2653:. If I understand rightly, a station is an individual broadcasting location with a call sign, a channel is the frequency at which a station broadcasts or the portion of a cable connection to which a network is assigned, and a network is a group of stations or a cable-only "broadcaster"; there's no real layman's distinction between "channel" and "network" in a cable context, as far as I can tell. That's a good reason, by itself, to have categories for "channels and networks". (But since this is a proposal to merge two metacategories for channels and networks, I don't see how that's a big deal for this discussion.) In this context, "interest" and "content" seem to be synonyms, together with "paradigm", "topic", and "parameter". If a distinction must be made, we should rename something to make things clearer, e.g. "by topic" for the broadcast content itself , "by location" for geography , or "by genre" for technical details . "Interest" and "content" sound completely synonymous, especially as the contents of the two ("Shopping networks", content; and "Television channels and networks about health", interest) are apparently the same. "Content" is for communities of interest, per the hatnote, but how do shopping networks appeal more to a community of interest than do 24-hour news networks?
1457:, but given current conditions, I'd like to see only some. "PEOPLE FROM COUNTRY of NATIONAL ORIGIN descent" categories, e.g. "Americans of Indian descent", ought to be deleted because they're not particularly useful. But as long as those exist, we ought to retain the "PEOPLE FROM COUNTRY belonging to OCCUPATION of NATIONAL ORIGIN descent", e.g. American academics of Chinese descent, because they're natural split-ups of the higher-up categories. If we have categories for people of such-and-such descent, it makes complete sense to split them up by nationality (so as long as we have the parents, we should keep the split-up categories), so the solution is to go after the parent categories first and then go after the split-ups, since it doesn't make sense to retain an ordinary split-up after deleting the things they're split out of. I'd advocate keeping a small number, e.g. Fijian politicians of Indian descent, because ethnicity is a major factor for them. What if you nominated them individually and made a statement of "I withdraw every one that gets any opposition"? If you get consensus to delete most of a big batch of items, this would be an easy route to know which ones to handle separately.
421:). Do you have any idea how this change would impact tens of thousands of categories that would need to be changed? This is not a change that can happen on a single Cfd discussion, it should involve the participation of many more editors that CfD draws and the relevant WikiProjects on ethnicity and occupation should be notified. This would be a major departure from current practice. My casual observation is that most people without a strong ethnic identification believe ethnicity doesn't play a big role in a person's identity and profession while those who do have a strong ethnic identification know how important ethnicity is in how they experience the world and practice what they do. And lumping all Asians together as being similar is just beyond understanding! This is a huge consideration that should be publicized in the Village Pump or other central location.
2533:); "network" = a national broadcasting entity which distributes its content by selling it to the individual stations (e.g. NBC, CTV) instead of directly operating its own viewer-facing service; and "channel" = a national broadcasting entity which directly distributes one common programming service everywhere via cable or satellite (e.g. CNN, Food Network) with few to no localized variances, and thus consists of one standalone broadcast entity rather than dozens or hundreds of interconnected broadcast entities. In actual practice, however, viewers (and sometimes even the networks, stations or channels themselves) don't really observe or uphold that distinction very well at all, and just mix and match all three terms willy-nilly — which is why we have the problem you observe, and why attempts to clean it up tend not to stick in an encyclopedia that
1396:. Keep the ones that are natural junctions of categories, e.g. the American academics of Chinese descent. As long as we have the parent categories (American academics and American people of Chinese descent), it helps to split up the category: we already have 631 articles in American people of Chinese descent, and if we merge all the articles in the subcategories into the parent, we'll have 1,534 articles in the parent; 631 is already too much, and whether we merge some subcategories or all of them, we're only making the problem worse. The solution is not to expand large categories. And perhaps you're unaware, but some of these are more than mere intersections, e.g. Category:Fijian politicians of Indian descent — Indians in Fiji versus the indigenous people in Fiji are a major political issue, e.g. the
1775:
elected nor employed by the local churches, but instead are appointed by the local
Conferences, which assign them responsibility over a single church or group of churches. Ordination is a formal recognition bestowed upon pastors and elders after usually a number of years of service. In most parts of the world, women may not be given the title "ordained", although some are employed in ministry, and may be "commissioned" or "ordained-commissioned". However, beginning in 2012, some unions adopted policies of allowing member conferences to ordain without regard to gender. "
120:. Descent and occupation are a trivial intersection, e.g. the fact that a Canadian journalist has Chinese ancestors says nothing about his/her professional career as a journalist. Note that is not a SMALLCAT nomination. In contrast to the previous nomination, all sibling categories are now nominated as well. Sometimes there is a single upmerge, sometimes a dual upmerge, dependent on whether the articles are already somewhere else in the tree of occupation by nationality.
1189:. 1 category vs 2 categories is a very small difference. But you pointed that the lack of intersections would eventually lead to "10 one-characteristic category tags" and escalations to higher numbers. Per our typical subcategorizations, any of the intersections would replace its parent categories. But in the scenario you described, we could have dozens of categories in an article, because we failed to create a viable subcategory for where they intersect.
811:, for those who edit within the realm of the many wikiprojects about ethnicities, these categorizations are important to us, as these intersections of ethnicity, nationality, and occupation help us categories individuals who are notable within the scope of our project. If the goal is to move all these to WikiData, IMHO these categories would help provide additional categories for WikiData.--
1406:
Indian descent, both because of potential confusion (if an Indian Muslim from Bengal moves to the US in 1946, how do you know whether his descendants are
Americans of Indian descent, Americans of Pakistani descent, or Americans of Bangladeshi descent?) and because it's not particularly defining. But given the fact that this nomination mixes these three kinds of situations, it ought to be
245:
groups economic status. For example, food/groceries/restaurants have been a major theme in such new arrivals in the USA as the
Chinese, Greeks, Italians and Mexicans. Farming and skilled crafts for Germans. Likewise needle trades, clothing and retailing for Jews. Erasing this information is unnecessary and unwise.
