1773:. I doubt this will lead to a rash of categories regarding case locations for attorneys-- Guantanamo Bay is unique because it's so high-profile, yet no one is going there except military or federal employees and these attorneys, (no American can even legally travel to Cuba!) they are taking on cases which often position them directly against the federal government, they are often law professors or academics who are notable in their own right for many accomplishments yet are volunteering their time to represent these prisoners, and they are pretty much the only 'outsiders' who can say what the prisoners are like or what Guantanamo Bay is like. These are not your run-of-the-mill legal cases. It's interesting to find the attorneys involved in the cases for all these reasons, and this category is extremely useful in that respect. There are many cases which may meet one or two of the above, but I can't think of a series of defendants and cases occurring right now which are marked by all the above criteria.--
564:. We should be especially wary about moves that may be perceived as censoring of our critics. However, we as a community seem to harbor little such restraint (see the 14 nominations for deletions of the article about Daniel Brandt). Knowledge (XXG) is an institution that is eminently criticizable on the grounds of our working focus in a world of information wars. If someone has criticized Knowledge (XXG) to the extent that is has been found worthy of inclusion in their Knowledge (XXG) article, there should be no problem adding this category to their article. The dilemma asserted by Otto4711 of people in this category who have made mere passing comments criticizing Knowledge (XXG), then the problem is obviously the article which should be purged of such trivial information. __
1911:
ways the historical era worst covered here. Why one should have categories on prosecutors rather than the defense escapes me. The sensible thing would seem to be to add more subcategories, not delete one. Randomly selecting many more people in the category, I didn't find any whose
Guantanamo participation seemed of "just another client among hundreds" type, they were identified as such in the lead, had news articles so identifying them, etc.; It seems to be something many RS's consider notable and defining - the way that defending someone imprisoned at an ordinary location is not, and would not even be mentioned by sources, let alone highlighted.
231:, based on the consensus/voted here. But we need to make sure this category doesn't get filled with crap. For instance, surely Knowledge (XXG) Review and Conservapedia belong if this category exists, because they are defined by their Criticism of Knowledge (XXG). On the other hand, The Times, clearly does not belong. The article didn't mention those criticisms anywhere, and it was quite shameful to see this category among the others. The Times is not notable/categorized because of their criticism of us. Please, volunteers, watch this category, and help clean it up. -
1839:
represents a significantly reported-on element in a major legal battle with international consequences. i doubt this puts us at risk of having other categories like it, unless another similar event occurs and results in media reports describing a group of lawyers based on their clientele or location of clientele. If someone wanted to try to put together a category of, say, lawyers for the nuremburg war criminals, IF at the time there was any notability (were they ostracized, were they considered heroes by some, even if reluctantly), i might support it.
346:
criteria for including an article in this category could be vague at times (im sure there are media commentators or publications that have both praised and criticized WP) but in these cases you could always include them in BOTH categories, if there was a WP booster category. and this is a fairly significant subject, considering what WP is now. i would be inclined to delete more trivial "critics" categories, say, "critics of canadas cat registration policies"
1929:
like U.S. military prosecutors—so I'd say that category would not even be appropriately defining for them. They probably each took half a dozen cases, maximum. That's not a full-time, defining employment position. I can name half a dozen ICTY prosecutors off the top of my head, but zero lawyers who defended ICTY clients. Sadly, that's just the way it is in this "industry".
582:"Worthy of inclusion in their article" translates to documented by reliable sources. Simply appearing in reliable sources does not mean that criticizing Knowledge (XXG) is a defining characteristic of the person, otherwise every verified fact would be subject to categorization. We should be equally concerned about painting people as "critics".
2052:
attorneys have represented a group of clients who are individuals detained by U.S. military authorities, which would address the purported problem while keeping a defining characteristic as an aid to navigation. The reliable and verifiable sources that
Knowledge (XXG) requires have no trouble defining lawyers on this basis.
1860:(an even narrower, already existing, category) is a defining characteristic. Nothing at all like "Alcatraz attorney", something which one be hard put to reliably source, as no one normally cares which particular prison an attorney's client is at, unlike these unusual situations. To take a randomly chose example
1974:
defense lawyers and the venues in which they practice is nowhere near the strength that association between prosecutors and their venues. It is unsurprising that attorneys' Gitmo participation "figure prominently" in their articles, but "figures prominently" doesn't equate to "defining characteristic".
