2339:
music. This should be reason for it _to_ be on
Knowledge. Like I said, we've recieved plenty of accolades and everything is verifiable. We've been reviewed by the Recorded A Cappella Review Board (RARB) and recieved flying marks (4.7/5). If a radio spot, multiple accolades from CASA, being on BOCA, flying remarks from RARB, touring every year around the country and in the metro-Boston area, etc. isn't enough to be considered notable for a collegiate group, I don't know what is. Oh, I forgot to mention, we also host the International Championship of Collegiate A Cappella (ICCA) semifinals every year; it's the largest and most notable a cappella competition in existence.
1291:- a position that is polar opposite to my own stated poitical belief on my user page. One might therefore suggest that this user felt that anything asserting the existance of Northern Irish people is contrary to the stated political idiom of Irish Republicanism which clearly rejects any notion that a separate state could exist on the island of Ireland. Again though, this is irrelevant - we are editors here because we deal in facts. The fact is that Northern Irish people exist. What more evidence do you need?
1143:"Deletion review" is not to be confused with "please determine if a racial sub-group exists or not". Nobody here is saying that they don't exist, and their existence is largely irrelevant to the purpose of this section of Knowledge, which is to determine if deleted items (articles, templates, whatever) were done so improperly. An AfD was opened, discussed, closed, and the article was deleted, all in accordance with Knowledge policy. As a result, everyone (so far) has endorsed the deletion.
1331:
time before proposing the deletion, to give me (or others) time to develop the article from its skeletal form. Unfortunately, due to the relative complexity (not least in regard to political sensitivities) and the fact that I became rather more busy in Real Life™, I didn't have the time to improve it. I will have the time in the forthcoming month to get the article up to the standard of similar articles though.
2326:. So I don't think the contested touring experience is sufficient to overturn this closure. Ideally, article creators should be notified of afd nomination, but that seems to be a minority practice on afd (I always try to do it myself), and I've never seen lack of article creator notification overturn an afd deletion closure (since the main point is to find consensus in the broader community)
1327:. Nor is it unverifiable. Plenty of sources can be found which prove these peoples exist. It seems to me that anyone who is not familiar with the Northern Irish could be served well by an encyclopedia article on the people who make up that population. Indeed, examples of numerous such articles can be found on Knowledge and, as I said, I based the creation of this article on some of those.
2322:
However, given the trend observable in the swathe of
Collegiate A Capella afds that took place over the last month or so, I think there's been a rough community consensus that groups that go on tours, get recognition for best CD etc from CASA, get published on the annual Best of... CD from CASA, get written up in the student newspaper etc - that this isn't enough to pass
1166:
misunderstood (and also neglected). The article subject is verifiable, notable and consistant with many other similar articles and therefore, quite obviously, belongs in this encyclopedia. If all this page is for is to clarify whether or not the article in question was deleted properly, then I assume there would be no objections if someone were to re-create it. --
160:
rotate from campus to campus. The administrator clearly misread and said the project was temporary, which isn't true. I wrote that the pictures are only posted temporarily at a particular campus. However, the project is ongoing. Therefore, since it is a well recognized on going project, it is notable and should be reinstated onto
Knowledge.
433:. I don't see how deleting an article about a valid, encyclopedic topic, upheld by dozens of users in AfDs is "improving or maintaining Knowledge". Note also that Duja already voted for deletion of the article in second nomination, so now he is using his admin abilities on an article he was already involved with.
2338:
We do, in fact, go on tour every year to a different region of the country (and are planning an international tour at some point in the near future). Being relatively new shouldn't make you immediately non-notable. The entire genre of a cappella is new and up-and-coming, compared with other genres of
2273:
took a look at that issue since he posted the edit history above. Second, it would be very unusual if someone AfD'ed an article without posting a template since the template on the article is an integral part of the whole AfD'ing process. I know from experience that the link can be messed up when you
542:
is one that nobody notices. Obviously, someone noticed. The fallback is for the rule ignorer to persuade the community that they improved the encyclopedia by deleting this. I've just now dropped the DRVNote flag on the deleting admin's page, but they have declared a wikibreak, so they may not even
2481:
It clearly has sources, as listed above. Furthermore, it's absurd that at any point an article may be deleted within a few days just because people didn't visit it within those few days. One AfD should not throw away an article forever, especially if their have been previous AfDs saying keep. That's
2455:
Daniel: There was clearly new evidence presented as there was NO evidence presented at the second AfD discussion. I'm not saying keep the page because "I like it." I'm saying keep the page because the group _is_ notable, and certainly encyclopedically notable if you're talking about the most notable
2414:
We're clearly notable within our sphere of influence and our genre. I'm not saying it's an adverse judgment on our musical ability, but it's definitely an ignorant statement to say we're nn just because we're part of a smaller genre (note that I'm not calling anyone ignorant; just that the statement
1995:
Thank you for taking the time to review the article. After reviewing the articles, and as the author, I will also endorse deletion of the article. As a note, it is much easier to understand this way, given that actual discussions and reasons have been given--rather than to come back from lunch and
1916:
The talk page is normally for discussing an article. However, in deletion related debates, the discussion is held on the applicable deletion page. This allows folks who might not stumble across the article to easily see the debate and contribute. Placing your comments on the talk page caused no harm
1713:
Per Fan-1967's link above, the man's only claim to notability is a minor award given to several hundred scoutleaders per year and never covered in media except
Scouting internal newsletters and an occasional note in the local-trivia section of local newspapers. I wouldn't speedy-delete this were it
1572:
as the deleting admin. Article subject was a Boy Scout volunteer and school administrator. No claim of notability provided so speedied under CSD A7 and author notified with {{nn-notice}} template. Based upon his response on my talk page, I believe his terming this an "Unqualified" speedy deletion is
578:
The deletion was announced (and widely acclaimed by the commenters) at AN/I, (see link provided by Calton). A speedy closure of DRV after 4 hours, without a chance of a wider input, and without giving anyone a chance to see a bigger picture. It was an out-of-process deletion indeed, but
Knowledge is
2288:
This is the proper forum to get this undeleted but the nomination is based on a false factual claim, as I noted above. The nomination on the article page linked to the wrong discussion for all of 3 minutes, and then was changed to the correct (2nd) discussion, after which the article was not edited
2256:
The issue of how this AfD was closed is that nobody knew about it! The few people who check AfD knew about it, but the people who regularly visit the Wiki page didn't. Look at the disparity between how many comments there were in the original AfD and in the second one. Clearly something went wrong,
1330:
Finally I would like to say that, as far as I can recall (I can't tell for sure because the discussion took place on the article's talk page, which has also been deleted), the initial discussions with the user who proposed the deletion indicate that s/he had patiently waited for a certain length of
2321:
and does not represent a major media channel or an authoritative music criticism source (even if it did, I'm not sure if a "Artist of the Month" interview is sufficient recognition for
Knowledge). If the group does indeed tour regionally, then Ohconfucious's statement that they don't was mistaken.
