Knowledge (XXG)

:No original research - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

674:. They rely on primary sources for their material, making analytic or evaluative claims about them. For example, a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research. Whether a source is primary or secondary depends on context. A book by a military historian about the Second World War might be a secondary source about the war, but where it includes details of the author's own war experiences, it would be a primary source about those experiences. A book review too can be an opinion, summary, or scholarly review. 735:, especially when primary or secondary sources contradict each other. Some tertiary sources are more reliable than others. Within any given tertiary source, some entries may be more reliable than others. Knowledge (XXG) articles may not be used as tertiary sources in other Knowledge (XXG) articles, but are sometimes used as primary sources in articles about Knowledge (XXG) itself (see 1497:; tabulated results of surveys or questionnaires; original philosophical works; religious scripture; medieval and ancient works, even if they cite earlier known or lost writings; tomb plaques and gravestones; and artistic and fictional works such as poems, scripts, screenplays, novels, motion pictures, videos, and television programs. For definitions of primary sources: 1584:; book reviews should be considered as supporting sources in articles about books. Avoid using book reviews as reliable sources for the topics covered in the book. A book review is intended to be an independent review of the book, the author, and related writing issues, not a secondary source for the topics covered within the book. For definitions of book reviews: 47: 509:. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources. All analyses and interpretive or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary or tertiary source and must not be an original analysis of the primary-source material by Knowledge (XXG) editors. 857: 877: 836: 816: 517:, and should be discussed on article talk pages. A source may be considered primary for one statement but secondary for a different one. Even a given source can contain both primary and secondary source material for one particular statement. For the purposes of this policy, primary, secondary and tertiary sources are defined as follows: 110: 320:, determines the type and quality of material acceptable in articles. Because these policies work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another, and editors should familiarize themselves with all three. For questions about whether any particular edit constitutes original research, see the 558:. An account of a traffic incident written by a witness is a primary source of information about the event; similarly, a scientific paper documenting a new experiment conducted by the author is a primary source for the outcome of that experiment. For Knowledge (XXG)'s purposes, breaking news stories are also 1036:
Source information does not need to be in prose form: any form of information, such as maps, charts, graphs, and tables may be used to provide source information. Any straightforward reading of such media is not original research provided that there is consensus among editors that the techniques used
399:
must be supported by a reliable source. Material for which no reliable source can be found is considered original research. The only way you can show that your edit is not original research is to cite a reliable published source that contains the same material. Even with well-sourced material, if you
368:
The best practice is to research the most reliable sources on the topic and summarize what they say in your own words, with each statement in the article being verifiable in a source that makes that statement explicitly. Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its
1591:
Virginia Tech University Libraries provides the following definition: "A book review is an article that is published in a newspaper, magazine, or scholarly work that describes and evaluates a book.... Reviews differ from literary critiques of books. Critiques explore the style and themes used by an
1440:
By "exist", the community means that the reliable source must have been published and still exist—somewhere in the world, in any language, whether or not it is reachable online—even if no source is currently named in the article. Articles that currently name zero references of any type may be fully
289:
exist even for material that is never challenged. For example, the statement "the capital of France is Paris" does not require a source to be cited, nor is it original research, because it's not something you thought up and it is easily verifiable; therefore, no one is likely to object to it and we
1524:
offers this definition: "Primary sources were either created during the time period being studied or were created at a later date by a participant in the events being studied (as in the case of memoirs). They reflect the individual viewpoint of a participant or observer. Primary sources enable the
1488:
Further examples of primary sources include: archeological artifacts; census results; video or transcripts of surveillance, public hearings, etc.; investigative reports; trial/litigation in any country (including material – which relates to either the trial or to any of the parties involved in the
1166:
The prohibition against original research limits the extent to which editors may present their own points of view in articles. By reinforcing the importance of including verifiable research produced by others, this policy promotes the inclusion of multiple points of view. Consequently, this policy
1570:
The Ithaca College Library's page on primary and secondary sources compares research articles to review articles. Be aware that either type of article can be both a primary and secondary source, although research articles tend to be more useful as primary sources and review articles as secondary
849:
Here are two paragraphs showing more complex examples of editorial synthesis. They are based on an actual Knowledge (XXG) article about a dispute between two authors, here called Smith and Jones. This first paragraph is fine because each of the sentences is carefully sourced, using a source that
784:
Do not combine material from multiple sources to state or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. Similarly, do not combine different parts of one source to state or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. If one reliable source says A and another reliable
450:
in the references cited. In general, article statements should not rely on unclear or inconsistent passages or on passing comments. Any passages open to multiple interpretations should be precisely cited or avoided. A summary of extensive discussion should reflect the conclusions of the source.
604:
to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a musician may cite discographies and track listings published by the record label, and an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary
1621:
Jimmy Wales has said of synthesized historical theories: "Some who completely understand why Knowledge (XXG) ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to
553:
are original materials that are close to an event, and are often accounts written by people who are directly involved. They offer an insider's view of an event, a period of history, a work of art, a political decision, and so on. Primary sources may or may not be
895:
The second paragraph is original research because it expresses a Knowledge (XXG) editor's opinion that, given the Harvard manual's definition of plagiarism, Jones did not commit it. Making the second paragraph policy-compliant would require a reliable source
801:
has published the same argument concerning the topic of the article. If a single source says "A" in one context, and "B" in another, without connecting them, and does not provide an argument of "therefore C", then "therefore C" cannot be used in any article.
