607:). It's an unsourced conclusion that no reasonable and well-informed person would actually believe. Why? Because we already know that when any other, non-journalistic kind of source writes about that same topic, it will apply its own programatic capitalization standard, not the journalism one. For example, academic arts journals (except where one might have a divergent house style) will apply the excessively lowercasing, academic standard to the title, exactly the opposite of the excessively uppercasing convention of the news sources one had noticed so far; a mainstream book publisher will apply the middle-ground, five-letter rule (again, unless they have a house style rule that differs on this; some North American book publishers would actually go with the lowercase-all-prepositions academic rule, following
649:
language, and location, but these are only used as part of a larger consensus-building discussion, grounded in
Knowledge (XXG) policy, and always with the understanding that such search results are partial glimpses at data, limited to particular types of publications, and skewed by various factors (often including marked limitations of and biases in the search tools). When it comes to actually determining what an article's name should be, such searches cannot be relied upon as if they are sources themselves (your interpretation of their results is, again, original research). They are only a means for finding and looking at actual sources and the subject-specific facts they contain, again with the caveat that the data set is limited and uneven.
1144:
every way all the time. Some simple facts about style guides and
English usage are that style is largely arbitrary, there is no central authority, there are no absolute rules, and virtually every single style matter – even basic stuff like "start a sentence with a capital letter" – has conflicting advice about it in various style guides. This means that every style rule on WP is guaranteed to have someone who doesn't agree with it, and every editor is going to disagree with at least one such rule. Just deal with it.
1297:) on p. 10. It then directly contradicts itself on p. 20, and sets out capitalization rules that, naturally, match the four-letter rule already used in marketing and the music press. As of February 2016, there are no indications that this would-be standard, to the extent any sense can be made of it, has had any impact on the publishing world at all, and it was only intended for metadata in digital music files to begin with. Actual style guides for music-related English language usage, like
658:
well-sourced. If high-quality academic sources use the subject's culturally appropriate diacritics – and thus are reliable sources that their use is attested for the subjects in question – it doesn't matter how many
American or British newspapers ignore and drop the diacritics; their laziness in this regard has no impact on Knowledge (XXG), which will follow the more reliable sources, not the more common but weaker ones. Many Western news publishers (and
494:) are used so broadly by news publishers that they are a de facto general style for news writing (though some newspapers also have their own house styles that diverge from that baseline in numerous ways). As a result, various news-style quirks make frequent appearances in the results of Google (or Bing, or Yandex, etc.) searches for news source material.
720:
also inappropriate in an encyclopedia, for academic topics, until the subject was covered in the press, leading to another style dispute in the opposite direction. All roads lead right back to the stable status quo we already have: Use the compromise style favored by virtually all general-audience publishers for formal-English writing.
611:). We do not have to engage in original research ourselves to know this (e.g. by observing this effect in already-published material about works that happen to have prepositions in their titles, though we could do that in our spare time for fun, and of course observe that it's true). All we have to do is look at the style guides, the
24:
95:
193:), and it is often mistaken for a style policy rather than a naming convention. It is often even mistaken for the overriding naming policy on Knowledge (XXG), when (if one actually bothers to read it) it is just a default recommendation intended to steer us to choose the article title that is the most likely to match
112:"Knowledge (XXG)'s Manual of Style contains some conventions that differ from those in some other, well-known style guides and from what is often taught in schools. Knowledge (XXG)'s editors have discussed these conventions in great detail and have reached consensus that these conventions serve our purposes best. ...
523:, and other features not typically found in encyclopedic writing. Newswriting is a very distinct form of writing with intrinsic styles; in this, it is like fiction, how-to manuals, school textbooks, and legal documents, which all have special styles that are not simply copy-pasted from one to the other, and which
645:. The stylistic system of Knowledge (XXG) (and other general-purpose nonfiction publishing), has "equipment" not available in the journalistic rules, uses some shared features (the "ball" and "playing field", by analogy) differently, and is for a different "ballgame" with a different methodology and goal.
719:
of sources and search results), because it would always default to using informal journalistic style, inappropriate in an encyclopedia, for popular culture topics, until academics wrote about the same topic, leading to a style dispute. It would also always default to using excessively academic style,
711:
be used when the topic in question in involved. In reality, the only reliable sources for how to write formal but not excessively academic
English are style guides devoted to writing such material – the very guides upon which MoS is based. Even these are not laws, but guidance that Knowledge (XXG)'s
518:
of news writing informs
Knowledge (XXG) article development mostly (when at all) only with regard to depth of content at an article, not the order in which information is presented after the lead, which is highly variable (often chronological or geographical, depending on the nature of the subject).
1143:
Knowledge (XXG) has its own style manual for two major reasons: to produce consistent, professional-grade content for our readers; and to forestall recurrent, time-wasting disputes over stylistic trivia, by providing consistent rules for editors. Like all compromises, it will not please everyone in
559:
It is not reasonable to demand that we capitalize, say, pop song titles the way that music magazines do, since we already have a style system for handling titles of works, and it is not the same system used by most of those magazines. The same publications would also apply their capitalization rules
497:
One of the most frequent symptoms of the common-style fallacy at work is mistaking the way a group of newspapers write something for being the only or best way to write something, especially when one has not run into any sources other than news ones. The problem is, of course, that news writing and
103:
Knowledge (XXG) has its own set of policies and guidelines for article content and naming (which are distinct from each other). Facts on a subject are drawn from reliable sources, but no particular subset of them dictates how
Knowledge (XXG) must write. Style is a matter of Knowledge (XXG) community
483:
There are many house styles in which mimicking trademark stylization is considered "correct" by that particular publisher, and the majority of these are the stylesheets of low-end news organizations and blogs, especially in the entertainment and tech sectors. Theirs are not
Knowledge (XXG)'s house
440:
Wikipedians' own collective determination of what the best practices are for this project's purposes, involving both selection between conflicting off-site style guides' approaches, and resolution of style matters that are unique to
Knowledge (XXG) (there is no third-party style guide that can tell
760:
is that people in general do not "obey" or expect extraneous marketing stylizations. No one writes that they bought their shirt at "macys" or just got a "SONY" stereo for their car. Even the idea that people are following marketing/journalism style in overcapitalizing song titles turns out to be
587:
is a frequent but easily spotted sourcing error. It is a mistake to assume that, for example, a popular-culture topic that has no coverage yet in anything but the entertainment press "must" be stylized a particular way just because most of the sources you can find about the topic so far do it that
115:
Knowledge (XXG) ... is written for a general audience. ... When adopting style recommendations from external sources, the Manual of Style incorporates a substantial number of practices from style guides; however, Knowledge (XXG) defaults to preferring general-audience sources on style, especially
623:
and other journalism-specific style guides uniformly ignore this character entirely, using the hyphen for its conjoining uses, and the em dash for its parenthetic uses. Our en dash rules are based on those of more mainstream, less expediency-bound, book publishing style manuals. One of the most
744:
Doing proper search-engine tests itself requires a certain level of expertise, to weed out various form of skew, or even totally invalid results. How to do this varies not only by search engine but even by search type at the same engine. Example: In many cases, it requires detailed knowledge of
332:
There are many genres of writing, with different levels of formality and different conventions. Encyclopedic writing is notably toward the formal side of the spectrum. Knowledge (XXG) closely follows the stylistic norms of publishers of non-fiction books (which is what an encyclopedia is, after
752:
of the entertainment industry, and largely tries to keep industry players as happy as possible by doing whatever they want stylistically. Most of these publications derive the majority of their income from advertising revenue from film studios, record labels, and other entertainment industry
328:
This above-mentioned kind of "positive identifier" case is a per-name determination, and cannot be applied to an entire class of subjects, such as operating systems, titles of published works, financial services corporations, etc. How those names are styled varies by genre (with most of them
648:
We sometimes use online searches in internal discussions about the
Knowledge (XXG) title policy, naming conventions, and style guidelines, to get a sense of the implementation level of a usage matter in particular publishing circles, by shaping searches and limiting them by source type, age,
657:
Another frequent case of abuse of online search results to try to "prove" a common-style fallacy is attempting to use
English-language news sources (e.g. from Google News searches) to make a point against the use of diacritics for biographical subjects for whom that usage is preferred and
505:
Even where encyclopedic and news writing share some things in common, such as overall article structure basics (title, lead paragraph, section subheadings, paragraph breaks, supplementary material at the end, and sometimes use of a sidebar to summarize details), there are very significant
3804:
636:
style) don't use an en dash. This is the logical equivalent of insisting that it must be some kind of foul in this "golf" game, with which you are not familiar, to hit the ball with a club, because all the football games you've ever seen had no club in them. It's the wrong rule set
1302:
1844:
448:, and does not have its hands tied with regard to what stylistic decisions its editorship may agree upon. It also does not have column-width and other space constraints, and thus has no need of the compression and expediency measures taken by journalism style guides.
