1005:- Actually, I think the certifications can be way more specific and therefore more useful than the occupation titles. The English Knowledge (XXG) is NOT solely the American Knowledge (XXG). And I think it would show bias to suggest that an occupation title in one location is the same as an occupation title in some other location. Honestly, these vary even by company and corporation. And good luck defining a "systems engineer" between different corporations. And this doesn't even get involved in the worthlessness of the word "programmer". where that could be anyone typing in BASIC from a magazine to a systems architect of some kind, and beyond, depending on company definitions, and really the time period in question as well. The closest to standard "might" be health professionals, due to certain international standards, but I wouldn't make any guarantees even on those. The only reason I am striking the reverse merge suggestion is that I would guess that there are those in each of the above categories who are NOT credentialed, and so by reverse merging we'll be miscategorising Wikipedians. -
1169:. While I agree that someone with a particular credential (and more broadly in a particular field of work) might have more of an inclination to go out and find sources and/or have better access to sources to add information to an article, categorizing those who only have "credentials" in a particular area excludes others who may be just as inclined to find sources but happen to not have said credential, but merely an interest in the field.
1300:. From my perspective, it does not really matter whether a particular user is a current (practicing) or former (non-practicing) accountant or engineer. I consider the professions user categories to be useful only insofar as they are indicative of above-average familiarity with or knowledge of a particular subject; in this context, there is not much difference between practicing and non-practicing professionals. --
1165:- I don't think specifying a user's specific credential in a given field is particularly helpful information for purposes of collaboration. If said credential is notable enough for its own page, then the talk page of said credential would be a preferable collaboration environment. If such users are sought out for information regarding their field, we run in to the problem of
1367:
quite sure the same would happen here. Do we have any examples of actual use? I've a bunch of skill and profession template on my userpage and never been contacted because of them. If I have a question about accountancy I'll more likely go to the wiki-project rather look through a category full of users who left many years ago. So its basically comes down to
1017:'credentials' tree. My perspective came from considering the question, "Would an editor seeking the expertise, resources or knowledge of an accountant, for example, start by searching a category of professions or one of credentials, or would she benefit from locating an accountant with a particular designation exclusive of all other accountants?" --
1989:
to the events by year category. OK, I got here with some TfT creations where the list was expanded by another editor. For the most part, this tree is not well populated. What it contains is a random collection of things. The formation of groups, talks, treaties, organizations established, people and
1390:
the credential cats per our discussion above. (And noting that the target occupation cats weren't tagged). Though with the exception of the nursing ones (RN and LPN). I think that these are different than the rest and that a reverse merge to the more specific subcats (though maybe with a better name)
1028:
Fair point. Though I dunno. There's a difference between a podiatrist and gastroenterologist. And a difference between a corporate tax lawyer and a criminal lawyer. Though I'd agree that there might be a point where specific might be too specific, I'm not entirely convinced of that per the exception
1148:
claiming professional degrees that he apparently didn't have. So with all that (and more) in mind, I would be fine with the whole occupation tree deleted. But until that time, I'd like to see as much vagueness and ambiguity removed from such cats, and move towards something as concrete and clear as
782:
the general rule is no award category. 124.186.184.92|124.186.184.92 your argument is "other stuff exists" which does not work. Over time there have been attempts to delete various award categories, and many have succeeded. The structure of wikipedia makes it much easier to create than to delete
1646:
This user category is sparsely used (presently only by myself) because 1) it isn't known to many people and 2) there aren't many ABFDE-certified examiners, period. I had hoped that more ABFDE users would 'join' in time but that hasn't happened. Others might eventually add to the category but, in
1366:
including all sub categories. These categories are all created by templates, the users might not even be aware that they are in these category. Many years back we had the great userbox purge, which caused much commotion but no ill effects when most of them and their associated categories went. I'm
1246:
Upon further reflection regarding this, I realized that people with a particular "certification" does not necessarily mean they currently actually practice in their field, so I would oppose merging (the noms below already closed so can't change my vote, but oh well). Instead, I think we should
1234:
I think that a category-by-category approach, as in the two cases below, would be the most prudent; eliminating the nominated container categories would be a step in that direction since it would permit consideration of each 'credential' category in the context of its profession parent category
1219:
I'm not entirely sure. For the below ones merging made sense because there was only one category for each, for these others there's quite a few subcategories which means a merge would put quite a few groups into one big category. I think my preference would be to discuss this on a category by
1846:"media": I see subcats for radio, publications, magazines about foo, etc. These are not individual creative works. In such cases, no merge is necessary, or even possible, imo. It's just a question of splitting and populating new "works about" categories, where actually required (i.e., not
1016:
I am not of the opinion that we should not have the certifications categories (I've actually not formed an opinion yet), and my goal with this nomination is only to change how we organize them – by using the existing and relatively well-developed 'professions' category tree instead of the
273:
Peterkingiron, I also would have to see a good argument to support this division anywhere, but before making any decision on the broader issue, we should open it to a discussion involving most if not all of the privately held company cats (runs away in fear at being the one making the CfD
1626:, an organization which serves Canada, Mexico and the United States. It is not useful, in my opinion, to limit this already sparsely populated category to three countries only; the category should be, instead, opened to QDEs in all countries and made a subcategory of
1647:
reality, there are only a few hundred ABFDE-certified examiners in total (it is a difficult certification to obtain and most QDEs won't ever try) so it would never be a large number. If a sparsely-used category is unacceptable, go ahead and delete/rename it. —
1344:
I'm not sure falsely claiming to be a nurse is any different than falsely claiming to be an RN so I don't see a big distinction betweening allowing one than another. (Maybe the licensing boards own the credentials so it presents less of a legal issue.)
975:
This category tree is a sub-optimal method of organizing
Wikipedians by expertise. It consists primarily of container categories that function as an intermediate layer between profession user categories, such as
1990:
so on. The big issue is what does this subcategory mean? One could argue that almost every event during the cold war belongs here. So it might be easier and more accurate to include the events by year in
1285:, I think that it could include any thing which gives a certificate (including an eclair-eating expert), and that suggests to me incredible category bloat. And besides that - We're all Wikipedians here. -
1048:
seems like a good example). The problem in each case, of course, is that the split must occur naturally – e.g., users must identify themselves as tax lawyers or criminal lawyers before we can split out
1140:
I don't wholly disagree. I don't like bias for degrees over experience/knowledge - or vice versa, for that matter. (We're all
Wikipedians here, regardless of background, after all.) And while we
1677:
per nom while noting my misgivings about the majority of the "Wikipedians by skill/profession" tree in the nominations above, merging these cuts some of the fat. 09:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
854:
646:
42:
37:
1194:
I would say that same logic applies to all occupation cats (or most, at least - I could think of an exception for occupations where the WMF might possibly seek out people for something).
1068:
Well, yes and no. As so many of these sorts of cats are populated simply by userboxes, I would be surprised if there aren't some specific ones to re-target from broad to specific... -
783:
categories. I often have wondered if there might be a way to fix this problem, but for now it means that we have lots of categories that are not in line with the rules for categories.
699:"Per nom" means "per nominator", and indicates that the editor supports the rationale set out by the nominator. It is nonsense only if the nominator's original rationale was nonsense.
219:
239:
The parent category is not big enough to justify splitting it. Anyway normally we split company categories by type such as publishing companies, banks, retail companies etc..
1994:
for the period of the Cold War. If consensus supports this upmerge, I'll add all of the subcategories to the nomination. It may also be wise to upmerge all of these to
1610:
1497:
is available to human resources professionals in Canada, making this category is extremely limited in geographic scope, but also is not uncommon, with about half of the
211:
92:
1498:
398:
The other articles were all merged into the parent, leaving a category populated by a single article. I would say that this is a textbook case of over-categorization.
1274:
It seems to me that we're splitting a fine hair here. What we're dancing around I think is that both trees should be deleted, and we're each talking about which is
1208:
I don't disagree. but until such time as such a nomination, I prefer the credential ones over the occupation ones, for my reasons above. What is your preference? -
1368:
1960:
This merge cannot be completed unless the categories are nominated and merged. Please do that, and then if that nomination passes, this can go forward as well.--
1517:
per nom while noting my misgivings about the majority of the "Wikipedians by skill/profession" tree in the nomination above, merging these cuts some of the fat.
