Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (proposals)

2279:(XXG) editions for Svan language and Laz language. These two languages belong to the Kartvelian language family and are written in Georgian script, however they aren't mutually intelligible with each other and also with Georgian and Mingrelian. If they will be added, each of these four branch speakers of the Kartvelian language will have a better opportunity to learn more these languages belonging to the Kartvelian language family, and also these two new Knowledge (XXG) editions will have their own articles which they will belong to the article scope of the regions where these languages are spoken. In addition, the other visitors from different parts of the world will learn about these languages. Please add these two Knowledge (XXG) editions as they are old languages spoken in Georgia, which is an ancient country with rich history and culture. I would be so happy if you will take my request into consideration. 1894:), there may well be a way to have a pageviews chart on the Talk page. If you'd rather have the link, then carry on, I guess, but it looks like you are running into a lot of opposition to that approach. My impression is that by continuing to grind away at it, you are doing yourself a disservice and possibly pushing your goal of having easy access to a chart even further away. The more you insist on a link, the more you may also gin up opposition to having the chart, and I haven't raised that idea more formally yet because this discussion has sucked up all the oxygen in the room about this topic and may have also poisoned the well a bit. Please don't make things worse than they already are. I think you are more likely to get what you want, if you let it be for a while, or at least, wait and see if there's a groundswell of support here for your links ideas, which so far has not materialized. 5021:

with the votes that say that that article shouldn't have "Walmart" in the title because other articles don't, as that argument seems like it directly contradicts the "disambiguator" part of WP:CONSISTENT. Ultimately, it depends on what the consensus will be as to whether, for that particular article, in the inclusion of "Walmart" would better match title criteria, e.g. because it's part of the common name. So there's no clear "right answer," it's a matter of how the people participating in the discussion will weigh the various competing factors involved.

1197:

discouraged. Metrics that might align better with your own values (e.g., how grateful a reader was to find information on such an obscure topic) are not available and will not be surfaced to you. We're just going to tell you that 40% of your articles are probably pointless. Or 70%, if you thought one reader a day was enough. Or 90%, if you'd hoped your efforts would help "only" 10 readers a day. My point is, for most articles, this is not a feel-good metric. This is a feel-bad metric, and we should be cautious about promoting it indiscriminately.

1750: 2787:. New name is more verbose, lacking concision. The idea of rebranding something to fix its problems is a bit questionable. For example on meta they tried this with the community wishlist this year and the community made it clear that they preferred the old name. Is the fundamental problem with ITN really its name and the fact that it focuses on topics that are "in the news", or is its core problem actually something else such as toxicity, which might not be addressed by a name change? – 512: 3303:- Like others, a name change/small proposal like this is premature imo. A comprehensive way forward for the main page section in question - including not only changes to processes/procedures/policies/etc. but to the name should be fleshed out before small changes like this are proposed. Trout the nominator because while it looks like this was in good faith, it was premature given RFCBEFORE discussion ongoing. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | 2013:, so to get through to you I need to be a bit more blunt than I like to be. The goal of making pageview links more easily accessible has been rejected by most people commenting above. To you these links are very important, but to most people they are not. Stop trying to find ways of forcing these links on people who don't want them and just find a way to have them yourself. 2348:

opportunity to create the articles. If your hope is "I'll suggest this, and someone else will do all the work", then you will be disappointed. The process that is likely to work is the one that sounds a lot more like "I've got a dozen friends who speak these languages natively and would love to spend several hours per week, for the next decade, working on this".

5044: 4957: 500: 2573:: Contrary to the others, I think that a name change—even by itself, only—could be a bit less misleading to newcomers, especially those who come to WP going "why isn't this news here?".I do feel like it would be better to just rename it to "Current events" if possible, as this name is indeed too verbose. To solve the conflict with the portal, just add a 4877:". In my view, if it doesn't have a common name, it should be as short (WP:CONCISE) as possible, using only those descriptors that are needed to be precise. So: " shooting" is fine unless there were two shootings in that year or place. In fact, " shooting" would be better in my view, unless there were multiple shootings at . 1911:. I now prefer a pageviews link in a submenu of the Tools menu that is currently found on all pages whether logged in or not. I like how submenus condense the page menu. The tools menu has no submenus and one has to scroll down the page to see all the contents. So it solves 2 problems to add submenus to the tools menu. 3687:". Editors who show that they have tons of time for Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't expose themselves by saying that clearly deficient articles are worthy of being linked from the Main Page simply because the formatting has been prettied up. Yet, it's been going on for years and concerns fall on deaf ears. 4935:

In regard to adding brand names/private businesses, this is already a well-established concept both on Knowledge (XXG) and in reliable sources. The vast majority of school shooting articles will include the name of the school, which I'd argue is far more damaging than just naming "Walmart". Certainly

3503:

I think that's incorrect. There's a wide ranging discussion about changing ITN right now and you should have weighed in there and helped to workshop instead of running here to start an RfC—which may very well become moot depending on what comes out of the ongoing discussion. I would boldly close this

1319:

And by definition, any user interface design makes a determination of what's important or not important. People use Talk more than, say, What links here, so it makes sense that the former is more prominent. In such a wide-ranging and community-focused project like Knowledge (XXG) there's always going

1281:

I actually do pay attention to page views for articles I work on, but I am comfortable going to the page history to access them. Very low page views for a given article can be disappointing, but every once-in-a-while something in the news will cause a hundred- or thousand-fold spike in page views for

3582:

We should absolutely shy away from asking the community to comment, to provide their thoughts, about something, because people's time is limited and valuable. We should ask for that time sparingly. Not every idea we have deserves the formal attention of an RFC, and there are specific places to go to

1921:

is only on less than 1% of all article talk pages (53,000 / 7,000,000 articles). I support your efforts to make it work again. But I want more. I hope to contact whoever is involved with the Tools menu directly. That may be more productive. The feedback from this discussion has been useful in seeing

4368:

to add a class parameter to the module, so that users may opt to hide certain message boxes from view when logged in. The issue of banner clutter on Talk pages is one that perennially pops up and frequently raises tensions among those who support or oppose such banners. This proposal is *not* about

2976:

The most precise wording in the spirit of the current name would be "From the current events". Anyway, the name change won't solve a problem because there's no problem at all. We have a section called "Did you know...", which "showcases new or expanded articles that are selected through an informal

2278:

I have a proposal. Please can you consider to add two Kartvelian languages of Georgia and neighboring countries spoken as a minority, which are written in Georgian script and are missing on Knowledge (XXG) like there are Georgian and Mingrelian. I want from one of the admins to create two Knowledge

2912:

I think the newly proposed name departs from the format of the ITN section. Note that "news" is information about "current events". We post blurbs that summarise news. To me, "Articles featuring current events" sounds like posting links to articles that document current events. That's not what the

1977:

are not direct links to pageviews for a page. I meant "need" in the sense that for this to work, the pageviews link "needs" to be on the page view menu or submenus. Currently, it is not there. Thanks for the info about the Xtools menu gadget not being on mobile. Another reason not to use Xtools as

1299:

I assume now that this is why page views has been made so inaccessible to regular readers and editors. I make decisions on what and how I edit based on numerous factors, including page views. Maybe you have unlimited time to edit. I don't, and so I want to edit what I think makes a difference, and

1230:

Though I agree that page views can be surprisingly low sometimes, I think your methodology is possibly flawed; editors don't just edit random articles. I would imagine that articles that are edited more tend to get more views, as there is most likely some overlap between reader interest and editor

5020:

But ultimately, titles are decided very much on a case-by-case basis (in large part because a common name analysis is a case by case analysis), so who knows what the consensus will be at that particular RM about the best title for that particular article. Right now I see it's split 2-2. I'd argue

3555:

And - in my opinion anyway - we should never shy away from asking the community to comment, to provide their thoughts, about something. Especially not out of fear that some individuals might come along and try to derail the discussion, rather than discuss the matters at hand. I have faith in the

2059:

Phil Bridger wrote: "The goal of making pageview links more easily accessible has been rejected by most people commenting above." As a point of fact that is incorrect. Most people haven't expressed an opinion. 3 people support the link in the tools menu. 3 are opposed. But I agree that discussion

1462:

has a self-contradiction in it. It's hard enough to get someone to edit that article. I don't need "help" in the form of you scaring away editors because you've made sure that they know how many people will see that edit. I very much need "editors thinking about the work that needs to be done,

3972:

I'm not an ITN regular. If you'd read the two discussions that preceded this one, you'd know I tried participating in ITN once and was so turned off I've only commented there a couple of times since. I want this to go somewhere, hopefully to fix ITN for the better. Rushing into an RfC before the

3533:

3457:

Same, there's been RFCBEFORE discussions on the ITN talk page following the AN discussion about an RFC to reevaluate aspects of ITN which have been going on for a few days, and this seems to be jumping the gun. I recommend this be shuttered and ideas held off until the planned RFC is ready to go

1882:

Time, Can you clarify what it is you actually want? A great deal of words have been expended here about adding a *pageviews link*, as in your message just above and many other parts of this multi-section discussion, but is a link what you really want? Or would you rather just have the page views

1867:

The previous talk sections clearly show that this goal is not one that everybody supports, indeed some people have actively opposed adding links to the page menu. There is currently no consensus that we should increase the accessibility of the page views tool at all, nor for a specific way to do

1258:

The opposite is also true: if you happen to be impressed with the page views an article is getting, then you might feel the stakes are much higher. There can be no compromise when so many people are going to read this, right? Everything's got to be perfect. Don't be bold; be very, very, very

3678:

The toxicity of ITN is a legitimate concern, even if it's been given only minimal weight here. Anything having to do with formulating Main Page content should reflect a broad cross-section of the community. ITN is not that, but rather a small group of editors engaging in behavior bordering on

3119:"in the news". Almost everything nominated for ITN is already posted in that day's Current events section and the majority of what's posted to ITN (invariably undated) stays up well after its currency expires. If ITN storylinks should ever become as current as CE storylinks, such a similar name 3097:

per Czello. The problem with ITN is not the name or the theme, it's the fact that the discussions are too slow and rambling to produce punctual postings while things remain in the news. (It would also be good to get a clearer steer on subject matter - culture topics other than deaths are rarely

2807:

I think it could be said that at least some of that "toxicity" (to use your word) might be due to the unsaid expectations of commenters when they come to a discussion about topics "in the news". Changing the name can change that expectation and tone. And besides, the name "in the news" doesn't

2724:

The idea of doing some RFCBEFORE before launching a T:CENT RFC is a good one, I think. A smaller group discussion can help figure out what the most likely options to pass are in a big RFC, and then just present those, which is a nice optimization that reduces friction and saves editor time and

2690:

RfCs are meant to have a clear question that editors can answer. That's why the RFCBEFORE requirement exists: so that editors can talk it out, try to come to a consensus, and when all else fails, narrow the dispute so that uninvolved editors can help answer a clear-cut qurstuon via RfC. Citing

2347:

It might be helpful to be clearer about that process: If you want Knowledge (XXG) articles in those languages, then 99% of the time, you will have to do the writing/translation work yourself. There is no secret group of people here that is skilled in those languages and just waiting for the

1196:

Please imagine for a moment that you have created an article, or you decided to improve it. Then you look on the talk page and discover that the number of page views is far lower than you expected. A metric that never really mattered to you before has been put in your face, and now you feel

2099:

It's not about me. That's projection on the part of you two. But hey, I've said what I've got to say. I made some suggestions. I answered questions. I answered your question. I wasn't sure you had seen my question. Of course, you don't have to answer mine. I didn't badger others to answer my

4537:

When looking at other categories for attacks on indoor places in the United States, the vast majority either include the name of the business or the type of venue in their name. For example, see the following where the majority of titles include the names of the businesses or type of venue:

1598:

Only logged in users see the statistics bar. Turning it on by default would allow all logged in users to see it. If they don't like it they can always turn it off. But if they never turn it on, they will not know that it has a page views link. That is why it should be turned on by default.