1015:
obviously, students play on university sports teams world-wide. The term 'college athlete' however is strictly North
American usage, isn t it? And I wonder how notable playing university sport in other countries is whereas in the States, the top tier are essentially top-level professional for their
310:
There exists organisations and individuals who can be considered to be critics of
Knowledge (XXG). In most circumstances I expect there will be little difficulty coming to the conclusion that someone is a critic so I don't foresee any real problems in deciding whether or not to add an article to this
1928:
Because often in these situations for prosecutors that's their job, whereas for defence attorneys they are defending one client and this is just one of the clients that they serve—they are not full-time G.B. attorneys. In this situation, the G.B. prosecutors are not full-time positions—they are more
644:
A rather clear and defining characteristic. The "masturbatory" criticism that we are unable to determine who belongs in the category belongs at the level of individual articles, and we don't need to be jerked around here with claims that we are unable to decide that the category is defining. Results
391:
main article and articles categorized here generally do appear to be quite clear about the nature of their various criticisms. As for it serving "no useful purpose to the encyclopaedia" it seems to me to serve no more or less useful a purpose than any other category. My concern is that the nominator
1882:
Prosecutors and judges of international tribunals are somewhat different than the defence attorneys at said tribunals. The prosecutors and judges are usually employed by the tribunal; generally, the defence lawyers are not. There's no category for those who defended the
Japanese at the IMTFE or the
1838:
While we may routinely make decisions on how to categorize articles, the basis for categorization comes essentially from the documented information on the article's subject, not on our understanding of how the subject of an article is or should be portrayed or described. it seems that this category
345:
we have other categories which include the word critics or criticism, including critics of
Scientology. while i dont like LISTS which have arbitrary or nonrational criteria for entry, it seems categories can be more inclusive, and can help readers find what they are looking for. i do agree that the
2051:
Looking through the articles in the category, the fact that these lawyers have represented
Guantanamo clients seems to be their primary defining characteristic. The unfortunately characteristic choice to delete a category in its entirety could be obviated by proposing a name that shows that these
1910:
I don't think the absence of
Nuremburg and Tokyo categories is due to a bad sort of "recentism", just natural recentism - the fact that they predate the net and wikipedia, making article creation harder and less urgent, and are just a case of systematic bias - the mid twentieth century is in some
1973:
but not every lawyer who appears before a particular circuit bench. Prosecutors (generally) appear in the same court every day per their employment, while defense attorneys can appear in federal court one day, bankruptcy court the next and family court the day after that. The association between
1070:
Much to my astonishment, there are colleges outside of the United States where soccer is played. This category effectively serves as a parent of collegiate-level soccer programs in the United States and corresponding categories should be created for other nations where the sport is played at the
600:
I don't know if I lack imagination, but I find it hard to envisage someone being cited in their article for criticizing
Knowledge (XXG) when it wasn't a big deal to them. If it's an op-ed writer who volunteers their opinion on all sorts of issues all over the spectrum and one incident was where
449:
Many of them are so clear in their criticisms that they make no mention of their subjects criticizing
Knowledge (XXG) at all. Many of them mention Wiki-criticism in passing, in a single sentence or phrase. Frankly, many of those that do cover the criticism in detail do so in such an
280:
Not a real "category" - the nature of "criticism" is wholly ambiguous and the category as a whole serves little or no useful purpose to the encyclopaedia. Should be deleted, but at the very least should be subject to proper discussion over the merit of its continued existence
1754:- lawyers are not defined by the locales in which their clients are held. Prisoners can be and are transferred between facilities and lawyers have any number of clients so categorizing lawyers on this basis can lead to any number of clutterful categories on lawyers' articles.
454:
manner that it comes off as masturbatory. There is a substantive difference between a person who makes his or her living as a professional critic and someone who criticizes someone or something in passing. This is just the sort of overcategorization by opinion that
619:"A big deal" also doesn't translate to "defining characteristic". Big deals are made out of all sorts of things, which make them notable but not necessarily defining. People raise ruckuses over lots of stuff that we don't, and shouldn't, categorize.
