 448:Implement support to expand from 375:may be automatically archived by 3335: 2975:Page when there is only one page 1349:|journal=FM 2014: Formal Methods 53: 2460:. The exception should be that 2029:Directorate of Overseas Surveys 1137:2409:4070:4381:EF12:0:0:1BF5:A5 3716:02:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC) 3657:02:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC) 3595:18:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3583:12:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3538:04:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 3508:14:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 3493:19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3421:19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3392:06:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 3355:06:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 3169:17:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 2339:"bibcodes will also often ..." 2219:750 results, Semantic Scholar 1897:06:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1800:There is no such parameter as 1483:06:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 1167:06:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 879:01:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC) 865:22:25, 27 September 2023 (UTC) 1: 3330:20:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 3288:07:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 3201:18:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 3087:06:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC) 2223:1219 results, Google Scholar 1312:STILL creating new CS1 errors 1193:How is it not a violation of 2118:Bibcode: 1975SurRv..23...88V 1804:. What did you really mean? 983:04:12, 6 December 2023 (UTC) 952:08:32, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 938:06:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 923:22:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 897:21:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC) 498:set NLM_APIKEY and NLM_EMAIL 3061:20:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 3014:20:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 2968:09:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 2953:23:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2928:07:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2910:23:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2896:05:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2878:05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2824:04:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2808:03:16, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2694:07:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2672:01:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2657:01:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2554:01:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 1883:00:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 1631:14:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 1617:19:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 3757: 2135:10.1179/sre.1975.23.176.88 2087:10.1179/sre.1975.23.176.88 2045:10.1179/sre.1975.23.176.88 1145:12:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC) 619:, and throw the rest away. 26: 18:Knowledge (XXG):CITEBOTREQ 3738:Feedback from maintainers 3686:Feedback from maintainers 3624:Feedback from maintainers 3567:Feedback from maintainers 3476:Feedback from maintainers 3377:Feedback from maintainers 3311:Feedback from maintainers 3258:Feedback from maintainers 3210:When Citation bot alters 3109:Feedback from maintainers 3031:Feedback from maintainers 