716:

I don't feel that Page views is that much more important than the other external tools linked in page information and page history. Personally, I use Revision history statistics more. Obviously adding them all would be too much clutter though, so I wouldn't propose that as an alternative. ―

4883:

I don't think we should ever add the brand name of the private business ("Walmart", "Buffalo Topps") where a shooting occurred, unless it's part of the common name (as with the Pulse shooting). It's not nice or necessary to associate the business with a shooting that happened at one of its

2486:

In multiple discussions, the regulars there appear to be defending the process as a way for the encyclopedia to feature articles. Well, if that's the purpose, then let's call it that, and sidestep all the baggage that the word "news" can carry with it. - 12:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

1539: 3036:

as the page isn't called "the news" (as it seems OP framed that's how it's being presented), it's called "in the news"; as in, "here are articles whose topics are currently in the news". I think renaming the page would be a blunt instrument to fix policy issues (if it even does). —

3567:

Asking the community to comment and provide thoughts about something is a good thing, but (a) that's what's happening at WT:ITN, and (b) that's not what an RFC is - an RFC is a specific question with a finite number of answers with the aim of generating consensus for one them.

3683:, several of whom repeatedly show a frightening detachment from reality. I've repeatedly expressed concerns about the false notion of "article quality" WRT recent deaths that certain editors push down everyone's throats. It's yet another manifestation of Knowledge (XXG) as " 2523:

articles about current events, not decide what to feature based on perceived newsworthiness. Noting that a name change alone without underlying changes wouldn't fix much of the issues, so I wish it would come along with a fundamental change in how the articles are selected.

5016:

disambiguator doesn't mean every country article must have one, even though that would be consistent. I think there is a direct analogy here to "Walmart": just because some articles identify the name of the business doesn't mean all articles should identify the name of the

3272:"In the news". News is a superset of current "newsy" events, and such a new title would at least weed out some stuff. I see no reason this could go wrong, except potential whiplash if the current WT:ITN discussions suddenly watershed into a radically different direction. 1678:

I don't think these statistics are relevant to the average reader. Or average editor really, I can count the amount of times that I've looked up any of these statistics for the last twenty pages I've edited on zero hands. The same is most likely true for the last two

2713:. So yes, NOTBURO applies. And a simple question of renaming? That's pretty clear cut. Alternate rename suggestions are proposed in rename discussions all the time. So I'm not sure what you find so "ridiculous". Anyway, this is a tangent to the discussion itself. - 1356:

novov: Now your veering into ridiculousness. As I previously said average readers and editors are more interested in page views than other statistics. And elsewhere you said you want page views in a separate template, and not as 2 words (Daily pageviews) added to

1457:

to promote page views. You are proposing that 90% of talk pages carry "proof" that those articles are unimportant. That will not make editors feel happy. It will not make them feel like contributing more. In some cases, it will scare them away from editing.

1778:

Unless the tools menu gets some submenus, then I like this solution best of all so far. It avoids any possible server problems (see previous talk section) since it does not show the statistics. And the page menu is short. So there is room for a pageviews link.

5071:), and having some little hint would sometimes be helpful. The use case I'm specifically thinking of is when you're searching for an article. However, I don't feel strongly about this, and I oppose making them all match just for the sake of matching. 4485:

If you change your browser configuration, you can set up any font you want to be used when a web page uses the generic sans-serif CSS property. If you want to do something specific to English Knowledge (XXG), see the web page to which RoySmith referred.

2977:

review process". Shall we change it to "From the new and expanded articles" just to better match the mission statement of DYK? I think there should be some aesthetics on the main page, and "In the news" and "Did you know..." are names that provide it.--

1323:

The closest thing to letting people decide for themselves would be if we just make every action associated with a page buttons of the exactly the same size that are always visible, which would be unbearably cluttered and intimidating to newcomers. ―

1883:

chart itself on the Talk page? I suspect your underlying goal is the same as mine, as I get the impression that you'd rather have the chart but have given up on that idea because it hadn't worked in over a year and was finally hidden recently.

4369:

arguing either side of it; the sole objective is to offer alternatives so as to reduce the strife, and as much as feasible, allow everyone to have the Talk page appearance they prefer. I hope this proposal may provide that. Your feedback at

1493:

would be a more efficient way of finding popular articles than clicking on each talk page, but if you like clicking on each page individually, then feel free to click away. What I'm saying is: Don't force your preference on everyone else.

3738:. This proposal is ill-formed, will not result in any kind of useable consensus, and we should wait for a workshopped proposal regarding other reforms to ITN to be completed and put up for RfC before changing its name. This is putting the 2832:

per Novem Linguae. The problem is not the name, and even if it were the new name wouldn't resolve the misunderstandings about what the purpose of the section is (or trying to turn it into what they, but most other editors do not, think it

417: 412: 3178:. Even changing the name to “Current events” is unnecessary, since the phrase “in the news” directly implies that the section is about current events. “Articles for current events” is an even worse name, since it’s unnecessarily long. 3410:- We do indeed present links to articles with content about things are "in the news" on this part of the main page. We are highly selective and have unique criteria (much different than a traditional news source), but nonetheless. 1254:

I agree that editor interest is non-random, but that means it will be worse than average for some editors. If your niche happens to be an unpopular one, then you could find yourself looking at evidence of its unpopularity very

5068: 3157:. From what I can see, this doesn't really have any tangible benefit, but it makes the title of the ITN page substantially longer. I do think behavior at ITN could be improved, but this feels like, to put it bluntly, putting 750:

Concerning revision history, I assume you are talking about the "View history" link at the top of nearly all pages? I agree that is very important. But we are not asking for the page views link to be put at the top of pages.

2044:) has been (hopefully) resolved. As for me, I've contributed here all I can, and I am withdrawing from this discussion now, as further comments would either be counter-productive, or prolong it unnecessarily. Best of luck, 1940:

I hadn't read the previous sections as it happens: the edit summary on my watchlist made it appear as if this were a new topic. I'm afraid I'm inclined to agree this doesn't have consensus, and just wondering why this is a

4314:

that "Current events" is better than "In the news" because it refocuses the space toward Knowledge (XXG)'s quality content on current events, rather than whichever Knowledge (XXG) content aligns with the news reporting.

4438:

Knowledge (XXG) doesn't specify the font being used for article text; it uses whatever you have configured in your browser for sans-serif text. So feel free to configure your favourite font for use in your browser.

778:. What I'm saying is that there's no reason why page views should be added to the tools menu when it's not been proven that it's "special" compared to the other things, and page information is in there anyway. ― 2518:

It's a good thing to have a section on the Main Page featuring current events-related articles, as it helps show that the encyclopedia is kept up-to-date and engaging, but the key criterion should be to feature

1158:

Oh, I see; should be pretty straightforward with a new param. If only we had a magic word for the id of the user reading the page, instead of the last one who saved it, we could do it without a param, but alas.

2964:

If it's confusing, then I think we should probably fix that. Something typically done in either changing the mission statement or the name. I'm proposing changing the name to match the mission statement. -

2837:

be). I also agree that this should have been workshopped first as there are very probably better alternatives to the one suggested (that still wouldn't solve the problems but would not introduce waffle).

2455:

has long been a revolving door of editor-related and/or process-related issues. And I think a large part of it is merely due to the conflict between trying to feature current events on the main page, and

1446:? I don't think we have any the evidence that "average readers" are interested in any statistics at all, and what we can reasonably predict about editors is that some will appreciate it and others won't. 3486:

Based on the results of this planned RFC, a different option for a new name may have fallen out from that. It goes back to raised concerns about workshopping an option first, and makes this premature.

2950:

Yes, but it's confusing as we don't precisify the way we direct readers to articles. "In the news" sounds simpler and clearer to my ear, and we really don't need to include "articles" in the name.--

4576:

is an outlier, where only two pages out of ten have the name of the business or type of place in their title, even when reliable sources may commonly refer to the attacks as such, seemingly due to

1189:

for all of 2023 for a random set of 10,000 articles. 90% of articles get less than 10 page views per day. 70% get less than 1 page view per day. Almost 40% of them get less than 1 page view per

5085:

A lot of these are just random crime news that don't need their own articles to begin with. Except for the ones that saw major coverage after being resolved, I'd say merge them all into a list.

3080:. With all due respect, nominator, to put it simply, I just don't believe a name change would actually do anything to improve decorum at ITN. Its issues are much deeper than a branding problem. 3098:

nominated, and frequently opposed when they are, but sports get reasonably consistent coverage. Personally, I'd favour evolving some standards for a wider range of cultural stories to carry.)

1602:

I think this should be done, and after people see that the sky will not fall by giving editors this info, then it should be turned on by default for both logged-in users, and all readers. --

930: 632:

For me, the length of the Tools menu makes it harder to find specific items that I'm looking for. Thus I prefer that the page view link remain grouped under the page information menu item.

4543: 1623:) to make client-side calls to a volunteer project on every page load is asking a lot, also this gadget causes a screen jump as it waits to load then inserts itself in to the header. — 597: 557: 550: 535: 4539: 3609:

Spending some time workshopping it might have come up with a better alternative title, too. This one is obviously going to fail because the proposed new name is incredibly clunky. --

1789:

This way logged-in editors have access to pageviews without having to open another page first (if they even know about it), and then scroll around, and then click the pageviews link.

4732:

Generally speaking, this should only be done with a consensus on the talk page of the article concerned. Mass renaming without a requested move discussion is likely to be reverted.--

1471:

and fix the problems in that article and not to be scared off by your reminder that the page gets read 1.5 times per minute. Editing articles is an anxious business for some people.

1053:

has been developed over a long time. There is agreement on what is there now. So I think you are in the minority on that. Adding a page views link there justifies hiding or deleting

3776:

But what if the proposals that come out of the WT:ITN discussion are to shift ITN away from "Current events"? Then we'll have wasted community time with an irrelevant name change.

3819:. I originally thought that this was an unconventional attempt at suggesting the re-scoping discussed in the RFCBEFORE, but I'm realizing that a title change that is only said to 4573: 4511: 2933:"The "In the news" (ITN) section on the Main Page serves to direct readers to articles that have been substantially updated to reflect recent or current events of wide interest." 1406:

until a more permanent solution can be found, and will expose it here shortly for discussion. (I've added DNAU so this doesn't get archived in the meantime.) Please stay tuned.

100: 1638:

The screen jump doesn't bother me. Pages have screen jumps for other reasons too. People can turn it off if they don't like it. And it is not much of a screen jump. A line or 2.

