4430:
like this on
Knowledge (XXG) prefer that the image not be listed twice in both the main category and the subcategory and in some cases the sub sub category as it makes it appears as though there are more images needed than there are. Also, most of the people that do the tagging don't "know" what county category they go in, they just tag it for Idaho and keep moving so then someone would need to know what county it belongs in and then adjust it. In most cases that means someone has to go to each individual article where an image was needed and manually verify it. I would also note that not every state does it like this. Some have only a couple categories (like for people) some have over a hundred. Most of the state projects that have the county sub pcat system at least partially use it but it is a very time taking process and it requires a knowedge of the template syntax that most don't have so they just say the state (in this case Idaho) and someone else has to adjust it to be more precise. I will also go back and tag all the subcats.
1686:. The statement "unless a discussion at the article talkpage itself determined that sources treated it as a dissenting organization" makes me feel deeply uneasy and has made up my mind on the question. I am now for a "strong oppose". The statement could be taken to mean that the talk page is the arbitor of RC orthodoxy. It's not the function of Wiki to act as ecclesiastical court. The ACP self defines as RC. Their detractors cal them "dissenting voices". The ACP rejects these claims; who's to gainsay them? Is the ACP to be consigned to the marginals/crazies/dissidents sub-cats because of the propaganda of a few enemies? Unless there is an absolute excommunication by the Vatican, they may be presumed to be in good standing. So any sub-cat that purported to say otherwise would contract this working assumption and would indeed enter murky waters. Let's not go there.
973:. But "Category:Organizations of Catholics" is far too wide-ranging. It would include, for instance, any baseball or football team whose members are Catholics. The Catholic Church indicates that what it calls "associations of the Christian faithful" (i.e., associations in which Catholics "strive in a common endeavour to foster a more perfect life, to promote public worship or Christian doctrine, or to exercise other works of the apostolate such as initiatives of evangelization, works of piety or charity, and those which animate the temporal order with a Christian spirit") do not have to be in any sense "official": some are erected by Church authority, some are praised or commended by Church authority, but some are freely established by Catholics themselves by private agreement among themselves (
1889:
more of the so-called
Eastern Rite churches. There are, of course, some groups which contain members from all the rites, and I'm not entirely sure how to deal with all of them, but I do think it makes good sense to allow some articles which are directly relevant to only one or a small number of the groups in full communion with each other, with their archbishops or patriarchs among the voters for the Pope (which I think they all are?). Having said that, "Latin Rite Catholic Church organizations" is a longer term and possibly more confusing to some than "Roman Catholic Church organizations," and organizations only relevant to the Maronite Church or the Melkite Church, for example, would most reasonably be included in subcategories for those particular groups.
1113:" is a straw man. It is easy to provide evidence that an organization's existence and identification is in accordance with the views of the Catholic Church, and Canon Law would only come into play if there were a question of whether the organization was heretical or anti-Catholic. You are dismissing the Catholic Press, the decrees of the Vatican and Bishops, the activities of the organizations, (do they in some way openly cooperate with the Catholic Church, for instance, meeting in Churches, etc.) which are all readily searchable and Verifiable, as WP:OR. They are not. WP:RS takes into account context and how authoritative the sources are, and
2088:
swath of the readership of
Knowledge (XXG) would simply look up "Catholic", and expect Roman Catholic and Eastern Catholic, there are also groups outside of that Communion that call themselves Catholic. Do you really want the top category to include on the same level and in the same category, for instance, Friends of Pope Michael, which they would not want or expect to see, and the Society of St Vincent de Paul? Because we do not live in an ideal world, where common sense would argue against such a thing, before we change to Catholic Church organizations, shouldn't a description and limitation of the category be written FIRST?--
1927:
Churches that ARE in union with Rome. I think the issue that has wide appeal is NOT to include the first two categories, but to definitely include the latter. Maronite, Malachite, Syro-Malabar, Syro-Malankar, Chaldean, Ambrosian, and the Uniate Coptic, Eastern, and
Anglican use communities all are in union, but do not use the Roman Missal, and do not use the term Roman Catholic to describe themselves. The challenge is to come up with a phrasing to include all them, but not just make the (now) Roman Catholic category include non-Catholic or questionably Catholic organizations. Hope that helps.--
1213:, that might be helpful, since that no longer would require that the Catholic Church self-identify. It is destructive to change the useful category to something too vague, and which then allows ANY organization which decides to self-identify (even if not Catholic) as Catholic to be called Catholic. The new category would include every sports team of every Irish college, the guy in Kansas who lives in his mother's basement and has declared himself Pope, and is NOT what people would go to the category to find. Sub-categories do NOT need to destroy the original category. We could add
480:. This would include organizations of self-identified Catholics who are identified by reliable sources, eg. mainstream newspapers and academic books, as publicly dissenting against Catholic Faith (as in the Catechism) or Catholic discipline (as in the Canon Law), as long as the dissenting persists and has generated significant coverage. The threshold of coverage to include an organization in this subcat will be decided on a case-by-case basis. This shouldn't generate controversy, because dissenting organizations are often proud of their dissent.
977:"Organizations of Catholics" is also much wider than the notion of "Catholic organization", with which Roscelese links the proposal (above). With regard to this term, "Catholic organization", the Catholic Church's rule for its members is: "No association is to assume the name Catholic without the consent of competent ecclesiastical authority" (canon 300). Additional query: Would "Catholic Church organizations" perhaps be an appropriate category? It would at least be more clearly defined than the extremely wide "Organizations of Catholics".
2040:
simple unambiguous adjective that encompasses Roman
Catholics, Syro-Malabar Catholics, and Byzantine Catholics alike. There is no reason I see to muddy the waters by using "Roman" or "Uniate" or "Latin Rite" (which is also an incorrect term; we would use "Roman Rite" or "Latin Church") If you use categories named simply "Catholic" then you will easily encompass all 23 Churches in communion with Rome and exclude those that are not. There is no reason to tack on unnecessary identifiers to narrow the field or muddy the waters here.
3385:
and it could include individuals for which we have sources that just say they died of undifferentiated plague. In this case it is not a case of us lumping together a now-discredited disease category into one that is medically accurate. The gout and apoplexy examples are cases where historically the diseases were given very broad definitions which in retrospect were not terribly accurate or precise, and today we have medically narrowed them down. However, this is an example of a historically
2830:
2826:
1742:
bishops that he perceives as lukewarm or unfaithful, but it is a good sign that he has chosen to be obedient in this matter. It has been suggested that the objection to his use of the term "Catholic" may have come about merely because he never sought express permission for it in the first place. At any rate, it also speaks to the visibility and influence of that apostolate; it is only after gaining notoriety that you will find yourself censured in some way by your bishop.
607:- I believe it is reasonable to ensure that those organizations which are included in a category referring to the "Roman Catholic Church" should be only those which are in some way officially affiliated with that body. That particular name is, more or less, an equivalent term to "US government". I cannot see any groups opposed to the US Government being included in such categories, given the confusion that would cause, and I can't see why this should be any different.
2822:
2138:
accept the authority of the Pope, and if you are going to use
Catholic to describe any group after 1869 that does not accept the authority of the Pope you need to use some modifier with it. This is the only method of dealing with termonology that recognizes the reality of English usage. Before 1870 the issue is trickier, but from 1870 on it is clear that accepting the authority of the Pope is essential to actually being Catholic.
1831:
with the Bishop of Rome is part of the Roman
Catholic Church. There is not a higher order or parent above the Roman Catholic Church that is somehow mystically part of the worldwide Catholic Church but not part of the Roman Catholic Church. The logical parents for the cat "Roman Catholic Church" is "Christian Churches". Another logical parent is those who used to be Roman Catholic but are no longer so; this cat already exists -
1140:- I've just come across this category myself, and I'm surprised we haven't split it a long time ago. It clearly makes sense to distinguish between organisations of Catholics and officially recognised Catholic Church organisations, and a category for 'dissident Catholic organisations' is probably a good idea as well, as long as reliable sources are used to identify them. Obvious solution to a longstanding problem.
225:, which says that references do not have to be easy for everyone to access. I use lots of subscription-required references, because those are often the highest-quality references available for a particular fact. I shudder to think of the damage a well-meaning editor might do in attempting to clear these two backlogs, replacing high-quality citations with less-reliable, less-informative, but easy-to-access sources.
586:, which have come into conflict with the RCC hierarchy, should be categorized as Catholic organizations. Some users opposed their inclusion, but removing them entirely from Catholic-related categories makes it difficult for users to find them. The proposal would make sure that all groups identifying as Catholic can be found somewhere in the category tree of organizations of Roman Catholics. –
3549:
Even so, I think that as understanding of the past evolves, so should our categorization. One could argue that, by doing so, we deviate from the source material; however, I consider this to be an organizational decision rather than original synthesis. After all, whereas it is true that all deaths from bubonic plague are deaths from plague, all plague deaths are not from bubonic plague.
3467:
921:, are groups organized by and/or for the Catholic laity. The one thing I think would be required for the category you propose is that the name would seem to at least strongly imply that the organizations are, in fact, primarily made up of Catholics of some sort or other. That might include organizations of former Catholics, as well as, potentially, organizations of
1604:, the Catholic Church doesn't distinguish between lay and clerical organizations, and some have members that belong to both. Also - the category should specifically identify for inclusion only those organizations listed by the Catholic church as Catholic. Anyone can claim that they are affiliated with the Catholic church, that doesn't make it so.
251:; as increasing numbers of newspaper & trade press sites now require registration, those tags could be placed on vast numbers of citations, and as stated above there is often nothing good to be done about it. (I see that one is empty already, so someone much have changed the template without waiting for this discussion to end.) –
1835:. In conclusion, unless a self-identifying Roman Catholic individual, order, society, bishop or cardinal is in the latter category, he may be presumed to be in the "Roman Catholic" category. To say otherwise is to abrogate powers of discernment, theology and judgement to Wiki that it does not have and should not have.
992:
your use of the associations of the faithful as criteria for inclusion in a broad, non-diffused category; for some of those we have affirmative sourcing that they've been recognized as such, but for the ones where we don't, we can't just assume without any sourcing that they belong based on canon law, because that's
1701:
made here or on a category talkpage. I don't think standing (wrt excommunication or not) is really the issue addressed by the proposed dissenting subcategory, but if you think the wording is unclear or suggests something incorrect, it'd be great if you'd suggest alternate wording. Does this address your concerns? –
1557:? It's not a lay organisation so the Lay sub-cat won't do. It's not an order or society. It's not sanctioned by the Vatican so it's not "official". But they are priests in good standing. Would a new category for "Dissenting voices" have to be created for it? In the current schema, it's just a RC organisation.