1167:
reinforces our neutrality policy. In many cases, there are multiple established views of any given topic. In such cases, no single position, no matter how well researched, is authoritative. It is not the responsibility of any individual editor to research
1189:
If your viewpoint is held by an extremely small minority, then—whether it's true or not, whether you can prove it, or not—it doesn't belong in Knowledge (XXG), except perhaps in some ancillary article. Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for original
720:
that summarize, and often quote, primary and secondary sources. Knowledge (XXG) is considered to be a tertiary source. Many introductory undergraduate-level textbooks are regarded as tertiary sources because they sum up multiple secondary sources.
438:
As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Self-published material, whether on paper or online, is generally not regarded as reliable. See
888:
manual, which requires citation of the source actually consulted. The Harvard manual does not call violating this rule "plagiarism". Instead, plagiarism is defined as using a source's information, ideas, words, or structure without citing
588:
of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. While a primary source is generally the best source for its own contents, even over a summary of the primary source elsewhere, do not put
1531:
offers this definition: "A primary source is a first-hand account of an event. Primary sources may include newspaper articles, letters, diaries, interviews, laws, reports of government commissions, and many other types of
1005:
Faithfully translating sourced material into English, or transcribing spoken words from audio or video sources, is not considered original research. For information on how to handle sources that require translation, see
512:
Appropriate sourcing can be a complicated issue, and these are general rules. Deciding whether primary, secondary, or tertiary sources are appropriate in any given instance is a matter of good editorial judgment and
130:. Articles must not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that reaches or implies a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves. Simple calculations are not original research, see 2037: 948:
Because of copyright laws in several countries, there are relatively few images available for use on Knowledge (XXG). Editors are therefore encouraged to upload their own images, releasing them under appropriate
805:
Here are two sentences showing simple examples of improper editorial synthesis. Both halves of the first sentence may be reliably sourced but are combined to imply that the UN has failed to maintain world peace.
1388: 1171:
points of view. But when incorporating research into an article, editors must provide context for this point of view by indicating how prevalent the position is and whether it is held by a majority or minority.
964:
to distort the facts or position illustrated by an image. Manipulated images should be prominently noted as such. Any manipulated image where the encyclopedic value is materially affected should be posted to
1489:
trial – published/authored by any involved party, before, during or after the trial); editorials, op-eds, columns, blogs, and other opinion pieces, including (depending on context) reviews and interviews
864:
Smith stated that Jones committed plagiarism by copying references from another author's book. Jones responded that it is acceptable scholarly practice to use other people's books to find new references.
1148:
be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all challenged or likely to be challenged material and all quotations need a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described at
2284: 1877: 1096:
Mathematical literacy may be necessary to follow a "routine" calculation, particularly for articles on mathematics or in the hard sciences. In some cases, editors may show their work in a footnote.
2199: 1890: 1580:
Book reviews may be found listed under separate sections within a news source or might be embedded within larger news reports. Having multiple coverages in book reviews is considered one of the
1412: 1226: 1398: 1383: 2531: 1458:
in the source so that using this source to support the material is not a violation of this policy against original research. For questions about where and how to place citations, see
227:
Outside Knowledge (XXG), original research is a key part of scholarly work. However, Knowledge (XXG) editors must base their contributions on reliable, published sources, not their
1324: 2030: 2457: 1373: 365:
can be found on a topic, Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to announce such a discovery.
1870: 1329: 480: 369:
meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what the sources express or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material
829:
In this second sentence, the opposite is implied using the same material, illustrating how easily such material can be manipulated when the sources are not adhered to:
671: 1368: 2490: 684:: Knowledge (XXG) articles usually rely on material from reliable secondary sources. Articles may make an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim 843:
The United Nations' stated objective is to maintain international peace and security, and since its creation there have been only 160 wars throughout the world.
210: 2214: 1863: 1561:
defines "secondary source" as "a work that interprets or analyzes an historical event or phenomenon. It is generally at least one step removed from the event".
1220: 34: 1558: 1521: 1509:, such as autobiographies, diaries, e-mail, interviews, letters, minutes, news film footage, official records, photographs, raw research data, and speeches; 2690: 1334: 823:
The United Nations' stated objective is to maintain international peace and security, but since its creation there have been 160 wars throughout the world.
957:, the core reason behind the "No original research" policy. Image captions are subject to this policy no less than statements in the body of the article. 900:. In other words, that precise analysis must have been published by a reliable source concerning the topic before it can be published on Knowledge (XXG). 451:
Drawing conclusions not evident in the reference is original research regardless of the type of source. References must be cited in context and on topic.
2485: 2224: 1966: 1215: 970: 740: 632: 174: 2505: 2291: 2160: 1463: 1303: 611:
analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so.
1099:
Comparisons of statistics present particular difficulties. Editors should not compare statistics from sources that use different methodologies.