4559: 4932:. I wasn't aware WP:CONSISTENT was considered less important than any of the other criteria, and actually I can't find anywhere that says such a thing, perhaps you know where. 560:

a "Page views" link in the tools menu as an alternative of sorts. See the included screenshots. Right now, the link to the page views tool is carefully hidden in: Tools -: -->

4670:(May be excessively long, removal of year or keeping current title may be more appropriate. Name used in current title does reflect the name used in reliable sources better.) 4567: 4547: 3625:

When posting at village pump proposals, please don't forget to notify the main page affected by the proposal. I see this happen here a lot. Anyway, I went ahead and notified

2400:. This closure is not a decision on the original proposal, nor does it preclude another RfC being opened at any time in the future using ideas from the workshopping phase. 4555: 2675:- "workshops" are RfCs too. I welcome discussion on this, whereever the discussion takes us. An RfC can result in more things than merely "support/oppose/no consensus" - 1103:

It is true that the content in the white box isn't at all relevant for experienced editors. I'd be interested to consider a proposal not to display it for those editors.

4563: 2333:

Yes, but, as WhatamIdoing says, there is a bureaucratic procedure that has to be followed on Meta, not the English Knowledge (XXG), to get this proposal off the ground.

539: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 3917:

This is what I was talking about, endless regulars sandbagging everyone with their/our endless badgering. Let a few outsiders weigh in first. Then wait for even more.

2064:, you asked me: "Can you clarify what it is you actually want?" I answered that. I asked you: "whether you oppose or support a page views link in the tools menu." -- 2028:

With all due respect to Timeshifter's volunteer passion about this, as well as his good-faith effort to sum up opinions in the next subsection, I have to agree with

4936:

regarding the El Paso shooting, "Walmart" is part of the common name based on RS, but as I said before it was apparently a consistency issue to propose that rename.

4551: 3969:

Okay. Regarding your comment about ITN regulars badgering/sandbagging, I'm not sure if you're referring to me, but if you are, I'm going to quote myself from above:

1947:

as distinguished to a "nice-to-have, for some people". Personally I think I'd find readily accessible pageviews more demoralising than anything, but if I'm curious

1490: 1183:

I have recently come to the conclusion that promoting page views information to editors is a bad idea. Here's why: the page views for most articles are very low.

1589: 1367:. Many people do not want a separate template. So that leaves few choices if you really want pages views to be more accessible to average readers and editors. -- 204: 965: 1641:

We can start with logged-in users first and see how that goes. If it is too much of a load on the servers, then set it to only update the numbers once a day.

2163:

Supports talk page editors deciding whether to add a pageviews link in comment, banner, or box. Generally opposed to making it more accessible than that:

464: 838:

and the page menu which require enabling gadgets in preferences. And enabling Xtools by default for logged-in users might unduly increase server load. --

219: 4108:

per Thebiguglyalien, Joseph2302, et al. This is a poorly-thought through, hasty, vague proposal that detracts from the constructive work being done at

1300:

what matters to me. If I have a choice between a popular and unpopular page, and both matter to me, then I will probably edit the popular page more. --

1267:. We're all going to die.) We need editors thinking about the work that needs to be done, rather than being focused on the popularity of the page. 71: 4961:

There are very few clear black-and-white rules regarding article titles (or anything else on Knowledge (XXG)). Does common name take priority? Yes,

3140:. I too share concerns about the process, or more specifically how certain regulars do things, but this proposal is half-baked to put it mildly. ~~ 971: 469: 4718:

I know that is typical protocol, but I wanted to discuss it in a singular place first. Multiple discussions over multiple RMs would be confusing.

4815:

for titles, and it's the last one, because it's the least important one. I get nervous whenever anyone endeavors to "make all titles consistent."

1388:. I am a strong supporter of accessibility of page views information on Talk pages, but this is not he way to go. I won't repeat the reasoning I 3270:

shall be promoted to the main page in chaotic order." Plus, regardless of whether this will weed out everything, "Current events" already : -->

422: 427: 43: 4679: 4458: 4427: 4397: 3381: 3209: 3179: 1922:

what will work. For example, I don't want to add any more server load. Adding a link to a submenu of the tools menu adds no server load. --

1692:

wasn't on most talk pages. For those pages, the situation was identical to how it was now, so I don't get why this is such a huge issue. ―

1420:

You haven't stated whether you oppose or support a page views link in the tools menu. Please say so in the previous talk section above. --

182: 57: 4340: 3067: 1264: 4984:

As for consistency being low priority, that's more my opinion, or my analysis of how these things usually go, than a "rule" or policy.

2433: 405: 395: 5039:– I disagree, Levivich! You usually get four answers from three people, unless one of them is socking, in which case you'll get five. 4602: 3837: 3337: 2561: 2538: 2320: 5122: 3583:

float or brainstorm ideas for those who are interested (like the idea lab, or, in this case, WT:ITN). RFC is an "expensive" process.

1663:

Sure it doesn't bother you - and that's why you and others can opt-in to it. A jumpy interface isn't very nice for causal readers. —

1021:

This talk page header already has a lot of clutter. I am against adding anything else to it; if anything, it should be simplified. ―

193: 36: 4611: 2376: 1282:

such an article, and I then take satisfaction in knowing that we had some background on the topic available to the reading public.

911: 379: 272: 4874: 4667: 4826:

and those without. For those with a common name, we use that name, regardless of whether it's consistent with anything else. So,

4624: 542:

on 18 April 2023 due to a security issue. After that, the Annual readership template was changed into just a text with a link to

4310:

notes, this proposal "will not result in any kind of useable consensus," but in workshopping that future proposal, I agree with

2812:- it makes it clear that this is about articles that are involved in current events in some way. So, similar to what we do with 960: 831:

as with the page menu discussed below. That means scrolling would no longer be necessary to see all the links in the tools menu.

166: 4454: 4423: 4393: 3700: 1704: 1336: 1243: 1033: 790: 729: 553:

appears to be that the template should be kept, but noincluded and made invisible, pending a solution for the Graph extension.

444: 367: 5127: 870:

from all talk pages, and use this location instead. This way the number of links to page views on talk pages goes from around

252: 241: 64: 4827: 4615: 4476: 3192:

What the change would do is remove the "it appears in the news so it should be on the Knowledge (XXG) frontpage" denotation.

2100:

questions. I made other suggestions. That's not badgering. What happens next is up to others. I don't edit the tools menu. --

4971:

generally prefers the name that is most commonly used ... as such names will usually best fit the five criteria listed above

3931:"Wait" as in close this RfC now and continue discussing the issue at the BEFORE discussion, or "wait" as in something else? 951: 21: 17: 4580:

within the category. Including the type of place as well as year and location in some article titles will also better suit

3857:. In a few hours since this started, the discussion has become long and confused about what is trying to be achieved here. 3391:

And yet it appears to be broke, or at least making weird beeping noises and vibrating more than the manual says it should.

4921: 4909:, I do note that the page's current name does reflect common name so a rename may not be necessary. The same goes for the 4639: 4355:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

3349:. Superficial changes rarely ever work. It's better to actually focus on what to do to address the underlying problems. – 2243: 1295:"We need editors thinking about the work that needs to be done, rather than being focused on the popularity of the page." 571: 4658: 4211: 3882: 3626: 2397: 4784:

Oh I see, I didn't know that was possible. Still, I'd prefer to discuss it here without any actual actions taken first.

4629: 4223: 4151: 4076: 3984: 3940: 3785: 3751: 3725: 3543: 3513: 2991:

That's an overreduction. ITN is also new and expanded articles. Two of the DYK goals are still about being interesting.

2700: 4654: 4598: 3331:. Just a longer way to say the same thing without addressing the underlying issues or improving the section at all. -- 2868:

Maybe it's more of a British English thing but it means being excessively verbose in a non-meaningful way. Someone who

1186: 4179: 3421: 3012: 2982: 2955: 2918: 2543:

Striking my vote, better to have an early close and to come up with a more fleshed-out proposal. See reasoning in the

1838:

I don't know if you have read the previous talk sections. But the goal is to make the pageviews link more accessible.

4570:(50 out of 51). On average, 79.3% of articles include the place name or type in titles, based on those listed above. 4514:

to bring them in line with pages in other categories pertinent to attacks in indoor places in the United States, per

2813: 2760: 2627: 3823:

is way too vague of a proposed change, and that a much better and more precise proposal should've been workshopped.

3684: 1575:

It names the page creator, and has a link to "full page statistics" that goes here (it is filled in automatically):

4410:

explains how to install your own custom CSS. Switching to a different font should be relatively straight-forward.

2413: 2219: 2129: 1915: 1842: 1719: 1686: 1400: 1079:

It doesn't help anyone else, but if you personally want a more concise talk page header I recommend adding to your

1057: 864: 574:, but it would be nice if the button appears by default, regardless of whether a user is logged in or not. Cheers, 528: 4981:

follow the common name, but it does mean the common name is a very strong factor in this multi-factorial analysis.

2040:

and choose your battles. At best, try again in a year or so, after the situation with the non-working charts bug (

1978:

the means to make a pageviews link more accessible. See my reply to Mathglot a few paragraphs up for more info. --

5101: 4906: 4866: 4663: 3901: 1513: 1393: 1128: 230: 4939:

So, I'm pretty confused. Does common name take priority? I've heard different things from different people now.

4862: 1474:

Putting the page views on all the pages will make editors feel like someone else (i.e., you) has told them that

985: 377: 365: 153: 4846:". So for each one you want to change, you'd have to check whether the current title is the common name or not. 4835: 4620: 4259:

for an early close. I don't want this kept open just so that it can be treated as a chew toy by ITNC regulars.

3377: 3213: 3183: 3053:. This is a CREEPy, bureaucratic cosmetic change that will do nothing to address the asserted issues. Frankly, 1749: 2480: 2429: 1145:

I'm interested in improving the interface for everyone, not just myself. A personal CSS hack doesn't do that.

3799:

a RFC is highly likely to be forthcoming from revamping ITN and a new name might fall out of that naturally.

4831: 4370: 4365: 4322: 4264: 3639: 3522:

I appreciate seeing so many ITN regulars commenting here. It's interesting to see your (plural) comments. -

3103: 2797: 2735: 2324: 1891: 1389: 1283: 581: 4985: 4966: 4929: 4925: 4902: 4823: 4808: 3475:

This is a name change proposal, it in no way hinders whatever 'process proposals' people are working on. -

3369: 860:

I say do both. But if not in the tools menu, let's start here in the talk header template. We could remove

5076: 5052: 4237: 4201: 4187: 4165: 4133: 4060: 4002: 3960: 3922: 3833: 3308: 3128: 3008: 2978: 2951: 2914: 2557: 2534: 2353: 2338: 2310: 2302: 2018: 1521: 1499: 1272: 1221: 4518:. Pages in this category tend to be named after the year and city/town the attacks take place in, (e.g., 3854: 3058: 1259:

careful. The next thing you know, editors are thinking about the fact that almost a million people read

941: 435: 171: 4917: 4843: 4650: 4635: 4607: 4594: 4531: 4527: 4523: 4519: 3739: 3085: 2403: 2261: 2107: 2071: 1985: 1929: 1858: 1807: 1732: 1654: 1609: 1427: 1374: 1307: 1070: 1011: 845: 813: 758: 705: 673: 623: 5067:

Overall, I like the idea of a slightly more informative title. After a while, they all blur together (

4812: 4804: 4577: 4515: 4109: 3850: 2676: 1817:

No opinion yet on whether or not this proposal should be implemented, but could you please explain why

1773:: add Page and User dropdown menus to the toolbar with links to common tasks, analytic tools and logs". 1509: 1316:

I doubt that's why Page views isn't that visible; most likely it just wasn't considered that important.

