1691:
that nearly 4/5 of discussion participants after Feb. 15 wanted the article kept. Additionally, three of the initial "redirect" voters changed their mind and opted to have the article kept, taking into account the improvements. I believe even more of the redirect voters would also have changed their
1245:
I believe that
Bleedman does meet notability, as the highest-viewed and arguably most profound DeviantArt artist. He is extremely well-known by digital artists, especially within the webcomic community, and the author of several full-length comic works. He also returns over 47,000 hits on google. In
834:
Out of
Process, POV Pushing First AfD tainted by OP and out of process. 2nd AfD opened and closed by Jeffrey O. Gustafson with significant POV pushing on his part (my observation). Opened ANI on Jeffrey O. Gustafson and told by admins to open DRV. Please look into this closey. Let me know if you
1051:
I don't feel this is a sustainable approach to calculation of AfD time. If the slate had been wiped on the 4th day at the 23rd hour, the clock for the next AfD could not be reasonably construed to end after an hour. It is most proper for each AfD to enjoy its allotted time, especially if there is
1842:. The deleted article was a well-written, full article, which is significantly larger than the small piece in the Wii Channels list. Even if it was never going to be expanded again it was suffient for its own page. Needless to say, there was plenty of space for it to be expanded in any case.
1437:
I fail to see where he is not notable since he (a)is a "professionals whose work is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field", (b) "has been the subject of several published non-trivial works" and reviews (posted
528:
deletion review is not here because you merely disagree with the deletion. The delete arguments point to the lack of verifiability, the book for which the publisher couldn't be verified to exist and the ISBN invalid etc. These are the things which you need to overcome before such an article can
171:(which content also attempts to establish notability.) But please observe — this opportunity to establish notability was not invited prior to instruction to pursue deletion review. (This is my first visit to Deletion Review, i hope this is proper procedure...)
295:
It is certainly true that her name has been misspelled. But through writing the article, I have determined a correct spelling, implementation of which is on hold during this DR process. As for "only claim to notability," may I observe that
Googling
724:– Relisted with consent of deleting admin, original closure quote follows: "The extant AfD has been relisted and I made it clear that the closing admin must go by the timestamp I just made, not the original, nor the original-original. --
1682:
This article was nominated for deletion with the reason "Inadequate info for an article", as it was only 3 sentences long. The initial flurry of votes were towards redirecting the article. However, the article was expanded and improved
1412:
hits on a website does not equal an article. We need non-trivial sources in reliable publications from which an article can be sourced. Also, Bleedman himself has stated that he doesn't want an article, and that should be respected.
1032:, because the second nomination amounted to a relisting (the total time elapsed for both AFDs was five days), and there was a near-unanimous consensus to delete in it, disregarding open proxies in the first AFD. --
1246:
addition, Bleedman has been included in such online published review works as ComicAlert and
DigitalStrips. The deleted article was, in my opinion well-written (despite being a stub). Request undeletion. ~
558:
NN teacher article with strong overtones of both libellous attack page and downright nonsense. Okay, kids, we get it, you hate your teacher. Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to advertise that fact.
327:
207:
Per the statement from the bottom, looks valid as an A7 now. It also looks like the article in the userspace asserts better, so I'd imagine we can simply move that in at the conclusion. --
937:
do you need to open this review before the closing admin even had a chance to respond? This is most likely a clerical errors and can be resolved without the need of a policy debate. ~
819:
1688:
1673:
895:
the second AFD to allow it to run for the full period. I see no reason to discount the comments made so far in that thread, though. That discussion may be continued.
48:
34:
489:
1773:. "The Everybody Votes Channel was launched on February 13, 2007" - that's, what, a week ago? Right now it's merged to a list, that looks absolutely fine to me.
239:
is the page I deleted, though I suppose that comes off more as a confession that the article is better now than as a terribly strong argument to keep it deleted.
43:
825:
1638:
1633:
1236:
297:
1642:
167:
Deleted immediately after creation, no opportunity to establish notability, opportunity for discussion/feedback has been minimal. Discussion is here:
1364:
191:
and I don't think that merits an A7. I admit, it looks borderline depending on how you come from it, but we shouldn't be speedying borderline cases.