641:
CMRI call themselves
Catholic, but are not, for very different reasons; should people be able to find them somewhere if they search the general category? Yes, but there should be a distinction, and the destruction of the existing category is not necessary. I would highly recommend the creation of the Category
2117:
I have no strong views about this, but I thought that I had been told in the past that WP had decided that the correct term for churches in communion with Rome was "Catholic". "Roman
Catholic" has been adopted in UK as a distinction from "Anglo-Catholic", a wing of the Anglican Church. Accordingly,
1830:
etc. All these rites are compatible with the Roman
Catholic Church, although in the case of the Byzantine rite, it is mostly used by the Eastern Orthodox churches not in communion with the Bishop of Rome. The essential point here is that any individual, order, society, bishop or cardinal in communion
1775:
The idea being to allow for the non-Roman organisations to be more correctly categorised. (Which appears to have decent consensual support above.) As the discussions are ongoing, this will give the ability for editors to start upmerging those articles and cats which don't directly belong under Roman.
1741:
It is an interesting observation, which might speak to the obedience of an organization that takes the trouble to rebrand itself after a single bishop raised the issue, especially after Voris contended that he might not be under the jurisdiction of that bishop. Voris has been known for standing up to
228:
There is value in checking paywall sources to see if the exact same content is available elsewhere for free, but these categories are of little use for that purpose, since there's no way to mark which references have already been checked. Basically, a backlog that can never be emptied is not a useful
4501:
As there are less than 200 articles in the state category, it is easy to review this list. Having to click down to each county sub-category is not productive. The map articles function at the head of the state page helps locate requests near a reviewer, not need for county organisation in this case.
4429:
To answer a couple of the questions. Yes the ctegories are populated by a couple templates. Some of the WikiProject banners includeing WPUS populate it as does Template:Image needed and I think a couple of others. The folks who more or less run the image tagging and maintenance aspect of image stuff
1903:
Hi, John C. Actually, I don't see the need to distinguish within the existing category, just to make it more specific as to inclusion. "Roman Catholic (and Uniate)" would be sufficient. Any organization that fits that description would be open to anyone who is Roman Catholic or Uniate, although some
1510:
My first comment was in reference to - say - an organization aimed at prosecuting, or advocating for the victims of, Catholic Church sexual abuse, but which was not made up primarily of Catholics and did not identify itself as a Catholic organization. Or perhaps an organization whose relationship to
1479:
is such-n-such organisation "related" to the Catholic Church? Through dissent? Through agreement? How many degrees of dissent does an organisation need to be dissenting? How many degrees must an organisation need to be agreeing? How do we determine "official"? Is it because it has the sponsorship of
1395:
CC-related organizations could also work instead of "organizations of Catholics" (the intended parent category), but I worry that it would seem to include organizations whose activities are related to the RCC but whose membership or identification is not Catholic. Perhaps, however, these worries are
991:
Your proposal doesn't change in any way the problem that this proposal is trying to solve, though. I and other users agree that "(Roman) Catholic Church organizations" says or connotes that the organizations are official, but that's not the case with the groups we're trying to categorize. I question
2137:
Attempts to pretend that Catholic can be logically used to link those who accept the authority of the Pope and those who reject his authority in any other coherent system is in the end an attempt to twist the term from its actual meaning in spoken English. In english usage Catholic means those who
1926:
Hi, Laurel Lodged; I understand both points, perhaps a re-phrasing is in order. It is important that we distinguish, as you have said, between i) Organizations that loosely use the term Catholic, ii) that use the term Catholic, but which are not in communion with Rome, and iii) those many component
1700:
Talkpage discussion certainly would not be based on personal opinion, but rather on the sources about that topic (and not just sources reporting that the group's been criticized by the church hierarchy). I specified the article talkpage in order to clarify that such a decision would probably not be
1357:
Also, slight problem with change of Roman Catholic to Catholic, rather than the more specific Roman (or Uniate) Catholic. Catholic could mean any number of religious groups. For instance, you could argue that Catholic WomenPriests , while not Roman Catholic, is Catholic of a kind (though they never
1295:
organizations that have been officially recognized would leave even more articles uncategorized and make the readers' task even more difficult. Your scaremongering slippery-slope argument about people categorizing the Nazi Party or college sports teams in this category is unconvincing, and does not
1154:
I think there is definitely consensus that 1) Subcategorization would be good, 2) use of the term "Roman Catholic" should be expanded to include Uniate (the official term) Catholics, and that 3) a category of Dissident Catholic organizations or Organizations of dissident Catholics (I think once you
939:
Yeah, that (making clear on the page what defines inclusion) is the plan. In my view, "Organizations of Catholics" would be a top-level category for any Catholic organization, while more specific subcategories (like Old Catholics, Catholics in political disagreement, official church projects, etc.)
640:
Well, not quite. A group that exists and is affiliated with the Catholic Church, but which does not have any "official" approval at the present would probably be included IF its inclusion were non-controversial. You are talking about groups for which their Catholicity IS controversial. Both CFC and
563:
Is it my imagination or is this a cover for smothering voices that disagree with some rule of the RC Church? Is this an attempt to pigeon-hole all those that engage in debate or theological inquiry? Those theologians in the Curia that engage in the same debate and inquiry may then assume the mantle
3548:
I have no clear answer to BHG's question about whether the categories are primarily medical or historical. Plague is not so common nowadays that it claims the lives of large numbers of notable people (i.e., who have or might have articles), so there is a sense that these categories are historical.
3384:
type of plague. So the proposal would only be making the category broader—it could include any individuals for which we have sources that say they died of bubonic plague, and it could also include individuals for which we have sources that say they died of one of the two other two types of plague,
2039:
to show that Eastern Catholics do not necessarily enjoy being called Roman Catholics. Also, "Uniate" is a derogatory term now for the past several decades. I do not know any self-respecting Eastern Catholic who would call himself a Uniate. The correct term for these people is "Catholic". This is a
1472:
It sounds like you re looking for organisations which have catholic members, as opposed to those who don't. And looking for organisations which are catholic-related in some way, as opposed to those who are not. If so, that's a problem because tying together those strands of connection can be very
1888:
Jc37 has a point here. We do have some good reasonable cause to want to differentiate between groups which may well exist, or have existed, within the Latin rite Roman Catholic church exclusively and, perhaps, other groups which, for whatever reason, might only exist or have existed within one or
2233:
There is general sentiment that we should have a category that includes the WHOLE of the Catholic Church, including organizations OF the Roman and Eastern Catholic Churches, and that if we can AVOID confusion, making Catholic the top category is fine, as long as we make sure to NOT include small
2087:
More than happy to defer to you both and gleefully call all Roman Catholic, Eastern Rite Catholics, and their legitimate organizations simply Catholic Church organizations. Problem is, we have a problem, separate from the issue of the many Rites within the purview of the Pontiff. Although a vast
2576:
in Oxfordshire, England. Informal areas with imprecise boundaries make for very poor categories, because their inclusion criteria are either subjective or arbitrary ... and in this case, the head article appears to have no references in reliable sources to justify its existence. Regardless of
2021:
Hi, Esoglu; that is to some extent the point that I was making. The third category I referred to, "many component Churches that ARE in union with Rome" are the list that I then used. They ARE in union with Rome, part of the Roman Catholic communion, they just don't usually use the words "Roman
1959:
Hi, Laurel; all of the communities I listed ARE in union with Rome, and CAN be described as RC, it is just that THEY do not use the words "Roman Catholic" to describe their union. The proper term is "Uniate". They have Bishops that are parallel to the Territorial Roman Rite Bishops, and have a
1618:
A lot of people seem to be harping on "lay." I've replaced it with "unofficial" in the proposal, since that is the actual intent - the parent category would encompass all Catholic organizations, with those set up by the church hierarchy as a subcat. Can you explain how you propose to deal with
3551:
I find Lenticel's suggestion to be intriguing: nothing prevents us, in principle, from categorizing deaths from bubonic plague as a subset of plague deaths in general. In my opinion, neither one would need subdivision by century—the combined use of one category for deaths by cause and another
277:(emphasis on the first only). Such a category would allow us to identify articles that rely exclusively on paywall material, and seek out more democratically accessible alternatives where available. I do think we should make an effort to utilize accessible sources, all other factors the same.
1396:
as baseless as the worries that "organizations of Catholics" would include baseball teams with a lot of Hispanic players or fascist parties that don't specifically identify as Catholic. Can you elaborate on your concerns about broadness? (CC orgs, etc. is, as I and other users have said, too
3271:
infection. Although it has been traditional to assume that anyone who died of plague died of "bubonic" plague (the most common of the three types), that assumption has been questioned in more modern times. When dealing with historical deaths, it is difficult to determine with certainty what
1945:. This is because they are not in communion with the Holy See and so do not self-identify as RC. The problem before us, as I see it, is limited to those people and organisations that self-identify as RC and how to sub-categogise them (or indeed whther they should be sub-categorised at all).
4343:
In addition to the one I have nominated here I also recommend deleting the following group of categories. These categories were made to try and better organize the images needed for articles relating to Idaho by county but most are empty and probably always will be. In my opinion this over
3958:
The subject category seems to have been emptied out of process; the target category only contains a single article which I think is miscategorized, and the US Navy bands category, which in comparison to its Army counterpart is already properly categorized without this "music" category.
698:
As defined by the Church itself, a (Catholic) lay society is one that is not clerical, clerical ones being those that "are under the direction of clerics, assume the exercise of sacred orders, and are recognized as such by competent authority" (Code of Canon Law, canon 302). See also
1285:
organizations (no implication of unofficial ones that have been identified as Catholic), leaving all others high and dry. A category with those criteria would be preserved under a clearer name. It would just be a subcategory of a larger category. I'm also not sure you understand what
2193:
categories are meant to use words in a way that reflects their meaning in actual use, not their etymology. The word Catholic in actual English usage refers to the Roman Catholic Church, members of that Church and so forth. In real English usage it does not mean "universal" in most
4404:. If I was in Idaho and was looking for photographic gaps to fill in my area, then I would find the by-counties very useful in identifying locations near me. So I like the principle of the scheme, and the fact that it is being underused for now seems to me to no reason to delete it.
2862:- I know it looks odd, but 'Marxian' is the adjective used in economics rather than 'Marxist'. (Whether there is any difference between 'Marxist economics' and 'Marxian economics' is not a question that can be resolved in this CFD, but the latter is the preferred term.)
2234:
groups that use the term, but are not in communion, probably with a restrictive description of the Category. That does NOT mean that scrapping the category in favor of a category of orgs TO WHICH some fraction of Catholics belong is positive or supported by any.--
1030:
of the organization should indicate a connection with the category, but even then he wrote: "The one thing I think would be required for the category you propose is that the name would seem to at least strongly imply that the organizations are, in fact, primarily
3347:, then surely they should capture either a) the historic significance attached to what has been labelled for the last centuries as "bubonic plague", and will be the term used in most sources; or, b) the much more varied terminology used in contemporary accounts.
1776:
If it turns out in the end that this doesn't have consensus, it would be a simple matter to re-merge this category. But at least this would help start a way forward. I welcome thoughts on this, and please feel free to start re-categorising as appropriate. -
1173:
As I explain both above and below, nothing will be lost or destroyed here, except confusion and ambiguity. The existing category (most likely under a better name) would simply be joined by more categories that would allow us to better organize our articles.
