310:
56:
119:
890:). Avoid mixed bag section titles like "Controversies" without it being clear in the section title (or in the titles of the subsections of such section) what these controversies are about. If the content of such a section is of the "mixed bag" kind, the section should be handled as a trivia section (see
772:
guidelines; that is, the criticism itself should be the subject of independent, reliable sources. Such articles should not be a repository of all things critical, but a review of significant sources of criticism. This style of article is generally discouraged, but it is sometimes used for political,
379:
For example, if a politician received significant criticism about their public image, create a section entitled "Public image" or "Public profile", and include all related information—positive and negative—within that section. If a book was heavily criticized, create a section in the book's article
867:
An acceptable approach to including criticisms in
Knowledge (XXG) articles is to separate the description of a topic from a description of how the topic was received. Suitable section titles, depending on case, include: "Reception", "Response", "Reviews" and "Reactions". These sections include both
601:
With this approach, the article contains a section dedicated to positive and negative assessments of the topic. The section should not use a negative title like "Criticism" or "Controversies" but instead should use a more neutral term such as "Reception", "Assessment", "Reviews", "Influence", or
914:
weighed in on the question: "In many cases are necessary, and in many cases they are not necessary. And I agree with the view expressed by others that often, they are a symptom of bad writing. That is, it isn't that we should not include the criticisms, but that the information should be properly
905:
A section dedicated to negative material is sometimes appropriate, if the sources treat the negative material as an organic whole, and if readers would be better served by seeing all the negative material in one location. However, sections dedicated to negative material may violate the NPOV policy
152:
In most cases separate sections devoted to criticism, controversies, or the like should be avoided in an article because these sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints. Articles should present the prevailing viewpoints from reliable sources, whether positive or negative. Segregation of
960:
A dedicated "Reception history" or "History of criticism" article may be acceptable for certain literary, historical, or artistic topics, if the sources justify it. Such articles should describe the historical progression of the criticism, as well as documenting both the positive and negative
858:
Often the best approach to incorporating negative criticism into the encyclopedia is to integrate it into the article, in a way that does not disrupt the article's flow. The article should be divided into sections based on topics, timeline, or theme – not viewpoint. Negative criticism should be
383:
Articles on artists and works by artists often include material describing the opinions of critics, peers, and reviewers. Although the term "criticism" can, in that context, include both positive and negative assessment, the word "Criticism" or "Accolades" should be avoided in section titles
153:
text or other content into different subsections, based solely on the apparent POV of the content itself, may result in an unencyclopedic structure, such as a back-and-forth dialogue between proponents and opponents. There is no requirement to include criticism or controversies in an article.
395:
Criticisms and controversies are two distinct concepts, and they should not be commingled. Criticisms are specific appraisals or assessments, whereas controversies are protracted public disputes, with opposing opinions rather than universal disapproval. Thus, sections such as "Criticisms and
951:
Similarly, sections dedicated to positive material may violate the NPOV policy by causing a distortion, albeit in the opposite direction and maybe a promotional editing and public relations editing magnet especially in articles on people, products, businesses and organizations.
145:(NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. If significant views include negative criticism of the article subject published in
942:
Sometimes a section is created to describe a significant criticism made by a notable critic. In these situations, the section title should be something like "View of Maria Smith" or "Reaction of the NY Times", and should avoid the word "criticism" in the section title.
286:: even if third-party reliable sources are generally negative about a topic this shouldn't impede devoting sufficient space to a fair description of the topic, for instance (partially) based on primary or self-published sources, within the limits of policy.
918:
Many criticism sections found in articles are present because editors collected negative material, but have not had the time to properly integrate the negative material into the other sections of the article. Such negative sections should be tagged with a
631:
as supported by the sources. The topic of the controversy is best named in the section title (when there are distinct groups of controversies, the section title can be "Controversies", with subsection titles indicating what these are about).
387:
In some situations the term "criticism" may be appropriate in an article or section title, for example, if there is a large body of critical material, and if independent secondary sources comment, analyze or discuss the critical material.
859:
interwoven throughout the topical or thematic sections. However, for example, when the structure of an article is timeline-based "criticism" can't precede the genesis history of the subject (except possibly for a mentioning in the lede).
1076:
391:
Sections or article titles should generally not include the word "controversies". Instead, titles should simply name the event, for example, "2009 boycott" or "Hunting incident". The word "controversy" should not appear in the title.