2199:
For one thing, we thought this whole deletion review was over since the first decision was keep. I guarantee that the link to the later discussion was not posted on the main page. The first one was, originally. And then it was clean. Anyway, we listed reasons in the first discussion as to why the
159:
The administrator clearly misread the article. The article is about an ongoing pro life project in which pictures of aborted fetuses are posted at university campuses. It is a project that most pro lifers and most pro choicers in North
America are aware of it. It is very notable. The pictures
1165:
Is this not the place to object to deletions? My apologies if I am in error, but I was under the impression that it was. I am not contesting whether proper procedure had taken place - I am objecting to the fact that the article in question was proposed for deletion because it's purpose was
870:. I think we have too many company-related articles and I favor tightening WP:CORP for COI reasons, but when it's a defunct company it's less of a problem. Anyway someone should write a new article, I suspect what was there before was a useless stub and that's why it looked like an advt.
1286:
than the claim made at the onset of the deletion process - that claim was that the creation of the article was POV. Indeed, one could take a quick look at the userpage of the person that proposed the deletion of the article, and quickly discover that the user considers his or herself an
2278:
was trying to correct. Also, the number of comments on the first AfD was influenced by the fact that it was relisted. If you can ask an admin to recreate the revision just prior to deletion and thereby prove that the template was missing from the article you got a case. Otherwise not.
1966:, it's a featured article and one of our best, and never going to be deleted. However, nobody would argue that all 1.5 million Eagle scouts should be given their own articles, nor would being an Eagle scout generally be considered a claim of notability in a biography article.
2167:
The decision was keep on the first discussion, and the second discussion was never listed on the main article's page; only the first one was ever listed. At the very least, there should be another (listed) discussion so people have a chance to speak their minds.
1950:
After all, we have articles on military honors such as (U.S.) the bronze and silver stars. However, our guidelines say that notability is only considered automatic for winners of the highest honors, such as (U.S. again) the
Congressional Medal of Honor.
2257:
no? Sure, I know I'm biased, being in the group, but I'm speaking for everybody I've spoken to (including people outside the group). If this isn't the proper forum to get this undeleted (and possibly relisted in AfD) please tell me what is.
2200:
decision should be keep. We've been on Best of
College A Cappella 2006, we were voted runner-up for favorite a cappella group by the Contemporary A Cappella Society of America (CASA) and our latest CD, Left On Red, was voted favorite CD. (
1940:
There is a significant difference between having an article and being mentioned in an article. Every topic is going to have individual items that are not that notable on their own, but that provide back-ground information of interest.
1178:. I suggest you read it, since it seems to me that you're just sore that the article was deleted, a perception I wouldn't have if you were to provide any evidence to back up your (rather nebulous) claim at the onset of this review.
1847:
We don't write articles about people who go quietly about their business. Also, per Fan-1967, I am seriously worried about the very real prospect of 50,000 people with no other qualification with an encyclopedia article.
1831:- valid application of policy, little assertion of notability, not really reliable sources, does not seem at all verified. Having a job and getting a minor award does not make you anywhere near notable. Correct speedy.
833:
or
General-11 apply, IMO - I mean, it explicitly states that it's a defunct company, so it's difficult to make a case for it being blatant advertising, and notability was asserted. Don't know what "no country" means.
2456:
groups in a cappella. Stop throwing the WP:COI argument at me; just because not all too many people read these AfD pages doesn't mean I have a COI. Not to mention that I'm speaking for multiple people I've spoken to.
601:
concerns of the deleter, but I am rather annoyed about the DRV closing so fast. If process is important (as the overturn "votes" above insist surely it is no less important at DRV. 15:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
415:
2212:
There have been plenty of reviews and articles written about us in The Tech, MIT's student newspaper. We sang at Susan Hockfield's inauguration (the current President of MIT). I mean, I could go on...
2645:, I'm having some difficulty seeing what the alleged problem with this process was, it looks perfectly proper to me - and the result also seems to be in keeping with precedent, policy and guidelines.
1776:
Actually, yes, if he disagrees with a speedy, it wasn't a valid speedy. Speedy deletion is only supposed to be for cases where any uninvolved observer would agree with deletion. There's a reason that
450:
figleaf. If there are problems with the article, edit the content or submit it for a third good-faith afd nomination (third existing afd was speedy keep due to bad faith) after a proper grace period.