2506:
The blurb for the categories seems to say that stations and channels are interchangeable, but networks are different. I think the fundamental problem is that from a technical point of view these three things are distinct, but these distinctions are invisible to the viewers, and to most of the people
1774:
Clergy categories may be a bit different from other
Christian groups. Full ordination is apparently reserved for priests who have already served for several years, and seems to be a seniority rank.: "The ordained clergy of the Adventist church are known as ministers or pastors. Ministers are neither
965:
The distinction between single and dual merging has been made deliberately, dependent on whether or not the articles have already been diffused by some other criterion within the same tree. E.g. politicians are always diffused by political party, sportspeople are always diffused by particular sport.
1035:
If a person has, for example, 10 characteristics (that they can be categorized by) then (simplistically) that person can have 10 one-characteristic category tags, 45 two-characteristic category tags, 120 three-characteristic category tags (if my maths is correct).... See the problem? In fact it's
782:
article is in 5 descent categories (American people of Dutch descent, ... English descent, ... French-Canadian descent, ... Scottish descent, ... Welsh descent) and is categorized for about 6 types of occupation (lawyer, writer, diplomat, politician, academic, activist) and about 40 categories that
367:
impact notability in the same way: anti-African racism does not impact Kenyan-American writers differently than it does
Nigerian-American writers, anti-Asian racism does not impact Chinese-American politicians differently than it does Korean-American politicians, and on and so forth. So things like
939:
No, and further: The intersections are important for research and serves the purpose of categories, which is to assist users to navigate to articles. I also see that the nominations selections are selective, with whole groups being skipped, perhaps reflective of a conscious or un-conscious POV of
1650:
per nom, but articles that are already in one of the clergy (ministers), theologians or missionaries categories should be excluded from the merger. Probably the number of leftover articles which really require merging will be very small. In fact in other denominations a religious leaders category
896:
as nominated. Each of these categories has two parents, an occupation parent and an descent parent. In many cases, this nomination is only going to place the bio articles into the descent parent, meaning that the bio articles will no longer be in an occupation category tree. This nomination is
244:
It does indeed make a difference. In journalism: a reporter's ethnicity provides opportunities for them to cover the group. It gives them contacts, language skills, and familiarity with the subculture. Likewise many ethnic groups specialize in certain occupations and this has been central to the
467:'s Chinese ethnicity was a major factor in the discrimination he faced while holding public office, and that this is not limited to him. So as one can see the intersection of career and Chinese identity is not always irrelevant, in fact it often is relevant and there are citations to back it up.
1405:
of the "Topic of
National Descent" categories, since they're not natural intersections of anything, and I would be fine with deleting the parents of the natural-intersection categories I mention above (together with the child natural-intersection ones I propose keeping), e.g. American people of
856:
In the little editing, and the briefs I have received about WikiData, they would disconnect the intersection as its own category, but maintain it by allowing the different categories to interest based on search terms. That said, as long as categories continue to exist, and they haven't all been
766:
all "descent" categories. The opposers argue that ethnicity/race (of a person) is defining; that may be true, but is irrelevant to this discussion - "descent" categories are about the ethnicity/nationality etc of the persons (sometimes distant) ancesters and hence one person can be in many such
1203:
No - the dozens/hundreds of possible category tags on an article that I was referring to was the result of having categories that intersect many (e.g. 4) characteristics (which could be done in lots of ways). Keeping to 2 (in some cases 3) characteristics per category reduces the potential for
510:
If I understand correctly, you are trying to say that
Chinese Indonesian people are similar to African American people and should therefore be excluded from this nomination (together with all other Southeast Asian categories, presumably). As nominator, that is something that I can well accept.
783:
mention an occupation. Combining descent with occupation could mean the 11 (5+6) to 45 (5+40) descent/occupation category tags are replaced by 30 (5×6) to 200 (5×40) descent+occupation category tags. I'd be interested to know if the oppose/keep !voters think that would be a good thing.
456:'s Taiwanese ancestry had on the public's perception of him during the rise of his basketball career, so I think it is safe to say that the intersection of Chinese ancestry and sports is not trivial. Regarding the other categories being nominated, there are academic sources such as
696:, for example, upmerge Category:American dancers of Indian descent to Category:American dancers and Category:American people of Indian descent. The intersection of descent and occupation is a legitimate subject, but this is just an excessively detailed/fine-grained categorization.
2239:-- I agree with BHG. ENGVAR gives no global preference for the preferred English S-spelling rather than the American Z-spelling. The attempt to impose American English on the (perhaps) 2/3rd of English speakers who are not from North America wreaks of American Imperialism.
263:
Food/groceries/restaurants, farming, skilled crafts, needle trades, clothing and retailing aren't among the occupations that are actually being categorized for here: the occupations being categorized for are things like writing, acting and politics, where individual ethnicity
354:
routinely discuss
African American writers in terms of distinct Kenyan-American and Ghanaian-American and Ugandan-American and Nigerian-American and Senegalese-American and Congolese-American literatures. A person's occupational context may certainly be defined by their
2559:, this is not totally ridiculous as it categorizes by target audience instead of by content (except the shopping which does not belong here). The question however is to what extent the distinction between target audience and type of content is useful enough.
922:
I'm sure the nominator did not intend to remove articles from the occupation category tree. If nomination is amended to explicitely mention a double upmerge, except maybe when a finer occupation category is not already present, would that solve your concern?
1942:. Each is an isolated inconsistency with no ‘by country’ subcats or subcats using ‘organisation’ and renaming will introduce no inconsistencies anywhere. Each contains some American organizations. ‘z’ is permissible except in New Zealand according to
2840:, and one is a character whose standalone notability is not actually being demonstrated by his article at all. Which leaves just three articles that clearly belong here, and that's not enough to earn the show an eponymous category.
2537:
can edit. I'd love it if we could find an umbrella term for all television services, and blow the channel-network-station fuzzification problem out of the category tree completely, but I have yet to figure out a viable alternative.
652:
I wouldn't oppose upmerging to parent categories for both occupation and descent, but has anyone checked if all relevant articles mention these individuals' descents? Categories about diasporas should at least be reliably sourced.
1400:
was an indigenous response to an election in which an Indian had become prime minister, at least partly because the
Fijians feared that the Indians would launch ethnic-based legislation. Finally, I'm fine with deleting
857:
removed for use of some type of WikiData mega categorization collection, these categories should remain, as they are important to those who are editing within topics about ethnicities, as I have stated before.