2756: 2588: 1682: 785:
source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C not mentioned by either of the sources. This would be improper editorial
731:: Reliable tertiary sources can help provide broad summaries of topics that involve many primary and secondary sources and may help evaluate 2478: 1961: 1417: 224: 184: 2510: 1887: 1363: 55: 1700: 2761: 2500: 2495: 939: 1836: 1829: 1822: 1773: 1661: 1254: 2515: 2452: 1956: 1318: 1183:
If your viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with references to commonly accepted reference texts;
1161: 313: 154: 203: 2229: 2189: 2130: 2047: 1975: 1210: 966: 306: 1754: 1476: 2125: 620:
add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Knowledge (XXG) a primary source of that material.
555: 362: 1643: 2720: 2541: 2219: 2194: 2140: 1718: 1581: 27: 20: 2751: 2583: 2359: 2306: 2279: 2209: 2184: 1339: 775: 1090: 254:. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are 2705: 2155: 2150: 2120: 2025: 1981: 1909: 1609: 1492: 1378: 943: 666:
provides thought and reflection based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains
559: 494: 390: 358: 179: 144: 63: 2667: 898:
specifically commenting on the Smith and Jones dispute and making the same point about the Harvard manual and plagiarism
196: 2473: 2354: 2274: 2057: 2052: 274: 2536: 2442: 2397: 2349: 2344: 2062: 2020: 1986: 1604:
While it is a tertiary source, Knowledge (XXG) is not considered a reliable source for Knowledge (XXG) articles; see
1459: 1205: 779: 169: 1588:
Princeton's Wordnet 2011 defines book review as "a critical review of a book (usually, a recently published book)".
1502: 1242: 2430: 2015: 1946: 1605: 1545: 1358: 1149: 1113: 1089:, such as adding numbers, converting units, or calculating a person's age, is almost always permissible. See also 1082: 1007: 447: 386: 317: 309:. Rewriting source material in your own words while retaining the substance is not considered original research. 278: 247: 164: 123: 1528: 884:
If Jones did not consult the original sources, this would be contrary to the practice recommended in the Harvard
736: 331:
and other pages which evaluate article content and sources, such as deletion discussions or policy noticeboards.
2425: 2145: 2135: 1902: 1344: 541: 950: 2296: 1505:
Libraries define primary sources as providing "an inside view of a particular event". They offer as examples:
1393: 1000: 2662: 1525:
researcher to get as close as possible to what actually happened during an historical event or time period".
2729: 2595: 2234: 2110: 2042: 2010: 1971: 484: 302: 282: 2077: 2600: 2301: 2204: 2115: 2105: 1078: 488: 1186:
If your viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;
328: 281:
says that an inline citation to a reliable source must be provided for all quotations, and for anything
2612: 2607: 2100: 1119: 1046: 1019: 982: 914: 757: 695: 644: 521: 462: 340: 77: 67: 1923: 953:
or other free licenses. Original images created by a Wikipedian are not considered original research,
614:
Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them.
2447: 2437: 1140:
rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is
1081:
among editors that the results of the calculations are correct, and a meaningful reflection of the
1686: 514: 396: 2251: 1278: 961: 590: 432: 119: 1175:
The inclusion of a view that is held by only a tiny minority may constitute original research.
2672: 1704: 357:
Knowledge (XXG) is fundamentally built on research that has been collected and organized from
1736: 321: 1855: 1792: 1086: 662: 498: 265:
The prohibition against original research means that all material added to articles must be
1665: 732: 440: 2652: 712: 596:
A primary source may be used on Knowledge (XXG) only to make straightforward, descriptive
502: 798: 577: 127: 1815: 1758: 549: 506: 370: 581:
may be used in Knowledge (XXG), but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them.
2745: 2321: 1454:
A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if the information is present
1290: 808:
If no reliable source has combined the material in this way, it is original research.
2629: 1647: 312:"No original research" (NOR) is one of three core content policies that, along with 1722: 2657: 290:
know that sources exist for it even if they are not cited. The statement is verifi
239: 223: 2374: 1266: 1176: 1850: 717: 955:
so long as they do not illustrate or introduce unpublished ideas or arguments
250:
exists. This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that
1077:
Routine calculations do not count as original research, provided there is
562:
to be primary sources. Historical documents such as diaries are as well.
1445:
that every bit of material is supported by a published, reliable source.
670:
of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources.
424:
Magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses
1479:
provides typical examples of primary, secondary and tertiary sources.
1606:
WP:Verifiability § Knowledge (XXG) and sources that mirror or use it
1517:, such as buildings, clothing, DNA, furniture, jewelry, and pottery. 404:
supported by the source, you are engaging in original research; see
361:, as described in content policies such as this one. If no reliable 540:"WP:PRIMARY" redirects here. For the article naming guideline, see 1037:
are correctly applied and a meaningful reflection of the sources.
633:
WP:Biographies of living persons § Avoid misuse of primary sources
246:
means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no
222: 870:
This second paragraph demonstrates improper editorial synthesis:
62:
It describes a widely accepted standard that all editors should
1859: 431:
However, note that higher standards than this are required for
1685:. University of California, Berkeley Libraries. Archived from 1223:—discussions of specific article content suspected of being OR 973:
must not present the subject in a false or disparaging light.
940:
WP:Manual of Style/Images § Pertinence and encyclopedic nature
104: 41: 400:
use it out of context, or to state or imply a conclusion not
1851:
YouTube video demonstrating the dangers of original research
1513:, such as art, drama, films, music, novels, and poetry; and 236:
Knowledge (XXG) articles must not contain original research.