2010:
And as for the recentism counterargument, I suspect one could create a category for lawyers who defended Nazis at Nuremberg and other such major tribunals, that satisfies guidelines for RS and defining category characteristics.
1857:
1016:
age-group. And note how there has been no start at all of a similar tree for any other country. I suppose an option, however, would be to overhaul the naming of the tree to have it named more formally, to, for instance,
1821:
per nom; a kind of "recentism" pervades here in suggesting that being a lawyer for prisoners at G.B. is any more defining than being an attorney for prisoners in other historical prisons (or for Japanese accused at the
528:
people by opinion, what will we have next? Critics of Obama, Critics of Abortion, Critics of age of consent laws, Critics of Harry Potter movies, Critics of smoking, Critics of critics: just as valid as this junk.
42:
37:
1947:
per JohnZ. In the articles I checked, the attorney's participation figured prominently. I also cannot see the logic of prosecutors meriting categories, but defense attorneys not.
1212:
387:
Category appears to be in keeping with other Critics of... categories. I'm not sure what the nominator means by "the nature of 'criticism' is wholly ambiguous" but we do have a
1892:
1097:. Lets have this page named the same as the others for now and then later if someone wants to rename the lot, splitting the NCAA and NAIA programs, do so at that time
1823:
1427:
The category is defining and matches ones for other nations around the world. What is the source of the systemic bias that assumes that this category will never grow?
1804:
we don't categorize lawyers by who their clients are or where they are kept. Next, we'll have San Quentin attorneys, and SingSing attorneys, Alcatraz attorneys, etc.
426:
the other "Critics of..." categories. I've removed the Knowledge (XXG) category from this master cat, at least for now, others may restore it if they so choose.
1992:
I disagree. The historical importance of these proceedings and the weight given them in biographical articles do reach the level of a defining characteristic.
1203:
147:
I can't even figure out what this is supposed to be. It certainly does not seem to be a valid category. However, I also can't see grounds for speedy deletion.
1089:
There is no need to separate NCAA and NAIA in our categorising, and there is certainly no precedent. This suggestion is fine if the nomination is to rename
21:
1066:
741:
2029:
I doubt that you would find that having done so is particularly defining for those who did. Which is probably why the category has not been created.
1277:
per nom. Seems like a reasonable intermediate step to take until there is a need for these broader categories, if indeed they will ever be needed.
733:
872:
780:
per nom. (Any human or animal can "change their size". It's called overeating. Or are we talking about changes in height here? It is not clear.)
1635:
While there is an article that matches the current title, the description of the category states that the parent is the proposed rename target.
1723:
17:
1017:
724:
252:
1371:
854:
does crouching count? and we won't talk about which character on Star Trek:TNG claims to be "anatomically functional in every way" LOL...
1363:
1208:
1714:
1354:
119:
127:
1199:
467:
of a handful of other categories (which should also be examined) does not mandate or even suggest that this one should be kept.
243:
1966:
1194:
966:
110:
2073:
1895:
makes some sense, but this one not as much since for many defence attorneys a G.B. person is just one client among hundreds.
1190:
1039:
1576:
Oh, my dear. The joke is that on first sight the article seems to be unrelated to the category. Frankly, I'd remove it from
645:
of prior cases are completely unconvincing and arguments based exclusively on the dreaded slippery slope should be ignored.
1731:
2111:
1684:
1660:
1476:
1452:
1321:
1297:
1148:
1124:
924:
900:
694:
670:
216:
192:
74:
2016:
1997:
1952:
1606:
1561:
495:
431:
401:
1239:
shouldn't the BYU one retain the team name "Cougars"? Or do the women's and men's track teams have different names?
837:
as overcategorisation. And you'll get onto trouble with all shapechangers (which per definition should all be here).
