2858:
winners | Best Drama Actor Golden Globe (television) winners | Burials at Forest Lawn
Memorial Park (Glendale) | California Republicans | Cecil B. DeMille Award Golden Globe winners | Recipients of the Croix de Guerre (France) | Deaths from Alzheimer's disease | Deaths from cardiovascular disease | Deaths from pulmonary embolism | Disease-related deaths in California | Kennedy Center honorees | Mercersburg Academy alumni | People from California | People from Indiana, Pennsylvania | Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients | Princeton University alumni | RCA Victor Records artists | Recipients of the Distinguished Service Medal (United States) | Recipients of the Distinguished Flying Cross (United States) | Recipients of the Air Medal | Scots-Irish Americans | United States Air Force generals | Republicans (United States) | Western (genre) film actors | United States Army Air Force officers | American military personnel of World War II | United States Army Air Forces pilots of World War II | Actors who have served in the military
2934:. At one point her article had over 100 categories! An overwhelming majority of them were for clothing companies that she had worked for just once or twice. Not to mention the products that she had appeared in advertisements for such as Pepsi. And finally, porn companies are well known to produce compilation videos where there isn't any original content. They simply gather together four or five scenes of previously filmed material and repackage it as "Best of" collections or some other name. If a previously filmed scene which wasn't part of a MILF film to begin with were put into one of these compilations, I don't see how that would justify placing the actress in the MILF category.
2906:
somebody else interested in suspense thrillers can look in the analogous book and find
Stewart there. It doesn't matter to either reader that Stewart also appears in a book irrelevant to her own interests. Similarly, it doesn't worry me that Stewart is in lots of (to me) mumbojumboish military/aviation categories (though it does slightly amuse me): obviously they're significant to some editors, and if those editors want to maintain those categories then good for them. Who would be inconvenienced, and how, if the editors of articles on porn performers categorize these people by genre? What does "overcategorization" mean in this particular context? --
1633:-- or should I say "close to tipping over" this time? Excuse my #&*%, but I ain't never seen anyone pull a stunt like this before: we're deleting a category, and then somebody comes along and proposes re-naming another category to get the exact result that was just struck down? As it stands, we could just go back to the old discussion and copy over more than half of the comments given there. Praytell, how would the arguments given in the previous discussion not apply here?
670:. So since this current structure is ambiguous a better name is needed. This is a good example of why editors should not take it on themselves to make major structure changes while a discussion is open! Based on this, if the consensus is not to use units, then either this discussion needs to remain open to consider this concern, or closed and the new categories nominated to cleanup the mess that has been created. Based on this, I'm changing from just a comment to
1685:, and thanks for the heads=up. After dealing with a couple vampire articles over at AfD, interesting to see a vampire category. Once again, I find myself agreeing with Brownhairedgirl on the basic points- this category has six members that wouldn't be walking in the minefield- one, I note, no one has bothered to create. This category brings nothing to the project that the individual articles within it will not- so delete per
2053:. A posthumous promotion is a consequence of notability, not a cause of it, so it can hardly be considered a defining characteristic. This category groups articles from several different armed services in different time periods, so it's hard a relatively trivial issue such as this as forming a useful navigational aid between disparate groups. Two years after its creation, the head article
1312:. That was my "delete" !vote above (for some reason I wasn't logged in). Anyway, two responses a) John Carter's proposal for a category about the Fellowship was rejected at CFD, and as I said above it's out-of-order to try to achieve the same result by another route so soon after that CfD closed; b) yes, you're right: if restricted to the narrow purpose, the category is too small. --
2119:. No it's not as a defining. A medal places letters after the person's name, and the fact that they are then cited Joe Bloggs DSO or Joe Bloggs VC or whatever marks them out as someone who has committed a notable deed. However, a posthumous promotion allowing Colonel Bloggs to be be listed as Brigadier Bloggs does nothing to distinguish him from hordes of other Brigadiers. --
1401:, the possibility of its misuse for BLP purposes tips the balance strongly enough to make it a clear delete for me. The Fellowship clearly attracts some committed critics (for what I think are understandable reasons), and when there are so few articles to organise I see no point in exposing wikipedia to the BLP minefield of a category which is open to misuse. --
2839:
is a kind of actress. But "porn(ographic) actress/actor" is a conventionalized misnomer. These people's roles have much less in common with those of actors than they do with, say, fairground entertainers. ¶ Still, let's pursue choster's comparison. If the weasely "star" and "superhero" were defined, just what would be wrong with
128:, etc. However, the term "National Park area in State" would refer only to National Parks within a given State, and not to other areas like National Historic Sites, National Monuments, etc. that are under National Park Service control. I think the creator/users must have intended for the broader definition to apply.
2868:
I'd want to add "Romantic comedy film actors" and "Suspense film actors". If the editors of articles on porn flicks put more effort into categorizing their performers by genre than the editors of articles on feature films put put into categorizing their actors by what they actually did as actors, why
2838:
I don't find choster's comparison with the categorization by role of regular "actors" and "stars" satisfactory. The category under discussion now is limited by two constraints, of which one is "pornographic actresses". The regular rules of
English syntax seem to dictate that a "pornographic actress"
2101:
The "consequence of notability" argument is entirely specious. Any posthumous promotion is as defining as any medal received on whatever act earned the recognition. There are numerous categories that cross branches of armed service and time periods, and subcats can be created as needed to address the
96:
was created with sub-categories for each state after the opening of the original discussion, and there seems to be no consensus on the fate of those categories or their relationship to the categories under discussion. A fresh nomination may want to address some or all of the unresolved issues ... but
2924:
I would have less of a problem keeping a genre that was well defined and where the actors had better, more strict, criteria for inclusion in that genre but there just isn't any here. The production companies that make porn films don't have any problem with slapping the "MILF" label on any film that
2784:
It's a clearly defined genre and easily sourceable, and sourced. Not one reasonable Delete vote given at the AfD. There are no BlP or RS issues, as was repeatedly shown at the AfD, and at the individual articles. But the article was deleted anyway, so what the chance has this one got of surviving?