659:
In this approach, the article contains a section which focuses only on negative criticisms. This approach is sometimes used for politics, religion and philosophy topics. Great care should be taken that the section is not an
567:
Often it is best to integrate the negative criticism into the article: negative information is woven throughout the article in the appropriate topical sections. The article does not have a dedicated "Criticism" section.
376:
Other than for articles about particular worldviews, philosophies or religious topics etc. where different considerations apply (see below), best practice is to incorporate positive and negative material into the same
537:. Integrating criticism into the main article can cause confusion because readers may misconstrue the critical material as representative of the philosophy's outlook, the political stance, or the religion's tenets.
744:
Use the term "controversy" in an article title only when this is part of the common name of the topic of that article, and the controversy is notable in its own right (as opposed to being part of a larger topic)
384:
because it may convey a biased connotation to many readers. Alternative section titles which avoid a negative connotation include "Reception", "Reviews", "Responses", "Reactions", "Critiques", and "Assessments".
985:
Articles dedicated to controversies about a topic are generally discouraged, for many of the same reasons discussed for criticism-related material. Articles dedicated to a controversy may be appropriate if the
202:
The prominence and proportion of coverage on negative or positive materials should reflect those of what is published in reliable sources. Prominence among
Knowledge (XXG) editors or the general public are
707:
This approach employs a separate article that includes both positive and negative viewpoints. This approach is often taken when the primary article on a literary topic grows too large and is subject to a
882:
For a specific controversy regarding the topic, when such topic takes a prominent place in the reliable sources on the topic. "Controversy" is not necessarily part of the name of such a section (e.g.
1018:
states that "Knowledge (XXG) articles should not be split into multiple articles solely so each can advocate a different stance on the subject." For example, the "Criticism" section of
995:
752:
486:
374:. Sections within an article dedicated to negative criticisms are normally also discouraged. Topical or thematic sections are frequently superior to sections devoted to criticism.
1014:
Creating separate articles with the sole purpose of grouping the criticisms or to elaborate individual points of criticism on a certain topic is generally considered a POV fork.
868:
negative and positive assessments. This approach usually conforms to the WP neutrality policy, because it avoids being "all negative" or "exclusively laudatory" about the topic.
844:
731:
228:
Integrate negative material into sections that cover all viewpoints of the event, product, or policy that is being criticized, rather than in a dedicated "criticism" section.
243:
Negative material about living persons may violate privacy policies or damage the person's reputation; therefore, strict rules are in place to govern such information. See
1068:
727:
1174:
891:
1063:
428:). Generally, new subarticles should not be devoted to criticism, controversies, or other specific viewpoints but should instead focus on topical themes.
404:
The best approach to including negative criticism is to integrate it into the primary article on the topic. Sometimes that will cause the article to get
244:
238:
157:
359:
An article dedicated to negative criticism of a topic, as well as one dedicated to accolades and praises is usually discouraged because it tends to be
259:
should be given to criticism. Some policies and guidelines that help determine the amount and presentation (or: weight) of criticism in an article:
1179:
1030:
are sometimes appropriate for organizations, businesses, philosophies, religions, or political outlooks, provided the sources justify it; see the
588:
999:
266:: the weight a Knowledge (XXG) article gives to criticism of its subject should be proportionate to the overall weight of such criticisms in
71:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
72:
1058:
824:
1093:
371:
466:
to the controversies or criticisms, then sections and subarticles about them may be justified, but only within the limitations of
1124:
1103:
454:
Many organizations and corporations are involved in well-documented controversies or may be subject to significant criticism. If
910:
dominating the article but may simplify maintenance of the article if unhelpful edits are limited to a single section. In 2006,
828:
1053:
804:
1081:
1048:
627:
For a specific controversy that is broadly covered in reliable sources. Various positions, whether pro or contra, are given
800:
719:
614:
1015:
990:
on the topic discuss the controversies as an independent topic. Examples of articles devoted to a controversy include
812:
297:
The list of suggestions above is not comprehensive, it shows a few directions where additional guidance may be found.
661:
318:
991:
933:
756:
962:
409:
1003:
723:
709:
481:
is very long and it was deemed unpractical to integrate all the controversy material into the main article: the
413:
405:
222:
31:
877:
965:
type of section summarizing the "reception history", and properly linking to the subsidiary article (for the
276:: don't split off articles with the purpose of purging a Knowledge (XXG) article of its legitimate criticism.