2560: 1389:
Using maps and similar sources in Knowledge (XXG) articles
1345:
When to cite § When a source or citation may not be needed
1306:—lists other warning templates related to OR, among others 789:
of published material to imply a new conclusion, which is
672:
Secondary sources are not necessarily independent sources
252:
reaches or implies a conclusion not stated by the sources
19:"WP:NOR" redirects here. For the Norway WikiProject, see 1464:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Lead section § Citations
1127: 1068: 1061: 1054: 1027: 990: 929: 922: 765: 703: 652: 529: 470: 348: 92: 85: 1832:, mailing list, September 26, 2003 (followup to above) 1664:. University of Nevada, Reno Libraries. Archived from 780:
Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources § Text–source integrity
1493:
Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources § News organizations
688:
it has been published by a reliable secondary source.
481:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying and using primary sources
269:
in a reliable, published source, even if not already
2200:
Do not disrupt Knowledge (XXG) to illustrate a point
1757:. Virginia Tech University Libraries. Archived from 405: 301:
Despite the need for reliable sources, you must not
251: 26:"WP:OR" redirects here. For WikiProject Oregon, see 2637: 2625: 2568: 2558: 2524: 2466: 2406: 2382: 2372: 2329: 2319: 2259: 2249: 2169: 2085: 2075: 1995: 1931: 1921: 1260:—to warn of original research in an article section 1646:. University of Maryland Libraries. Archived from 668:analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis 1441:compliant with this policy—so long as there is a 1227:Knowledge (XXG) is not for things made up one day 944:WP:Image use policy § Image titles and file names 716:are publications such as encyclopedias and other 2038:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources 1298:analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic 35:Knowledge (XXG):No original research/Noticeboard 873: 853: 832: 812: 54:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG) 33:For raising issues with specific articles, see 1413:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request 1871: 1272:—inline tag used to warn of original research 741:Category:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) articles 204: 8: 2626: 1610:WP:Reliable sources § User-generated content 1559:University of California, Berkeley Libraries 1522:University of California, Berkeley Libraries 1384:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields 493:Knowledge (XXG) articles should be based on 2532:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 1703:. Duke University Libraries. Archived from 1399:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue 1136:Knowledge (XXG)'s content is determined by 602:verified by any educated person with access 411:In general, the most reliable sources are: 2634: 2565: 2418: 2379: 2326: 2256: 2082: 1928: 1878: 1864: 1856: 1677: 1675: 1321:, an overview of the origin of this policy 1296:—used in talk/noticeboards to remind that 960:It is not acceptable for an editor to use 211: 197: 139: 122:. All material in Knowledge (XXG) must be 66:follow. Changes made to it should reflect 1644:"Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources" 1325:Identifying and using independent sources 131: 1721:. Ithaca College Library. Archived from 1436: 1434: 793:. "A and B, therefore, C" is acceptable 1635: 1430: 572:: Unless restricted by another policy, 455:Primary, secondary and tertiary sources 142: 1374:Identifying and using tertiary sources 1284:—used to warn of unpublished synthesis 1211:Conflict of interest § Citing yourself 1008:WP:Verifiability § Non-English sources 1330:Identifying and using primary sources 1162:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 418:Books published by university presses 283:challenged or likely to be challenged 7: 1683:"Finding Historical Primary Sources" 1544:Any exceptional claim would require 967:Knowledge (XXG):Files for discussion 627:when handling primary sources about 2691:List of all policies and guidelines 1825:, mailing list, September 26, 2003. 1150:WP:Verifiability § Reliable sources 2730:Summaries of values and principles 2571: 2409: 2172: 1998: 1793:": --A Request RE a WIKIArticle--" 1791:Wales, Jimmy (29 September 2003). 1369:Identifying and using style guides 1248:—used to warn of original research 446:Information in an article must be 28:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Oregon 21:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Norway 14: 776:Knowledge (XXG):What SYNTH is not 120:does not publish original thought 2757:Knowledge (XXG) content policies 2640: 2385: 2332: 2262: 2215:Please do not bite the newcomers 2088: 1934: 1839:, mailing list, December 3, 2004 1772:Wales, Jimmy (6 December 2004). 