Knowledge

:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 September 7 - Knowledge

Source 📝

2662:, which would be a restrictive definition too far(!). The fact that men exist and function perfectly acceptably with one testicle only is important to those suffering from or afraid to report their own personal testicular cancer. It is heartening to see a group of notable people who have, for one reason or another, lost one of the pair, and who are citably functioning without it. I think the category has a psychological, medical and encyclopaedic benefit for being present. I believe the benefits of retaining this category far outweigh any possible technical and procedural reasons for removing it. There are times to 2507:—The comparison with "castration" is inapt. There are several ways for an individual to have only one testicle, whereas there is only one way for an individual to be castrated. The fact that various men have been born with a single testicle, had one surgically excised for a variety of reasons (torsion, agenesis, herniae, etc.), or suffered scrotal trauma is not defining for those men. The strong BLP issues and RS issues associated with these three categories add additional problems. 1464:). This category is an admirable attempt to provide readers for a way to determine if bio articles are from Mohawks in what is now Ontario, Quebec or New York State. Still, the Mohawk people reject (to varying degrees) being defined by Canadian or U.S. citizenship. If kept, I'd propose a rename to Mohawk people in Canada (or Ontario or Quebec) as the current name, again, seems to emphasize nationality (which is an imposition) as opposed to location. 1600:. The people here are Mohawk by ethnicity, not just descent, and Canadian by nationality. People of Mohawk descent are not fully integrated into Mohawk life, Mohawk people are, they are distinct groups of people.Contrary to what was said above these are not duplicate categories, they are distinguishable and different groups of people. 2912:. This property does not seem to be defining. A category for testicle-cancer survivors (who've not had two orchiectomies) would make sense; other conditions suggesting prudent orchiectomies could also be the basis of categories. (Reliable sources demonstrating that monorchism is a useful concept would change my mind, though....) 2600:- it's not clear the category serves any purpose other than trivia. WP:BLPCAT applies, I think, in that just because someone has this condition doesn't mean it is relevant to their notability. No, it's not a religious belief or sexual orientation, but...it also isn't necessarily related to notability either. 1049:; satellite is inactive, and objects discovered by this satellite appear in its subcategory. No upmerge needed, since the satellite is already categorized in them, and the subcategory should not be categorized into them. Aside from the subcategory, there is only the satellite article in this category. 578:
There is a definition of the membership condition, there are already articles within this category, there is a useful distinction from guitar tunings in general. Any question as to whether the definition and explanation belongs either here, or in a linked article, is firstly mere formatting trivia
1328:
this category is being used to group works written by Native Americans. I am not convinced that this function is needed, but the proposed rename will totally change the category to something it is not. I would discorage creating the porposed target, but if the person can find books that fit the
788:
of the nominator's rationale. Create the higher level category if not already present and migrate the contents of this category into it and relevant (yet to be created?) sub categories. The creator is doing an excellent job with sorting out this hierarchy 0f categories. One cannot get everything
516:
Well, these issues are delicate, and the concerns were fairly stated. I hesitated to write the article because a good article for readers would require abstracting the discussions of repetitive tuning (with author A comparing tunings 1, 2, 3 and author B comparing tunings 1, 3, 4, and author C
2550:
supposed to be about a 'defining' condition too? No. It's a category that aids to link together a number of articles which have relationship to a medical syndrome. My research discloses that there's no lower limit to the number of members in a category. There can be one like in
517:
comparing tunings 4, 5, 6, for example). At DYK, the reviewer reconsidered. However, others are welcome to join the discussion and discuss WP:Synthesis. (The reviewer seemed to be familiar with categorical discussions, so I did not note the notice here at DYK or the talk page.)
1862:. In view of the number of artcles in subcategories the bottom level of categorisiation should be by decade. There should be no need to split this by century: there have only been about 190 decades since Christ died, and there were few or no church buildings before 300 AD. 2688:
or people who have only one functioning kidney despite the fact that both conditions can be quite problematic. The key here is the difference between problematic and defining. Besides, if people with monochrism want to see a list of examples, it's already in the article.
280:
per two prior other oppose !votes, but I suggest we require an absolute clarification accessible by the non-skilled reader (in which class I place myself) in the header of the category to explain what the category is about. A link to a relevant article will suffice.
1329:
propsed target they are welcome to seek to create the category, but the current contents of the category would not at all belong in the target as a group. Some of the works of the mentioned authors here might also fit the propsed target, but as a group they do not.
2733:, navigation between pages is already easy through the links in the article. Keeping the category would make it liable to be used inappropriately for biographies; the list of people in the article is better for this, as it has explanations and sources. – 836:, the category was only created today, as part of an exercise to regularise the categories (in my opinion). As such no editors are actually using it save for the editor who created it, who agrees with the nomination. This is a good case for 1837:, it would encourage the movement of the articles into subcategories. Even if the change below this fails, this category still is not needed and in fact its existence could discourage migration into the by year categories. 1883:
per Peterkingiron. There is no need to split by the by-decade categories by century, and regardless of whether decades or individual years is the bottom level of categorisation, the decades are a useful navigational tool.
