2393:
actually use these for collaboration in that it dilutes the category with users who may not have an interest in actual collaboration. In other words, we shouldn't care if you fix disambiguation links per se, but rather we care if you are willing to collaborate in areas associated with broken disambiguation links should the need arise. A rename to something better reflecting that would be good enough, but that has potential to introduce miscategorization for the reasons already mentioned, although it would be a better step than keeping as-is. I still think deletion is a cleaner option with simultaneous creation for a category name that better reflects the collaborative nature of the participants, but a rename to something would be reasonable as well. Additionally, and perhaps more importantly, it sounds like this category is essentially for participants of
1516:. I agree we need categories for BBC journalists associated with other UK parties, although there don't appear to be as many examples (and in the case of some parties there will possibly be no entries at all and so no category). As for NARROWCAT, that states "intersection categories should only be created when both parent categories are very large and similar intersections can be made for related categories". Clearly as "the world's oldest national broadcasting organisation and the largest broadcaster in the world by number of employees" the number of notable BBC journalists is very large, and similarly both the Labour and Conservative Parties have largely dominated UK politics and are also very well established and thus we have huge numbers of notable people associated with them too.--
1581:
significant names from 50-60 years ago and I haven't gone back that far yet. I'm currently looking into possible categories for other parties, I haven't found enough for the Lib Dems yet and nothing at all for UKIP, though surprisingly for a party that's only had sucess quite recently there's already enough for a SNP category. And yes I am the creator of this category too, though I never received a notification about this discussion which I have to say is rather disappointing and a fairly fundamental part of the process. Seeing as we've mentioned the
Australian versions I'll notify the creator of those of this discussion so they can provide their input and aren't at risk of being left out too.--
1643:
see their very membership of a party as a source of controversy and often a reason for contesting their appointment, thus again making it defining. In particular, there have been cases where party membership has continued despite the individual being appointed to a senior BBC role and in some cases they've been forced to cease their membership once this fact has emerged. I guess you may have a point in that party membership isn't automatically defining, but those would typically be the cases where we can't even source said membership becasue it hasn't been considered notable enough for coverage --
1890:-- I am troubled by this category (and the equivalent Tory one). The BBC is required by its charter to be impartial. This means that this feels like an ATTACK category, implying that the journalists are departing from that impartiality, while at BBC. Inevitably some journalists will be at some stage of their career involved with one party or the other. Equally inevitably, they will reflect their political beliefs in their journalism. A few of the people in this category are not journalists (or at least not primarily so), hence begin with a
2416:
some capacity other than actually fixing links (maybe just being involved in policy discussions on the project side). Comparing these lists, there are 611 editors unique to the fixer category, 159 unique to the WikiProject category, and 39 in both. I actually didn't realize that I wasn't in the second, and just added myself now. Since membership in these categories is self-selected, I would prefer to poll the members to see what their preference is, but that would require asking 770 people, which might be a mess.
809:-- and as so often happens, the usage note on the page is not actually controlling the problem. So the category should have a disambiguator added to it for extra clarity, but I don't know what the best choice would be. Note: due to the ambiguity, I would request that the old category be retained as a "category disambiguation" page rather than a straight redirect to the new category.
146:
only in the sense of not restricting their performance rosters exclusively to local musicians. Most music festivals that exist at all invite "international" musicians, so the diversity of performer nationalities is not a defining characteristic of a festival -- so this should be renamed to make its intended purpose clearer. I've already purged it of inappropriate entries.
1484:
academically, in that undue influence of political parties in such broadcasters has been notable at times throughout history and that's a major issue seeing as these broadcasters typically take public funds in exchange for a legal obligation to be completely impartial (and in the case of the BBC they are even able to imprison people for non-payment).--
602:. I would appreciate it if others could assist in nominating the 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th centuries. It's too tedious to do it all by myself. It's just about tenable that by the 16th century that sufficient counts exist to justify "by year" twigs. Personally I think that "by decade" is perfectly adequate for the whole tree.
1447:. There are no comparable categories for BBC journalists associated with other organisations, nor would they be useful if there were. Given the very specific scope of the category it also seems possible that this is a category created to make a political point, rather than to identify a useful categorisation.
1508:
criticises some categories of this type for either leaving the criteria unstated or being arbitrary. Neither concern applies in this case whatsoever, the category clearly states "This category lists BBC journalists who have worked for or been members of the Labour Party (UK)". Furthermore, we already
2415:
I'm ambivalent about a merge. The current structure contains WikiProject members as a subcategory of all disambiguation-fixers, which I think is an appropriate subcategorization. In theory, someone can be a dab fixer without being a member of the WikiProject, or can be involved in the WikiProject in
1642:
If the journalists have worked for the parties in question, which is the case in 80-90% of the entries, then that is indeed defining. Similarly, if they've engaged in significant party-political activism that's had coverage in reliable sources then that can be defining too. Finally, in some cases we
145:
internationally, such as touring festivals or events that move around from country to country every year rather than staying in one place -- but just like international film festivals, it's also been significantly misused to overcategorize festivals that are held in one place and are "international"
2339:
I am concerned that you may be seriously underestimating the potential complexity of disambiguation problems. I invite you to actually do some work with the project for a while, to learn more about this. Here are some examples of things that might come up, for which this category provides a useful
629:, that seems pretty confusing, especially for the closing administrator of the other discussion. And by the way 2, I'm not sure which banner editor is being referred to in the rationale of this nomination, the first few category creators that I checked are still active. Not that it really matters.
