687:) is a prominent dictionary asserting that a specific phrase was first used in publication in a certain year, while later research found older examples, disproving this assertion (with its implicit negative, that there were no earlier cases). Because most tertiary works take a long time to assemble, or (in more dynamic media) are in a constant state of being incrementally updated, it is fairly likely that some particular pieces of information in such a work have already been surpassed by the newer work of others. Some information in tertiary sources may already be obsolete before they even see publication. Sometimes the very conceptual framework behind such a work becomes obsolete, given the passage of enough time, with enough advancement and reorganization in the field to which it pertains. E.g., a decades-old tertiary list of species within a genus, based on outmoded ideas of classification, cannot be used to contradict or seek undue weight against a widely accepted re-classification arrived at through more modern research. On the other hand, a recent high-quality tertiary source with clear and reliable sources may be of more value than an obsolete secondary one, especially in the sciences, where current understanding can be a fast-moving target.
656:. Unfortunately, a large proportion of tertiary sources are indiscriminate. A guidebook that attempts to describe every restaurant in a city cannot reasonably help establish that a particular restaurant is notable. An index of every paper published about a topic in a given year tells us nothing about the critical reception of any given paper. The more inclusive, comprehensive, even "complete" that a work aims to be, the less useful it is for determining the notability of any subject it mentions. On the up side, the more comprehensive a work is, the more likely Knowledge (XXG) editors are to find reliable details in it about any subject within its purview. Thus, in a selection of tertiary sources for a topic, the source that is most reliable for
672:
available and easily digestible (being somewhat predigested). Sometimes a tertiary source can even be replaced with a primary one; for example, a dog breed's actual breed standard (the primary source) is more reliable for the breed's defined characteristics than a tertiary dog breed encyclopedia, though the latter might be very useful for differences and commonalities between varying standards published by different organizations, and may be a good source of additional details, like demographics and breed history. "Stacking" tertiary source citations after a sufficient secondary one
459:
the work is generally regarded as reliable by others in the field in question (primarily a matter of authorial and publisher reputability). These factors counterbalance each other. For example, while typical mainstream dictionaries do not cite sources for specific entries, how authoritative they are considered can be gleaned from independent reviews of their content and editorial practices. Many tertiary works only cite sources in a general way, e.g. a bibliography. Beware tertiary works that have no indication of their own sources at all.
612:
Anyone could compile a large book of alleged facts, anecdotes, and folklore about any given topic, and probably find a willing publisher, without any fact-checking ever taking place. Note however that not all facts about a controversial subject are themselves controversial; there is no principle that a reliable tertiary source good enough for one article is not good enough for another because of the topic's notoriety, the amount of emotion editors bring to editing it, or the frequency with which our article on it is vandalized.
35:
106:
634:
if the things being compared are subject to real-world contention, or are complex in nature. For example, a comparison between
Christian, Judaic, and Muslim concepts of God is unlikely to produce encyclopedic results if based in whole or part on tertiary sources, which are likely to present a poorly
458:
Reliability of a tertiary source is principally determined by four factors: whether its producers (i.e. writers and/or editors) have subject-matter expertise, whether the underlying original sources of the non-novel material are clear, whether its producers are independent of the subject, and whether
359:
aired on quasi-nonfictional TV networks are actually secondary sources; many are tertiary, and simply summarize various views of and facts about a history or science topic, without the result being novel. Some are even primary, for any exaggeratory conclusions they reach on their own. This has become
265:
of journal articles, legislation, etc., provided by indexing services and specialized search engines (not abstracts written by the article authors themselves). Low-quality sources. May be reliable enough for basics in some cases, depending on reputability of the publisher. The abstract included atop
606:
Any controversial, alleged fact is essentially unsourced if the only citation it has is to a tertiary source of questionable reliability (on the particular point or generally). As with secondary sources, this can happen for any number of reasons, including source obsolescence, lack of subject-matter
404:
Any tertiary source can be a primary source, when we are referring explicitly to the content of the source as such. For example, in a comparison of varying dictionary definitions, each dictionary cited is a primary source for the exact wording of the definitions it provides (e.g. if we want to quote
319:
Material found in university textbooks ranges from secondary to tertiary, even in the same work, but is most often tertiary, especially at lower levels and covering more basic subjects. Textbooks intended for primary and secondary schools are almost always tertiary and, for
Knowledge (XXG) purposes,
660:
purposes has a tendency to be the least valuable for notability and due weight analysis. The inverse is often not true; an exclusively selective, non-comprehensive source may well be unreliable, too, simply because it was poorly researched and reflects a superficial, popular-opinion approach to its
611:
idea as comparable to the generally accepted view, among other problems that can arise with a particular source. A tertiary source that is a compendium of factoids by an author with no known expertise, and which indicates nothing about the sources of its own information, is not a reliable source.