817:
Please do not empty categories that are under discussion, as a general rule (and one that is explicitly stated in the CfD procedures). It is helpful to see how editors are using a category when it is under discussion.-
2707:
makes sense. But this is because missing a leg is typically defining. Nobody here is skittish about discussing testicles and you can see above and in the related CfDs that people are perfectly comfortable defending
2653:
route to argue in favour of keeping it, but that would be counter-productive. I am wondering if it is because the body part is a testicle that this discussion is being held at all. It's not as if we have categories
2402:). The editor is well aware that the other two categories are nominated for deletion and that all other editors have so far agreed that these categories need to go. At this stage, creating this category is 222:(e.g., repetitive regular tunings have intervals dividing 12), along with its consequences: Easier learning of fretboard/chords and easier improvisation. Individual articles have further discussions: E.g. 762:
This is an ambiguous open-ended category. The entries in this category should instead be in a parent category (e.g. Christian sex abuse cases). That category should include the Catholic sub-category.
1684: 2472:. What are alternative suggestions for addressing this gap in coverage/treatment of the subject matter as far as categorisation for the individuals affected and the syndrome they have in common? 2628:
doesn't have to be 'relevant to a person's notability' for there to be a category which groups together numerous article which aren't disputed to have some relationship to its subject matter.
230:, reducing it to shifting one finger 3 strings. This property is important enough to be featured in the summary of key features of regular tunings, in the main article (summarized in the 2186:. By decade categories add an unnecessary level of navigation. Virtually all building categories are organized on a by year or by century basis and they do not pose a navigation issue. 1617:
per JPL. Being of Foo descent is not the same as being Fooish. If there is a consensus not to retain a separate careg for Canadian Mohawk ppl, then the appropriate merge target would be
2423: 502:
That's not surprising. WP:OR and SYNTH are overstatements, it's really a question of independent notability, WP:N. It may be merged. If merged, then this category should be upmerged. --
42: 37: 163:
No clear inclusion for what's "repetitive". Is EADGBE "repetitive" because it has two E's? Repetitive tuning doesn't have an article. This seems completely arbitrary and non-defining.
2165: 2149: 2133: 2117: 2101: 2085: 2069: 298:
Acting on your suggestion, I added an explanation of the category with links to relevant articles at the category. Detailed references are included in linked regular-tuning articles.
2173: 2157: 2141: 2125: 2109: 2093: 2077: 1959: 1834: 1776: 1691: 1833:
I just noticed that there really is no reason for this category. The proposed renames below would be fine with some sorting of the categories and by including these in
1280: 1012: 1697:), who should both have been notified before. I ask the closing admin to relist this discussion to allow fuller participation from editors familiar with the topic. -- 1425:
etc. If self-identification is a problem, as stated by the nominator, perhaps a group nomination to rename all such categories to "Foo people from Bar" might work. –
395:
You suggested creating an article from the categorical explanation, but you mention caveats against creating such an article. Would you clarify your position, please?
184:'s and other reliable sources. For example, unison tuning CCCCCC, major-thirds tuning E-G♯-c-e-g♯-c', augmented fourths tuning BFBFBF, cittern tuning CGCGCG, etc. 594:
article or else they should be deleted" is nonsense (and not the first time that TPH has invented such spurious conditions and cited them as if they were policy).
2456:
I submit that there should be one category for the people named 'Monorchid people' and a category for the nonintersecting qualifying condition 'Monorchism'.
1003: 402:, but a couple don't have stand-alone articles. Open tunings are very important, e.g. for slide guitar, and so they are highlighted in Sethares's guidebook. 539:
The article was briefly tagged with the possible-neologism template, but has been removed by another editor. Others are welcome to discuss that issue also!
1653: 1544: 1500: 2684:
I strongly reject that type of argument. Call me cold-hearted but we're an encyclopedia, not a support group. We don't have categories for sufferers of
2209:
the annual categories into these. Sampling indicates that a lot of annual catgories have just one article. This does not provide a useful category.
1926: 1798: 2169: 2153: 2137: 2121: 2105: 2089: 2073: 325:
Well, excuse me for thinking something should have a category when it has no corresponding article. In that case, why don't I make a category for
133: 21: 2779: 2738: 1967: 1942: 1430: 1292: 705: 2703:
And one more thing: it's true that we wouldn't necessarily have this discussion if it was a different body part. Indeed, everyone agrees that
2666:. This is one such time. However it and the other categories reflecting this single topic shoudl be rationalised such that only one exists. 2051: 1896: 1709: 1668: 1633: 1284: 1272: 1189: 984: 105: 1483:
as per nom, and also many notable Mohawk people have lived in both the United States and Canada. This is an example of overcategorization. -
2874: 740: 732: 1880: 1859: 1276: 1104: 1050: 17: 1020: 2225:
None of the actual categories now have just one article. Looking at the 2 article categories - most of them will have more by the end.