1623:
1391:
would be more helpful than less in that case, so I would like to list (relist) that in a separate nom. (Note that both the LPN and RN subcats are empty atm.) -
1327:
I don't believe we should be encouraging people to claim qualifications in an official-looking way without a system to check on the veracity of those claims.
215:
190:
122:
96:
1481:
1123:
193:
which should be sufficient for now. If we decide company ownership is not a useful categorization scheme, a much larger discussion needs to be opened. -
21:
1281:
At this point, I oppose the merge, but would support deletion. A user page notice of what certifications a person has should be enough. As I look at
981:
118:
984:; the only contents which do not fall under this label are two categories nominated below and two categories which are otherwise categorized. --
17:
1828:
1759:
965:
870:
713:
665:
1083:
727:
685:
925:
934:
2018:
1627:
1297:
766:
470:
433:
170:
141:
1251:
Wikipedians by credential categories, or rename all to "Wikipedians interested in x" with x being the field the certification is in.
961:
952:
1606:
1220:
category basis since some credentials/groups might possibly have different arguments regarding a merge to their prospective field.
1079:
943:
1044:
That's a good point, and a strong case probably could be made for splitting several of the well-populated professions categories (
1477:
1091:
1087:
977:
956:
929:
649:, and the 3 subsequent deletion were all G4 speedies. After 4 years, I think it's appropriate to test consensus again, because
1095:
896:
1755:
582:
133:. There doesn't need to be a separate category for private companies based in Las Vegas if there is already a general one.
1275:
1054:
1045:
938:
904:
1816:
1619:
887:
2122:
2102:
2085:
2068:
2051:
2026:
2007:
1969:
1945:
1917:
1897:
1874:
1859:
1837:
1799:
1779:
1747:
1723:
1695:
1667:
1652:
1636:
1598:
1574:
1546:
1526:
1507:
1490:
1469:
1445:
1417:
1397:
1380:
1354:
1336:
1306:
1291:
1260:
1241:
1229:
1214:
1203:
1189:
1178:
1155:
1135:
1104:
1074:
1063:
1039:
1023:
1011:
990:
875:
840:
812:
792:
774:
757:
735:
718:
693:
670:
627:
590:
567:
543:
515:
495:
478:
461:
444:
415:
355:
331:
303:
283:
265:
248:
231:
202:
181:
152:
110:
78:
1855:
1824:
1775:
573:
370:
256:-- I am doubtful whether it is useful to split companies as to whether they are private or public (publicly quoted).
1050:
2098:
2081:
1790:
1743:
1594:
1465:
1350:
947:
563:
351:
1661:
but it would likely be a more useful resource for other editors if it was less restrictive and more populated. --
1122:
I don't know why we keep these categories. I seriously doubt its value in terms of collaboration especially since
610:
Category has been created and deleted on four previous occasions for being non-defining. See the deletion log for
2064:
1893:
866:
788:
709:
661:
491:
361:
279:
244:
378:
1977:
1812:
731:
689:
1820:
1805:
1809:
726:
There are tons of hall of fame categories on
Knowledge (XXG), why is the Disney hall of fame any different.--
2047:
1965:
611:
261:
106:
681:
2022:
1851:
1771:
1494:
1332:
770:
645:, but I don't recommend speedy deletion in this case because the only previous deletion discussion was on
474:
436:
429:
173:
166:
144:
137:
650:
2118:
2094:
2077:
2003:
1941:
1913:
1739:
1719:
1691:
1590:
1570:
1542:
1461:
1441:
1413:
1346:
836:
808:
559:
539:
511:
347:
327:
299:
74:
2060:
1889:
1376:
859:
784:
702:
654:
487:
406:
275:
240:
457:
2043:
1961:
1522:
1256:
1225:
1199:
1174:
1131:
257:
102:
1770:
Not sure how we missed this one, but all these "media" are creative works, per parent category.