956: 110: 4996:

does not mean "must be the same." Even "consistent" doesn't mean "the same." WP:CONSISTENT continues,

4880:

I don't see any value in adding the word "supermarket" to a title unless it's needed to disambiguate .

2142:

I now only support making the pageviews link more accessible through the tools menu (if submenus added

1595:

The statistics bar is below both article and talk pages. There are separate stats for the talk page.

768: 5086: 4910: 4673: 3886: 3869: 3863: 3166: 3145: 2577: 2190: 1590:

https://xtools.wmcloud.org/pageinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Kamala%20Harris%202024%20presidential%20campaign

1361: 1047: 884: 684:

A link to page views is also available in the "External tools" bar near the top of the history page.

4858: 4854: 4850: 4467:

What if I don't want a sans serif font? Can I set things up to use a serif font in article text? --

3267: 2672: 2457: 2082: 2033: 1468: 806:

The average Knowledge (XXG) reader is more interested in page views than those arcane statistics. --

4998:

there has been a history of consensus among editors regarding several areas where consistency does

4839: 4142:

Have you looked at the discussion at WT:ITN? It's full of non-ITN regulars, which is a good thing.

4117: 4094: 3767: 3694: 3614: 3573: 3448: 3396: 3373: 3279: 3257: 3243: 3227: 3199: 2998: 2894: 2859: 2843: 2768: 2663: 2617: 2590: 2467:" from the title of the section. It connotatively suggests that these are things one might find in 2251: 1960: 1873: 1829: 1759: 1699: 1552: 1331: 1238: 1200:

BTW, if you'd like to figure out how your favorite page compares, then here are a few key numbers:

1095: 1028: 785: 724: 689: 4849:

For those that don't have a common name, there are four other equally or more important criteria:

3665: 3556:

community. And regardless of how this discussion turns out, I welcome the community's thoughts. -

3504:

RfC to allow the RFCBEFORE discussion to finish but I'm not at my computer. Somebody else should.

3222:

You would get instead "this is a current event so it should be on the Knowledge (XXG) frontpage".

2475:, or even that this is Knowledge (XXG) presenting news items. When, as best as I can tell, that's 2298: 2283: 1579: 1449:

It is very easy to assume "I want this; therefore almost everyone wants this". I'm telling you:

5026: 4892: 4487: 4472: 4440: 4414: 4378: 4335: 4316: 4260: 4052: 4040: 4036: 3630: 3588: 3354: 3099: 3062: 2788: 2726: 2472: 2090: 2049: 1899: 1489:

You should get to pick the articles that you want to work on. I suggest to you that a page like

1411: 1164: 1136: 990: 834:

Also, The tools menu is currently on nearly all pages whether one is logged in or not. That is a

633: 576: 4581: 3716:

Should this RfC be closed early to allow the WT:ITN RFCBEFORE discussion to reach a conclusion?

2037: 1119:, proposal not needed, just a doc update. That box (like most else) is already classed, this as 1486:

to see the numbers (or, for now, a link to the numbers) whenever they venture onto a talk page.

989: 5072: 5048: 5009: 4944: 4789: 4759: 4723: 4690: 4292: 4233: 4197: 4183: 4178:

take kindly to folks who aren't from around here. Most regulars do, too. But once you fit in,

4161: 4129: 3998: 3956: 3918: 3824: 3669: 3332: 3304: 3158: 3124: 2548: 2525: 2349: 2334: 2306: 2287: 2029: 2014: 1538: 1517: 1495: 1268: 1217: 937: 369: 3236:

That hasn't happened with DYK, but the ITN thing has already repetitively happened with ITN.

2010: 4775: 4709: 4491: 4444: 4219: 4147: 4072: 4032: 3980: 3936: 3781: 3747: 3721: 3539: 3509: 3320: 3081: 2696: 2255: 2101: 2065: 2006: 1979: 1970: 1948: 1923: 1852: 1801: 1726: 1648: 1603: 1439: 1421: 1368: 1301: 1064: 1005: 987: 839: 807: 752: 699: 667: 637: 617: 5107: 5080: 5056: 5030: 5008:, which is what you're talking about. The example given in WP:CONSISTENT says just because 4953:

Yeah... welcome to Knowledge (XXG), where if you ask three people, you'll get six answers.

4948: 4896: 4793: 4779: 4763: 4749: 4727: 4713: 4694: 4495: 4480: 4462: 4448: 4431: 4417: 4407: 4401: 4382: 4345: 4326: 4298: 4268: 4241: 4227: 4205: 4191: 4169: 4155: 4137: 4121: 4098: 4080: 4006: 3988: 3964: 3944: 3926: 3907: 3873: 3841: 3811: 3789: 3771: 3755: 3729: 3705: 3680: 3673: 3655: 3644: 3618: 3592: 3577: 3562: 3547: 3528: 3517: 3498: 3481: 3470: 3452: 3429: 3400: 3385: 3358: 3341: 3323: 3311: 3283: 3261: 3247: 3231: 3217: 3203: 3187: 3170: 3149: 3132: 3107: 3089: 3072: 3045: 3016: 3002: 2986: 2971: 2959: 2945: 2928: 2922: 2898: 2880: 2863: 2847: 2822: 2809: 2802: 2772: 2740: 2719: 2710: 2704: 2685: 2667: 2651: 2621: 2605: 2594: 2565: 2505: 2452: 2442: 2422: 2357: 2342: 2328: 2314: 2291: 2265: 2144:

to shorten the menu). The other options were not as good (see reasons in the discussions).

2140:

I learned a lot from this discussion which I wouldn't have learned without the discussion.

2111: 2094: 2075: 2053: 2022: 1989: 1964: 1933: 1903: 1877: 1862: 1848:

has been hidden from view on all pages it is on. So that accessible pageviews link is gone.

1833: 1811: 1736: 1710: 1669: 1658: 1629: 1613: 1525: 1503: 1431: 1415: 1378: 1342: 1311: 1286: 1276: 1249: 1225: 1168: 1153: 1140: 1111: 1098: 1074: 1039: 1015: 849: 817: 796: 762: 735: 709: 693: 677: 641: 627: 587: 4056: 3858: 3807: 3494: 3466: 3162: 3141: 1297:

You, or some committee, shouldn't be determining what is important to editors and readers.

1080: 4819: 4701: 4064: 2816:, shouldn't the name of this project page (and process) match the contents and intent? - 2041: 598:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates for discussion/Log/2024 August 25#Extra link in the tools menu?

3885:, which is going to lead to a more organized RfC for more substantial, focused changes. 567:

Page view statistics. Could we perhaps make the page view link appear more prominently?

511: 382: 370: 4311: 4113: 4090: 4048: 4024: 3761: 3688: 3610: 3569: 3442: 3392: 3273: 3253: 3237: 3223: 3193: 2992: 2890: 2853: 2839: 2764: 2659: 2611: 2584: 1974: 1956: 1952: 1869: 1825: 1694: 1647:

is part of Wikimedia, and so I think its servers can handle it if tweaked as needed. --

1326: 1233: 1092: 1023: 780: 719: 685: 3760:

I'm kinda ambivalent now as there's some support for my proposal of "Current events".

5116: 5022: 4888: 4770:

RM has a procedure in place for multiple pages as well. You should go read up on it.

4468: 4411: 4374: 3584: 3350: 2889:

doesn't mark it as being associated with any particular national variety of English.

2646: 2086: 2061: 2045: 1908: 1895: 1664: 1624: 1464: 1407: 1396:, I will just say that I am coming up with a stopgap, template-based replacement for 1160: 1132: 2886: 1796:

editors are likely to see it as they look at all the menus on pages over time. They

4940: 4785: 4755: 4735: 4719: 4686: 4281: 1444:

average readers and editors are more interested in page views than other statistics

4928:, but two people responded (the only people to respond) objecting on the basis of 4704:, which then tags the pages and adds them to relevant reports that editors watch. 4506:

Mass renaming of articles in Category:Attacks on supermarkets in the United States

381: 5037:

welcome to Knowledge (XXG), where if you ask three people, you'll get six answers

5036: 3534:

BEFORE discussion is finished and ideas are hashed out is a recipe for disaster.

2463:

I think we would go a long way towards fixing this if we simply remove the word "

1463:

rather than being focused on the popularity of the page", even if you think it's

1443: 4771: 4705: 4307: 4215: 4196:

I'd like the record to show nothing happening there for 30 hours and 3 minutes.

4143: 4068: 4028: 3976: 3973:

BEFORE discussion is finished and ideas are hashed out is a recipe for disaster.

3932: 3777: 3743: 3717: 3535: 3505: 3039: 2874: 2692: 1725:

while it had the graph of pageviews. Apparently, that does not matter to you. --

1543: 1467:("an attitude of patronizing superiority or contempt") of me to want editors to 1127:

to your common.css, and that should do it. (If it doesn't, please ping me from

269:

Discussions are automatically archived after remaining inactive for nine days.

4818:

There are basically two categories of titles based on my understanding of how

4644: 3800: 3487: 3459: 3413: 2468: 893: 3441:

I feel like such a big change should've had some sort of workshopping first.

1566:: dynamically show statistics about a page's history under the page heading." 4044: 3881:. There is currently an ongoing RFCBEFORE that others can participate in at 3651: 3558: 3524: 3477: 2967: 2941: 2818: 2715: 2681: 2658:

This is why you should have workshopped this rather before starting an RFC.

2601: 2501: 2438: 1147: 1116: 1105: 4916:

The main reason I even proposed this was because I attempted to rename the

698:

That's a pretty obscure location for the average Knowledge (XXG) reader. --

549:

Annual readership is currently used on 53,510 talk pages. The consensus on

262: 3883:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:In the news#RFCBEFORE: removing significance criteria

393: 4977:

it usually fits the 5 article title criteria the best. That doesn't mean

4020: 2632: 5069:'No Way to Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens 2396:. There is consensus to halt this RfC and continue the conversation in 499: 1951:

is right there. (And, for many, and a slightly different application,

1619:

I don't think this is a good idea, forcing all editors (and even all

1514:

Template talk:Talk header#Put page views link in talk header template

1459: 1260: 606:

are aware that the page views link is on the "page information" page:

4534:) which does not align with how it tends to be in other categories. 4988:

itself is written with some rather weak language and caveats, e.g.

4160:

It has potential. And yes, I see you. You're not from around here.

2691:

NOTBURO to say that an RfC should be a free for all is ridiculous.

2885:

That's exactly how I meant it, possibly it is British English but

1748: 1537: 1482:

should care about page views so much that you are trying to force

3252:

Why would it happen with DYK? What would it look like if it did?