124: 723: 2659: 1406: 2837:) has been indefinitely blocked as a troll; this category appears to have been created in bad faith for the purpose of trolling. - 2655: 1414: 1211: 365:
I am unsure as to whether the category should stay in addition to the new article. It looks to belong in the current structure of
2649:
on the simple basis that, while it is not a defining characteristic, it is a definite characteristic. I'm tempted to go down the
1447: 370: 1224:. The current name is ambiguous and could either refer to books about Native Americans or books written by Native Americans. - 1422: 1418: 1267:, as it only contains sub-categories which are not necessarily about Native Americans (even if that is mostly the case), but 1207: 326: 141: 2929: 2902: 2878: 2848: 2834: 2811: 2788: 2765: 2747: 2721: 2698: 2675: 2637: 2616: 2586: 2563: 2537: 2516: 2497: 2481: 2442: 2415: 2338: 2267: 2250: 2234: 2218: 2195: 2056: 1976: 1920: 1901: 1871: 1846: 1828: 1790: 1714: 1673: 1647: 1638: 1609: 1583: 1558: 1531: 1513: 1492: 1473: 1439: 1338: 1320: 1301: 1255: 1233: 1194: 1112: 1095: 1081: 1058: 989: 907: 880: 866: 849: 827: 812: 798: 780: 714: 634: 603: 556: 534: 511: 497: 467: 433: 419: 386: 336: 318: 290: 272: 251: 213: 201: 170: 110: 1527: 1469: 2922: 2895: 2785: 2744: 1973: 1948: 1436: 1298: 711: 627: 549: 527: 490: 460: 412: 311: 244: 194: 2399: 2949: 2709: 2650: 2552: 2469: 2315: 2287: 2047: 2024: 1996: 1892: 1762: 1734: 1705: 1664: 1629: 1605: 1386: 1358: 1334: 1185: 1162: 1134: 1077: 980: 957: 929: 862: 808: 682: 654: 344: 101: 78: 2528:) and so a 'people' subcat is not admissible; accordingly there are insufficient articles for a topic category. 2870: 2842: 2580: 2491: 2395: 2361: 1914: 1552: 1314: 1103:
they should not be appearing in those, as they are not telescopes, but objects observed in the telescopes. --
1089: 2512: 2214: 1867: 1786: 1108: 1054: 366: 1597: 1073: 2457: 1618: 1571: 1523: 1465: 1402: 599: 354:
This is not to say that the article is an appropriate article. It may be. Or it may belong merged into
2945: 2915: 2888: 2775: 2734: 2334: 2311: 2283: 2191: 2020: 1992: 1963: 1938: 1842: 1824: 1758: 1730: 1426: 1382: 1354: 1288: 1158: 1130: 953: 925: 701: 678: 650: 620: 542: 520: 483: 453: 405: 374: 304: 237: 187: 74: 2369: 206:
Then why doesn't it have an article? Isn't making a category first putting the cart before the horse?
2862: 2774:
Not at the moment; but other editors might add them later, especially if the other one is deleted. –
2040: 1885: 1698: 1657: 1622: 1601: 1330: 1178: 973: 858: 804: 94: 1522:
I don't see anything in the category description that precludes that. Yes, I think that would work.
2866: 2838: 2807: 2576: 2487: 2465: 2352: 2263: 2246: 2230: 1910: 1548: 1310: 1085: 507: 477: 429: 382: 268: 223: 2717: 2694: 2671: 2572: 2508: 2411: 2210: 1863: 1782: 1251: 1046: 876: 845: 794: 776: 286: 348:. The category page is a pseudoarticle. It has a talk page that suits the article talk page. 2944:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2704: 2547: 2461: 2282:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1991:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1929:
into it? I wouldn't... and I can't see any other categories for church (buildings) by decade.
1781:
The "by decade" category will have to wait until the 19th century category can be evaluated.--
1729:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1509: 1353:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1129:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
924:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
823: 649:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
614: 595: 588: 442: 2310:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2241:
I don't understand the nomination. How can somethign be renamed to two different titles? --
2019:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1757:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1381:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1157:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
952:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
677:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2828: 2761: 2633: 2559: 2477: 2331: 2187: 1838: 1820: 1644: 1579: 1488: 1246:
on the basis of the wording inside the category. It is obviously what the creator intended.
1229: 181: 2394:
This is this editor's third attempt at creating this category in some form or another (see
1068:. Acts as a container category for its subcat below its parent cats. If deleted the subcat 2609: 2533: 2435: 2403: 903: 263:. Sounds technical, and sounds like the nominator is not conversant with the subject. -- 227: 1574:. The point is that Mohawk territory spans both US and Canada and people live in both. - 2803: 2259: 2242: 2226: 1934: 1410: 503: 425: 399: 378: 359: 355: 264: 231: 219: 2713: 2690: 2667: 2663: 2407: 1247: 872: 841: 837: 790: 763: 697: 282: 1505: 819: 473: 2424:
Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_September_4#Category:Monorchid_people
2824: 2757: 2629: 2555: 2473: 1575: 1484: 1225: 2603: 2529: 2525: 2429: 899: 840:. I imagine the category may be speedied if the creating editor suggests it? 2464:, in similarity, already exist but don't seem to precisely apply. Same with 2304:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2013:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1751:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1375:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1151:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
946:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
671:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1643:
So what exactly is the category for? Mohawks or people of Mohawk descent?
1072:
need to be upmerged as other categories similar already are (for instance
2685: 2625: 2524:– the condition is not defining (and in any case there is a list within 1656:
is for those of Mohawk descent, who may not themselves be Mohawks. --
1413:
to sub-categorise both by their legal nationality. There are also
2258:
It is better to group by 10 then 10 rather than group into 100.
871:
I have requested speedy deletion based upon your message above.