1276:
Marcocapelle, it does not really matter. The anonymous voter above has never edited any
Knowledge (XXG) article and suddenly appears here to vote. I doubt they know or care about Knowledge (XXG) policies.
603:. Categories not filfulling this criterion should be deleted, with their content upmerged to the nearest eligible category/ies. Also pinging other users involved in past discussions on such intersections:
1146:
Per the argument, instead of having 1 intersection category in the article, the article would end with 10 or more unrelated categories. This would only add to the category clutter instead of reducing it.
105:
2481:
I'd also like to know what people understand by Television networks, Television stations and Television channels. I think that technically they are different, but the categorisation is very confused.
996:, etc are not included under this nomination. For some reason, your nomination's focus is entirely on Asian American occupation subcategories. This unexplained choice leads the impression of a bias.—
2612:
per nom. I agree that there's not a really clear or obvious distinction to make two separate categories useful here — if there is a distinction at all, in fact, I couldn't articulate it if I tried.
1497:
This will affect thousands of articles, all of which will have to be changed, and I doubt the person who created this will be willing to go through those thousands of articles to make the changes.
313:
inclusion of such categories seems to imply that people in various professions are notably different in their skills and abilities by ethnic group; otherwise it's a non-notable intersection per
1514:
ethnicity-occupation intersections are often defining. For example, Einstein is well known as an American scientist of Jewish scientist, and Madame Curie a French scientist of Polish descent. -
714:
42:
37:
1696:
1625:
117:
993:
989:
1036:
much worse than that as even a person with just 2 characteristics could have many two-characteristic category tags because of the combinations of categories at different levels.
2422:
2525:
Strictly speaking, the definition is that "station" = a local entity which transmits over the air, airing a mix of locally produced and networked or syndicated content (e.g.
1612:
This category's description states that it includes theologians, writers, preachers & administrators as well as founders & ministers. This denomination's category in
845:, iirc the folks over at WikiData have said they don't take data from wp categories (e.g. because they want data with references). Do you have any info that WD are doing so?
2456:
489:
2322:
is written to apply to articles, but I think the same principle applies here. What is the benefit of making all of these changes? I am particularly frustrated that
1602:
1178:
445:
588:
350:
typically delve into distinctly Chinese-American or Japanese-American or Korean-American or Vietnamese-American or Thai-American notability contexts, and sources do
2832:. Of the five articles filed here, two are questionable: one is a performance artist who sometimes dresses as the lead character of this series, but is essentially
1480:
I literally just came here from one of the categories that would be affected. I don’t understand how this will help in anyway as you should leave them as they are.
1296:
1239:
346:
can play a role in notability, but individual ethnicity doesn't have the same significance. For example, sources about the Asian American experience in politics do
369:
1670:
1113:
argued that intersections are exponentially increasing the number of categories that an article can be assigned to. Is that something you'd like to encourage?
448:
source covered how many table tennis players in the Olympic games are Chinese even though they represent countries outside of China. And one only has to look
395:
2057:
2053:
2037:
2033:
1916:
1912:
1186:
1674:
21:
2118:
2114:
2046:
2042:
2007:
1925:
1921:
1886:
1678:
1621:
797:
per nomination, except where there is clear proof that such a category is defining, in which case that should be noted on the category talk page. --
463:
for the important role the ethnic Chinese population plays in the economy and politics of Southeast Asian nations. It is also worth mentioning that
441:
1347:
is going to be helpful, especially when Knowledge (XXG) encourages moving articles in such large categories into more appropriate sub-categories.
1260:
Nobody will deny that many articles and categories are involved, but I do not understand how that can serve as an argument in this discussion.
985:
2298:. I would favour renaming all national categories to use "z" too, which would require an RFC. However, these could go ahead if agreed here. –
966:
I am not sure what you mean by stating that the nominations are selective with whole groups being skipped. Which groups are you referring to?
17:
2172:
1617:
2464:
671:
That is beyond the scope of this nomination. If sourcing lacks, the articles shouldn't have been in the nominated categories to begin with.
2460:
2418:
2028:
2024:
1907:
1903:
1719:
and also support the notion that individual articles should be in daughter categories, not the root category. However I'm not so sure that
1613:
1481:
1086:
Yes but you explained the usefullness of intersecting categories. This is the most usefull arguement for keeping that I have read in ages.
359:
status as having Asian or African heritage, given that anti-Asian or anti-African racism has certainly impacted on their careers, but the
568:
He was merely using this as an example...me thinks we should therefore ignore your delete comment as you clearly didn’t understand that.
2109:
2105:
1978:
1974:
1865:
1861:
1243:
600:
569:
201:- I fully support the essence of the nom. I have not checked the upmerges, life being too short, but agree that upmerges are required.
484:
It's going to be difficult, to say the least, to force a single yes/no answer on this entire series of categories. While I agree that
2129:
2125:
2088:
373:
485:
457:
2061:
1435:
I am not sure for which set of these categories you are supporting the nomination. Could you clarify this or give some examples?
1133:
for the math) but (for example) placing a 10-characteristic article in 1 ten-characteristic category would be impractical/silly.
394:
The race vs ethnicity distinction is probably limited to the North American perspective. I don't think the argument can apply to
1242:. There are multiple articles and categories that would be affected by these changes. So it would be ridiculous to change them.
1982:
1869:
693:
2084:
2080:
1666:
1598:
1344:
460:
2003:
1999:
1882:
1878:
1502:
1182:
1164:, I don't understand that (1 intersection category vs 10 unrelated categories). Can you give an example of what you mean?
1019:-- If a triple (or quadruple) intersection can be adequately populated - with 5+ articles, we should allow it to remain.