2766:
wikipedia should not be driven by the porn industries marketting hooks, there are almost never reliable, independent sources that describe someone as this. BLP concerns remain. And there is no strong argument for this category (this sort of defines overcategorization). I suppose a truly notable porn
424:
Besides continuing further to edit more of the items under discussion, Hmains indicates at his talk page that he sees that this "...CfD is not properly formed and will be thrown out as soon as reviewed by an administrator. You are not following any of the Cfd rules which are well established. I will
2929:
article states "...generally between 35 and 50 in age and not necessarily an actual mother". There is simply no strict criteria. Furthermore, would this category include those who are playing the part of the "daughter" who is being taught how to please a man by her "mother"? The actress wouldn't
2857:
Categories: 1908 births | 1997 deaths | Academy
Honorary Award recipients | Actors from Pennsylvania | American aviators | American film actors | American military personnel of the Vietnam War | American Presbyterians | American stage actors | American World War II pilots | Best Actor Academy Award
496:
I have tagged the three categories that the nominator listed at the top. I have not tagged any other similar categories for other states. So far there seems to be a reasonable consensus to rename these using the "System" name. The relisting here is largely procedural because the categories were not
2717:
I note that what are now described as "dozens" were "hundreds" then, but let's not quibble. My mind remains unnumbed by the notion of such a precedent. I mean, if people who like to create a category for each genre that a porn "actor"/"actress" (terminology I return to below) appears in, and do so
340:
and with several newer state-level list-articles, perhaps one or two being FLs too. All these list-articles are newer than these categories, I believe. All editors here support renaming to some consistent scheme and I think all but Reywas92 are indifferent or prefer "System". It would be much a
805:
states it is a subset of the 'List of areas' article. This article will have to change, if these components of NPS are going to be units. I did go through the effort of populating each state category with all NPS areas/units of that state, which was my primary goal. Renaming the cat names is a
696:
I agree most of these are not "areas", a term which seems not to be used on its own by the NPS. The correct term for the 392 NPS owned and operated properties appears to me to be "units". And "affiliated areas" for a few other ones. Every item in the "List of areas of the
National Park System"
405:
has been changing categories of items in the categories under discussion, while this CFD has been going on, before and after I notified him of the CFD. I am concerned that I may not have started the CFD properly, like if there is some way I should put a notice on each category under discussion.
89:
on all fronts. No consensus on whether the it should be "National Park
Service" or "National Park System". No consensus on whether the next word should be "area" or "unit", and no consensus on whether or not to explicitly mention the affiliated areas in the category names. It's now 34 days since
2905:
The point would be that somebody looking for actors in suspense thrillers (for example) could thereby find him. There are dead-tree biographical dictionary/encyclopedias of film. Somebody who's interested in romantic comedies can look at a dictionary of romantic comedies and find
Steward there;
2891:
argument (overcategorization is a well-known and widespread issue we try to address in this forum), you yourself acknowledge that Jimmy
Stewart was not just an actor in Westerns, but well-known in a variety of other genres. So what's the point of calling him a Western, comedy, romantic comedy,
824:
There are relatively few NPS affiliated areas, like zero or one or two per state, not worth creating a separate state-specific category system. Readers in most cases would be interested in navigating amongst all of, say, California's NPS units and affiliated areas together. I don't know what
1396:
it is misused for categorising individuals with hazily-defined associations with the
Fellowship. I'm not suggesting that misuse of the category was any part of the intentions of the nominator, who is clearly alert to the "BLP minefield"; but even if some editors feel that this category may
743:
Actually it is only Alaska, California, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, Virginia, Washington DC, Wisconsin and the Northern Mariana Islands that have affiliated areas (and Georgia,
380:
Why do you prefer that? I thot I stated good reasons to make the category change to "System" not to "Service". If you do not explain your reasoning I tend to think you did not consider all that has been discussed and then this !vote and perhaps other !votes should be disregarded.
517:. The only problem with this name is that some articles are not units since they are consider to be parts of other articles that are listed as the unit. Don't know if that creates an issue with the category or not. But at least this can be sourced to the NPS documents.
1042:
per Choster. The category has a list of attractions, many of which are not roller coasters. I do not know if the creation of a subcategory of Harry Potter roller coasters is a good idea since there are only two articles about it, and that would be overcategorization.
341:
bigger change, beyond our ability to accomplish here, to change all the list-articles to use "Service". So I suggest making this change to achieve consistency, now, without attempting here to determine whether "System" or "Service" is better for the list-articles.
2665:
I don't think that the AFD can be said to have formed a consensus that a category of this type would be more appropriate. If anything, the discussion would support the position that a category is equally if not more problematic, since BLP concerns were paramount.
544:
In an Act of August 18, 1970, the National Park System was defined in law as, "any area of land and water now or hereafter administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the National Park Service for park, monument, historic, parkway, recreational or other
828:
About "areas", I really don't have the impression that the NPS speaks of areas, other than for some Recreational Areas, though units and affiliated areas are both commonly used by NPS. As you do, i believe the core wikipedia article in this topic area is indeed
806:
minor piece of work. I did not add the affiliated areas in the state NPS categories; I thought someone might want to have them separately identified at the state level. I have not seen any disussion on this; a content desision should preceed a naming decision.
441:
Yes. None of the named (or unnamed) categories above were tagged with a {{subst:cfr}} to notify interested watchers of the said categories. I recommend that the reviewing administrator relist this and that somone tag each of the categories we are considering.
3107:. In the meantime you've given no reason to delete this. Grouping these (admittedly lesser known) Christian films by distributor isn't unreasonable (we do the same for distributors of secular films). PS please don't depopulate the category before nomination.--
3141:
relevant is that the category contains only 8 articles: 4 films, two people, one church, and its film-making activities. All of these articles are quite adequately interlinked, so even if all 8 articles are not deleted, the category is still un-necessary per
653:
It is not acceptable to use area in the category name since it is ambiguous, unless we only plan to include the actual named and listed areas in the category. If that is the case, then we would need a new state level parent. Using Nevada as an example,
2860:. I notice that the poor old chap died in three different ways; that aside, there's a bizarre concentration on military stuff and borderline trivia. Among all of this, "Western (genre) film actors" comes as a breath of sanity. Thinking of such films as
2237:
who was posthumously awarded the VC and promoted for his actions at Arnhem. Both of these awards (for want of a better word) were specifically for his actions and the promotion wasn't because he had been notable before the battle. While someone like
2925:
has some actress that simply looks older than her male co-star. I've seen numerous instances where a production will be termed as MILF and I know by having read about the female lead that she's only in her late 20s and doesn't have any kids. Our
583:'unit' may be the right name administrativly, but it is so bureaucratic. 'Area' better describes the land and water that we are dealing with here and which the reader would connect with more than 'unit'. It also follows the law quoted above: "any
1232:
Good point, 94.168.213.110. I suggest that the purpose of this category should make it clear that it is only for pages directly about The Fellowship, and not about alleged members where it becomes a part of a BLP minefield. In the discussion for
587:
of land and water now or hereafter administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the National Park Service for park, monument, historic, parkway, recreational or other purposes." Not 'unit'--'area'. And the main article is
2644:
2749:. This category, like the list, does not reflect reliable secondary source characterizations, but the video producers' marketing decisions; the selection criteria are simply the appearance of keywords in the film/video titles.
1390:(with a few supporters) to misrepresent sources to justify creating a category for "members" of this organisation, I have been scrutinising this CFR more carefully than usual, and I'm puzzled by the discrepancies here.
269:. I was confused when I tried to bring the listings together in a Category for the National Park Service/System and found only the titled "National Parks" in these state categories. Most authors separate the titled
1824:
1253:
744:
Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Tennessee, if their National Cemeteries are to be considered affiliated areas, as it seems they should be by my read of the List article). So for the 3 examples, it should be:
825:
content decision you might think is needed. This is the discussion about creating the relevant categories; there are no existing state-level categories of affiliated areas; it should just be decided here.
623:
1200:. There was a clear consensus there against such a category, and renaming another one to serve the same purpose would just be a backdoor way of achieving an outcome which has only just been rejected. --
3233:: Wrong venue for the complaint. Unless and until the allegedly unworthy articles don't exist to populate the category, the category should remain per TheFarix's response to the anon 94...110, above. —
2715:
It also presents a mind numbing precedent. If actors/actresses are categorized by each sub-genre that they work(ed) in then the number of categories could number in the hundreds for a single article.