2486:
Note that Oxycut has been indefinitely blocked for trolling. -
1927:
Category:19th-century Roman Catholic church buildings by decade
1799:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings by decade
1744:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings by decade
2885:
NudeGovernment has been identified as a sockpuppet of Oxycut.
2170:
Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by year of completion
2154:
Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by year of completion
2138:
Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by year of completion
2122:
Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by year of completion
2106:
Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by year of completion
2090:
Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by year of completion
2074:
Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by year of completion
898:, there should be no logical inversions in a category name. 180:. Repetition is discussed in the articles with reference to 2938:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2276:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1985:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1723:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1347:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1123:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
918:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
643:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2377: 2373: 2365: 2357: 2166:
Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1970s
2150:
Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1960s
2134:
Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1950s
2118:
Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1920s
2102:
Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1910s
2086:
Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1900s
2070:
Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1930s
2006:
Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1930s
1695: 1688: 1271:
Native Americans. This has been incorrectly added into
1028: 1024: 1016: 1008: 748: 744: 736: 728: 579:
and secondly probably dependent upon that article size.
450:
I classified it as C class, but it may be start class.
149: 145: 137: 129: 2802:. Too small, as it shouldn't contain biographies. -- 218:
There are discussions of repetition in the article on
2174:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
2158:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
2142:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
2126:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
2110:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
2094:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
2078:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
1960:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
1835:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
1777:
Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings
1275:. It needs to be removed from there and put up into 2952:). No further edits should be made to this section. 2858:into a category 'Monorchism and monorchid people' 2318:). No further edits should be made to this section. 2290:). No further edits should be made to this section. 2027:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1999:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1765:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1737:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1389:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1361:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1165:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1137:). No further edits should be made to this section. 960:). No further edits should be made to this section. 932:). No further edits should be made to this section. 685:). No further edits should be made to this section. 657:). No further edits should be made to this section. 81:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1881:Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by decade 1860:Category:Roman Catholic church buildings by decade 1281:Category:American literature by ethnic background 234:article) and in the infobox for regular tunings. 2664:make a wise decision instead of a procedural one 1283:. There should be two-way "see also" links with 1685:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America 724:Category:Non-Catholic Christian sex abuse cases 664:Category:Non-Catholic Christian sex abuse cases 2660:Category:Those missing only the right testicle 1909:the proposed merge target does not exist... - 2656:Category:Those missing only the left testicle 2330:, no point in dragging this out any further. 1212:Category:Fiction books about Native Americans 8: 1004:Category:Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer 939:Category:Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer 472:FYI, the new article has been questioned as 438:I started an article, which is referenced. 373:. Possibly, the three subpages (3rd being 1654:Category:Canadian people of Mohawk descent 1545:Category:Canadian people of Mohawk descent 1501:Category:Canadian people of Mohawk descent 352:the category listing into this article. 1925:Did they mean rename, and want to merge 480:, and the DYK nomination is on hold. :) 377:) should be upmerged as too small. -- 1208:Category:Native American fiction books 1144:Category:Native American fiction books 857:, please delete the category at will. 584:The idea that "categories must have a 327:Category:Foods made with jksadhflksdfh 1937:to follow the outcome on this one. – 1285:Category:Books about Native Americans 1273:Category:Books about Native Americans 398:There are six open tunings listed in 7: 424:I recommend creating the article. -- 1962:for reasons stated by nominator. – 1818:Normal building tree category name. 1277:Category:Native American literature 226:explains how repetition simplifies 18:Knowledge:Categories for discussion 2756:There's no people in this category 1692:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board 1596:this is a category of the type of 125:Category:Repetitive guitar-tunings 60:Category:Repetitive