2095:
2033:
2020:
2001:
1983:
1956:
1933:
1920:
1899:
1877:
1848:
1830:
1813:
1782:
1763:
1708:
1644:
1627:
1610:
1589:
1565:
1551:
1529:
1525:
1500:
1436:
1419:
1400:
1345:
1281:
1263:
1243:
1230:
1176:
1106:
1080:
1055:
1029:
1006:
987:
952:
884:
863:
846:
825:
811:
784:
770:
718:
654:
628:
610:
591:
573:
556:
538:
520:
499:
476:
435:
405:
376:
355:
337:
320:
300:
260:
237:
174:
156:
102:
962:
1844:
351:
2110:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1659:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1451:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1296:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1123:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
899:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
669:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
388:
191:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1809:
1683:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1512:
1475:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1320:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1147:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1094:
1035:
975:
923:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
859:
693:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
534:
215:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
792:. Ambiguous category. Change in height is part of puberty as well, so that's not defining either. Nice use of
1520:
Many of the articles in this category deal with other aspects of the menstrual cycle than just menstruation.
447:
articles categorized here generally do appear to be quite clear about the nature of their various criticisms.
1795:
1415:
1396:
483:
460:
1577:
1508:
2012:
1993:
1970:
1948:
1602:
1557:
491:
427:
397:
1778:
1704:
1496:
1341:
1043:
761:
Loosely defined. When did Yakko, Wakko or Dot ever change their size? Is inflation (I'm looking at you,
714:
419:
601:
Knowledge (XXG) was involved I could see the issue being moot, but I don't see a big issue of this. __
2059:
1840:
347:
2030:
1930:
1896:
1827:
1805:
1790:-- For almost any other location, I would support the nom, but this is a uniquely notoroius prison
1585:
1547:
1278:
1259:
1240:
1226:
1102:
1051:
1025:
983:
855:
842:
781:
552:
530:
372:
312:
2091:
1979:
1791:
1759:
1640:
1432:
1411:
1392:
1076:
978:
follow this naming pattern; no need to restrict list to colleges/universities with NCAA programs
806:
650:
624:
587:
472:
333:
235:
451:
1884:
1861:
1623:
1538:
316:
170:
152:
2068:
2054:
1916:
1873:
1774:
1700:
1492:
1337:
1002:
710:
516:
415:
291:
464:
456:
1888:
1865:
1581:
1543:
1255:
1222:
1098:
1047:
1021:
979:
880:
838:
606:
569:
548:
368:
2087:
1975:
1755:
1636:
1428:
1072:
875:
since many of the delete votes seem to focus on the current title being ambiguous. __
799:
646:
620:
583:
468:
329:
232:
2063:
547:? That also seems to be a little extreme. What do my fellow editors say about that?
396:
to Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation. If so, we're getting into the realm of censorship.
1619:
166:
148:
2083:
1969:
but not every lawyer who's ever argued before the Supreme Court, or categorizing
1926:
Why one should have categories on prosecutors rather than the defense escapes me.
1912:
1869:
998:
512:
283:
2086:) see the term as defining the group of attorneys representing these clients.
1165:
941:
793:
762:
91:
1864:'s involvement is mentioned in the first sentence of her article, just like
1521:
1410:-- We have categories for many UK ministries, so why not for Peruvian ones?
876:
602:
565:
1677:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1469:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1314:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1141:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
917:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
687:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
209:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2078:
997:– why is it assumed that 'college athletes' are only found in N America?
1858:
Category:Prosecutors of the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg
161:
Did "nonsense" stop being a speedy criterion when I wasn't looking?
511:
This is a valid category. Criteria for inclusion is not ambiguous.
1856:
Per common sense. Being a Guantanamo Bay attorney, like being in
1067:
Category:National Collegiate Athletic Association soccer players
1887:
is essentially a G.B. "judge", not a prosecutor or a defender.
484:
User:Good_Olfactory/CFD#People_by_opinion_or_political_position
873:
Category:Fictional characters who can scale down their size
2104:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1653:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1445:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1290:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1117:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
893:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
663:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
185:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1221:
just athletes listed, not coaches, officials, or others
328:- overcategorization on the basis of opinion or belief.
1965:
For the same reasons that it makes sense to categorize
1739:
1735:
1727:
1719:
1379:
1375:
1367:
1359:
1018:
Category:University soccer players in the United States
749:
745:
737:
729:
725:
Category:Fictional characters who can change their size
680:
Category:Fictional characters who can change their size
268:
264:
256:
248:
135:
131:
123:
115:
1391:
Over-categorisation. Will not be highly populated. --
2058:
had no trouble defining "Veteran Guantánamo attorney
1213:
Category:Michigan Wolverines track and field athletes
2114:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1893:
Category:Guantanamo_Military_Commission_Prosecutors
1687:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1663:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1479:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1455:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1324:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1300:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1209:
Category:Michigan Wolverines track and field people
1151:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1127:). No further edits should be made to this section.