419:
225:
189:
150:
71:
562:
1294:
Don't dare to assume what how I feel about any given matter by the way. I may be "sore", or I may not - that is irrelevant (actually, a rather more appropriate description would be
1001:
1681:, over 50,000 people have received the "Silver Beaver" award from their local councils since 1931, which would mean several hundred a year) as being an assertion of notability.
1374:
page (well sourced in the sense or reliable sources that explicitely say that Northen Irish is a separate ethnicity), and (3) come back here well prepared. Easy as 1-2-3 :-) `'
2504:
I don't see sources. And swinging the pendulum so far that a single AfD closed as keep disqualifies deletion forever is just as absurd as anything you're complaining about. -
2386:, valid AfD correctly closed. Nominator might want to know that having an article on you deleted from Knowledge is not an adverse judgement on your musical ability. --
2158:
543:
return to make their case in a timely fashion. I can't conceive of a solid case for deleting this without taking it to AFD, but I remain open to them making a case.
1651:. Not sure what the text was when it was speedied, but the talk page of the article contains an assertion of notability that should go to the greater community. --
1813:
I think the key is that CSD is for cases where the overwhelming majority of people would agree with a speedy. Theoretically, no article would get 100% agreement.
115:
110:
48:
34:
2462:; whether or not it's notable, it doesn't have sources. Also, the idea that it should somehow be undeleted because a previous AfD was closed as keep is absurd. -
1931:
If the Silver Beaver is indeed considered "non-notable" then shouldn't the article on the Silver Buffalo award be modified (see aforementioned "talk" section)?--
2319:
119:
1845:"The Silver Beaver is the highest award given to those who go quietly about their business implementing the Scouting program and performing community service."
1860:
Being a public school administrator and winning a minor scouting award does not confer notability. Unverified and no assertion of notability. Valid speedy.--
411:
401:
144:
102:
43:
1504:
1499:
1508:
966:
961:
970:
2620:
They pass WP:MUSIC as per the first AfD. That precedent is bullshit; you cannot rate say a group isn't notable just because it is a student group.
1533:
1491:
2623:
2523:
2485:
605:
516:. That aside, the apparent COI related to the contribution of the deleter to the second debate makes this an open-and-shut case. I actually urge
1539:
995:
953:
2186:
03:48, 15 December 2006 . . Ohconfucius (Talk | contribs | block) 03:45, 15 December 2006 . . Ohconfucius (Talk | contribs | block) (AfD)
1248:
tag) may be undeleted, without further discussion, on a reasonable request. Any admin can be asked to do this, or a request may be made at
1302:
and to be civil. I created the article in good faith, following the examples set by other similar articles already existant in Knowledge.
2239:
I see nothing wrong with how this AfD was closed. To the person above... this is not round 2 of AfD and you might want to take a look at
1573:
that he believed the General criteria where the only CSD criteria. It should be noted that this article was previously speedy deleted by
2123:
2118:
1963:
2627:
2575:
2552:
2527:
2510:
2489:
2468:
2355:
2228:
2127:
1786:
1398:
888:
280:
247:
210:
2204:) We toured the Northeast in 2005 and toured Florida in 2006. We were also chosen to be Artist of the Month by WERS 88.9. Interview:
1637:
I'm not sure if it would be speediable, but I recommend posting the reasoning behind the nomination here and not on the talk page. ~
1321:"it's best to base arguments on the policies of no original research, verifiability, use reliable sources and what Knowledge is not."
2077:
2072:
176:
39:
2593:
per valid AfD, WP:MUSIC, and the overwhelming amount of precedent that student groups at a single school are almost never notable.
1714:
my decision, seeing that one editor thinks the claim is notable, but I don't see this as having any chance to survive a new AfD.
642:
Yup, I jumped the gun (I make no illusions about that; my bad), but the article is running through AfD right now, meaning that it
2110:
2081:
1272:. But I am asking you: evidence of what? That Northern Irish people exist? I can assure you all, most categorically, that we do.
617:
770:
366:
361:
106:
1230:
OK people - some of you are admins I think. But you haven't been particularly helpful. The following paragraph, from the page
2152:
2064:
735:
730:
370:
2562:
How are CASA and RARB unreliable? They are valid organizations which deal in a cappella. WERS is a licensed radio station...
2520:
Look at the second bullet point in this thread for the sources I refer to. And that was exactly my point, it _is_ absurd.
739:
632:
works in both ways, not to mention the snowball clause: quite a few persons considered this an uncalled-for violation. `'
21:
646:
be deleted through the proper process soon. I think I'll just stick to !voting in reviews, rather than closing them. ;-)
2189:
Is there anything else you challenge this AfD on? Otherwise I will close it speedily. (PS Correct links added above.) ~
395:
353:
2201:
1231:
764:
722:
1904:
1553:
1495:
1412:
Indeed. I don't think you understand what Deletion Review is for, Mal, which is why I provided a link for you above.
957:
535:
98:
67:
1344:
the place to request undeletion, please direct me to the section of Knowledge that is. Thank you for your time. --
593:
I don't have strong feelings about endorsing the deletion since it was clearly out of process (though I share the
2669:
2043:
2011:
1470:
1442:
1175:
932:
904:
701:
673:
332:
304:
81:
17:
1487:
1460:
1767:
1728:
1695:
1656:
855:
499:
2482:
absurd...someone could just as easily keep nominating an article for deletion until they get lucky one day.
1876:
per lack of notability and verifiability to the point that this would never in a billion years pass an AfD.
1355:
2658:
2635:
2612:
2580:
2557:
2535:
2515:
2497:
2473:
2450:
2426:
2415:
is as such). If we're one of the more notable groups within a cappella (which we are), then we're notable!