832:
792:
506:
534:
417:
35:
887:
840:
836:
715:
610:
467:
279:
76:
42:
796:
788:
773:
religious, and philosophical topics that draw significant opposition. In all cases, the article must be
748:
635:
907:
437:
360:
335:
86:
30:
This page is about material that emphasizes negative criticism. For criticism of
Knowledge (XXG), see
1023:
923:
915:
incorporated throughout the article rather than having a troll magnet section of random criticisms."
820:
808:
490:
478:
474:
778:
425:
324:
283:
273:
263:
146:
132:
1098:
1027:
290:
64:
687:
675:
606:
173:
Most problems with negative material can be avoided by adhering to standard WP policies, such as
256:
215:
196:
178:
149:, then they should be incorporated into the article content in an appropriate and neutral way.
128:
1129:
774:
207:
182:
142:
966:
911:
628:
364:
1158:
987:
482:
455:
267:
211:
190:
160:
requires exercising special care in presenting negative viewpoints about living persons.
327:
in editing this section, but that it would be a good idea to check the discussion first.
1143:
671:
533:) – it will usually be appropriate to have a "Criticism" section or "Criticism of ..."
510:
769:
602:"Response". This approach is often found in articles on books or other works of art.
174:
1168:
421:
17:
185:. When including negative material in an article, some things to check for include:
79:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
584:
526:
1077:
Knowledge (XXG):Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
380:
called "Reception", and include positive and negative material in that section.
883:
695:
679:
683:
667:
640:
514:
127:
Articles should include significant criticisms of the subject while avoiding
939:
to notify other editors that more work is needed to integrate the material.
477:
often describe its controversies in detail, as an independent topic. As the
691:
572:
502:
1019:
974:
970:
576:
530:
518:
206:
Always present positive viewpoints along with any negative information
545:
Approaches to incorporating controversy and criticism are as follows:
225:, so that the criticism is not presented in the encyclopedia's voice.
41:
For the policy on naming "Criticisms of X" articles or sections, see
897:
As of
October 2022 about 33,000 articles have controversy sections.
501:
For topics about a particular point of view – such as philosophies (
301:
Avoid sections and articles focusing on criticisms or controversies
522:
323:
Please feel free to join in. This doesn't mean that you may not
223:
name the source of the criticism within the paragraph or sentence
580:
906:
and may be a troll magnet, which can be harmful if it leads to
304:
113:
50:
1161:– Google search for "Criticism of ..." within Knowledge (XXG)
251:
Amount and presentation of criticism: other related guidance
27:
Essay/guideline on criticism sections and criticism articles
649:(with subsection titles "General media" and "Award shows")
141:
All encyclopedic content on
Knowledge (XXG) must adhere to
1094:
Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view § Article structure
487:
Concerns and controversies over the 2008 Summer
Olympics
645:
445:
350:
343:
221:
When presenting negative material, it is often best to
101:
94:
1031:
493:
of the controversies is retained in the main article.
293:
may instruct how to handle criticism in certain areas.
845:
Criticism of government response to
Hurricane Katrina
1022:
should not be moved to a separate article such as "
732:
Responses to the 2006 Duke
University lacrosse case
547:
424:to link to the new subarticles (related guidance:
408:, in which case the article should be split using
1032:"Philosophy, religion, or politics" section above
1072:(the phrase doesn't mean what you think it does)
888:Rick Ross (consultant)#Jason Scott deprogramming
412:. The preferred way to split an article is as a
892:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Trivia sections
1064:Knowledge (XXG):Copyediting reception sections
768:An article dedicated to criticism should pass
728:Influence and reception of Friedrich Nietzsche
636:Michael Collins Piper#Antisemitism controversy
199:beyond the emphasis given in reliable sources.
1069:Knowledge (XXG):Don't "teach the controversy"
961:criticisms. The "main" article should have a
239:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
8:
1159:intitle:"criticism of" site:en.wikipedia.org
396:controversies" are generally inappropriate.