927:). No further edits should be made to this section.
903:). No further edits should be made to this section.
697:). No further edits should be made to this section.
673:). No further edits should be made to this section.
219:). No further edits should be made to this section.
195:). No further edits should be made to this section.
77:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1556:Well, it is so categorized, but what's the joke?
414:Part of the problem, imo, is the master category
1824:International Military Tribunal for the Far East
1355:Category:Peruvian Ministers of the Environment
1307:Category:Peruvian Ministers of the Environment
820:Don't get me started on Pokémon or inflation.
1204:Category:BYU Cougars track and field athletes
8:
1200:Category:BYU Cougars track and field people
2074:"Guantanamo Lawyers Predict More Suicides"
1195:Category:College track and field athletes
111:Category:Hail Eris! read A Drifting brain
60:Category:Hail Eris! read A Drifting brain
18:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion
1618:per nom, & to match main article.
1191:Category:College track and field people
1134:Category:College track and field people
543:Now this is a good point. So we should
545:delete all "Critics of..." categories
7:
244:Category:Critics of Knowledge (XXG)
202:Category:Critics of Knowledge (XXG)
2084:"Guantanamo lawyers demand access"
1891:was a prosecutor, not a defender.
765:) the same as changing your size?
418:, which combines occupations like
28:
1715:Category:Guantanamo Bay attorneys
1694:The result of the discussion was:
1670:Category:Guantanamo Bay attorneys
1486:The result of the discussion was:
1331:The result of the discussion was:
1158:The result of the discussion was:
934:The result of the discussion was:
704:The result of the discussion was:
422:with the nominated category. But
392:may be suggesting that it is not
226:The result of the discussion was:
84:The result of the discussion was:
1601:per nom, to match main article.
486:is a persuasive list: change to
967:Category:College soccer players
824:, his otters and a clue-bat •
769:, his otters and a clue-bat •
1040:Category:American sportspeople
459:contemplates. We have deleted
1:
2049:Strong Keep / Consider Rename
30:
963:Category:NCAA soccer players
910:Category:NCAA soccer players
461:scores of similar categories
389:Criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
2131:
1177:21:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
953:21:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
238:03:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
2096:16:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
2034:03:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
2021:17:25, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
2002:17:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
1984:17:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
1957:05:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
1934:09:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
1921:05:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
1900:00:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
1883:German Nazis at the IMT.
1878:21:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
1849:15:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
1831:06:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
1814:22:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1783:20:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1764:12:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1709:07:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
1645:15:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
1628:17:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
1611:03:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1590:08:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1566:03:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
1552:16:41, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1530:14:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1501:23:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
1437:15:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
1420:00:31, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1401:20:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1346:23:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
1282:21:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1264:10:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1244:02:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1231:21:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1107:16:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
1095:Category:College athletes
1081:15:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
1056:19:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1036:Category:College athletes
1030:10:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
1007:10:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
988:22:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
976:Category:College athletes
885:20:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
864:22:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
847:08:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
826:01:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
812:01:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
785:00:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
771:22:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
719:23:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
655:15:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
629:21:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
611:20:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
592:19:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
574:15:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
557:21:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
539:22:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
521:20:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
500:02:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
477:23:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
436:18:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
406:14:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
377:08:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
356:02:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
338:13:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
321:00:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
301:22:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
175:00:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
157:23:08, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
103:00:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
2107:Please do not modify it.
1680:Please do not modify it.
1656:Please do not modify it.
1513:Category:Menstrual cycle
1472:Please do not modify it.
1448:Please do not modify it.
1317:Please do not modify it.
1293:Please do not modify it.
1144:Please do not modify it.
1120:Please do not modify it.
920:Please do not modify it.
896:Please do not modify it.
690:Please do not modify it.
666:Please do not modify it.
212:Please do not modify it.
188:Please do not modify it.
70:Please do not modify it.