393:
in the more general sense, of a book, film, etc., may be a primary source representing the aesthetic opinions of a reviewer, a secondary analytical piece (rarely, and most often in academic journals), or a tertiary neutral abstract of the reviewed work's content. Many are a mixture of more than one
315:
Sometimes high-quality, generally tertiary individual sources are also primary or secondary sources for some material. Two examples are etymological research that is the original work of a dictionary's staff (primary); and analytical not just regurgitative material in a topical encyclopedia written
548:
Tertiary sources are also commonly used when a secondary source has not yet been found. For example, a field guide about cacti has probably been reasonably well fact-checked, and can be cited as a source for the range of a particular species, if no source focusing on that species (and perhaps with
347:
in an otherwise secondary article. (Some is also primary, such as editorials, op-eds, film reviews, advice columns, and highly subjective investigative journalism pieces.) News reporting is often mostly primary (quoting eyewitness statements, or the observations of an eyewitness reporter, rather
462:
Another factor to consider with tertiary sources is they are often more error-prone than secondary sources, especially the more comprehensive they are. A database of millions of pieces of biographical data, each often taken from a single original primary source and added by a stressed and bored
671:
tell us: "Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made and is the best such source for that context." It is extremely rare for a tertiary source to be the best such source, for anything, in any context; they're simply often the most readily
555:
Older tertiary sources can be used to source former, obsolete views or facts that need to be reported on in a
Knowledge (XXG) article, for completeness, especially when it's difficult to find modern sources that even mention a long-replaced idea, name, person fulfilling a role, or whatever. As
508:
A tertiary source is most often used for reference citations for basic and fairly trivial facts which are not likely to be disputed and which can be verified in other sources. Examples include various vernacular names for a species, the pronunciation of a foreign word, or a baseball player's
527:
Another common use is comparative, especially involving simple facts and basic concepts. An example is citing multiple dictionaries to show how interpretation of a term may vary. (Comparative use of tertiary sources for more complex or contentious material is ill-advised, as detailed below.)
3163:
412:, are tertiary (or even secondary, depending on their content) when written by parties independent of the subject, e.g. the in-depth computer operating system guides found in bookstores (as opposed to the basic one that arrived from the manufacturer in the box with the computer).
114:
Analysis and evaluation require reliable secondary sources, and we cannot cite tertiary sources for them. Tertiary sources differ from secondary ones by not themselves providing significant analysis, commentary, or synthesis. However, some tertiary sources are secondary in some
1203:
325:
682:
An obsolete source cannot be used to "trump" newer reliable sources that present updated information, most especially when the older source states or implies a negative that cannot be proven but can be disproven easily by new data. A pertinent example (detailed
2364:
133:) include any compilation of information, without significant new analysis, commentary, or synthesis, from primary and secondary sources, especially when it does not indicate from which sources specific facts were drawn. The distinction between tertiary and
556:
detailed below, there is a major difference between using a tertiary source to report obsolete facts as such, and trying to use them to preserve obsolete facts as still verifiable (e.g., you can use 19th-century encyclopedias to illustrate how seriously
1768:
1233:
3050:
2499:
323:
Children's books of any kind are tertiary at best, often primary, and are usually unreliable sources. Especially beware citations to books about animals; the majority of them are children's books, so check to be sure. In the same
2930:
2102:
2459:
2268:
1863:
3303:
1570:
3243:
2990:
2611:
1248:
3313:
3055:
915:
3579:
3574:
2865:
762:
3368:
1668:
415:
An abstract prepared by the author of a journal paper is a primary source, like the paper itself. A summary produced by a journal's editors is secondary. A machine-produced digest is not a source at all.
3353:
3103:
1643:
635:
nuanced view of complex theological questions and details of interpretation. Complex comparative work must actually be done in secondary sources cited by
Knowledge (XXG) for those comparisons. The
1698:
1395:
3373:
2780:
1966:
1420:
1343:
925:
1545:
975:
965:
2820:
2800:
1763:
1733:
278:(for most of their content) for Knowledge (XXG)'s purposes including in those disciplines. Not understanding this is a common error by subject-matter experts new to Knowledge (XXG) editing.
204:
run the gamut from books written by experts and published by internationally renowned museums, to books filled with photographs of a particular place or subject, on down to books whose sole
1045:
2057:
1783:
1060:
1000:
1133:
3518:
1465:
2825:
667:
While a good tertiary source can usually be used without incident to source non-controversial facts, such citations can and should be superseded by ones to reliable secondary sources.
463:
data-entry operator, is less likely to have gotten a particular individual's birth date correct than a book (secondary source) written about that person, drawing on multiple sources.
2905:
2860:
2770:
2720:
1986:
1713:
1688:
3627:
3413:
1703:
1338:
1323:
738:
714:
1035:
418:
Primary source material that is simply reprinted (even with some reformatting or digesting) in an otherwise tertiary or secondary source remains primary. This includes quotations.
2740:
1303:
2895:
2810:
1926:
1778:
1683:
1298:
1258:
1113:
3666:
3523:
2616:
2529:
2127:
1868:
1693:
1618:
1328:
1253:
865:
824:
2504:
2449:
2434:
2950:
2900:
2755:
2047:
1385:
1268:
1148:
720:
2187:
1565:
3483:
2112:
1858:
1595:
1520:
1090:
2167:
401:(primary but high-quality source) versus found in a compendium of sports and games (tertiary and low-quality, because likely to be outdated and to be missing details).
3378:
3030:
2875:
2795:
2464:
2213:
2142:
1996:
1293:
474:, which have a paid but indiscriminate array of innumerable writers, and little editorial oversight, though many of them go to some lengths to disguise their nature.
596:
A tertiary source cannot be used, as a matter of policy, as a source for "an analytic or evaluative claim". This is left deliberately broad, so it is not subject to
3423:
2980:
1678:
1555:
1445:
1348:
1333:
726:
1560:
935:
2965:
2935:
2745:
2494:
2489:
2026:
1475:
1430:
1360:
3503:
2182:
3278:
1723:
1098:
812:
3363:
1080:
3233:
3108:
1128:
2995:
2710:
2107:
1793:
1575:
1405:
1318:
920:
405:
them directly), while all of them would be tertiary sources for the meaning and interpretation of the term being defined, in a more usual editorial context.