282:
Confusing a name with how it is styled in various contexts is like confusing your co-worker with the business attire or scuba gear you've seen her wear on different occasions in different contexts. She is not a different person because she is dressed up differently.
1313:
For an example of how to use search engines to find sources, across multiple genres, for a pop-culture topic, within the framework of applicable WP policies and guidelines, and without treating the searches incorrectly as if they were sources in their own right, see
1304:; pp. 10–11) almost always follow academic style – they do not capitalize prepositions, regardless of length. However, most of them are intended for academic publications, and most often applied to classical music, and so have had little impact on music journalism.
740:
to stylized presentations preferred by marketers, and undue elimination of acceptable stylization like correct diacritics when doing so is preferred by certain publishing blocs for their own convenience. Search engine placement, in short, reflects marketing, not
3005:
254:
is a matter of differing convention in different writing genres (e.g. marketing materials, news journalism, books about science fiction filmmaking, media studies journals, etc.). In the marketing for that film, to continue with the example, it was often styled
753:
interests. Furthermore, many of them are directly owned by the same international corporations who own the studios and labels (and many city newspapers as well). They have a doubly vested interest in mimicry of the stylization in logos and marketing materials.
1020:
It does not matter that these changes are sometimes applied by some specialized-genre style guides or individual publishers' house style in other kinds of writing. They are not applied by Knowledge (XXG)'s, or other mainstream, formal-English style manuals.
666:
policy, it is completely inappropriate to try to enlist Knowledge (XXG) in taking a side in any kind of "language battle". For diacritics, use of them by the subject for their own name, in materials with a Latin-based alphabet, is sufficient, per the
1208:
Virtually all style guides recommend writing "iPhone" as "IPhone" at the beginning of a sentence, or rewriting to avoid beginning a sentence with a name that beings with a lower-case letter (or with a numeral or other non-alphabetic symbol, as in "3M
271:". It was just a stylization in PR writing and logo design, which was "honored" by various news publications, but quite reasonably ignored in mainstream writing, across multiple genres of publication, and it is usually given in reliable sources as
2409:
498:
other forms of writing take programmatic, rule-based approaches to style matters, so someone is only looking at one "style program" when looking at those particular sources; from a style standpoint, they are all essentially just one source, the
1874:
3691:
3140:
1276:
has adopted this preference from academic journal publishing. This is not a recent change; the exclusion of prepositions from the list of words to capitalize in English-language titles dates to at least the 11th ed., in 1948 (pp.
3571:
2743:
662:, even some governmental agencies/ministries in English-speaking countries) have an official editorial policy of dropping diacritics (as well as forcing Western name order, another of these common-style fallacies). Per our
1171:
soon enough. The ability to work within a framework that is not exactly as one would have personally designed it, or entirely what one is used to in a different context like journalistic or academic writing, is a matter of
3100:
736:(SEO) by experts skilled in manipulating search engines (and sometimes also by paying a search engine directly for high placement – i.e. advertising – depending on the search engine in question); this automatically gives
2909:
2504:
3944:
2211:
348:, and the differences between these writing style systems are easy to identify and differentiate by referring to those manuals. MoS is based on a particular subset of them for a reason: They already encapsulate the
618:
As another example, we need not do an original-research survey of whether newspapers use the en dash character in the ways MoS prescribes that it be used on Knowledge (XXG). We already know they do not, because the
3884:
3631:
3252:
1889:
3954:
3696:
1556:
4220:
4215:
3506:
1154:
the operating rules for the Knowledge (XXG) system, and that we're playing by these rules, so that we can get to work on building the encyclopedia and remain focused on that. To the extent anyone is trying to
307:
by that name and stylization, and automatically go with whatever had a 50.01% majority. We do not do this. What we actually look for is near-total conformity with a stylization. Thus, the singer's article is
4009:
778:) to accept a simple stylization matter that is also accepted by virtually all sources across all publications styles (not just one) to be intrinsic to a particular name. In practice this is limited to:
2309:
294:
regardless what kind of publication it is found in, from books, to newspapers, to academic journals. This exception for overwhelmingly consistent use in reliable sources is already to be found in both
3994:
337:(from which Knowledge (XXG) also borrows many features, when they aren't problematic for our readers), it is nevertheless also much less vernacular, compressed, and lowest-common-denominator than the
3744:
2284:
2339:
2036:
303:. If WP:COMMONNAME actually had anything to do with this sort of question, those guidelines would not exist, and we would simply do a head-count of how many sources write "Pink" versus "P!nk" for
4014:
3421:
2607:
2061:
1984:
1566:
2186:
1616:
1606:
707:: the assumption that sources that are reliable for facts being reported about a topic are somehow transubstantiated into reliable sources, purely through example, of how the English language
3461:
3441:
2404:
2374:
1067:, or naming conventions pages when consensus hasn't gone the way you desire. If your proposal to change Knowledge (XXG)'s approach to a stylistic matter is not successful, do not continue to
225:; all the rest of the policy is based on and refers to these, including WP:COMMONNAME. And the title policy does not directly affect how we write content, aside from article titles, anyway.
1686:
2698:
2424:
1701:
1641:
1774:
4159:
2106:
3466:
1075:
4317:
3546:
3501:
3411:
3361:
2627:
2354:
2329:
4268:
398:
laying out the house style of this encyclopedia. It is not part of the encyclopedia's content, but has been developed and is maintained, like all of our policies and guidelines, by
4054:
2344:
1979:
1964:
1012:, a problem common among tech, gaming, music, and movie/TV magazines and websites, i.e. the celebrity, entertainment, and "infotainment" press; see the section about this, above).
1676:
530:
A concrete, topical example: There are three well-documented conventions for the initial letter-case of prepositions used in the titles of published works and other compositions:
931:
It is accepted for software that only exists as a command-line executable given in all-lowercase, even when it is an acronym or contains one that would otherwise be capitalized:
3381:
1944:
480:, because the expediency- and attention-based needs of news publishing have little in common with the long-term educational and precision-focused writing of encyclopedic prose.
3536:
3451:
2567:
2419:
2324:
1939:
1899:
1754:
1195:
policy does indirectly affect how we write article content, in that we tend to refer to a topic by the same name in the prose as we do in the title, at least in the article's
4164:
3257:
3170:
2768:
2509:
2334:
2259:
1994:
1969:
1894:
1506:
1465:
1401:
437:
with the expectations of the above and thus negatively affect our readers' ability to understand our material, or our editors' ability to write it with a minimum of dispute;
375:
3145:
3090:
3075:
149:
of English usage than the precise language of encyclopedic writing, that the newsy or bloggy stylization is the best or only way to write about the topic in question, and
3591:
3541:
3396:
2688:
2026:
1909:
1789:
599:. When one comes to such a conclusion, one has assembled a methodologically worthless data-set with insufficient resources (e.g. Google News search results), performed a
2828:
2206:
745:
Google Ngrams and its limitations (both in search functionality and in what its corpora contain and how they differ) to extract anything like accurate results out of it.
4124:
2753:
2499:
2236:
2161:
1731:
588:
way per their own house styles. Example: a pop song or fantasy novel given excessive capitalization from following the four-letter rule in journalism, mentioned above.
2808:
897:
Run-together words that are not found in corporate, trademark, and other legal registrations, nor accepted by most sources, just seen as a matter of logo stylization:
4019:
3671:
3516:
3436:
3105:
2854:
2783:
2637:
1934:
1380:– 2013 discussion on applying the Manual of Style to article titles, or doing what the majority of (usually specialized) sources do on a case-by-case basis. Today,
4064:
3621:
2319:
2196:
2086:
1989:
1974:
2201:
1576:
3606:
3576:
3386:
3135:
3130:
2667:
2116:
2071:
2001:
1236:
and its segment on handling references to transgender people, a topic most book-publishing and academic style guides do not address in much detail or at all yet.
4144:
2823:
1029:
Knowledge (XXG)'s editors just have to absorb and live with the fact that they cannot randomly apply conflicting style regimes from unrelated forms of writing.