guitar-tunings 28: 2325:The result of the discussion was: 2034:The result of the discussion was: 1772:The result of the discussion was: 1407:Category:People of Mohawk descent 1396:The result of the discussion was: 1172:The result of the discussion was: 967:The result of the discussion was: 692:The result of the discussion was: 88:The result of the discussion was: 1652:Isn't that obvious? The parent 803:That makes sense, will do that. 1448:Category:Canadian Mohawk people 1368:Category:Canadian Mohawk people 613:: The main categorical article 371:Category:Regular guitar-tunings 2339:21:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2057:08:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1977:22:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1921:20:13, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1902:22:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1715:22:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1674:22:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1648:22:37, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1639:22:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1610:01:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 1584:00:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 1440:11:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1423:Category:American Inuit people 1419:Category:Canadian Inuit people 1415:Category:Canadian Métis people 1339:01:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 1265:Oppose and restate the purpose 1195:08:46, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 990:22:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 635:16:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 604:09:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 557:10:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 535:23:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 512:22:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 498:22:09, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 468:12:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 434:23:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 420:09:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 387:02:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 111:10:13, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 2930:13:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 2903:14:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 2879:00:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 2849:20:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2812:15:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2789:07:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2766:02:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2748:20:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2722:20:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2699:19:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2676:16:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2638:03:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2617:13:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2587:20:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2564:03:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2538:09:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2517:07:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2498:20:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2482:00:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2443:13:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2416:00:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 2268:20:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2251:15:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2235:20:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2219:15:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 2196:00:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1872:15:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 1847:03:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1829:00:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1559:20:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 1532:17:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1514:15:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1493:02:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1474:01:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1321:20:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 1302:19:47, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1256:14:05, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1234:02:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1113:03:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 1096:20:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 1059:07:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 908:14:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 881:18:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 867:18:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 850:16:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 828:15:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 813:14:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 799:14:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 781:13:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 715:20:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 337:20:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 319:14:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 291:16:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 273:15:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 252:16:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 214:22:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 202:21:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 171:21:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 30: 2400:Category:Monorchistic people 1082:Category:Infrared telescopes 1791:06:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC) 2969: 295:Hi Timtrent/Fiddle Faddle: 2710:Category:Castrated people 2553:Category:Gambian amputees 2470:Category:Castrated people 2396:Category:Monorchid people 1078:Category:Space telescopes 345:Repetitive guitar-tunings 2941:Please do not modify it. 2307:Please do not modify it. 2279:Please do not modify it. 2016:Please do not modify it. 1988:Please do not modify it. 1933:: That one should go to 1754:Please do not modify it. 1726:Please do not modify it. 1645:Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 1378:Please do not modify it. 1350:Please do not modify it. 1154:Please do not modify it. 1126:Please do not modify it. 949:Please do not modify it. 921:Please do not modify it. 674:Please do not modify it. 646:Please do not modify it. 617:in preparation for DYK. 70:Please do not modify it. 1683:. I have just notified 1504:. Duplicate category.