1853:
1070:
3584:
2885:
2845:
2559:
2172:
2092:
1608:
1510:
1440:
1228:
3473:
3045:
2228:
2725:
2162:
1908:
1400:
940:
2524:
2469:
2439:
910:
3193:
3113:
1976:
708:
668:
467:
428:
130:
51:
750:
3508:
3478:
3268:
3248:
2805:
2474:
2429:
2424:
2233:
2117:
2021:
1758:
1470:
1415:
1370:
1308:
1278:
1183:
1173:
945:
514:
198:, whether general or topical. These are often, but not always, high-quality and reliable sources (compendia are the least likely to be acceptable).
3288:
2790:
1390:
1075:
3443:
3318:
3168:
2890:
2586:
2394:
2273:
2122:
1718:
1540:
1490:
1030:
639:
policy does not permit
Wikipedians themselves to engage in substantive "analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis" of facts or sources.
3458:
3398:
3323:
2815:
2785:
2705:
2534:
1505:
1495:
1460:
1273:
1178:
900:
3498:
3468:
3333:
3308:
3188:
2960:
2419:
2328:
2288:
2192:
1848:
1833:
1708:
1313:
1163:
1118:
1050:
1010:
860:
510:
58:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3610:
3438:
3418:
3343:
3338:
2910:
2399:
2042:
1951:
1813:
1748:
1658:
1648:
1623:
1585:
1580:
1515:
1283:
1243:
1188:
756:
732:
59:
1896:
2514:
2177:
2006:
3632:
3035:
2323:
2308:
2223:
1798:
1143:
890:
885:
3428:
3238:
3208:
3173:
3000:
2479:
2389:
2303:
1946:
1916:
1788:
970:
623:
539:
535:
1065:
3594:
3463:
3293:
3020:
2920:
2730:
2606:
2519:
2484:
2409:
2379:
2243:
2077:
2067:
2016:
1843:
1828:
1753:
1525:
1375:
1218:
1005:
950:
875:
805:
696:
138:
126:
47:
2509:
2404:
2369:
1198:
352:
primary, regardless of what it contains, the closer it is to the date of the events, and the further in time those events recede.
3569:
3383:
3298:
3060:
3005:
2925:
2880:
2835:
2830:
2715:
2549:
2344:
2052:
1873:
1653:
1628:
1535:
1530:
1410:
1040:
955:
870:
645:
343:
that summarize publicly-available information without adding any investigation or analysis; and sidebars of statistics or other
3564:
2760:
2444:
768:
3620:
3393:
3273:
3153:
3128:
2955:
2591:
2554:
2544:
2147:
2087:
1941:
1238:
1213:
1168:
1020:
995:
985:
960:
3513:
3328:
3213:
3138:
3025:
2945:
2915:
2765:
2384:
2354:
2318:
2208:
2072:
1991:
1773:
1638:
1603:
1450:
1208:
1158:
1153:
880:
597:
1936:
1123:
3615:
3203:
3198:
3158:
3143:
3133:
3010:
2855:
2263:
2253:
2152:
1961:
1823:
1108:
980:
744:
221:, especially below the university level in the natural sciences and below the graduate-school level in some other fields.
3661:
3589:
3546:
3358:
3223:
3123:
3083:
3040:
2985:
2975:
2970:
2940:
2775:
2750:
2735:
2690:
2576:
2298:
2238:
1971:
1808:
1743:
1738:
1728:
1480:
1103:
855:
837:
798:
348:
than based on more in-depth material from experts and notable organizations). News reporting is treated more and more
3263:
3218:
2581:
2454:
2414:
2218:
1956:
1485:
930:
521:
statements in an article are sourced, and tertiary sources frequently are used for many non-controversial details.
3493:
3433:
3408:
3348:
3258:
3253:
2840:
2657:
2359:
2349:
2137:
2132:
1550:
1223:
1193:
1025:
702:
657:
631:
3453:
3403:
3183:
3178:
3148:
2637:
2601:
2596:
2293:
2097:
1931:
1455:
1288:
1263:
1138:
653:
619:
779:
397:
Certain kinds of sources that are usually tertiary may in some instances be primary, e.g. rules published by a
232:
3448:
3015:
2870:
2283:
2278:
2062:
1981:
1838:
1500:
336:
905:
191:
3388:
2850:
2647:
2571:
1435:
1380:
1365:
895:
684:
649:
378:, despite aggregating information from multiple previous publications. The less analytic kind of academic
145:
that has been published by a reliable secondary source." Thus, such claims cannot be cited to tertiary or
3488:
3098:
2667:
2642:
2621:
2001:
1633:
1425:
990:
63:
2662:
2652:
2566:
2539:
1803:
1055:
673:
569:
534:
Tertiary sources are often included as supporting (not principal) evidence in considering the relevant
483:
466:
Tertiary online sources that are written in whole or in part by a general-public editing community are
434:
287:
158:
73:
311:
The medium is not the message; source evaluation is an evaluation of content, not publication format.
398:
271:
3118:
2082:
1921:
1818:
1015:
228:
2258:
2248:
2157:
821:
608:
361:
43:
262:
2011:
627:
560:
was once taken, but such sources cannot be used to try to contradict modern scientific works).
211:
17:
383:
367:
201:
3283:
3228:
2374:
2313:
1613:
636:
371:
356:
340:
141:
policy states: "Articles may make an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim
134:
676:; it does not add more verifiability to the claim in the article, but simply adds clutter.
122:
717:(essay; how to identify when a source may be biased due to a connection to its subject)
379:
224:
146:
131:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources § Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources
3655:
3164:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
66:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
471:
266:
a journal article and written by its own authors is a primary, not tertiary source.
183:
328:
are "adult new reader" books, and abridged editions, or any other digest version.