666:

That would leave room for a page views link on the tools menu. --

543: 16:"WP:PROPOSE" redirects here. For proposing article deletion, see 2464: 1955:.)As an aside, this Xtools menu gadget has no effect on mobile. 4873:

concise, and in my view, more natural and recognizable, than "

991: 906: 383: 371: 2709:

A "RFC" = a "request for comment". no more, no less. It is a

1644: 2852:

Waffle‽ I love my yellow syrupy pastry, but what is waffle?

4392:

Wouldnt it be great to look at articles in like comic sans

4276:- In fact I'm not even sure this should be opened back up. 2479:

the primary intention of the section. I think the intro to

2250:

turn on XTools at the bottom of the appearance section of

164:

Check to see whether your proposal is already described at

3319:, as a straight up ITN-abolishionist. This helps nothing. 1320:

to be a variety of opinions on what exactly that order is.

658:

and be put on a page called "Print/export". So that would

181:

proposals. Consider developing earlier-stage proposals at

4544:

Category:Attacks on office buildings in the United States

2228:

Donald Albury - comfortable going to page history for it.

4510:

Hi all. I am proposing the mass renaming of articles in

2232:

I hope I got everybody's views correctly summarized. --

4540:

Category:Attacks on shopping malls in the United States

2599:

Alternate name suggestions are of course welcome : ) -

1770: 1534:

Turn XTools gadget on by default. It has pageviews link

775: 475: 459: 454: 449: 139: 132: 125: 118: 1745:

Turn MoreMenu gadget on by default. Add pageviews link

4913:, hence why I did not propose a rename for that page. 4574:

Category:Attacks on supermarkets in the United States

4512:

Category:Attacks on supermarkets in the United States

1753:

Screenshot of the Analysis menu of the Page dropdown.

1542:

The XTools PageInfo gadget, as seen when viewing the

1091:

this cuts most of it out but leaves the search box. –

4590:(Based on naming conventions from reliable sources) 4560:

Category:Attacks on restaurants in the United States

4422:

Thanks for the tip honestly wasn't aware it existed

3055:

Well, if that's the purpose, then let's call it that

2375:

The following discussion is an archived record of a

1851:

Adding the link to the page menu is one solution. --

1580:

https://xtools.wmcloud.org/pageinfo/en.wikipedia.org

1563: 249:

attention or involvement of the Wikimedia Foundation

4568:

Category:High school shootings in the United States

4548:

Category:Attacks on nightclubs in the United States

3061:In my view, the current proposal is a waste of it. 2385:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1455:

I think it is very bad for Knowledge (XXG)'s future

1453:, and because of the page-view distribution curve, 428:

WMF asking for ideas for annual fundraising banners

4905:, sorry if I didn't make that clear. In regard to 4901:To clarify, my proposed renames are also based on 4556:Category:Attacks on hospitals in the United States 4334:. For the same reasons stated in my oppose !vote. 2319:All I can say is, the more languages the merrier! 1491:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics/Popular pages 156:is used to offer specific changes for discussion. 4564:Category:Attacks on churches in the United States 3208:In that case, rename it to only “Current events” 2434:Knowledge (XXG):Articles featuring current events 2009:, you seem to be suffering from a severe case of 423:Subject-specific notability guideline for species 205:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Criteria for speedy deletion 3007:No, we also post updates to existing articles.-- 1682:To be quite frank, even before it became hidden 1442:, where is the evidence for your assertion that 261:changes which have consensus should be filed at 4552:Category:Attacks on hotels in the United States 2271:Adding Svan and Laz languages spoken in Georgia 1063:. So that means less stuff on the talk page. -- 856:Put page views link in talk header template too 825:now support the tools menu over other locations 517:Same menu, but with an extra "Page views" link. 4371:Module talk:Message box#Please add param class 4360:Reducing strife about Talk page banner clutter 1571:It lists the number of editors, watchers, and 538:. The Graph extension which the template used 434:For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the 4063:. Also noting that I've requested a close at 3970: 2388:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 220:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Proposals 8: 4973:. So common name will usually take priority 4875:2019 Jersey City kosher supermarket shooting 4668:2019 Jersey City kosher supermarket shooting 2199:xaosflux - opposed to making XTools default. 1715:It's important to the many people who liked 829:require moving many of the links to submenus 2436:, and also thereby re-theme the process. - 901:{{NUMBEROF|ARTICLES|en|N}}. That is around 247:Discussions or proposals which warrant the 3367: 1760:Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets 1553:Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets 2238:If you want a pageviews link in your own 413:Review of the RfA discussion-only period 4616:2022 Buffalo Topps supermarket shooting 3853:about the scope of the proposal as per 3552:And I appreciate your comments as well. 2172:Unknown as to tools menu with submenus: 1478:about this factor. In fact, you think 604:Few editors, and fewer average readers, 476: 5013: 5005: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4970: 3820: 3054: 2248:below all article and talk page titles 1942: 1818: 827:to add a pageviews link. But it would 3115:Generally speaking, "current events" 2725:reduces the chance of messy closes. – 2301:, I think you need to start with the 1293:condescending to editors and readers: 7: 5041: 4954: 4680:Eaton Township Weis Markets shooting 3436:Discussion (rename and re-theme ITN) 2610:Like I said, just "Current events". 30: 4754:I know, I just want to discuss it. 4700:This should really be done through 4659:2024 Fordyce grocery store shooting 3366:. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. 1887: 1784:needs to be added to the page menu, 1088:.talkheader-body) { display:none; } 914:for discussing improvements to the 740:So you feel that "page views" is a 4990:To the extent that it is practical 4603:2021 Boulder King Soopers shooting 1821:needs to be added to the page menu 253:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (WMF) 242:Knowledge (XXG):Requested articles 170:. You may also wish to search the 14: 5004:, and the first example given is 4655:2024 Fordyce supermarket shooting 4612:2022 Buffalo supermarket shooting 4599:2021 Boulder supermarket shooting 3821:also thereby re-theme the process 2491:Support (rename and re-theme ITN) 2167:WhatamIdoing (in another thread). 2120:Summary and count. Pageviews link 1800:to click the pageviews link. ---- 1212:100 page views per year: top 40% 1203:100K page views per year: top 1% 936:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 894:around 726,000 article talk pages 746:replace something less important. 490:Page views link in the Tools menu 27:Discussion page for new proposals 22:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion requests 18:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion 5042: 4955: 4822:policy is applied: those with a 4811:, which is just one of the five 4625:2022 Chesapeake Walmart shooting 4351:The discussion above is closed. 4019:Pinging previous participants: @ 3627:Knowledge (XXG) talk:In the news 2779:Oppose (rename and re-theme ITN) 2544: 2541:) 12:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2060:here seems to have petered out. 1209:1K page views per year: top 20% 1206:10K page views per year: top 5% 931:Click here to start a new topic. 510: 498: 4869:" is certainly as precise, and 2872:talks a lot but says little. — 2032:here. I think we are well into 1125:.talkheader-help {display:none} 1123:and all you have to do is add 231:meta:Proposals for new projects 5108:20:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC) 5081:19:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5057:19:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 5031:16:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4949:16:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4897:15:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4828:Columbine High School massacre 4794:16:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4780:15:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4764:14:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4750:14:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4728:14:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4714:14:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4695:14:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4496:18:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 4481:12:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 4463:19:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4449:00:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4432:19:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 4418:23:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4402:23:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4383:20:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 4346:00:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 4327:19:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 4299:14:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 4269:21:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 4242:02:05, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 4228:01:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 4206:01:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 4192:21:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 4170:21:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 4156:21:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 4138:20:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 4122:20:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 4099:20:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 4081:20:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 4007:00:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 3989:21:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3965:20:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3945:20:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3927:19:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3908:18:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3874:16:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3842:16:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3812:15:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3790:15:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3772:15:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3756:15:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3730:15:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3706:17:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 3674:02:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3656:13:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3645:12:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3619:20:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3593:06:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3578:13:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3563:13:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3548:13:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3529:13:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3518:13:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3499:13:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3482:13:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3471:12:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3453:12:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3430:16:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3401:02:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 3386:16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 3359:16:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 3342:05:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 3324:02:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 3312:23:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3284:22:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3262:22:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3248:19:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3232:19:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3218:19:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3204:18:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3188:18:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3171:02:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 3150:20:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3133:17:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3108:16:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3090:15:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3073:15:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3046:13:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3017:16:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3003:15:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2987:15:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2972:13:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2960:13:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2946:13:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2923:13:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2899:13:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2881:13:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2864:13:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2848:13:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2823:13:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2803:12:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2773:19:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2741:14:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2720:13:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2705:13:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2686:13:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2668:13:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2652:13:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2628:Knowledge (XXG):Current events 2622:13:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2606:13:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2595:12:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2566:07:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2506:12:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2443:12:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 2423:03:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2358:22:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 2343:20:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 2329:19:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 2315:00:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 2292:00:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 2266:21:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2159:jacobolus (in another thread). 2112:01:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 2095:22:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2076:22:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2054:21:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2023:08:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1990:02:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1965:01:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1934:02:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1904:01:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1878:01:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1863:01:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1834:23:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1812:22:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1737:09:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1711:09:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1670:14:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1659:08:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1630:07:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1614:07:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1526:04:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1504:04:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1432:22:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1416:23:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1379:21:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1343:02:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1312:00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1287:12:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1277:07:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1263:a year. Someone could die! ( 1250:06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1226:06:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1187:I pulled the page views counts 1169:07:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1154:07:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1141:00:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1112:03:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 850:03:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 570:I know there are scripts like 90: 1: 4922:2019 El Paso Walmart shooting 4640:2019 El Paso Walmart shooting 2244:User:PrimeHunter/Pageviews.js 2036:territory, and it's probably 1099:15:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 1075:09:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 1040:01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 1016:11:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 928:Put new text under old text. 818:09:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 797:01:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 763:10:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 736:03:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 710:09:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 694:21:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 678:11:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 642:21:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 628:19:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 588:18:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 572:User:PrimeHunter/Pageviews.js 5123:Knowledge (XXG) village pump 4630:Collierville Kroger shooting 2483:states this pretty clearly. 