1263:. The Nazis were not a Catholic Organization. Clear exclusion from the Category. There were Catholics that were Nazis, and reductio ad Hitlerum for the war years is still present. The new proposed general Category is open to abuse, and unnecessary abuse. --
717:
I'm aware of the formal definition, yes, but there are a number of articles in it that don't seem to fit that definition (and thus I wondered if a previous definition had established, for WP use, a broader definition for inclusion). I was wondering if
3522:
is what helped clinch it for me. We simply have no real way (on Knowledge (XXG) at least) to go into the past with modern technology to find out which version of "the plague" someone had. And since we're also bound to using references and not our own
621:
That was what prompted the discussion, but the problem is broader: as you say, the current title implies that all contained groups are officially affiliated, but that's not the case even with many groups that haven't been criticized by the hierarchy.
379:: I'm reminded that this never happened after the compromise proposal last year (there were a few users in support and one in opposition, no real consensus either way) so hopefully this will generate more interest. The complete proposal can be read
1290:
which identifies. Within the category scheme we have proposed, it could also be possible to subcategorize organizations singled out as Catholic by the church hierarchy, if properly sourced; but your proposal to include in the whole category scheme
4519:
deletion after upmerging the three articles in these categories. No objection to recreation when the parent category grows so large that navigation is affected. Subcategories can then be created if there are ample articles to populate them.
4344:
categorization actually makes things more difficult to track the images needed for Idaho related articles. It takes a lot of time to identify them and add them to the category and even then each category would likely only have a couple in it.
3541:
per nom. While the proposed change results in a loss of specificity, it more than compensates for this loss by improving accuracy. Many categorized articles do not mention bubonic plague specifically, attributing death to "plague" or the
1515:
to the Catholic Church, but it's not what we're trying to categorize here. However, as I said, this worry may be unnecessary, and CC-related organizations may be a perfectly fine name, especially if we clarify in category text what it is
380:
2022:
Catholic" to describe themselves (with the exception of the Milanese). I did not want that proper terminology (aka including the words "and Uniate") to be confused with adding in groups that clearly do NOT belong (aka groups i and ii)--
2936:. This matches the current structure of other categories for TV WikiProject task forces. If the task force categories should be renamed, there should be a consensus gathered for renaming all of them, rather than singling this one out.
1984:. Your claim that, for instance, Maronites do not call themselves Roman Catholics is unfounded and, perhaps more important in Knowledge (XXG), is unsourced; in fact, they are reported to be proud to call themselves Roman Catholics (
1323:
as it currently stands. - Some of these suggestions are going to lead to some very broad categories due to ambiguities (some of which are noted in the discussion above). For example, I think the proposed parent might be better named
3342:
However, my immediate concern is a little narrower, and it relates to what these categories are for. Briefly, if these categories are primarily medical, then there is a good case for following the latest research; but if they are
2258:. With organisations as large as these churches, references should come easy to support your view. After all, our guidelines are that we generally name categories based upon what they call themselves, and what they are called in
1519:
As we say in the proposal, organizations would be in the parent category by default. Affirmative sourcing (with a conversation on the talk page to determine what is sufficient) would be necessary to place it in a subcategory.
1353:
Curious; why a list and not a Category? Could certainly subcategorize Dissenting groups as to issue, such as Vatican II, Vatican I, Sedevacantism, Women's Ordination, Abortion, Governance, Parish Closings, Abuse Oversight,
1788:
Could you and the other users concerned with Roman vs. non-Roman make sure to add appropriate notes to the categories, to make sure that nothing is improperly categorized? (eg. RCC stuff under CC if that's not the intent)
3451:- "Plague (disease)" is ambiguous; "plague" is used to describe generically any number of infectious diseases in ye olden days when medicine was at the "let's drill a hole in his skull" level; it may or may not refer to
3393:
class of disease that is also still recognized. And we do have articles about people who verifiably died from the pneumonic and septicemic varieties. Do we really want to break these ones out into separate categories?
722:
category would be useful to consider in the category scheme, for lay orgs, but it seems that the better solution would be to continue with the current proposal and simply remove improper entries from the lay socs cat.
221:. They are maintenance categories, implying that efforts should be made to empty them, which would mean removing all references to sites that require registration or a subscription. This is in clear contradiction of
4213:
2340:- There seems to essentially be agreement on how the final product should look. So while going with FL's structural final version, going with BHG's plan of action if only because it keeps the edit history intact. -
4268:
780:
category tree, which uses "Roman Catholic orgs by century," etc. What solution would you propose? Would it work if the proposal was the same with the exception of substituting "Catholic" for "Roman Catholic"?
3379:
I can see your point, and agree that it could be a concern, especially with the by-century subcategories. I think I would largely agree but for one point: bubonic plague is—medically speaking—simply a more
3357:) -- and that broad meaning of "apoplexy" survived well into the 19th century. How should the category system deal with all this? Can it accommodate it without some degree of anachronism or synthesis? --
3002:. This is a project categorization, not a content categorization. Since there are many "hero task forces" in comics fiction, mythology and legend, the suggested target is ambiguous, so should be renamed.
4123:
3322:
I don't think that there is an easy answer to this, because while our policies are very clear, the application of contemporary scientific analysis clashes directly with several of our core policies.
996:. That would continue to leave many organizations without an important container category. And lastly, I think it's obvious that "organizations of Catholics" would not encompass a sports team that
3330:, is one of the fundamental requirements for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG)" (emphasis in original), but in this case the proposal is to dump verifiabilty in favour of a scientific version of truth.
1035:" (emphasis added). There are many organizations officially recognized by the Church (and surely these should be included?) whose names in no way indicate a connection with Catholicism: take "
899:
Would you also support the "organizations of Catholics" language, as proposed above, for a top-level category, with subcategories for official, conflicting or dissenting, etc. as appropriate? –
485:
Affirmative sourcing will be necessary to include an organization either in the "official" category or in the "dissenting" category. Such sourcing being absent, the organization will remain in
758:
Churches in communion with Rome, and some members of 22 of those Churches would strongly object to being called "Roman Catholic" because this has the connotation of being associated with the
1109:
I think the argument that the category inclusion needs to be so extraordinarily broad because "we can't just assume without any sourcing that they belong based on canon law, because that's
1727:
about an organization that removed the word "Catholic" from its name "after a dispute with the Archdiocese of Detroit about its right to use the term under canon law" may be of interest.
1358:
reveal their Apostolic bona fides - for arguments sake lets put that aside), but also a Dissenting Catholic organizations, since it is at least 60% protest at the Roman Catholic Church. --
4406:
I presume that these categories are being populated via a template, so why not tweak the template so that articles are added both to the by-county categories and an all-Idaho category? --
925:. I think it would make sense if the category itself contained a clear statement on the category page as to what exactly qualifies an organization for inclusion in one of the categories.
3546:, which saw the bubonic, pneumonic and septicemic forms. Although the bubonic form is the most infamous, we cannot assume that any historical plague death was a result of bubonic plague.
3316:. According to our policies, that is undoubtedly how they should remain categorised, because re-labelling them on the basis of generalised research centuries later is a blatant form of
3514:(and after that I merely say "per nom"? Say it isn't so! : ) - Kidding aside, while I agree that "plague" can be a broader term, I think other words are more used these days for such
179:
3093:. While I agree that the whole task force/work group structures (not just the television ones) should be discussed, I don't think we should single out just this one in this case. -
3276:
of plague someone died of. For that reason, it's best to have a category that groups all deaths from plague rather than one that singles out bubonic plague. The parent category is
1579:, unless a discussion at the article talkpage itself determined that sources treated it as a dissenting organization, in which case it would go in the proposed dissenting subcat. –
42:
37:
1459:. Perhaps, however, these worries are as baseless as the worries that "organizations of Catholics" would include baseball teams with a lot of Hispanic players or fascist parties
2744:: I had never in my life heard of "Marxian" before a couple of days ago. Using AWB and category recursive to three levels, there are three articles with "Marxian" in the name:
4051:
885:
or some such similar title would be both less ambiguous and I believe a better description for groups of Catholics who in some way oppose the "power structure" of the Church.
564:
of "official", thereby consigning the others to unofficial, second-rate and possibly heretical? Debate is debate. Inquiry is inquiry. Should Wiki aid and abet Curial purges?
3236:
3224:
3212:
3200:
1084:
171:
1864:. So yes, while certain Catholic churches may (or may not) be in communion with each other, and while they may recognise papal authority, the others are not necessarily
1338:
they are dissident. There isn't just a single issue or even group of issues which unites such organisations. Another way to do what I think is the intent here might be:
438:
162:
2362:
754:
without setting up a parallel heirarchy with which to categorize Eastern Catholic organizations of the same type. The "Roman Catholic Church" is a communion of 23
467:. This category would include only official organizations. The Catholic League for example would be excluded - they may not be dissident, but they are unofficial.
4328:
4318:
4198:
4163:
4090:
4082:
1877:
which show otherwise. (And no, I'm not interested in re-fighting the crusades, nor in the arguments of various church historians regarding Peter and James : )-
4283:
4238:
4138:
141:
4308:
4278:
4248:
4168:
4298:
4273:
4228:
4218:
4183:
4148:
4143:
4133:
2423:
2393:
1769:
1329:
434:
369:
4323:
4293:
4288:
4243:
4208:
4203:
4188:
4158:
4153:
1088:
4313:
4303:
4263:
4258:
4253:
4233:
4193:
4178:
4173:
4128:
4073:
3589:
By the way, I share The Bushranger's dislike of "plague (disease)", but I think that any related change would need to begin at the article's talk page. --
3090:
4223:
274:
133:
2604:
21:
4379:. AFAICS, none of the categories whose talk pages are listed in the collapsed box has been tagged, so they should not be changed by this discussion. --
3353:" to be used as a generic term for what medicine now sees as a wide range of diseases, whilst a range of rapid deaths were labelled as "apoplexy" (see
232:
We could simply remove the backlog notice and instructions to empty the categories, but then I see no remaining reason for these categories to exist.
124:
3063:
3038:
882:
387:
unofficial organizations (like the Catholic League) which are currently mixed in the category, without leaving either sans a container category. –
3437:. We might be able to sift the verified bubonic plague cases and put them to the daughter cat while the unclear ones stays with the parent cat --
1832:
1155:
agree that they are "dissident", also adding that they are not "official" is redundant) would be a good addition, and adding it to a category of
383:, but in summary, we aim to create a category structure that distinguishes between official church organizations (like the Synod of Bishops) and
1241:
to the end, which would almost by definition not need approval of the Church, and could be sorted according to the component orgs' complaint. --
1226:
3167:
2405:
2389:
1765:
1663:
It seems to be fairly comprehensive and it could probably serve as a basis for determining status of at least the numerous groups it mentions.
1325:
256:
1810:
There is no such thing as a Catholic Church organisation that exists outside the Roman Catholic Church. There are many denominations, such as
17:
4418:
4391:
3931:
3762:
3564:
3430:
3369:
3188:
2619:
2589:
2438:
2358:
700:
105:
4484:. The listed categories by my count contain a total of 1 article. The parent has one other subcategory with 8 articles and 119 articles.