753:(essay; a four-criterion comparison of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources)
375:
252:
557:
409:
332:
248:
195:
187:
127:
Knowledge (XXG):No original research § Primary, secondary and tertiary sources
618:
Comparative use of tertiary sources can be fraught with problems relating to
765:(essay: opinions about word usage do not trump reliable sources on language)
759:(essay; advancing a tertiary source as if it ends all argument is a mistake)
364:
entertainment material about aliens, ghosts, ancient alleged mysteries, etc.
256:
236:
218:
2365:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
240:
790:
344:
244:
214:. These are usually low-quality sources and should usually be avoided.
1769:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
747:(essay; distinctions between terms like "tertiary" and "third party")
390:
3051:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
607:
expertise, conflict of interest, simple error, or presentation of a
408:
Some usually primary types of how-to and advice material, including
270:
Some of the above kinds of tertiary sources are considered forms of
1234:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
3544:
3081:
2688:
1894:
835:
794:
100:
29:
2931:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2103:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1571:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
374:
are secondary sources, especially when they are themselves
2460:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2269:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1864:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1204:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
916:
Editing
Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
763:
WP:You are probably not a lexicologist or a lexicographer
3304:
How many
Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
386:, may be secondary or tertiary depending on its content.
3314:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
584:
577:
491:
449:
442:
360:
increasingly true as documentary channels produce more
302:
295:
166:
88:
81:
2866:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2500:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
2612:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1249:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
661:
topic, as is often the case with coffee table books.
648:
must be considered skeptically when determining both
3056:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
3603:
3557:
2630:
2337:
2201:
2035:
1907:
1667:
1594:
1089:
848:
3575:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3354:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
976:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
1546:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
838:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
1699:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1644:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1396:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
3374:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3104:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2781:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1421:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
926:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
320:reliable only for uncontentious basic material.
125:(for Knowledge (XXG) purposes, as discussed at
2801:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1967:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1734:Counting and sorting are not original research
470:, and are not reliable sources. This includes
3667:Knowledge (XXG) essays about reliable sources
3628:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3244:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
1764:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1046:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
806:
8:
3294:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2058:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1784:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1061:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1036:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
1001:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
739:WP:Frequently misinterpreted sourcing policy
715:WP:Identifying and using independent sources
429:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources
52:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources
2826:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
741:(essay; a bullet list of sourcing mistakes)
259:, and similar works. Quality varies widely.
3554:
3541:
3519:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3091:
3078:
2906:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2861:News coverage does not decrease notability
2771:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2721:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
2698:
2685:
1904:
1891:
1714:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1689:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
845:
832:
813:
799:
791:
3414:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1704:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1324:Identifying and using independent sources
3580:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2741:Big events make key participants notable
2188:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1566:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
1304:Formatting bilateral relations templates
721:WP:Identifying and using primary sources
339:) is actually tertiary, such as topical
137:is important, because Knowledge (XXG)'s
60:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
2991:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2896:Notability is not a level playing field
2811:How the presumption of notability works
1927:Contributing to complicated discussions
1779:How the presumption of notability works
1299:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1114:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
316:by a subject-matter expert (secondary).
3524:You should not write meaningless lists
2821:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2128:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1869:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1694:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1259:Don't hope the house will build itself
866:All Five Pillars are equally important
509:statistics in a particular year. The
2951:One sentence does not an article make
2901:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2617:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2530:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2048:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1987:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1619:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1561:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1386:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1149:An unfinished house is a real problem
1134:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
936:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
727:WP:Identifying and using style guides
616:Complex or controversial comparisons:
549:more recent data) has turned up yet.
7:
3504:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3484:Things that should not be surprising
3179:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2505:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2450:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2435:Don't call people by their real name
2183:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
2113:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1521:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
48:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
3379:No one cares about your garage band
3364:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
3031:What is and is not routine coverage
2876:No one cares about your garage band
2796:Existence does not prove notability
2214:Assume the assumption of good faith
2143:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1997:Relationships with academic editors
1859:Why was the page I created deleted?
1854:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
1294:Featured articles may have problems
1081:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
783:
772:
331:Some material published in general
3424:Please do not murder the newcomers
2981:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2465:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
1679:Adjectives in your recommendations
1556:What an article should not include
1446:The problem with elegant variation
1254:Don't get hung up on minor details
1071:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
478:Appropriate and inappropriate uses
64:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
3474:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
3046:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
2746:Businesses with a single location
2027:You have a right to remain silent
1476:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1431:Potential, not just current state
1361:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
553:Older but still relevant details:
2495:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2490:Don't ignore community consensus
1724:Confusing arguments mean nothing
538:of conflicting views, to ensure
104:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
2996:Sources must be out-of-universe
2711:All high schools can be notable
2108:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1794:Identifying blatant advertising
1576:The world will not end tomorrow
1406:Not everything needs a template
1319:How to write a featured article
921:Editors will sometimes be wrong
769:Template:Tertiary source inline
709:WP:Identifying reliable sources
669:WP:Identifying reliable sources
18:Knowledge (XXG):DONTUSETERTIARY
3585:Avoid writing redundant essays
3234:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3109:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2936:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2886:Notability cannot be purchased
2846:Masking the lack of notability
1609:Copyediting reception sections
1511:Temporary versions of articles
1441:Principle of Some Astonishment
1229:Creating controversial content
1129:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
1076:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
515:WP:Featured article candidates
1:
3611:About policies and guidelines
2726:Articles with a single source
2350:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
2173:Two wrongs don't make a right
2163:The rules of polite discourse
2093:It's not the end of the world
1401:Not everything needs a navbox
1269:Don't "teach the controversy"
941:Here to build an encyclopedia
517:processes tend to check that
3499:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
3194:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3114:Alternatives to edit warring
1977:Maintaining a friendly space
3479:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3269:Editing under the influence
2806:Google searches and numbers
2525:Don't template the regulars
2440:Don't call the kettle black
2234:Be excellent to one another
2118:Revert notification opt-out
2022:We are all Wikipedians here
1471:Put a little effort into it
1416:Obtain peer review comments
1371:Introduction to structurism
1309:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1279:Editors are not mindreaders
1184:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1174:Beef up that first revision
946:Leave it to the experienced
911:Don't search for objections
511:WP:Good article nominations
333:news and journalism sources
3683:
3509:Why not create an account?