2720:ACM SIGAPL APL Quote Quad 2600:Feedback from maintainers 2423:Feedback from maintainers 2398:21:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 2357:04:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 2335:"how many papers cite it" 2330:00:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 2259:19:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 2236:00:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC) 2207:23:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2186:20:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2174:20:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 2159:19:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1997:19:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1974:19:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1961:19:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1948:04:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1918:04:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC) 1868:23:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC) 1695:Feedback from maintainers 1545:Feedback from maintainers 1464:00:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 1391:23:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1376:23:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1342:23:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1306:23:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC) 1276:23:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC) 1262:23:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC) 1233:20:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC) 1128:17:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 1113:15:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 1094:08:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 1080:04:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 1062:04:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 1034:03:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 1019:03:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 809:New DOI is in crossref. 683:08:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 46:documentation in general. 3301:Replication instructions 2197:websites, for example). 1840:17:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 1817:16:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 1796:16:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 1777:19:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 1745:00:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 1728:20:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 1666:06:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 1599:17:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 1536:Replication instructions 1516:16:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 1330:#Causing template errors 969:mechanism documented at 3251:Special:Diff/1244047255 2918:special:diff/1240206999 2739:The second is from the 2577:Special:Diff/1239895881 2573:Special:Diff/1238853961 2297:2007A&A...470..685L 1532:Special:Diff/1231943551 1471:Special:Diff/1245112056 1199:Special:Diff/1216926071 903:|type=publisher's blurb 3735:We can't proceed until 3683:We can't proceed until 3621:We can't proceed until 3564:We can't proceed until 3514:Unnecessary page range 3473:We can't proceed until 3374:We can't proceed until 3308:We can't proceed until 3255:We can't proceed until 3106:We can't proceed until 3028:We can't proceed until 2758:.75170 vs 10.1145/7514 2597:We can't proceed until 2420:We can't proceed until 1692:We can't proceed until 1542:We can't proceed until 3485:Jonatan Svensson Glad 3413:Jonatan Svensson Glad 1802:|script-embargo-date= 1784:|script-embargo-date= 