2392:
A category to group users for those reasons does indeed seem like it could foster collaboration. My problem I suppose then comes from the literal interpretation of the category name - Some users merely see which categories apply to them looking no further than the title. This harms the ability to
2319:
It's very condescending of you to assume that I'm missing some sort of rationale for the existence of this category. I've been dealing with user categories for over a decade on
Knowledge (XXG) and there's nothing special about this category or the rationale as to why it should be kept or deleted
2344:
disambiguation links that need to be fixed (the most I have ever seen from such a move was about 18,000). In that case, as many disambiguators as can be found may be needed, particularly if the incoming links are diverse, as happens when the previous article has been split into multiple topics.
2343:
An editor decides to move an existing page with incoming links to create a disambiguation page at that title. Maybe this is a poorly thought out undiscussed move, and should be reverted. Maybe this is pursuant to community consensus. Either way, suddenly you have hundreds or thousands of new
1580:
Yes, I've created that today to address the concerns about the lack of balance as stated above. I haven't been able to find too many entries for
Conservatives yet, but they are mostly all reasonably high profile names and so already make a worthwhile category. Also, I'm sure there are some
1483:
The only examples of these categories on
Knowledge (XXG) concern state-type broadcasters. Thus we're not creating "journalists from X organisation associated with Y political party", simply journalists from X state broadcaster associated with Y political party. This is far more significant
2324:
to seek out a user in that category? Other than the obvious "I think something should be fixed on this disambiguation page" which I already pointed out would be far faster to just fix yourself than to go seek out a user from this category (unless you are disagreeing with that premise?).
2320:
from any number of other similar categories. Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how you feel it benefits
Knowledge (XXG) to group users into this user category then? Why might someone say to themselves "Hey, I think ______ needs to be done. I'm going to go head over to
1620:, not total non-committal refusal to actually have any opinions at all, so if a journalist (whether affiliated with the Conservatives or Labour or the Greens or whatever) is unprofessional enough to let bias show in their reporting, that's on them as an individual,
1174:
it's a new category and as legitimate as "Wikipedians who drink tea" "Wikipedians who own pets" "Wikipedians who are parents" none of these really aid collaboration. As it's a new category, not many people use it as of yet, but should do so after it's discovered at
1824:
The category header says "journalists who have worked for or been members of the Labour Party (UK)". But is it really defining that someone once had a data-entry job with the party? Or that they were briefly an inactive member as a student a few decades
2281:- I do not see how it is useful to group users in this category. You could fix a disambiguation page yourself in less time than it would take to look through this category and request from someone in the category to fix something you found a mistake on.
1465:
per nom. Seems a trivial intersection (most don't mention one or both "facts" in the lead of the article) and I don't think starting a category scheme of journalists from X organisation associated with Y policitial party is a very good idea.
597:
becomes redundant. As for the mergers, there are just not enough entries to justify their existence. They are just twigs created by an over-zealous editor who is now banned. This is just a sample, a toe in the water. The list can be found
1697:? The Labour Party may employ one or 2 reporters for its party newsletter, but AFAICS none of the categ's current contents are in that group. Other than those rare cases, UK political parties don't employ people to work as journalists. --
2243:. Individual experiences may vary, but I think that the editors who participate in this project tend to do more than just repair links, since sometimes a fix to the disambiguation page itself is required to resolve a family of errors.
804:
Ambiguous name. This category is intended for people who support the establishment of small-r republican government in a monarchy, but we end up having to constantly monitor it for the incorrect addition of people who really belong in
2354:
An editor comes across any of the several hundred "unfixable" disambiguation links, for which substantial additional research would be required to figure out the correct answer, and would like a more seasoned hand to take a shot at
2350:
An editor can not find the link reported to be in the text of the page. Maybe it is being called there by a template, or a module being called by a template, or from a
Wikidata entry. An expert would know how to check for these
664:
misinterpretation of smallcat as these form part of a larger series of establishments by country and by year. The very earliest members may merit merging to decade level but the later years should be kept at the year level.
2215:
This started as a nomination to remove the word "help", which is unnecessary in this context. However, the proposed name is more precise and consistent with the language used by the userbox that populates this category:
2358:
An editor decides to sponsor a one-day disambiguation fixing contest with a prize to be awarded by the
Wikimedia Foundation, and would like to reach out to self-identified disambiguators to inform them of this
2364:
These are some major possibilities which would make the category useful. Of course, there is also the possible interest of disambiguators in being so categorized, which is itself a good reason to maintain it.
1194:
2321:
2201:
1932:
We do not do the overlap of occupation, employer and political affiliation. We do not categorize by every possible way to think of matching things, even if some of them could at times be somewhat noted.
626:
599:
1210:
2498:
2471:
2264:
2168:
1786:
That is a fair comment, after all it may be better to delete the nominated category and start a new Labour party spin doctors category from scratch (if there is sufficient content for it).