618:
834:
802:
628:
593:
510:
655:
1580:
635:
93:
42:
37:
990:
200:
1506:
1197:
2802:
We do not classify by genre, as most actors and actresses work in more than one, and perpetual subdivision into sub-genres imposes a clutter cost that exceeds utility. If we don't have
1887:
Good work, Kevinkor2. I think that's much better than a category, especially because as Choyooł notes it can be monitored through watchlists, and that cannot be done with a category. --
830:
798:
589:
337:
188:
678:
and so on. Yes, I realize that these areas are actually 'Recreation Areas', but is that distinction sufficient in this case? I'm open to reconsider based on additional discussion.
1448:
1387:
1764:
2681:
1737:
Good idea, Peterkingiron. Regardless on what we decide for the category, a navbox is easier for a reader to navigate than a category. I have started such a navbox in "User:"
1354:. Something odd is going on here. The nominator says that "The main page for this category has been renamed", and all the !votes for renaming have been cast on that basis.
148:
2826:
per choster. As far as the category goes, this is not really singling out porn actors, since we don't categorize any actors by the type of film or role they appear in.
559:
To further confuse matters the National Park Service administers the National Register of Historic Places although they are often not part of the National Park System. –
139:
160:
833:, and I agree it could be modified slightly to use "units and affiliated areas" more consistently, but I don't think that need stop things here. The way that the
195:
729:
but skipping the "and affiliated areas" in states that have none of that type. This seems "bureaucratic" but that is a good thing, to apply an accurate label.
425:
not write anything there." I don't participate often at CFD and I don't know what CFD rules would rule out the validity of this CFD. Can anyone else explain?
638:. Offhand I think the "United States" is not needed in a category name that uses a specific U.S. state name, though it is helpful in the overall parent name.
555:
and the units are parts of the National Park System. Calling them official or unofficial seems problematic as all the units are official although some are are
2604:
697:
article is identified as either a "unit" (including most/all of the "Recreation Area" ones) or an "affiliated area". So, that leads me to think it should be:
406:
But, given one is aware of a CFD in process, shouldn't it be obvious that the category items under discussion should not be changed until a decision is made?
767:
756:
720:
709:
121:
2696:
As I said in the previous AFD mentioned by Good Ol'factory, this sets a dangerous precedent where many actors/actresses could be in dozens of categories.
704:
714:
1567:
There seems to be large % of sysops on that canvas? Is that due to it being a categories for discussion forum or is/was there more involved there? TIA --
1002:
2596:
1444:
1431:
21:
2259:-- there is ample content to Justify retention. WP does not like ranks in article names, so that the correct name does not give rise to difficulty.
2242:
was almost certainly promoted because he was already notable, Grayburn's promotion was an act of recognition in the same vein as Alansohn describes.
1649:
issue and way too likely to be misused, and the current one seems only to apply to a number of articles so small I can count them on my handclaws. -
2587:
1787:
1773:
1238:
1193:
2233:
Responding to the request for comments at Milhist. I didn't actually know this cat or article existed, if I had I'd probably have added it to
1180:
one would expect to see the Pope, patriarchs, some archbishops, and maybe Billy Graham in a category of "International Christian Leadership".--
3127:
this film studio and has going on a disruptive campaign of largely blanking the articles to one sentence stubs and prodding them for deletion.
17:
2576:
2220:
2131:
2069:
1899:
1723:(voted for rename above). An alternative might be to convert the category to a navbox template. If so, the category might be unnecessary.
1539:
1495:
1413:
1324:
1222:
941:
109:
3147:
2455:
1750:
1392:
Regardless of what's going on with the naming, this remains a category of only 4 articles, whose maximum scope appears to be six articles,
1202:
797:'Area' has a general meaning of land, and that is not changed by 'recreation area' using 'area' as well. I was reading the main article as
634:
These are new categories created by Hmains on December 2 and 3, I believe all after the first CFD was started. I think they all appear in
1939:. Second, a Navbox is easier to navigate for the reader than a category. Third, a Navbox is much easier to monitor for BLP violations. --
2391:
2292:
2030:
2022:
1264:
1452:
3084:
Unnecessary category with many non-notable articles which deserve deletion. All started by a single user for the purpose of promotion
2501:
2432:
2366:
1365:
1357:
1129:
751:
675:
667:
659:
514:
2450:. If there an ongoing problem of an editor creating categories which there is a consensus to delete, I urge the nominator to open an
761:
535:
663:
2013:
1505:
Hmmm. Right now, BrownHairedGirl, you are the only person with an opinion of "delete". Should I canvas people who gave opinions in
2353:
the category. If anyone wants to categorize them in any potential parent categories, they can do it easily enough - the pages are
452:
Twelve days later, and the categories still have not been tagged. After the nominator tags them, the debate should be relisted. --
1855:
Please edit and comment on the navbox. If we achieve consenus on it, we can move it to "Template:" and add it to the articles! --
1369:
1233:
Category:Members_of_the_Family_also_known_as_the_Fellowship, John Carter made a list of pages that would belong in this category:
1196:
is not appropriate, because one of the longest CfD discussions in the last few weeks has just decided against keeping a category
1125:
277:, I support renaming these categories to simplify the links in Knowledge (XXG) and to connect the public to the wider system. (
144:
3056:
2754:
2193:
2057:
remains an unreferenced stub, which does not suggest that it is regarded by military history editors as a significant topic. --
1757:
1673:
1591:
135:
125:
3179:
2848:
2811:
2382:
2144:
Many countries do not have the practice of using postnominals, so I'm not sure this argument holds water. Recipients of the
245:
156:
3137:; but unless and until they are deleted, concerns about notability are irrelevant to a decision to keep the category. What
2173:
This seems to be a reasonable category to me. A list of recipients article would be a good idea, as would expansion of the
2493:
1015:
958:
2767:
performer will have appeared in "Teen" "Milf" "Fetish" "Lesbian" etc etc porn in a career. These categories are of no use.
2888:
1507:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 4#Category:Members_of_the_Family_also_known_as_the_Fellowship
1198:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 4#Category:Members_of_the_Family_also_known_as_the_Fellowship
3244:
3225:
3202:
3183:
3155:
3111:
3093:
3041:
2977:
2968:
2943:
2915:
2896:
2878:
2830:
2818:
2794:
2776:
2758:
2741:
2727:
2705:
2688:
2670:
2660:
2633:
2581:
2509:
2480:
2463:
2436:
2376:
2298:
2268:
2251:
2225:
2161:
2136:
2111:
2093:
2074:
2007:
1948:
1923:
1904:
1882:
1864:
1732:
1715:
1698:
1677:
1657:
1637:
1607:
1595:
1574:
1562:
1544:
1518:
1500:
1471:
1440:
1435:
1427:
1418:
1346:
1329:
1302:
1282:
1227:
1184:
1172:
1153:
1117:
1058:
1032:
1009:
980:
946:
874:
849:
815:
785:
738:
687:
647:
605:
573:
526:
501:
485:
461:
443:
434:
415:
390:
371:
350:
323:
306:
286:
249:
232:
215:
174:
114:
3260:
3019:
2995:
2549:
2525:
2338:
2314:
1988:
1964:
1098:
1074:
1019:
954:
914:
890:
74:
2930:
be playing the part of the MILF but it is a MILF film... Furthermore, when I think of overcategorization, I think of
2358:
1878:
Well, at least those interested in the topic could have any changes made to the navbox flash up on their watchlist...