1701:This is likely about 336:(Dec 2023 – May 2024) 330:(Oct 2023 – Dec 2023) 324:(Aug 2023 – Oct 2023) 318:(Apr 2023 – Aug 2023) 312:(Oct 2022 – Apr 2023) 306:(Jul 2022 – Oct 2022) 300:(May 2022 – Jul 2022) 294:(Mar 2022 – May 2022) 288:(Dec 2021 – Mar 2022) 282:(Dec 2021 – Dec 2021) 276:(Oct 2021 – Dec 2021) 270:(Aug 2021 – Sep 2021) 264:(Jun 2021 – Aug 2021) 258:(Apr 2021 – Jun 2021) 252:(Dec 2020 – Apr 2021) 246:(Sep 2020 – Dec 2020) 240:(Jul 2020 – Sep 2020) 234:(May 2020 – Jul 2020) 228:(Mar 2020 – May 2020) 222:(Oct 2019 – Mar 2020) 209:(Aug 2019 – Oct 2019) 203:(Jul 2019 – Aug 2019) 197:(Jun 2019 – Jul 2019) 191:(Mar 2019 – Jun 2019) 185:(Feb 2019 – Mar 2019) 179:(Jan 2019 – Feb 2019) 173:(Nov 2018 – Jan 2019) 167:(Oct 2018 – Nov 2018) 161:(Sep 2018 – Oct 2018) 155:(Aug 2018 – Aug 2018) 149:(Jul 2018 – Aug 2018) 143:(Oct 2017 – Jul 2018) 137:(Sep 2017 – Oct 2017) 131:(Oct 2016 – Sep 2017) 125:(Jul 2016 – Oct 2016) 119:(Nov 2015 – Jul 2016) 113:(Jun 2011 – Nov 2015) 107:(May 2008 – Jun 2011) 3675:Relevant diffs/links 3556:Relevant diffs/links 3465:Relevant diffs/links 3367:Relevant diffs/links 3247:Relevant diffs/links 2676:It would be nice if 2115:Pub Date: April 1975 1757:Mathematical Reviews 1677:Mathematical Reviews 1528:Relevant diffs/links 607:The bot should keep 523:When encountering a 387:Note that the bot's 342:(May 2024 – present) 2846:10.1145/75145.75170 2834:10.1145/75144.75170 2752:10.1145/75144.75170 2732:10.1145/75145.75170 2711:10.1145/75145.75170 2586:ACM SIGPLAN Notices 2289:1995ApJS..100..473K 2121:FULL TEXT SOURCES: 2037:1975SurRv..23...88V 988: 786:10.7554/eLife.05856 746:So TNT the citation 695:and convertions to 431:to report an error. 422:Submit a Bug Report 101:(Early bug reports) 3729:What should happen 3669:What should happen 3608:What should happen 3550:What should happen 3446:What should happen 3361:What should happen 3186:new bug or not-bug 3100:What should happen 3020:What should happen 2754:(note 10.1145/7514 2591:What should happen 2565:Kenneth E. Iverson 2414:What should happen 2062:Vincenty, Thaddeus 2010:Vincenty, Thaddeus 1686:What should happen 709:If encountering a 3714: 3286: 3138: 3125:comment added by 3085: 2884:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 1809:Trappist the monk 1591:Trappist the monk 1433:was dropped from 642:If it was from a 385: 384: 348: 347: 215: 214: 16:(Redirected from 3748: 3713: 3462: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3443: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3285: 3243: 3239: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3220: 3216: 3213: 3167: 3084: 3058: 3011: 2876: 2806: 2781: 2735: 2685: 2679: 2646: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2626: 2621: 2615: 2523: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2503: 2499: 2493: 2489: 2483: 2479: 2473: 2469: 2463: 2459: 2451: 2445: 2441: 2435: 2346:don't personally 2328: 2248: 2106:Vincenty, T. (-) 2090: 2070: 2054: 2052: 2051: 2018: 1946: 1803: 1785: 1726: 1585: 1581: 1580:|article-number= 1577: 1573: 1565: 1564:|article-number= 1561: 1453: 1447: 1442: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1422: 1417: 1411: 1407: 1401: 1374: 1350: 1304: 1260: 1060: 968: 911: 904: 834: 828: 824: 818: 806: 797: 788: 778: 751: 742: 740: 728: 722: 718: 712: 704: 698: 694: 690: 689:|journal=medRxiv 681: 655: 651: 645: 639: 637: 624: 618: 614: 610: 604: 595: 566: 560: 554: 550: 546: 545:|journal=bioRxiv 542: 536: 532: 526: 486: 480: 476: 470: 459: 443:Feature requests 414: 410: 391:and assistants ( 380: 364: 86: 78:List of archives 74: 57: 49: 45: 21: 3756: 3755: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3741: 3697: 3689: 3635: 