Knowledge (XXG)

:Copyright problems/2021 February 18 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

214:
reply, since that seems to be the process. I can only speculate but I think they will almost certainly be happy for the data to be made made available here, since they encourage sharing of the index on their webpage. It would also seem sensible to me to bring in the opinion of others so that going forward there is more certainty about the copyright situation for lists such as these; however, I'm not at all experienced with editing Knowledge (XXG) so that would be a task for someone else.
404: 341: 80:
that it calculated. The URL you've given, as an html file, shows nothing. If some of the javascript is enabled in addition to the html itself, then the 2020 rankings are listed in what to me looks like a completely different format to that in the Knowledge (XXG) article. You should revert your edit.
75:
a copyright violation, at least not between the Knowledge (XXG) article and the URL you've given. The data content of tables cannot be copyrighted. What is copyrightable is the particular style of presenting the data. The fact that RSF used its criteria to arrive at the rankings does not give it any
56:
and prior ranking tables from the website. Since they use their own criteria as to how to arrive at the rankings, the resulting list is copyright. For this type of list we usually only show the top ten, or perhaps for a list of this type we might show the top ten for each year or even a few from the
198:
Even though lists can be copyrighted and RSF claims to "copyright" the data, what they're actually doing is promoting users to help share the data online and in print form (including Knowledge (XXG)) and the creativity of the list is irrelevant to copyright, so I think that the ranking table should
213:
Since there seems to have been no progress on this issue and the page still has a clunky copyright notice I have taken the liberty to actually contact RSF in a personal capacity for clarification on whether they are happy for the data to be shared. I will escalate to a copyright clerk if/when they
95:
The people who create the index select unique criteria to do so. Creativity has gone into producing the list by selecting which facts are included in the resulting rankings. It goes far beyond a numerical listing of facts, and therefore enjoys copyright protection in my opinion.—
292:
and I have been editing international rankings-related articles in Ukrainian Knowledge (XXG) for a while. I wonder if the administrators came to any conclusion about this case since Knowledge (XXG) has a lot of articles with a full list of countries (example:
145:
Simple lists that do not contain any creative content are not considered copyrightable - for example a list of organizations or a chronological list of guests on a TV show. Subjective lists should not be copied verbatim. Articles such as
118:
the information presented in Knowledge (XXG). Newspapers are assumed to do fact-checking: that's not just straight-forward bureaucracy, it requires thinking, creativity and work. Copyright is about the resulting
309:
without discussion is strange to me, considering the fact that Wikipedias are full of such articles with full list of countries and then they should be removed too. Hope to hear any updates about this case.—
247: 114:
the index is completely irrelevant to copyright. Copyright is about the particular style of presenting information. Creativity by the people preparing the sources underlies almost
151: 147: 229: 154:
show top ten only. This article is a similar example of that concept, because of the creativity that has gone into the selection criteria.—
57:
top ten and bottom ten for each year. I have listed the article here so that interested editors will have time to modify the article.—
251: 127:
that goes into producing it.To consider this as a copyright violation would imply that the WMF should quickly delete the whole of the
323:
I'm not necessarily convinced that this is a copyvio, but I've removed the table and converted it into a Top 10 list as suggested. –
228:
If they wish for the list to be copied here, it would need to be released under a compatible license, via an OTRS ticket. See
169: 17: 177: 379: 181: 393: 277: 47: 389: 366: 414: 397: 356: 332: 318: 314: 281: 255: 241: 223: 208: 193: 163: 140: 131:
project before someone notices that it exists. I strongly recommend that you revert the copyright notice.
105: 90: 66: 305:
and so on) and somehow administrators never found any copyrighting there before. Removal of the table by
289: 272:
These rankings are factual information and their inclusion does not, in my opinion, violate copyright. ~
273: 204: 189: 329: 34: 173: 298: 294: 219: 352: 237: 159: 101: 62: 200: 185: 310: 302: 325: 246:
That doesn't address the point that it's not a copyright violation in the first place.
136: 86: 215: 348: 306: 233: 155: 97: 58: 411: 132: 82: 128: 385: 182:
When Lists, Directories, and Databases Have No Copyright Protectio
53: 388:. Seems like the material was copied in 2014 and no one noticed. 347:
by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. —
410:
by investigator or others. No remaining infringement.
375: 371: 43: 39: 152:Forbes list of The World's 100 Most Powerful Women 148:Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time 8: 248:2600:8806:409:5600:4801:6597:E870:C932 7: 24: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Copyright problems 386:http://georgetwalker.com/bio.html 178:Lists, Directories, and Databases 402: 339: 230:WP:Donating copyright materials 54:https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2020 1: 415:19:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC) 398:23:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 224:01:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC) 209:19:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 194:22:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 164:22:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 141:19:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 106:23:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 91:23:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 67:13:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 433: 357:01:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC) 333:16:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC) 282:00:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC) 256:17:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC) 242:14:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC) 319:08:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC) 290:Ukrainian Knowledge (XXG) 367:George Walker (composer) 232:for more information.— 176:. Other resources are: 110:The creativity used in 390:somethingintheshadows 288:Greetings. I am from 170:WP:Copyright in lists 172:, although it is an 35:Press Freedom Index 299:Good Country Index 295:Global Peace Index 76:copyright on the 424: 406: 405: 383: 343: 342: 123:, not about the 51: 28:18 February 2021 432: 431: 427: 426: 425: 423: 422: 421: 408:Article cleaned 403: 369: 345:Article cleaned 340: 303:Democracy Index 37: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 430: 428: 420: 419: 418: 417: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 336: 335: 321: 285: 284: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 211: 196: 166: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 429: 416: 413: 409: 401: 400: 399: 395: 391: 387: 381: 377: 373: 368: 365: 364: 358: 354: 350: 346: 338: 337: 334: 331: 328: 327: 322: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 291: 287: 286: 283: 279: 275: 271: 270: 257: 253: 249: 245: 244: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 226: 225: 221: 217: 212: 210: 206: 202: 199:be restored. 197: 195: 191: 187: 184:and so on.―― 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 143: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 117: 113: 109: 108: 107: 103: 99: 94: 93: 92: 88: 84: 79: 74: 70: 69: 68: 64: 60: 55: 49: 45: 41: 36: 33: 32: 29: 26: 19: 407: 344: 324: 124: 120: 115: 111: 77: 72: 27: 201:Bsslover371 186:Phoenix7777 311:Ivgemytlig 278:talk to me 376:last edit 44:last edit 326:Thjarkur 216:SageMint 129:Wikidata 112:creating 71:This is 380:rewrite 372:history 349:Diannaa 307:Diannaa 234:Diannaa 156:Diannaa 98:Diannaa 78:numbers 59:Diannaa 48:rewrite 40:history 330:(talk) 412:MER-C 384:from 274:El D. 174:essay 52:from 16:< 394:talk 353:talk 315:talk 252:talk 238:talk 220:talk 205:talk 190:talk 168:See 160:talk 150:and 137:talk 133:Boud 125:work 121:text 102:talk 87:talk 83:Boud 63:talk 116:all 73:not 396:) 378:· 374:· 355:) 317:) 301:, 297:, 280:) 254:) 240:) 222:) 207:) 192:) 180:, 162:) 139:) 104:) 89:) 65:) 46:· 42:· 392:( 382:) 370:( 351:( 313:( 276:( 250:( 236:( 218:( 203:( 188:( 158:( 135:( 100:( 85:( 61:( 50:) 38:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Copyright problems
18 February 2021
Press Freedom Index
history
last edit
rewrite
https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2020
Diannaa
talk
13:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Boud
talk
23:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Diannaa
talk
23:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Wikidata
Boud
talk
19:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
Forbes list of The World's 100 Most Powerful Women
Diannaa
talk
22:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:Copyright in lists
essay
Lists, Directories, and Databases
When Lists, Directories, and Databases Have No Copyright Protectio
Phoenix7777

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.