922:
757:
42:
37:
1202:
577:
561:
545:
529:
513:
497:
481:
465:
449:
2217:
625:, decades are much more appropriate than years and I can assist with next centuries. But by the way 1, I don't quite understand why the list of this nomination has been added
2347:
An editor is alerted that a page they have created contains dozens and dozens of disambiguation links on the page, and does not even know where to start to fix that many.
2239:
Holy crap, I created that category? I entirely forgot about that! I would be fine with removing "help" as unnecessary, but the category name tracks the project name,
127:
684:"The very earliest members" - there are only 10 of the very earliest years nominated out of 9 centuries. Does this mean that you really support the nomination?
1417:
1269:. Does not aid collaboration, and all of NadirAli's "similar" examples are already deleted (thus undermining the very argument they were attempting to make!)
2401:
already exists. Do you think that there is anything worthwhile distinguishing in this category vis a vis the
Wikiproject category? Would you oppose a merge?
1510:
2240:
1860:
1556:
1534:
1380:
1513:
1409:
997:
21:
1564:
1400:
2205:
594:
277:
234:
228:
2394:
242:
238:
433:
417:
401:
385:
369:
353:
337:
321:
305:
289:
17:
2183:
2016:
1875:
1776:
1709:
1084:
937:
772:
259:
138:
105:
806:
573:
557:
541:
525:
509:
493:
477:
461:
445:
1304:- While I don't doubt the category was created in good faith, it's a prime example of a trivial user category that should not exist, per
2397:. If this is the case, we have a huge grouping of Wikiproject member categories in that category tree. In this case it would seem that
1668:
journalists, this may apply to all journalists. Second, 'associated with' is too vague, but 'worked for' may be fine. So turn this into
1120:
1112:
978:
1103:
2515:
2398:
2296:
955:
846:
1669:
123:
581:
565:
549:
533:
517:
501:
485:
469:
453:
429:
413:
397:
381:
365:
349:
333:
317:
301:
285:
959:
828:
1190:
2527:
2489:
2462:
2431:
2410:
2380:
2334:
2314:
2290:
2271:
2258:
2232:
2188:
2152:
2124:
2104:
2087:
2068:
2021:
1989:
1961:
1941:
1924:
1907:
1880:
1795:
1781:
1732:
1714:
1681:
1652:
1633:
1590:
1575:
1546:
1525:
1493:
1474:
1455:
1387:
1364:
1336:
1316:
1305:
1296:
1278:
1259:
1237:
1184:
1166:
1148:
1089:
1057:
1029:
1009:
986:
942:
906:
878:
858:
840:
818:
777:
741:
713:
693:
674:
654:
638:
611:
264:
203:
175:
155:
110:
78:
2038:
2034:
2179:
2012:
1937:
1871:
1772:
1705:
1206:
1198:
1080:
933:
768:
255:
101:
1189:
I find it a bit ironic that you cite multiple categories that have been deleted as a rationale to keep this.
1903:
1648:
1586:
1521:
1489:
836:
689:
650:
607:
437:
421:
405:
389:
373:
357:
341:
325:
309:
293:
1309:
1224:
2083:
1791:
1728:
1677:
1608:
by what political party they happen to be associated with on their own time and dime. I'll grant that the
1005:
982:
854:
634:
1440:
2523:
2148:
2120:
2059:
1985:
1957:
1360:
1332:
1287:
1053:
1025:
902:
874:
737:
709:
199:
171:
74:
1835:
The inclusion criteria for these "associated with X" categories are usually left unstated, which fails
1816:
1605:
622:
2172:
2005:
1933:
1864:
1765:
1698:
1542:
1073:
926:
790:
761:
248:
94:
1829:
1812:
1505:
1444:
2450:
1572:
1452:
1163:
2518:
is not complete. There's a difference between discussing policy and implementing existing policy.
2406:
2330:
2286:
2100:
1920:
1899:
1851:
1644:
1582:
1560:
1517:
1485:
1255:
1233:
1180:
832:
685:
646:
603:
221:
2049:
1856:
794:
1819:. Former MPs, definitely; former senior party officials too. But then there is huge grey area.
2268:
2229:
2119:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2079:
2065:
1956:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1787:
1753:
1739:
1724:
1688:
1673:
1672:
with a hat note that this is about having been occupied as a journalist for the Labour Party.
1629:
1384:
1331:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1313:
1274:
1024:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1001:
873:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
850:
814:
708:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
630:
170:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
151:
2147:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1984:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1383:, which was created (in good faith) during this discussion but suffers the same problems. --
1359:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1052:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
923:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2018 February 6#Category:Rapid_transit_in_Chile
901:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
736:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
198:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2519:
2484:
2426:
2375:
2309:
2253:
1744:
Billington is one of several journalists who have been employed by UK Lab as media advisors/
1720:
1616:
follow from happening to have any political affiliation — "objectivity" in journalism means
2053:
2458:
1538:
1509:
have categories like this for state broadcasters in other countries, such as
Australia:
2449:
to 'fix'. One certainly does not wish to be found on the wrong side of, or sitting on,
1568:
1448:
1159:
670:
247:
A new nomination which actually did what was claimed might have a different outcome. --
1723:
for whom this is clearly defining. Note that I haven't checked how often this occurs.