3294:. I commend the nominator for a thoughtful and well-reasoned rationale, but I think that this case reveals an undiscussed flaw in the whole
3034:
2600:
4358:
I do recommend leaving the category for people in place. I believe this is an important distinction of articles needed and should be kept.
460:
1976:
Hi, 209.6.69.227. You can be a (Roman) Catholic without using the Roman Missal. For instance, in Milan they do not use it (they use the
3042:
3003:
2802:
2999:
1814:, that self-identify as Catholic; they would not, however, claim to be in communion with the Bishop of Rome. Similarly, there are many
1218:
3232:
3220:
3208:
3196:
2235:
2089:
2023:
1961:
1928:
1905:
1359:
1264:
1242:
1160:
1118:
650:
447:
1222:
1339:
1209:
it defines the component articles as orgs the Catholic Church self-identifies as Catholic. If someone wanted to add a new Category,
970:
503:
473:
451:
1724:
1419:
1857:
2995:
2818:
2212:
currently have a category structure that allows us to categorize organizations related to or made up of members of the church. –
2221:
1798:
1710:
1632:
1619:
Catholic organizations whose endorsement by the hierarchy cannot be sourced? They're not all dissident, and removing them from
1588:
1572:
1554:
1529:
1442:
1409:
1332:, which I suppose could presumably become a subcat.) Also, dissident organisations should be a list not a category, so to note
1305:
1183:
1156:
1066:
1009:
949:
908:
865:
822:
790:
732:
689:
677:
631:
595:
547:
529:
396:
3888:
2577:
whether the head article is kept, a category for a vague and informal geographical area seems to be misleading to readers. --
1202:
1079:
name (not the organization's) to indicate only that the organizations are "primarily" made up of Catholics, not that they are
1000:
to have a lot of Catholics (but it would - and should - encompass a Catholic equivalent of Maccabi or Athletes in Action!). –
215:
205:
4502:
If the state category gets large, as is the situation with some states, then some county sub-categories can be recreated. --
3086:
3017:
2933:
2118:
the policy should be to rename RC to "Catholic", except where there is a good reason for retaining the adjective "Roman".
3717:
1214:
646:
3575:
3560:
3434:
3184:
1576:
486:
477:
464:
430:
3295:
4549:
4035:
4007:
3854:
3826:
3645:
3617:
3463:
as "bubonic plague" (even though, IIRC, the other two kinds are even nastier - septicemic plague can kill within a day
3147:
3119:
2919:
2891:
2692:
2664:
2491:
2463:
2325:
2297:
1860:, for just one example.) The Pope is (as has been the tradition for well over a thousand years from what I understand)
1400:
for a parent cat; other proposals may be broad-sounding but I don't think that in practice they will be problematic.) –
334:
306:
78:
2778:
2730:
2726:
1238:
1210:
1159:
would not be opposed. The contentious part of the proposal is destroying the useful categories that presently exist.--
642:
1281:
inclusion criteria, which is part of the problem. As John Carter points out, it seems to restrict inclusion only to
3173:
2958:
2749:
2411:
1575:
has been noted but it seems that that won't really affect the discussion.) ACP would go in the top-level category,
262:
4529:
4511:
4493:
4476:
4453:
4439:
4396:
4367:
4353:
4060:
3987:
3968:
3950:
3936:
3909:
3876:
3806:
3785:
3767:
3728:
3675:
3595:
3584:
3533:
3506:
3486:
3443:
3417:
3398:
3374:
3284:
3176:
3099:
3077:
3050:
3029:
3011:
2984:
2945:
2871:
2854:
2810:
2787:
2718:
2644:
2624:
2594:
2517:
2443:
2414:
2381:
2346:
2271:
2243:
2225:
2203:
2181:
2147:
2127:
2097:
2082:
2049:
2031:
2016:
1969:
1954:
1936:
1913:
1898:
1883:
1844:
1802:
1782:
1751:
1736:
1714:
1695:
1672:
1654:
1636:
1613:
1592:
1566:
1533:
1505:
1446:
1428:
1413:
1388:
1367:
1348:
1309:
1272:
1250:
1187:
1168:
1149:
1126:
1100:
1070:
1048:
1036:
1013:
986:
953:
934:
912:
894:
869:
851:
826:
808:
794:
771:
736:
712:
693:
658:
635:
616:
599:
573:
551:
533:
515:
400:
358:
286:
265:
241:
110:
3927:
3758:
3365:
3340:
have, since the question of how to apply new scientific research to historical topics has very wide implications.
3277:
2954:
2615:
2585:
2434:
2199:
2171:
I suppose I could point you to all sorts of references for this, but for now, how about our own article on this?
2143:
2058:
1992:
1342:. Also, the word "official" is really problematic in this case. Perhaps the word "sponsored" would be better? -
751:
101:
2825:
are the standard terms in recent economic scholarship for this distinct tradition of economic thought. See also
2535:
3981:
3669:
3480:
3071:
2712:
2511:
842:
the proposal as rewritten today. And I am sure that many Eastern Catholics will thank you for being inclusive.
3687:
3556:
category should more than suffice—but that is probably best left for another nomination. Therefore, I support
1941:
I think that I agree with the above. But I also think that we don't need a new category for those churches in
2396:. Actually, there are only 11 pages, so it doesn't need a bot to assist with the work, especially if you use
2372:
All schools displayed are Secondary schools in North Lanarkshire, the new name therefore is more accurate. --
538:
Fixed. Or rather, per Elizium's suggestion, everything now conforms to that phrasing instead of vice versa. –
3884:
3046:
3007:
2806:
2782:
2123:
1950:
1840:
1691:
1562:
569:
354:
3472:
3460:
2526:
4414:
4387:
2850:
2239:
2093:
2027:
1965:
1932:
1909:
1363:
1268:
1246:
1164:
1122:
654:
3494:- I think everyone has made some excellent points here. (And anytime someone asks what an XfD discussion
4545:
4525:
4507:
4489:
4472:
4031:
4003:
3850:
3822:
3641:
3613:
3163:
3143:
3115:
2941:
2915:
2887:
2688:
2660:
2543:
2487:
2459:
2401:
2321:
2293:
2062:
2004:
2000:
1894:
1668:
1609:
930:
890:
612:
579:
511:
330:
302:
252:
74:
273:: It would be nice to have a category for articles that contain exclusively paywall material. That is,
4407:
4380:
3920:
3873:
3794:
3776:
3751:
3739:
3721:
3705:
3661:
3358:
2753:
2608:
2578:
2427:
2195:
2139:
1485:
1455:"but I worry that it would seem to include organizations whose activities are related to the RCC but
583:
94:
1904:
may predominantly represent one arm of that Communion by heritage, there is no necessary division.--
917:
It would be acceptable. I might prefer a specific subcat of "Catholic lay societies," which, as per
578:
The discussion that prompted this compromise proposal was about whether Catholic organizations like
222:
3977:
3906:
3725:
3665:
3476:
3395:
3281:
3067:
3025:
2980:
2708:
2507:
2217:
2045:
1794:
1747:
1706:
1650:
1628:
1584:
1525:
1438:
1405:
1301:
1179:
1062:
1005:
945:
904:
861:
847:
818:
804:
786:
767:
728:
685:
627:
591:
543:
525:
392:
282:
4449:
4435:
4363:
4349:
3683:
2972:
2397:
1382:
I didn't understand your "for instance" example in relation to the previous. could you clarify? -
3902:
2867:
2377:
2119:
1946:
1942:
1851:
1836:
1687:
1558:
1145:
940:
would all be placed in that category and have more specific criteria for inclusion of articles. –
565:
350:
2036:
4544:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
4002:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
3821:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
3802:
3612:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
3591:
3580:
3262:
3114:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2886:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2846:
2745:
2659:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2640:
2458:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2292:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2078:
2012:
1732:
1096:
1091:
by the Catholic Church, and which has Lutheran, Orthodox, Calvinist and Evangelical members.
1044:
982:
708:
418:
301:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
237:
4030:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
3849:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
3640:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
3142:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2914:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2760:
be a simple speedy nomination, but it seems like somethings afoot here--can anyone clarify? —
2687:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2486:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2320:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1645:
distinguishes between lay and clerical organizations. See Code of Canon Law, canons 327-329.
329:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
4521:
4503:
4485:
4468:
3964:
3309:
3258:
3250:
2937:
2392:, but keep or re-create the old category as a head category, being part of the hierarchy in
1890:
1856:- Actually, AFAIK, the church you are referring to is the Catholic Church. (See the name of
1664:
1605:
1296:
address the (real, rather than hypothetical) concerns the proposal was created to address. –
926:
886:
608:
507:
3317:
1493:
3870:
3413:
3267:
2838:
2774:
2070:
3524:
3349:
This dilemma does not apply only to plague. In 17th-century Britain, it was common for "
3313:
2262:
1874:
1373:
1110:
993:
1985:
1039:". Whatever problem you think your proposal would solve, it seems to create new ones.
3305:
3254:
3021:
2976:
2213:
2041:
1977:
1827:
1823:
1790:
1743:
1702:
1646:
1624:
1580:
1521:
1434:
1401:
1297:
1175:
1058:
1001:
941:
900:
857:
843:
814:
800:
782:
763:
724:
681:
623:
587:
539:
521:
422:
388:
278:
3708:
in category space. There is not one article about the Muslim festivals, but there are
3323:
2400:; just create the new name as a sub-category and go ahead with moving the articles. –
2259:
1871:
1075:
I think your interpretation of John Carter must be right. In that case, he wants the
3945:
3780:
3438:
3312:), and that will be the label applied to the overwhelming majority of these cases in
2863:
2834:
2373:
1141:
922:
1255:
Repeat in isolation, for clarity. You are changing the self-identification from the
4445:
4431:
4359:
4345:
3798:
3571:
the by-cenutry categories (failing that, renaming them as nominated) and, finally,
3455:. While it is indeed true that there are three different kinds of plague caused by
3336:
discussion about the merits of both approaches, and maybe that's the discussion we
3333:
2636:
2569:
2165:
2074:
2008:
1996:
1981:
1728:
1092:
1040:
978:
856:
Great, thanks! Would you mind striking your earlier objection to avoid confusion? –
759:
704:
233:
974:
3389:
category—which is still medically valid, I would emphasise—being placed within a
2572:", which the head article describes as an "informal area" centred on the town of
918:
520:
A slip, perhaps? I doubt there was a reason for it, so I'll bring that in line. –
3960:
3747:
3743:
3713:
3709:
3543:
3301:
1811:
433:
for any religious organization of self-identified Catholics. This will replace
163:
Category:Pages containing links or citations to sites that require registration
3409:
2842:
2761:
2061:
dislike being called Roman Catholics. Not all. Have you read the article on
1819:
1481:
1286:"self-identification" means...as the word would imply, it is the organization
1234:
349:
There does appear to be consensus to allow a "Dissenting" category, though.--
4056:
3529:
3527:, then I think we're also probably stuck with their verbiage of the time. -
3502:
3095:
2342:
2267:
2177:
1879:
1778:
1501:
1424:
1384:
1344:
755:
4024:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
3843:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
3634:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
3136:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2908:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2681:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2480:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2314:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1659:
I note that there is an annual almanac of the Catholic Church published by
323:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
4329:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Washington County, Idaho
4319:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Twin Falls County, Idaho
4199:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Clearwater County, Idaho
4164:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Bonneville County, Idaho
2073:" is fine for all of them. I will not discuss this matter further here.