1711:
998:
2399:
3124:
3047:
2750:
1914:
Do not support the category renaming because we decided against a category. Support the Navbox as a helpful guide.
90:
this CfD was first listed, and since there is no consensus after nearly 5 weeks, I am not going to relist it again.
3108:
2738:
2572:
2216:
2157:
2127:
2065:
1895:
1840:
1604:
1571:
1535:
1491:
1409:
1320:
1258:
1218:
1181:
994:
937:
273:
from other units, so they can concentrate on the 'highlights' and have fewer places to gather information from.
241:
105:
3259:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2994:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2524:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2313:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1963:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1651:
1073:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
889:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
3219:
3151:
3064:
3018:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2548:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2497:
2489:
2459:
2362:
2337:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1987:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1206:
1097:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
967:
913:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
865:
which is a term divorced from the geographic reality and more appropriate to a description of a bureaucracy. --
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1694:
2840:
2803:
2656:
2772:
2287:
2264:
1728:
1467:
2844:
2807:
2181:
2505:
2426:
2247:
1919:
1707:
1690:
295:
rename; prefer "system" to "service" on the basis of the logic already given, but am okay with either. —
2852:
2652:
683:
522:
359:
282:
1368:
shows that it was created in 2004 and has only ever been a redirect to the article on the Fellowship.
265:
manages all these areas, the literature about the Service and the various areas, refers to them as the
3193:
the category groups articles by a defining characteristic. Notability is not properly addressed here.
3038:
2565:
2373:
2209:
2174:
2153:
2120:
2058:
2054:
1888:
1601:
1568:
1528:
1484:
1402:
1313:
1211:
1051:
930:
98:
3133:. If the nominator believes that the articles are on non-notable subjects, then that's a matter for
1524:
3212:
2974:
2964:
2827:
2790:
2685:
2667:
2189:
2004:
1944:
1860:
1558:
1514:
1298:
1278:
1149:
1114:
498:
482:
367:
473:
3198:
3175:
3165:
3089:
2768:
2629:
2282:
2260:
2107:
1724:
1463:
1342:
1030:
978:
319:
230:
2451:
1706:, similar enough to previous CfD to keep with previous precedence set forth in that decision. --
993:
would seem to indicate the category is for more than just coasters, paralleling categories like
3120:
2476:
2420:
2243:
2089:
1915:
1168:
845:
781:
734:
643:
430:
411:
386:
346:
211:
170:
3168:) that could probably be added back into the category. That's plenty for a proper category. —
3143:
2447:
1192:. As it stands, the category is clearly misnamed. However, mutating it into a category for
3236:
2941:
2703:
2239:
1879:
1634:
870:
811:
679:
662:
so one would think that the category is for like authorized areas. But then you would find
601:
518:
457:
298:
278:
3134:
3119:
Legitimate category contains a number of appropriate articles relating to the main subject
3104:
1646:
3035:
2911:
2874:
2723:
2370:
2148:
do not receive letters after the name although it the highest gallantry award in the US.
1803:
1742:
1248:
1044:
966:
To clarify that the category is about Harry Potter roller coasters and to correspond with
567:
2814:, I don't see how such a scheme is justifiable for types of pornographic films, either.-
1936:
1686:
1480:
1398:
1290:
3160:
If there were just three or four articles, I may agree. But there are 8, with two more (
2960:
2959:
I'd just like to say I'm sorry for some harsh words, and I hope we all meet in Heaven.
2931:
2786:
2185:
2149:
2145:
1940:
1856:
1667:
1585:
1554:
1510:
1294:
1274:
1145:
363:
3194:
3170:
3085:
2625:
2234:
2103:
1338:
1023:
971:
315:
225:
2893:
2815:
2472:
2085:
1600:
Not really that much of a thread. Anyways, just curious and thanks for the link. --
1164:
1006:
841:
840:
I think the last proposed category changes can just be decided upon and done here.
777:
730:
639:
426:
407:
382:
342:
207:
166:
2419:
Only four films. Not enough to warrant a category, as usual from this creator. --
2454:. However, CFD should be used to discuss categories rather than contributors. --
3161:
2936:
2698:
1808:
1243:
866:
807:
597:
453:
402:
2907:
2870:
2719:
2645:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of actresses in the MILF porn genre
2354:
560:
539:
2648:
1579:
Probably because the original category discussion gained a bit of attention
3012:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2542:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2331:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1981:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1091:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
907:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1289:
Hmmm, now that I think about it, this might result in a category that is
336:. Using "System" is consistent with the several years-old Featured List
224:
move to Service. I think these System lists should be moved to Service.
768:
Category:United States National Park Service units and affiliated areas
757:
Category:National Park Service units and affiliated areas in California
721:
Category:United States National Park Service units and affiliated areas
710:
Category:National Park Service units and affiliated areas in California
2280:
as the resulting list would be too broad for an encyclopedic article.
509:. Aren't these officially called 'units' with the lead article being
705:
Category:National Park Service units and affiliated areas in Arkansas
187:
areas. These seem to be addressing the units within the nation-wide
1825:
The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power
1360:
ever having been the location of an article on the Fellowship. The
1254:
The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power
715:
Category:National Park Service units and affiliated areas in Wyoming
191:. And the categories correspond somewhat to entries in lists like:
124:, various state-level categories that all seem misnamed. These are
476:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
1626:
So yeah, here's the first legally canvassed chime-ins. As before,
1462:
as nom to match main article. I see no vote there for renaming.
2926:
624:
Category:United States National Park Service areas in California
240:
to "...National Park System," which makes the most sense to me.
97:
please do remembe to tag all the categories under discussion. --
1746:
2973:
Probably likely only if we stop watching MILF pornography ...
619:
Category:United States National Park Service areas in Arkansas
2588:
Category:Pornographic actresses appearing in MILF pornography
2535:
Category:Pornographic actresses appearing in MILF pornography
1523:
I think that'd be a good idea. But for neutrality sake (per
1356:
However, this appears not to be true. I can find no trace of
835:
List of the United States National Park System official units
803:
List of the United States National Park System official units
629:
Category:United States National Park Service areas in Wyoming
594:
List of the United States National Park System official units
511:
List of the United States National Park System official units
656:
Category:United States National Park Service areas in Nevada
179:
Actually maybe they should all be renamed to "National Park
1527:), you'd have to notify them all. Is that too big a job? --
1380:; yet at the time the article on the Fellowship was called
636:
Category:United States National Park Service areas by state
94:
Category:United States National Park Service areas by state
991:
List of attractions at The Wizarding World of Harry Potter
201:
List of areas in the National Park System in Massachusetts
3253:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2988:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2647:
there was a concensus that category for actresses of the
2518:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2307:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1957:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1067:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
883:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
534:
I feel that the categories should be adhere to the form:
3072:
3068:
3060:
3052:
2892:
suspense thriller, biographic, and family film actor?-
2612:
2608:
2600:
2592:
2407:
2403:
2395:
2387:
2205:
2038:
2034:
2026:
2018:
1550:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1361:
1234:
831:
List of areas in the United States National Park System
799:
List of areas in the United States National Park System
590:
List of areas in the United States National Park System
538:
as the NPS refers to them as such. This NPS page about
338:
List of areas in the United States National Park System
189:
List of areas in the United States National Park System
596:
states it is a subset of the 'List of areas' article.