2409:
2390:
2378:
2330:
2305:
2283:
2261:
2251:
2193:
2172:
2000:
1985:
1955:
1945:
1935:
1921:
1911:
1895:
1868:
1852:
1835:
1817:
1808:
1791:
1771:
1757:
1732:
1718:
1699:
1685:
1669:
1660:
1641:
1632:
1620:
1601:
1585:
1563:
1429:
1403:
1378:
1371:
1348:
1221:
1195:
1170:
1160:
1138:
1126:
1101:
1078:
1069:
1057:
1043:
1031:
1014:
893:
874:
859:
842:
821:
787:
663:
636:
588:
573:
547:
526:
503:
482:
470:
454:
437:
285:
265:
252:
232:
215:
196:
2631:
2531:
2493:
2351:
2224:
467:
1763:
1724:
1691:
1678:
1652:
871:
851:
495:
2068:
1313:
949:
922:
434:
172:
2347:
2220:
2169:
2294:
2258:
224:
Likely a new editor unsure of process. The appropriate process at this stage is to offer arguments in
168:
2387:
2343:
2302:
2270:
2216:
2190:
2114:
1861:
1737:
Ah, but by the criteria that "I wouldn't speedy because badlydrawnjeff thinks the claim is notable",
1666:
1638:
1075:
1054:
839:
613:
164:
479:
2569:
Being a valid organization does not make you reliable, nor does being a licensed radio station. -
2446:
2209:
1309:
1217:
522:
2437:
2399:
2315:
Regarding the new or revisited references presented above - WERS 88.9 is the radio station of
1997:
1932:
1908:
1610:
1560:
1212:
1091:
800:, as there was an assertion ("among the nation's very oldest producers of radio equipment").
2275:
2179:
2178:
That's incorrect, the nomination with a link to the first discussion was created at 3:45 by
1422:
1288:
1188:
1153:
1119:
814:
656:
570:
513:
357:
2323:
2316:
2106:
2033:
1849:
1629:
1418:
1354:
I suggest you to do the following: (1) get yourself very familiar with wikipedia policies
1345:
1184:
1167:
1149:
1135:
1115:
1066:
1040:
1011:
810:
784:
726:
652:
609:
2594:
2244:
1967:
1942:
1918:
1877:
1582:
1578:
1389:
1363:
598:
584:
520:, as this was clearly not the best way to go about deleting this article, crap or not.
2418:
We're not saying your group is not notable in general, we're saying your group is not
2653:
2647:
2441:
2375:
2367:
2298:
2290:
2280:
2248:
2240:
2060:
2029:
1952:
1832:
1814:
1805:
1797:
1777:
1754:
1682:
1598:
1375:
1359:
1324:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1242:
1028:
830:
801:
797:
780:
633:
625:
539:
491:
463:
447:
429:
262:
229:
193:
2202:
http://casa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=346&Itemid=149
508:
Although I'm a serial endorser of deletions normally, this one I must say should be
2570:
2547:
2543:
2505:
2463:
1781:
1393:
1367:
883:
594:
544:
275:
242:
205:
2144:
2098:
1844:
1525:
987:
796:
if for no other reason than that a specific criteria wasn't declared. It can't be
756:
387:
136:
2208:
I can't find the article choosing us as AOTM, but you can hear a recording here:
2423:
2327:
1628:
Assuming the deletion is endorsed, shouldn't the talk page then be speedied? --
779:
Historically significant US company, out of business, not advertising, links to
566:
451:
349:
322:
192:. Deletion review is for challenging decisions that have already been made. --
1715:
1413:
1179:
1144:
1110:
805:
718:
691:
647:
579:
not a bureaucracy. Oh well, guess I'll have to get rid of this the hard way.
868:
629:
580:
512:, and taken to AFD if wanted. AfD trumps CSD, always, with the exception of
423:
1800:
away, as badlydrawnjeff will object to all speedies on general principle.
882:. I don't understand what speedy criteria this is supposed to fall under. -
2371:
1801:
1750:
1594:
1574:
1024:
1282:
about my claim? I don't see that it could be viewed as any more or less
1593:
as per Jimfbleak (note that I was also one of the speedy deleters).
188:
The article has not been deleted. It is currently being discussed at
1903:
Since all the discussion seems to be taking place here, what is the
1010:
Objection to POV proposal, or lack of understanding of the subject.
446:
Evidently a case where admin powers have been abused under a flimsy
2205:
241:
Possibly, but it's written as if t he article is already deleted. -
1388:. You seem to be under the impression that it was deleted through
556:
The following comments were added after the closure of this DRV:
2274:
AfD for the 2. time and I believe this is the exact error that
1917:
as you told everyone above so they would be able to find it. --
416:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Serbophobia (second nomination)
2210:
http://web.mit.edu/resonance/www/media/audio/wersresonance.mp3
420:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Serbophobia (third nomination)
1962:
It's apples and oranges. For example, we have an article on
1323:
Northern Irish people, and the existance thereof, is hardly
274:
Oh. Well then speedy close this, it was already undeleted. -
2440:
arguments being thrown around means absolute nothing here,
1234:, is how I came to add this entry on this page. It states:
1996:
find the article deleted with no real explanation given.--
190:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Genocide Awareness Project
1134:
Nevertheless, Northern Irish people continue to exist. --
1780:
doesn't just say "If it has no chance of passing AfD". -
1749:
be speedied, which is the way badlydrawnjeff wants it.
2140:
2136:
2132:
2094:
2090:
2086:
1521:
1517:
1513:
983:
979:
975:
752:
748:
744:
383:
379:
375:
132:
128:
124:
2436:, DRV is not AfD round II, no new evidence presented,
1723:
So you wouldn't speedy, but you endorse the speedy? --
694:– Deletion overturned – 21:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
325:– Deletion overturned – 03:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1677:
I don't see an award from a local scout council (per
261:
Log shows it was deleted, then restored. Now in AFD.