4284:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Nez Perce County, Idaho
4239:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Jefferson County, Idaho
4139:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Bear Lake County, Idaho
3515:
3354:
2172:
1980:), but they are no less (Roman) Catholics for that, fully members of the
1230:
4309:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Shoshone County, Idaho
4279:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Minidoka County, Idaho
4249:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Kootenai County, Idaho
4214:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Franklin County, Idaho
4169:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Boundary County, Idaho
4299:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Payette County, Idaho
4274:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Madison County, Idaho
4269:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Lincoln County, Idaho
4229:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Gooding County, Idaho
4219:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Fremont County, Idaho
4184:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Caribou County, Idaho
4149:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Bingham County, Idaho
4144:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Benewah County, Idaho
4134:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Bannock County, Idaho
3578:
for those cases where reliable sources specifically use this label. --
2573:
4324:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Valley County, Idaho
4294:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Owyhee County, Idaho
4289:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Oneida County, Idaho
4244:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Jerome County, Idaho
4209:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Elmore County, Idaho
4204:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Custer County, Idaho
4189:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Cassia County, Idaho
4159:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Bonner County, Idaho
4154:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Blaine County, Idaho
2254:- setting aside the question of "real English", my first question is:
1496:
is really looking like the best course of action for these categories.
1201:
At present the Category (which I agree could be improved by making it
649:, but this should be separated from discussion of the main category.--
4314:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Teton County, Idaho
4304:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Power County, Idaho
4264:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Lewis County, Idaho
4259:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Lemhi County, Idaho
4254:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Latah County, Idaho
4234:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Idaho County, Idaho
4194:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Clark County, Idaho
4179:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Camas County, Idaho
4174:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Butte County, Idaho
4129:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Adams County, Idaho
4074:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Adams County, Idaho
4017:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Adams County, Idaho
1499:
But of course, I welcome your thoughts and clarifications on this. -
502:. Why do all of those in the proposal use Roman Catholic except for
1960:
section at the Holy See, called "Eastern Rites" that oversee them.--
4224:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Gem County, Idaho
4124:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Ada County, Idaho
2251:"In real English usage it does not mean "universal" in most cases."
1571:
There is presently no proposal for a lay subcat. (The existence of
1480:
some local church or individual priest? Perhaps because it has the
275:
Category:Pages containing only subscription only links or citations
4444:
All the attached categories have been tagged for CFD per request.
201:
These two categories are auto-populated when a reference contains
3700:. I think this category needs some sort of disambiguation since
3350:
1815:
1511:
Catholics was to persecute them. Its activities are undoubtedly
1489:
1229:(all of which exist, but could use a rename) do a subcategory,
3901:. The contents are currently limited to topics to do with the
3701:
3304:
and other plague epidemics have historically been labelled as
125:
Category:Pages containing subscription only links or citations
60:
Category:Pages containing subscription only links or citations
3064:
Category:WikiProject Television Heroes (TV series) task force
3039:
Category:WikiProject Television Heroes (TV series) task force
883:
Category:Private organizations related to the Catholic Church
3720:, but I think a simple disambiguating term would be better.
2756:(which looks like OR.) Everything else is "Marxist X". This
2164:
Catholic Church's stance. It's how the term is used in the
1833:
Category:People excommunicated by the Roman Catholic Church
1026:
Catholics? John Carter (above) at least required that the
1227:
Roman (or Uniate) Catholic Lay Organizations and Movements
4538:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
3996:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
3815:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
3606:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
3108:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2880:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2653:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2452:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2286:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
295:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2837:
wrote "An essay on Marxian economics" back in 1942, and
425:
for reforming the categories on Catholic organizations.
4098:
4094:
4086:
4078:
4052:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs in Idaho
2551:
2547:
2539:
2531:
1379:
Roman (and Uniate) could all exist as specific subcats.
187:
183:
175:
167:
149:
145:
137:
129:
3035:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) Heroes (TV series) task force
2265:. Not what an individual commenter may self-assert. -
1083:
Catholics. An example of such an organization is the
1053:
I'm pretty sure John Carter is arguing that the name
461:
Category:Official Roman Catholic Church organizations
1991:). And the Popes use "Roman Catholic" to mean all,
4552:). No further edits should be made to this section.
4038:). No further edits should be made to this section.
4010:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3857:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3829:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3648:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3620:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3150:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3122:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2975:
into a task force, and somehow it needs merging. --
2922:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2894:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2695:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2667:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2494:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2466:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2328:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2300:). No further edits should be made to this section.
337:). No further edits should be made to this section.
309:). No further edits should be made to this section.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3237:Category:17th-century deaths from plague (disease)
3225:Category:16th-century deaths from plague (disease)
3213:Category:15th-century deaths from plague (disease)
3201:Category:14th-century deaths from plague (disease)
2422:. Keep the current category as part of the scheme
1457:whose membership or identification is not Catholic
1085:International Union of Guides and Scouts of Europe
3000:Category:WikiProject Television Heroes task force
1999:, in full communion with the Bishop of Rome (see
1623:Catholic category makes them difficult to find. –
1219:Roman (or Uniate) Catholic Clerical Organizations
3233:Category:17th-century deaths from bubonic plague
3221:Category:16th-century deaths from bubonic plague
3209:Category:15th-century deaths from bubonic plague
3197:Category:14th-century deaths from bubonic plague
2003:). Not here but at the Knowledge (XXG) article
813:Fixed. Would you support the current proposal? –
448:Category:Roman Catholic organizations by century
439:Category:Christian organizations by denomination
4467:to reflect the category and not the talk page.
2363:Category:Secondary schools in North Lanarkshire
1223:Roman (or Uniate) Catholic Orders and Societies
1340:Category:Catholic Church-related organizations
971:Category:Dissenting organizations of Catholics
750:to the use of "Roman Catholic" as it excludes
504:Category:Organizations of Catholics by century
474:Category:Dissenting organizations of Catholics
452:Category:Organizations of Catholics by century
2388:OK, rename and make the new one a sub-cat of
1818:within the Roman Catholic Church such as the
1553:How would the proposed schema categorise the
435:Category: Roman Catholic Church organizations
8:
2424:Category:Schools in Scotland by council area
2394:Category:Schools in Scotland by council area
2152:I'm sorry, but that is just false. The word
1770:Category:Roman Catholic Church organizations
1461:that don't specifically identify as Catholic
1420:Category:Organizations with Catholic members
1330:Category:Roman Catholic Church organizations
1277:The original category in fact has extremely
370:Category:Roman Catholic Church organizations
316:Category:Roman Catholic Church organizations
3500:look like, we should point them here : ) -
3091:Category:WikiProject Television task forces
680:but I do not know what defines inclusion. –
4110:
2996:Category:Knowledge (XXG) Heroes task force
1157:Roman (and Uniate) Catholic organizations
1033:made up of Catholics of some sort or other
1018:Are you perhaps confusing an organization
676:: I have become aware of the existence of
405:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion
3889:Category:Music of the United States Navy
3475:seems to be what should be done here. -
2841:was using the term "Marxian economists"
2007:is the place to discuss that question.
1203:Roman (or Uniate) Catholic Organizations
3518:. And having the disambiguating phrase
2568:. This is a geographical category for "
2426:, but feel free to create a sub-cat. --
3464:
3087:Category:Heroes (TV series) task force
3018:Category:Heroes (TV series) task force
2934:Category:Heroes (TV series) task force
2390:Category:Secondary schools in Scotland
2001:Roman Catholic (term)#Papal references
1766:Category:Catholic Church organizations
1760:Category:Catholic Church organizations
1484:of a bishop? Approval of a particular
1418:What it sounds like you then want is:
1326:Category:Catholic Church organizations
3565:Category:Deaths from plague (disease)
3431:Category:Deaths from plague (disease)
3189:Category:Deaths from plague (disease)
2359:Category:Schools in North Lanarkshire
2307:Category:Schools in North Lanarkshire
701:Roman Catholic lay ecclesial movement
7:
3718:Category:Eid al-Adha and Eid ul-Fitr
2635:per nom; there'd be no end to this.
2231:Again, confusing two separate issues
1215:Roman (or Uniate) Catholic Hierarchy
776:So you must be unsatisfied with the
647:Organizations of Dissident Catholics
3576:Category:Deaths from bubonic plague
3561:Category:Deaths from bubonic plague
3435:Category:Deaths from bubonic plague
3185:Category:Deaths from bubonic plague
3129:Category:Deaths from bubonic plague
2173:Catholic#Use_by_the_Catholic_Church
1577:Category:Organizations of Catholics
1451:Then please clarify your comments:
975:Code of Canon Law, canons 298-299).
487:Category:Organizations of Catholics
478:Category:Organizations of Catholics
465:Category:Organizations of Catholics
431:Category:Organizations of Catholics
3704:is ambiguous, and we already have
1117:, these are especially reliable.--
1115:with respect to Catholic identity'
28:
4045:The result of the discussion was:
3864:The result of the discussion was:
3655:The result of the discussion was:
3459:, the fact is that all three are
3332:We could have a very interesting
3157:The result of the discussion was:
2929:The result of the discussion was:
2702:The result of the discussion was:
2501:The result of the discussion was:
2335:The result of the discussion was:
1870:of the RCC. That said, I welcome
344:The result of the discussion was:
88:The result of the discussion was:
3465:
2065:? "Uniate" is a term that they
1239:Dissident Catholic organizations
1211:Dissident Catholic Organizations
1057:must satisfy that requirement. –
643:Dissident Catholic organizations
271:Delete and create a new category
1986:Catholic Encyclopedia, article
1573:Category:Catholic lay societies
1555:Association of Catholic Priests
678:Category:Catholic lay societies
3750:could be created if needed. --
1022:Catholics with an association
1:
2160:. And that has long been the
1372:Because it opens the door to
1328:. (Which matches the current
1237:to the last, and finally add
30:
3328:Verifiability, and not truth
2971:. I have recently converted
1492:? This is just a mess, and
1037:Worldwide Marriage Encounter
3408:to the less specific name.
3355:Apoplexy#Historical_meaning
2955:Category:WikiProject Heroes
2901:Category:WikiProject Heroes
2731:Category:Marxian economists
2727:Category:Marxist economists
2674:Category:Marxist economists
4569:
4070:Propose deleting/Upmerging
3742:for clarity. Sub-cats for
3253:comes in three varieties:
2959:Category:Heroes task force
2750:List of Marxian economists
4530:19:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
3988:18:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
3905:, not navies in general.