2137:working again including me. 1798:don't have to leave the page 1786:or the "analysis" submenu. 4232:And not a moment too soon! 2481:Knowledge (XXG):In the news 2430:Knowledge (XXG):In the news 2428:This proposal is to rename 774:tool, which is also in the 95: 5144: 4969:explains, Knowledge (XXG) 4455:WikipedianAncientHistorian 4424:WikipedianAncientHistorian 4394:WikipedianAncientHistorian 4364:I have made a proposal at 4214:for proposals for an RfC. 2303:m:Language proposal policy 2210:Against any better access: 1645:https://xtools.wmcloud.org 108: 15: 5128:Knowledge (XXG) proposals 4907:2019 Jersey City shooting 4867:2019 Jersey City shooting 4664:2019 Jersey City shooting 3849:needs more discussion on 3685:The Emperor's New Clothes 2935:- As you can see, that's 2516:(involved as ITN regular) 2186:Mathglot - opposes it in 1394:Template talk:Talk header 1129:Template talk:Talk header 1004:for a page views link. -- 966:Be welcoming to newcomers 836:big advantage over Xtools 4836:Pulse nightclub shooting 4807:is an essay, it's about 4621:2022 Chesapeake shooting 4353:Please do not modify it. 3993:OK, that's long enough; 3664:Just delete ITN imo ... 3059:Editor time is valuable. 2382:Please do not modify it. 2252:these gadget preferences 1824:, emphasis in original? 1086:#talkheader tr:has(: --> 916:Village pump (proposals) 418:ArbCom election RFC 2024 201:speedy deletion criteria 85: 4832:1999 Columbine shooting 4366:Module talk:Message box 2927:The very first line of 2887:wikt:waffle#Etymology 2 2808:reflect what's said on 2398:the workshopping thread 2368:Rename and re-theme ITN 2246:. For a pageviews link 1792:Since it would be in a 563:scroll all the way down 561:Page information -: --> 409:is open for discussion. 183:Village pump (idea lab) 4453:oh makes sense thanks 4373:would be appreciated. 4174:And wait, yeah, no, I 3975: 3057:sounds pretty pointy. 2275:Hi dear Wikipedians! 1754: 1547: 961:avoid personal attacks 767:I'm talking about the 742:little more important? 611:Page information : --> 536:nominated for deletion 396:Centralized discussion 4918:2019 El Paso shooting 4844:2016 Orlando shooting 4651:2024 Fordyce shooting 4636:2019 El Paso shooting 4608:2022 Buffalo shooting 4595:2021 Boulder shooting 4532:2021 Boulder shooting 4528:2019 El Paso shooting 4524:2024 Fordyce shooting 4520:2022 Buffalo shooting 3740:cart before the horse 2939:the stated intent. - 2711:consensual discussion 1764:Appearance section: 1752: 1557:Appearance section: 1541: 1002:room on the left side 566:External tools -: --> 544:pageviews.wmcloud.org 406:request for adminship 194:Village pump (policy) 4994:should be consistent 4911:2011 Tucson shooting 4865:. So, for example, " 4674:2011 Tucson shooting 2125:Many people support 1508:We appear to have a 218:may be submitted at 179:concrete, actionable 4840:2016 Pulse shooting 4566:(13 out of 17) and 2512:Conditional support 2377:request for comment 1886:But as I mentioned 1819:The pageviews link 1782:The pageviews link 1000:Note that there is 899:6,884,802 articles. 876:726,000 talk pages. 660:consolidate 3 lines 650:section of the the 556:In the same TfD, I 167:Perennial proposals 4089:per InedibleHulk. 3696:Talk to me, Billy 2394:Procedural closure 1945: 1822: 1755: 1548: 972:dispute resolution 933: 744:So then it should 662:in the tools menu 593:For more info see: 192:changes belong at 5040: 5010:Georgia (country) 4296: 4212:started a section 4061:Kiril Simeonovski 3643: 3428: 3388: 3372:comment added by 3159:lipstick on a pig 3009:Kiril Simeonovski 2979:Kiril Simeonovski 2952:Kiril Simeonovski 2915:Kiril Simeonovski 2801: 2761:WP:Current events 2739: 2517: 2499:- as proposer. - 2421: 2220:annual readership 2215:novov - (against 2130:annual readership 2038:time to let it go 1943: 1916:annual readership 1843:annual readership 1820: 1720:annual readership 1687:Annual readership 1451:I don't want this 1401:annual readership 1058:annual readership 998: 997: 952:Assume good faith 929: 865:annual readership 769:Revision history 585: 529:Annual readership 177:This page is for 158:Before submitting 86:Table of contents 79: 78: 5135: 5104: 5098: 5095: 5092: 5089: 5047: 5046: 5045: 5038: 5035: 4960: 4959: 4958: 4745: 4743: 4742: 4588:Proposed Renames 4562:(17 out of 26), 4550:(14 out of 15), 4542:(16 out of 21), 4319: 4318:BluePenguin18 🐧 4290: 4285: 4180:whole other vibe 3904: 3898: 3895: 3892: 3889: 3830: 3829: 3804: 3764: 3703: 3697: 3691: 3649:Thank you : ) - 3637: 3635: 3491: 3463: 3445: 3424: 3418: 3411: 3276: 3240: 3196: 2995: 2856: 2795: 2793: 2733: 2731: 2650: 2649: 2643: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2626:I would support 2614: 2587: 2582: 2576: 2554: 2553: 2531: 2530: 2515: 2418: 2411: 2410: 2408: 2406:TechnoSquirrel69 2384: 2224: 2218: 2195: 2189: 2134: 2128: 2007:User:Timeshifter 1971:Special:PageInfo 1949:Special:PageInfo 1920: 1914: 1847: 1841: 1794:menu or submenu, 1724: 1718: 1707: 1702: 1691: 1685: 1667: 1627: 1476:they should care 1445: 1405: 1399: 1366: 1360: 1339: 1334: 1265:I'm going to die 1246: 1241: 1152: 1150: 1126: 1122: 1121:.talkheader-help 1110: 1108: 1089: 1062: 1056: 1052: 1046: 1036: 1031: 992: 907: 903:11% of articles. 889: 883: 869: 863: 793: 788: 776:page information 732: 727: 610:Tools menu : --> 586: 579: 533: 527: 514: 502: 480: 478: 408: 384: 372: 142: 135: 128: 121: 91:First discussion 31: 5143: 5142: 5138: 5137: 5136: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5113: 5112: 5102: 5096: 5093: 5090: 5087: 5043: 5002:control titling 4956: 4863:WP:RECOGNIZABLE 4830:is not called " 4740: 4738: 4736: 4558:(6 out of 12), 4546:(9 out of 12), 4508: 4390: 4362: 4357: 4356: 4343: 4317: 4283: 4279: 3902: 3896: 3893: 3890: 3887: 3827: 3825: 3802: 3762: 3714: 3701: 3695: 3689: 3631: 3489: 3461: 3443: 3438: 3427: 3422: 3414: 3340: 3274: 3238: 3194: 3070: 2993: 2854: 2789: 2781: 2727: 2679:, after all. - 2645: 2640: 2637: 2634: 2633: 2631: 2612: 2585: 2580: 2574: 2551: 2549: 2547:section below. 2528: 2526: 2493: 2450: 2425: 2414: 2404: 2401: 2380: 2370: 2273: 2222: 2216: 2193: 2187: 2148:For tools menu: 2132: 2126: 2122: 2004: 1918: 1912: 1845: 1839: 1747: 1722: 1716: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1689: 1683: 1665: 1625: 1536: 1403: 1397: 1364: 1358: 1341: 1337: 1332: 1248: 1244: 1239: 1148: 1146: 1124: 1120: 1106: 1104: 1085: 1060: 1054: 1050: 1044: 1038: 1034: 1029: 994: 993: 988: 978: 977: 947: 887: 881: 867: 861: 858: 795: 791: 786: 734: 730: 725: 575: 531: 525: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 515: 507: 506: 505:The Tools menu. 503: 492: 485: 484: 483: 474: 440: 432: 404: 398: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 380: 374: 373: 368: 361: 360: 359: 152:section of the 146: 145: 138: 131: 124: 117: 113: 105: 28: 25: 12: 11: 5: 5141: 5139: 5131: 5130: 5125: 5115: 5114: 5111: 5110: 5083: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5018: 5006:Disambiguation 4982: 4937: 4933: 4914: 4885: 4881: 4878: 4847: 4816: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4798: 4797: 4796: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4684: 4683: 4677: 4671: 4661: 4648: 4642: 4633: 4627: 4618: 4605: 4554:(7 out of 7), 4507: 4504: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4465: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4389: 4386: 4361: 4358: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4339: 4329: 4301: 4277: 4271: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4194: 4172: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 3910: 3876: 3844: 3814: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3758: 3713: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3702:Transmissions 3676: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3580: 3553: 3501: 3437: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3420: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3374:Babysharkboss2 3361: 3344: 3336: 3326: 3314: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3210:198.17.110.223 3180:198.17.110.223 3173: 3152: 3135: 3110: 3092: 3075: 3066: 3048: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2814:Article titles 2780: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2568: 2508: 2492: 2489: 2449: 2446: 2426: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2371: 2369: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2317: 2272: 2269: 2230: 2229: 2226: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2184: 2181: 2178: 2169: 2168: 2161: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2081:Yes, you did; 2057: 2056: 2003: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1975:Special:Impact 1953:Special:Impact 1938: 1937: 1936: 1884: 1880: 1849: 1776: 1775: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1693: 1680: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1642: 1639: 1633: 1632: 1593: 1592: 1583: 1582: 1569: 1568: 1535: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1487: 1472: 1447: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1289: 1256: 1232: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1204: 1198: 1194: 1184: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1090: 1084: 1077: 1022: 996: 995: 986: 984: 983: 980: 979: 976: 975: 968: 963: 954: 948: 946: 945: 934: 925: 924: 921: 920: 919: 857: 854: 853: 852: 832: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 779: 748: 718: 714: 713: 712: 682: 681: 680: 648:"Print/export" 630: 614: 607: 601: 594: 540:was turned off 516: 509: 508: 504: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 491: 488: 482: 481: 472: 467: 462: 457: 452: 447: 441: 439: 433: 431: 430: 425: 420: 415: 410: 400: 399: 394: 378: 376: 375: 366: 364: 363: 362: 271: 267: 266: 256: 245: 234: 223: 208: 197: 186: 175: 144: 143: 136: 129: 122: 114: 109: 107: 106: 104: 103: 98: 93: 88: 82: 81: 80: 77: 76: 74: 69: 67: 62: 60: 55: 53: 48: 46: 41: 39: 34: 29: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5140: 5129: 5126: 5124: 5121: 5120: 5118: 5109: 5105: 5099: 5084: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5070: 5066: 5058: 5054: 5050: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5028: 5024: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5007: 5003: 5001: 4995: 4991: 4987: 4986:WP:CONSISTENT 4983: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4968: 4967:WP:COMMONNAME 4964: 4952: 4951: 4950: 4946: 4942: 4938: 4934: 4931: 4930:WP:CONSISTENT 4927: 4926:WP:COMMONNAME 4923: 4919: 4915: 4912: 4908: 4904: 4903:WP:COMMONNAME 4900: 4899: 4898: 4894: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4879: 4876: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4860: 4856: 4852: 4848: 4845: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4825: 4824:WP:COMMONNAME 4821: 4817: 4814: 4810: 4809:WP:CONSISTENT 4806: 4803: 4795: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4769: 4765: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4731: 4730: 4729: 4725: 4721: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4711: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4681: 4678: 4675: 4672: 4669: 4665: 4662: 4660: 4656: 4652: 4649: 4646: 4643: 4641: 4637: 4634: 4631: 4628: 4626: 4622: 4619: 4617: 4613: 4609: 4606: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4589: 4585: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4571: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4541: 4535: 4533: 4529: 4525: 4521: 4517: 4513: 4505: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4478: 4477:contributions 4474: 4470: 4469:User:Khajidha 4466: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4446: 4442: 4437: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4416: 4413: 4409: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4387: 4385: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4367: 4359: 4354: 4347: 4342: 4337: 4333: 4330: 4328: 4324: 4320: 4313: 4309: 4305: 4302: 4300: 4297: 4294: 4287: 4286: 4275: 4272: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4261:GenevieveDEon 4258: 4255: 4243: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4225: 4224:contributions 4221: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4153: 4152:contributions 4149: 4145: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4128: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4119: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4078: 4077:contributions 4074: 4070: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4053:Novem Linguae 4050: 4046: 4042: 4041:James Allison 4038: 4037:GenevieveDEon 4034: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3985:contributions 3982: 3978: 3974: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3953: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3942: 3941:contributions 3938: 3934: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3915: 3911: 3909: 3905: 3899: 3884: 3880: 3877: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3866: 3862: 3861: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3845: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3822: 3818: 3815: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3798: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3786:contributions 3783: 3779: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3759: 3757: 3753: 3752:contributions 3749: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3727: 3726:contributions 3723: 3719: 3711: 3707: 3704: 3698: 3692: 3686: 3682: 3677: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3662: 3657: 3654: 3653: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3641: 3636: 3634: 3633:Novem Linguae 3628: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3581: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3561: 3560: 3554: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3545: 3544:contributions 3541: 3537: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3527: 3526: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3515: 3514:contributions 3511: 3507: 3502: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3480: 3479: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3440: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3425: 3419: 3417: 3409: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3389: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3365: 3362: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3345: 3343: 3339: 3338:contributions 3334: 3330: 3327: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3315: 3313: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3269: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3174: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3111: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3100:GenevieveDEon 3096: 3093: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3069: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3049: 3047: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3035: 3032: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2970: 2969: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2944: 2943: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2911: 2908: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2836: 2831: 2828: 2824: 2821: 2820: 2815: 2811: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2799: 2794: 2792: 2791:Novem Linguae 2786: 2783: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2759: 2756: 2742: 2737: 2732: 