Knowledge

:Cross-reference - Knowledge

Source 📝

21: 67:
except that it would lists several target pages among which the reader may choose. It was supposed to exist when there were at least two candidate target pages and none of them alone sufficed, or when there were at least two that deserved inclusion as possibilities for the reader to consider.
106:
Many pages was supposed to be able to link to a cross-reference page. Normally no pages (except redirects and occasionally other disambiguation pages) should link to a disambiguation page except via a disambiguating
100:
A disambiguation page links to various articles about possibly unrelated topics known by the same name. A cross-reference page was supposed to link to articles related to just one topic identified in the page's
71:
A cross-reference page was supposed to have a list of two or more links to articles on related topics that shed light on the concept identified in the article's title. For example,
120: 54: 83:
described the concept but in different aspects, and it was believed that it would be confusing with a third article instead of a cross-reference page.
163: 80: 43: 28: 72: 39: 38:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
88: 138: 148: 95:
Not all, and possibly none, of the topics were supposed to be called by the name that is the article's title.
55:
Knowledge talk:Policies and guidelines/Archive 13#Accepting "WP:Multiple-cross-reference page" as a guideline
123:, cross-references are not to be used in Knowledge, and alternatives should be used instead, such as: 127: 35: 143: 64: 111:
It was also not supposed to be a glossary: it didn't need to define the terms that it listed.
76: 157: 133: 63:
refers to a previously proposed concept whose objective was to be like a
15: 75:
was a cross-reference page, with the motivation that both
8: 7: 81:Health risks of professional dance 14: 19: 73:Professional dancing and health 1: 180: 164:Knowledge failed proposals 119:According to the relevant 52: 134:Stand-alone list article 42:or initiate a thread at 128:Broad-concept article 89:disambiguation pages 139:Set index article 87:Differences from 51: 50: 171: 77:Dance and health 44:the village pump 23: 22: 16: 179: 178: 174: 173: 172: 170: 169: 168: 154: 153: 117: 115:Recommendations 92: 61:cross-reference 57: 47: 20: 12: 11: 5: 177: 175: 167: 166: 156: 155: 152: 151: 149:Disambiguation 146: 141: 136: 131: 130:("dabconcept") 116: 113: 109: 108: 103: 102: 97: 96: 91: 85: 49: 48: 34: 33: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 176: 165: 162: 161: 159: 150: 147: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 129: 126: 125: 124: 122: 114: 112: 105: 104: 99: 98: 94: 93: 90: 86: 84: 82: 78: 74: 69: 66: 65:redirect page 62: 56: 45: 41: 40:the talk page 37: 32: 30: 25: 18: 17: 118: 110: 70: 60: 58: 53:Discussion: 26: 121:discussion 27:This is a 36:Consensus 31:proposal. 158:Category 144:Redirect 107:hatnote. 101:title. 29:failed 79:and 160:: 59:A 46:.

Index

failed
Consensus
the talk page
the village pump
Knowledge talk:Policies and guidelines/Archive 13#Accepting "WP:Multiple-cross-reference page" as a guideline
redirect page
Professional dancing and health
Dance and health
Health risks of professional dance
disambiguation pages
discussion
Broad-concept article
Stand-alone list article
Set index article
Redirect
Disambiguation
Category
Knowledge failed proposals

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.