3627: 3590: 3570: 3516: 3479: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3399: 3380: 3338: 3314: 3269: 3261: 3179: 3146: 3112: 3068: 3037: 3034: 2990: 2977: 2940: 2855: 2785: 2778: 2766: 2717: 2683: 2677: 2644: 2638: 2630: 2624: 2619: 2617:Cite conference 2613: 2603: 2531: 2521: 2515: 2507: 2501: 2497: 2491: 2487: 2481: 2477: 2471: 2467: 2461: 2453: 2449: 2443: 2439: 2433: 2426: 2375: 2307: 2246: 2195:Physical Review 2143:Remember, from 2068: 2060: 2049: 2047: 2016: 2008: 1925: 1907: 1858: 1705: 1698: 1643: 1567: 1555: 1548: 1490: 1451: 1445: 1440: 1434: 1426: 1420: 1415: 1409: 1405: 1399: 1353: 1314: 1283: 1239: 1187: 1039: 995:Charles Clinton 991: 966: 907: 843: 832: 826: 822: 816: 757: 749: 731: 726: 720: 716: 710: 702: 696: 660: 649: 643: 627: 622: 569: 564: 558: 552: 540: 534: 530: 524: 484: 478: 474: 468: 453: 445: 423: 412: 408: 376: 365: 359: 349: 216: 91: 79: 62: 47: 39: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3754: 3752: 3743: 3740: 3739: 3736: 3733: 3730: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3718: 3708: 3705: 3702: 3698: 3696: 3693: 3691: 3688: 3687: 3684: 3681: 3676: 3673: 3670: 3667: 3664: 3660: 3659: 3646: 3643: 3640: 3636: 3634: 3631: 3629: 3626: 3625: 3622: 3614: 3613: 3609: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3597: 3591: 3589: 3586: 3575:AManWithNoPlan 3572: 3569: 3568: 3565: 3562: 3557: 3554: 3551: 3548: 3545: 3541: 3540: 3527: 3524: 3521: 3517: 3515: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3500:AManWithNoPlan 3481: 3478: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3466: 3463: 3447: 3444: 3428: 3424: 3423: 3410: 3407: 3404: 3400: 3398: 3395: 3382: 3379: 3378: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3365: 3364:Good question! 3362: 3358: 3357: 3349: 3346: 3343: 3339: 3337: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3322:AManWithNoPlan 3316: 3313: 3312: 3309: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3290: 3280: 3277: 3274: 3270: 3268: 3265: 3263: 3260: 3259: 3256: 3253: 3248: 3245: 3242:|author1-mask= 3230:|author1-link= 3208: 3204: 3203: 3190: 3187: 3184: 3180: 3178: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3140: 3139: 3127:David Eppstein 3114: 3111: 3110: 3107: 3104: 3101: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3089: 3079: 3076: 3073: 3069: 3067: 3064: 3036: 3033: 3032: 3029: 3026: 3021: 3017: 3016: 2988: 2985: 2982: 2978: 2976: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2939: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2888:David Eppstein 2849: 2838:APL Quote Quad 2816:David Eppstein 2783: 2782: 2776: 2737: 2736: 2726:(4): 184–189. 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2674: 2664:David Eppstein 2610:David Eppstein 2605: 2602: 2601: 2598: 2595: 2592: 2589: 2569:APL Quote Quad 2561: 2557: 2556: 2546:David Eppstein 2542: 2539: 2536: 2532: 2530: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2485:cite citeseerx 2428: 2425: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2405: 2401: 2400: 2390:David Eppstein 2386: 2383: 2380: 2376: 2374: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2300: 2281: 2274: 2268: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2148: 2141: 2138: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2119: 2116: 2113: 2110: 2107: 2104: 2091: 2081:(176): 88–93. 2058: 2055: 2012:(1975-04-01). 