701:
444:, as there is a lot of coverage on the background of sportspeople who have Chinese ancestry outside of China. For example
2157:
These pointless shufflings between two acceptable variants merely displace inconsistencies rather than resolving them. --
2849:
2824:
2804:
2729:
2662:
2645:
2621:
2604:
2582:
2568:
2547:
2516:
2497:
2476:
2441:
2410:
2343:
2310:
2290:
2270:
2248:
2231:
2210:
2177:
2141:
2100:
2073:
2019:
1994:
1955:
1898:
1851:
1784:
1762:
1736:
1711:
1690:
1660:
1640:
1590:
1523:
1506:
1489:
1466:
1444:
1419:
1384:
1362:
1330:
1316:
1286:
1269:
1251:
1214:
1198:
1170:
1156:
1139:
1122:
1095:
1079:
1061:
1042:
1028:
1005:
975:
949:
932:
906:
882:
851:
833:
803:
789:
773:
758:
705:
680:
662:
644:
577:
561:
538:
520:
501:
476:
432:
407:
389:
330:
299:
287:
277:
254:
232:
210:
190:
167:
129:
97:
2869:
2710:
2682:
2391:
2363:
2191:
The more we can move towards using "organizations" for all categories the happier I will be. Much as I sympathize with
1832:
1804:
1571:
1543:
715:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2018 February 23#Category:American military personnel of Armenian descent
78:
2795:
1397:
878:
829:
2812:
2637:
2302:
1703:
1632:
2218:, assuming that most global organization categories are with a 'z' this will improve consistency. When looking at
2339:
2168:
472:
2630:
2595:
2331:
1485:
697:
610:
529:
Yes, something along those lines. I'd agree with excluding Southeast Asians of Chinese descent from the nom. --
326:
1498:
118:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_October_29#Category:Canadian_journalists_of_Chinese_descent
1247:
573:
2799:
2747:
2244:
1024:
2334:
process for many, many additional categories once editors initially expressed opposition to these changes.
2820:
2564:
2493:
2227:
2219:
1758:
1732:
1656:
1440:
1380:
1326:
1265:
1118:
971:
928:
861:
842:
812:
754:
740:
676:
640:
516:
186:
163:
125:
1307:
that were finally called last week. Anyway, my point is that the categories are useful in/of themselves.
1129:
For accuracy: It's not exponential; the full sequence is 10, 45, 120, 210, 252, 210, 120, 45, 10, 1 (see
2865:
2706:
2678:
2634:
2507:
who wrote the articles. The different terms are certainly used interchangeably in many of the articles.
2387:
2359:
2299:
2261:
was the preferred usage in the UK until 1992 or so and used 'ize'. It is a myth that 'ize' is American.
1828:
1800:
1700:
1629:
1567:
1539:
1304:
596:
417:
Race & ethnicity are a key basis for many categories here on Knowledge (XXG) (and yes, I know about
149:
94:
74:
2738:
2432:"content" and "interest" overlap considerably. Two seperate intermediate categories seems unhelpful.
339:
2488:
I think that channels and networks in Knowledge (XXG) category names are meant to be interchangeable.
2286:, and that's stable since 2008. These should follow that, as they are not country-related categories.
2578:
2512:
2437:
2335:
2206:
2192:
2158:
1686:
1312:
622:
614:
468:
2755:
2726:
2407:
1848:
1587:
557:
322:
321:
that, e.g., scientists of Foo descent do their science differently than those not of that descent?
176:
137:
2833:
592:
418:
317:. First, I find that offensive; but objectively: does anyone have some reliable sources up to the
314:
2240:
1780:
1282:
1194:
1152:
1091:
1057:
1020:
658:
534:
497:
403:
153:
984:
By whole groups being skipped, he probably means that (for example) subcategories belonging to
2864:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2845:
2816:
2677:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2658:
2617:
2560:
2543:
2489:
2452:
2358:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2223:
1799:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1754:
1728:
1652:
1538:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1462:
1436:
1415:
1376:
1322:
1261:
1114:
1001:
967:
924:
917:
750:
672:
636:
512:
385:
295:
273:
250:
182:
159:
121:
2705:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2386:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1827:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1566:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
945:
902:
736:
219:
One doesn't need to look far for an example of the nonsensical clutter that these generate:
1943:
2791:
2574:
2508:
2472:
2433:
2266:
2202:
2137:
2096:
2069:
2015:
1990:
1951:
1937:
1894:
1682:
1519:
1356:
1308:
897:
simply information destructive and unhelpful to WP navigation, the purpose of categories.
779:
732:
724:
228:
206:
2591:
2258:
618:
553:
318:
145:
591:. The par for acceptable intersectional categories of this kind is clearly defined in
552:
I can't think of much relevance to the descent of specific journalists within Canada.
398:; the business and political roles of the Chinese diaspora has been widely covered. --
2287:
1776:
1343:
I'm not sure how up-merging all such articles into one, generic parent category e.g.
1278:
1204:
category clutter. My cmt at the start of this thread was in response to a cmt about "
1190:
1161:
1148:
1104:
1087:
1070:
1053:
654:
630:
530:
493:
399:
2841:
2654:
2613:
2539:
2283:
1458:
1430:
1411:
997:
626:
381:
291:
269:
246:
220:
141:
1210:
1166:
1135:
1110:
1075:
1038:
960:
941:
913:
898:
847:
799:
785:
769:
744:
728:
720:
606:
589:
Category:Left-handed red-hair Buddhist socialist hairdressers from Elko, Nevada
2778:
2468:
2325:
2319:
2262:
2152:
2133:
2092:
2065:
2011:
1986:
1947:
1890:
1727:, which IMHO should be reserved to actual leaders of religious organizations.
1515:
1349:
453:
449:
224:
202:
1375:
sub-categories. Descent and occupation are in most cases entirely unrelated.
338:. These are triple intersections of "people who happen to be X + Y + Z", not
2600:
1300:
2699:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2380:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1821:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1560:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1238:
This will affect so many articles about American politicians for examples
423:
376:
are fine, but there's no encyclopedic value in subdividing them by which
587:. Endless trivial non-defining intersections will result in the like of
2530:
2526:
158:
pinging closer, nominator and contributors to the previous discussion.
2633:
hierarchy dealt with, rather than picking off one medium at a time. –
1410:
encouraged, so we don't keep problematic items or delete good ones.
713:- this relatively recent discussion also ended up in delete/upmerge:
492:
clearly isn't, as the group's activities have been widely studied. --
290:. And you didn't respond to Rjensen's comment regarding journalism.—
2629:: I'm inclined to support the merge, but would rather see the whole
595:: the intersection itself must be a notable field of study, such as
1453:
Sorry about that. I would like to see nearly all of them deleted
380:
Asian or African country the article topics' ancestors came from.