- 367:Category:Guitar tunings 2389:Nominator's rationale: 2181:Nominator's rationale: 1806:Nominator's rationale: 1619:Category:Mohawk people 1572:Category:Mohawk people 1455:Nominator's rationale: 1403:Category:Mohawk people 1219:Nominator's rationale: 1040:Nominator's rationale: 760:Nominator's rationale: 161:Nominator's rationale: 1598:Category:Candian Jews 1074:Category:IRAS objects 375:Category:Open tunings 2458:Category:Amputations 1401:. As there are both 1076:is a subcat of both 786:Support the entirety 2823:. Category creator 2466:Category:Castration 2353:Category:Monorchism 2297:Category:Monorchism 1279:, which is part of 224:Major-thirds tuning 2651:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS 2928: 2901: 2882: 2865:comment added by 2705:Category:Amputees 2615: 2548:Category:Diabetes 2462:Category:Amputees 2441: 2055: 1900: 1713: 1672: 1637: 1602:John Pack Lambert 1524:Shawn in Montreal 1466:Shawn in Montreal 1445:Propose upmerging 1331:John Pack Lambert 1193: 988: 633: 615:repetitive tuning 555: 533: 496: 466: 443:Repetitive tuning 418: 317: 250: 200: 109: 51: 50: 2960: 2943: 2927: 2925: 2920: 2913: 2900: 2898: 2893: 2886: 2881: 2859: 2845: 2782: 2741: 2614: 2612: 2606: 2601: 2583: 2494: 2440: 2438: 2432: 2427: 2382: 2381: 2349:Propose deleting 2309: 2281: 2163:Propose renaming 2147:Propose renaming 2131:Propose renaming 2115:Propose renaming 2099:Propose renaming 2083:Propose renaming 2067:Propose renaming 2046: 2043: 2018: 1990: 1970: 1945: 1917: 1891: 1888: 1796:Propose deleting 1756: 1728: 1704: 1701: 1663: 1660: 1628: 1625: 1555: 1433: 1380: 1352: 1317: 1295: 1205:Propose renaming 1184: 1181: 1156: 1128: 1092: 1033: 1032: 1000:Propose deleting 979: 976: 951: 923: 832:As a procedural 773: 768: 753: 752: 720:Propose deleting 708: 676: 648: 632: 630: 625: 618: 593: 587: 554: 552: 547: 540: 532: 530: 525: 518: 495: 493: 488: 481: 465: 463: 458: 451: 417: 415: 410: 403: 334: 332:Ten Pound Hammer 316: 314: 309: 302: 249: 247: 242: 235: 211: 209:Ten Pound Hammer 199: 197: 192: 185: 182:William Sethares 168: 166:Ten Pound Hammer 154: 153: 121:Propose deleting 100: 97: 72: 47: 36: 31: 2968: 2967: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2950:deletion review 2939: 2923: 2916: 2914: 2896: 2889: 2887: 2860: 2847: 2843: 2780: 2739: 2610: 2604: 2602: 2585: 2581: 2496: 2492: 2436: 2430: 2428: 2404:pure disruption 2355: 2351: 2316:deletion review 2305: 2299: 2294: 2288:deletion review 2277: 2041: 2025:deletion review 2014: 2008: 2003: 1997:deletion review 1986: 1968: 1943: 1919: 1915: 1886: 1763:deletion review 1752: 1746: 1741: 1735:deletion review 1724: 1699: 1658: 1623: 1557: 1553: 1481:Support upmerge 1431: 1387:deletion review 1376: 1370: 1365: 1359:deletion review 1348: 1319: 1315: 1293: 1179: 1163:deletion review 1152: 1146: 1141: 1135:deletion review 1124: 1094: 1090: 1006: 1002: 974: 958:deletion review 947: 941: 936: 930:deletion review 919: 769: 764: 726: 722: 706: 683:deletion review 672: 666: 661: 655:deletion review 644: 628: 621: 619: 591: 585: 550: 543: 541: 528: 521: 519: 491: 484: 482: 476:, specifically 461: 454: 452: 445: 413: 406: 404: 330: 312: 305: 303: 245: 238: 236: 228:chord inversion 220:regular tunings 207: 195: 188: 186: 164: 127: 123: 95: 79:deletion review 68: 62: 57: 52: 45: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 2966: 2964: 2955: 2954: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2867:NudeGovernment 2851: 2841: 2839:The Bushranger 2814: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2769: 2768: 2751: 2750: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2701: 2679: 2678: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2620: 2619: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2579: 2577:The Bushranger 2567: 2566: 2541: 2540: 2519: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2490: 2488:The Bushranger 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2321: 2320: 2300: 2298: 2295: 2293: 2292: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2253: 2238: 2237: 2222: 2221: 2199: 2198: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2160: 2144: 2128: 2112: 2096: 2080: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2030: 2029: 2009: 2007: 2004: 2002: 2001: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1931:Note to closer 1913: 1911:The Bushranger 1904: 1874: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1768: 1767: 1747: 1745: 1742: 1740: 1739: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1641: 1612: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1562: 1561: 1551: 1549:The Bushranger 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1517: 1516: 1496: 1477: 1476: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1405:and the wider 1392: 1391: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1363: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1323: 1313: 1311:The Bushranger 1304: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1238: 1237: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1168: 1167: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1139: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1088: 1086:The Bushranger 1062: 1061: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 994: 993: 992: 963: 962: 942: 940: 937: 935: 934: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 757: 756: 755: 754: 688: 687: 667: 665: 662: 660: 659: 639: 638: 637: 607: 606: 581: 580: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 448: 447: 446: 441: 400:guitar tunings 396: 393: 360:Regular tuning 356:Guitar tunings 339: 323: 322: 321: 299: 296: 