410:
This is a valid article, which survived three AfDs (
2036:– Deletion endorsed – 01:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
1463:– Deletion endorsed – 01:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
925:– Deletion endorsed – 01:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
70:— Speedy close, the article is being discussed on
1548:Reasons not to delete (especially the subject of
1238:Articles deleted under this procedure (using the
1319:The guide for deletion discussions states this:
1268:part, and that is why you are suggesting I need
1211:, DRV is not AfD II, no new evidence presented,
2182:and corrected to the second discussion at 3:48:
1312:, and I might just as well suggest to you that
1308:the last part of your comment is hardly very
1252:, but such undeleted articles are open to be
8:
1264:Perhaps some of you have a problem with the
2042:The following is an archived debate of the
1469:The following is an archived debate of the
1053:of this missourced, inaccurate sentence. --
931:The following is an archived debate of the
700:The following is an archived debate of the
412:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Serbophobia
331:The following is an archived debate of the
80:The following is an archived debate of the
2025:
1456:
918:
687:
318:
63:
867:This was definitely a well-known company
804:? Maybe, though that's highly debatable.
2289:until it was recreated as a redirect to
466:does not create a license to run amuck.
2668:The above is an archived debate of the
2297:, as a clear and seemingly uncontested
2010:The above is an archived debate of the
1441:The above is an archived debate of the
1074:The entirety of the article's prose. --
903:The above is an archived debate of the
829:. Even if they had been cited, neither
672:The above is an archived debate of the
303:The above is an archived debate of the
1065:Which sentence are you refering to? --
1039:What "new evidence" would you like? --
838:due to lack of independent sources. --
204:? A failsafe in case the AfD fails? -
7:
1370:(2) create a well-sourced draft in
1023:, unanimous AfD, no new evidence.
561:Y'all weren't paying attention to
494:is piss-poor policy" for $ 200. --
28:
1176:Knowledge:Deletion review#Purpose
2206:http://wers.org/articles/?id=213
1665:Edit history is restored now. ~
74:— 19:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
538:, a legitimate application of
422:) but was recently deleted by
1:
2659:21:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
2636:17:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
2613:14:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
2581:06:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
2558:05:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
2536:05:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
2516:03:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
2498:23:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
2474:16:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
2451:02:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
2427:21:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2410:20:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2391:18:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2379:17:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2331:09:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2306:09:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2284:08:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2262:08:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2252:08:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2194:07:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2173:07:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
2001:16:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1986:15:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1956:15:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1946:15:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1936:14:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1922:15:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1912:14:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1896:14:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1869:06:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
1853:21:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1836:18:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1818:19:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1809:18:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1792:18:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1772:18:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1758:18:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1733:16:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1719:16:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1700:14:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1686:14:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1670:01:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1661:00:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1642:00:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1633:20:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1621:20:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1602:16:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1586:16:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1564:16:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1430:21:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1404:16:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1379:21:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1349:08:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1222:02:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1196:03:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1171:01:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1161:01:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1139:00:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1127:21:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1102:20:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1079:02:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1070:00:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1058:18:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1044:00:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
1032:16:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
1015:13:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
894:16:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
875:04:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
860:00:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
843:21:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
822:21:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
788:19:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
664:21:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
637:19:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
589:14:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
574:07:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
548:03:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
527:02:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
504:00:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
483:22:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
471:21:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
455:21:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
438:21:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
286:17:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
266:17:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
253:16:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
233:16:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
216:16:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
197:14:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
2618:Strong overturn and undelete
1796:Then we might as well throw
1559:Unqualified Speedy Delition
1109:, AfD procedure was proper.
2444:apparent. *breathes again*
1338:for undeletion. If this is
1232:Knowledge:Proposed deletion
2695:
536:Knowledge:Use common sense
518:speedy overturn and relist
99:Genocide Awareness Project
68:Genocide Awareness Project
2546:, not just any sources. -
1266:"on a reasonable request"
1250:WP:DRV#Proposed deletions
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
2675:Please do not modify it.
2049:Please do not modify it.
2017:Please do not modify it.
1476:Please do not modify it.
1448:Please do not modify it.
938:Please do not modify it.
910:Please do not modify it.
707:Please do not modify it.
679:Please do not modify it.
338:Please do not modify it.
310:Please do not modify it.
87:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
1907:page for (see above)?--
1356:wikipedia:Verifiability
226:the Deletion Discussion
2672:of the article above.
2046:of the article above.
2014:of the article above.
1552:) are detailed on the
1473:of the article above.
1445:of the article above.
1260:under the usual rules.
935:of the article above.
907:of the article above.
704:of the article above.
676:of the article above.
490:. I'll take "Reasons
335:of the article above.
307:of the article above.
84:of the article above.
2626:comment was added by
2526:comment was added by
2488:comment was added by
2479:Overturn and undelete
2336:Overturn and undelete
1372:User:Setanta747/Draft
950:Northern Irish people
923:Northern Irish people
608:comment was added by
2370:violations abound.
2366:, nn musical group,
2271:User:trialsanderrors
1360:no original research
1334:I believe this is a
2293:on December 22 by
1762:Not really, no. --
1336:reasonable request
1298:). Your job is to
2682:
2681:
2657:
2639:
2579:
2556:
2539:
2514:
2501:
2472:
2360:
2346:comment added by
2233:
2219:comment added by
2024:
2023:
1790:
1770:
1731:
1711:Endorse deletion.