464:
2573:
I dont think the distinction is obvious enough to be helpful.
1295:, and I am a longtime editor. I literally just came here from
1130:
1697:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2018 October 30
1626:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2018 October 30
860:
I don't understand the logic of deleting these categories.--
1321:
The nomination is not about deletion, but about upmerging.
2858:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2671:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2352:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2222:
with its subcats this assumption seems to be reasonable.
1793:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1532:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
994:
Category:American people of Haitian descent by occupation
990:
Category:American people of Mexican descent by occupation
986:
Category:American people of Italian descent by occupation
1181:
would be replaced by 2 categories without intersection:
2763:
2759:
2751:
2743:
1981:– C2C: Global convention above and sideways per parent
1868:– C2C: Global convention above and sideways per parent
2465:
Category:Television channels and networks by parameter
282:
For the record, at least one farming related category
2461:
Category:Television channels and networks by paradigm
2423:
Category:Television channels and networks by content
2419:
Category:Television channels and networks by interest
2373:
Category:Television channels and networks by interest
363:
Asian or African ethnicities they happen to have do
342:
characteristics in their own right. Quite obviously
2872:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2713:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2685:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2394:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2366:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1835:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1807:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1699:re proposed renaming of "clergy" to "ministers". –
1574:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1546:). No further edits should be made to this section.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2457:Category:Television channels and networks by topic
2201:sometimes perfection is the enemy of improvement.
490:Category:Indonesian politicians of Chinese descent
181:pinging other contributor to previous discussion.
2132:– C2C: Per all ancestors, siblings and children.
1208:" (being fine), not about double categorization.
1603:Category:Seventh-day Adventist religious workers
1179:Category:Canadian_journalists_of_Chinese_descent
1297:Category:American politicians of Korean descent
1240:Category:American politicians of Korean descent
1620:, which is currently proposed for renaming to
1299:-- after all, there were recent elections for
488:is probably unwarranted cross-categorisation,
370:Category:American politicians of Asian descent
1753:. That will not change with this nomination.
1671:Category:Seventh-day Adventist administrators
486:Category:American politicians of Thai descent
8:
1934:These global categories were all created by
396:Category:Thai politicians of Chinese descent
2467:. (Separate; think of 'part', not 'pert'.)
2058:Category:Transport organizations by country
2054:Category:Transport organisations by country
2038:Category:Occupational therapy organizations
2034:Category:Occupational therapy organisations
1917:Category:Occupational therapy organizations
1913:Category:Occupational therapy organisations
1187:Category:Canadian people of Chinese descent
1961:
1675:Category:Seventh-day Adventist theologians
1177:Per the nomination, In any given category
2119:Category:Skeptic organizations by country
2115:Category:Skeptic organisations by country
2047:Category:Health informatics organizations
2043:Category:Health informatics organisations
2008:Category:Medical and health organizations
1926:Category:Health informatics organizations
1922:Category:Health informatics organisations
1887:Category:Medical and health organizations
18:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion
1679:Category:Seventh-day Adventist ministers
1622:Category:Seventh-day Adventist ministers
442:Category:Sportspeople of Chinese descent
2590:- And could someone nominate the whole
2006:– C2C: Per convention within and above
1885:– C2C: Per convention within and above
1073:, my !vote was upmerge (i.e. support).
41:
1745:Theologians are a subcat of religious
1667:Category:Seventh-day Adventist leaders
1599:Category:Seventh-day Adventist leaders
1553:Category:Seventh-day Adventist leaders
60:Intersection of descent and occupation
33:
1618:Category:Seventh-day Adventist clergy
1345:Category:American people of X descent
692:to parent categories as suggested in
7:
2029:Category:Physiotherapy organizations
2025:Category:Physiotherapy organisations
1908:Category:Physiotherapy organizations
1904:Category:Physiotherapy organisations
1614:Category:Christian religious leaders
1408:split up with immediate renomination
717:. Pinging contributors for opinion:
2110:Category:Skeptic organization logos
2106:Category:Skeptic organisation logos
1979:Category:Neurosurgery organizations
1975:Category:Neurosurgery organisations
1866:Category:Neurosurgery organizations
1862:Category:Neurosurgery organisations
601:Category:African-American musicians
1206:triple (or quadruple) intersection
288:Category:Japanese-American farmers
28:
2720:The result of the discussion was:
2401:The result of the discussion was:
2130:Category:Paranormal organizations
2126:Category:Paranormal organisations
2089:Category:Philosophy organizations
1842:The result of the discussion was:
1581:The result of the discussion was:
374:Category:African-American writers
268:a strongly defining distinction.
88:The result of the discussion was:
2062:Category:Transport organizations
1983:Category:Surgical organizations
1870:Category:Surgical organizations
2085:Category:Skeptic organizations
2081:Category:Skeptic organisations
1:
2850:20:28, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
2825:21:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
2813:Category:Underdog (TV series)
2805:08:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
2730:22:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
2663:17:36, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
2646:12:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
2622:20:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
2605:22:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
2583:10:17, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
2569:16:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
2548:20:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
2517:10:17, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
2498:16:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
2477:14:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
2442:13:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
2344:00:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
2311:12:52, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
2291:20:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
2271:21:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
2257:There is no such imposition.
2249:18:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
2232:15:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
2211:15:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
2004:Category:Carers organizations
2000:Category:Carers organisations
1956:14:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
1899:14:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
1883:Category:Carers organizations
1879:Category:Carers organisations
1852:00:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
1785:16:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
1763:17:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
1737:15:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
1712:14:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
1691:19:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
1677:are also leaders and finally
1661:17:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
1641:17:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
1591:00:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
1524:01:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
1507:14:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
1490:14:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
1467:23:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
1445:22:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
1420:12:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
1385:21:38, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1363:09:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
1331:21:38, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1317:15:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
1287:18:27, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
1270:09:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
1252:14:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
1215:20:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
1199:18:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
1183:Category:Canadian journalists
1171:18:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
1157:09:34, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
1140:18:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
1123:09:30, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
1096:17:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
1080:17:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
1062:15:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
1043:06:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
1029:17:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
1006:16:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
976:06:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
950:03:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
933:18:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
907:04:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
883:04:44, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
852:19:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
834:01:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
804:23:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
790:17:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
774:18:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
759:17:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
706:16:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
681:17:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
663:16:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
645:15:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
578:14:28, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
562:12:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
539:11:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
521:07:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
502:06:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
477:04:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
433:02:10, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
408:06:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
390:19:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
331:17:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
300:14:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
278:19:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
255:14:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
233:14:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
211:11:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
191:17:21, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
168:17:18, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
130:17:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
98:12:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
30:
2815:to follow the main article.