1971:United States Attorneys
1749:Nominator's rationale:
1580:even on second sight.
1518:Nominator's rationale:
1389:Nominator's rationale:
1219:Nominator's rationale:
1034:i changed the link of
972:Nominator's rationale:
759:Nominator's rationale:
278:Nominator's rationale:
145:Nominator's rationale:
1967:US Solicitors General
1798:) 16:34, 19 July 2009
1578:Category:Menstruation
1509:Category:Menstruation
1462:Category:Menstruation
1044:Category:Sportspeople
974:all other subcats of
420:Category:Wine critics
367:Knowledge (XXG). ;-)
2060:Clive Stafford Smith
1868:'s is at Nuremburg.
1065:Keep and Rename to
1093:the subcats under
1071:collegiate level.
2013:Shawn in Montreal
1994:Shawn in Montreal
1949:Shawn in Montreal
1885:Susan J. Crawford
1862:Susan J. Crawford
1603:Shawn in Montreal
1558:Shawn in Montreal
1539:Maya moon goddess
492:Shawn in Montreal
428:Shawn in Montreal
398:Shawn in Montreal
299:
51:
50:
2122:
2109:
2069:Fox News Channel
2066:). Sources from
2055:The Miami Herald
1826:, for example).
1744:
1743:
1682:
1658:
1506:Propose renaming
1474:
1450:
1384:
1383:
1319:
1295:
1254:Oops! Corrected
1184:Propose renaming
1173:
1172:
1169:
1146:
1122:
960:Propose renaming
949:
948:
945:
922:
898:
823:
822:Ten Pound Hammer
809:
802:
796:, by the way. —
768:
767:Ten Pound Hammer
754:
753:
692:
668:
416:Category:Critics
296:
289:
286:
273:
272:
214:
190:
140:
139:
99:
98:
95:
89:as nonsense. --
72:
47:
36:
31:
2130:
2129:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2112:deletion review
2105:
2031:Good Ol’factory
1931:Good Ol’factory
1897:Good Ol’factory
1841:Mercurywoodrose
1828:Good Ol’factory
1717:
1713:
1685:deletion review
1678:
1672:
1667:
1661:deletion review
1654:
1528:
1477:deletion review
1470:
1464:
1459:
1453:deletion review
1446:
1357:
1353:
1322:deletion review
1315:
1309:
1304:
1298:deletion review
1291:
1279:Good Ol’factory
1241:Good Ol’factory
1170:
1167:
1166:
1149:deletion review
1142:
1136:
1131:
1125:deletion review
1118:
946:
943:
942:
925:deletion review
918:
912:
907:
901:deletion review
894:
821:
807:
800:
782:Good Ol’factory
766:
727:
723:
695:deletion review
688:
682:
677:
671:deletion review
664:
363:How can one be
348:Mercurywoodrose
292:
284:
246:
242:
217:deletion review
210:
204:
199:
193:deletion review
186:
113:
109:
96:
93:
92:
75:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2128:
2126:
2117:
2116:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2024:
2023:
2005:
2004:
1987:
1986:
1960:
1959:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1889:Telford Taylor
1866:Telford Taylor
1851:
1833:
1816:
1806:Carlossuarez46
1799:
1785:
1767:
1766:
1746:
1745:
1711:
1690:
1689:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1665:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1633:Support Rename
1630:
1613:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1533:
1532:
1524:
1515:
1503:
1482:
1481:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1457:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1422:
1404:
1403:
1386:
1385:
1348:
1327:
1326:
1310:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1302:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1247:
1246:
1216:
1215:
1206:
1197:
1187:
1186:
1180:
1179:
1154:
1153:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1129:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1084:
1083:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1032:
1010:
1009:
991:
990:
969:
956:
955:
930:
929:
913:
911:
908:
906:
905:
889:
888:
887:
866:
856:Carlossuarez46
849:
831:
830:
829:
828:
815:
814:
787:
774:
773:
756:
755:
721:
700:
699:
683:
681:
678:
676:
675:
659:
658:
657:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
614:
613:
595:
594:
577:
576:
559:
541:
531:Carlossuarez46
523:
505:
504:
503:
502:
480:
479:
441:
440:
439:
438:
380:
379:
358:
340:
323:
304:
303:
275:
274:
240:
222:
221:
205:
203:
200:
198:
197:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
142:
141:
106:
105:
80:
79:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2127:
2115:
2113:
2108:
2102:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2080:
2075:
2071:
2070:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2050:
2047:
2046:
2035:
2032:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1943:
1942:
1935:
1932:
1927:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1901:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1800:
1797:
1793:
1792:Peterkingiron
1789:
1786:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1769:
1768:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1747:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1716:
1712:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1695:
1692:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1681:
1675:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1662:
1657:
1651:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1614:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1597:
1596:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1540:
1535:
1534:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1473:
1467:
1466:
1461:
1456:
1454:
1449:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1412:Peterkingiron
1409:
1406:
1405:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:Alan Liefting
1390:
1387:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1325:
1323:
1318:
1312:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1299:
1294:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1280:
1276:
1273:
1272:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1245:
1242:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1214:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1175:
1174:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1145:
1139:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1126:
1121:
1115:
1114:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
993:
992:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
970:
968:
964:
961:
958:
957:
954:
951:
950:
938:
935:
932:
931:
928:
926:
921:
915:
914:
909:
904:
902:
897:
891:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
867:
865:
861:
857:
853:
850:
848:
844:
840:
836:
833:
832:
827:
819:
818:
817:
816:
813:
810:
805:
804:
803:
795:
791:
788:
786:
783:
779:
776:
775:
772:
764:
760:
757:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
726:
722:
720:
716:
712:
708:
705:
702:
701:
698:
696:
691:
685:
684:
679:
674:
672:
667:
661:
660:
656:
652:
648:
643:
640:
639:
630:
626:
622:
618:
617:
616:
615:
612:
608:
604:
599:
598:
597:
596:
593:
589:
585:
581:
580:
579:
578:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
540:
536:
532:
527:
524:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
506:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
481:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
453:
448:
445:
444:
443:
442:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
390:
386:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
357:
353:
349:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
322:
318:
314:
309:
306:
305:
302:
297:
295:
288:
287:
279:
276:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
241:
239:
236:
234:
230:
227:
224:
223:
220:
218:
213:
207:
206:
201:
196:
194:
189:
183:
182:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:Speedy delete
160:
159:
158:
154:
150:
146:
143:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
108:
107:
104:
101:
100:
88:
87:Speedy Delete
85:
82:
81:
78:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
2106:
2103:
2077:
2067:
2053:
2048:
1944:
1925:
1853:
1835:
1818:
1801:
1787:
1770:
1751:
1748:
1696:
1693:
1679:
1676:
1655:
1652:
1632:
1615:
1598:
1537:
1517:
1505:
1488:
1485:
1471:
1468:
1447:
1444:
1424:
1407:
1388:
1350:
1333:
1330:
1316:
1313:
1292:
1289:
1274:
1236:
1218:
1217:
1183:
1164:
1163:per nom. --
1160:
1157:
1143:
1140:
1119:
1116:
1090:
1064:
1046:at any rate
994:
971:
959:
940:
937:No Consensus
936:
933:
919:
916:
895:
892:
868:
851:
834:
798:
797:
789:
777:
758:
706:
703:
689:
686:
665:
662:
641:
561:
544:
525:
508:
487:
446:
423:
393:
384:
382:
381:
364:
360:
342:
325:
307:
293:
282:
277:
228:
225:
211:
208:
187:
184:
162:
144:
90:
86:
83:
69:
66:
1775:Gloriamarie
1771:Strong Keep
1701:Vegaswikian
1493:Vegaswikian
1338:Vegaswikian
711:Vegaswikian
1161:Rename all
794:Jigglypuff
763:Jigglypuff
452:unbalanced
311:category.