2006: 2003: 1989:David Eppstein 1980: 1963: 1906: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1889:RememberOrwell 1875:AManWithNoPlan 1857: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1805: 1769:David Eppstein 1765: 1761: 1750: 1737:AManWithNoPlan 1700: 1697: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1684: 1681: 1680: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1658:David Eppstein 1654: 1651: 1648: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1623:AManWithNoPlan 1609:AManWithNoPlan 1602: 1601: 1587: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1489: 1486: 1475:David Eppstein 1467: 1466: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1383:David Eppstein 1334:David Eppstein 1313: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1268:David Eppstein 1225:David Eppstein 1221: 1220: 1216: 1213: 1202: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1159:RememberOrwell 1120:David Eppstein 1100:David Eppstein 1086:David Eppstein 1036: 990: 987: 986: 985: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 842: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 813: 807: 776:10.1101/007237 755: 752: 747: 744: 738:10.1101/007237 707: 706: 705: 687:Same for with 685: 657: 640: 635:10.1101/062109 625: 620: 605: 584:10.1101/062109 567: 521: 515: 512: 505: 499: 493: 487: 465: 460: 444: 441: 440: 421: 413:DUPLICATE_xxx= 409:DUPLICATE_xxx= 383: 382: 370: 367: 366: 361: 357: 355: 352: 351: 350: 346: 345: 344: 343: 337: 331: 325: 319: 313: 307: 301: 295: 289: 283: 277: 271: 265: 259: 253: 247: 241: 235: 229: 223: 213: 212: 211: 210: 204: 198: 192: 186: 180: 174: 168: 162: 156: 150: 144: 138: 132: 126: 120: 114: 108: 102: 93: 92: 89: 84: 81: 80: 77: 72: 71: 68: 67: 64: 63: 58: 52: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3753: 3744: 3737: 3734: 3731: 3728: 3726: 3724: 3721: 3720: 3717: 3712: 3709: 3706: 3703: 3700: 3699: 3694: 3692: 3685: 3682: 3680: 3677: 3674: 3671: 3668: 3665: 3662: 3661: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3647: 3644: 3641: 3638: 3637: 3632: 3630: 3623: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3612: 3610: 3607: 3605: 3603: 3600: 3599: 3596: 3593: 3592: 3585: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3566: 3563: 3561: 3558: 3555: 3552: 3549: 3546: 3543: 3542: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3530:Demetrios1993 3528: 3525: 3522: 3519: 3518: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3475: 3472: 3470: 3467: 3464: 3448: 3445: 3429: 3426: 3425: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3411: 3408: 3405: 3402: 3401: 3396: 3394: 3393: 3390: 3385: 3384:This citation 3376: 3373: 3371: 3369: 3366: 3363: 3360: 3359: 3356: 3353: 3350: 3347: 3344: 3341: 3340: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3310: 3307: 3303: 3300: 3298: 3296: 3293: 3292: 3289: 3284: 3281: 3278: 3275: 3272: 3271: 3266: 3264: 3257: 3254: 3252: 3249: 3246: 3238:|author-mask= 3235: 3226:|author-link= 3209: 3206: 3205: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3191: 3188: 3185: 3182: 3181: 3176: 3170: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3108: 3105: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3095: 3092: 3091: 3088: 3083: 3080: 3077: 3074: 3071: 3070: 3063: 3062: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3030: 3027: 3025: 3022: 3019: 3018: 3015: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2979: 2974:Pages --: --> 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2937: 2929: 2926: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2853: 2850: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2779: 2774: 2770: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2742: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2695: 2692: 2689: 2682: 2675: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2643: 2629: 2618: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2582: 2581:User:Headbomb 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2559: 2558: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2528: 