24:
91:
120:
A plurality of people in the world identify as
Christian. A substantial minority of Knowledge editors identify as Christian, and some of these editors write articles on Christian-related topics. There are thousands of religions in this world, however, and in the interests of balance, Knowledge should
157:
235:
230:
185:
133:
guidelines. Typically, statements on doctrine should have the form "Group X believes doctrine Y," rather than "Doctrine Y is the true doctrine."
129:
Knowledge does not endorse a particular set of religious views. As with other articles, articles on matters of doctrine should therefore follow
209:
has 1,902 Christians, compared to 2,502 atheists, 914 Muslims, 802 agnostics, 587 "Pastafarians," 473 Jews, 256 Buddhists, and 222 Hindus.
43:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
44:
240:
206:
225:
152:
130:
112:
This essay is about a possible Judeo-Christian/Abrahamic systemic bias in some
Knowledge articles.
48:
58:
177:
142:
32:
147:
106:
36:
219:
51:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
99:
Be careful to preserve a neutral point of view about religion in articles.
121:
also give appropriate weight to other cultures and religions.
85:
18:
73:
66:
116:Identifying the Judeo-Christian/Abrahamic POV
8:
182:The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
184:. Pew Research center. 18 December 2012.
169:
158:WP:WikiProject Countering systemic bias
188:from the original on 25 December 2018
105:For civil point of view pushing, see
7:
49:thoroughly vetted by the community
45:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
236:Religion Knowledge administration
231:Knowledge essays about neutrality
207:Category:Wikipedians by religion
178:"The Global Religious Landscape"
89:
22:
1:
257:
104:
56:
16:Essay on editing Knowledge
153:Knowledge:Myth vs fiction
97:This page in a nutshell:
241:Knowledge systemic bias
47:, as it has not been
37:Neutral point of view
125:Matters of doctrine
103:
102:
84:
83:
248:
226:Knowledge essays
210:
204:
198:
197:
195:
193:
174:
93:
92:
86:
76:
69:
26:
25:
19:
256:
255:
251:
250:
249:
247:
246:
245:
216:
215:
214:
213:
205:
201:
191:
189:
176:
175:
171:
166:
139:
127:
118:
110:
90:
80:
79:
74:WP:ABRAHAMICPOV
72:
67:WP:CHRISTIANPOV
65:
61:
53:
52:
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
254:
252:
244:
243:
238:
233:
228:
218:
217:
212:
211:
199:
168:
167:
165:
162:
161:
160:
155:
150:
145:
138:
135:
126:
123:
117:
114:
101:
100:
94:
82:
81:
78:
77:
70:
62:
57:
54:
42:
41:
29:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
253:
242:
239:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
223:
221:
208:
203:
200:
187:
183:
179:
173:
170:
163:
159:
156:
154:
151:
149:
146:
144:
141:
140:
136:
134:
132:
131:verifiability
124:
122:
115:
113:
108:
98:
95:
88:
87:
75:
71:
68:
64:
63:
60:
55:
50:
46:
40:
38:
34:
28:
21:
20:
202:
190:. Retrieved
181:
172:
128:
119:
111:
96:
30:
31:This is an
220:Categories
164:References
143:WP:FIXBIAS
59:Shortcuts
192:18 March
186:Archived
148:WP:RNPOV
137:See also
107:WP:CPUSH
39:policy.
35:on the
33:essay
194:2013
222::
180:.
196:.
109:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.