3919:
2364:
1739:
1453:
1167:
and whether their activities are contributing to or detracting from productivity. Otherwise, the editing community will make this determination on its own and
4004:
1721:
3874:
3749:
1769:
3636:
3351:
2748:
2434:
2216:
2046:
1959:
1561:
1357:
771:
300:
2494:
1711:
4225:
3526:
3486:
3200:
2813:
2733:
2249:
2151:
2081:
1869:
1391:
1377:
4114:
3686:
2869:
3366:
2803:
2549:
2041:
1581:
886:
3165:
3110:
3080:
1551:
484:
style, nor are they general styles, but specific to a particular market segment, subscriber base, or individual publication or blogger. However, the
3834:
3754:
2617:
1196:
507:
1384:
follows the MoS and the naming conventions guidelines (which in turn also agree with MoS), and MoS itself takes into account exceptions when the RS
4312:
4307:
4149:
4119:
3909:
3889:
3446:
3115:
3070:
3065:
2874:
2758:
2662:
2399:
2111:
2056:
2011:
1949:
1919:
1824:
1814:
1586:
3929:
3431:
2031:
1716:
4084:
3959:
3809:
3531:
3227:
3035:
2914:
2763:
2359:
2181:
2131:
1671:
1362:
775:
433:
Recommendations of specialized, often academic, style guides with regard to the handling of particular topics (law, units of measurement, etc.),
296:
1226:
is annual, and many of the other news sites that produce publicly available guides maintain them regularly and for free at their websites, e.g.
4099:
4039:
3964:
3456:
3426:
3346:
3175:
2146:
2136:
2101:
1914:
1819:
1541:
1421:
704:
166:
4139:
4109:
3974:
3949:
3829:
3601:
3060:
2969:
2929:
2833:
2489:
2474:
2349:
1954:
1804:
1759:
1691:
1651:
1501:
1372:
122:
715:
The "apply the style most commonly seen in sources according to my Google searches" idea is completely unworkable (aside from the frequent
47:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
4251:
4079:
4059:
3984:
3979:
3551:
3040:
2683:
2592:
2454:
2389:
2299:
2289:
2264:
2226:
2221:
2156:
1924:
1884:
1829:
1426:
395:
48:
2537:
3155:
2818:
2647:
286:
In rare cases, a name stylization is more like a collection of tattoos, i.e. it's a positive identifier. There is no question that the
4273:
3676:
2964:
2949:
2864:
2439:
1784:
1531:
1526:
1367:
1173:
290:
is the iPhone, not the "Iphone". It will be clear when such a special case applies, specifically because the stylized version will be
4069:
3879:
3849:
3814:
3641:
3120:
3030:
2944:
2587:
2557:
2429:
1611:
663:
604:
519:
A news-style article also often has a "kicker" to draw attention, a "deck" subtitle to hint at the content to come, extensive use of
1706:
4235:
4104:
3934:
3661:
3561:
3371:
3247:
3160:
3125:
3050:
3020:
2884:
2718:
2708:
2657:
2484:
2469:
2394:
2166:
2016:
1646:
1591:
1516:
1446:
1124:
1087:
596:
565:
369:"Every reasonable attempt should be made to ensure that material is presented in the most widely understandable manner possible."
3150:
3045:
3010:
1839:
1406:
4210:
4024:
3939:
3701:
3646:
3566:
3521:
3476:
3471:
3356:
3190:
2985:
2693:
2514:
2294:
2269:
2176:
2171:
2051:
1681:
1596:
1511:
1411:
1056:
1009:
4205:
3401:
3085:
4261:
4034:
3914:
3794:
3769:
3596:
3232:
3195:
3185:
2788:
2728:
2582:
1879:
1854:
1809:
1661:
1636:
1626:
1601:
1248:
For details, see a three-way review of what major style guides recommend about capitalization of prepositions in titles, from
1160:
1098:
584:
426:
420:
4154:
3969:
3854:
3779:
3666:
3586:
3556:
3406:
3025:
2995:
2959:
2849:
2713:
2632:
2414:
2279:
2244:
2091:
1849:
1799:
1794:
1521:
1416:
1291:
1102:
333:
all). While this system is less formal and much less jargonistic both in content and style than the high-academic style of
2577:
1764:
967:
extend to applying such a stylization approach to everything somewhat similar to it. This includes but is not limited to:
808:
Fusion of words or names, when the usage is a legal matter (found in corporate documents, trademark registrations, etc.):
4256:
3844:
3839:
3799:
3784:
3774:
3651:
3496:
2904:
2894:
2793:
2602:
2464:
1749:
1621:
680:
146:
4302:
4230:
4187:
3999:
3864:
3764:
3724:
3681:
3626:
3616:
3611:
3581:
3416:
3391:
3376:
3331:
3217:
2939:
2879:
2612:
2449:
2384:
2379:
2369:
2121:
1744:
1496:
1478:
1439:
1381:
1219:
1137:
625:
387:
40:
1315:
1293:, in which MBA insists on titles which "match the cover art" (something that is often literally impossible, even with
414:
3904:
3859:
3222:
3095:
3055:
2859:
2597:
2126:
1571:
1352:
1192:
1114:
560:
to journal articles, or book titles; there is no special convention for song titles. The idea that there is one is
222:
36:
1222:
is in the handling of fast-moving, controversial usage, because the publication schedule of a paper manual like the
221:(and, obviously, is primarily about the first of these). The five criteria are the actually important parts of the
733:
4134:
4074:
4049:
3989:
3899:
3894:
3481:
3298:
3000:
2990:
2778:
2773:
2191:
1864:
1834:
1666:
979:(this is a style advocated and used by various newspapers, especially in UK, but also including some US ones like
716:
676:
971:
Dropping capitalization on all acronyms pronounceable as words, even when some generally reliable sources do it:
4094:
4044:
3824:
3819:
3789:
3278:
3242:
3237:
2934:
2738:
2572:
2096:
1929:
1904:
1779:
1336:
1253:
1079:
1013:
4089:
3656:
3511:
2924:
2919:
2703:
2622:
2479:
2141:
1037:
1008:(usually because they are publications funded almost entirely by industry advertising, and are thus not fully
712:
own editorial community will take into account when coming to consensus on Knowledge (XXG)'s own house style.
640:
552:); this is the reasonable compromise approach used by Knowledge (XXG), and by most mainstream book publishers.
1546:
1049:
963:
Any exception for a particular case (on the basis of near-universal, cross-genre usage regarding that case)
4029:
3491:
3288:
3212:
2076:
2021:
2006:
1536:
1106:
686:
629:
186:
182:
4129:
3739:
3308:
3283:
3262:
2642:
2274:
2066:
1631:
1083:
1068:
668:
556:(All three systems agree to capitalize any word if it is the first or last word in a title or subtitle.)
474:, as a matter of explicit policy. Very little of MoS is derived from journalistic style guides like the
399:
52:
940:
675:
guideline. So is use of them in reference to that bio subject by high-quality reliable sources, per the
3303:
3293:
3207:
3180:
2444:
1696:
1168:
1094:
198:
194:
62:
104:
consensus, based on general-audience style guides, not mimicry of any particular genre (or trademark).
659:
3759:
2723:
2562:
2459:
1656:
1164:
1032:
All of the following are expected, per applicable policies, from those who write for this project:
916:
of cases for individuals who use it themselves and for whom virtually all sources also use it: for
344:
The conventions of these different types of writing are well-codified in various regularly updated
2899:
2889:
2798:
1462:
1156:
1148:
1120:
32:
1000:
as an excuse, because virtually no professionally produced sources would give it as anything but
2652:
1110:
1045:
959:
Specific exceptions for special cases are not blanket rules for everything superficially similar
737:
703:
The common-style fallacy relies in part upon a key falsehood in the faulty reasoning behind the
600:
1218:
One of the only sectors where journalism style guides have been of use in the formation of the
624:
frequent common-style fallacies on Knowledge (XXG) is the argument, common but unsuccessful at
603:
of this poor data, and then come to a subjective conclusion about it (which the editor usually
441:
us what is best to include in an infobox, how to code Knowledge (XXG) headings properly, etc.).
1227:
3924:
3869:
3015:
2954:
2254:
1133:
1117:
punishment with little process or recourse) have been authorized to deal with such behavior.