440:
177:
148:
2117:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2039:
1995:
1991:
1912:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1690:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1663:
1632:
1541:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1503:
1412:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1328:
1302:
1265:
Fair point, but that applies just as well to the occupation cats. A nurse isn't necessarily a
1237:
1059:
1019:
986:
807:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
623:
510:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
426:
298:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
198:
163:
134:
2042:
would make rather too large a category for comfort; yes, I know there is no official limit.
1940:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1718:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1569:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1440:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
835:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
538:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
326:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1999:
1033:. (And again, we're dealing with what our presumptions of what these occupations entail.) -
1166:
1141:
642:
1998:
in addition to the suggestion on the nomination. So I'm open to options. Discussion on.
1372:
753:
401:
227:
1847:
1030:
745:
638:
1183:
To clarify, you are referring to only credentials? or all occupation cats in general? -
1126:. The potential for abuse seems much greater than the potential for collaborative work.
453:
2059:
there is no reason to seperate out these events from other events in the given years.
1518:
1282:
1252:
1221:
1195:
1170:
1127:
1648:
1296:
You make a strong case against the certifications categories, but I disagree about
616:
194:
1235:
rather than in the context of a generalized 'Wikipedians by credential' tree. --
701:
More importantly, do you offer any positive reason for keeping this category? --
749:
223:
678:, it was deleted for such stupid reasons like "per nom" and other nonsense.
1870:
1833:
1795:
1393:
1287:
1210:
1185:
1151:
1100:
1070:
1035:
1007:
1934:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1712:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1563:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1434:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
829:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
532:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
320:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
191:
Category:Privately held companies based in the Las Vegas metropolitan area
1868:. As far as I can see, it's mostly works split by media type. -
1864:
And when you look at those subcats, they're filled with ....
119:
Category:Privately held companies based in Las Vegas, Nevada
60:
Category:Privately held companies based in Las Vegas, Nevada
2038:
into categories by decade. I suspect that merging all to
1618:
This sparsely populated user category is for professional
2111:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1906:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1888:
per nom, and the others things need to be merged as well.
1684:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1535:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1406:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1271:
nurse. But the person may still self-identify as a nurse.
801:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
504:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
292:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1493:
beyond that which is served by its parent category. The
1829:
Category:Media inspired by the legend of the Holy Grail
912:
908:
900:
892:
598:
594:
586:
578:
386:
382:
374:
366:
220:
Category:Privately held companies of the United States
2125:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1948:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1920:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1842:Actually, some of the contents of those categories
1726:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1698:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1577:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1549:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1448:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1420:). No further edits should be made to this section.
926:
Category:Wikipedians with accountancy designations‎
843:). No further edits should be made to this section.
815:). No further edits should be made to this section.
546:). No further edits should be made to this section.
518:). No further edits should be made to this section.
334:). No further edits should be made to this section.
306:). No further edits should be made to this section.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1369:Knowledge (XXG):Overcategorization/User categories
935:Category:Wikipedians with engineering credentials‎
1611:Category:Wikipedian questioned document examiners
222:is not in general more specific than 'by state'.
212:Category:Privately held companies based in Nevada
93:Category:Privately held companies based in Nevada
1499:Canadian Council of Human Resources Associations
1371:- Categories that are overly narrow in scope.--
1146:a certain very well-respected Wikipedian editor
962:Category:Wikipedians with security designations
953:Category:Wikipedians with pharmacy credentials‎
1607:Category:Wikipedians with ABFDE certification‎
1556:Category:Wikipedians with ABFDE certification‎
944:Category:Wikipedians with nursing credentials‎
1624:American Board of Forensic Document Examiners
216:Category:Companies based in Las Vegas, Nevada
123:Category:Companies based in Las Vegas, Nevada
97:Category:Companies based in Las Vegas, Nevada
8:
1388:Delete all (including subcats), do not merge
748:, as non-defining, and per many precedents.