2520: 2506: 2496: 2486: 2476: 2466: 2457: 2448: 2438: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2422: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2402: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2377: 2372: 2358: 2355: 2352: 2347: 2345: 2340: 2336: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2305: 2301: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2272: 2269: 2266: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2244: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2234: 2231: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2191: 2187: 2184: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2149: 2146: 2142: 2139: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2101: 2099: 2098: 2097:Survey Review 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2074:Survey Review 2067: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2021:Survey Review 2015: 2011: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1969: 1964: 1962: 1959: 1956: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1916: 1913: 1904: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1855: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1703: 1694: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1645: 1640: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1571: 1559: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1544: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1533: 1530: 1527: 1524: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1493: 1492: 1487: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1450: 1439: 1425: 1414: 1404: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1318: 1311: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1184: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1037: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 984: 980: 976: 972: 963: 953: 949: 945: 941: 940: 939: 935: 931: 926: 925: 924: 920: 916: 910: 900: 899: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 881: 880: 877: 874: 869: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 854: 849: 831: 821: 814: 812: 808: 804: 801: 796: 792: 787: 782: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 756: 754:and expand it 753: 748: 745: 739: 735: 730: 729: 725: 715: 708: 701: 686: 684: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 658: 648: 641: 636: 632: 626: 621: 606: 602: 599: 594: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 568: 563: 562: 557: 539: 529: 522: 520: 516: 513: 510: 506: 504: 500: 497: 494: 492: 488: 483: 473: 466: 464: 457: 451: 447: 446: 442: 439: 437: 432: 430: 429: 420: 418: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 379: 374: 369: 368: 354: 353: 341: 338: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 317: 314: 311: 308: 305: 302: 299: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 236: 233: 230: 227: 224: 221: 218: 217: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 127: 124: 121: 118: 115: 112: 109: 106: 103: 100: 97: 96: 95: 94: 88: 87: 83: 82: 76: 75: 70: 69: 66: 65: 61: 56: 51: 50: 43: 37: 33: 29: 19: 3742: 3722:What happens 3710: 3690: 3663:What happens 3628: 3615: 3601:What happens 3571: 3544:What happens 3480: 3427:What happens 3381: 3315: 3294:What happens 3282: 3262: 3228:rather than 3207:What happens 3121:— Preceding 3113: 3093:What happens 3081: 3035: 2941: 2837: 2784: 2768: 2759: 2755: 2738: 2723: 2719: 2700: 2628:cite journal 2604: 2585: 2568: 2560:What happens 2495:cite medrxiv 2475:cite biorxiv 2427: 2404:What happens 2343: 2303: 2302:Again, that 2242: 2194: 2095: 2078: 2072: 2048:. Retrieved 2024: 2020: 1908: 1859: 1756: 1752: 1699: 1676: 1672:What happens 1574:when it has 1558:cite journal 1549: 1522:What happens 1468: 1431:|periodical= 1403:cite journal 1327: 1324: 1321: 1315: 1222: 1209: 1205: 1188: 1157:'s request. 