749:
190:
699:
Mainstream style guides are the reliable sources for style, and MoS is already based on them
515:
334:
170:
137:) is the flawed reasoning that if a particular typographic stylization turns up commonly in
1328:
1060:
1041:
1005:
728:
The common-style fallacy has additional logic problems that can be dispensed with quickly:
524:
467:
445:
391:
382:
Like all professional-grade publications written by multiple people, Knowledge (XXG) has a
353:
1395:
1064:
1286:
A trade organization called the Music Business Association drafted something called the
1074:
Even if you don't bother to comply with our house style while writing new material, you
925:
690:
349:
4296:
3805:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
798:
Conventionalized capitalization of an acronym some might not have thought of as one:
408:
309:
304:
55:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
1233:
993:
987:
976:
972:
951:
947:
921:
902:
898:
890:
880:
876:
870:
860:
854:
848:
841:
837:
757:
672:
486:
476:
406:
Primarily, the mainstream style guides for general-audience book publishing, like
154:
1001:
997:
936:
932:
917:
823:
819:
813:
809:
803:
799:
793:
787:
783:
782:
Unusual but semantically meaningful capitalization ("intercaps" or "camelcase"):
549:
573:
383:
345:
1392:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Article titles/Archive 50#Stylization of the "common name"
1301:(3rd ed., 2014; D. Kern Holoman; U. of California Press, ISBN 78-0-520-28153-0
1140:, for failure or inability to work within these necessary collaboration norms.
1272:
closely will stick to the academic "capitalize no prepositions" rule, because
520:
511:
471:
338:
818:
Simple substitution of a letter or letters for some other letter or numeral (
138:
3006:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
1378:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Article titles/Archive 40#RfC on COMMONSTYLE proposal
542:
535:
992:
Starting names with lowercase where not universally supported: Some new "
317:
1431:
234:
228:
Our WP:COMMONNAME rubric helps us determine what the name of something
2410:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
1078:
to do so (e.g., do not change others' text to be non-compliant), nor
287:
3692:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
1394:– 2015 failed proposal to effectively shoehorn the style rules into
732:
Search engine results and their order are strongly affected by paid
628:, that an article title with an en dash in it "must" be moved "per
1294:
1136:
from style discussions and from specific content topics, and even
313:
1875:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
765:
142:
4185:
3722:
3329:
2535:
1476:
1435:
1025:
The common-style fallacy can be disruptive enough for sanctions
89:
18:
1353:
Knowledge (XXG):Article titles § Deciding on an article title
3572:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2744:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
2212:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
792:
Conventionalized dropping of capitalization of an acronym:
580:
Trying to "prove" style by search hits is original research
3101:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2910:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2505:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1845:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
1557:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
1316:
Talk:Utada Hikaru/Archive 4#Requested move 22 January 2016
770:
The Manual of Style already has provisions (e.g. at both
3945:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
1138:
indefinitely blocked from editing Knowledge (XXG) at all
935:
for the Network Time Protocol daemon in Unix/Linux, but
3955:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
1388:
use a particular style, so a balance has been achieved.
1332:
1331:) music-related websites' style guides are doing, from
1249:
1163:
over a style matter they don't want to let go of, they
457:"Reliable source" and "news source" are not synonymous,
402:. With regard to the MoS, that consensus is based on:
116:
when ... different disciplines use conflicting styles."
77:
70:
3507:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
3141:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1402:
Knowledge (XXG):Make technical articles understandable
3253:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1890:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
1327:
See, e.g., a detailed review of what various (mostly
1232:. These have thus been useful for parts of MoS like
908:
The special case of "all-lowercase as a stylization"
766:
It's unnecessary anyway: we already have this covered
490:(and its very similar erstwhile competitors like the
341:
of everyday journalism and public-relations writing.
181:
Knowledge (XXG) has a segment of title policy called
165:), it is the flip side, the opposite extreme, of the
3697:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
145:, and other popular publications with a less formal
4244:
4198:
3271:
2978:
2842:
2676:
2548:
2308:
2235:
1730:
1489:
615:, upon which the different genres of writing rely.
275:. (Plus, some other marketing material gave it as "
4216:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3995:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
1617:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
885:Changes that require special markup and may cause
568:with a desire to get an over-capitalizing result (
4318:Knowledge (XXG) essays about Wikipedian fallacies
2187:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
1479:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
869:Jumbled capitalization with no semantic meaning:
534:Capitalize prepositions of four letters or more (
2340:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
2285:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
2037:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
1398:policy itself. The consensus has remained as-is.
1038:abuse Knowledge (XXG) as a platform for activism
632:" because news sources and press releases (i.e.
4015:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3745:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
3422:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
2062:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
1567:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
1358:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Capital letters
1244:
1242:
1174:basic competence for collaborative project work
459:
367:
301:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Capital letters
110:
3442:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
2608:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
2375:Counting and sorting are not original research
4269:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3885:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
2405:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1687:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
1447:
1006:specialist publications that mimic trademarks
983:; it is not catching on and is not used here)
946:It is not accepted for trademarks and logos:
748:The entertainment press in particular is not
8:
3935:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2699:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
2425:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1702:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1677:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
1642:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
1165:need to rethink why they are at this project
3467:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
324:Why the "common style" notion is fallacious
4195:
4182:
4160:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3732:
3719:
3547:Notability is not relevance or reliability
3502:News coverage does not decrease notability
3412:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
3362:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
3339:
3326:
2545:
2532:
2355:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
2330:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1486:
1473:
1454:
1440:
1432:
1363:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Trademarks
525:Knowledge (XXG) has a policy against using
297:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Trademarks
157:. Also more narrowly identifiable as the
4055:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
2345:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1965:Identifying and using independent sources
1422:Knowledge (XXG):Specialized-style fallacy
724:Various other common-style logic problems
508:lead section of a Knowledge (XXG) article
376:WP:Make technical articles understandable
4221:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
3382:Big events make key participants notable
2829:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
2207:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1945:Formatting bilateral relations templates
1373:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style/FAQ
49:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
3632:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
3537:Notability is not a level playing field
3452:How the presumption of notability works
2568:Contributing to complicated discussions
2420:How the presumption of notability works
1940:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1755:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
1427:Knowledge (XXG):Tertiary-source fallacy
1185:
1149:Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines
996:" should not be written that way using
875:"Dingbat" substitutions or insertions:
538:); this is the news journalism extreme.
446:Knowledge (XXG) is not paper publishing
360:Knowledge (XXG) has its own house style
4165:You should not write meaningless lists
3462:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2769:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
2510:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
2335:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1900:Don't hope the house will build itself
1507:All Five Pillars are equally important
1368:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Titles
1264:
1262:
1127:cases about style and article titles.)
1040:about language usage (most especially
3592:One sentence does not an article make
3542:Notability is not a matter of opinion
3258:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
3171:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2689:A weak personal attack is still wrong
2628:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
2260:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
2202:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
2027:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1790:An unfinished house is a real problem
1775:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
1577:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
1229:The Guardian and Observer style guide
1076:must not impede the ability of others
595:be styled just so" leap is forbidden
550:for, in, with, from, Amongst, Between
543:for, in, with, from, amongst, between
536:for, in, With, From, Amongst, Between
356:) publishing for a general audience.
7:
4145:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
4125:Things that should not be surprising
3820:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
3146:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
3091:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
3076:Don't call people by their real name
2824:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
2754:Profanity, civility, and discussions
2162:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
832:It does not extend in any cases to:
605:began with and is seeking to enforce
548:Capitalize if five letters or more (
541:Lowercase all regardless of length (
4020:No one cares about your garage band
4005:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
3672:What is and is not routine coverage
3517:No one cares about your garage band
3437:Existence does not prove notability
2855:Assume the assumption of good faith
2784:There is no Divine Right of Editors
2638:Relationships with academic editors
2500:Why was the page I created deleted?
2495:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
1935:Featured articles may have problems
1722:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
1412:Knowledge (XXG):Tendentious editing
1176:, both on and off Knowledge (XXG).
986:Over-capitalizing titles of works:
4313:Knowledge (XXG) supplemental pages
4308:Knowledge (XXG) essays about style
4065:Please do not murder the newcomers
3622:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
3106:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2320:Adjectives in your recommendations
2197:What an article should not include
2087:The problem with elegant variation
1895:Don't get hung up on minor details
1712:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
1407:Knowledge (XXG):Don't be a fanatic
1299:Writing About Music: A Style Sheet
1169:restrain or expel the troublemaker
772:WP:Manual of Style/Capital letters
564:produced by willful engagement in
335:scientific and humanities journals
53:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
4115:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
3687:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
3387:Businesses with a single location
2668:You have a right to remain silent
2117:Restoring part of a reverted edit
2072:Potential, not just current state
2002:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
1417:Knowledge (XXG):Use our own words
510:has very little in common with a
468:Knowledge (XXG) is not journalism
183:"Use commonly recognizable names"
3136:Don't knit beside the guillotine
3131:Don't ignore community consensus
2365:Confusing arguments mean nothing
1109:, over style and title matters.