1582:Debresser
1544:Debresser
1256:Mayumashu
1237:Question:
1223:Mayumashu
1099:Mayumashu
1048:Mayumashu
1022:Mayumashu
980:Mayumashu
839:Debresser
549:Debresser
465:existence
369:Debresser
2088:Alansohn
2079:BBC News
2064:see here
1976:Otto4711
1756:Otto4711
1637:Alansohn
1429:Alansohn
1073:Alansohn
647:Alansohn
621:Otto4711
584:Otto4711
469:Otto4711
463:and the
330:Otto4711
233:Andrew c
20: |
1728:history
1620:Johnbod
1542:? :)))
1368:history
835:Deleted
808:xplicit
738:history
394:helpful
365:against
313:Adambro
257:history
167:Bearcat
149:LeSnail
124:history
55:July 19
43:July 20
38:July 18
1913:John Z
1870:John Z
1819:Delete
1802:Delete
1752:Delete
1616:Rename
1599:Rename
1489:Rename
1351:Delete
1275:Rename
999:Occuli
869:Rename
852:Delete
790:Delete
778:Delete
707:Delete
526:Delete
513:Edward
488:delete
361:Delete
326:Delete
2076:) to
1736:watch
1732:links
1536:Like
1376:watch
1372:links
1038:from
1020:etc.
995:Query
939:. --
746:watch
742:links
457:WP:OC
265:watch
261:links
132:watch
128:links
46:: -->
16:<
2092:talk
2017:talk
1998:talk
1980:talk
1953:talk
1945:Keep
1917:talk
1874:talk
1854:Keep
1845:talk
1836:Keep
1810:talk
1796:talk
1788:Keep
1779:talk
1760:talk
1740:logs
1724:talk
1720:edit
1705:talk
1697:Keep
1641:talk
1624:talk
1607:talk
1586:talk
1562:talk
1548:talk
1522:Lyrl
1497:talk
1433:talk
1425:Keep
1416:talk
1408:Keep
1399:) -
1397:talk
1380:logs
1364:talk
1360:edit
1342:talk
1334:Keep
1260:talk
1227:talk
1171:damr
1103:talk
1077:talk
1052:talk
1026:talk
1003:talk
984:talk
947:damr
881:talk
877:meco
860:talk
843:talk
750:logs
734:talk
730:edit
715:talk
651:talk
642:Keep
625:talk
607:talk
603:meco
588:talk
570:talk
566:meco
562:Keep
553:talk
535:talk
517:talk
509:Keep
496:talk
473:talk
432:talk
402:talk
385:Keep
373:talk
352:talk
343:Keep
334:talk
317:talk
308:Keep
269:logs
253:talk
249:edit
229:Keep
171:talk
153:talk
136:logs
120:talk
116:edit
97:damr
35:<
1511:to
1211:to
1202:to
1193:to
1091:all
1042:to
965:to
871:to
424:not
285:DJR
22:Log
2094:)
2062:"
2019:)
2000:)
1982:)
1955:)
1919:)
1876:)
1847:)
1812:)
1781:)
1762:)
1738:|
1734:|
1730:|
1726:|
1722:|
1707:)
1699:.
1643:)
1626:)
1609:)
1588:)
1564:)
1550:)
1499:)
1491:.
1435:)
1418:)
1378:|
1374:|
1370:|
1366:|
1362:|
1344:)
1336:.
1262:)
1229:)
1105:)
1079:)
1054:)
1028:)
1005:)
986:)
883:)
862:)
845:)
748:|
744:|
740:|
736:|
732:|
717:)
709:.
653:)
627:)
609:)
590:)
572:)
555:)
537:)
519:)
498:)
490:.
475:)
434:)
404:)
375:)
354:)
336:)
319:)
267:|
263:|
259:|
255:|
251:|
173:)
165:.
155:)
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
118:|
2090:(
2082:(
2072:(
2015:(
1996:(
1978:(
1951:(
1915:(
1872:(
1843:(
1808:(
1794:(
1777:(
1758:(
1742:)
1718:(
1703:(
1639:(
1622:(
1605:(
1584:(
1560:(
1546:(
1526:C
1495:(
1431:(
1414:(
1395:(
1382:)
1358:(
1340:(
1258:(
1225:(
1168:X
1101:(
1075:(
1050:(
1024:(
1001:(
982:(
944:X
879:(
858:(
841:(
801:ÎŁ
752:)
728:(
713:(
649:(
623:(
605:(
586:(
568:(
551:(
533:(
515:(
494:(
471:(
430:(
400:(
383:*
371:(
350:(
332:(
315:(
298:)
294:T
290:(
271:)
247:(
169:(
151:(
138:)
114:(
94:X
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.