3444:Requirements for adminship
3319:How to vandalize correctly
3289:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3249:Don't delete the main page
3169:Avoid using preview button
2891:Notability comparison test
2475:Don't fight fire with fire
2470:Don't eat the troll's food
2430:Don't call a spade a spade
2425:Don't bludgeon the process
2274:Encourage full discussions
2123:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1759:Don't attack the nominator
1719:But there must be sources!
1541:Try not to leave it a stub
1491:Source your plot summaries
757:WP:Tertiary-source fallacy
751:WP:Sources – SWOT analysis
733:WP:Dictionaries as sources
567:
481:
432:
426:
285:
156:
71:
3553:
3540:
3459:Sarcasm is really helpful
3399:Notability is not eternal
3324:How to win a citation war
3094:
3090:
3077:
2786:Every snowflake is unique
2706:Advanced source searching
2701:
2697:
2684:
2587:No, you can't have a pony
2535:Do not insult the vandals
2395:Don't be high-maintenance
1952:Encouraging the newcomers
1903:
1890:
1496:Specialized-style fallacy
1461:Pruning article revisions
1289:Endorsements (commercial)
1274:Editing on mobile devices
1179:Blind men and an elephant
1154:Articles have a half-life
901:Dissent is not disloyalty
871:Avoid vague introductions
844:
831:
665:Better sources available:
624:non-neutral point of view
536:prominence and due weight
274:in some disciplines, but
192:encyclopedic dictionaries
3469:The Night Before Wikimas
3334:Ignore every single rule
3309:How to get away with UPE
3189:Before they were notable
2961:Overreliance upon Google
2756:Common sourcing mistakes
2329:Settle the process first
2289:Imagine others complexly
2193:Writing for the opponent
2168:There is no common sense
1849:Unopposed AFD discussion
1834:Relisting can be abusive
1709:Avoid repeated arguments
1314:Give an article a chance
1164:Avoid mission statements
1124:Advanced text formatting
1119:Advanced article editing
1066:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
1051:The rules are principles
1011:Product, process, policy
861:Articles must be written
780:Template:Tertiary source
594:Analysis and evaluation:
175:There are many types of
112:This page in a nutshell:
3604:Policies and guidelines
3439:Requests for medication
3419:Please bite the newbies
3344:Mess with the templates
2911:Notability means impact
2445:Don't call things cruft
2420:Don't be the Fun Police
2229:Avoid the word "vandal"
2178:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
2043:A thank you never hurts
1814:Liar liar pants on fire
1749:Deletion is not cleanup
1659:Writing better articles
1649:Write the article first
1624:Gender-neutral language
1596:Writing article content
1586:Writing better articles
1581:Write the article first
1516:Tertiary-source fallacy
1284:Encourage the newcomers
1244:Dictionaries as sources
1189:Build content to endure
697:WP:No original research
604:Controversial material:
501:Usually acceptable uses
423:Determining reliability
410:user guides and manuals
208:is making people laugh.
3662:Knowledge (XXG) essays
3633:Policy writing is hard
3339:Is that even an essay?
3036:What notability is not
2791:Existence ≠Notability
2400:Don't be inconsiderate
2324:Read before commenting
2309:Mind your own business
2224:Avoid personal remarks
1799:Identifying test edits
1144:A navbox on every page
1099:100K featured articles
896:Concede lost arguments
891:Competence is required
822:Knowledge (XXG) essays
646:Indiscriminate sources
468:user-generated content
399:sport's governing body
326:class of suspect works
3429:Pledge of Tranquility
3174:Avoid using wikilinks
3001:Subjective importance
2515:Don't spite your face
2304:Keep it down to earth
2068:Beware of the tigers!
2007:Too long; didn't read
1947:Edit at your own pace
1917:Accepting other users
1684:AfD is not a war zone
1031:There is no seniority
971:Neutrality of sources
643:Over-inclusive works:
532:Establishing balance:
62:, as it has not been
3595:Quote your own essay
3464:Sausages for tasting
3239:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3209:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3021:Vanispamcruftisement
2921:Notability sub-pages
2731:Avoid template creep
2691:Essays on notability
2607:There are no oracles
2390:Don't be a WikiBigot
2244:Call a spade a spade
2017:Unblock perspectives
1844:The Heymann Standard
1829:Overzealous deletion
1789:I just don't like it
1526:There is no deadline
1391:"Murder of" articles
1219:Common-style fallacy
1091:Article construction
1006:Process is important
951:Levels of competence
876:Be a reliable source
630:, and lack of basic
546:Better than nothing:
272:secondary literature
139:no original research
121:Generally speaking,
3384:No one really cares
3299:Go ahead, vandalize
3061:Two prongs of merit
3006:Third-party sources
2926:Notabilitymandering
2881:No one really cares
2836:Inherent notability
2831:Independent sources
2716:Alternative outlets
2550:Nationalist editing
2520:Don't take the bait
2485:Don't help too much
2410:Don't be prejudiced
2380:Don't be an ostrich
2345:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2078:Deletion as revenge
2053:Advice for hotheads
1874:No Encyclopedic Use
1754:Does deletion help?