1067: 992: 844: 830:cite journal 820:cite medRxiv 767: 763: 724:cite journal 714:cite bioRxiv 700:cite medrxiv 575: 556:cite bioRxiv 528:cite journal 433: 426: 424: 416: 407:Addition of 404: 386: 372: 59: 27: 3707:Reported by 3645:Reported by 3526:Reported by 3409:Reported by 3348:Reported by 3279:Reported by 3189:Reported by 3078:Reported by 2987:Reported by 2541:Reported by 2458:|mode=cs2}} 2385:Reported by 2247:3l33t h4x0r 2109:No abstract 1653:Reported by 1500:Reported by 378:ClueBot III 90:Before 2020 34:. See also 3649:GoingBatty 3234:Module:CS1 2902:XOR'easter 2777:0897913272 2744:0897913272 2465:cite arxiv 2251:XOR'easter 2199:XOR'easter 2050:2008-07-21 1984:MathSciNet 1504:Suntooooth 1195:WP:CITEVAR 1105:Shearonink 1072:Shearonink 1026:Shearonink 1011:Shearonink 975:R. S. Shaw 965:to be the 770:: e05856. 611:, convert 593:1866/23301 578:: 062109. 428:click here 389:maintainer 373:90000 days 340:Archive 39 334:Archive 38 328:Archive 37 322:Archive 36 316:Archive 35 310:Archive 34 304:Archive 33 298:Archive 32 292:Archive 31 286:Archive 30 280:Archive 29 274:Archive 28 268:Archive 27 262:Archive 26 256:Archive 25 250:Archive 24 244:Archive 23 238:Archive 22 232:Archive 21 226:Archive 20 220:Archive 19 207:Archive 18 201:Archive 17 195:Archive 16 189:Archive 15 183:Archive 14 177:Archive 13 171:Archive 12 165:Archive 11 159:Archive 10 3193:Folly Mox 2960:Folly Mox 2922:jacobolus 2836:) and in 2762:.75170): 2688:jacobolus 2649:Folly Mox 2642:cite book 2633:supports 2512:|mode=cs2 2510:all have 2505:cite ssrn 2409:this edit 2351:jacobolus 2230:jacobolus 2180:jacobolus 2166:Folly Mox 2153:jacobolus 2031:: 88–93. 1968:jacobolus 1955:jacobolus 1912:jacobolus 1862:jacobolus 1832:Folly Mox 1788:Folly Mox 1689:Not that. 1584:|page(s)= 1576:|journal= 1566:(as does 1562:supports 1506:, it/he ( 1456:Folly Mox 1449:cite book 1438:cite book 1424:cite book 1413:cite book 1325:Stop it. 1005:and once 944:Folly Mox 915:Folly Mox 909:jacobolus 885:this edit 873:jacobolus 848:Cite book 815:Same for 654:|mode=cs2 652:, append 617:|biorxiv= 461:Example: 456:Who's Who 153:Archive 9 147:Archive 8 141:Archive 7 135:Archive 6 129:Archive 5 123:Archive 4 117:Archive 3 111:Archive 2 105:Archive 1 99:Archive 0 30:See also 3553:Not that 3219:|first1= 3148:Headbomb 3135:contribs 3123:unsigned 3039:Headbomb 2992:Headbomb 2938:GOOD BOT 2857:Headbomb 2787:Headbomb 2681:citation 2594:Not that 2519:citation 2456:cite xxx 2447:citation 2437:cite xxx 2309:Headbomb 2064:(1975). 1927:Headbomb 1707:Headbomb 1570:citation 1512:contribs 1355:Headbomb 1285:Headbomb 1241:Headbomb 1151:Headbomb 1134:Headbomb 1098:Oh good 1041:Headbomb 803:26080931 662:Headbomb 647:citation 601:64293941 538:citation 60:Archives 42:cite xxx 36:Help:CS1 3704:new bug 3642:new bug 3523:new bug 3406:new bug 3345:new bug 3276:new bug 3222:|last1= 3212:|first= 3075:new bug 2984:new bug 2538:new bug 2382:new bug 2293:Bibcode 2285:Bibcode 2249:feel.) 2033:Bibcode 1979:hidden. 1650:new bug 1497:new bug 795:4468965 772:bioRxiv 734:bioRxiv 631:bioRxiv 576:bioRxiv 561:, i.e. 425:Please 397:Thing 2 393:Thing 1 3711::Jay8g 3701:Status 3639:Status 3520:Status 3403:Status 3342:Status 3283::Jay8g 3273:Status 3215:|last= 3183:Status 3082::Jay8g 3072:Status 2981:Status 2945:jengod 2635:|isbn= 2535:Status 2500:, and 2379:Status 2145:WP:NOT 1647:Status 1494:Status 1219:fixed? 