1477:University of Maryland Libraries 1300:claims require secondary sources 1221:No original research noticeboard 1138:previously published information 875: 855: 834: 814: 391:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources 322:No original research noticeboard 258:to the topic of the article and 108: 45: 1719:"Primary and secondary sources" 1335:These are not original research 1319:Core content policies § History 977:Translations and transcriptions 750:Synthesis of published material 575:Primary sources that have been 1818:, mailing list, July 12, 2003. 1460:Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources 327:This policy does not apply to 262:the material being presented. 1: 2762:Knowledge (XXG) verifiability 2225:Responding to threats of harm 1967:Biographies of living persons 1701:"How to Find Primary Sources" 1582:notability criteria for books 1216:No original research examples 1114:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 1091:Category:Conversion templates 904:What is not original research 501:, and to a lesser extent, on 387:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 175:Biographies of living persons 2292:Criteria for speedy deletion 2161:Paid-contribution disclosure 850:refers to the same dispute: 1962:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1662:"What is a Primary Source?" 1490: 1418:The Knowledge (XXG) Library 395:Any material challenged or 185:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 2778: 1503:University of Nevada, Reno 1304:Template messages/Disputes 1159: 1117: 1111: 1044: 1017: 998: 980: 937: 912: 773: 755: 693: 642: 539: 519: 485:Knowledge (XXG):Based upon 478: 460: 421:University-level textbooks 384: 338: 248:reliable, published source 128:reliable, published source 75: 32: 25: 18: 2685: 2421: 1897: 1529:Duke University Libraries 1255:Original research section 951:Creative Commons licenses 489:Knowledge (XXG):Published 2752:Knowledge (XXG) policies 1830:"NPOV and 'new physics'" 1823:"NPOV and 'new physics'" 971:Images of living persons 737:Category:Knowledge (XXG) 307:violate their copyrights 116:This page in a nutshell: 2668:Licensing and copyright 1888:policies and guidelines 1799:. Wikimedia Foundation. 1780:. Wikimedia Foundation. 1743:. Princeton University. 1364:Dictionaries as sources 402:directly and explicitly 397:likely to be challenged 1443:reasonable expectation 892: 867: 846: 826: 441:self-published sources 415:Peer-reviewed journals 232: 132:§ Routine calculations 2663:Friendly space policy 2453:Broad-concept article 1957:Neutral point of view 1797:WikiEN-l Mailing List 1778:WikiEN-l Mailing List 1156:Neutral point of view 479:Further information: 427:Mainstream newspapers 385:Further information: 314:Neutral point of view 226: 155:Neutral point of view 16:Wikimedia policy page 2230:Talk page guidelines 2190:Conflict of interest 2131:Ownership of content 1976:Copyright violations 1952:No original research 1886:Knowledge (XXG) key 1041:Routine calculations 886:Writing with Sources 375:stick to the sources 294:, even if not verifi 279:verifiability policy 160:No original research 2126:No personal attacks 2048:Don't create hoaxes 1837:"Original research" 1774:"Original research" 1668:on 9 February 2007. 1650:on 1 February 2013. 1546:exceptional sources 1515:relics or artifacts 598:statements of facts 578:reputably published 556:independent sources 363:independent sources 349:WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE 2721:List of guidelines 2542:Template namespace 2220:Courtesy vanishing 2195:Disruptive editing 2141:Dispute resolution 1761:on 5 January 2013. 1741:WordNet Search 3.1 1725:on 6 October 2013. 1507:original documents 1312:Supplemental pages 1179:has said of this: 962:photo manipulation 635:, which is policy. 630: 626: 619: 610: 237: 233: 231:original research. 2739: 2738: 2681: 2680: 2621: 2620: 2584:Project namespace 2554: 2553: 2550: 2549: 2491:Dates and numbers 2458:Understandability 2368: 2367: 2315: 2314: 2307:Revision deletion 2280:Proposed deletion 2245: 2244: 2210:Gaming the system 2185:Assume good faith 2071: 2070: 1816:Crackpot articles 1707:on 13 March 2012. 1592:author or genre." 1340:What SYNTH is not 1243:Original research 791:original research 628: 624: 617: 608: 499:secondary sources 244:original research 235: 221: 220: 138: 137: 103: 102: 2769: 2716: 2715: 2706:List of policies 2701: 2700: 2658:List of policies 2645: 2644: 2643: 2635: 2631: 2628: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2566: 2562: 2559:Project content 2419: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2380: 2376: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2327: 2323: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2257: 2253: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2156:Child protection 2151:No legal threats 2121:Ignore all rules 2093: 2092: 2091: 2083: 2079: 2026:Reliable sources 2003: 2002: 2001: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1929: 1925: 1910:Ignore all rules 1892: 1880: 1873: 1866: 1857: 1801: 1800: 1788: 1782: 1781: 1769: 1763: 1762: 1751: 1745: 1744: 1733: 1727: 1726: 1715: 1709: 1708: 1697: 1691: 1690: 1679: 1670: 1669: 1658: 1652: 1651: 1640: 1623: 1619: 1613: 1602: 1596: 1578: 1572: 1568: 1562: 1555: 1549: 1542: 1536: 1496: 1486: 1480: 1473: 1467: 1452: 1446: 1438: 1379:Party and person 1295: 1289: 1283: 1277: 1271: 1265: 1259: 1253: 1247: 1241: 1130: 1103:Related policies 1087:Basic arithmetic 1071: 1064: 1057: 1030: 1014:Acceptable media 993: 991:WP:TRANSCRIPTION 932: 925: 882: 879: 878: 862: 859: 858: 841: 838: 837: 821: 818: 817: 768: 730: 713:Tertiary sources 706: 683: 663:secondary source 655: 593:on its contents. 