1654:Writing about women
1536:The deadline is now
1531:There is a deadline
1411:Nothing is in stone
1041:Tendentious editing
956:Levels of consensus
745:WP:Party and person
598:technicality gaming
525:Simple comparisons:
355:Similarly, not all
3394:No sorcery threats
3274:Embrace Stop Signs
3154:Assume good wraith
3129:Anti-Wikipedianism
2966:Perennial websites
2956:Other stuff exists
2592:Passive aggression
2555:No angry mastodons
2545:Hate is disruptive
2405:Don't be obnoxious
2370:Don't be a fanatic
2148:Most ideas are bad
2088:Forgive and forget
1897:Essays on civility
1506:Run an edit-a-thon
1239:Deprecated sources
1214:Citation underkill
1199:Chesterton's fence
1169:Be neutral in form
1021:Reasonability rule
986:Oversimplification
961:Most ideas are bad
680:Outdated material:
578:WP:DONTUSETERTIARY
368:Systematic reviews
202:Coffee table books
179:tertiary sources:
3649:
3648:
3645:
3644:
3641:
3640:
3536:
3535:
3532:
3531:
3514:Yes legal threats
3329:Ignore all essays
3214:Complete bollocks
3139:Asshole John rule
3073:
3072:
3069:
3068:
3026:What BLP1E is not
2946:One hundred words
2916:Notability points
2680:
2679:
2676:
2675:
2480:Don't give a fuck
2355:Civil POV pushing
2319:Mutual withdrawal
2209:Assume good faith
2073:Civility warnings
1992:Please say please
1942:Editors' pronouns
1886:
1885:
1882:
1881:
1774:Follow the leader
1639:Use our own words
1604:Avoid thread mode
1451:Pro and con lists
1209:Citation overkill
1159:Autosizing images
881:Civil POV pushing
384:literature review
372:academic journals
341:overview articles
135:secondary sources
119:
118:
99:
98:
16:(Redirected from
3674:
3590:Finding an essay
3555:
3542:
3204:Butterfly effect
3199:Boston Tea Party
3159:Assume stupidity
3144:Assume bad faith
3134:Articlecountitis
3092:
3079:
3011:Trivial mentions
2856:Minimum coverage
2699:
2686:
2385:Don't be ashamed
2264:Discussing cruft
2254:Deny recognition
2153:Nothing is clear
1962:Expect no thanks
1905:
1892:
1824:Nothing is clear
1671:deleting content
1354:Tertiary sources
1109:Acronym overkill
981:The one question
846:
833:
826:
815:
808:
801:
792:
786:
785:...</ref: -->
775:
774:...</ref: -->
703:WP:Verifiability
658:WP:Verifiability
587:
580:
564:Problematic uses
494:
452:
445:
305:
298:
212:"Bathroom books"
169:
123:tertiary sources
108:
107:
101:
91:
84:
37:
36:
30:
21:
3682:
3681:
3677:
3676:
3675:
3673:
3672:
3671:
3652:
3651:
3650:
3637:
3599:
3570:Value of essays
3549:
3528:
3359:Legal vandalism
3224:Counting juntas
3124:Anti-Wikipedian
3086:
3084:Humorous essays
3065:
3041:What to include
2986:Run-of-the-mill
2976:Read the source
2941:Offline sources
2736:Bare notability
2693:
2672:
2626:
2577:No Confederates
2375:Don't be a jerk
2333:
2299:Keep it concise
2239:Beyond civility
2197:
2031:
1972:How to be civil
1937:Don't retaliate
1899:
1878:
1809:Keep it concise
1744:Delete the junk
1739:Delete or merge
1729:Content removal
1663:
1629:Myth vs fiction
1590:
1481:Robotic editing
1344:Science sources
1339:Primary sources
1329:History sources
1104:Abandoned stubs
1085:
856:Article content
840:
827:
819:
693:
628:novel synthesis
591:
590:
583:
576:
572:
566:
540:article balance
503:
498:
497:
490:
486:
480:
456:
455:
448:
441:
437:
431:
425:
337:usually primary
309:
308:
301:
294:
290:
284:
276:remain tertiary
173:
172:
165:
161:
155:
147:primary sources
105:
95:
94:
87:
80:
76:
68:
67:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3680:
3678:
3670:
3669:
3664:
3654:
3653:
3647:
3646:
3643:
3642:
3639:
3638:
3636:
3635:
3630:
3625:
3624:
3623:
3618:
3607:
3605:
3601:
3600:
3598:
3597:
3592:
3587:
3582:
3577:
3572:
3567:
3561:
3559:
3551:
3550:
3545:
3538:
3537:
3534:
3533:
3530:
3529:
3527:
3526:
3521:
3516:
3511:
3506:
3501:
3496:
3491:
3486:
3481:
3476:
3471:
3466:
3461:
3456:
3451:
3446:
3441:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3266:
3264:Editsummarisis
3261:
3256:
3251:
3246:
3241:
3236:
3231:
3226:
3221:
3219:Counting forks
3216:
3211:
3206:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3095:
3088:
3087:
3082:
3075:
3074:
3071:
3070:
3067:
3066:
3064:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2888:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2868:
2863:
2858:
2853:
2848:
2843:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2778:
2776:Don't cite GNG
2773:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2751:But it's true!