1698:
1659:
1455:
1454:
1402:
1314:you don't like it
1300:assume good faith
1280:"rather nebulous"
1256:or nominated for
917:
916:
892:
880:Overturn deletion
858:
794:Overturn Deletion
686:
685:
621:
502:
468:Danny Lilithborne
428:Delete crap. See
317:
316:
284:
251:
214:
181:
167:comment added by
2686:
2677:
2651:
2643:Endorse deletion
2621:
2610:
2607:
2604:
2601:
2591:Endorse deletion
2573:
2550:
2544:reliable sources
2521:
2508:
2483:
2466:
2460:Endorse deletion
2434:Endorse deletion
2420:encyclopedically
2407:
2402:
2396:Endorse Deletion
2384:Endorse deletion
2359:
2340:
2295:User:Mborohovski
2276:User:Ohconfucius
2232:
2213:
2180:User:Ohconfucius
2148:
2130:
2102:
2084:
2051:
2026:
2019:
1993:Endorse Deletion
1983:
1980:
1977:
1974:
1893:
1890:
1887:
1884:
1874:Endorse deletion
1858:Endorse deletion
1841:Endorse deletion
1829:Endorse deletion
1784:
1766:
1727:
1694:
1655:
1618:
1613:
1607:Endorse Deletion
1591:Endorse deletion
1570:Endorse deletion
1529:
1511:
1488:Ken "Pope" Parry
1478:
1461:Ken "Pope" Parry
1457:
1450:
1428:
1425:
1396:
1386:Endorse deletion
1368:reliable sources
1289:Irish Republican
1254:speedily deleted
1247:
1241:
1209:Endorse deletion
1194:
1191:
1159:
1156:
1125:
1122:
1107:Endorse Deletion
1099:
1094:
1088:Endorse Deletion
1051:Endorse deletion
1021:Endorse deletion
991:
973:
940:
919:
912:
886:
854:
820:
817:
760:
742:
709:
688:
681:
662:
659:
603:
587:
498:
391:
373:
340:
319:
312:
278:
245:
208:
180:
161:
140:
122:
89:
64:
59:26 December 2006
53:
49:2006 December 27
35:2006 December 25
33:
2694:
2693:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2673:
2670:deletion review
2622:—The preceding
2608:
2605:
2602:
2599:
2578:
2555:
2522:—The preceding
2513:
2484:—The preceding
2471:
2403:
2400:
2364:Endorse closure
2341:
2317:Emerson College
2313:Endorse closure
2303:trialsanderrors
2237:Endorse closure
2214:
2191:trialsanderrors
2187:
2163:
2157:
2151:
2121:
2107:Resonance (MIT)
2105:
2075:
2059:
2047:
2044:deletion review
2034:Resonance (MIT)
2015:
2012:deletion review
1981:
1978:
1975:
1972:
1891:
1888:
1885:
1882:
1789:
1667:trialsanderrors
1639:trialsanderrors
1614:
1611:
1544:
1538:
1532:
1502:
1486:
1474:
1471:deletion review
1446:
1443:deletion review
1423:
1416:
1401:
1392:. It was not. -
1245:
1239:
1189:
1182:
1154:
1147:
1120:
1113:
1095:
1092:
1006:
1000:
994:
964:
948:
936:
933:deletion review
908:
905:deletion review
891:
815:
808:
775:
769:
763:
733:
717:
705:
702:deletion review
677:
674:deletion review
657:
650:
604:—The preceding
583:
476:Speedy overturn
444:Speedy Overturn
406:
400:
394:
364:
348:
336:
333:deletion review
308:
305:deletion review
283:
250:
213:
162:
155:
149:
143:
113:
97:
85:
82:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2692:
2690:
2680:
2679:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2640:
2615:
2595:Andrew Lenahan
2588:
2587:
2586:
2583:
2574:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2551:
2542:Okay, I meant
2518:
2509:
2476:
2467:
2457:
2453:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2412:
2393:
2381:
2361:
2333:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2301:recreation. ~
2286:
2269:I assume that
2254:
2234:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2165:
2164:
2161:
2155:
2149:
2103:
2054:
2053:
2038:
2037:
2022:
2021:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1968:Andrew Lenahan
1960:
1959:
1958:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1898:
1878:Andrew Lenahan
1871:
1855:
1838:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1811:
1785:
1774:
1764:badlydrawnjeff
1735:
1725:badlydrawnjeff
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1692:badlydrawnjeff
1690:I disagree. --
1653:badlydrawnjeff
1646:
1645:
1644:
1623:
1604:
1588:
1546:
1545:
1542:
1536:
1530:
1481:
1480:
1465:
1464:
1453:
1452:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1407:
1406:
1397:
1382:
1381:
1306:Daniel.Bryant:
1225:
1224:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1104:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1008:
1007:
1004:
998:
992:
943:
942:
927:
926:
915:
914:
899:
898:
897:
896:
887:
877:
872:67.117.130.181
862:
852:badlydrawnjeff
845:
824:
777:
776:
773:
767:
761:
712:
711:
696:
695:
684:
683:
668:
667:
640:
639:
559:
558:
552:
551:
550:
529:
506:
496:badlydrawnjeff
485:
473:
457:
408:
407:
404:
398:
392:
343:
342:
327:
326:
315:
314:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
279:
269:
268:
256:
255:
246:
236:
235:
219:
218:
209:
199:
157:
156:
153:
147:
141:
92:
91:
76:
75:
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2691:
2678:
2676:
2671:
2666:
2665:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2649:
2644:
2641:
2637:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2619:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2596:
2592:
2589:
2584:
2582:
2577:
2572:
2568:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2554:
2549:
2545:
2541:
2540:
2537:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2519:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2503:
2502:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2487:
2480:
2477:
2475:
2470:
2465:
2461:
2458:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2448:
2447:Daniel.Bryant
2443:
2439:
2435:
2432:
2428:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2398:, valid AFD.