1624:
an indictment of the entire concept of journalists happening to have political views.
2402:
2326:
2282:
2096:
1916:
1915:
category. It is relevant background information on individuals in the public sphere.
1828:
Attempts to define more precise criteria all into an inescapable trap, described in
1251:
1245:
1229:
1176:
974:
970:
1757:
1625:
1468:
1270:
810:
147:
2295:
This argument almost exactly embodies the principle of being on the wrong side of
758:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2018 February 6#Category:Republicans
2475:
2417:
2387:
2366:
2300:
2244:
2223:
1749:
1745:
2454:
2048:
Same scope, the title should use the plural "FAQs". This may be eligible for
996:, this is part of a larger tree. Articles which don't fit should be moved to
1815:. Clearly, there are some journalists for whom a connection with a party is
1143:
666:
2141:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1978:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1353:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1046:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
895:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
730:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
192:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1612:
exists of partisan bias seeping into their reporting, but that doesn't
1511:
Category:ABC_journalists_associated_with_the_Liberal_Party_of_Australia
1861:
Category:BBC journalists associated with the
Conservative Party (UK)
1557:
Category:BBC journalists associated with the Conservative Party (UK)
1535:
Category:BBC journalists associated with the Conservative Party (UK)
1381:
Category:BBC journalists associated with the Conservative Party (UK)
1514:
Category:ABC journalists associated with the Australian Labor Party
2322:
Category:Wikipedians who help fix disambiguation pages with links
2202:
Category:Wikipedians who help fix disambiguation pages with links
2134:
Category:Wikipedians who help fix disambiguation pages with links
1565:
Category:BBC journalists associated with the Labour Party (UK)
1401:
Category:BBC journalists associated with the Labour Party (UK)
1346:
Category:BBC journalists associated with the Labour Party (UK)
2206:
Category:Wikipedians who repair links to disambiguation pages
2499:
Category:Wikipedians who fix disambiguation pages with links
2472:
Category:Wikipedians who fix disambiguation pages with links
2265:
Category:Wikipedians who fix disambiguation pages with links
2169:
Category:Wikipedians who fix disambiguation pages with links
243:
Category:Years of the 11th century in the Holy Roman Empire
239:
Category:Years of the 10th century in the Holy Roman Empire
1559:
was created and populated since this CfD nom was made, by
2113:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1950:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1325:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1018:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
867:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
702:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
164:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1898:
to BBC journalists and Labour Party (UK) journalists.
1848:
This categ is no exception, and should be deleted. And
1425:
1421:
1413:
1405:
1128:
1124:
1116:
1108:
593:
If the merge proposals above go ahead, then the parent
245:
etc, none of which would be removed by this nomination.
227:
if the merge proposals above go ahead, then the parent
1839:; but applying some threshold of association may fail
1555:
Indeed it should. Worth also noting that the category
1223:
delete all of the examples cited above as well in the
578:
Category:990s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
562:
Category:990s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
546:
Category:980s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
530:
Category:980s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
514:
Category:970s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
498:
Category:970s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
482:
Category:960s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
466:
Category:960s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
450:
Category:960s establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
574:
Category:999 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
558:
Category:997 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
542:
Category:982 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
526:
Category:980 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
510:
Category:976 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
494:
Category:973 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
478:
Category:968 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
462:
Category:965 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
446:
Category:962 establishments in the Holy Roman Empire
2155:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2127:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1992:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1964:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1367:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1339:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1060:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1032:). No further edits should be made to this section.
909:). No further edits should be made to this section.
881:). No further edits should be made to this section.
744:). No further edits should be made to this section.
716:). No further edits should be made to this section.
206:). No further edits should be made to this section.
178:). No further edits should be made to this section.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2218:This user repairs links to disambiguation pages.
2241:Knowledge (XXG):Disambiguation pages with links
1664:. First of all, there is no need to single out
1537:which should be considered with this category.
1250:s examples have already been deleted long ago.
128:Category:Music festivals staged internationally
2267:would be fine, too, in my opinion. Thanks, --
1695:occupied as a journalist for the Labour Party
8:
1104:Category:Wikipedians who consume almond milk
1039:Category:Wikipedians who consume almond milk
2516:Category:WikiProject Disambiguation members
2399:Category:WikiProject Disambiguation members
1760:. But note that their role with Labour was
1439:Category is overcategorised, falling under
998:Category:Passenger rail transport in Chile
141:, this was intended for festivals that are
2395:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Disambiguation
1863:while this categ is under discussion. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion
1158:: not a useful or meaningful category.
847:Category:Republicans (anti-monarchists)
595:Category:Years in the Holy Roman Empire
278:Category:Years in the Holy Roman Empire
235:Category:Years in the Holy Roman Empire
229:Category:Years in the Holy Roman Empire
41:
2078:, the categories have the same scope.