2748:
2743:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2702:
2695:
2694:
2689:
2682:
2681:
2678:
2677:
2674:
2673:
2671:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2648:WikiHarassment
2645:
2640:
2634:
2632:
2628:
2627:
2625:
2624:
2619:
2614:
2609:
2604:
2599:
2594:
2589:
2584:
2582:No queerphobia
2579:
2574:
2569:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2552:
2547:
2542:
2537:
2532:
2527:
2522:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2452:
2447:
2442:
2437:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2341:
2339:
2335:
2334:
2332:
2331:
2326:
2321:
2316:
2311:
2306:
2301:
2296:
2291:
2286:
2281:
2276:
2271:
2266:
2261:
2256:
2251:
2246:
2241:
2236:
2231:
2226:
2221:
2219:Assume no clue
2216:
2211:
2205:
2203:
2199:
2198:
2196:
2195:
2190:
2185:
2180:
2175:
2170:
2165:
2160:
2155:
2150:
2145:
2140:
2135:
2130:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2100:
2095:
2090:
2085:
2080:
2075:
2070:
2065:
2060:
2055:
2050:
2045:
2039:
2037:
2033:
2032:
2030:
2029:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1957:Enjoy yourself
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1924:
1919:
1913:
1911:
1901:
1900:
1895:
1888:
1887:
1884:
1883:
1880:
1879:
1877:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1731:
1726:
1721:
1716:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1686:
1681:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1665:
1664:
1662:
1661:
1656:
1651:
1646:
1641:
1636:
1631:
1626:
1621:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1600:
1598:
1592:
1591:
1589:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1563:
1558:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1486:Sham consensus
1483:
1478:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1095:
1093:
1087:
1086:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
938:
933:
931:Explanationism
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
883:
878:
873:
868:
863:
858:
852:
850:
842:
841:
836:
829:
828:
820:
818:
817:
810:
803:
795:
789:
788:
777:
771:(used outside
766:
760:
754:
748:
742:
736:
730:
724:
718:
712:
706:
700:
692:
689:
674:is not advised
589:
588:
585:WP:TERTIARYNOT
581:
573:
568:
565:
562:
520:
502:
499:
496:
495:
492:WP:USETERTIARY
487:
482:
479:
476:
454:
453:
446:
438:
433:
424:
421:
420:
419:
416:
413:
406:
402:
395:
387:
380:review article
365:
353:
351:
329:
321:
317:
307:
306:
303:WP:ITSTERTIARY
299:
296:WP:NOTTERTIARY
291:
286:
283:
280:
277:
268:
267:
260:
225:Bibliographies
222:
215:
209:
199:
178:
171:
170:
162:
157:
154:
151:
144:
117:
116:
109:
97:
96:
93:
92:
89:WP:USETERTIARY
85:
82:WP:TERTIARYUSE
77:
72:
69:
57:
56:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3679:
3668:
3665:
3663:
3660:
3659:
3657:
3634:
3631:
3629:
3626:
3622:
3619:
3617:
3614:
3613:
3612:
3609:
3608:
3606:
3602:
3596:
3593:
3591:
3588:
3586:
3583:
3581:
3578:
3576:
3573:
3571:
3568:
3566:
3563:
3562:
3560:
3556:
3552:
3548:
3543:
3539:
3525:
3522:
3520:
3517:
3515:
3512:
3510:
3507:
3505:
3502:
3500:
3497:
3495:
3494:Watchlistitis
3492:
3490:
3489:The WikiBible
3487:
3485:
3482:
3480:
3477:
3475:
3472:
3470:
3467:
3465:
3462:
3460:
3457:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3442:
3440:
3437:
3435:
3434:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3409:Play the game
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3349:My local pond
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3259:Edits Per Day
3257:
3255:
3254:Editcountitis
3252:
3250:
3247:
3245:
3242:
3240:
3237:
3235:
3232:
3230:
3227:
3225:
3222:
3220:
3217:
3215:
3212:
3210:
3207:
3205:
3202:
3200:
3197:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3096:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3080:
3076:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2864:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2844:
2842:
2841:Insignificant
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2784:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2774:
2772:
2769:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2703:
2700:
2696:
2692:
2687:
2683:
2669:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2658:WikiLawyering
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2635:
2633:
2631:WikiRelations
2629:
2623:
2620:
2618:
2615:
2613:
2610:
2608:
2605:
2603:
2600:
2598:
2595:
2593:
2590:
2588:
2585:
2583:
2580:
2578:
2575:
2573:
2570:
2568:
2565:
2561:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2553:
2551:
2548:
2546:
2543:
2541:
2538:
2536:
2533:
2531:
2528:
2526:
2523:
2521:
2518:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2486:
2483:
2481:
2478:
2476:
2473:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2455:Don't cry COI
2453:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2443:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2433:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2423:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2415:Don't be rude
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2378:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2366:
2363:
2361:
2360:Cyberbullying
2358:
2356:
2353:
2351:
2348:
2346:
2343:
2342:
2340:
2336:
2330:
2327:
2325:
2322:
2320:
2317:
2315:
2312:
2310:
2307:
2305:
2302:
2300:
2297:
2295:
2292:
2290:
2287:
2285:
2282:
2280:
2277:
2275:
2272:
2270:
2267:
2265:
2262:
2260:
2257:
2255:
2252:
2250:
2247:
2245:
2242:
2240:
2237:
2235:
2232:
2230:
2227:
2225:
2222:
2220:
2217:
2215:
2212:
2210:
2207:
2206:
2204:
2200:
2194:
2191:
2189:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2179:
2176:
2174:
2171:
2169:
2166:
2164:
2161:
2159:
2156:
2154:
2151:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2139:
2138:The last word
2136:
2134:
2133:The grey zone
2131:
2129:
2126:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2111:
2109:
2106:
2104:
2101:
2099:
2096:
2094:
2091:
2089:
2086:
2084:
2081:
2079:
2076:
2074:
2071:
2069:
2066:
2064:
2061:
2059:
2056:
2054:
2051:
2049:
2046:
2044:
2041:
2040:
2038:
2034:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1914:
1912:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1893:
1889:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1685:
1682:
1680:
1677:
1676:
1674:
1672:
1666:
1660:
1657:
1655:
1652:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1642:
1640:
1637:
1635:
1632:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1620:
1617:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1605:
1602:
1601:
1599:
1597:
1593:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1564:
1562:
1559:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1551:Walled garden
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1376:Mine a source
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1224:Concept cloud
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1194:Cherrypicking
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1094:
1092:
1088:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1026:Systemic bias
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
874:
872:
869:
867:
864:
862:
859:
857:
854:
853:
851:
847:
843:
839:
834:
830:
823:
816:
811:
809:
804:
802:
797:
796:
793:
782:(used inside
781:
778:
770:
767:
764:
761:
758:
755:
752:
749:
746:
743:
740:
737:
734:
731:
728:
725:
722:
719:
716:
713:
710:
707:
704:
701:
698:
695:
694:
690:
688:
686:
681:
677:
675:
670:
666:
662:
659:
655:
651:
647:
644:
640:
638:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
610:
605:
601:
599:
595:
586:
582:
579:
575:
574:
571:
563:
561:
559:
554:
550:
547:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
522:
518:
516:
512:
507:
506:Simple facts:
500:
493:
489:
488:
485:
477:
475:
473:
472:content farms
469:
464:
460:
451:
450:WP:TERTIARYRS
447:
444:
443:WP:RSTERTIARY
440:
439:
436:
430:
422:
417:
414:
411:
407:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
381:
377:
376:peer-reviewed
373:
369:
366:
363:
358:
357:documentaries
354:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
322:
318:
314:
313:
312:
304:
300:
297:
293:
292:
289:
281:
279:
275:
273:
264:
261:
258:
254:
250:
249:travel guides
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
213:
210:
207:
206:raison d'ĂŞtre
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
184:Encyclopedias
182:
181:
180:
176:
168:
167:WP:IDTERTIARY
164:
163:
160:
152:
150:
148:
142:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
115:applications.
113:
110:
103:
102:
90:
86:
83:
79:
78:
75:
70:
65:
61:
55:
53:
49:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
3558:About essays
3547:About essays
3454:Rouge editor
3404:Oops Defense
3184:Barnstaritis
3149:Assume faith
2971:Pokémon test
2816:High Schools
2638:WikiBullying
2602:Superhatting
2597:POV railroad
2294:Just drop it
2098:Nobody cares
1932:Divisiveness
1456:Printability
1353:
1349:Style guides
1139:Amnesia test
996:Paraphrasing
784:<ref: -->
773:<ref: -->
679:
678:
664:
663:
642:
641:
620:undue weight
615:
614:
603:
602:
593:
592:
552:
551:
545:
544:
531:
530:
524:
523:
505:
504:
465:
461:
457:
310:
269:
253:field guides
233:concordances
205:
188:dictionaries
174:
120:
111:
41:
3565:Essay guide
3449:Rouge admin
3016:Video links
2871:No big loss
2560:just madmen
2510:Don't shout
2284:How to lose
2279:Get over it
2063:Be the glue
1982:Negotiation
1839:Relist bias
1669:Removing or
1501:Stub Makers
1334:Law sources
1264:Don't panic
711:(guideline)
427:Main page:
335:(which are
153:Identifying
42:This is an
3656:Categories
3621:Guidelines
3389:No, really
3369:LTTAUTMAOK
2851:Make stubs
2572:No racists
2314:Say "MOBY"
2036:Philosophy
1909:The basics
1466:Publicists
1436:Presentism
1381:Merge Test
1366:Inaccuracy
849:Philosophy
654:due weight
650:notability
558:phrenology
282:Exceptions
3099:Adminitis
2668:WikiPeace
2643:WikiCrime
2622:UPPERCASE
2002:Thank you
1634:Proseline
1426:Permastub
991:Paradoxes
906:Don't lie
570:Shortcuts
435:Shortcuts
394:of these.
288:Shortcuts
263:Abstracts
257:timelines
241:databases
219:textbooks
196:compendia
177:typically
74:Shortcuts
3616:Policies
2766:Coatrack
2663:WikiLove
2653:WikiHate
2567:No Nazis
2540:Griefing
1804:Immunity
1056:Trifecta
886:Cohesion
705:(policy)
699:(policy)
691:See also
632:accuracy
484:Shortcut
345:factoids
245:almanacs
237:thesauri
159:Shortcut
3279:Emerson
3119:ANI flu
2083:Failure
1922:Apology
1819:Nothing
1016:Purpose
735:(essay)
729:(essay)
723:(essay)
637:WP:AEIS
229:indexes
217:School
143:only if
2761:Clones
2338:Don'ts
2259:Desist
2249:Candor
2158:Reader
609:fringe
391:review
382:, the
362:fringe
194:, and
129:, and
50:, and
2012:Truce
350:as if
44:essay
3284:Fart
3229:Crap
1614:Coup
966:Need
685:here
652:and
513:and
227:and
2202:Dos
825:(?)
519:all
370:in
46:on
3658::
626:,
622:,
600:.
542:.
389:A
255:,
251:,
247:,
243:,
239:,
235:,
231:,
190:,
186:,
149:.
814:e
807:t
800:v
787:)
776:)
54:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.