60:
Various categories of "National Park areas" by state
3263:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3022:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2998:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2718:according to the WP rules, where's the problem? --
2552:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2528:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2341:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2317:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1991:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1967:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1833:
1817:
1796:
1780:
1101:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1077:). No further edits should be made to this section.
917:). No further edits should be made to this section.
893:). No further edits should be made to this section.
481:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
77:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1265:List of individuals associated with the Fellowship
1144:The main page for this category has been renamed.
837:is a subset is that it omits the affiliated areas.
149:Category:National Park Service areas in California
1130:Category:The Fellowship (Christian organization)
752:Category:National Park Service units in Arkansas
676:Category:National Park Service units in Arkansas
515:Category:National Park Service units in Arkansas
140:Category:National Park Service areas in Arkansas
2737:- subjective category and overcategorisation.--
762:Category:National Park Service units in Wyoming
536:Category:National Park System Units in Arkansas
161:Category:National Park Service areas in Wyoming
196:List of National Park System areas in Maryland
2014:Category:Recipients of a posthumous promotion
1974:Category:Recipients of a posthumous promotion
1758:
1382:The Family (Christian political organization)
776:which is bureaucratic in a good way i think.
8:
2208:, which I should have done at the outset. --
122:Category:United States National Park Service
3103:if the articles deserve deletion, then try
1370:Category:International Christian Leadership
1126:Category:International Christian Leadership
1084:Category:International Christian Leadership
513:? If so then the correct name is probably
1935:for three reasons. First, the category is
1765:
1751:
1743:
1003:Category:Space Shuttle tourist attractions
145:Category:National Park areas in California
18:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion
1483:, why have a category for 5 articles? --
136:Category:National Park areas in Arkansas
126:Category:National Park areas in Arkansas
2849:Category:Actors who portray superheroes
2812:Category:Actors who portray superheroes
1788:The Fellowship (Christian organization)
1774:The Fellowship (Christian organization)
1291:small with limited potential for growth
1239:The Fellowship (Christian organization)
1194:The Fellowship (Christian organization)
157:Category:National Park areas in Wyoming
547:My thinking is that the National Park
2494:Category:Films based on Marvel comics
1016:Category:Harry Potter roller coasters
1014:Hmm, then it might be worth creating
959:Category:Harry Potter roller coasters
332:renaming, and prefer renaming to use
7:
2152:recipients do receive posnominals.
2001:no consensus to delete or to listify
1293:. A reason to delete it, perhaps? --
666:which are not areas in the sense of
615:This discussion should address also:
261:may be more appropriate. While the
2651:genre is more usefull than a list.
1378:added to the article a minute later
183:" areas rather than "National Park
3123:. Seems that the nominator simply
2869:criticize the former endeavor? --
2367:The First Avenger: Captain America
1426:to match title of parent article.
1366:International Christian Leadership
1358:International Christian Leadership
1337:to match title of parent article.
668:Lake Mead National Recreation Area
660:Lake Mead National Recreation Area
314:to match title of parent article.
28:
3231:Speedy keep on procedural grounds
3029:The result of the discussion was:
2559:The result of the discussion was:
2348:The result of the discussion was:
1998:The result of the discussion was:
1509:so we can get more discussion? --
1108:The result of the discussion was:
1020:Category:Harry Potter attractions
955:Category:Harry Potter attractions
924:The result of the discussion was:
900:Category:Harry Potter attractions
664:Category:National parks in Nevada
257:the idea of renaming. Although,
84:The result of the discussion was:
2276:as an appropriate category, and
1665:- I think I've said why before.
861:I object to the use of the term
2680:. Similar category was deleted
999:Category:Disney roller coasters
2383:Category:Captain America films
2324:Category:Captain America films
551:administers the National Park
1:
3245:19:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
3226:04:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
3203:03:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
3184:23:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
3156:20:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
3112:12:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
3094:02:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
3042:08:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
2978:04:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
2969:21:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2944:20:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2916:16:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2897:16:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2879:14:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2851:? ¶ Let's look at the actor
2831:20:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2819:18:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2795:18:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2777:18:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2759:17:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2742:12:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2728:14:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2706:08:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2689:06:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2671:06:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2661:04:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2634:03:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2624:Arbitrary category criteria.
2582:14:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
2510:05:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2481:16:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2464:15:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2437:06:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2377:09:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
2299:03:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
2269:17:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
2252:20:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
2226:16:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
2162:16:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
2137:18:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2112:03:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
2094:16:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2075:13:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
2008:08:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
1949:15:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
1924:21:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
1905:13:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
1883:02:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
1865:02:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
1733:20:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1716:17:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1699:16:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1678:12:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1658:09:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1638:09:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1608:17:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1596:16:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1575:15:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1563:09:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1545:02:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1519:00:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
1501:22:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
1472:17:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
1441:Zerschmettert die Schändliche
1436:17:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
1428:Zerschmettert die Schändliche
1419:11:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
1347:03:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
1330:03:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
1303:01:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
1283:01:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
1228:20:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
1185:18:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
1173:18:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
1154:18:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
1118:08:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
1059:07:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
1033:23:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
1010:22:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
981:21:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
947:14:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
875:17:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
850:04:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
816:03:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
786:17:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
739:17:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
688:19:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
648:05:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
606:04:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
574:01:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
527:22:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
502:22:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
486:22:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
462:16:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
444:14:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
30:
1386:Given the recent efforts by
435:07:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
416:01:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
391:01:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
372:22:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
351:20:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
324:02:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
307:19:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
287:14:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
250:05:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
233:03:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
216:02:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
175:02:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
2359:Captain America (1990 film)
995:Category:Disney attractions
131:Propose 30 or so renames:
115:02:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
3280:
3048:Category:Sherwood Pictures
3005:Category:Sherwood Pictures
2862:The Shop around the Corner
1841:National Prayer Breakfast
1645:; the proposed name is a
1259:National Prayer Breakfast
3256:Please do not modify it.
3015:Please do not modify it.
2991:Please do not modify it.
2545:Please do not modify it.
2521:Please do not modify it.
2498:Category:Superhero films
2490:Category:Captain America
2363:Captain America (serial)
2334:Please do not modify it.
2310:Please do not modify it.
2051:Delete, possibly listify
1984:Please do not modify it.
1960:Please do not modify it.