571: 532: 503:tertiary sources 473: 443:for exceptions. 381:Reliable sources 359:reliable sources 351: 260:directly support 256:directly related 213: 206: 199: 180:Image use policy 147: 145:Content policies 140: 118:Knowledge (XXG) 112: 111: 105: 95: 88: 49: 48: 42: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2735: 2713: 2712: 2698: 2697: 2677: 2641: 2639: 2617: 2572: 2570: 2546: 2520: 2474:Manual of Style 2462: 2410: 2408: 2402: 2386: 2384: 2364: 2360:Page protection 2333: 2331: 2311: 2275:Deletion policy 2263: 2261: 2241: 2173: 2171: 2165: 2089: 2087: 2067: 2058:Patent nonsense 2053:Fringe theories 1999: 1997: 1991: 1935: 1933: 1917: 1893: 1884: 1847: 1842: 1810: 1808:Further reading 1805: 1804: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1753: 1752: 1748: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1689:on 2 July 2012. 1681: 1680: 1673: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1620: 1616: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1579: 1575: 1569: 1565: 1556: 1552: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1487: 1483: 1474: 1470: 1453: 1449: 1439: 1432: 1427: 1422: 1408: 1403: 1354: 1349: 1314: 1309: 1293: 1287: 1281: 1275: 1269: 1263: 1257: 1251: 1245: 1239: 1235: 1202: 1197: 1164: 1158: 1134: 1133: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1110: 1105: 1075: 1074: 1067: 1060: 1053: 1049: 1043: 1034: 1033: 1026: 1022: 1016: 1003: 997: 996: 989: 985: 979: 946: 936: 935: 928: 921: 917: 911: 909:Original images 906: 893: 880: 876: 868: 860: 856: 847: 839: 835: 827: 819: 815: 799:reliable source 782: 772: 771: 764: 760: 752: 724: 710: 709: 702: 698: 677: 659: 658: 651: 647: 565: 550:Primary sources 545: 542:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 536: 535: 528: 524: 507:primary sources 491: 477: 476: 469: 465: 457: 393: 383: 355: 354: 347: 343: 337: 275:inline citation 240:Knowledge (XXG) 217: 143: 109: 99: 98: 91: 84: 80: 72: 71: 46: 38: 31: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2775: 2773: 2765: 2764: 2759: 2754: 2744: 2743: 2737: 2736: 2734: 2733: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2709: 2686: 2683: 2682: 2679: 2678: 2676: 2675: 2673:Privacy policy 2670: 2665: 2660: 2655: 2649: 2647: 2632: 2623: 2622: 2619: 2618: 2616: 2615: 2610: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2580: 2578: 2563: 2556: 2555: 2552: 2551: 2548: 2547: 2545: 2544: 2539: 2537:Categorization 2534: 2528: 2526: 2525:Classification 2522: 2521: 2519: 2518: 2513: 2508: 2503: 2498: 2493: 2488: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2470: 2468: 2464: 2463: 2461: 2460: 2455: 2450: 2445: 2443:Disambiguation 2440: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2422: 2416: 2404: 2403: 2401: 2400: 2398:Editing policy 2394: 2392: 2377: 2370: 2369: 2366: 2365: 2363: 2362: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2345:Administrators 2341: 2339: 2324: 2317: 2316: 2313: 2312: 2310: 2309: 2304: 2299: 2294: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2277: 2271: 2269: 2254: 2247: 2246: 2243: 2242: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2227: 2222: 2217: 2212: 2207: 2202: 2197: 2192: 2187: 2181: 2179: 2167: 2166: 2164: 2163: 2158: 2153: 2148: 2143: 2138: 2133: 2128: 2123: 2118: 2113: 2108: 2103: 2097: 2095: 2080: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2066: 2065: 2063:External links 2060: 2055: 2050: 2045: 2040: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2023: 2021:Citing sources 2018: 2013: 2007: 2005: 1993: 1992: 1990: 1989: 1987:Article titles 1984: 1979: 1969: 1964: 1959: 1954: 1949: 1943: 1941: 1926: 1919: 1918: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1885: 1883: 1882: 1875: 1868: 1860: 1854: 1853: 1846: 1845:External links 1843: 1841: 1840: 1835:Wales, Jimmy. 1833: 1828:Wales, Jimmy. 1826: 1821:Wales, Jimmy. 1819: 1814:Wales, Jimmy. 