2397:
2394:
2392:
2389:
2385:
2382:
2380:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2362:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2337:
2334:
2332:
2329:
2325:
2320:
2318:
2314:
2311:
2307:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2291:MIT Resonance
2287:
2285:
2282:
2277:
2272:
2268:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2260:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2235:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2192:
2181:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2171:
2160:
2154:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2129:
2125:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2083:
2079:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2061:MIT Resonance
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2052:
2050:
2045:
2040:
2039:
2035:
2031:
2030:MIT Resonance
2028:
2027:
2020:
2018:
2013:
2008:
2007:
2002:
1999:
1998:Paul McDonald
1994:
1991:
1987:
1984:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1954:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1944:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1934:
1933:Paul McDonald
1930:
1927:
1923:
1920:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1910:
1909:Paul McDonald
1906:
1902:
1899:
1897:
1894:
1879:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1859:
1856:
1854:
1851:
1846:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1834:
1830:
1827:
1819:
1816:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1788:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1747:
1742:
1741:
1736:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1717:
1712:
1709:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1647:
1643:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1631:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1571:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1562:
1561:Paul McDonald
1557:
1555:
1551:
1541:
1535:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1510:
1506:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1459:
1458:
1451:
1449:
1444:
1439:
1438:
1431:
1426:
1420:
1415:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1384:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1337:
1332:
1328:
1326:
1322:
1317:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1301:
1297:
1292:
1290:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1271:
1267:
1262:
1261:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1244:
1235:
1233:
1229:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:Daniel.Bryant
1214:
1210:
1207:
1197:
1192:
1186:
1181:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1169:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1151:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1123:
1117:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1090:, valid AFD.
1089:
1086:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1013:
1003:
997:
989:
985:
981:
977:
972:
968:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
946:
945:
944:
941:
939:
934:
929:
928:
924:
921:
920:
913:
911:
906:
901:
900:
895:
890:
885:
881:
878:
876:
873:
869:
866:
863:
861:
857:
853:
850:per above. --
849:
846:
844:
841:
837:
832:
828:
825:
823:
818:
812:
807:
803:
799:
795:
792:
791:
790:
789:
786:
782:
781:amateur radio
772:
766:
758:
754:
750:
746:
741:
737:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
715:
714:
713:
710:
708:
703:
698:
697:
693:
690:
689:
682:
680:
675:
670:
669:
666:
665:
660:
654:
649:
645:
638:
635:
631:
628:advocated by
627:
624:
623:
622:
619:
615:
611:
607:
600:
596:
591:
590:
586:
582:
576:
575:
572:
568:
564:
557:
554:
553:
549:
546:
541:
537:
533:
530:
528:
525:
524:
523:Daniel.Bryant
519:
515:
511:
507:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
484:
481:
478:, per nom. --
477:
474:
472:
469:
465:
461:
458:
456:
453:
449:
445:
442:
441:
440:
439:
436:
432:
431:
426:with comment
425:
421:
417:
413:
403:
397:
389:
385:
381:
377:
372:
368:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
344:
341:
339:
334:
329:
328:
324:
321:
320:
313:
311:
306:
301:
300:
287:
282:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
267:
264:
260:
259:
258:
257:
254:
249:
244:
240:
239:
238:
237:
234:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
217:
212:
207:
203:
200:
198:
195:
191:
187:
184:
183:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
152:
146:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
94:
93:
90:
88:
83:
78:
77:
73:
69:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
44:2006 December
41:
36:
23:
19:
2674:
2667:
2646:
2642:
2628:71.247.24.74
2617:
2598:
2590:
2528:71.247.24.74
2490:71.247.24.74
2478:
2459:
2445:
2433:
2419:
2404:
2395:
2388:Sam Blanning
2383:
2363:
2348:71.247.24.74
2342:— Preceding
2335:
2312:
2266:
2236:
2221:71.247.24.74
2215:— Preceding
2188:
2170:71.247.24.74
2166:
2048:
2041:
2016:
2009:
1992:
1971:
1964:Eagle scouts
1928:
1900:
1881:
1873:
1863:
1862:
1857:
1840:
1828:
1745:
1744:
1739:
1738:
1710:
1674:
1648:
1625:
1615:
1606:
1590:
1569:
1558:
1549:
1547:
1475:
1468:
1447:
1440:
1385:
1340:
1339:
1335:
1333:
1329:
1320:
1318:
1305:
1304:
1299:
1295:
1293:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1269:
1265:
1263:
1237:
1236:
1227:
1226:
1216:
1215:applicable.
1208:
1131:
1106:
1096:
1087:
1076:Sam Blanning
1062:
1055:Sam Blanning
1050:
1036:
1020:
1009:
937:
930:
909:
902:
879:
864:
847:
840:Sam Blanning
835:
826:
793:
778:
706:
699:
678:
671:
643:
641:
592:
577:
560:
555:
531:
521:
517:
509:
487:
475:
462:per Bwithh,
459:
443:
427:
409:
337:
330:
309:
302:
202:What is this
201:
186:Speedy close
185:
163:— Preceding
158:
86:
79:
58:
2259:Mborohovski
1609:per above.
1296:incredulous
836:List on AfD
350:Serbophobia
323:Serbophobia
169:Raindreamer
2585:What does?
2438:WP:ILIKEIT
1929:Question 2
1901:Question 1
1850:AnonEMouse
1630:Kicking222
1550:notability
1270:"evidence"
1213:WP:ILIKEIT
831:Articles-7
785:LuckyLouie
719:Hammarlund
692:Hammarlund
610:Eluchil404
565:, then. --
510:overturned
2299:WP:CSD#G4
1943:JLaTondre
1919:JLaTondre
1679:this link
1583:JLaTondre
1579:Jimfbleak
514:WP:OFFICE
480:Еstavisti
424:User:Duja
2624:unsigned
2524:unsigned
2486:unsigned
2422:notable
2372:User:Zoe
2356:contribs
2344:unsigned
2324:WP:MUSIC
2281:MartinDK
2249:MartinDK
2229:contribs
2217:unsigned
1953:Fan-1967
1833:Moreschi
1815:Fan-1967
1802:User:Zoe
1751:User:Zoe
1683:Fan-1967
1649:Overturn
1595:User:Zoe
1284:nebulous
1278:What is
1228:Comment.