981:Separate articles devoted to controversies
641:Mel Gibson#Alcohol abuse and legal issues
372:article structure must protect neutrality
189:Ensure that the material is supported by
73:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
1175:Knowledge (XXG) essays about neutrality
1115:
971:"Studies and reception history" section
363:, which is generally prohibited by the
158:policy on biographies of living persons
1059:Knowledge (XXG):Controversial articles
1010:Separate articles devoted to criticism
1000:Chiropractic controversy and criticism
473:Example: the sources that discuss the
1028:Dedicated "Criticism of ..." articles
7:
541:Approaches to presenting criticism
1180:Knowledge (XXG) essays about style
1054:Knowledge (XXG):Be neutral in form
825:Criticism of Amnesty International
77:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
1082:Knowledge (XXG):Pro and con lists
1049:Knowledge (XXG):Avoid thread mode
854:Integrated throughout the article
497:Philosophy, religion, or politics
460:other than the critics themselves
195:Do not present the material in a
1104:Special:PrefixIndex/Criticism of
485:was used to create a subarticle
308:
117:
54:
48:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
1016:Knowledge (XXG):Content forking
829:Criticism of the United Nations
462:– provide substantial coverage
317:This section is the subject of
179:balancing the content carefully
1130:Tweet by "depths of wikipedia"
805:Criticism of the War on Terror
432:Organizations and corporations
400:When an article gets too large
270:on the subject of the article.
1:
801:Criticism of multiculturalism
720:Reception of J. R. R. Tolkien
611:In Search of Lost Time (book)
245:Biographies of living persons
785:Philosophy/Politics/Religion
365:neutral point-of-view policy
169:Neutrality and verifiability
32:Criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
996:2008 Olympics controversies
813:Criticism of Libertarianism
753:2008 Olympics controversies
410:the WP splitting guidelines
1196:
992:Global warming controversy
956:Reception history articles
908:users with strong opinions
875:
764:"Criticism of ..." article
757:Global warming controversy
435:
333:
236:
183:writing in an unbiased way
84:
40:
36:Knowledge (XXG):Criticisms
29:
1004:Scientology controversies
556:
553:
550:
289:Specific guidelines like
863:"Reception" type section
724:Shakespeare's reputation
646:Kanye West#Controversies
125:This page in a nutshell:
833:Criticism of Greenpeace
793:Criticism of capitalism
513:), political outlooks (
483:summary style guideline
841:Criticism of Microsoft
837:Criticism of Coca-Cola
716:Reception of WikiLeaks
872:"Controversy" section
797:Criticism of religion
789:Criticisms of Marxism
749:Gamergate controversy
740:"Controversy" article
623:"Controversy" section
143:neutral point of view
75:, as it has not been
18:Knowledge (XXG):CRITS
1024:Criticism of Al Gore
969:example this is the
821:Criticism of the BBC
809:Criticism of atheism
664:list of complaints.
475:2008 Summer Olympics
361:a point-of-view fork
319:a current discussion
1099:Category:Criticisms
947:"Accolades" section
901:"Criticism" section
703:"Reception" article
655:"Criticism" section
597:"Reception" section
197:way that emphasizes
1088:Policy and content
884:Antibiotics#Misuse
777:and must not be a
676:Planned Parenthood
607:Catcher in the Rye
491:a summary overview
175:using good sources
156:Knowledge (XXG)'s
1073:
934:criticism-section
851:
850:
775:written neutrally
662:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
332:
331:
218:to one viewpoint.
210:in proportion to
139:
138:
112:
111:
16:(Redirected from
1187:
1146:
1141:
1135:
1132:5/6 October 2022
1120:
1071:
988:reliable sources
967:Tacitean studies
938:
932:
928:
922:
648:
548:
521:), or religion (
456:reliable sources
448:
353:
346:
312:
311:
305:
268:reliable sources
212:reliable sources
191:reliable sources
164:Adhere to policy
147:reliable sources
121:
120:
114:
104:
97:
58:
57:
51:
21:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1165:
1164:
1155:
1150:
1149:
1142:
1138:
1121:
1117:
1112:
1090:
1045:
1040:
1012:
983:
958:
949:
936:
930:
926:
920:
903:
880:
874:
865:
856:
644:
543:
499:
452:
451:
444:
440:
434:
422:"main" template
402:
357:
356:
349:
342:
338:
328:
309:
303:
253:
241:
235:
214:without giving
208:to give balance
171:
166:
118:
108:
107:
100:
93:
89:
81:
80:
55:
49:
46:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1193:
1191:
1183:
1182:
1177:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1154:
1153:External links
1151:
1148:
1147:
1136:
1134:
1133:
1127:
1114:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1079:
1074:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1011:
1008:
982:
979:
957:
954:
948:
945:
902:
899:
878:WP:CONTROVERSY
873:
870:
864:
861:
855:
852:
849:
848:
782:
766:
760:
759:
746:
742:
736:
735:
713:
705:
699:
698:
672:Existentialism
665:
657:
651:
650:
639:
633:
625:
619:
618:
603:
599:
593:
592:
569:
565:
559:
558:
555:
552:
542:
539:
511:Existentialism
498:
495:
450:
449:
441:
436:
433:
430:
401:
398:
370:Likewise, the
355:
354:
347:
339:
334:
330:
329:
315:
313:
302:
299:
295:
294:
287:
277:
271:
252:
249:
234:
233:Living persons
231:
230:
229:
226:
219:
204:
200:
193:
170:
167:
165:
162:
137:
136:
122:
110:
109:
106:
105:
98:
90:
85:
82:
70:
69:
61:
59:
47:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1192:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1170:
1160:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1145:
1140:
1137:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1075:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1037:
1035:
1034:for details.