1811: 1809: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1783: 1764: 1755:"Book Reviews" 1746: 1728: 1710: 1692: 1671: 1653: 1634: 1633: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1614: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1573: 1563: 1550: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1526: 1518: 1511:creative works 1498: 1481: 1468: 1457: 1447: 1444: 1429: 1428: 1426: 1423: 1421: 1420: 1415: 1409: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1355: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1307: 1301: 1285: 1273: 1261: 1249: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1224: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1206:Citing sources 1201: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1184: 1157: 1154: 1132: 1131: 1123: 1118: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1073: 1072: 1065: 1062:WP:CALCULATION 1058: 1050: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1032: 1031: 1023: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1001:WP:Translation 995: 994: 986: 981: 978: 975: 934: 933: 926: 918: 913: 910: 907: 905: 902: 872: 852: 831: 811: 770: 769: 761: 756: 751: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 708: 707: 699: 694: 691: 690: 689: 657: 656: 648: 643: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 621: 615: 612: 606: 594: 586:interpretation 582: 534: 533: 525: 520: 475: 474: 466: 461: 456: 453: 433:medical claims 429: 428: 425: 422: 419: 416: 382: 379: 371:out of context 353: 352: 344: 339: 336: 333: 297: 293: 288: 285:—but a source 272: 268: 261: 257: 230: 219: 218: 216: 215: 208: 201: 193: 190: 189: 188: 187: 182: 177: 172: 170:Article titles 167: 162: 157: 149: 148: 136: 135: 113: 101: 100: 97: 96: 89: 81: 76: 73: 61: 60: 52: 50: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2774: 2763: 2760: 2758: 2755: 2753: 2750: 2749: 2747: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2722: 2717: 2710: 2708: 2707: 2702: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2684: 2674: 2671: 2669: 2666: 2664: 2661: 2659: 2656: 2654: 2651: 2650: 2648: 2646: 2636: 2633: 2624: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2602: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2594: 2590: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2582: 2581: 2579: 2577: 2567: 2564: 2557: 2543: 2540: 2538: 2535: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2527: 2523: 2517: 2514: 2512: 2509: 2507: 2504: 2502: 2499: 2497: 2494: 2492: 2489: 2487: 2486:Accessibility 2484: 2480: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2472: 2471: 2469: 2465: 2459: 2456: 2454: 2451: 2449: 2446: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2432: 2431:Summary style 2429: 2428: 2427: 2424: 2423: 2420: 2417: 2415: 2405: 2399: 2396: 2395: 2393: 2391: 2381: 2378: 2371: 2361: 2358: 2356: 2353: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2340: 2338: 2328: 2325: 2318: 2308: 2305: 2303: 2300: 2298: 2295: 2293: 2290: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2273: 2272: 2270: 2268: 2258: 2255: 2248: 2236: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2221: 2218: 2216: 2213: 2211: 2208: 2206: 2203: 2201: 2198: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2188: 2186: 2183: 2182: 2180: 2178: 2168: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2154: 2152: 2149: 2147: 2144: 2142: 2139: 2137: 2134: 2132: 2129: 2127: 2124: 2122: 2119: 2117: 2114: 2112: 2109: 2107: 2104: 2102: 2099: 2098: 2096: 2094: 2084: 2081: 2074: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2051: 2049: 2046: 2044: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2022: 2019: 2017: 2016:Autobiography 2014: 2012: 2009: 2008: 2006: 2004: 1994: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1980: 1977: 1973: 1970: 1968: 1965: 1963: 1960: 1958: 1955: 1953: 1950: 1948: 1947:Verifiability 1945: 1944: 1942: 1940: 1930: 1927: 1920: 1912: 1911: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1896: 1889: 1881: 1876: 1874: 1869: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1858: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1817: 1813: 1812: 1807: 1798: 1794: 1787: 1784: 1779: 1775: 1768: 1765: 1760: 1756: 1750: 1747: 1742: 1738: 1737:"book review" 1732: 1729: 1724: 1720: 1714: 1711: 1706: 1702: 1696: 1693: 1688: 1684: 1678: 1676: 1672: 1667: 1663: 1657: 1654: 1649: 1645: 1639: 1636: 1629: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1601: 1598: 1590: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1577: 1574: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1541: 1538: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1494: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1472: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1455: 1451: 1448: 1442: 1437: 1435: 1431: 1424: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1406:Research help 1405: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1359:Cherrypicking 1357: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1311: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1292: 1286: 1280: 1274: 1268: 1262: 1256: 1250: 1244: 1238: 1237: 1232: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1207: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1194: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1178: 1173: 1170: 1163: 1155: 1153: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1115: 1108:Verifiability 1107: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1070: 1066: 1063: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1040: 1038: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1013: 1011: 1009: 1002: 992: 988: 987: 984: 976: 974: 972: 968: 963: 958: 956: 952: 945: 941: 931: 927: 924: 920: 919: 916: 908: 903: 901: 899: 891: 890: 887: 871: 866: 865: 851: 845: 844: 830: 825: 824: 810: 