1667:
1625:
1495:
1450:
1387:
1323:
1258:
610:, so it doesn't matter that several people want it back; it was deleted for lack of verifiability, which you have provided no evidence of. -
39:
158:
1735:
as the closing admin, I didn't take the improvements into account either. I have no problem with another admin restoring the article. --
1589:– redirect unprotected; undoing the merge, adjusting it, or leaving it be is an editorial decision for the two article's talk pages –
1921:
Seeing as there was no actual deleted content here, and as I was the closing admin, I've gone ahead and unprotected the redirect. --
730:
454:
449:
123:
118:
458:
127:
74:– Original deletion endorsed; rewritten article now in place, moved from userspace. Renamed to Anna LiPizzo, as appropriate. –
21:
1538:, triviality of provided sources above is questionable. Hits on Google or deviantART do not necessarily equal notability, as
784:
779:
735:
483:
441:
231:
requested an opportunity to flesh out the notability of the article subject, I put the deleted content into user space here:
152:
110:
788:
1692:
mind had they taken another look at the article after it was improved. All this considered, I say the decision should be
1629:
1526:
Notability is borderline. The fact that the person in question doesn't want an article pushes it past that borderline.
1201:
1196:
1945:
1604:
1564:
1167:
1127:
750:
699:
420:
376:
182:
89:
17:
1687:
during the course of the discussion, to the point that it was a decent and well-referenced non-stub. You'll notice in
1205:
813:
771:
232:
1341:
Oh good. So how about some MORE of the references, this time non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources?
971:
The AFD was transcluded on two dates; the 11th when the first try started and the 13th when the relisting occurred.
1372:
1308:
663:'s comment, I think it's likely that this article will be recreated, and it's also likely that it still will fail
1903:, can we just unprotect the redirect and close this? This is a content issue, not a deletion on e at this point.
1489:
1444:
1381:
1317:
1252:
1230:
1188:
334:
I won't tag it, but I think you're right about their similarity, and I question
Allison Krause's notability too.
1483:
Keep in mind the fact that someone doesn't want a
Knowledge (XXG) article is not enough reason to remove it. ~
1076:: Yes, I did speedy keep the first AfD. But if that was out-of-process, the instant action is just as much so :x
309:
I'm not sure if precedent carries any weight in this decision process. If so, for comparison I'd like to offer:
849:
725:
1799:
882:
515:
212:
198:
1465:
per lack of reliable sources with non-trivial mentions. Especially against a wish not to have an article, we
1621:
1585:
1086:
1062:
1013:
259:
1932:
1916:
1889:
1868:
1846:
1834:
1803:
1786:
1763:
1746:
1726:
1700:
1593:
1553:
1530:
1514:
1500:
1478:
1455:
1432:
1392:
1354:
1328:
1283:
1263:
1156:
1112:
1043:
989:
975:
966:
941:
923:
904:
886:
869:
839:
738:
688:
651:
619:
598:
577:
550:
533:
519:
502:
409:
365:
345:
317:
304:
286:
250:
216:
202:
175:
78:
1795:
878:
511:
208:
194:
1297:
445:
114:
1484:
1439:
1376:
1312:
1247:
938:
775:
1926:
1912:
1908:
1757:
1740:
1547:
1277:
1192:
1106:
1037:
960:
920:
863:
836:
437:
397:
1082:
1058:
1009:
678:
628:
403:
341:
314:
301:
263:
246:
228:
172:
168:
1505:
No, it isn't, but it is a reason to demand reliable sources even more than we otherwise might. -
1301:
767:
720:
1885:
1722:
1510:
1474:
900:
615:
546:
947:
331:
1539:
664:
607:
224:
1363:
How are these trivial? It is just because you've never seen them before? But sure, Okay.
1923:
1904:
1816:
1754:
1737:
1697:
1544:
1414:
1274:
1103:
1034:
955:
858:
853:
660:
559:
310:
189:. Her death was noted as a precursor to a number of events surrounding the situation,
498:
several of us want it back; I came too late to second existing don't delete campaign--
1863:
1857:
1781:
1775:
1408:
valid AfD. It's not about popularity at all, and it's well-established that getting
1349:
1343:
986:
670:
593:
587:
530:
336:
323:
241:
106:
70:
1881:
1843:
1812:
1718:
1590:
1506:
1470:
972:
896:
611:
542:
1659:
1222:
805:
475:
144:
1527:
1794:. Probably should have been relisted in the first place given the changes. --
1153:
75:
667:, so it's probably best to just salt now and avoid another defaming article.