1694:
1670:Category:Labour Party (UK) journalists
434:Category:990s in the Holy Roman Empire
418:Category:990s in the Holy Roman Empire
402:Category:980s in the Holy Roman Empire
386:Category:970s in the Holy Roman Empire
370:Category:970s in the Holy Roman Empire
354:Category:970s in the Holy Roman Empire
338:Category:970s in the Holy Roman Empire
322:Category:960s in the Holy Roman Empire
306:Category:960s in the Holy Roman Empire
290:Category:960s in the Holy Roman Empire
226:
124:Category:International music festivals
60:Category:International music festivals
33:
1227:argument above if they actually exit.
582:Category:999 establishments in Europe
566:Category:997 establishments in Europe
550:Category:982 establishments in Europe
534:Category:980 establishments in Europe
518:Category:976 establishments in Europe
502:Category:973 establishments in Europe
486:Category:968 establishments in Europe
470:Category:965 establishments in Europe
454:Category:962 establishments in Europe
430:Category:999 in the Holy Roman Empire
414:Category:997 in the Holy Roman Empire
398:Category:980 in the Holy Roman Empire
382:Category:978 in the Holy Roman Empire
366:Category:977 in the Holy Roman Empire
350:Category:976 in the Holy Roman Empire
334:Category:973 in the Holy Roman Empire
318:Category:968 in the Holy Roman Empire
302:Category:965 in the Holy Roman Empire
286:Category:962 in the Holy Roman Empire
139:Category:International film festivals
7:
960:Category:Urban rail transit in Chile
829:Category:Supporters of republicanism
807:Category:Republicans (United States)
1142:Usercat not aiding collaboration. —
1191:Category:Wikipedians who drink tea
28:
2222:(Pinging the category's creator,
2162:The result of the discussion was:
2058:(Pinging the category's creator,
1999:The result of the discussion was:
1374:The result of the discussion was:
1067:The result of the discussion was:
916:The result of the discussion was:
751:The result of the discussion was:
213:The result of the discussion was:
88:The result of the discussion was:
969:the category refers not only to
1836:
1306:Knowledge (XXG):User categories
956:Category:Rapid transit in Chile
888:Category:Rapid transit in Chile
627:to a list of another nomination
1840:
185:Years in the Holy Roman Empire
1:
2039:Category:Knowledge (XXG) FAQs
1942:03:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
1925:02:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
1563:, who is also the creator of
1388:20:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
1242:On closer inspection, all of
645:List deleted from that page.
30:
2528:00:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
2490:20:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
2463:19:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
2432:04:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
2411:04:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
2381:18:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
2335:05:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
2315:16:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
2291:05:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
2272:04:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
2259:01:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
2233:00:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
2189:00:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
2105:04:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
2088:19:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
2069:00:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
2035:Category:Knowledge (XXG) FAQ
2022:00:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1971:Category:Knowledge (XXG) FAQ
1908:20:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
1881:00:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1796:19:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
1782:15:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1733:07:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1715:00:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1682:12:30, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
1653:23:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1634:21:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
1591:22:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1576:17:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1547:16:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1526:06:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1494:07:02, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1475:17:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
1456:12:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
1317:00:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
1297:09:32, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
1279:17:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1260:05:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1238:01:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
1185:23:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
1167:17:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
1149:16:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
1090:16:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
1010:19:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
987:19:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
973:-related pages, but also to
943:16:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
859:19:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
841:21:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
819:19:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
778:16:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
694:10:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
675:18:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
655:14:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
639:19:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
612:21:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
265:16:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
218:. I note that the nominator
156:22:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
111:15:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
1207:Category:Wikipedians by pet
1199:Category:Wikipedian parents
2545:
2263:Ah, that's a good point.
2144:Please do not modify it.
2116:Please do not modify it.
1981:Please do not modify it.
1953:Please do not modify it.
1356:Please do not modify it.
1328:Please do not modify it.
1049:Please do not modify it.
1021:Please do not modify it.
898:Please do not modify it.
870:Please do not modify it.
733:Please do not modify it.
705:Please do not modify it.
195:Please do not modify it.
167:Please do not modify it.
70:Please do not modify it.
