391:"This highlights a perennial and worrying problem about Esperanza: that they constantly set themselves apart. They say they give Wikipedians hope – but who has any interaction with Esperanza who isn’t Esperanzan? Why is there even a special term for someone who's in Esperanza? This organization ought to be deleted because they’re targeting new and vulnerable users, who then see everything on Knowledge (XXG) through green-tinted lenses, and it is not good. It does lead to superiority complexes, regardless of what the front page says. Esperanzans, at least the active ones, see themselves as Esperanzans first and foremost. We have to delete Esperanza for their own good, to show them what Knowledge (XXG) is like outside the wall of their sub-culture" (from the
18:
59:
128:
176:
in order to pursue an interest. Whether any given cabal actually exists usually is impossible to determine conclusively. Often the existence of a cabal is posited by a group holding opposite views to those of the supposed cabal; they may look like a cabal to others.
296:
Joke cabals are generally tolerated until they affect the project, at which point the matter often is taken up at one of the administrative noticeboards. Knowledge (XXG) pages used by individuals who are solely here to socialize, not contribute, may be raised at
185:
In the early days of
Knowledge (XXG), annoyed by a huge amount of vandalism and other irresponsible editing, a number of persons, including "fathers-founders" themselves, considered the idea of "benign cabals".
275:– Knowledge (XXG) is often accused of operating hierarchical cabals which most editors would not know the existence of. To satirize the theory a number of editors formed joke cabals. Some examples are
243:
on the encyclopedia. While speculation exists about how much influence such groups have over the encyclopedia, social groups are a fact of life, and some users have been known to use off-wiki means (
380:
392:
416:
411:
78:
369:
261:. The main concern about Esperanza was that it was bureaucratic and elitist and this was a strong concern when the group was brought to
266:
223:– This type of cabal is restricted in its membership and secretive about its functions or existence. The aims of such groups may be
421:
77:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors and is made to be humorous. This page is not one of
190:
was a strong proponent of giving editors considered to be experts an extra power, which was one of his major disagreements with
315:
173:
320:
43:
32:
310:
211:
199:
36:
169:
284:
348:
330:
343:
280:
198:. In 2001, Jimbo himself mused on the idea of "cabal membership", which had eventually led to the concept of
335:
138:
82:
325:
95:
26:
236:
228:
370:
Jimmy Wales Thu Oct 18 19:22:46 UTC 2001 post on
Knowledge (XXG)-l: A proposal for the new software
70:
253:– This type of cabal went through discussion on Knowledge (XXG). In August 2005, a group called
67:
258:
240:
232:
165:
17:
298:
276:
262:
254:
224:
405:
85:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
287:. They can offer light relief to editors especially after periods of heavy editing.
187:
153:
195:
191:
247:, e-mail, external websites, etc.) to coordinate their actions on-wiki.
227:, promotion of its members to become Knowledge (XXG) functionaries, or
269:
is an example of a sanctioned cabal, dedicated to fight vandalism.
164:
is often used loosely to describe real or imagined collectives of
159:
33:
Knowledge (XXG):Words of wisdom – on
Knowledge (XXG) and the Cabal
244:
122:
53:
16:
257:
was formed with the idea of fellowship and strengthening
142:. Two or more people who disagree with you constitute a
194:, and he even attempted to implement "expertocracy" in
110:
103:
136:Two or more people who agree with you constitute a
168:who have chosen to group inside or outside of the
31:"WP:CABAL" redirects here. You may be looking for
265:. In December 2006, the group was disbanded. The
216:Cabals can be roughly divided into three types:
87:This essay isn't meant to be taken seriously.
8:
79:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
381:Signpost Introducing Esperanza 19/09/05
362:
417:Knowledge (XXG) essays about consensus
7:
83:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
316:Knowledge (XXG):There is no cabal
239:, possibly to impress a specific
321:Knowledge (XXG):There is a cabal
126:
57:
35:, where it used to redirect, or
412:Humorous Knowledge (XXG) essays
44:Knowledge (XXG):Mediation Cabal
311:Knowledge (XXG):List of cabals
212:Knowledge (XXG):List of cabals
49:Humorous Knowledge (XXG) essay
37:Knowledge (XXG):List of cabals
1:
42:For the Mediation Cabal, see
349:Knowledge (XXG):Rouge editor
331:Knowledge (XXG):Meatpuppetry
422:Knowledge (XXG) cabal humor
344:Knowledge (XXG):Rouge admin
438:
336:Knowledge (XXG):Canvassing
209:
93:
41:
30:
24:
225:disruption of the project
326:Knowledge (XXG):Tag team
134:This page in a nutshell:
39:, a joke list of cabals.
27:Knowledge (XXG):Tag team
267:Counter-Vandalism Unit
21:
340:Cabal-related humor:
281:The Rouge Admin Cabal
81:, as it has not been
20:
277:The Bathrobe Cabal
22:
285:The Penguin Cabal
174:project namespace
150:
149:
121:
120:
429:
396:
389:
383:
378:
372:
367:
130:
129:
123:
113:
106:
61:
60:
54:
437:
436:
432:
431:
430:
428:
427:
426:
402:
401:
400:
399:
390:
386:
379:
375:
368:
364:
359:
307:
294:
214:
208:
183:
154:Knowledge (XXG)
127:
117:
116:
109:
102:
98:
90:
89:
58:
50:
47:
40:
29:
23:
12:
11:
5:
435:
433:
425:
424:
419:
414:
404:
403:
398:
397:
384:
373:
361:
360:
358:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
346:
338:
333:
328:
323:
318:
313:
306:
303:
293:
290:
289:
288:
270:
248:
207:
204:
200:administrators
182:
179:
148:
147:
131:
119:
118:
115:
114:
107:
99:
94:
91:
76:
75:
64:
62:
48:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
434:
423:
420:
418:
415:
413:
410:
409:
407:
394:
393:Esperanza MfD
388:
385:
382:
377:
374:
371:
366:
363:
356:
350:
347:
345:
342:
341:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
322:
319:
317:
314:
312:
309:
308:
304:
302:
300:
291:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
246:
242:
241:point of view
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
218:
217:
213:
205:
203:
201:
197:
193:
189:
180:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
161:
155:
145:
141:
140:
135:
132:
125:
124:
112:
108:
105:
101:
100:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
74:
72:
69:
63:
56:
55:
52:
45:
38:
34:
28:
19:
387:
376:
365:
295:
272:
251:Editor cabal
250:
233:meatpuppetry
221:Secret cabal
220:
215:
188:Larry Sanger
184:
157:
151:
143:
137:
133:
86:
65:
51:
237:tag teaming
210:Main page:
196:Citizendium
406:Categories
357:References
292:Conclusion
273:Joke cabal
229:canvassing
66:This is a
25:See also:
255:Esperanza
170:mainspace
156:the term
139:consensus
104:WP:CABALS
96:Shortcuts
305:See also
259:WikiLove
111:WP:CABAL
68:humorous
235:and/or
231:and/or
181:History
299:WP:MFD
206:Types
192:Jimbo
166:users
160:cabal
144:cabal
71:essay
283:and
263:MfD
245:IRC
172:or
152:On
408::
301:.
279:,
202:.
395:)
162:"
158:"
146:.
73:.
46:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