2730: 2729:Novem Linguae 2723: 2722: 2721: 2718: 2717: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2701:contributions 2698: 2694: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2684: 2683: 2678: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2648: 2644: 2629: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2604: 2603: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2579: 2572: 2569: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2546: 2542: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2522: 2513: 2509: 2507: 2504: 2503: 2498: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2488: 2484: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2461: 2459: 2454: 2447: 2445: 2444: 2441: 2440: 2435: 2431: 2424: 2419: 2417: 2409: 2407: 2399: 2395: 2389: 2386: 2383: 2378: 2373: 2372: 2367: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2280: 2276: 2270: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2258: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2227: 2221: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2204: 2201: 2198: 2192: 2185: 2182: 2179: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2158: 2155: 2153:Manifestation 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2145: 2143: 2138: 2136: 2131: 2119: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2104: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2068: 2063: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2001: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1926: 1917: 1910: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1850: 1844: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1799: 1795: 1790: 1787: 1785: 1780: 1774: 1772: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1763: 1761: 1751: 1744: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1721: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1697: 1688: 1681: 1677: 1671: 1668: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1651: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1600: 1596: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585:For example: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1574: 1567: 1565: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1556: 1554: 1545: 1540: 1533: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1492: 1488: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1465:condescending 1461: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1402: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1371: 1363: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1329: 1322: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1288: 1285: 1284:Donald Albury 1280: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1082: 1078: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1067: 1059: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1026: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1003: 982: 981: 973: 969: 967: 964: 962: 958: 955: 953: 950: 949: 943: 939: 938:Learn to edit 935: 932: 927: 926: 923: 922: 917: 913: 909: 908: 905: 904: 900: 896: 895: 890: 886: 878: 877: 873: 866: 855: 851: 847: 843: 842: 837: 833: 830: 826: 822: 821: 820: 819: 815: 811: 810: 798: 794: 789: 784: 783: 777: 773: 772: 766: 765: 764: 760: 756: 755: 749: 747: 743: 739: 738: 737: 733: 728: 723: 722: 715: 711: 707: 703: 702: 697: 696: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 670: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 631: 629: 625: 621: 620: 615: 613: 608: 605: 602: 600: 599: 595: 592: 591: 590: 589: 583: 578: 577:Manifestation 573: 568: 564: 559: 554: 552: 547: 545: 541: 537: 530: 513: 501: 489: 487: 479: 473: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 442: 437: 429: 426: 424: 421: 419: 416: 414: 411: 407: 402: 401: 397: 392: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 264: 260: 257: 254: 250: 246: 243: 239: 235: 232: 228: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 202: 198: 195: 191: 187: 184: 180: 176: 173: 169: 168: 163: 162: 161: 159: 155: 151: 141: 137: 134: 130: 127: 123: 120: 116: 115: 112: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 83: 75: 73: 72:Miscellaneous 70: 68: 66: 63: 61: 59: 56: 54: 52: 49: 47: 45: 42: 40: 38: 35: 33: 32: 23: 19: 5073:WhatamIdoing 5049:WhatamIdoing 4999: 4978: 4974: 4962: 4870: 4734: 4733: 4685: 4682:(fine as is) 4676:(fine as is) 4647:(fine as is) 4632:(fine as is) 4587: 4586: 4572: 4536: 4509: 4391: 4388:Font options 4363: 4352: 4331: 4303: 4289: 4280: 4278:Duly signed, 4273: 4257:Weak support 4256: 4234:InedibleHulk 4198:InedibleHulk 4184:InedibleHulk 4175: 4162:InedibleHulk 4130:InedibleHulk 4126: 4105: 4086: 3999:InedibleHulk 3994: 3971: 3957:InedibleHulk 3951: 3950: 3919:InedibleHulk 3913: 3912: 3878: 3864: 3859: 3855:WP:RFCBEFORE 3846: 3816: 3796: 3735: 3715: 3650: 3632: 3557: 3523: 3476: 3415: 3407: 3368:— Preceding 3363: 3346: 3333:Patar knight 3328: 3316: 3300: 3175: 3154: 3137: 3125:InedibleHulk 3123:make sense. 3120: 3116: 3112: 3094: 3077: 3050: 3040: 3038: 3033: 2966: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2909: 2875: 2873: 2869: 2834: 2829: 2817: 2790: 2784: 2757: 2728: 2714: 2680: 2600: 2571:Weak support 2570: 2545:#Early close 2520: 2511: 2510: 2500: 2496: 2485: 2476: 2462: 2451: 2437: 2427: 2415: 2405: 2393: 2387: 2381: 2374: 2350:WhatamIdoing 2335:Phil Bridger 2321:87.95.81.141 2307:WhatamIdoing 2281: 2277: 2274: 2256: 2247: 2239: 2235: 2234: 2231: 2209: 2208: 2205:Phil Bridger 2171: 2170: 2162: 2147: 2146: 2141: 2139: 2124: 2123: 2102: 2066: 2058: 2030:Phil Bridger 2015:Phil Bridger 2005: 1980: 1924: 1853: 1802: 1797: 1793: 1791: 1788: 1783: 1781: 1777: 1768: 1758: 1756: 1727: 1695: 1649: 1620: 1604: 1601: 1597: 1594: 1584: 1572: 1570: 1562: 1551: 1549: 1518:WhatamIdoing 1496:WhatamIdoing 1483: 1479: 1475: 1454: 1450: 1422: 1390:already gave 1385: 1369: 1355: 1327: 1302: 1296: 1292: 1291:I find this 1269:WhatamIdoing 1234: 1231:interest. ― 1218:WhatamIdoing 1190: 1065: 1024: 1006: 1001: 999: 915: 910:This is the 902: 898: 892: 880: 879: 875: 871: 859: 840: 835: 828: 824: 808: 805: 781: 770: 753: 745: 741: 720: 700: 668: 664:to one link. 663: 659: 656:consolidated 655: 651: 647: 646:I think the 618: 609: 603: 596: 569: 562: 555: 548: 524:Last month, 523: 486: 391: 268: 258: 248: 238:new articles 237: 226: 215: 212:WikiProjects 211: 200: 189: 178: 165: 157: 154:village pump 149: 147: 50: 4813:WP:CRITERIA 4805:WP:TITLECON 4578:WP:TITLECON 4516:WP:TITLECON 4284:WaltClipper 4033:DarkSide830 3712:Early close 3458:instead. -- 3309:talk to me! 3082:DarkSide830 2677:WP:NOTAVOTE 2578:distinguish 2257:Timeshifter 2191:talk header 2156:Timeshifter 2103:Timeshifter 2067:Timeshifter 1981:Timeshifter 1969:Folly Mox. 1925:Timeshifter 1854:Timeshifter 1803:Timeshifter 1728:Timeshifter 1650:Timeshifter 1605:Timeshifter 1544:Jimmy Wales 1510:WP:TALKFORK 1440:Timeshifter 1423:Timeshifter 1370:Timeshifter 1362:talk header 1303:Timeshifter 1255:frequently. 1066:Timeshifter 1048:talk header 1007:Timeshifter 885:talk header 841:Timeshifter 809:Timeshifter 754:Timeshifter 701:Timeshifter 669:Timeshifter 619:Timeshifter 612:Page views. 263:Phabricator 216:task forces 96:End of page 5117:Categories 4884:locations. 4859:WP:NATURAL 4855:WP:CONCISE 4851:WP:PRECISE 4838:" is not " 4645:Zane Floyd 4210:I've just 4182:; cheers! 4057:Jessintime 3949:How 'bout 3690:RadioKAOS 3268:WP:UNUSUAL 3266:"Anything 3163:Epicgenius 3142:Jessintime 2870:waffles on 2673:WP:NOTBURO 2473:news sites 2469:newspapers 2458:WP:NOTNEWS 2240:tools menu 2034:WP:SATISFY 1573:pageviews. 1469:WP:Be bold 1081:user style 771:statistics 652:tools menu 273:« Archives 251:belong at 240:belong at 229:belong at 203:belong at 5017:business. 5014:(country) 4924:based on 4312:Aaron Liu 4114:Thryduulf 4091:Cremastra 4049:Thryduulf 4025:Cremastra 3763:Aaron Liu 3611:Aquillion 3570:Thryduulf 3444:Aaron Liu 3393:Cremastra 3275:Aaron Liu 3254:Thryduulf 3239:Aaron Liu 3224:Thryduulf 3195:Aaron Liu 2994:Aaron Liu 2913:ITN is.-- 2891:Thryduulf 2855:Aaron Liu 2840:Thryduulf 2765:Cremastra 2660:Thryduulf 2613:Aaron Liu 2586:Aaron Liu 2448:Rationale 2202:Folly Mox 2180:Thryduulf 1957:Folly Mox 1870:Thryduulf 1826:Folly Mox 1093:jacobolus 974:if needed 957:Be polite 912:talk page 686:Thryduulf 654:could be 436:dashboard 236:Proposed 227:new wikis 225:Proposed 210:Proposed 199:Proposed 188:Proposed 150:proposals 111:Shortcuts 51:Proposals 44:Technical 5023:Levivich 5012:has the 4889:Levivich 4834:," and " 4582:WP:NCWWW 4412:RoySmith 4375:Mathglot 4341:contribs 4085:Leaning 3838:contribs 3826:Chaotic 3585:Levivich 3382:contribs 3370:unsigned 3351:Ammarpad 3068:contribs 2562:contribs 2550:Chaotic 2539:contribs 2527:Chaotic 2087:Mathglot 2062:Mathglot 2046:Mathglot 1909:Mathglot 1896:Mathglot 1771:MoreMenu 1679:hundred. 1666:xaosflux 1626:xaosflux 1546:article. 1408:Mathglot 1161:Mathglot 1133:Mathglot 1087:td : --> 942:get help 558:proposed 259:Software 140:WP:PROPS 133:WP:VPPRO 126:WP:VP/PR 101:New post 58:Idea lab 4975:because 4963:usually 4941:Macxcxz 4887:My 2c. 4786:Macxcxz 4756:Macxcxz 4720:Macxcxz 4687:Macxcxz 3666:Banedon 2937:exactly 2830:Oppose' 2758:Support 2521:quality 2497:Support 2299:Mzeka95 2284:Mzeka95 2282:Thanks 2042:T334940 1621:readers 1384:Strong 897:out of 551:the TfD 465:archive 455:history 4992:. And 4979:always 4861:, and 4842:" or " 4772:Gonnym 4706:Gonnym 4488:isaacl 4441:isaacl 4415:(talk) 4408:WP:CSS 4308:voorts 4216:voorts 4144:voorts 4110:WT:ITN 4069:voorts 4029:Czello 3977:voorts 3933:voorts 3860:Joseph 3851:WT:ITN 3778:voorts 3744:voorts 3718:voorts 3681:WP:OWN 3536:voorts 3506:voorts 3408:Oppose 3364:Oppose 3347:Oppose 3329:Oppose 3321:Mach61 3317:Oppose 3301:Oppose 3176:Oppose 3155:Oppose 3138:Oppose 3113:Oppose 3095:Oppose 3078:Oppose 3051:Oppose 3041:Czello 3034:Oppose 2929:WP:ITN 2910:Oppose 2876:Czello 2835:should 2810:WP:ITN 2785:Oppose 2693:voorts 2453:WP:ITN 2177:isaacl 1868:that. 1564:XTools 1460:Cancer 1386:oppose 1261:Cancer 891:is on 872:53,000 634:isaacl 565:-: --> 190:policy 119:WP:VPR 37:Policy 5097:alien 4965:. As 4820:WP:AT 4702:WP:RM 4336:James 4065:WP:CR 3897:alien 3416:Godsy 3271:: --> 3121:might 3063:James 2236:Note: 2225:too). 2135:graph 2083:noted 1888:above 1757:See: 1696:novov 1550:See: 1328:novov 1235:novov 1191:month 1025:novov 970:Seek 918:page. 782:novov 721:novov 477:purge 460:watch 5103:talk 5094:ugly 5077:talk 5053:talk 5027:talk 4945:talk 4893:talk 4871:more 4790:talk 4776:talk 4760:talk 4737:♦Ian 4724:talk 4710:talk 4691:talk 4492:talk 4473:talk 4459:talk 4445:talk 4428:talk 4398:talk 4379:talk 4293:talk 4265:talk 4238:talk 4220:talk 4202:talk 4188:talk 4166:talk 4148:talk 4134:talk 4118:talk 4095:talk 4073:talk 4045:Jc37 4003:talk 3981:talk 3961:talk 3937:talk 3923:talk 3914:Wait 3903:talk 3894:ugly 3870:talk 3865:2302 3834:talk 3828:Enby 3803:asem 3782:talk 3768:talk 3748:talk 3722:talk 3670:talk 3652:jc37 3640:talk 3615:talk 3589:talk 3574:talk 3559:jc37 3540:talk 3525:jc37 3510:talk 3490:asem 3478:jc37 3462:asem 3449:talk 3423:CONT 3397:talk 3378:talk 3355:talk 3280:talk 3258:talk 3244:talk 3228:talk 3214:talk 3200:talk 3184:talk 3167:talk 3161:. – 3146:talk 3129:talk 3104:talk 3086:talk 3013:talk 2999:talk 2983:talk 2968:jc37 2956:talk 2942:jc37 2919:talk 2895:talk 2860:talk 2844:talk 2819:jc37 2798:talk 2769:talk 2736:talk 2716:jc37 2697:talk 2682:jc37 2664:talk 2618:talk 2602:jc37 2591:talk 2558:talk 2552:Enby 2535:talk 2529:Enby 2502:jc37 2465:news 2439:jc37 2416:sigh 2354:talk 2339:talk 2325:talk 2311:talk 2288:talk 2262:talk 2254:. -- 2242:see 2183:Sdkb 2108:talk 2091:talk 2072:talk 2050:talk 2019:talk 2011:IDHT 2002:Stop 1986:talk 1973:and 1961:talk 1944:need 1930:talk 1900:talk 1892:diff 1874:talk 1859:talk 1830:talk 1808:talk 1733:talk 1655:talk 1610:talk 1522:talk 1500:talk 1484:them 1480:they 1428:talk 1412:talk 1375:talk 1308:talk 1273:talk 1222:talk 1165:talk 1149:Sdkb 1137:talk 1117:Sdkb 1107:Sdkb 1071:talk 1012:talk 959:and 846:talk 814:talk 759:talk 706:talk 690:talk 674:talk 638:talk 624:talk 582:talk 534:was 470:talk 450:edit 445:view 148:The 20:and 5091:big 5088:The 5000:not 4920:to 4657:OR 4614:or 4601:OR 4475:) ( 4332:Yes 4306:As 4304:Yes 4274:Yes 4127:Ha! 4106:Yes 4059:, @ 4055:, @ 4051:, @ 4047:, @ 4043:, @ 4039:, @ 4035:, @ 4031:, @ 4027:, @ 4023:, @ 4021:CFA 3995:Yes 3891:big 3888:The 3879:Yes 3847:Yes 3817:Yes 3797:Yes 3736:Yes 3629:. – 3335:- / 3117:are 2477:not 2471:or 2432:to 1512:at 1392:at 1131:.) 1096:(t) 874:to 357:213 353:212 349:211 345:210 341:209 337:208 333:207 329:206 325:205 321:204 317:203 313:202 309:201 305:200 301:199 297:198 293:197 289:196 285:195 281:194 277:193 214:or 172:FAQ 65:WMF 5119:: 5106:) 5079:) 5055:) 5029:) 4947:) 4895:) 4857:, 4853:, 4792:) 4778:) 4762:) 4744:M♦ 4739:Ma 4726:) 4712:) 4693:) 4666:→ 4653:→ 4638:→ 4623:→ 4610:→ 4597:→ 4584:. 4530:, 4526:, 4522:, 4494:) 4479:) 4461:) 4447:) 4430:) 4400:) 4381:) 4344:) 4338:(/ 4325:) 4323:💬 4321:( 4282:⛵ 4267:) 4240:) 4226:) 4204:) 4190:) 4176:do 4168:) 4154:) 4136:) 4120:) 4112:. 4097:) 4087:no 4079:) 4067:. 4005:) 3997:. 3987:) 3963:) 3955:? 3952:No 3943:) 3925:) 3906:) 3872:) 3840:) 3836:· 3810:) 3788:) 3770:) 3754:) 3742:. 3728:) 3672:) 3617:) 3591:) 3576:) 3546:) 3516:) 3497:) 3469:) 3451:) 3412:— 3399:) 3384:) 3380:• 3357:) 3307:| 3305:me 3282:) 3260:) 3246:) 3230:) 3216:) 3202:) 3186:) 3169:) 3148:) 3131:) 3106:) 3088:) 3071:) 3065:(/ 3015:) 3001:) 2985:) 2958:) 2931:: 2921:) 2897:) 2862:) 2846:) 2771:) 2763:. 2703:) 2666:) 2647:💬 2630:. 2620:) 2593:) 2583:. 2581:}} 2575:{{ 2564:) 2560:· 2537:· 2514:– 2460:. 2379:. 2356:) 2341:) 2327:) 2313:) 2305:. 2290:) 2264:) 2223:}} 2217:{{ 2194:}} 2188:{{ 2133:}} 2127:{{ 2110:) 2093:) 2085:. 2074:) 2052:) 2021:) 1988:) 1963:) 1932:) 1919:}} 1913:{{ 1902:) 1876:) 1861:) 1846:}} 1840:{{ 1832:) 1810:) 1735:) 1723:}} 1717:{{ 1706:c) 1701:(t 1690:}} 1684:{{ 1657:) 1612:) 1524:) 1516:. 1502:) 1430:) 1414:) 1404:}} 1398:{{ 1377:) 1365:}} 1359:{{ 1338:c) 1333:(t 1310:) 1275:) 1245:c) 1240:(t 1224:) 1167:) 1139:) 1083:: 1073:) 1061:}} 1055:{{ 1051:}} 1045:{{ 1035:c) 1030:(t 1014:) 940:; 888:}} 882:{{ 868:}} 862:{{ 848:) 823:I 816:) 792:c) 787:(t 761:) 751:-- 731:c) 726:(t 708:) 692:) 676:) 640:) 626:) 616:-- 546:. 532:}} 526:{{ 403:A 355:, 351:, 347:, 343:, 339:, 335:, 331:, 327:, 323:, 319:, 315:, 311:, 307:, 303:, 299:, 295:, 291:, 287:, 283:, 279:, 275:, 160:: 5100:( 5075:( 5051:( 5025:( 4943:( 4891:( 4788:( 4774:( 4758:( 4741:c 4722:( 4708:( 4689:( 4490:( 4471:( 4457:( 4443:( 4426:( 4396:( 4377:( 4295:) 4291:( 4288:- 4263:( 4236:( 4222:/ 4218:( 4200:( 4186:( 4164:( 4150:/ 4146:( 4132:( 4116:( 4093:( 4075:/ 4071:( 4001:( 3983:/ 3979:( 3959:( 3939:/ 3935:( 3921:( 3900:( 3868:( 3832:( 3808:t 3806:( 3801:M 3784:/ 3780:( 3766:( 3750:/ 3746:( 3724:/ 3720:( 3699:/ 3693:/ 3668:( 3642:) 3638:( 3613:( 3587:( 3572:( 3542:/ 3538:( 3512:/ 3508:( 3495:t 3493:( 3488:M 3467:t 3465:( 3460:M 3447:( 3426:) 3395:( 3376:( 3353:( 3278:( 3256:( 3242:( 3226:( 3212:( 3198:( 3182:( 3165:( 3144:( 3127:( 3102:( 3084:( 3011:( 2997:( 2981:( 2954:( 2917:( 2893:( 2858:( 2842:( 2800:) 2796:( 2767:( 2738:) 2734:( 2699:/ 2695:( 2662:( 2641:A 2638:F 2635:C 2616:( 2589:( 2556:( 2533:( 2420:) 2412:( 2402:— 2352:( 2337:( 2323:( 2309:( 2297:@ 2286:( 2260:( 2196:. 2106:( 2089:( 2070:( 2048:( 2017:( 1984:( 1959:( 1928:( 1898:( 1890:( 1872:( 1857:( 1828:( 1806:( 1769:" 1762:. 1731:( 1653:( 1608:( 1561:" 1555:. 1520:( 1498:( 1438:@ 1426:( 1410:( 1373:( 1306:( 1271:( 1220:( 1193:. 1163:( 1135:( 1069:( 1010:( 944:. 844:( 812:( 757:( 704:( 688:( 672:( 636:( 622:( 584:) 580:( 438:. 265:. 255:. 244:. 233:. 222:. 207:. 196:. 185:. 174:. 24:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Village pump (proposals) - Knowledge (XXG)

Index