3877:19:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
3807:19:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
3779:which is more specific.--
3676:18:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
3596:05:06, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
3585:05:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
3534:23:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
3507:23:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
3487:18:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
3278:Category:Plague (disease)
3265:. They are all caused by
3177:20:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
3100:23:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
3078:18:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
2946:19:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
2872:20:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
2855:01:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
2719:18:29, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
2645:19:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
2518:18:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
2347:23:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
2208:That's precisely it - we
2204:19:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
2182:03:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
2148:03:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
2128:17:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
2098:01:47, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
2083:05:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
2059:Eastern Catholic Churches
2050:23:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
2037:Here is an example source
2032:22:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
2017:16:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1970:23:14, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1955:20:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1937:14:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1914:22:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1899:20:28, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1884:14:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1845:09:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1803:05:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1783:23:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1752:12:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
1737:09:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
1715:05:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1696:19:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1673:20:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1655:22:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1637:13:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1614:08:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1593:21:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1567:21:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1534:05:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1506:22:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
1447:22:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1429:21:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1414:21:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1389:21:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1368:20:57, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1349:19:57, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1310:21:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1273:17:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
1251:15:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
1188:21:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1169:17:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
1150:20:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
1127:14:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1101:07:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
1071:02:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
969:. By all means do create
870:02:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
737:02:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
659:17:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
359:11:44, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
287:07:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
111:10:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
4541:Please do not modify it.
4512:09:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
4494:21:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
4477:21:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
4454:13:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
4440:13:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
4397:11:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
4368:00:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
4354:00:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
4061:21:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
4027:Please do not modify it.
3999:Please do not modify it.
3976:and properly populate -
3969:21:10, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
3951:00:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
3937:11:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
3910:01:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
3846:Please do not modify it.
3818:Please do not modify it.
3797:which is more specific.
3786:00:13, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
3768:11:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
3729:01:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
3688:Category:Eid (festivals)
3637:Please do not modify it.
3609:Please do not modify it.
3444:00:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
3418:11:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
3399:05:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
3375:03:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
3310:Plague (disease)#History
3285:02:27, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
3139:Please do not modify it.
3111:Please do not modify it.
3051:06:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
3030:18:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
3012:04:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
2985:04:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
2911:Please do not modify it.
2883:Please do not modify it.
2811:06:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
2797:per nom's findings, and
2788:08:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
2684:Please do not modify it.
2656:Please do not modify it.
2625:11:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
2605:WikiProject Warwickshire
2595:11:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
2483:Please do not modify it.
2455:Please do not modify it.
2444:04:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
2415:17:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
2382:18:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
2317:Please do not modify it.
2289:Please do not modify it.
2272:23:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
2244:17:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
2226:17:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1049:20:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
1014:16:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
987:15:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
954:16:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
935:14:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
913:03:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
895:22:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
852:21:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
827:19:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
809:17:31, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
795:14:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
772:00:23, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
713:20:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
694:23:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
636:03:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
617:22:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
600:23:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
574:20:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
552:19:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
534:23:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
516:20:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
401:19:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
368:: detailed proposal for
326:Please do not modify it.
298:Please do not modify it.
266:07:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
242:23:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
70:Please do not modify it.
4341:Nominator's rationale:
3956:Delete both categories
3896:Nominator's rationale:
3885:Category:Music of Navy
3836:Category:Music of Navy
3695:Nominator's rationale:
3326:explicitly says that "
3244:Nominator's rationale:
2966:Nominator's rationale:
2738:Nominator's rationale:
2607:have been notified. --
2563:Nominator's rationale:
2370:Nominator's rationale:
463:. Make it a subcat of
417:This is a proposal by
199:Nominator's rationale:
2823:Neo-Marxian economics
2527:Category:Banburyshire
2473:Category:Banburyshire
2063:Roman Catholic (term)
2005:Roman Catholic (term)
1089:officially recognized
580:Voice of the Faithful
377:Nominator's rationale
216:registration required
206:subscription required
3795:Category:Eid (Islam)
3777:Category:Eid (Islam)
3740:Category:Eid (Islam)
3722:Category:Eid (Islam)
3716:. It could be named
3706:Category:Eid, Norway
3662:Category:Eid (Islam)
3471:), so retaining the
3461:referred to commonly
2994:It should be called
2754:Marxian Class Theory
1862:"first among equals"
1641:The Catholic Church
1486:Episcopal Conference
1433:No, of course not. –
584:Catholics for Choice
3724:is another option.
3296:Deaths from disease
3041:is better alright.
2601:WikiProject England
1661:Our Sunday Visitor.
450:and its subcats to
410:expanded nomination
3903:United States Navy
2799:rename the article
1943:Oriental Orthodoxy
372:category hierarchy
4422:
4395:
4336:
4335:
3935:
3919:per nominator. --
3766:
3373:
2819:Marxian economics
2746:Marxian economics
2740:Per main article
2627:
2623:
2593:
2442:
2256:According to who?
2196:John Pack Lambert
2140:John Pack Lambert
1467:
1111:original research
994:original research
752:Eastern Catholics
495:
494:
109:
51:
50:
4560:
4543:
4465:Fixed nomination
4413:
4410:
4386:
4383:
4115:Extended content
4111:
4103:
4102:
4029:
4001:
3984:
3948:
3926:
3923:
3882:Propose renaming
3848:
3820:
3783:
3757:
3754:
3681:Propose renaming
3672:
3639:
3611:
3483:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3441:
3364:
3361:
3314:reliable sources
3251:Plague (disease)
3230:Propose renaming
3218:Propose renaming
3206:Propose renaming
3194:Propose renaming
3182:Propose renaming
3170:
3141:
3113:
3089:, per others in
3074:
3060:Merge and rename
2992:Merge and rename
2913:
2885:
2786:
2769:
2724:Propose renaming
2715:
2686:
2658:
2614:
2611:
2599:
2584:
2581:
2556:
2555:
2523:Propose deleting
2514:
2485:
2457:
2433:
2430:
2408:
2356:Propose renaming
2319:
2291:
2263:reliable sources
1875:reliable sources
1723:OBSERVATION. A
1465:
406:
328:
300:
259:
220:
214:
210:
204:
192:
191:
159:Propose deleting
154:
153:
121:Propose deleting
100:
97:
72:
47:
36:
31:
4568:
4567:
4563:
4562:
4561:
4559:
4558:
4557:
4556:
4550:deletion review
4539:
4408:
4381:
4337:
4116:
4076:
4072:
4036:deletion review
4025:
4019:
4014:
4008:deletion review
3997:
3986:
3982:
3946:
3921:
3907:Good Ol’factory
3855:deletion review
3844:
3838:
3833:
3827:deletion review
3816:
3781:
3752:
3726:Good Ol’factory
3674:
3670:
3646:deletion review
3635:
3629:
3624:
3618:deletion review
3607:
3485:
3481:
3466:
3439:
3396:Good Ol’factory
3359:
3334:epistemological
3282:Good Ol’factory
3268:Yersinia pestis
3168:
3148:deletion review
3137:
3131:
3126:
3120:deletion review
3109:
3076:
3072:
2952:Propose merging
2920:deletion review
2909:
2903:
2898:
2892:deletion review
2881:
2839:P. A. Samuelson
2772:
2763:
2717:
2713:
2693:deletion review
2682:
2676:
2671:
2665:deletion review
2654:
2609:
2579:
2529:
2525:
2516:
2512:
2492:deletion review
2481:
2475:
2470:
2464:deletion review
2453:
2428:
2406:
2326:deletion review
2315:
2309:
2304:
2298:deletion review
2287:
2057:members of the
1768:as a parent to
1762:
1257:Catholic Church
1199:Strongly Oppose
1055:of the category
496:
476:as a subcat of
437:as a subcat of
411:
335:deletion review
324:
318:
313:
307:deletion review
296:
257:
218:
212:
208:
202:
165:
161:
127:
123:
95:
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
4566:
4564:
4555:
4554:
4534:
4533:
4532:
4514:
4496:
4479:
4461:
4460:
4459:
4458:
4457:
4456:
4424:
4423:
4405:
4399:
4373:
4372:
4371:
4370:
4334:
4333:
4332:
4331:
4326:
4321:
4316:
4311:
4306:
4301:
4296:
4291:
4286:
4281:
4276:
4271:
4266:
4261:
4256:
4251:
4246:
4241:
4236:
4231:
4226:
4221:
4216:
4211:
4206:
4201:
4196:
4191:
4186:
4181:
4176:
4171:
4166:
4161:
4156:
4151:
4146:
4141:
4136:
4131:
4126:
4118:
4117:
4114:
4109:
4108:
4107:
4106:
4105:
4104:
4064:
4063:
4041:
4040:
4020:
4018:
4015:
4013:
4012:
3992:
3991:
3990:
3980:
3978:The Bushranger
3971:
3953:
3939:
3913:
3912:
3893:
3892:
3891:
3860:
3859:
3839:
3837:
3834:
3832:
3831:
3811:
3810:
3809:
3788:
3770:
3732:
3731:
3692:
3691:
3690:
3668:
3666:The Bushranger
3651:
3650:
3630:
3628:
3625:
3623:
3622:
3602:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3550:
3547:
3536:
3512:Rename per nom
3509:
3489:
3479:
3477:The Bushranger
3446:
3427:Alternatively.
3420:
3406:Rename per nom
3403:
3402:
3401:
3348:
3341:
3331:
3321:
3306:bubonic plague
3299:
3298:category tree.
3292:Oppose for now
3288:
3287:
3241:
3240:
3239:
3227:
3215:
3203:
3191:
3153:
3152:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3124:
3104:
3103:
3102:
3080:
3070:
3068:The Bushranger
3057:
3056:
3055:
3054:
3053:
2988:
2987:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2925:
2924:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2896:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2857:
2813:
2791:
2790:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2711:
2709:The Bushranger
2698:
2697:
2677:
2675:
2672:
2670:
2669:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2629:
2628:
2597:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2510:
2508:The Bushranger
2497:
2496:
2476:
2474:
2471:
2469:
2468:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2417:
2385:
2384:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2350:
2349:
2331:
2330:
2310:
2308:
2305:
2303:
2302:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2169:
2131:
2130:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
1978:Ambrosian Rite
1974:
1973:
1972:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1828:Byzantine rite
1824:Ambrosian rite
1761:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1639:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1517:
1497:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1466:(bolding mine)
1393:
1392:
1391:
1380:
1377:
1355:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
875:
874:
873:
872:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
799:Yes, and yes.