2213:Nominator's rationale:
2046:Nominator's rationale:
1604:. Journalists are not
1437:Nominator's rationale:
1195:Deleted September 2006
1175:WP:userboxes/gallery--
1140:Nominator's rationale:
967:Nominator's rationale:
802:Nominator's rationale:
438:Category:999 in Europe
422:Category:997 in Europe
406:Category:980 in Europe
390:Category:978 in Europe
374:Category:977 in Europe
358:Category:976 in Europe
342:Category:973 in Europe
326:Category:968 in Europe
310:Category:965 in Europe
294:Category:962 in Europe
135:Nominator's rationale:
2501:per BD2412. We don't
2060:User:UninvitedCompany
1379:. I am also deleting
591:Nominator's rationale
2470:(for the record) to
1693:what do you mean by
791:Category:Republicans
723:Category:Republicans
1203:Deleted April 2010)
2451:Chesterton's fence
2297:Chesterton's fence
1764:as journalists. --
233:. That is untrue:
2514:The overlap with
2227:
2187:
2063:
2020:
1934:John Pack Lambert
1879:
1780:
1754:Alastair Campbell
1748:; others include
1713:
1211:Deleted June 2007
1177:NadirAli نادر علی
1088:
941:
776:
263:
231:becomes redundant
109:
51:
50:
2536:
2482:
2424:
2391:
2373:
2307:
2251:
2221:
2199:Propose renaming
2178:
2175:
2146:
2118:
2057:
2011:
2008:
1983:
1955:
1870:
1867:
1854:
1837:WP:OC#SUBJECTIVE
1771:
1768:
1743:
1721:Polly Billington
1704:
1701:
1692:
1471:
1430:
1429:
1397:Propose deleting
1358:
1330:
1294:
1249:
1225:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
1133:
1132:
1100:Propose deleting
1079:
1076:
1051:
1023:
953:Propose renaming
932:
929:
900:
872:
788:Propose renaming
767:
764:
735:
707:
275:Propose deleting
254:
251:
224:
197:
169:
121:Propose renaming
100:
97:
72:
47:
36:
31:
2544:
2543:
2539:
2538:
2537:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2476:
2468:Keep but rename
2418:
2385:
2367:
2301:
2245:
2173:
2153:deletion review
2142:
2136:
2131:
2125:deletion review
2114:
2076:Certainly merge
2050:speedy renaming
2032:Propose merging
2006:
1990:deletion review
1979:
1973:
1968:
1962:deletion review
1951:
1865:
1849:
1841:WP:OC#ARBITRARY
1766:
1737:
1699:
1686:
1469:
1403:
1399:
1365:deletion review
1354:
1348:
1343:
1337:deletion review
1326:
1292:
1288:
1243:
1106:
1102:
1074:
1058:deletion review
1047:
1041:
1036:
1030:deletion review
1019:
977:-related ones.
927:
907:deletion review
896:
890:
885:
879:deletion review
868:
762:
742:deletion review
731:
725:
720:
714:deletion review
703:
571:Propose merging
555:Propose merging
539:Propose merging
523:Propose merging
507:Propose merging
491:Propose merging
475:Propose merging
459:Propose merging
443:Propose merging
427:Propose merging
411:Propose merging
395:Propose merging
379:Propose merging
363:Propose merging
347:Propose merging
331:Propose merging
315:Propose merging
299:Propose merging
283:Propose merging
249:
219:
204:deletion review
193:
187:
182:
176:deletion review
165:
95:
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2542:
2540:
2531:
2530:
2511:
2510:
2492:
2465:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2345:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2236:
2235:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2158:
2157:
2137:
2135:
2132:
2130:
2129:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2090:
2072:
2071:
2054:criterion C2.A
2043:
2042:
2041:
2026:
2025:
2024:
1995:
1994:
1974:
1972:
1969:
1967:
1966:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1927:
1910:
1884:
1883:
1846:
1826:
1821:
1820:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1637:
1636:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1550:
1549:
1533:There is also
1528:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1478:
1477:
1459:
1458:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1391:
1390:
1370:
1369:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1341:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1299:
1290:
1281:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1169:
1152:
1151:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1063:
1062:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1034:
1014:
1013:
1012:
990:
989:
964:
963:
962:
947:
946:
945:
912:
911:
891:
889:
886:
884:
883:
863:
862:
861:
843:
822:
821:
799:
798:
797:
782:
781:
780:
747:
746:
726:
724:
721:
719:
718:
698:
697:
696:
678:
677:
658:
657:
642:
641:
615:
614:
587:
586:
585:
584:
568:
552:
536:
520:
504:
488:
472:
456:
440:
424:
408:
392:
376:
360:
344:
328:
312:
296:
280:
269:
268:
267:
246:
209:
208:
188:
186:
183:
181:
180:
160:
159:
158:
132:
131:
130:
115:
114:
113:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2541:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2512:
2508:
2505:fix them, we
2504:
2500:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2487:
2483:
2481:
2480:
2473:
2469:
2466:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2452:
2448:
2445:
2433:
2430:
2429:
2425:
2423:
2422:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2389:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2379:
2378:
2374:
2372:
2371:
2363:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2346:
2342:
2341:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2323:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2313:
2312:
2308:
2306:
2305:
2298:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2277:
2273:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2257:
2256:
2252:
2250:
2249:
2242:
2238:
2237:
2234:
2231:
2225:
2219:
2214:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2200:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2190:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2170:
2166:
2163:
2160:
2159:
2156:
2154:
2150:
2145:
2139:
2138:
2133:
2128:
2126:
2122:
2117:
2111:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2091:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2074:
2073:
2070:
2067:
2061:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2033:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2023:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2003:
2000:
1997:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1987:
1982:
1976:
1975:
1970:
1965:
1963:
1959:
1954:
1948:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1928:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1911:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1900:Peterkingiron
1897:
1893:
1889:
1886:
1885:
1882:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1862:
1859:for creating
1858:
1853:
1852:Shakehandsman
1847:
1845:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1807:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1741:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1719:Referring to
1718:
1717:
1716:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1696:
1690:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1660:
1659:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1645:Shakehandsman
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1614:automatically
1611:
1607:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1583:Shakehandsman
1579:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1561:Shakehandsman
1558:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1518:Shakehandsman
1515:
1512:
1507:
1504:
1501:
1500:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1486:Shakehandsman
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1464:
1461:
1460:
1457:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1435:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1402:
1398:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1389:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1362:
1357:
1351:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1338:
1334:
1329:
1323:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1311:
1310:WP:USERBOXCAT
1307:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1247:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1220:
1217:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1141:
1138:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1105:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1091:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1055:
1050:
1044:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
992:
991:
988:
984:
980:
976:
975:commuter rail
972:
971:rapid transit
968:
965:
961:
957:
954:
951:
950:
949:
948:
944:
939:
935:
931:
924:
920:
917:
914:
913:
910:
908:
904:
899:
893:
892:
887:
882:
880:
876:
871:
865:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
842:
838:
834:
833:Laurel Lodged
830:
827:
824:
823:
820:
816:
812:
808:
803:
800:
796:
792:
789:
786:
785:
784:
783:
779:
774:
770:
766:
759:
755:
752:
749:
748:
745:
743:
739:
734:
728:
727:
722:
717:
715:
711:
706:
700:
699:
695:
691:
687:
686:Laurel Lodged
683:
680:
679:
676:
672:
668:
663:
660:
659:
656:
652:
648:
647:Laurel Lodged
644:
643:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
617:
616:
613:
609:
605:
604:Laurel Lodged
601:
596:
592:
589:
588:
583:
579:
575:
572:
569:
567:
563:
559:
556:
553:
551:
547:
543:
540:
537:
535:
531:
527:
524:
521:
519:
515:
511:
508:
505:
503:
499:
495:
492:
489:
487:
483:
479:
476:
473:
471:
467:
463:
460:
457:
455:
451:
447:
444:
441:
439:
435:
431:
428:
425:
423:
419:
415:
412:
409:
407:
403:
399:
396:
393:
391:
387:
383:
380:
377:
375:
371:
367:
364:
361:
359:
355:
351:
348:
345:
343:
339:
335:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
316:
313:
311:
307:
303:
300:
297:
295:
291:
287:
284:
281:
279:
276:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
261:
257:
253:
244:
240:
236:
232:
230:
225:asserts that
223:
222:Laurel Lodged
217:
214:
211:
210:
207:
205:
201:
196:
190:
189:
184:
179:
177:
173:
168:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
144:
140:
136:
133:
129:
125:
122:
119:
118:
117:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
92:
89:
86:
85:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
2506:
2502:
2494:
2485:
2478:
2477:
2467:
2446:
2427:
2420:
2419:
2376:
2369:
2368:
2359:opportunity.
2310:
2303:
2302:
2278:
2269:Black Falcon
2254:
2247:
2246:
2230:Black Falcon
2212:
2198:
2164:
2161:
2143:
2140:
2115:
2112:
2092:
2080:Marcocapelle
2075:
2066:Black Falcon
2045:
2031:
2001:
1998:
1980:
1977:
1952:
1949:
1929:
1912:
1896:then upmerge
1895:
1894:. Probably
1891:
1887:
1843:
1833:
1808:
1788:Marcocapelle
1761:
1758:Seumas Milne
1746:spin doctors
1740:Marcocapelle
1725:Marcocapelle
1689:Marcocapelle
1674:Marcocapelle
1665:
1661:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1601:
1530:
1502:
1467:
1462:
1441:WP:NARROWCAT
1436:
1396:
1385:Black Falcon
1376:
1373:
1355:
1352:
1327:
1324:
1314:Black Falcon
1301:
1289:
1286:per above. —
1283:
1266:
1222:
1221:per nom and
1218:
1171:
1155:
1144:
1139:
1099:
1069:
1066:
1048:
1045:
1020:
1017:
1002:Marcocapelle
993:
979:93.57.250.33
966:
952:
918:
915:
897:
894:
869:
866:
851:Marcocapelle
825:
801:
787:
753:
750:
732:
729:
704:
701:
681:
661:
631:Marcocapelle
618:
590:
570:
554:
538:
522:
506:
490:
474:
458:
442:
426:
410:
394:
378:
362:
346:
330:
314:
298:
282:
274:
216:no consensus
215:
212:
194:
191:
166:
163:
142:
134:
120:
90:
87:
69:
66:
2520:Narky Blert
2340:directory:
2224:User:BD2412
1817:WP:DEFINING
1750:Lance Price
1610:possibility
623:WP:SMALLCAT
2176:HairedGirl
2009:HairedGirl
1868:HairedGirl
1857:WP:TROUTed
1855:should be
1830:WP:OCASSOC
1813:WP:OCASSOC
1769:HairedGirl
1702:HairedGirl
1539:DuncanHill
1506:WP:OCASSOC
1445:WP:OCASSOC
1077:HairedGirl
930:HairedGirl
795:Category:?
765:HairedGirl
252:HairedGirl
98:HairedGirl
55:January 29
43:January 30
38:January 28
2509:fix them.
2149:talk page
2121:talk page
2095:per nom.
1986:talk page
1958:talk page
1569:Naturenet
1449:Naturenet
1361:talk page
1333:talk page
1160:Naturenet
1054:talk page
1026:talk page
903:talk page
875:talk page
738:talk page
710:talk page
237:contains
200:talk page
172:talk page
75:talk page
2403:VegaDark
2351:options.