809: 803: 800: 796: 792: 788: 781: 777: 767: 763: 762: 759: 754: 749: 742: 738: 734: 729: 728: 723: 722: 719: 715: 714: 705: 701: 700: 697: 692: 687: 682: 681: 676: 675: 673: 669: 665: 664: 654: 650: 649: 646: 641: 634: 629:living people 625:extra caution 622: 616: 613: 607: 603: 599: 595: 592: 587: 583: 580: 579: 574: 573: 570: 569: 564: 563: 561: 557: 552: 551: 547: 546: 543: 538: 531: 527: 526: 523: 518: 516: 510: 508: 504: 500: 496: 490: 486: 482: 472: 468: 467: 464: 459: 454: 452: 449: 444: 442: 436: 434: 426: 423: 420: 417: 414: 413: 412: 409: 407: 403: 398: 392: 388: 380: 378: 376: 372: 366: 364: 360: 350: 346: 345: 342: 335:Using sources 334: 332: 330: 325: 323: 319: 318:Verifiability 315: 310: 308: 304: 299: 295: 291: 286: 284: 280: 276: 270: 266: 263: 259: 255: 253: 249: 245: 241: 228: 225: 214: 209: 207: 202: 200: 195: 194: 192: 191: 186: 183: 181: 178: 176: 173: 171: 168: 166: 165:Verifiability 163: 161: 158: 156: 153: 152: 151: 150: 146: 141: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 114: 107: 106: 94: 90: 87: 83: 82: 79: 74: 69: 65: 59: 57: 51: 44: 43: 40: 36: 29: 22: 2728: 2719: 2711: 2704: 2696: 2689: 2653:Terms of Use 2638: 2589:WikiProjects 2569: 2506:Lead section 2426:Article size 2407: 2383: 2330: 2320:Enforcement 2260: 2170: 2146:Sockpuppetry 2136:Edit warring 2086: 1996: 1951: 1932: 1908: 1903:Five pillars 1901: 1796: 1786: 1777: 1767: 1759:the original 1749: 1740: 1731: 1723:the original 1713: 1705:the original 1695: 1687:the original 1666:the original 1656: 1648:the original 1638: 1617: 1600: 1576: 1566: 1553: 1540: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1484: 1471: 1450: 1297: 1174: 1168: 1165: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1135: 1098: 1095: 1076: 1035: 1004: 959: 954: 947: 897: 894: 885: 883: 874: 869: 863: 854: 848: 842: 833: 828: 822: 813: 807: 804: 794: 790: 786: 783: 753: 726: 725: 711: 685: 679: 678: 667: 661: 653:WP:SECONDARY 601: 600:that can be 597: 591:undue weight 585: 576: 567: 566: 548: 537: 515:common sense 511: 497:, published 492: 458: 445: 437: 430: 410: 401: 394: 374: 373:. In short, 367: 356: 326: 311: 300: 264: 243: 234: 159: 124:attributable 115: 53: 39: 2297:Attack page 2285:Biographies 1532:documents." 1394:1.5 sources 1177:Jimbo Wales 1160:Main page: 1128:WP:VERIFYOR 1112:Main page: 704:WP:TERTIARY 2746:Categories 2601:User boxes 2596:User pages 2235:Signatures 2111:Harassment 2043:Plagiarism 2011:Notability 1630:References 1456:explicitly 1200:Guidelines 1028:WP:ORMEDIA 999:See also: 938:See also: 930:WP:IMAGEOR 774:See also: 733:due weight 560:considered 530:WP:PRIMARY 448:verifiable 329:talk pages 303:plagiarize 267:verifiable 2608:Shortcuts 2302:Oversight 2250:Deletion 2205:Etiquette 2116:Vandalism 2106:Consensus 1982:Image use 1972:Copyright 1622:history." 1279:Synthesis 1233:Templates 1190:research. 1079:consensus 1047:Shortcuts 915:Shortcuts 787:synthesis 718:compendia 78:Shortcuts 68:consensus 2613:Subpages 2479:Contents 2448:Hatnotes 2373:Editing 2355:Blocking 2101:Civility 2076:Conduct 2031:Medicine 1922:Content 1571:sources. 1195:See also 1120:Shortcut 1069:WP:2+2=4 1020:Shortcut 983:Shortcut 766:WP:SYNTH 758:Shortcut 696:Shortcut 645:Shortcut 522:Shortcut 495:reliable 463:Shortcut 341:Shortcut 305:them or 271:verified 64:normally 2511:Linking 2438:Be bold 2350:Banning 1083:sources 1055:WP:CALC 795:only if 686:only if 605:source. 471:WP:PSTS 273:via an 2501:Layout 2496:Images 1608:, and 1466:, etc. 1352:Essays 942:, and 727:Policy 680:Policy 631:; see 618:Do not 609:Do not 568:Policy 487:, and 277:. The 93:WP:NOR 56:policy 2516:Lists 2467:Style 1491:(see 1425:Notes 1144:, it 923:WP:OI 889:them. 406:below 126:to a 86:WP:OR 1557:The 1520:The 1501:The 1475:The 1291:AEIS 1146:must 1142:true 778:and 739:and 623:Use 584:Any 505:and 389:and 316:and 292:able 287:must 2630:(?) 2627:WMF 2561:(?) 2375:(?) 2322:(?) 2252:(?) 2078:(?) 1924:(?) 1891:(?) 1169:all 238:On 229:own 2748:: 2718:: 2703:: 1795:. 1776:. 1739:. 1674:^ 1462:, 1433:^ 1294:}} 1288:{{ 1282:}} 1276:{{ 1270:}} 1267:OR 1264:{{ 1258:}} 1252:{{ 1246:}} 1240:{{ 1152:. 1093:. 1085:. 1010:. 969:. 797:a 743:). 660:A 483:, 435:. 408:. 377:. 324:. 298:. 296:ed 242:, 2714:G 2699:P 2642:P 2573:G 2411:G 2387:P 2334:P 2264:P 2174:G 2090:P 2000:G 1978:) 1974:( 1936:P 1879:e 1872:t 1865:v 1612:. 1548:. 1495:) 881:N 861:Y 840:N 820:N 544:. 212:e 205:t 198:v 134:. 70:. 58:. 37:. 30:. 23:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Norway
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Oregon
Knowledge (XXG):No original research/Noticeboard
policy
normally
consensus
Shortcuts
WP:OR
WP:NOR
does not publish original thought
attributable
reliable, published source
§ Routine calculations
Content policies
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Article titles
Biographies of living persons
Image use policy
What Knowledge (XXG) is not
v
t
e

Knowledge (XXG)
reliable, published source
reaches or implies a conclusion not stated by the sources
inline citation
verifiability policy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