275: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 232:guitar tunings 174: 173: 158: 157: 156: 155: 115: 114: 113: 84: 83: 63: 61: 58: 56: 53: 49: 48: 40: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2965: 2953: 2951: 2947: 2942: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2926: 2921: 2919: 2911: 2908: 2904: 2899: 2894: 2892: 2884: 2883: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2857: 2856: 2852: 2850: 2846: 2844:One ping only 2840: 2836: 2833: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2821:speedy delete 2818: 2815: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2798: 2797: 2790: 2787: 2784: 2783: 2777: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2749: 2746: 2743: 2742: 2736: 2732: 2729: 2728: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2706: 2702: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2687: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2668:Fiddle Faddle 2665: 2661: 2657: 2652: 2648: 2645: 2644: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2618: 2613: 2607: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2588: 2584: 2582:One ping only 2578: 2574: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2554: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2520: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2509:Beeswaxcandle 2506: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2493:One ping only 2489: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2449: 2444: 2439: 2433: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2390: 2387: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2354: 2350: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2337: 2336: 2333: 2329: 2326: 2323: 2322: 2319: 2317: 2313: 2308: 2302: 2301: 2296: 2291: 2289: 2285: 2280: 2274: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2254: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2239: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2223: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2211:Peterkingiron 2208: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2182: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2164: 2161: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2148: 2145: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2116: 2113: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2038: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2028: 2026: 2022: 2017: 2011: 2010: 2005: 2000: 1998: 1994: 1989: 1983: 1982: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1947: 1946: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1916:One ping only 1912: 1908: 1905: 1903: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1864:Peterkingiron 1861: 1857: 1854: 1853: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1815: 1812: 1811: 1807: 1804: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1783:Mike Selinker 1780: 1778: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1760: 1755: 1749: 1748: 1743: 1738: 1736: 1732: 1727: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1696: 1693: 1689: 1686: 1682: 1681:Notifications 1679: 1675: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1655: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1646: 1642: 1640: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1620: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1592: 1591: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1554:One ping only 1550: 1546: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502: 1497: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1390: 1388: 1384: 1379: 1373: 1372: 1367: 1362: 1360: 1356: 1351: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1318: 1316:One ping only 1312: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1296: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1248:Fiddle Faddle 1245: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1220: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1160: 1155: 1149: 1148: 1143: 1138: 1136: 1132: 1127: 1121: 1120: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105:76.65.131.248 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1091:One ping only 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1064: 1063: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051:76.65.128.252 1048: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 995: 991: 986: 982: 978: 971: 968: 965: 964: 961: 959: 955: 950: 944: 943: 938: 933: 931: 927: 922: 916: 915: 909: 905: 901: 897: 894: 882: 878: 874: 873:Fiddle Faddle 870: 869: 868: 864: 860: 856: 853: 852: 851: 847: 843: 842:Fiddle Faddle 839: 835: 831: 830: 829: 825: 821: 816: 815: 814: 810: 806: 802: 801: 800: 796: 792: 791:Fiddle Faddle 787: 784: 783: 782: 778: 774: 772: 767: 761: 758: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 725: 721: 718: 717: 716: 713: 710: 709: 703: 699: 696: 695:speedy delete 693: 690: 689: 686: 684: 680: 675: 669: 668: 663: 658: 656: 652: 647: 641: 640: 636: 631: 626: 624: 616: 612: 609: 608: 605: 601: 597: 590: 583: 582: 577: 574: 558: 553: 548: 546: 538: 537: 536: 531: 526: 524: 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 501: 500: 499: 494: 489: 487: 479: 475: 471: 470: 469: 464: 459: 457: 449: 444: 440: 439: 437: 436: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 416: 411: 409: 401: 397: 394: 392:Hi SmokeyJoe! 