499:
541:. No evidence has been presented to justify revisiting the AFD decision.
510:
I have moved this from the incorrect day. No opinion from me as of yet. --
1293:
1184:
1148:
361:
300:(in quotes) gives 263 hits which appear to refer to the same individual.
262:; her only claim to notability is that her name is sometimes misspelled.
1752:
Struck out my argument to reconsider later. I need to re-review this. --
1855:
What, from reliable secondary sources? Or from original research?
1289:
1001:
from the beginning. This needs to be done over by clean hands.
891:
Unless
Coredesat has a credible reason for the early close,
1368:
223:(edit conflict) The article was tagged as speediable under
1369:
Snafu - which houses his THREE full-length published works
946:
Actually
Coredesat invited seems to have suggested DRV at
1052:
even a perception of impropriety, whether founded or not.
1877:
1710:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1218:
1214:
1210:
951:
801:
797:
793:
471:
467:
463:
236:
140:
136:
132:
877:. AfD closed after 3 days, should have been five. --
985:
3 days is too early to close a contentious AfD. --
326:and had an eyebrow raised on your argument.) For a
1717:to the article most of the !votes were based on. -
835:would like me to post diffs or quotes. Thanks.
1371:, and, simply because it should be said again,
359:if the article is improved, as it seems to be.
1542:does not have a criterion for website hits. --
1298:The Bleedman 9-11 controversy at DigitalStrips
8:
1311:. These are just SOME of the references. ~
1603:The following is an archived debate of the
1302:A review and an interview with Bleedman at
1166:The following is an archived debate of the
749:The following is an archived debate of the
419:The following is an archived debate of the
88:The following is an archived debate of the
1696:ed and the article should be undeleted. --
1578:
1141:
713:
390:
63:
169:User_talk:JDoorjam#Anna_Lo_Pezza_deletion
1944:The above is an archived debate of the
1563:The above is an archived debate of the
1126:The above is an archived debate of the
915:Does that include the comments made in
698:The above is an archived debate of the
375:The above is an archived debate of the
185:. By that text, I think it's a clear
1815:looks like the perfect place for it.
7:
848:. The second AfD was not closed by
627:, no reason given for undeletion.
28:
1272:Can you provide those sources? --
322:(Before clicking the link I was
233:User:Richard Myers/Anna Lo Pezza
227:, and I deleted it as such. As
997:as severely out-of-process and
893:overturn the closure and reopen
585:and speedy close. No chance.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1373:47,000 relevant hits on google
1309:47,000 relevant hits on google
401:– Deletion endorsed, salted –
1:
1933:03:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1917:01:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1890:01:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1869:23:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1847:18:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1835:15:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1804:15:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1787:09:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1764:15:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1747:05:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1727:04:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1701:04:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1594:04:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1554:03:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1531:00:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1515:16:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1501:16:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1479:16:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1456:16:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1433:16:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1393:16:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1355:09:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1329:07:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1284:07:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1264:06:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1157:19:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
1113:23:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1044:23:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
990:22:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
976:22:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
967:22:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
942:22:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
924:23:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
905:21:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
887:20:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
870:20:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
840:19:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
739:00:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
689:21:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
657:Endorse and preemptively salt
652:14:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
620:01:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
599:23:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
578:21:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
551:21:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
534:21:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
520:20:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
503:20:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
410:08:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
366:00:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
346:00:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
318:22:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
305:20:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
287:14:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
251:00:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
217:03:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
203:00:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
176:23:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
79:19:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
1809:Endorse current merged state
1026:Yes, I did suggest the DRV.
1971:
1294:Short entry at ComicAlert
1951:Please do not modify it.
1610:Please do not modify it.
1570:Please do not modify it.
1365:Bleedman at ChoiceComics
1173:Please do not modify it.
1133:Please do not modify it.
756:Please do not modify it.
705:Please do not modify it.
426:Please do not modify it.
382:Please do not modify it.
95:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
1689:the deletion discussion
1622:Everybody Votes Channel
1586:Everybody Votes Channel
604:Strong endorse deletion
260:Lawrence textile strike
1948:of the article above.
1607:of the article above.
1567:of the article above.
1170:of the article above.
1152:– Deletion endorsed –
1130:of the article above.