1933:Create Navbox and delete
1880:ChoyooĹ‚ĘĽÄŻÄŻhĂ:Seb az86556
1635:ChoyooĹ‚ĘĽÄŻÄŻhĂ:Seb az86556
1094:Please do not modify it.
1070:Please do not modify it.
968:Category:Roller coasters
910:Please do not modify it.
886:Please do not modify it.
70:Please do not modify it.
2841:Category:Comedic actors
2804:Category:Comedic actors
1388:a single-purpose editor
929:(i.e. do not rename) --
801:; the starting text of
592:; the starting text of
3082:Nominator's rationale:
2710:Here's what you said:
2622:Nominator's rationale:
2417:Nominator's rationale:
2048:Nominator's rationale:
1374:created on 2 July 2009
1263:the yet to be created
1135:Nominator's rationale:
964:Nominator's rationale:
3210:per Scott MacDonald.
2845:Category:Action stars
2808:Category:Action stars
2751:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
1453:few or no other edits
360:National Park Service
263:National Park Serivce
2175:Posthumous promotion
2055:posthumous promotion
1455:outside this topic.
1018:as s subcategory of
267:National Park System
259:National Park System
242:A Stop at Willoughby
2889:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
2206:notified WP:MILHIST
1549:Not too big a job.
1163:per reasons above.
2887:Leaving aside the
1397:marginally escape
120:~I notice, within
3121:Sherwood Pictures
2580:
2446:per nom, and per
2224:
2198:
2184:comment added by
2135:
2073:
1903:
1849:
1848:
1708:RightCowLeftCoast
1543:
1499:
1456:
1417:
1328:
1226:
945:
488:
113:
92:Meanwhile, a new
51:
50:
3271:
3258:
3239:
3222:
3215:
3077:
3076:
3017:
2993:
2939:
2701:
2617:
2616:
2571:
2568:
2547:
2523:
2423:
2412:
2411:
2336:
2312:
2295:
2290:
2285:
2240:Isoroku Yamamoto
2215:
2212:
2197:
2178:
2126:
2123:
2064:
2061:
2043:
2042:
1986:
1962:
1894:
1891:
1767:
1760:
1753:
1744:
1654:
1551:Canvassing done.
1534:
1531:
1490:
1487:
1438:
1408:
1405:
1362:revision history
1319:
1316:
1217:
1214:
1123:Propose renaming
1096:
1072:
1056:
1049:
1028:
976:
952:Propose renaming
936:
933:
912:
888:
571:
565:
557:Affliated Areas.
480:
478:
301:
228:
104:
101:
72:
47:
36:
31:
3279:
3278:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3261:deletion review
3254:
3235:
3220:
3213:
3109:Scott Mac (Doc)
3050:
3046:
3020:deletion review
3013:
3007:
3002:
2996:deletion review
2989:
2975:Good Ol’factory
2935:
2828:Good Ol’factory
2739:Scott Mac (Doc)
2712:Delete per nom.
2697:
2686:Good Ol’factory
2668:Good Ol’factory
2590:
2586:
2566:
2550:deletion review
2543:
2537:
2532:
2526:deletion review
2519:
2421:
2385:
2381:
2339:deletion review
2332:
2326:
2321:
2315:deletion review
2308:
2293:
2288:
2283:
2257:Keep or listify
2210:
2179:
2154:David Underdown
2121:
2059:
2016:
2012:
2005:Good Ol’factory
1989:deletion review
1982:
1976:
1971:
1965:deletion review
1958:
1889:
1850:
1845:
1829:
1813:
1804:Abraham Vereide
1792:
1776:
1771:
1676:
1652:
1594:
1529:
1485:
1403:
1314:
1249:Abraham Vereide
1212:
1182:Scott Mac (Doc)
1143:
1115:Good Ol’factory
1099:deletion review
1092:
1086:
1081:
1075:deletion review
1068:
1052:
1045:
1024:
1001:is a child) or
972:
931:
915:deletion review
908:
902:
897:
891:deletion review
884:
764:and nation-wide
717:and nation-wide
568:
561:
499:Good Ol’factory
494:Relisting note:
483:Good Ol’factory
471:
400:Update/problems
312:Support Renames
297:
226:
99:
75:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
3277:
3275:
3266:
3265:
3249:
3248:
3247:
3228:
3214:American Eagle
3205:
3188:
3187:
3186:
3148:94.168.213.110
3128:
3114:
3097:
3096:
3079:
3078:
3044:
3025:
3024:
3008:
3006:
3003:
3001:
3000:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2932:Cindy Crawford
2919:
2918:
2900:
2899:
2882:
2881:
2833:
2821:
2797:
2779:
2761:
2744:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2691:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2637:
2636:
2619:
2618:
2584:
2555:
2554:
2538:
2536:
2533:
2531:
2530:
2514:
2513:
2483:
2466:
2456:94.168.213.110
2440:
2439:
2414:
2413:
2379:
2344:
2343:
2327:
2325:
2322:
2320:
2319:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2278:do not listify
2271:
2254:
2228:
2199:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2150:Victoria Cross
2146:Medal of Honor
2096:
2078:
2077:
2045:
2044:
2010:
1994:
1993:
1977:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1969:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1847:
1846:
1844:
1843:
1837:
1835:
1831:
1830:
1828:
1827:
1821:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1812:
1811:
1806:
1800:
1798:
1794:
1793:
1791:
1790:
1784:
1782:
1778:
1777:
1772:
1770:
1769:
1762:
1755:
1747:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1718:
1701:
1691:Bradjamesbrown
1680:
1672:
1660:
1640:
1631:towards delete
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1590:
1457:
1424:Support Rename
1421:
1391:
1385:
1355:
1349:
1335:Support Rename
1332:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1286:
1285:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1203:94.168.213.110
1187:
1175:
1157:
1156:
1138:
1132:
1120:
1104:
1103:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1079:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1037:
1036:
1035:
984:
983:
961:
949:
920:
919:
903:
901:
898:
896:
895:
879:
878:
877:
855:
854:
853:
852:
838:
826:
819:
818:
791:
790:
789:
788:
771:
770:
765:
759:
754:
748:
747:
746:
745:
741:
724:
723:
718:
712:
707:
701:
700:
699:
698:
691:
690:
632:
631:
626:
621:
616:
609:
608:
577:
576:
529:
504:
490:
489:
479:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
447:
446:
439:
438:
437:
419:
418:
396:
395:
394:
393:
375:
374:
353:
328:As nominator,
326:
309:
290:
271:National Parks
252:
238:Support rename
235:
204:
203:
198:
164:
163:
154:
153:etc., etc., to
151:
142:
118:
117:
91:
80:
79:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3276:
3264:
3262:
3257:
3251:
3250:
3246:
3243:
3240:
3238:
3232:
3229:
3227:
3223:
3217:
3216:
3209:
3206:
3204:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3177:
3173:
3172:
3167:
3163:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3144:WP:OCAT#SMALL
3140:
3136:
3132:
3129:
3126:
3122:
3118:
3115:
3113:
3110:
3106:
3102:
3099:
3098:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3083:
3080:
3074:
3070:
3066:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3049:
3045:
3043:
3040:
3037:
3033:
3030:
3027:
3026:
3023:
3021:
3016:
3010:
3009:
3004:
2999:
2997:
2992:
2986:
2985:
2979:
2976:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2966:
2962:
2958:
2955:
2954:
2945:
2942:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2901:
2898:
2895:
2890:
2886:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2880:
2876:
2872:
2867:
2863:
2859:
2854:
2853:James Stewart
2850:
2846:
2842:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2817:
2813:
2809:
2805:
2801:
2798:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2783:
2780:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2769:Bali ultimate
2765:
2762:
2760:
2756:
2752:
2748:
2745:
2743:
2740:
2736:
2733:
2729:
2725:
2721:
2716:
2713:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2704:
2700:
2695:
2692:
2690:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2676:
2672:
2669:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2653:Klassikkomies
2650:
2646:
2642:
2639:
2638:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2620:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2589:
2585:
2583:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2563:
2560:
2557:
2556:
2553:
2551:
2546:
2540:
2539:
2534:
2529:
2527:
2522:
2516:
2515:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2484:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2467:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2448:WP:OCAT#SMALL
2445:
2442:
2441:
2438:
2434:
2431:
2428:
2424:
2418:
2415:
2409:
2405:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2384:
2380:
2378:
2375:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2349:
2346:
2345:
2342:
2340:
2335:
2329:
2328:
2323:
2318:
2316:
2311:
2305:
2304:
2300:
2297:
2296:
2291:
2286:
2279:
2275:
2272:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2261:Peterkingiron
2258:
2255:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2236:
2235:Jack Grayburn
2232:
2229:
2227:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2207:
2203:
2200:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2176:
2172:
2169:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2118:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2100:
2097:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2080:
2079:
2076:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2056:
2052:
2049:
2046:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2015:
2011:
2009:
2006:
2002:
1999:
1996:
1995:
1992:
1990:
1985:
1979:
1978:
1973:
1968:
1966:
1961:
1955:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1910:
1906:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1881:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1842:
1839:
1838:
1836:
1832:
1826:
1823:
1822:
1820:
1816:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1801:
1799:
1795:
1789:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1768:
1763:
1761:
1756:
1754:
1749:
1748:
1745:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1725:Peterkingiron
1722:
1719:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1675:
1670:
1669:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1648:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1632:
1630:
1625:
1609:
1606:
1603:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1593:
1588:
1587:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1570:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1526:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1482:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:Peterkingiron
1461:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1400:
1395:
1389:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1311:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1266:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1210:
1208:
1204:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1141:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1095:
1089:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1076:
1071:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1050:
1048:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1027:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
989:
986:
985:
982:
979:
977:
975:
969:
965:
962:
960:
956:
953:
950:
948:
943:
939:
935:
928:
925:
922:
921:
918:
916:
911:
905:
904:
899:
894:
892:
887:
881:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
857:
856:
851:
847:
843:
839:
836:
832:
827:
823:
822:
821:
820:
817:
813:
809:
804:
800:
796:
793:
792:
787:
783:
779:
775:
774:
773:
772:
769:
766:
763:
760:
758:
755:
753:
750:
749:
742:
740:
736:
732:
728:
727:
726:
725:
722:
719:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
702:
695:
694:
693:
692:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
652:
651:
650:
649:
645:
641:
637:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
614:
611:
610:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
586:
582:
579:
578:
575:
572:
570:
566:
564:
558:
554:
550:
546:
541:
537:
533:
530:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
503:
500:
495:
492:
491:
487:
484:
477:
475:
470:
469:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
449:
448:
445:
440:
436:
432:
428:
423:
422:
421:
420:
417:
413:
409:
404:
401:
398:
397:
392:
388:
384:
379:
378:
377:
376:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
352:
348:
344:
339:
335:
331:
327:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
308:
305:
302:
300:
294:
291:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
234:
231:
229:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
202:
199:
197:
194:
193:
192:
190:
186:
182:
177:
176:
172:
168:
162:
158:
155:
152:
150:
146:
143:
141:
137:
134:
133:
132:
129:
127:
123:
116:
111:
107:
103:
95:
88:
85:
82:
81:
78:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
3255:
3252:
3241:
3234:
3230:
3211:
3207:
3190:
3169:
3138:
3130:
3125:doesn't like
3116:
3100:
3081:
3031:
3028:
3014:
3011:
2990:
2987:
2956:
2865:
2861:
2856:
2835:
2823:
2799:
2781:
2763:
2746:
2734:
2714:
2711:
2693:
2677:
2641:Strong keep.
2640:
2621:
2561:
2558:
2544:
2541:
2520:
2517:
2502:76.66.192.35
2485:
2468:
2443:
2429:
2422:AnmaFinotera
2416:
2350:
2347:
2333:
2330:
2309:
2306:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2256:
2244:Ranger Steve
2230:
2204:I have just
2201:
2170:
2141:
2116:
2098:
2081:
2050:
2047:
2000:
1997:
1983:
1980:
1959:
1956:
1932:
1916:Likesausages
1911:
1875:
1720:
1703:
1682:
1666:
1662:
1650:
1642:
1628:
1627:
1584:
1476:
1459:
1423:
1393:
1351:
1334:
1309:
1201:
1189:
1177:
1160:
1139:
1137:(see below)
1134:
1122:
1110:
1107:
1093:
1090:
1069:
1066:
1053:
1046:
1039:
1025:
987:
973:
963:
951:
926:
923:
909:
906:
885:
882:
862:
858:
794:
671:
633:
612:
584:
580:
569:
562:
556:
552:
548:
543:
542:states that
540:nomenclature
531:
506:
493:
472:
399:
355:
333:
329:
311:
303:
296:
292:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
237:
221:
205:
184:
180:
178:
165:
130:
119:
87:No consensus
86:
83:
69:
66:
3237:SMcCandlish
3166:Tracy Goode
3162:Erin Bethea
2180:—Preceding
1809:Douglas Coe
1781:Main topics
1687:WP:OC#SMALL
1481:WP:OC#SMALL
1451:) has made
1399:WP:OC#SMALL
1376:and it was
1244:Douglas Coe
680:Vegaswikian
519:Vegaswikian
403:User:Hmains
299:SMcCandlish
279:Chris Light
55:December 14
43:December 15
38:December 13
3039:Od Mishehu
2569:HairedGirl
2374:Od Mishehu
2355:3 Dev Adam
2213:HairedGirl
2124:HairedGirl
2062:HairedGirl
1892:HairedGirl
1834:Activities
1532:HairedGirl
1525:WP:CANVASS
1488:HairedGirl
1406:HairedGirl
1317:HairedGirl
1215:HairedGirl
997:(of which
934:HairedGirl
545:purposes."
356:Rename all
102:HairedGirl
3036:עוד מישהו
2961:Dekkappai
2787:Dekkappai
2649:MILF porn
2471:per nom.
2371:עוד מישהו
2186:Dthomsen8
2177:article.
2084:per nom.