1132:Comment.
1063:Comment.
1037:Comment.
1025:User:Zoe
848:Overturn
827:Overturn
618:contribs
606:unsigned
532:Overturn
488:Overturn
460:Overturn
263:Fan-1967
230:Fan-1967
194:Fan-1967
177:contribs
165:unsigned
20: |
2571:Amarkov
2548:Amarkov
2506:Amarkov
2464:Amarkov
2405:kantari
2267:Comment
2245:WP:AUTO
2153:restore
2124:protect
2119:history
2078:protect
2073:history
1782:Amarkov
1740:nothing
1675:Comment
1626:Comment
1616:kantari
1534:restore
1505:protect
1500:history
1394:Amarkov
1390:WP:PROD
1364:WP:CITE
1310:tactful
1097:kantari
996:restore
967:protect
962:history
884:Amarkov
865:Comment
783:topics
765:restore
736:protect
731:history
599:WP:NPOV
545:GRBerry
534:As per
396:restore
367:protect
362:history
276:Amarkov
243:Amarkov
206:Amarkov
145:restore
116:protect
111:history
2442:WP:COI
2424:Bwithh
2376:(talk)
2368:WP:COI
2328:Bwithh
2241:WP:COI
2128:delete
2082:delete
1864:Dakota
1806:(talk)
1798:WP:CSD
1778:WP:CSD
1755:(talk)
1743:would
1599:(talk)
1577:&
1556:page.
1509:delete
1325:WP:NOR
1276:EVula:
1258:WP:AFD
1029:(talk)
971:delete
740:delete
626:WP:IAR
567:Calton
540:WP:IAR
492:WP:IAR
464:WP:IAR
452:Bwithh
448:WP:IAR
435:Nikola
430:WP:IAR
371:delete
120:delete
2654:Help!
2576:edits
2553:edits
2511:edits
2469:edits
2401:Nacon
2145:views
2137:watch
2133:links
2099:views
2091:watch
2087:links
1787:edits
1716:Barno
1612:Nacon
1526:views
1518:watch
1514:links
1414:EVula
1399:edits
1376:mikka
1180:EVula
1145:EVula
1111:EVula
1093:Nacon
988:views
980:watch
976:links
889:edits
806:EVula
757:views
749:watch
745:links
648:EVula
634:mikka
595:WP:OR
388:views
380:watch
376:links
281:edits
248:edits
211:edits
137:views
129:watch
125:links
52:: -->
16:<
2632:talk
2532:talk
2494:talk
2352:talk
2243:and
2225:talk
2141:logs
2115:talk
2111:edit
2095:logs
2069:talk
2065:edit
1905:talk
1768:talk
1746:ever
1729:talk
1696:talk
1657:talk
1581:. --
1554:Talk
1522:logs
1496:talk
1492:edit
1419:talk
1243:prod
1185:talk
1150:talk
1116:talk
984:logs
958:talk
954:edit
856:talk
811:talk
753:logs
727:talk
723:edit
653:talk
644:will
630:Duja
614:talk
597:and
581:Duja
571:Talk
563:this
500:talk
384:logs
358:talk
354:edit
173:talk
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
32:<
2648:Guy
2606:bli
2159:AfD
1979:bli
1889:bli
1575:Zoe
1540:AfD
1421://
1417://
1346:Mal
1341:not
1187://
1183://
1168:Mal
1152://
1148://
1136:Mal
1118://
1114://
1067:Mal
1041:Mal
1012:Mal
1002:AfD
813://
809://
802:G11
771:AfD
655://
651://
402:AfD
151:AfD
72:AfD
22:Log
2634:)
2609:nd
2603:ar
2600:St
2597:-
2534:)
2496:)
2358:)
2354:•
2247:.
2231:)
2227:•
2143:|
2139:|
2135:|
2131:|
2126:|
2122:|
2117:|
2113:|
2097:|
2093:|
2089:|
2085:|
2080:|
2076:|
2071:|
2067:|
2032:,
1982:nd
1976:ar
1973:St
1970:-
1941:--
1892:nd
1886:ar
1883:St
1880:-
1843:.
1524:|
1520:|
1516:|
1512:|
1507:|
1503:|
1498:|
1494:|
1427://
1366:,
1362:,
1358:,
1316:.
1246:}}
1240:{{
1193://
1158://
1124://
986:|
982:|
978:|
974:|
969:|
965:|
960:|
956:|
819://
798:A7
755:|
751:|
747:|
743:|
738:|
734:|
729:|
725:|
661://
620:).
616:•
569:|
418:,
414:,
386:|
382:|
378:|
374:|
369:|
365:|
360:|
356:|
228:.
179:)
175:•
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
42::
2656:)
2652:(
2638:.
2630:(
2538:.
2530:(
2500:.
2492:(
2374:|
2350:(
2223:(
2162:)
2156:|
2150:(
2147:)
2109:(
2101:)
2063:(
1804:|
1753:|
1597:|
1543:)
1537:|
1531:(
1528:)
1490:(
1424:☯
1190:☯
1155:☯
1121:☯
1027:|
1005:)
999:|
993:(
990:)
952:(
816:☯
774:)
768:|
762:(
759:)
721:(
658:☯
612:(
585:►
405:)
399:|
393:(
390:)
352:(
171:(
154:)
148:|
142:(
139:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.