2327:VegaDark
2283:VegaDark
2184:contribs
2151:or in a
2123:or in a
2097:VegaDark
2017:contribs
1988:or in a
1960:or in a
1917:Observoz
1876:contribs
1777:contribs
1710:contribs
1618:fairness
1363:or in a
1335:or in a
1252:VegaDark
1246:NadirAli
1230:VegaDark
1085:contribs
1056:or in a
1028:or in a
938:contribs
919:relisted
905:or in a
877:or in a
845:Perhaps
773:contribs
754:relisted
740:or in a
712:or in a
260:contribs
202:or in a
174:or in a
137:As with
106:contribs
77:or in a
20: |
1888:Comment
1626:Bearcat
1606:defined
1531:Comment
1470:Lugnuts
1414:history
1271:Bearcat
1117:history
811:Bearcat
682:Comment
619:Support
580:and to
564:and to
548:and to
532:and to
516:and to
500:and to
484:and to
468:and to
452:and to
436:and to
420:and to
404:and to
388:and to
372:and to
356:and to
340:and to
324:and to
308:and to
292:and to
148:Bearcat
2495:Rename
2479:bd2412
2447:Rename
2421:bd2412
2388:BD2412
2370:bd2412
2304:bd2412
2279:Delete
2248:bd2412
2180:(talk)
2165:rename
2052:under
2013:(talk)
1930:Delete
1872:(talk)
1809:Delete
1773:(talk)
1706:(talk)
1662:Rename
1602:Delete
1463:Delete
1377:delete
1302:Delete
1284:Delete
1267:Delete
1219:Delete
1156:Delete
1081:(talk)
1070:delete
994:Oppose
934:(talk)
769:(talk)
256:(talk)
143:staged
102:(talk)
91:rename
2455:Oculi
2174:Brown
2093:Merge
2007:Brown
2002:merge
1892:purge
1866:Brown
1767:Brown
1700:Brown
1567:. ==
1422:watch
1418:links
1312:. --
1125:watch
1121:links
1075:Brown
928:Brown
826:Alt 1
763:Brown
250:Brown
96:Brown
46:: -->
16:<
2524:talk
2503:help
2459:talk
2407:talk
2331:talk
2287:talk
2171:. --
2101:talk
2084:talk
2004:. --
1938:talk
1921:talk
1913:Keep
1904:talk
1825:ago?
1811:per
1792:talk
1756:and
1729:talk
1678:talk
1649:talk
1630:talk
1587:talk
1573:Talk
1543:talk
1522:talk
1503:Keep
1490:talk
1453:Talk
1443:and
1426:logs
1410:talk
1406:edit
1308:and
1275:talk
1256:talk
1234:talk
1181:talk
1172:Keep
1164:Talk
1145:swpb
1129:logs
1113:talk
1109:edit
1072:. --
1006:talk
983:talk
925:. --
855:talk
837:talk
815:talk
760:. --
690:talk
671:talk
667:Tim!
662:Keep
651:talk
635:talk
621:per
608:talk
600:here
152:talk
93:. --
35:<
2497:to
2355:it.
2228:--
2204:to
2182:• (
2167:to
2064:--
2037:to
2015:• (
1874:• (
1775:• (
1762:not
1708:• (
1666:BBC
1622:not
1291:MBL
1197:),
1083:• (
958:to
936:• (
921:at
793:to
771:• (
756:at
576:to
560:to
544:to
528:to
512:to
496:to
480:to
464:to
448:to
432:to
416:to
400:to
384:to
368:to
352:to
336:to
320:to
304:to
288:to
258:• (
126:to
104:• (
22:Log
2526:)
2507:do
2474:.
2461:)
2453:.
2409:)
2333:)
2299:.
2289:)
2220:"
2103:)
2086:)
2056:.
1940:)
1923:)
1906:)
1832::
1794:)
1752:,
1731:)
1680:)
1651:)
1632:)
1589:)
1571:|
1545:)
1524:)
1492:)
1451:|
1424:|
1420:|
1416:|
1412:|
1408:|
1277:)
1258:)
1236:)
1205:,
1183:)
1162:|
1127:|
1123:|
1119:|
1115:|
1111:|
1008:)
1000:.
985:)
857:)
849:?
839:)
831:?
817:)
692:)
673:)
653:)
637:)
610:)
241:,
154:)
2522:(
2486:T
2457:(
2428:T
2405:(
2390::
2386:@
2377:T
2329:(
2311:T
2285:(
2255:T
2226:)
2216:"
2186:)
2099:(
2082:(
2062:)
2019:)
1936:(
1919:(
1902:(
1878:)
1850:@
1844:.
1790:(
1779:)
1742::
1738:@
1727:(
1712:)
1691::
1687:@
1676:(
1647:(
1628:(
1585:(
1541:(
1520:(
1488:(
1428:)
1404:(
1273:(
1254:(
1248::
1244:@
1232:(
1213:)
1209:{
1201:(
1193:(
1179:(
1131:)
1107:(
1087:)
1004:(
981:(
940:)
853:(
835:(
813:(
775:)
688:(
669:(
649:(
633:(
606:(
262:)
220:@
150:(
108:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.