653:Cross-language misrepresentation
545:); this is the academic extreme.
93:
22:
16:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
3637:Sources must be out-of-universe
3352:All high schools can be notable
2749:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
2435:Identifying blatant advertising
2217:The world will not end tomorrow
2047:Not everything needs a template
1960:How to write a featured article
1562:Editors will sometimes be wrong
1220:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style
601:personal synthesis and analysis
585:Misuse of online search results
263:of the film; it is not a.k.a. "
195:the five article title criteria
41:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style
4226:Avoid writing redundant essays
3875:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3750:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
3577:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
3527:Notability cannot be purchased
3487:Masking the lack of notability
2250:Copyediting reception sections
2152:Temporary versions of articles
2082:Principle of Some Astonishment
1870:Creating controversial content
1770:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
1717:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
1290:("Final" version, August 2014
1147:As editors, we all agree that
853:This includes small capitals:
37:Knowledge (XXG):Article titles
1:
4252:About policies and guidelines
3367:Articles with a single source
2991:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
2814:Two wrongs don't make a right
2804:The rules of polite discourse
2734:It's not the end of the world
2042:Not everything needs a navbox
1910:Don't "teach the controversy"
1582:Here to build an encyclopedia
776:WP:Manual of Style/Trademarks
427:Fowler's Modern English Usage
421:Garner's Modern English Usage
259:, but this is not really the
4140:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
3835:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3755:Alternatives to edit warring
2618:Maintaining a friendly space
912:This has been accepted in a
4120:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3910:Editing under the influence
3447:Google searches and numbers
3166:Don't template the regulars
3081:Don't call the kettle black
2875:Be excellent to one another
2759:Revert notification opt-out
2663:We are all Wikipedians here
2112:Put a little effort into it
2057:Obtain peer review comments
2012:Introduction to structurism
1950:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1920:Editors are not mindreaders
1825:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1815:Beef up that first revision
1587:Leave it to the experienced
1552:Don't search for objections
1268:Publishers that follow the
1118:
1059:changes you wish to see at
684:
638:
609:The Chicago Manual of Style
569:
452:News style isn't WP's style
415:The Chicago Manual of Style
329:dropping the stylization).
4334:
4150:Why not create an account?
4085:Requirements for adminship
3960:How to vandalize correctly
3930:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3890:Don't delete the main page
3810:Avoid using preview button
3532:Notability comparison test
3116:Don't fight fire with fire
3111:Don't eat the troll's food
3071:Don't call a spade a spade
3066:Don't bludgeon the process
2915:Encourage full discussions
2764:Shadowless Fists of Death!
2400:Don't attack the nominator
2360:But there must be sources!
2182:Try not to leave it a stub
2132:Source your plot summaries
1333:a February 2016 discussion
1288:Music Metadata Style Guide
1250:a February 2016 discussion
1042:not in a "holy war" manner
836:All-capitals for emphasis
734:search engine optimization
451:
279:", among other variants.)
173:and insider publications.
60:
4194:
4181:
4100:Sarcasm is really helpful
4040:Notability is not eternal
3965:How to win a citation war
3735:
3731:
3718:
3427:Every snowflake is unique
3347:Advanced source searching
3342:
3338:
3325:
3228:No, you can't have a pony
3176:Do not insult the vandals
3036:Don't be high-maintenance
2593:Encouraging the newcomers
2544:
2531:
2137:Specialized-style fallacy
2102:Pruning article revisions
1930:Endorsements (commercial)
1915:Editing on mobile devices
1820:Blind men and an elephant
1795:Articles have a half-life
1542:Dissent is not disloyalty
1512:Avoid vague introductions
1485:
1472:
1090:material into compliance.
1050:absolutist prescriptivism
705:specialized-style fallacy
435:when they do not conflict
250:", etc. How the name is
167:specialized-style fallacy
4110:The Night Before Wikimas
3975:Ignore every single rule
3950:How to get away with UPE
3830:Before they were notable
3602:Overreliance upon Google
3397:Common sourcing mistakes
2970:Settle the process first
2930:Imagine others complexly
2834:Writing for the opponent
2809:There is no common sense
2490:Unopposed AFD discussion
2475:Relisting can be abusive
2350:Avoid repeated arguments
1955:Give an article a chance
1805:Avoid mission statements
1765:Advanced text formatting
1760:Advanced article editing
1707:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
1692:The rules are principles
1652:Product, process, policy
1502:Articles must be written
1157:monkey-wrench the system
1103:assumptions of bad faith
664:WP:Neutral point of view
461:and facts aren't style.
265:Alien to the Third Power
223:policy on article titles
169:about narrowly topical,
101:This page in a nutshell:
4245:Policies and guidelines
4080:Requests for medication
4060:Please bite the newbies
3985:Mess with the templates
3552:Notability means impact
3086:Don't call things cruft
3061:Don't be the Fun Police
2870:Avoid the word "vandal"
2819:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
2684:A thank you never hurts
2455:Liar liar pants on fire
2390:Deletion is not cleanup
2300:Writing better articles
2290:Write the article first
2265:Gender-neutral language
2237:Writing article content
2227:Writing better articles
2222:Write the article first
2157:Tertiary-source fallacy
1925:Encourage the newcomers
1885:Dictionaries as sources
1830:Build content to endure
1270:Chicago Manual of Style
1111:Discretionary sanctions
1093:You will not engage in
292:almost universally used
4303:Knowledge (XXG) essays
4274:Policy writing is hard
3980:Is that even an essay?
3677:What notability is not
3432:Existence ≠ Notability
3041:Don't be inconsiderate
2965:Read before commenting
2950:Mind your own business
2865:Avoid personal remarks
2440:Identifying test edits
1785:A navbox on every page
1740:100K featured articles
1537:Concede lost arguments
1532:Competence is required
1463:Knowledge (XXG) essays
1329:user-generated content
660:sport governing bodies
527:, as with news style.
506:differences. Even the
470:and is not written in
463:
371:
123:WT:Manual of Style/FAQ
118:
4070:Pledge of Tranquility
3815:Avoid using wikilinks
3642:Subjective importance
3156:Don't spite your face
2945:Keep it down to earth
2709:Beware of the tigers!
2648:Too long; didn't read
2588:Edit at your own pace
2558:Accepting other users
2325:AfD is not a war zone
1672:There is no seniority
1612:Neutrality of sources
1159:by continually being
1125:Arbitration Committee
1107:casting of aspersions
941:Network Time Protocol
856:Green Mountain Coffee
396:an internal guideline
316:(not "Ke$ ha") – but
51:, as it has not been
4236:Quote your own essay
4105:Sausages for tasting
3880:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3850:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3662:Vanispamcruftisement
3562:Notability sub-pages
3372:Avoid template creep
3332:Essays on notability
3248:There are no oracles
3031:Don't be a WikiBigot
2885:Call a spade a spade
2658:Unblock perspectives
2485:The Heymann Standard
2470:Overzealous deletion
2430:I just don't like it
2167:There is no deadline
2032:"Murder of" articles
1860:Common-style fallacy
1732:Article construction
1647:Process is important
1592:Levels of competence
1517:Be a reliable source
430:, and similar works;
352:of educational (but
299:and (more narrowly)
131:common-style fallacy
4025:No one really cares
3940:Go ahead, vandalize
3702:Two prongs of merit
3647:Third-party sources
3567:Notabilitymandering
3522:No one really cares
3477:Inherent notability
3472:Independent sources
3357:Alternative outlets
3191:Nationalist editing
3161:Don't take the bait
3126:Don't help too much
3051:Don't be prejudiced
3021:Don't be an ostrich
2986:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2719:Deletion as revenge
2694:Advice for hotheads
2515:No Encyclopedic Use
2395:Does deletion help?