1489:This category does not appear to fulfill a
1482:Category:Wikipedian human resources workers
1478:Category:Wikipedians with CHRP designations
1427:Category:Wikipedians with CHRP designations
1124:on the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog
980:, and credential user categories, such as
982:Category:Wikipedians with CA designations
18:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion
1084:Knowledge (XXG):Userboxes/Certifications
1144:, I also remember the controversy with
1760:Category:Works based on actual events
1756:Category:Media based on actual events
1705:Category:Media based on actual events
1501:' members having the designation. --
966:Category:Wikipedian systems engineers
7:
1080:Knowledge (XXG):Userboxes/Profession
1055:Category:Wikipedian criminal lawyers
1092:Knowledge (XXG):Userboxes/Expertise
1088:Knowledge (XXG):Userboxes/Education
641:, as non-defining. (This meets the
1817:Category:Media about free software
1628:Category:Wikipedians by profession
1298:Category:Wikipedians by profession
1096:Knowledge (XXG):Userboxes/Military
888:Category:Wikipedians by credential
822:Category:Wikipedians by credential
28:
1955:The result of the discussion was:
1831:, and a bunch more, I think... -
1733:The result of the discussion was:
1584:The result of the discussion was:
1455:The result of the discussion was:
850:The result of the discussion was:
553:The result of the discussion was:
341:The result of the discussion was:
88:The result of the discussion was:
1825:Category:Media about agriculture
574:Category:Disney Legends honorees
525:Category:Disney Legends honorees
1051:Category:Wikipedian tax lawyers
978:Category:Wikipedian accountants
957:Category:Wikipedian pharmacists
930:Category:Wikipedian accountants
1:
2103:05:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
2086:00:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
2069:05:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
2052:17:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
2027:03:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
1970:15:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
1898:05:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
1791:Category:Media based on manga
1748:00:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
1620:questioned document examiners
1599:00:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
1527:09:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
1470:00:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
1398:19:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
1381:11:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
1355:00:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
1337:00:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
1307:01:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
1292:23:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
1261:19:12, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
1242:23:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
1230:07:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
1215:18:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
1204:18:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
1190:16:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
1179:09:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
1046:Category:Wikipedian engineers
939:Category:Wikipedian engineers
876:01:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
793:05:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
775:03:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
568:00:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
496:05:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
479:03:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
356:00:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
284:05:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
266:17:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
111:15:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
30:
2008:00:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1980:to events by year categories
1875:05:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1860:01:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1838:02:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1800:02:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1789:- Nope you missed one : ) -
1780:01:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1668:20:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1653:19:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1637:06:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1508:06:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1156:17:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1136:12:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1105:17:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1075:17:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1064:05:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1040:00:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1024:23:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1012:18:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
991:06:42, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
758:09:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
736:14:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
719:11:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
694:09:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
671:09:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
643:speedy deletion criterion G4
628:08:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
462:14:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
445:14:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
416:12:45, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
249:03:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
232:20:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
203:19:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
182:14:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
153:14:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
1622:who have been certified by
362:Category:Maryland Route 200
313:Category:Maryland Route 200
2142:
948:Category:Wikipedian nurses
1978:Category:Cold War by year
1927:Category:Cold War by year
1813:Category:Media about wine
437:Random Picture of the Day
174:Random Picture of the Day
145:Random Picture of the Day
2114:Please do not modify it.
1937:Please do not modify it.
1909:Please do not modify it.
1821:Category:Media about art
1806:Category:Media by medium
1715:Please do not modify it.
1687:Please do not modify it.
1566:Please do not modify it.
1538:Please do not modify it.
1437:Please do not modify it.
1409:Please do not modify it.
1098:, just to pick a few. -
832:Please do not modify it.
804:Please do not modify it.
535:Please do not modify it.
507:Please do not modify it.
323:Please do not modify it.
295:Please do not modify it.
70:Please do not modify it.
1810:Category:Media by genre
612:Category:Disney Legends
1984:Nominator's rationale:
1765:Nominator's rationale:
1657:It's not unacceptable
1616:Nominator's rationale:
1491:collaborative function
1487:Nominator's rationale:
973:Nominator's rationale:
608:Nominator's rationale:
396:Nominator's rationale:
128:Nominator's rationale:
1276:the lesser of the two
855:CfD 2012 February 29
651:consensus can change
1958:conditional merge.