656:to it. 472:BioRef 38:, and 3305:case. 2278:PMIDs 2225:lists 2221:lists 2217:lists 2213:lists 2069:(PDF) 2017:(PDF) 1208:, or 1155:Jay8g 764:eLife 613:|doi= 598:S2CID 543:with 28:Note: 3653:talk 3579:talk 3560:Diff 3534:talk 3504:talk 3489:talk 3460:ndhF 3441:NDHF 3417:talk 3397:caps 3326:talk 3197:talk 3131:talk 2964:talk 2949:talk 2906:talk 2892:talk 2820:talk 2773:ISBN 2741:ISBN 2668:talk 2653:talk 2550:talk 2452:(or 2394:talk 2255:talk 2203:talk 2170:talk 1993:talk 1893:talk 1879:talk 1836:talk 1813:talk 1792:talk 1773:talk 1741:talk 1662:talk 1627:talk 1613:talk 1595:talk 1508:talk 1479:talk 1460:talk 1387:talk 1338:talk 1272:talk 1229:talk 1163:talk 1141:talk 1124:talk 1109:talk 1090:talk 1076:talk 1068:with 1030:talk 1015:talk 1007:here 1003:here 979:talk 948:talk 934:talk 930:Οἶδα 919:talk 893:talk 889:Οἶδα 861:talk 857:Οἶδα 800:PMID 489:Use 482:GBIF 477:and 401:code 395:and 3456:and 3452:str 3437:And 3433:STR 3240:or 3217:to 2925:(t) 2842:doi 2830:doi 2748:doi 2728:doi 2707:doi 2691:(t) 2647:s. 2563:In 2407:In 2354:(t) 2344:you 2304:you 2243:are 2233:(t) 2183:(t) 2156:(t) 2131:doi 2083:doi 2041:doi 1971:(t) 1958:(t) 1915:(t) 1865:(t) 1473:. — 1408:to 999:URL 993:On 876:(t) 825:to 791:PMC 781:doi 691:or 615:to 588:hdl 580:doi 547:or 533:or 452:to 417:503 3655:) 3581:) 3536:) 3506:) 3491:) 3454:. 3435:. 3419:) 3389:Ed 3352:Ed 3328:) 3199:) 3162:· 3158:· 3154:· 3137:) 3133:• 3053:· 3049:· 3045:· 3006:· 3002:· 2998:· 2966:) 2951:) 2908:) 2894:) 2871:· 2867:· 2863:· 2822:) 2801:· 2797:· 2793:· 2724:19 2722:. 2713:: 2684:}} 2678:{{ 2670:) 2655:) 2645:}} 2639:{{ 2631:}} 2625:{{ 2620:}} 2614:{{ 2612:, 2552:) 2522:}} 2516:{{ 2508:}} 2502:{{ 2498:}} 2492:{{ 2490:, 2488:}} 2482:{{ 2480:, 2478:}} 2472:{{ 2470:, 2468:}} 2462:{{ 2454:{{ 2450:}} 2444:{{ 2440:}} 2434:{{ 2396:) 2323:· 2319:· 2315:· 2273:.) 2257:) 2205:) 2172:) 2079:23 2077:. 2071:. 2039:. 2025:23 2023:. 2019:. 1995:) 1941:· 1937:· 1933:· 1895:) 1881:) 1838:) 1815:) 1794:) 1775:) 1743:) 1721:· 1717:· 1713:· 1664:) 1629:) 1615:) 1597:) 1572:}} 1568:{{ 1560:}} 1556:{{ 1514:) 1481:) 1462:) 1452:}} 1446:{{ 1441:}} 1435:{{ 1427:}} 1421:{{ 1416:}} 1410:{{ 1406:}} 1400:{{ 1389:) 1369:· 1365:· 1361:· 1340:) 1299:· 1295:· 1291:· 1274:) 1255:· 1251:· 1247:· 1231:) 1165:) 1143:) 1126:) 1111:) 1092:) 1078:) 1055:· 1051:· 1047:· 1032:) 1017:) 981:) 973:- 950:) 936:) 921:) 895:) 863:) 855:. 833:}} 827:{{ 823:}} 817:{{ 798:. 789:. 779:. 766:. 762:. 727:}} 721:{{ 717:}} 711:{{ 703:}} 697:{{ 676:· 672:· 668:· 650:}} 644:{{ 596:. 586:. 574:. 559:}} 553:{{ 541:}} 535:{{ 531:}} 525:{{ 485:}} 479:{{ 475:}} 469:{{ 458:}} 454:{{ 44:}} 40:{{ 3651:( 3577:( 3532:( 3502:( 3487:( 3415:( 3324:( 3195:( 3166:} 3164:b 3160:p 3156:c 3152:t 3150:{ 3129:( 3057:} 3055:b 3051:p 3047:c 3043:t 3041:{ 3010:} 3008:b 3004:p 3000:c 2996:t 2994:{ 2962:( 2947:( 2904:( 2890:( 2875:} 2873:b 2869:p 2865:c 2861:t 2859:{ 2844:: 2840:( 2832:: 2818:( 2805:} 2803:b 2799:p 2795:c 2791:t 2789:{ 2780:. 2760:5 2756:4 2750:: 2746:/ 2734:. 2730:: 2709:: 2666:( 2651:( 2548:( 2544:— 2524:. 2392:( 2388:— 2327:} 2325:b 2321:p 2317:c 2313:t 2311:{ 2295:: 2287:: 2280:. 2253:( 2201:( 2168:( 2137:. 2133:: 2089:. 2085:: 2053:. 2043:: 2035:: 1991:( 1987:— 1966:– 1945:} 1943:b 1939:p 1935:c 1931:t 1929:{ 1891:( 1877:( 1834:( 1811:( 1807:— 1790:( 1771:( 1739:( 1725:} 1723:b 1719:p 1715:c 1711:t 1709:{ 1660:( 1656:— 1625:( 1611:( 1593:( 1589:— 1586:. 1510:/ 1477:( 1458:( 1385:( 1373:} 1371:b 1367:p 1363:c 1359:t 1357:{ 1336:( 1303:} 1301:b 1297:p 1293:c 1289:t 1287:{ 1270:( 1259:} 1257:b 1253:p 1249:c 1245:t 1243:{ 1227:( 1223:— 1161:( 1149:@ 1139:( 1132:@ 1122:( 1118:— 1107:( 1088:( 1074:( 1059:} 1057:b 1053:p 1049:c 1045:t 1043:{ 1028:( 1013:( 977:( 946:( 932:( 917:( 891:( 859:( 805:. 783:: 768:4 741:. 680:} 678:b 674:p 670:c 666:t 664:{ 638:. 603:. 590:: 582:: 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index