2295:Writing about women
2177:The deadline is now
2172:There is a deadline
2052:Nothing is in stone
1682:Tendentious editing
1597:Levels of consensus
1057:indefinitely pursue
1010:independent sources
988:"Do It Like A Dude"
681:WP:Reliable sources
400:editorial consensus
4035:No sorcery threats
3915:Embrace Stop Signs
3795:Assume good wraith
3770:Anti-Wikipedianism
3607:Perennial websites
3597:Other stuff exists
3233:Passive aggression
3196:No angry mastodons
3186:Hate is disruptive
3046:Don't be obnoxious
3011:Don't be a fanatic
2789:Most ideas are bad
2729:Forgive and forget
2538:Essays on civility
2147:Run an edit-a-thon
1880:Deprecated sources
1855:Citation underkill
1840:Chesterton's fence
1810:Be neutral in form
1662:Reasonability rule
1627:Oversimplification
1602:Most ideas are bad
1382:WP:Requested moves
1132:Editors have been
1046:"right" or "wrong"
981:The New York Times
626:WP:Requested moves
388:WP:Manual of Style
320:, not "Deadmaus".
177:How the CSF arises
159:news-style fallacy
4290:
4289:
4286:
4285:
4282:
4281:
4177:
4176:
4173:
4172:
4155:Yes legal threats
3970:Ignore all essays
3855:Complete bollocks
3780:Asshole John rule
3714:
3713:
3710:
3709:
3667:What BLP1E is not
3587:One hundred words
3557:Notability points
3321:
3320:
3317:
3316:
3121:Don't give a fuck
2996:Civil POV pushing
2960:Mutual withdrawal
2850:Assume good faith
2714:Civility warnings
2633:Please say please
2583:Editors' pronouns
2527:
2526:
2523:
2522:
2415:Follow the leader
2280:Use our own words
2245:Avoid thread mode
2092:Pro and con lists
1850:Citation overkill
1800:Autosizing images
1522:Civil POV pushing
1193:WP:Article titles
1084:efforts by others
804:SAGE Publications
597:original research
566:original research
248:Alien: Part Three
108:
107:
88:
87:
4325:
4231:Finding an essay
4196:
4183:
3845:Butterfly effect
3840:Boston Tea Party
3800:Assume stupidity
3785:Assume bad faith
3775:Articlecountitis
3733:
3720:
3652:Trivial mentions
3497:Minimum coverage
3340:
3327:
3026:Don't be ashamed
2905:Discussing cruft
2895:Deny recognition
2794:Nothing is clear
2603:Expect no thanks
2546:
2533:
2465:Nothing is clear
2312:deleting content
1995:Tertiary sources
1750:Acronym overkill
1622:The one question
1487:
1474:
1467:
1456:
1449:
1442:
1433:
1340:
1325:
1319:
1311:
1305:
1284:
1278:
1266:
1257:
1246:
1237:
1216:
1210:
1206:
1200:
1190:
1128:
1099:personal attacks
1003:
999:
995:
989:
978:
974:
953:
949:
938:
934:
923:
919:
904:
900:
899:Baker&Taylor
894:
882:
878:
872:
866:
865:
858:
857:
850:
846:
839:
827:
821:
815:
811:
805:
801:
795:
789:
785:
694:
677:WP:Verifiability
644:
591:Making this "it
572:). It is fandom
571:
570:see next section
551:
544:
537:
516:inverted pyramid
409:New Hart's Rules
378:
125:
97:
96:
90:
80:
73:
26:
25:
19:
4333:
4332:
4328:
4327:
4326:
4324:
4323:
4322:
4293:
4292:
4291:
4278:
4240:
4211:Value of essays
4190:
4169:
4000:Legal vandalism
3865:Counting juntas
3765:Anti-Wikipedian
3727:
3725:Humorous essays
3706:
3682:What to include
3627:Run-of-the-mill
3617:Read the source
3582:Offline sources
3377:Bare notability
3334:
3313:
3267:
3218:No Confederates
3016:Don't be a jerk
2974:
2940:Keep it concise
2880:Beyond civility
2838:
2672:
2613:How to be civil
2578:Don't retaliate
2540:
2519:
2450:Keep it concise
2385:Delete the junk
2380:Delete or merge
2370:Content removal
2304:
2270:Myth vs fiction
2231:
2122:Robotic editing
1985:Science sources
1980:Primary sources
1970:History sources
1745:Abandoned stubs
1726:
1497:Article content
1481:
1468:
1460:
1349:
1344:
1343:
1326:
1322:
1312:
1308:
1285:
1281:
1267:
1260:
1247:
1240:
1217:
1213:
1207:
1203:
1191:
1187:
1182:
1027:
1016:always applies.
1014:WP:Common sense
961:
920:, but not for "
861:
855:
814:GlaxoSmithKline
810:DaimlerChrysler
768:
761:provably false.
726:
701:
655:
582:
512:news-style lede
466:In particular,
464:
458:
454:
380:
373:
366:
362:
326:
312:, and same for
203:recognizability
179:
155:Knowledge (XXG)
127:
120:
94:
84:
83:
76:
69:
65:
57:
56:
39:policy and the
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
4331:
4329:
4321:
4320:
4315:
4310:
4305:
4295:
4294:
4288:
4287:
4284:
4283:
4280:
4279:
4277:
4276:
4271:
4266:
4265:
4264:
4259:
4248:
4246:
4242:
4241:
4239:
4238:
4233:
4228:
4223:
4218:
4213:
4208:
4202:
4200:
4192:
4191:
4186:
4179:
4178:
4175:
4174:
4171:
4170:
4168:
4167:
4162:
4157:
4152:
4147:
4142:
4137:
4132:
4127:
4122:
4117:
4112:
4107:
4102:
4097:
4092:
4087:
4082:
4077:
4072:
4067:
4062:
4057:
4052:
4047:
4042:
4037:
4032:
4027:
4022:
4017:
4012:
4007:
4002:
3997:
3992:
3987:
3982:
3977:
3972:
3967:
3962:
3957:
3952:
3947:
3942:
3937:
3932:
3927:
3922:
3917:
3912:
3907:
3905:Editsummarisis
3902:
3897:
3892:
3887:
3882:
3877:
3872:
3867:
3862:
3860:Counting forks
3857:
3852:
3847:
3842:
3837:
3832:
3827:
3822:
3817:
3812:
3807:
3802:
3797:
3792:
3787:
3782:
3777:
3772:
3767:
3762:
3757:
3752:
3747:
3742:
3736:
3729:
3728:
3723:
3716:
3715:
3712:
3711:
3708:
3707:
3705:
3704:
3699:
3694:
3689:
3684:
3679:
3674:
3669:
3664:
3659:
3654:
3649:
3644:
3639:
3634:
3629:
3624:
3619:
3614:
3609:
3604:
3599:
3594:
3589:
3584:
3579:
3574:
3569:
3564:
3559:
3554:
3549:
3544:
3539:
3534:
3529:
3524:
3519:
3514:
3509:
3504:
3499:
3494:
3489:
3484:
3479:
3474:
3469:
3464:
3459:
3454:
3449:
3444:
3439:
3434:
3429:
3424:
3419:
3417:Don't cite GNG
3414:
3409:
3404:
3399:
3394:
3392:But it's true!
3389:
3384:
3379:
3374:
3369:
3364:
3359:
3354:
3349:
3343:
3336:
3335:
3330:
3323:
3322:
3319:
3318:
3315:
3314:
3312:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3289:WikiHarassment
3286:
3281:
3275:
3273:
3269:
3268:
3266:
3265:
3260:
3255:
3250:
3245:
3240:
3235:
3230:
3225:
3223:No queerphobia
3220:
3215:
3210:
3205:
3204:
3203:
3193:
3188:
3183:
3178:
3173:
3168:
3163:
3158:
3153:
3148:
3143:
3138:
3133:
3128:
3123:
3118:
3113:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3078:
3073:
3068:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2982:
2980:
2976:
2975:
2973:
2972:
2967:
2962:
2957:
2952:
2947:
2942:
2937:
2932:
2927:
2922:
2917:
2912:
2907:
2902:
2897:
2892:
2887:
2882:
2877:
2872:
2867:
2862:
2860:Assume no clue
2857:
2852:
2846:
2844:
2840:
2839:
2837:
2836:
2831:
2826:
2821:
2816:
2811:
2806:
2801:
2796:
2791:
2786:
2781:
2776:
2771:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2751:
2746:
2741:
2736:
2731:
2726:
2721:
2716:
2711:
2706:
2701:
2696:
2691:
2686:
2680:
2678:
2674:
2673:
2671:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2630:
2625:
2620:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2600:
2598:Enjoy yourself
2595:
2590:
2585:
2580:
2575:
2570:
2565:
2560:
2554:
2552:
2542:
2541:
2536:
2529:
2528:
2525:
2524:
2521:
2520:
2518:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2452:
2447:
2442:
2437:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2342:
2337:
2332:
2327:
2322:
2316:
2314:
2311:
2306:
2305:
2303:
2302:
2297:
2292:
2287:
2282:
2277:
2272:
2267:
2262:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2241:
2239:
2233:
2232:
2230:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2127:Sham consensus
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2064:
2059:
2054:
2049:
2044:
2039:
2034:
2029:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1992:
1987:
1982:
1977:
1972:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1947:
1942:
1937:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1917:
1912:
1907:
1902:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1842:
1837:
1832:
1827:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1807:
1802:
1797:
1792:
1787:
1782:
1777:
1772:
1767:
1762:
1757:
1752:
1747:
1742:
1736:
1734:
1728:
1727:
1725:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1639:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1589:
1584:
1579:
1574:
1572:Explanationism
1569:
1564:
1559:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1493:
1491:
1483:
1482:
1477:
1470:
1469:
1461:
1459:
1458:
1451:
1444:
1436:
1430:
1429:
1424:
1419:
1414:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1389:
1387:
1375:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1348:
1345:
1342:
1341:
1320:
1306:
1279:
1258:
1238:
1211:
1209:Corporation").