391: 390: 389: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 363: 361: 357: 351: 347: 346: 340: 338: 333: 328: 324: 320: 315: 310: 308: 300: 297: 294: 293: 292: 288: 284: 283:Fiddle Faddle 279: 276: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 253: 248: 243: 241: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 216: 215: 210: 205: 204: 203: 198: 193: 191: 183: 179: 176: 175: 172: 167: 162: 159: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 126: 122: 119: 118: 117: 116: 112: 107: 103: 99: 92: 89: 86: 85: 82: 80: 76: 71: 65: 64: 59: 54: 44: 41: 39: 33: 32: 23: 19: 2940: 2937: 2917: 2909: 2890: 2861:— Preceding 2854: 2853: 2831: 2820: 2816: 2799: 2778: 2737: 2730: 2646: 2597: 2521: 2504: 2452: 2451: 2420: 2391: 2388: 2348: 2335: 2327: 2324: 2306: 2303: 2278: 2275: 2255: 2206: 2202: 2183: 2180: 2162: 2146: 2130: 2114: 2098: 2082: 2066: 2036: 2033: 2015: 2012: 1987: 1984: 1966: 1955: 1941: 1930: 1906: 1876: 1855: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1795: 1774: 1771: 1753: 1750: 1725: 1722: 1680: 1614: 1593: 1567: 1540: 1498: 1480: 1461: 1457: 1454: 1444: 1429: 1409:, it is not 1398: 1395: 1377: 1374: 1349: 1346: 1325: 1309:per FayL. - 1306: 1291: 1268: 1264: 1243: 1221: 1218: 1204: 1174: 1171: 1153: 1150: 1125: 1122: 1100: 1069: 1065: 1042: 1039: 999: 969: 966: 948: 945: 920: 917: 895: 859:GoodParabolē 854: 833: 805:GoodParabolē 785: 770: 765: 759: 719: 704: 694: 691: 673: 670: 645: 642: 622: 610: 596:Andy Dingley 575: 544: 522: 485: 478:WP:Synthesis 455: 407: 369:, alongside 364: 353: 349: 342: 331: 306: 277: 260: 239: 208: 189: 177: 165: 160: 120: 90: 87: 69: 66: 2819:, possibly 2647:Strong Keep 2573:WP:SMALLCAT 2332:Bencherlite 2188:Vegaswikian 1839:Vegaswikian 1821:Vegaswikian 1775:merge into 1047:WP:SMALLCAT 301:Sincerely, 55:September 7 43:September 8 38:September 6 2924:.Wolfowitz 2897:.Wolfowitz 2526:Monorchism 2044:HairedGirl 1889:HairedGirl 1702:HairedGirl 1690:) and the 1661:HairedGirl 1626:HairedGirl 1182:HairedGirl 977:HairedGirl 789:right. :) 629:.Wolfowitz 611:DYK Notice 551:.Wolfowitz 529:.Wolfowitz 492:.Wolfowitz 462:.Wolfowitz 414:.Wolfowitz 313:.Wolfowitz 246:.Wolfowitz 196:.Wolfowitz 98:HairedGirl 2946:talk page 2804:SmokeyJoe 2776:Fayenatic 2735:Fayenatic 2421:SEE ALSO: 2312:talk page 2284:talk page 2260:JASpencer 2243:SmokeyJoe 2227:JASpencer 2021:talk page 1993:talk page 1964:Fayenatic 1939:Fayenatic 1759:talk page 1731:talk page 1499:Merge to 1427:Fayenatic 1383:talk page 1355:talk page 1289:Fayenatic 1159:talk page 1131:talk page 954:talk page 926:talk page 855:Yes agree 702:Fayenatic 698:WP:CSD#G7 679:talk page 651:talk page 504:SmokeyJoe 426:SmokeyJoe 379:SmokeyJoe 341:Instead, 265:SmokeyJoe 75:talk page 2948:or in a 2875:contribs 2863:unsigned 2835:contribs 2714:Pichpich 2691:Pichpich 2686:alopecia 2626:Diabetes 2408:Pichpich 2314:or in a 2286:or in a 2203:Keep all 2052:contribs 2037:keep all 2023:or in a 1995:or in a 1907:Confused 1897:contribs 1761:or in a 1733:or in a 1710:contribs 1669:contribs 1634:contribs 1385:or in a 1357:or in a 1190:contribs 1161:or in a 1133:or in a 985:contribs 956:or in a 928:or in a 681:or in a 653:or in a 589:cat main 343:Move to 106:contribs 77:or in a 20:‎ | 2366:history 1935:WP:CFDS 1506:choster 1458:Upmerge 1411:WP:OCAT 1244:Support 1101:Comment 1017:history 820:choster 737:history 350:Listify 138:history 2918:Kiefer 2910:Delete 2891:Kiefer 2825:Oxycut 2817:Delete 2800:Delete 2758:Oxycut 2731:Delete 2630:Oxycut 2605:Frank 2598:Delete 2556:Oxycut 2522:Delete 2505:Delete 2474:Oxycut 2431:Frank 2392:Delete 2328:delete 2184:Rename 2048:(talk) 1893:(talk) 1814:Delete 1810:Rename 1706:(talk) 1665:(talk) 1630:(talk) 1586:Uyvsdi 1576:Uyvsdi 1495:Uyvsdi 1485:Uyvsdi 1462:rename 1326:Oppose 1236:Uyvsdi 1226:Uyvsdi 1222:Rename 1186:(talk) 1043:Delete 981:(talk) 838:WP:IAR 766:Jeffro 623:Kiefer 545:Kiefer 523:Kiefer 486:Kiefer 456:Kiefer 408:Kiefer 307:Kiefer 278:Oppose 261:Oppose 240:Kiefer 190:Kiefer 178:Oppose 102:(talk) 2855:Merge 2786:ondon 2745:ondon 2611:talk 2530:Oculi 2437:talk 2374:watch 2370:links 2207:merge 2042:Brown 1974:ondon 1956:Merge 1949:ondon 1887:Brown 1877:Merge 1856:Merge 1700:Brown 1659:Brown 1624:Brown 1568:Merge 1541:Merge 1437:ondon 1299:ondon 1180:Brown 1084:.) - 1025:watch 1021:links 975:Brown 900:Yworo 896:Agree 745:watch 741:links 712:ondon 474:WP:OR 146:watch 142:links 96:Brown 46:: --> 16:< 2871:talk 2829:talk 2808:talk 2762:talk 2718:talk 2695:talk 2672:talk 2658:and 2634:talk 2575:. - 2560:talk 2534:talk 2513:talk 2478:talk 2468:and 2460:and 2453:Keep 2412:talk 2398:and 2378:logs 2362:talk 2358:edit 2264:talk 2256:Keep 2247:talk 2231:talk 2215:talk 2205:but 2192:talk 2172:and 2156:and 2140:and 2124:and 2108:and 2092:and 2076:and 1868:talk 1843:talk 1825:talk 1787:talk 1621:. -- 1615:Keep 1606:talk 1594:Keep 1580:talk 1547:. - 1528:talk 1510:talk 1489:talk 1470:talk 1460:(or 1399:keep 1335:talk 1307:Keep 1287:. – 1252:talk 1230:talk 1177:. -- 1175:keep 1109:talk 1080:and 1070:does 1066:Keep 1055:talk 1029:logs 1013:talk 1009:edit 972:. -- 970:keep 904:talk 877:talk 863:talk 846:talk 834:note 824:talk 809:talk 795:talk 777:talk 749:logs 733:talk 729:edit 700:. – 600:talk 576:keep 508:talk 430:talk 383:talk 287:talk 269:talk 150:logs 134:talk 130:edit 93:. -- 91:keep 35:< 2546:Is 2168:to 2152:to 2136:to 2120:to 2104:to 2088:to 2072:to 2050:• ( 1958:to 1895:• ( 1879:to 1858:to 1708:• ( 1667:• ( 1632:• ( 1570:to 1543:to 1210:to 1188:• ( 983:• ( 362:. 358:or 335:• 212:• 169:• 104:• ( 22:Log 2877:) 2873:• 2810:) 2764:) 2720:) 2712:. 2697:) 2674:) 2636:) 2608:| 2562:) 2536:) 2515:) 2480:) 2434:| 2426:. 2414:) 2406:. 2376:| 2372:| 2368:| 2364:| 2360:| 2266:) 2249:) 2233:) 2217:) 2194:) 2039:. 1884:-- 1870:) 1845:) 1827:) 1816:. 1789:) 1608:) 1582:) 1530:) 1512:) 1491:) 1472:) 1421:, 1417:, 1337:) 1269:by 1254:) 1232:) 1111:) 1057:) 1045:. 1027:| 1023:| 1019:| 1015:| 1011:| 906:) 879:) 865:) 848:) 826:) 811:) 797:) 779:) 771:77 747:| 743:| 739:| 735:| 731:| 602:) 592:}} 586:{{ 510:) 432:) 385:) 329:? 289:) 271:) 148:| 144:| 140:| 136:| 132:| 2869:( 2832:· 2827:( 2806:( 2781:L 2760:( 2740:L 2716:( 2693:( 2670:( 2632:( 2558:( 2532:( 2511:( 2476:( 2410:( 2380:) 2356:( 2262:( 2245:( 2229:( 2213:( 2190:( 2054:) 1969:L 1944:L 1899:) 1866:( 1841:( 1823:( 1785:( 1779:. 1712:) 1694:( 1687:( 1671:) 1636:) 1604:( 1578:( 1526:( 1508:( 1487:( 1468:( 1432:L 1333:( 1294:L 1250:( 1228:( 1192:) 1107:( 1053:( 1031:) 1007:( 987:) 902:( 875:( 861:( 844:( 822:( 807:( 793:( 775:( 751:) 727:( 707:L 598:( 506:( 428:( 381:( 285:( 267:( 152:) 128:( 108:)

Index

Knowledge:Categories for discussion
Log
September 6
September 8
talk page
deletion review
BrownHairedGirl
(talk)
contribs
10:13, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Category:Repetitive guitar-tunings
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
21:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
William Sethares
Kiefer
.Wolfowitz
21:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
22:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
regular tunings
Major-thirds tuning
chord inversion
guitar tunings
Kiefer
.Wolfowitz
16:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.