2061:John Pack Lambert
2040:Category:Cold War
1996:Category:Cold War
1992:Category:Cold War
1890:John Pack Lambert
1852:Shawn in Montreal
1772:Shawn in Montreal
1167:original research
874:
785:John Pack Lambert
717:
684:comment added by
669:
488:John Pack Lambert
276:John Pack Lambert
241:John Pack Lambert
51:
50:
2133:
2116:
2095:Mad Man American
2078:RevelationDirect
1939:
1911:
1740:Timrollpickering
1717:
1689:
1604:Propose renaming
1591:Timrollpickering
1568:
1540:
1495:CHRP designation
1462:Timrollpickering
1439:
1411:
1347:RevelationDirect
917:
916:
884:Propose deleting
865:
862:
834:
806:
708:
705:
696:
660:
657:
619:
603:
602:
560:Timrollpickering
537:
509:
414:
411:
404:
391:
390:
348:Timrollpickering
325:
297:
210:further back to
72:
47:
36:
31:
2141:
2140:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2123:deletion review
2112:
2093:per nominator.
2034:upmerging, but
1975:Propose merging
1946:deletion review
1935:
1929:
1924:
1918:deletion review
1907:
1804:These as well:
1753:Propose merging
1724:deletion review
1713:
1707:
1702:
1696:deletion review
1685:
1575:deletion review
1564:
1558:
1553:
1547:deletion review
1536:
1475:Propose merging
1446:deletion review
1435:
1429:
1424:
1418:deletion review
1407:
921:Propose merging
890:
886:
860:
841:deletion review
830:
824:
819:
813:deletion review
802:
703:
679:
655:
647:23 January 2008
617:
576:
572:
544:deletion review
533:
527:
522:
516:deletion review
505:
410:
407:
402:
399:
364:
360:
332:deletion review
321:
315:
310:
304:deletion review
293:
116:Propose merging
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2139:
2137:
2128:
2127:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2088:
2071:
2054:
2029:
2011:
2010:
1981:
1972:
1951:
1950:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1922:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1783:
1782:
1762:
1750:
1729:
1728:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1700:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1640:
1639:
1613:
1601:
1580:
1579:
1559:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1551:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1511:
1510:
1484:
1472:
1451:
1450:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1422:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1384:
1383:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1279:
1272:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
994:
993:
970:
969:
968:
959:
950:
941:
932:
918:
880:
879:
878:
846:
845:
825:
823:
820:
818:
817:
797:
796:
795:
777:
760:
728:124.186.184.92
724:
723:
722:
721:
700:
686:124.186.184.92
673:
631:
630:
605:
604:
570:
549:
548:
528:
526:
523:
521:
520:
500:
499:
498:
481:
464:
447:
419:
418:
408:
393:
392:
358:
337:
336:
316:
314:
311:
309:
308:
288:
287:
286:
268:
251:
234:
205:
184:
156:
155:
125:
113:
91:merge to both
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2138:
2126:
2124:
2120:
2115:
2109:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2072:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2055:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2044:Peterkingiron
2041:
2037:
2033:
2030:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2013:
2012:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1988:
1985:
1982:
1979:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1962:Mike Selinker
1959:
1956:
1953:
1952:
1949:
1947:
1943:
1938:
1932:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1919:
1915:
1910:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1884:
1876:
1873:
1872:
1867:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1836:
1835:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1792:
1788:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1766:
1763:
1761:
1757:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1734:
1731:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1721:
1716:
1710:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1697:
1693:
1688:
1682:
1681:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1666:
1665:
1660:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1650:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1638:
1635:
1634:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1614:
1612:
1608:
1605:
1602:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1585:
1582:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1572:
1567:
1561:
1560:
1555:
1550:
1548:
1544:
1539:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1506:
1505:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1479:
1476:
1473:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1443:
1438:
1432:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1419:
1415:
1410:
1404:
1403:
1399:
1396:
1395:
1389:
1386:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1343:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1308:
1305:
1304:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1284:
1283:Certification
1280:
1277:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1118:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1056:
1052:
1047:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1004:
1001:
1000:
999:Reverse merge
996:
995:
992:
989:
988:
983:
979:
974:
971:
967:
963:
960:
958:
954:
951:
949:
945:
942:
940:
936:
933:
931:
927:
924:
923:
922:
919:
914:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
889:
885:
882:
881:
877:
872:
868:
864:
857:
856:
851:
848:
847:
844:
842:
838:
833:
827:
826:
821:
816:
814:
810:
805:
799:
798:
794:
790:
786:
781:
778:
776:
772:
768:
764:
761:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
740:
739:
738:
737:
733:
729:
720:
715:
711:
707:
698:
697:
695:
691:
687:
683:
677:
674:
672:
667:
663:
659:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
633:
632:
629:
625:
621:
620:
613:
609:
606:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
575:
571:
569:
565:
561:
557:
554:
551:
550:
547:
545:
541:
536:
530:
529:
524:
519:
517:
513:
508:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
480:
476:
472:
468:
465:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
446:
442:
438:
435:
431:
428:
424:
421:
420:
417:
413:
412:
405:
397:
394:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
359:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
339:
338:
335:
333:
329:
324:
318:
317:
312:
307:
305:
301:
296:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
272:
269:
267:
263:
259:
258:Peterkingiron
255:
252:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
183:
179:
175:
172:
168:
165:
162:nominator. -
161:
158:
157:
154:
150:
146:
143:
139:
136:
132:
129:
126:
124:
120:
117:
114:
112:
108:
104:
103:Mike Selinker
100:
98:
94:
89:
86:
85:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
2113:
2110:
2090:
2073:
2056:
2035:
2031:
2019:76.7.231.130
2014:
1986:
1983:
1974:
1957:
1954:
1936:
1933:
1908:
1905:
1885:
1869:
1865:
1843:
1832:
1794:
1786:
1767:
1764:
1752:
1735:
1732:
1714:
1711:
1686:
1683:
1674:
1664:Black Falcon
1662:
1658:
1643:
1633:Black Falcon
1631:
1615:
1603:
1586:
1583:
1565:
1562:
1537:
1534:
1514:
1504:Black Falcon
1502:
1486:
1474:
1457:
1454:
1436:
1433:
1408:
1405:
1392:
1387:
1363:
1341:
1329:Stuartyeates
1303:Black Falcon
1301:
1286:
1267:
1266:
1248:
1238:Black Falcon
1236:
1209:
1184:
1162:
1150:
1149:possible. -
1145:
1119:
1099:
1069:
1060:Black Falcon
1058:
1034:
1020:Black Falcon
1018:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
987:Black Falcon
985:
972:
920:
883:
853:relisted at
852:
849:
831:
828:
803:
800:
779:
767:76.7.231.130
762:
741:
725:
680:— Preceding
675:
634:
615:
607:
555:
552:
534:
531:
506:
503:
483:
471:76.7.231.130
466:
449:
427:Presidentman
422:
400:
395:
343:
340:
322:
319:
294:
291:
270:
253:
236:
207:
186:
164:Presidentman
159:
135:Presidentman
130:
127:
115:
90:
87:
69:
66:
2000:Vegaswikian
1031:WP:OC#SMALL
746:WP:OC#AWARD
639:WP:OC#AWARD
425:per nom. -
403:Imzadi 1979
2036:also merge
1268:practicing
1249:delete all
1029:stated at
863:HairedGirl
706:HairedGirl
658:HairedGirl
274:postings).
55:February 7
43:February 8
38:February 6
2119:talk page
2076:per nom.
2017:per nom.
1942:talk page
1914:talk page
1720:talk page
1692:talk page
1649:RB Ostrum
1571:talk page
1543:talk page
1442:talk page
1414:talk page
1364:Merge all
837:talk page
809:talk page
765:per nom.
540:talk page
512:talk page
469:per nom.
454:Wild Wolf
452:per nom.