2411:02:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
2178:12:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
2142:11:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
2101:18:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
2074:23:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
2020:00:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
1995:10:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
1651:could be equally redundant.
1052:Per the articles of DexDor.
1394:Keep for procedural reasons
1109:If I understand correctly,
452:for the deep coverage that
286:get caught up in this nom:
2889:
2631:Category:Works by interest
2596:Category:Works by interest
1371:It encourages creation of
2060:– C2C: Subcat scheme for
1665:There is no need to have
2861:Please do not modify it.
2702:Please do not modify it.
2674:Please do not modify it.
2598:for deletion. please. -
2383:Please do not modify it.
2355:Please do not modify it.
1824:Please do not modify it.
1796:Please do not modify it.
1563:Please do not modify it.
1535:Please do not modify it.
70:Please do not modify it.
1398:2000 Fijian coup d'état
116:: this is follow-up on
104:Full nomination on the
2775:Nominator's rationale:
2455:. There could also be
2430:Nominator's rationale:
2220:Category:Organizations
1610:Nominator's rationale:
843:User:RightCowLeftCoast
2330:continued to use the
1305:Andy Kim (politician)
597:Category:LGBT writers
114:Nominator's rationale
2282:The main article is
1616:is already taken by
2836:in relation to the
2811:If kept, rename to
2777:Too few articles. ―
1669:this is the reason
1499:AmericanPolitics579
698:My very best wishes
611:My very best wishes
2087:– C2C: Per parent
1966:Copy of speedy nom
2739:Category:Underdog
2692:Category:Underdog
2453:user:Stefanomione
2451:- 2 creations of
2187:
2186:
2176:
1725:religious leaders
1681:are also leaders.
802:
741:RightCowLeftCoast
193:
170:
51:
50:
2880:
2863:
2803:
2786:
2768:
2767:
2735:Propose deleting
2704:
2676:
2641:
2594:-ridden tree of
2385:
2357:
2329:
2306:
2198:
2195:
2167:
2164:
2161:
2156:
1962:
1941:
1876:Propose renaming
1859:Propose renaming
1826:
1814:Opposed speedies
1798:
1707:
1636:
1565:
1537:
1434:
1359:
1352:
1108:
964:
921:
874:
871:
868:
865:
825:
822:
819:
816:
798:
748:
634:
469:Inter&anthro
431:
180:
173:
157:
150:Fayenatic london
134:
95:Timrollpickering
72:
47:
36:
31:
2888:
2887:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2870:deletion review
2859:
2789:
2780:
2741:
2737:
2727:Good Ol’factory
2711:deletion review
2700:
2694:
2689:
2683:deletion review
2672:
2639:
2416:Propose merging
2408:Good Ol’factory
2392:deletion review
2381:
2375:
2370:
2364:deletion review
2353:
2336:UnitedStatesian
2323:
2304:
2196:
2193:
2188:
2162:
2159:
2150:
1967:
1935:
1849:Good Ol’factory
1833:deletion review
1822:
1816:
1811:
1805:deletion review
1794:
1705:
1695:Note: see also
1634:
1596:Propose merging
1588:Good Ol’factory
1572:deletion review
1561:
1555:
1550:
1544:deletion review
1533:
1428:
1357:
1350:
1293:oppose deletion
1102:
958:
940:the nominator.
911:
894:strongly oppose
872:
869:
866:
863:
823:
820:
817:
814:
780:Hillary Clinton
718:
623:BrownHairedGirl
615:Johnpacklambert
604:
440:- at least for
422:
174:
135:
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2886:
2884:
2875:
2874:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2827:
2808:
2807:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2716:
2715:
2695:
2693:
2690:
2688:
2687:
2667:
2666:
2665:
2648:
2624:
2607:
2585:
2571:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2501:
2500:
2483:
2482:
2479:
2445:
2444:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2397:
2396:
2376:
2374:
2371:
2369:
2368:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2313:
2293:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2259:Oxford English
2252:
2251:
2234:
2213:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2112:
2077:
2076:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2040:
2031:
1997:
1969:
1968:
1965:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1919:
1910:
1873:
1855:
1854:
1838:
1837:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1809:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1740:
1739:
1714:
1693:
1663:
1644:
1643:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1577:
1576:
1556:
1554:
1551:
1549:
1548:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1509:
1492:
1482:82.132.247.197
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1448:
1447:
1423:
1422:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1366:
1365:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1273:
1272:
1255:
1254:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1065:
1064:
1046:
1045:
1032:
1031:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
979:
978:
953:
952:
937:
936:
935:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
858:
837:
836:
806:
795:Delete/upmerge
792:
776:
764:Upmerge/delete
761:
708:
694:the nomination
686:
685:
684:
683:
666:
665:
647:
581:
580:
565:
564:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
524:
523:
505:
504:
479:
435:
412:
411:
410:
333:
323:Carlossuarez46
319:Sagan standard
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
258:
257:
238:
237:
236:
235:
214:
213:
195:
194:
177:Carlossuarez46
171:
138:Good Olfactory
132:
111:
100:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2885:
2873:
2871:
2867:
2862:
2856:
2855:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2828:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2809:
2806:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2788:
2784:
2776:
2773:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2740:
2736:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2728:
2724:
2721:
2718:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2708:
2703:
2697:
2696:
2691:
2686:
2684:
2680:
2675:
2669:
2668:
2664:
2660:
2656:
2652:
2649:
2647:
2644:
2642:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2625:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2608:
2606:
2603:
2602:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2586:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2555:
2554:
2549:
2545:
2541:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2524:
2523:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2484:
2480:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2447:
2446:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2417:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2409:
2405:
2402:
2399:
2398:
2395:
2393:
2389:
2384:
2378:
2377:
2372:
2367:
2365:
2361:
2356:
2350:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2332:WP:CFD/Speedy
2327:
2321:
2317:
2314:
2312:
2309:
2307:
2301:
2297:
2294:
2292:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2278:
2277:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2241:Peterkingiron
2238:
2235:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2214:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2190:
2189:
2179:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2154:
2148:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2107:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2079:
2078:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2041:
2039:
2035:
2032:
2030:
2026:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1998:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1964:
1963:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1939:
1933:
1932:
1927:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1914:
1911:
1909:
1905:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1877:
1874:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1860:
1857:
1856:
1853:
1850:
1846:
1843:
1840:
1839:
1836:
1834:
1830:
1825:
1819:
1818:
1813:
1808:
1806:
1802:
1797:
1791:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1773:
1770:
1769:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1723:are actually
1722:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1673:are leaders,
1672:
1668:
1664:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1649:
1646:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1597:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1589:
1585:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1569:
1564:
1558:
1557:
1552:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1536:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1432:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1395:
1392:
1391:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1360:
1354:
1353:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1275:
1274:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:82.132.246.65
1241:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1145:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1106:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1021:Peterkingiron
1018:
1015:
1014:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
982:
981:
980:
977:
973:
969:
962:
957:
956:
955:
954:
951:
947:
943:
938:
934:
930:
926:
919:
915:
910:
909:
908:
904:
900:
895:
892:
891:
884:
880:
876:
875:
859:
855:
854:
853:
850:
849:
844:
841:
840:
839:
838:
835:
831:
827:
826:
810:
809:Strong oppose
807:
805:
801:
796:
793:
791:
788:
787:
781:
777:
775:
772:
771:
765:
762:
760:
756:
752:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
716:
712:
709:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
688:
687:
682:
678:
674:
670:
669:
668:
667:
664:
660:
656:
651:
648:
646:
642:
638:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
585:Strong delete
583:
582:
579:
575:
571:
570:82.132.246.65
567:
566:
563:
559:
555:
551:
548:
547:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
526:
525:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
507:
506:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
480:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
434:
430:
428:
427:
420:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
366:
362:
358:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
308:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
252:
248:
243:
240:
239:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
196:
192:
188:
184:
178:
172:
169:
165:
161:
155:
154:Peterkingiron
151:
147:
143:
139:
133:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
112:
110:
109:
107:
101:
99:
96:
92:
89:
86:
85:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
2860:
2857:
2837:
2829:
2817:Marcocapelle
2782:
2774:
2734:
2722:
2719:
2701:
2698:
2673:
2670:
2650:
2638:
2626:
2609:
2599:
2587:
2561:Marcocapelle
2556:
2534:
2490:Marcocapelle
2448:
2429:
2415:
2403:
2400:
2382:
2379:
2354:
2351:
2315:
2303:
2295:
2284:Organization
2279:
2236:
2224:Marcocapelle
2215:
2146:
1875:
1858:
1845:no consensus
1844:
1841:
1823:
1820:
1795:
1792:
1771:
1755:Marcocapelle
1750:
1746:
1729:Place Clichy
1724:
1720:
1716:
1704:
1653:Marcocapelle
1647:
1633:
1609:
1595:
1583:
1580:
1562:
1559:
1534:
1531:
1511:
1494:
1477:
1454:
1437:Marcocapelle
1407:
1402:
1393:
1377:Marcocapelle
1372:
1348:
1323:Marcocapelle
1292:
1262:Marcocapelle
1235:
1209:
1205:
1165:
1134:
1115:Marcocapelle
1074:
1049:
1037:
1016:
968:Marcocapelle
925:Place Clichy
918:Marcocapelle
893:
862:
846:
813:
808:
794:
784:
768:
767:categories.
763:
751:Place Clichy
710:
689:
673:Marcocapelle
649:
637:Place Clichy
584:
549:
513:Marcocapelle
481:
437:
425:
424:
414:
377:
364:
360:
356:
351:
347:
343:
335:
310:
283:
265:
241:
221:Maxine Bahns
198:
183:Marcocapelle
160:Marcocapelle
122:Marcocapelle
113:
103:
102:
91:No consensus
90:
87:
69:
66:
1721:theologians
1111:User:DexDor
737:FieldMarine
340:WP:DEFINING
55:November 11
43:November 12
38:November 10
2575:Rathfelder
2509:Rathfelder
2434:Rathfelder
2320:MOS:RETAIN
2316:Oppose all
2203:Rathfelder
2147:Oppose all
1938:Rathfelder
1683:Catfurball
1455:eventually
733:Necrothesp
725:Creuzbourg
454:Jeremy Lin
378:individual
361:individual
2866:talk page
2834:WP:TRIVIA
2707:talk page
2679:talk page
2635:Fayenatic
2388:talk page
2360:talk page
2318:. I know
2300:Fayenatic
1829:talk page
1801:talk page
1701:Fayenatic
1630:Fayenatic
1568:talk page
1540:talk page
1301:Young Kim
619:Cplakidas
593:WP:OCEGRS
554:Simonm223
419:WP:CATGRS
315:WP:CATGRS
146:Simonm223
106:talk page
75:talk page
2868:or in a
2779:Justin (
2709:or in a
2681:or in a
2390:or in a
2362:or in a
2288:Armbrust
2173:contribs
1831:or in a
1803:or in a
1777:Dimadick
1570:or in a
1542:or in a
1279:Dimadick
1191:Dimadick
1162:Dimadick
1149:Dimadick
1105:Dimadick
1088:Dimadick
1071:Dimadick
1054:Dimadick
655:Dimadick
631:Dimadick
531:Paul_012
494:Paul_012
482:Comment:
400:Paul_012
77:or in a
20: |
2842:Bearcat
2752:history
2655:Nyttend
2627:Comment
2614:Bearcat
2557:Neutral
2540:Bearcat
2535:anybody
2531:CFTO-TV
2527:WPIX-TV
2296:Support
2280:Support
2216:Support
1772:Comment
1751:leaders
1747:workers
1717:Support
1648:Support
1459:Nyttend
1431:Nyttend
1412:Nyttend
1373:related
1291:I also
998:Myasuda
743:, and
711:Comment
690:Upmerge
650:Comment
629:, and
627:Mondiad
382:Bearcat
292:Myasuda
270:Bearcat
247:Rjensen
199:Support
152:, and
142:Bearcat
2830:Delete
2723:delete
2588:Delete
2197:Haired
2169:(talk)
2163:Haired
1944:WP:ISE
1749:, not
1512:Oppose
1495:Oppose
1478:Oppose
1236:Oppose
1211:DexDor
1167:DexDor
1136:DexDor
1076:DexDor
1050:Oppose
1039:DexDor
1017:Oppose
961:Hmains
942:Hmains
914:Hmains
899:Hmains
848:DexDor
800:ELEKHH
786:DexDor
770:DexDor
745:DexDor
729:Hmains
721:Namiba
607:Elekhh
550:Delete
438:Oppose
415:Oppose
336:Delete
311:Delete
242:Oppose
2760:watch
2756:links
2651:Merge
2643:ondon
2610:Merge
2592:WP:OR
2469:Oculi
2449:Merge
2404:merge
2326:Oculi
2308:ondon
2263:Oculi
2194:Brown
2160:Brown
2153:Oculi
2134:Oculi
2093:Oculi
2066:Oculi
2012:Oculi
1987:Oculi
1948:Oculi
1891:Oculi
1709:ondon
1638:ondon
1584:merge
1516:Zanhe
1351:Mar4d
873:Coast
864:Right
824:Coast
815:Right
357:broad
266:isn't
225:Oculi
203:Oculi
46:: -->
16:<
2846:talk
2838:show
2821:talk
2764:logs
2748:talk
2744:edit
2659:talk
2618:talk
2601:jc37
2579:talk
2565:talk
2544:talk
2513:talk
2494:talk
2473:talk
2463:and
2438:talk
2340:talk
2267:talk
2245:talk
2237:Keep
2228:talk
2207:talk
2199:Girl
2165:Girl
2138:talk
2097:talk
2070:talk
2016:talk
1991:talk
1952:talk
1895:talk
1781:talk
1759:talk
1733:talk
1687:talk
1657:talk
1628:. –
1520:talk
1503:talk
1486:talk
1463:talk
1441:talk
1416:talk
1403:most
1381:talk
1358:talk
1327:talk
1313:talk
1309:Mang
1303:and
1283:talk
1266:talk
1248:talk
1195:talk
1185:and
1153:talk
1119:talk
1092:talk
1058:talk
1025:talk
1002:talk
972:talk
946:talk
929:talk
916:and
903:talk
870:Left
821:Left
778:The
755:talk
702:talk
677:talk
659:talk
641:talk
574:talk
558:talk
535:talk
517:talk
498:talk
473:talk
465:Ahok
450:here
446:this
404:talk
386:talk
372:and
344:race
327:talk
296:talk
274:talk
251:talk
229:talk
207:talk
187:talk
164:talk
126:talk
35:<
2421:to
2171:• (
2128:to
2117:to
2108:to
2083:to
2056:to
2045:to
2036:to
2027:to
2002:to
1977:to
1946:.
1924:to
1915:to
1906:to
1881:to
1864:to
1624:at
1601:to
1131:nCr
879:Moo
867:Cow
830:Moo
818:Cow
599:or
365:not
352:not
348:not
284:did
22:Log
2848:)
2823:)
2785:vf
2781:ko
2762:|
2758:|
2754:|
2750:|
2746:|
2725:.
2661:)
2620:)
2581:)
2567:)
2546:)
2529:,
2515:)
2496:)
2475:)
2459:,
2440:)
2406:.
2342:)
2269:)
2247:)
2230:)
2209:)
2149:.
2140:)
2099:)
2091:.
2072:)
2064:.
2018:)
2010:.
1993:)
1985:.
1954:)
1897:)
1889:.
1847:.
1783:)
1761:)
1735:)
1689:)
1659:)
1586:.
1522:)
1505:)
1488:)
1465:)
1443:)
1418:)
1383:)
1361:)
1329:)
1315:)
1285:)
1268:)
1250:)
1197:)
1155:)
1121:)
1094:)
1060:)
1027:)
1004:)
992:,
988:,
974:)
948:)
931:)
905:)
881:)
832:)
757:)
749:.
739:,
735:,
731:,
727:,
723:,
704:)
679:)
661:)
643:)
635:.
625:,
621:,
617:,
613:,
609:,
576:)
560:)
537:)
519:)
500:)
475:)
429:iz
406:)
388:)
329:)
298:)
276:)
253:)
231:)
223:.
209:)
189:)
166:)
148:,
144:,
140:,
128:)
93:.
2844:(
2819:(
2802:☯
2800:M
2798:☺
2796:C
2794:☮
2792:T
2790:❤
2787:)
2783:a
2766:)
2742:(
2657:(
2640:L
2616:(
2577:(
2563:(
2542:(
2511:(
2492:(
2471:(
2436:(
2338:(
2328::
2324:@
2305:L
2265:(
2243:(
2226:(
2205:(
2175:)
2155::
2151:@
2136:(
2095:(
2068:(
2014:(
1989:(
1950:(
1940::
1936:@
1893:(
1872:.
1779:(
1757:(
1731:(
1706:L
1685:(
1655:(
1635:L
1518:(
1501:(
1484:(
1461:(
1439:(
1433::
1429:@
1414:(
1379:(
1355:(
1325:(
1311:(
1281:(
1264:(
1246:(
1193:(
1151:(
1117:(
1107::
1103:@
1090:(
1056:(
1023:(
1000:(
970:(
963::
959:@
944:(
927:(
920::
912:@
901:(
877:(
828:(
753:(
747::
719:@
700:(
675:(
657:(
639:(
633::
605:@
572:(
556:(
533:(
515:(
496:(
471:(
461:2
458:1
426:L
402:(
384:(
325:(
294:(
272:(
249:(
227:(
205:(
185:(
179::
175:@
162:(
156::
136:@
124:(
108:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.