1941:Kevinkor2
1937:too small
1857:Kevinkor2
1818:Criticism
1668:Jauerback
1586:Jauerback
1555:Kevinkor2
1511:Kevinkor2
1295:Kevinkor2
1275:Kevinkor2
1146:Kevinkor2
658:includes
364:Debresser
275:Therefore
3195:Alansohn
3086:SuaveArt
2626:Tabercil
2577:contribs
2433:contribs
2221:contribs
2194:contribs
2182:unsigned
2132:contribs
2104:Alansohn
2070:contribs
1900:contribs
1540:contribs
1496:contribs
1477:Question
1449:contribs
1414:contribs
1339:Alansohn
1325:contribs
1223:contribs
942:contribs
497:tagged.
474:Relisted
316:Alansohn
227:Reywas92
110:contribs
20: |
3242:‹(-¿-)›
3061:history
2957:Comment
2894:choster
2866:Vertigo
2855:. He's
2836:Comment
2816:choster
2678:Comment
2601:history
2486:Upmerge
2473:GoodDay
2396:history
2231:Comment
2202:Comment
2142:Comment
2102:issue.
2086:GoodDay
2027:history
1912:Comment
1876:Comment
1797:Leaders
1721:Comment
1629:leaning
1352:Hang On
1310:Comment
1178:Re-name
1165:GoodDay
1161:Re-name
1007:choster
842:doncram
795:comment
778:doncram
731:doncram
640:doncram
613:comment
581:comment
549:Service
532:Comment
507:Comment
427:doncram
408:doncram
383:doncram
343:doncram
330:Support
304:‹(-¿-)›
293:Support
255:Support
222:Support
208:doncram
185:Service
167:doncram
3131:Delete
3105:WP:AFD
2937:Dismas
2824:Delete
2800:Delete
2764:Delete
2747:Delete
2735:Delete
2699:Dismas
2694:Delete
2573:(talk)
2562:Delete
2469:Delete
2444:Delete
2351:Delete
2217:(talk)
2128:(talk)
2082:Delete
2066:(talk)
1896:(talk)
1704:Delete
1683:Delete
1663:Delete
1653:Jeremy
1643:Delete
1605:(talk)
1572:(talk)
1536:(talk)
1492:(talk)
1479:. Per
1460:Rename
1410:(talk)
1394:unless
1321:(talk)
1219:(talk)
1190:Delete
1140:Rename
1111:delete
938:(talk)
867:Bejnar
859:Object
808:Hmains
672:Rename
598:Hmains
553:System
454:Orlady
334:System
181:System
106:(talk)
3171:Farix
3069:watch
3065:links
2908:Hoary
2871:Hoary
2847:, or
2720:Hoary
2609:watch
2605:links
2567:Brown
2452:RFC/U
2404:watch
2400:links
2294:Space
2211:Brown
2122:Brown
2117:Reply
2060:Brown
2035:watch
2031:links
1890:Brown
1674:dude.
1592:dude.
1530:Brown
1486:Brown
1404:Brown
1315:Brown
1213:Brown
1054:۞pεth
932:Brown
863:units
563:droll
206:etc.
100:Brown
46:: -->
16:<
3221:talk
3208:Keep
3199:talk
3191:Keep
3164:and
3152:talk
3146:. --
3117:Keep
3101:Keep
3090:talk
3073:logs
3057:talk
3053:edit
3032:Keep
2965:talk
2927:MILF
2912:talk
2875:talk
2864:and
2791:talk
2782:Keep
2773:talk
2755:talk
2724:talk
2682:here
2657:talk
2630:talk
2613:logs
2597:talk
2593:edit
2512:----
2506:talk
2496:and
2477:talk
2460:talk
2427:talk
2408:logs
2392:talk
2388:edit
2365:and
2289:From
2284:Them
2274:Keep
2265:talk
2248:talk
2190:talk
2171:Keep
2158:talk
2108:talk
2099:Keep
2090:talk
2039:logs
2023:talk
2019:edit
1945:talk
1920:talk
1861:talk
1729:talk
1712:talk
1695:talk
1581:here
1559:talk
1515:talk
1468:talk
1445:talk
1432:talk
1372:was
1343:talk
1299:talk
1279:talk
1207:talk
1169:talk
1150:talk
1047:LoĐŻd
1040:Keep
1022:? —
988:Keep
970:. —
927:Keep
871:talk
846:talk
812:talk
782:talk
735:talk
684:talk
644:talk
602:talk
585:area
523:talk
458:talk
431:talk
412:talk
387:talk
368:talk
358:per
347:talk
320:talk
283:talk
246:talk
212:talk
171:talk
35:<
3135:AFD
2810:or
2806:or
2643:In
2575:• (
2488:to
2219:• (
2130:• (
2068:• (
1898:• (
1647:BLP
1602:Tom
1569:Tom
1538:• (
1494:• (
1412:• (
1364:of
1323:• (
1221:• (
1128:to
1005:.-
957:to
940:• (
674:to
159:to
147:to
138:to
108:• (
22:Log
3224:)
3201:)
3182:)
3178:|
3154:)
3139:is
3092:)
3071:|
3067:|
3063:|
3059:|
3055:|
3034:.
2967:)
2914:)
2877:)
2843:,
2793:)
2775:)
2757:)
2726:)
2684:.
2659:)
2632:)
2611:|
2607:|
2603:|
2599:|
2595:|
2564:--
2508:)
2500:-
2492:,
2479:)
2462:)
2435:)
2406:|
2402:|
2398:|
2394:|
2390:|
2369:.
2361:,
2357:,
2267:)
2250:)
2196:)
2192:•
2160:)
2110:)
2092:)
2037:|
2033:|
2029:|
2025:|
2021:|
2003:.
1947:)
1922:)
1863:)
1731:)
1714:)
1697:)
1689:.
1583:.
1561:)
1553:--
1517:)
1470:)
1447:•
1439:—
1434:)
1345:)
1301:)
1281:)
1273:--
1171:)
1152:)
1113:.
1043:--
873:)
848:)
814:)
784:)
737:)
686:)
646:)
604:)
525:)
460:)
433:)
414:)
389:)
370:)
362:.
349:)
322:)
285:)
248:)
214:)
173:)
3218:(
3197:(
3180:c
3176:t
3174:(
3150:(
3088:(
3075:)
3051:(
2963:(
2940:|
2910:(
2873:(
2789:(
2771:(
2753:(
2722:(
2702:|
2655:(
2628:(
2615:)
2591:(
2579:)
2504:(
2475:(
2458:(
2430:·
2425:(
2410:)
2386:(
2263:(
2246:(
2223:)
2188:(
2156:(
2134:)
2106:(
2088:(
2072:)
2041:)
2017:(
1943:(
1918:(
1902:)
1859:(
1766:e
1759:t
1752:v
1727:(
1710:(
1693:(
1671:/
1589:/
1557:(
1542:)
1513:(
1498:)
1466:(
1443:(
1430:(
1416:)
1384:.
1341:(
1327:)
1297:(
1277:(
1225:)
1209:)
1205:(
1167:(
1148:(
1142:.
1026:Îľ
974:Îľ
944:)
869:(
844:(
810:(
780:(
733:(
682:(
642:(
600:(
521:(
456:(
429:(
410:(
385:(
366:(
345:(
318:(
289:)
281:(
244:(
210:(
169:(
112:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.