328:talk page
300:talk page
75:talk page
2121:or in a
1944:or in a
1916:or in a
1722:or in a
1694:or in a
1644:Comment:
1573:or in a
1545:or in a
1519:VegaDark
1444:or in a
1416:or in a
1253:VegaDark
1222:VegaDark
1196:VegaDark
1171:VegaDark
1128:Pichpich
871:contribs
839:or in a
811:or in a
714:contribs
682:unsigned
666:contribs
542:or in a
514:or in a
486:per nom.
441:Talkback
434:contribs
330:or in a
302:or in a
178:Talkback
171:contribs
149:Talkback
142:contribs
77:or in a
20: |
2074:Support
2057:Upmerge
2032:Support
1987:UpMerge
1886:Upmerge
1787:Comment
1768:Upmerge
1342:Comment
1163:Comment
1120:Comment
1003:Comment
901:history
618:Lugnuts
587:history
467:Support
423:Support
375:history
271:Comment
254:Comment
195:choster
160:Support
1659:per se
1587:Rename
1142:WP:AGF
1094:, and
867:(talk)
780:Delete
763:Delete
742:Delete
710:(talk)
662:(talk)
635:Delete
556:Delete
484:Delete
450:Delete
344:Delete
2091:Merge
2015:Merge
1866:works
1848:WP:OC
1736:Merge
1675:Merge
1630:. --
1515:Merge
1458:Merge
1373:Salix
1057:. --
909:watch
905:links
861:Brown
750:Oculi
704:Brown
656:Brown
653:). --
595:watch
591:links
383:watch
379:links
237:Merge
224:Oculi
208:Merge
187:Merge
131:Merge
46:: -->
16:<
2099:talk
2082:talk
2065:talk
2048:talk
2023:talk
2004:talk
1966:talk
1894:talk
1871:jc37
1856:talk
1834:jc37
1796:jc37
1776:talk
1744:talk
1595:talk
1523:talk
1466:talk
1394:jc37
1377:talk
1351:talk
1333:talk
1288:jc37
1257:talk
1226:talk
1211:jc37
1200:talk
1186:jc37
1175:talk
1152:jc37
1132:talk
1101:jc37
1071:jc37
1053:and
1036:jc37
1008:jc37
913:logs
897:talk
893:edit
858:. --
789:talk
771:talk
754:talk
744:per
732:talk
690:talk
676:Keep
637:per
624:talk
599:logs
583:talk
579:edit
564:talk
492:talk
475:talk
458:talk
430:talk
387:logs
371:talk
367:edit
352:talk
280:talk
262:talk
245:talk
228:talk
214:and
199:talk
167:talk
138:talk
107:talk
95:and
35:<
1850:).
1844:are
1758:to
1609:to
1480:to
1379:):
964:to
955:to
946:to
937:to
928:to
869:• (
712:• (
664:• (
189:to
121:to
22:Log
2101:)
2084:)
2067:)
2050:)
2025:)
2006:)
1968:)
1896:)
1858:)
1827:,
1823:,
1819:,
1815:,
1808:,
1793:-
1778:)
1746:)
1738:.
1651:.
1597:)
1589:.
1525:)
1468:)
1460:.
1353:)
1335:)
1259:)
1228:)
1202:)
1177:)
1134:)
1090:,
1086:,
1082:,
911:|
907:|
903:|
899:|
895:|
791:)
773:)
756:)
734:)
692:)
626:)
614:.
597:|
593:|
589:|
585:|
581:|
566:)
558:.
494:)
477:)
460:)
443:)
432:·
385:|
381:|
377:|
373:|
369:|
354:)
346:.
282:)
264:)
247:)
230:)
218:.
201:)
180:)
169:·
151:)
140:·
109:)
101:--
2097:(
2080:(
2063:(
2046:(
2021:(
2002:(
1964:(
1892:(
1854:(
1774:(
1742:(
1593:(
1521:(
1464:(
1375:(
1349:(
1331:(
1278:.
1255:(
1224:(
1198:(
1173:(
1130:(
915:)
891:(
873:)
787:(
769:(
752:(
730:(
716:)
688:(
668:)
622:(
601:)
577:(
562:(
490:(
473:(
456:(
439:(
409:→
389:)
365:(
350:(
278:(
260:(
243:(
226:(
197:(
176:(
147:(
105:(
99:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.