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1009:
1007:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
980:
978:
976:
972:
968:
964:
963:summary style
955:
953:
946:
944:
940:
935:
925:
916:
913:
909:
900:
898:
895:
893:
889:
885:
879:
871:
869:
862:
860:
853:
847:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
817:Organizations
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
783:
780:
776:
771:
767:
765:
762:
761:
758:
754:
750:
747:
743:
741:
738:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
714:
711:
706:
704:
701:
700:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
666:
663:
658:
656:
653:
652:
647:
642:
637:
634:
630:
626:
624:
621:
620:
617:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
598:
595:
594:
591:
590:
589:Bill O'Reilly
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
564:
561:
560:
549:
546:
540:
538:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
496:
494:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
447:
443:
442:
439:
431:
429:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
399:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
373:
368:
366:
362:
352:
348:
345:
341:
340:
337:
326:
322:
320:
314:
307:
306:
300:
298:
292:
288:
285:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
265:
262:
261:
260:
258:
250:
248:
247:for details.
246:
240:
232:
227:
224:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:
194:
192:
188:
187:
186:
184:
180:
176:
168:
163:
161:
159:
154:
150:
148:
144:
134:
130:
126:
123:
116:
115:
103:
99:
96:
92:
91:
88:
83:
78:
74:
68:
66:
60:
53:
52:
44:
37:
33:
19:
1139:
1118:
1013:
984:
959:
950:
941:
917:
904:
896:
881:
866:
857:
816:
815:
784:
763:
739:
710:content fork
702:
654:
622:
605:
596:
585:George Soros
571:
562:
554:Description
544:
527:Christianity
500:
479:main article
472:
468:WP:BLPGROUPS
463:
459:
453:
414:content fork
403:
394:
390:
386:
382:
375:
369:
358:
316:
296:
280:WP:ABOUTSELF
257:undue weight
254:
242:
216:undue weight
172:
155:
151:
140:
129:undue weight
124:
62:
43:WP:POVNAMING
1144:Jimbo Wales
924:POV-section
912:Jimbo Wales
696:Creationism
680:Materialism
615:2001 (film)
418:subarticles
351:WP:CSECTION
237:Main page:
203:irrelevant.
133:POV forking
63:This is an
1169:Categories
977:article).
876:See also:
770:notability
668:World bank
629:due weight
563:Integrated
535:subarticle
515:Capitalism
507:Naturalism
426:WP:SPINOFF
420:, using a
284:WP:PRIMARY
274:WP:POVFORK
264:WP:BALASPS
1110:Footnotes
557:Examples
551:Approach
406:too large
336:Shortcuts
291:WP:FRINGE
102:WP:NOCRIT
87:Shortcuts
1038:See also
779:POV fork
692:Eugenics
573:Abortion
503:Idealism
489:, while
438:Shortcut
377:section.
344:WP:CRITS
1125:dataset
1020:Al Gore
975:Tacitus
973:in the
577:Slavery
531:Atheism
519:Marxism
464:devoted
446:WP:CORG
325:be bold
95:WP:CRIT
1043:Essays
1002:, and
688:Oracle
181:, and
1026:".
684:Exxon
523:Islam
416:into
65:essay
726:,
613:,
609:,
581:PETA
282:and
131:and
34:and
929:or
894:).
823:,
787:–
722:,
674:,
587:,
470:.
255:No
1171::
1006:.
998:,
994:,
937:}}
931:{{
927:}}
921:{{
886:,
843:,
839:,
835:,
831:,
827:,
819:–
811:,
807:,
803:,
799:,
795:,
791:,
781:.
755:,
751:,
734:,
730:,
718:,
712:.
694:,
690:,
686:,
682:,
678:,
670:,
643:,
583:,
579:,
575:,
529:,
525:,
517:,
509:,
505:,
458:–
367:.
177:,
638:,
321:.
135:.
67:.
45:.
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.