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
557:
556:
555:
554:
536:
493:
492:
491:
490:
482:
481:
469:
468:
456:
455:
443:
442:
413:
412:
409:
404:
374:
373:
362:
361:
340:
339:
319:
317:
314:
312:
311:
291:
290:
289:
268:
245:
244:
230:
226:
196:
195:
194:
193:
156:
155:
115:
114:
113:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4565:
4553:
4551:
4547:
4542:
4536:
4535:
4531:
4527:
4523:
4518:
4515:
4513:
4509:
4505:
4500:
4497:
4495:
4491:
4487:
4483:
4480:
4478:
4474:
4470:
4466:
4463:
4462:
4455:
4451:
4447:
4443:
4442:
4441:
4437:
4433:
4428:
4427:
4426:
4425:
4420:
4416:
4412:
4403:
4400:
4398:
4393:
4389:
4385:
4378:
4375:
4374:
4369:
4365:
4361:
4357:
4356:
4355:
4351:
4347:
4342:
4339:
4338:
4330:
4327:
4325:
4322:
4320:
4317:
4315:
4312:
4310:
4307:
4305:
4302:
4300:
4297:
4295:
4292:
4290:
4287:
4285:
4282:
4280:
4277:
4275:
4272:
4270:
4267:
4265:
4262:
4260:
4257:
4255:
4252:
4250:
4247:
4245:
4242:
4240:
4237:
4235:
4232:
4230:
4227:
4225:
4222:
4220:
4217:
4215:
4212:
4210:
4207:
4205:
4202:
4200:
4197:
4195:
4192:
4190:
4187:
4185:
4182:
4180:
4177:
4175:
4172:
4170:
4167:
4165:
4162:
4160:
4157:
4155:
4152:
4150:
4147:
4145:
4142:
4140:
4137:
4135:
4132:
4130:
4127:
4125:
4122:
4121:
4120:
4119:
4113:
4112:
4100:
4096:
4092:
4088:
4084:
4080:
4075:
4071:
4068:
4067:
4066:
4065:
4062:
4059:
4058:
4053:
4049:
4046:
4043:
4042:
4039:
4037:
4033:
4028:
4022:
4021:
4016:
4011:
4009:
4005:
4000:
3994:
3993:
3989:
3985:
3983:One ping only
3979:
3975:
3972:
3970:
3966:
3962:
3957:
3954:
3952:
3949:
3943:
3940:
3938:
3933:
3929:
3925:
3918:
3915:
3914:
3911:
3908:
3904:
3900:
3897:
3894:
3890:
3886:
3883:
3880:
3879:
3878:
3875:
3872:
3868:
3865:
3862:
3861:
3858:
3856:
3852:
3847:
3841:
3840:
3835:
3830:
3828:
3824:
3819:
3813:
3812:
3808:
3804:
3800:
3796:
3792:
3789:
3787:
3784:
3778:
3774:
3771:
3769:
3764:
3760:
3756:
3749:
3745:
3741:
3737:
3734:
3733:
3730:
3727:
3723:
3719:
3715:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3699:
3696:
3693:
3689:
3685:
3682:
3679:
3678:
3677:
3673:
3671:One ping only
3667:
3663:
3659:
3656:
3653:
3652:
3649:
3647:
3643:
3638:
3632:
3631:
3626:
3621:
3619:
3615:
3610:
3604:
3603:
3597:
3594:
3593:
3588:
3587:
3586:
3583:
3582:
3577:
3574:
3573:splitting out
3570:
3566:
3562:
3559:
3555:
3545:
3540:
3537:
3535:
3532:
3531:
3526:
3521:
3517:
3513:
3510:
3508:
3505:
3504:
3499:
3498:
3493:
3490:
3488:
3484:
3482:One ping only
3478:
3474:
3473:WP:COMMONNAME
3462:
3458:
3454:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3442:
3436:
3432:
3428:
3424:
3421:
3419:
3415:
3411:
3407:
3404:
3400:
3397:
3392:
3388:
3383:
3378:
3377:
3376:
3371:
3367:
3363:
3356:
3352:
3346:
3339:
3335:
3329:
3325:
3319:
3315:
3311:
3307:
3303:
3297:
3293:
3290:
3289:
3286:
3283:
3279:
3275:
3270:
3269:
3264:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3245:
3242:
3238:
3234:
3231:
3228:
3226:
3222:
3219:
3216:
3214:
3210:
3207:
3204:
3202:
3198:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3186:
3183:
3180:
3179:
3178:
3175:
3172:
3171:
3165:
3161:
3158:
3155:
3154:
3151:
3149:
3145:
3140:
3134:
3133:
3128:
3123:
3121:
3117:
3112:
3106:
3105:
3101:
3098:
3097:
3092:
3088:
3084:
3081:
3079:
3075:
3073:One ping only
3069:
3065:
3061:
3058:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3043:70.24.251.208
3040:
3036:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3019:
3015:
3014:
3013:
3009:
3005:
3004:70.24.251.208
3001:
2997:
2993:
2990:
2989:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2970:
2967:
2964:
2960:
2956:
2953:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2935:
2930:
2927:
2926:
2923:
2921:
2917:
2912:
2906:
2905:
2900:
2895:
2893:
2889:
2884:
2878:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2858:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2835:Joan Robinson
2832:
2828:
2824:
2820:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2803:70.24.251.208
2800:
2796:
2793:
2792:
2789:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2771:
2767:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2725:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2716:
2714:One ping only
2710:
2706:
2703:
2700:
2699:
2696:
2694:
2690:
2685:
2679:
2678:
2673:
2668:
2666:
2662:
2657:
2651:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2638:
2634:
2631:
2630:
2626:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2606:
2602:
2598:
2596:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2564:
2561:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2528:
2524:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2515:
2513:One ping only
2509:
2505:
2502:
2499:
2498:
2495:
2493:
2489:
2484:
2478:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2465:
2461:
2456:
2450:
2449:
2445:
2440:
2436:
2432:
2425:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2410:
2409:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2386:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2357:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2348:
2345:
2344:
2339:
2338:Create subcat
2336:
2333:
2332:
2329:
2327:
2323:
2318:
2312:
2311:
2306:
2301:
2299:
2295:
2290:
2284:
2283:
2273:
2270:
2269:
2264:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2252:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2232:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2183:
2180:
2179:
2174:
2170:
2168:, by the way.
2167:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2136:
2133:
2132:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2120:Peterkingiron
2116:
2113:
2112:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2038:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1989:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1947:Laurel Lodged
1944:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1925:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1882:
1881:
1876:
1873:
1869:
1868:
1863:
1859:
1858:the catechism
1855:
1853:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1837:Laurel Lodged
1834:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1780:
1773:
1771:
1767:
1764:I've created
1759:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1721:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1688:Laurel Lodged
1685:
1684:Strong oppose
1682:
1681:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1602:Strong Oppose
1600:
1599:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1559:Laurel Lodged
1556:
1552:
1549:
1548:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1504:
1503:
1498:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1478:
1477:
1471:
1464:
1462:
1458:
1453:
1452:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1426:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1394:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1381:
1378:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1347:
1346:
1341:
1337:
1336:
1331:
1327:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
965:
964:
955:
951:
947:
943:
938:
937:
936:
932:
928:
924:
923:Old Catholics
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
902:
898:
897:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
877:
876:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
854:
853:
849:
845:
841:
838:
837:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
811:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:
796:
792:
788:
784:
779:
775:
774:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
746:
745:
738:
734:
730:
726:
721:
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
702:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
672:
671:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
639:
638:
637:
633:
629:
625:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
606:
603:
602:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
566:Laurel Lodged
562:
559:
558:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
498:
497:
488:
484:
483:
479:
475:
471:
470:
466:
462:
458:
457:
453:
449:
445:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
424:
420:
415:
414:
408:
407:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
371:
367:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
351:Mike Selinker
348:
347:no consensus.
345:
342:
341:
338:
336:
332:
327:
321:
320:
315:
310:
308:
304:
299:
293:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
269:
267:
264:
261:
260:
254:
250:
247:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
217:
207:
200:
197:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
164:
160:
157:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
119:
118:
117:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
92:
89:
86:
85:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
4540:
4537:
4516:
4498:
4481:
4464:
4401:
4376:
4340:
4069:
4055:
4047:
4044:
4026:
4023:
3998:
3995:
3973:
3955:
3941:
3916:
3898:
3895:
3881:
3866:
3863:
3845:
3842:
3817:
3814:
3790:
3772:
3735:
3697:
3694:
3684:Category:Eid
3680:
3657:
3654:
3636:
3633:
3627:Category:Eid
3608:
3605:
3592:Black Falcon
3590:
3581:Black Falcon
3579:
3572:
3568:
3557:
3553:
3538:
3528:
3519:
3511:
3501:
3496:
3495:
3491:
3456:
3452:
3448:
3433:a parent of
3426:
3422:
3405:
3390:
3386:
3381:
3344:
3337:
3327:
3318:WP:SYNthesis
3291:
3273:
3266:
3246:
3243:
3229:
3217:
3205:
3193:
3181:
3166:
3159:
3156:
3138:
3135:
3110:
3107:
3094:
3083:Rename/Merge
3082:
3059:
2991:
2968:
2965:
2951:
2931:
2928:
2910:
2907:
2882:
2879:
2859:
2847:Omnipaedista
2843:back in 1957
2833:. Note that
2815:
2798:
2794:
2765:
2757:
2741:
2737:
2723:
2704:
2701:
2683:
2680:
2655:
2652:
2632:
2570:Banburyshire
2565:
2562:
2522:
2503:
2500:
2482:
2479:
2454:
2451:
2419:
2404:
2369:
2355:
2341:
2337:
2334:
2316:
2313:
2288:
2285:
2266:
2255:
2250:
2249:
2236:209.6.69.227
2230:
2209:
2190:
2176:
2166:nicene creed
2161:
2157:
2153:
2134:
2114:
2090:209.6.69.227
2066:
2054:
2024:209.6.69.227
1987:
1982:Latin Church
1962:209.6.69.227
1929:209.6.69.227
1906:209.6.69.227
1878:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1849:
1807:
1777:
1774:
1763:
1683:
1660:
1642:
1620:
1601:
1550:
1512:
1500:
1475:
1474:
1460:
1456:
1454:
1423:
1397:
1383:
1360:209.6.69.227
1343:
1334:
1333:
1320:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1278:
1265:209.6.69.227
1261:Organization
1260:
1256:
1243:209.6.69.227
1206:
1205:) is useful
1198:
1161:209.6.69.227
1137:
1119:209.6.69.227
1114:
1080:
1076:
1054:
1032:
1027:
1023:
1019:
997:
966:
878:
839:
777:
760:Latin Church
747:
719:
673:
651:209.6.69.227
604:
561:Observation'
560:
499:
419:JorgePeixoto
416:
384:
376:
375:
365:
346:
343:
325:
322:
297:
294:
270:
255:
248:
198:
158:
120:
90:
87:
69:
66:
4522:Vegaswikian
4504:Traveler100
4486:Vegaswikian
4469:Vegaswikian
3748:Eid ul-Fitr
3744:Eid al-Adha
3714:Eid ul-Fitr
3710:Eid al-Adha
3554:XXXX deaths
3544:Black Death
3425:per nom or
3302:Black Death
3020:, right? --
2938:Dana boomer
2069:dislike. "
1891:John Carter
1812:Anglicanism
1665:John Carter
1606:Benkenobi18
1087:, which is
967:Observation
927:John Carter
887:John Carter
609:John Carter
508:Vegaswikian
91:delete both
4411:HairedGirl
4384:HairedGirl
3944:per nom.--
3924:HairedGirl
3874:Od Mishehu
3755:HairedGirl
3362:HairedGirl
3345:historical
3263:septicemic
3016:You mean,
2932:Rename to
2612:HairedGirl
2582:HairedGirl
2431:HairedGirl
2260:verifiable
1872:verifiable
1820:Latin rite
1643:definitely
1482:imprimatur
1235:Unofficial
223:WP:PAYWALL
98:HairedGirl
4546:talk page
4032:talk page
4004:talk page
3871:עוד מישהו
3851:talk page
3823:talk page
3642:talk page
3614:talk page
3569:upmerging
3520:(disease)
3516:pandemics
3457:Y. pestis
3453:Y. pestis
3259:pneumonic
3164:Fayenatic
3144:talk page
3116:talk page
3022:George Ho
2977:George Ho
2973:WP:HEROES
2916:talk page
2888:talk page
2801:instead.