1201:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1153:
1130:
1129:
1115:administrative
1091:
1072:
1053:
1044:about what is
1026:
1023:
1018:
1017:
990:
984:
966:
960:
957:
956:
955:
944:
929:
926:E. E. Cummings
915:
906:
905:
895:
883:
873:
867:
851:
830:
829:
816:
806:
796:
790:
767:
764:
763:
762:
754:
746:
742:
725:
722:
717:cherry-picking
710:
700:
697:
691:MOS:DIACRITICS
654:
651:
641:WP:IDONTKNOWIT
614:
594:
581:
578:
563:
554:
553:
546:
539:
456:
455:
453:
450:
443:
442:
438:
436:
431:
365:Don't geek out
364:
363:
361:
358:
350:best practices
325:
322:
293:
262:
253:
231:
178:
175:
152:
109:
106:
105:
98:
86:
85:
82:
81:
74:
71:WP:COMMONSTYLE
66:
61:
58:
46:
45:
29:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4330:
4319:
4316:
4314:
4311:
4309:
4306:
4304:
4301:
4300:
4298:
4275:
4272:
4270:
4267:
4263:
4260:
4258:
4255:
4254:
4253:
4250:
4249:
4247:
4243:
4237:
4234:
4232:
4229:
4227:
4224:
4222:
4219:
4217:
4214:
4212:
4209:
4207:
4204:
4203:
4201:
4197:
4193:
4189:
4184:
4180:
4166:
4163:
4161:
4158:
4156:
4153:
4151:
4148:
4146:
4143:
4141:
4138:
4136:
4135:Watchlistitis
4133:
4131:
4130:The WikiBible
4128:
4126:
4123:
4121:
4118:
4116:
4113:
4111:
4108:
4106:
4103:
4101:
4098:
4096:
4093:
4091:
4088:
4086:
4083:
4081:
4078:
4076:
4075:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
4073:
4071:
4068:
4066:
4063:
4061:
4058:
4056:
4053:
4051:
4050:Play the game
4048:
4046:
4043:
4041:
4038:
4036:
4033:
4031:
4028:
4026:
4023:
4021:
4018:
4016:
4013:
4011:
4008:
4006:
4003:
4001:
3998:
3996:
3993:
3991:
3990:My local pond
3988:
3986:
3983:
3981:
3978:
3976:
3973:
3971:
3968:
3966:
3963:
3961:
3958:
3956:
3953:
3951:
3948:
3946:
3943:
3941:
3938:
3936:
3933:
3931:
3928:
3926:
3923:
3921:
3918:
3916:
3913:
3911:
3908:
3906:
3903:
3901:
3900:Edits Per Day
3898:
3896:
3895:Editcountitis
3893:
3891:
3888:
3886:
3883:
3881:
3878:
3876:
3873:
3871:
3868:
3866:
3863:
3861:
3858:
3856:
3853:
3851:
3848:
3846:
3843:
3841:
3838:
3836:
3833:
3831:
3828:
3826:
3823:
3821:
3818:
3816:
3813:
3811:
3808:
3806:
3803:
3801:
3798:
3796:
3793:
3791:
3788:
3786:
3783:
3781:
3778:
3776:
3773:
3771:
3768:
3766:
3763:
3761:
3758:
3756:
3753:
3751:
3748:
3746:
3743:
3741:
3738:
3737:
3734:
3730:
3726:
3721:
3717:
3703:
3700:
3698:
3695:
3693:
3690:
3688:
3685:
3683:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3673:
3670:
3668:
3665:
3663:
3660:
3658:
3655:
3653:
3650:
3648:
3645:
3643:
3640:
3638:
3635:
3633:
3630:
3628:
3625:
3623:
3620:
3618:
3615:
3613:
3610:
3608:
3605:
3603:
3600:
3598:
3595:
3593:
3590:
3588:
3585:
3583:
3580:
3578:
3575:
3573:
3570:
3568:
3565:
3563:
3560:
3558:
3555:
3553:
3550:
3548:
3545:
3543:
3540:
3538:
3535:
3533:
3530:
3528:
3525:
3523:
3520:
3518:
3515:
3513:
3510:
3508:
3505:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3495:
3493:
3490:
3488:
3485:
3483:
3482:Insignificant
3480:
3478:
3475:
3473:
3470:
3468:
3465:
3463:
3460:
3458:
3455:
3453:
3450:
3448:
3445:
3443:
3440:
3438:
3435:
3433:
3430:
3428:
3425:
3423:
3420:
3418:
3415:
3413:
3410:
3408:
3405:
3403:
3400:
3398:
3395:
3393:
3390:
3388:
3385:
3383:
3380:
3378:
3375:
3373:
3370:
3368:
3365:
3363:
3360:
3358:
3355:
3353:
3350:
3348:
3345:
3344:
3341:
3337:
3333:
3328:
3324:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3299:WikiLawyering
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3276:
3274:
3272:WikiRelations
3270:
3264:
3261:
3259:
3256:
3254:
3251:
3249:
3246:
3244:
3241:
3239:
3236:
3234:
3231:
3229:
3226:
3224:
3221:
3219:
3216:
3214:
3211:
3209:
3206:
3202:
3199:
3198:
3197:
3194:
3192:
3189:
3187:
3184:
3182:
3179:
3177:
3174:
3172:
3169:
3167:
3164:
3162:
3159:
3157:
3154:
3152:
3149:
3147:
3144:
3142:
3139:
3137:
3134:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3124:
3122:
3119:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3097:
3096:Don't cry COI
3094:
3092:
3089:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3074:
3072:
3069:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3056:Don't be rude
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
3001:Cyberbullying
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2983:
2981:
2977:
2971:
2968:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2958:
2956:
2953:
2951:
2948:
2946:
2943:
2941:
2938:
2936:
2933:
2931:
2928:
2926:
2923:
2921:
2918:
2916:
2913:
2911:
2908:
2906:
2903:
2901:
2898:
2896:
2893:
2891:
2888:
2886:
2883:
2881:
2878:
2876:
2873:
2871:
2868:
2866:
2863:
2861:
2858:
2856:
2853:
2851:
2848:
2847:
2845:
2841:
2835:
2832:
2830:
2827:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2817:
2815:
2812:
2810:
2807:
2805:
2802:
2800:
2797:
2795:
2792:
2790:
2787:
2785:
2782:
2780:
2779:The last word
2777:
2775:
2774:The grey zone
2772:
2770:
2767:
2765:
2762:
2760:
2757:
2755:
2752:
2750:
2747:
2745:
2742:
2740:
2737:
2735:
2732:
2730:
2727:
2725:
2722:
2720:
2717:
2715:
2712:
2710:
2707:
2705:
2702:
2700:
2697:
2695:
2692:
2690:
2687:
2685:
2682:
2681:
2679:
2675:
2669:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2624:
2621:
2619:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2604:
2601:
2599:
2596:
2594:
2591:
2589:
2586:
2584:
2581:
2579:
2576:
2574:
2571:
2569:
2566:
2564:
2561:
2559:
2556:
2555:
2553:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2534:
2530:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2486:
2483:
2481:
2478:
2476:
2473:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2443:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2433:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2423:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2378:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2366:
2363:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2353:
2351:
2348:
2346:
2343:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2323:
2321:
2318:
2317:
2315:
2313:
2307:
2301:
2298:
2296:
2293:
2291:
2288:
2286:
2283:
2281:
2278:
2276:
2273:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2263:
2261:
2258:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2243:
2242:
2240:
2238:
2234:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2192:Walled garden
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2063:
2060:
2058:
2055:
2053:
2050:
2048:
2045:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2017:Mine a source
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1988:
1986:
1983:
1981:
1978:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1951:
1948:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1938:
1936:
1933:
1931:
1928:
1926:
1923:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1913:
1911:
1908:
1906:
1903:
1901:
1898:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1865:Concept cloud
1863:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1835:Cherrypicking
1833:
1831:
1828:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1811:
1808:
1806:
1803:
1801:
1798:
1796:
1793:
1791:
1788:
1786:
1783:
1781:
1778:
1776:
1773:
1771:
1768:
1766:
1763:
1761:
1758:
1756:
1753:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1737:
1735:
1733:
1729:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1680:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1667:Systemic bias
1665:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1610:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1520:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1475:
1471:
1464:
1457:
1452:
1450:
1445:
1443:
1438:
1437:
1434:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1420:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1397:
1393:
1390:
1385:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1374:
1371:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1324:
1321:
1317:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1289:
1283:
1280:
1275:
1271:
1265:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1245:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1225:
1221:
1215:
1212:
1205:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1189:
1186:
1179:
1177:
1175:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1151:
1150:
1145:
1141:
1139:
1135:
1126:
1122:
1116:
1113:(i.e., swift
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1055:You will not
1054:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1036:You will not
1035:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1024:
1022:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1002:ExistentialOS
994:existentialOS
991:
985:
982:
970:
969:
968:
964:
958:
945:
942:
930:
927:
922:e.e. cummings
913:
911:
910:
909:
896:
893:
888:
887:accessibility
884:
874:
868:
864:
863:Downton Abbey
852:
844:
835:
834:
833:
826:
817:
807:
797:
791:
781:
780:
779:
777:
773:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
730:
729:
723:
721:
718:
713:
708:
706:
698:
696:
692:
688:
687:WP:DIACRITICS
682:
678:
674:
670:
665:
661:
652:
650:
646:
642:
635:
631:
630:WP:COMMONNAME
627:
622:
616:
612:
610:
606:
602:
598:
592:
589:
586:
579:
577:
575:
567:
561:
557:
547:
540:
533:
532:
531:
528:
526:
522:
517:
513:
509:
503:
501:
495:
493:
492:UPI Stylebook
489:
488:
481:
479:
478:
473:
469:
462:
449:
447:
439:
434:
432:
429:
428:
423:
422:
417:
416:
411:
410:
405:
404:
403:
401:
397:
394:, or MoS) is
393:
389:
385:
379:
377:
370:
359:
357:
355:
351:
347:
342:
340:
336:
330:
323:
321:
319:
315:
311:
310:Pink (singer)
306:
302:
298:
291:
289:
284:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
260:
258:
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
229:
226:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
187:WP:COMMONNAME
184:
176:
174:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
150:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
126:
124:
117:
113:
102:
99:
92:
91:
79:
75:
72:
68:
67:
64:
59:
54:
50:
44:
42:
38:
34:
28:
21:
20:
4199:About essays
4188:About essays
4095:Rouge editor
4045:Oops Defense
3825:Barnstaritis
3790:Assume faith
3612:Pokémon test
3457:High Schools
3279:WikiBullying
3243:Superhatting
3238:POV railroad
2935:Just drop it
2739:Nobody cares
2573:Divisiveness
2097:Printability
1990:Style guides
1859:
1780:Amnesia test
1637:Paraphrasing
1386:consistently
1323:
1309:
1298:
1287:
1282:
1273:
1269:
1234:MOS:IDENTITY
1228:
1224:AP Stylebook
1223:
1214:
1204:
1197:lead section
1188:
1146:
1142:
1134:topic-banned
1131:
1123:and related
1097:, including
1031:
1028:
1019:
980:
962:
907:
891:
862:
842:
831:
824:
769:
758:ground truth
741:reliability.
738:undue weight
727:
714:
702:
673:MOS:IDENTITY
669:WP:ABOUTSELF
656:
647:
633:
621:AP Stylebook
620:
617:
613:rule systems
608:
590:
583:
558:
555:
529:
504:
500:AP Stylebook
499:
496:
491:
487:AP Stylebook
485:
482:
477:AP Stylebook
475:
465:
460:
444:
425:
419:
413:
407:
381:
372:
368:
354:non-"how to"
346:style guides
343:
331:
327:
285:
281:
276:
272:
268:
264:
256:
247:
243:
239:
233:
227:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
180:
162:
158:
134:
130:
128:
119:
114:
111:
100:
30:
4206:Essay guide
4090:Rouge admin
3657:Video links
3512:No big loss
3201:just madmen
3151:Don't shout
2925:How to lose
2920:Get over it
2704:Be the glue
2623:Negotiation
2480:Relist bias
2310:Removing or
2142:Stub Makers
1975:Law sources
1905:Don't panic
825:Left 4 Dead
750:independent
679:policy and
671:policy and
574:hand-waving
562:an illusion
521:pull quotes
384:house style
269:Alien Cubed
219:consistency
215:conciseness
207:naturalness
199:WP:CRITERIA
153:be used on
31:This is an
4297:Categories
4262:Guidelines
4030:No, really
4010:LTTAUTMAOK
3492:Make stubs
3213:No racists
2955:Say "MOBY"
2677:Philosophy
2550:The basics
2107:Publicists
2077:Presentism
2022:Merge Test
2007:Inaccuracy
1490:Philosophy
1337:WT:MOSCAPS
1254:WT:MOSCAPS
1161:disruptive
1095:incivility
1069:forum-shop
889:problems:
685:(see also
683:guideline
639:(see also
472:news style
339:news style
305:the singer
238:, versus "
139:newspapers
43:guideline.
3740:Adminitis
3309:WikiPeace
3284:WikiCrime
3263:UPPERCASE
2643:Thank you
2275:Proseline
2067:Permastub
1632:Paradoxes
1547:Don't lie
1121:WP:ARBATC
1086:to bring
1004:, except
918:k.d. lang
244:Alien III
211:precision
63:Shortcuts
4257:Policies
3407:Coatrack
3304:WikiLove
3294:WikiHate
3208:No Nazis
3181:Griefing
2445:Immunity
1697:Trifecta
1527:Cohesion
1347:See also
1082:against
1080:edit-war
1048:in some
965:does not
948:citibank
939:for the
903:JCPenney
845:magazine
820:Deadmau5
318:Deadmau5
252:stylized
240:Aliens 3
171:academic
147:register
3920:Emerson
3760:ANI flu
2724:Failure
2563:Apology
2460:Nothing
1657:Purpose
1277:38–39).
1052:sense).
943:itself.
924:" (see
914:handful
877:E*trade
849:The GAP
794:Nabisco
273:Alien 3
235:Alien 3
232:, e.g.
191:WP:UCRN
3402:Clones
2979:Don'ts
2900:Desist
2890:Candor
2799:Reader
1088:"your"
1061:WP:MOS
973:Unesco
788:CentOS
514:. The
392:WP:MOS
386:. Our
288:iPhone
267:" or "
217:, and
78:WP:CSF
2653:Truce
1396:WP:AT
1295:CSS 3
1180:Notes
1119:(See
1105:, or
1065:WP:AT
952:sears
892:Alien
881:C|net
314:Kesha
277:ALI3N
257:Alien
143:blogs
33:essay
3925:Fart
3870:Crap
2255:Coup
1607:Need
1274:CMoS
977:Nasa
933:ntpd
871:ebaY
843:TIME
838:SONY
800:IKEA
784:iPod
774:and
756:The
709:must
689:and
593:must
261:name
246:", "
242:", "
151:must
129:The
2843:Dos
1466:(?)
1335:at
1252:at
1152:are
1071:it.
998:iOS
937:NTP
201:):
189:or
163:NSF
135:CSF
35:on
4299::
1261:^
1241:^
1101:,
1063:,
975:,
950:,
928:).
901:,
879:,
859:,
847:,
840:,
822:,
812:,
802:,
786:,
695:.
634:AP
576:.
502:.
424:,
418:,
412:,
374:–
230:is
213:,
209:,
205:,
141:,
121:–
1455:e
1448:t
1441:v
1339:.
1318:.
1256:.
1199:.
954:.
828:)
693:)
643:)
390:(
197:(
185:(
161:(
133:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.