2689:talk page
2661:talk page
2488:talk page
2460:talk page
2402:Fayenatic
2398:WP:HOTCAT
2322:talk page
2294:talk page
2214:Roscelese
2158:universal
2042:Elizium23
1988:Maronites
1791:Roscelese
1744:Elizium23
1725:news item
1703:Roscelese
1647:Elizium23
1625:Roscelese
1581:Roscelese
1522:Roscelese
1435:Roscelese
1402:Roscelese
1298:Roscelese
1176:Roscelese
1059:Roscelese
1002:Roscelese
942:Roscelese
919:this page
901:Roscelese
858:Roscelese
844:Elizium23
815:Roscelese
801:Elizium23
783:Roscelese
764:Elizium23
756:sui juris
748:Objection
725:Roscelese
682:Roscelese
624:Roscelese
588:Roscelese
540:Roscelese
522:Roscelese
423:Roscelese
389:Roscelese
331:talk page
303:talk page
279:CaseyPenk
253:Fayenatic
75:talk page
4548:or in a
4419:contribs
4392:contribs
4034:or in a
4006:or in a
3947:Lenticel
3932:contribs
3853:or in a
3825:or in a
3782:Lenticel
3763:contribs
3644:or in a
3616:or in a
3558:renaming
3440:Lenticel
3382:specific
3370:contribs
3146:or in a
3118:or in a
2918:or in a
2890:or in a
2864:Robofish
2762:Justin (
2691:or in a
2663:or in a
2620:contribs
2590:contribs
2490:or in a
2462:or in a
2439:contribs
2324:or in a
2296:or in a
2222:contribs
2154:catholic
2071:Catholic
1799:contribs
1711:contribs
1633:contribs
1589:contribs
1551:Question
1530:contribs
1473:varied.
1443:contribs
1410:contribs
1398:specific
1306:contribs
1283:official
1259:to the '
1231:Official
1184:contribs
1142:Robofish
1077:category
1067:contribs
1010:contribs
950:contribs
909:contribs
866:contribs
823:contribs
791:contribs
733:contribs
690:contribs
632:contribs
596:contribs
548:contribs
530:contribs
500:Question
397:contribs
333:or in a
305:or in a
229:backlog.
106:contribs
77:or in a
20: |
4517:Support
4499:Support
4482:Comment
4446:Kumioko
4432:Kumioko
4360:Kumioko
4346:Kumioko
4087:history
4048:UpMerge
3799:Johnbod
3492:Comment
3391:broader
3255:bubonic
2860:Support
2816:Support
2637:Johnbod
2574:Banbury
2540:history
2191:Comment
2115:Comment
2075:Esoglou
2009:Esoglou
1997:western
1993:eastern
1729:Esoglou
1513:related
1207:because
1138:Support
1093:Esoglou
1041:Esoglou
998:happens
979:Esoglou
879:Support
840:Support
778:current
705:Esoglou
605:Comment
472:Create
459:Create
446:Rename
429:Create
366:Propose
234:Toohool
176:history
138:history
4415:(talk)
4388:(talk)
3974:Rename
3961:Mangoe
3942:Rename
3928:(talk)
3917:Rename
3899:Rename
3791:Rename
3773:Rename
3759:(talk)
3736:Rename
3698:Rename
3658:rename
3539:Rename
3497:should
3449:Oppose
3423:Rename
3387:narrow
3366:(talk)
3338:should
3261:, and
3247:Rename
3160:rename
2795:Oppose
2752:, and
2705:rename
2633:Delete
2616:(talk)
2586:(talk)
2566:Delete
2504:delete
2435:(talk)
2420:Oppose
2248:JPL -
2194:cases.
2156:means
2135:Oppose
1826:, the
1822:, the
1494:WP:TNT
1488:? The
1321:Oppose
1288:itself
454:, etc.
249:Delete
102:(talk)
55:June 7
43:June 8
38:June 6
4409:Brown
4382:Brown
4095:watch
4091:links
3922:Brown
3867:Merge
3753:Brown
3525:WP:OR
3429:make
3410:Oculi
3360:Brown
3308:(see
3174:ondon
2969:Merge
2758:would
2610:Brown
2580:Brown
2548:watch
2544:links
2429:Brown
2412:ondon
2210:don't
2162:Roman
1816:rites
1808:Folly
1374:WP:OR
1279:vague
263:ondon
184:watch
180:links
146:watch
142:links
96:Brown
46:: -->
16:<
4526:talk
4508:talk
4490:talk
4473:talk
4450:talk
4436:talk
4402:Keep
4377:Note
4364:talk
4350:talk
4099:logs
4083:talk
4079:edit
4057:jc37
4054:. -
3965:talk
3803:talk
3746:and
3712:and
3530:jc37
3503:jc37
3414:talk
3351:gout
3324:WP:V
3300:The
3274:kind
3162:. –
3096:jc37
3066:. -
3047:talk
3026:talk
3008:talk
2981:talk
2942:talk
2868:talk
2851:talk
2845:. --
2831:this
2829:and
2827:this
2821:and
2807:talk
2641:talk
2603:and
2552:logs
2536:talk
2532:edit
2378:talk
2374:Ross
2343:jc37
2268:jc37
2240:talk
2218:talk
2200:talk
2178:jc37
2175:. -
2144:talk
2124:talk
2094:talk
2079:talk
2055:Some
2046:talk
2028:talk
2013:talk
1966:talk
1951:talk
1933:talk
1910:talk
1895:talk
1880:jc37
1867:part
1841:talk
1795:talk
1779:jc37
1748:talk
1733:talk
1707:talk
1692:talk
1669:talk
1651:talk
1629:talk
1610:talk
1585:talk
1563:talk
1526:talk
1516:for.
1502:jc37
1490:Pope
1439:talk
1425:jc37
1422:? -
1406:talk
1385:jc37
1364:talk
1354:etc.
1345:jc37
1302:talk
1293:only
1269:talk
1247:talk
1233:and
1180:talk
1165:talk
1146:talk
1123:talk
1097:talk
1063:talk
1045:talk
1028:name
1006:talk
983:talk
946:talk
931:talk
905:talk
891:talk
862:talk
848:talk
819:talk
805:talk
787:talk
768:talk
729:talk
720:that
709:talk
686:talk
674:Note
655:talk
628:talk
613:talk
592:talk
582:and
570:talk
544:talk
526:talk
512:talk
421:and
393:talk
381:here
355:talk
283:talk
238:talk
188:logs
172:talk
168:edit
150:logs
134:talk
130:edit
93:. --
35:<
4417:• (
4390:• (
4050:to
3930:• (
3887:to
3793:to
3775:to
3761:• (
3738:to
3702:Eid
3686:to
3660:to
3563:to
3368:• (
3280:.
3235:to
3223:to
3211:to
3199:to
3187:to
3085:to
3062:to
3037:or
2998:or
2957:to
2742:BUT
2729:to
2618:• (
2588:• (
2437:• (
2361:to
2067:all
1995:or
1621:any
1476:How
1335:why
1081:for
1024:for
703:.
645:or
506:?
385:lay
211:or
104:• (
22:Log
4528:)
4510:)
4492:)
4475:)
4452:)
4438:)
4366:)
4352:)
4097:|
4093:|
4089:|
4085:|
4081:|
3967:)
3869:.
3805:)
3664:.
3567:,
3416:)
3257:,
3249:.
3049:)
3028:)
3010:)
2983:)
2944:)
2870:)
2853:)
2809:)
2768:vf
2764:ko
2748:,
2707:.
2643:)
2550:|
2546:|
2542:|
2538:|
2534:|
2506:.
2380:)
2242:)
2224:)
2220:⋅
2202:)
2146:)
2126:)
2096:)
2081:)
2048:)
2030:)
2015:)
1968:)
1953:)
1935:)
1912:)
1897:)
1852:ec
1843:)
1801:)
1797:⋅
1772:.
1750:)
1735:)
1713:)
1709:⋅
1694:)
1671:)
1653:)
1635:)
1631:⋅
1612:)
1591:)
1587:⋅
1565:)
1532:)
1528:⋅
1463:."
1445:)
1441:⋅
1412:)
1408:⋅
1366:)
1308:)
1304:⋅
1271:)
1249:)
1225:,
1221:,
1217:,
1186:)
1182:⋅
1167:)
1148:)
1125:)
1099:)
1069:)
1065:⋅
1047:)
1020:of
1012:)
1008:⋅
985:)
952:)
948:⋅
933:)
911:)
907:⋅
893:)
881:-
868:)
864:⋅
850:)
825:)
821:⋅
807:)
793:)
789:⋅
770:)
762:.
735:)
731:⋅
711:)
692:)
688:⋅
657:)
634:)
630:⋅
615:)
598:)
594:⋅
572:)
550:)
546:⋅
532:)
528:⋅
514:)
399:)
395:⋅
357:)
285:)
240:)
219:}}
213:{{
209:}}
203:{{
186:|
182:|
178:|
174:|
170:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
136:|
132:|
4524:(
4506:(
4488:(
4471:(
4448:(
4434:(
4421:)
4394:)
4362:(
4348:(
4101:)
4077:(
3963:(
3934:)
3801:(
3765:)
3412:(
3372:)
3320:.
3169:L
3045:(
3024:(
3006:(
2979:(
2940:(
2866:(
2849:(
2805:(
2785:☯
2783:M
2781:☺
2779:C
2777:☮
2775:T
2773:❤
2770:)
2766:a
2639:(
2622:)
2592:)
2554:)
2530:(
2441:)
2407:L
2376:(
2238:(
2216:(
2198:(
2142:(
2122:(
2092:(
2077:(
2044:(
2026:(
2011:(
1964:(
1949:(
1931:(
1908:(
1893:(
1854:)
1850:(
1839:(
1793:(
1789:–
1746:(
1731:(
1705:(
1690:(
1667:(
1649:(
1627:(
1608:(
1583:(
1561:(
1524:(
1520:–
1437:(
1404:(
1376:.
1362:(
1300:(
1267:(
1245:(
1178:(
1174:–
1163:(
1144:(
1121:(
1095:(
1061:(
1043:(
1004:(
981:(
944:(
929:(
903:(
889:(
860:(
846:(
817:(
803:(
785:(
781:–
766:(
727:(
723:–
707:(
684:(
653:(
626:(
622:–
611:(
590:(
568:(
542:(
524:(
510:(
489:.
441:.
391:(
353:(
281:(
258:L
236:(
190:)
166:(
152:)
128:(
108:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.