753:of the article above.
702:of the article above.
423:of the article above.
379:of the article above.
92:of the article above.
1878:From reliable sources
1290:Bleedman's DeviantArt
1030:endorsing my deletion
1028:However, I am still
850:Jeffrey O. Gustafson
726:Jeffrey O. Gustafson
324:thinking of this one
1099:overturn and relist
995:Overturn and relist
983:Overturn and relist
875:Overturn and relist
852:, it was closed by
1304:Creme DeLa Deviant
229:User:Richard Myers
1958:
1957:
1888:
1867:
1802:
1785:
1725:
1577:
1576:
1513:
1477:
1353:
1140:
1139:
1097:Very well, then,
1092:
1091:2007-02-19 23:39Z
1068:
1067:2007-02-19 23:35Z
1019:
1018:2007-02-19 23:28Z
903:
885:
712:
711:
618:
597:
549:
522:
518:
389:
388:
344:
249:
215:
201:
1962:
1953:
1929:
1884:
1861:
1832:
1829:
1826:
1823:
1798:
1779:
1760:
1743:
1721:
1663:
1645:
1612:
1579:
1572:
1550:
1536:Endorse deletion
1524:Endorse deletion
1509:
1498:
1492:
1487:
1473:
1463:Endorse deletion
1453:
1447:
1442:
1430:
1427:
1424:
1421:
1406:Endorse deletion
1390:
1384:
1379:
1347:
1326:
1320:
1315:
1280:
1261:
1255:
1250:
1226:
1208:
1175:
1142:
1135:
1109:
1094:
1090:
1070:
1066:
1040:
1021:
1017:
965:
899:
881:
868:
809:
791:
758:
714:
707:
685:
681:
677:
674:
648:
646:
644:
642:
640:
614:
591:
575:
572:
569:
566:
545:
526:Endorse deletion
514:
509:
479:
461:
428:
406:
391:
384:
340:
283:
281:
279:
277:
275:
245:
211:
197:
181:The content was
148:
130:
97:
64:
59:19 February 2007
53:
49:2007 February 20
35:2007 February 18
33:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1949:
1946:deletion review
1927:
1830:
1827:
1824:
1821:
1758:
1741:
1678:
1672:
1666:
1636:
1620:
1608:
1605:deletion review
1568:
1565:deletion review
1548:
1496:
1490:
1485:
1451:
1445:
1440:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1419:
1388:
1382:
1377:
1324:
1318:
1313:
1278:
1259:
1253:
1248:
1241:
1235:
1229:
1199:
1183:
1171:
1168:deletion review
1131:
1128:deletion review
1107:
1079:
1055:
1038:
1006:
954:
939:trialsanderrors
921:Captain Barrett
857:
837:Captain Barrett
830:
824:
818:
812:
782:
766:
754:
751:deletion review
703:
700:deletion review
683:
679:
672:
668:
638:
636:
634:
632:
630:
608:not a democracy
573:
570:
567:
564:
539:Endorse closure
494:
488:
482:
452:
436:
424:
421:deletion review
404:
380:
377:deletion review
273:
271:
269:
267:
265:
163:
157:
151:
121:
105:
93:
90:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1968:
1966:
1956:
1955:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1872:
1871:
1850:
1849:
1837:
1817:Andrew Lenahan
1806:
1796:badlydrawnjeff
1789:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1729:
1680:
1679:
1676:
1670:
1664:
1615:
1614:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1575:
1574:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1533:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1415:Andrew Lenahan
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1358:
1357:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1243:
1242:
1239:
1233:
1227:
1178:
1177:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1138:
1137:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1077:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1023:
1022:
1003:
1002:
992:
980:
979:
978:
969:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
908:
907:
889:
879:badlydrawnjeff
872:
832:
831:
828:
822:
820:AfD, first try
816:
810:
761:
760:
745:
744:
743:
742:
710:
709:
694:
693:
692:
691:
661:Andrew Lenahan
659:. Considering
654:
622:
601:
580:
560:Andrew Lenahan
556:Strong endorse
553:
536:
523:
512:badlydrawnjeff
496:
495:
492:
486:
480:
431:
430:
415:
414:
413:
412:
387:
386:
371:
370:
369:
368:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
311:Allison_Krause
307:
298:"Anna LoPizzo"
290:
289:
253:
221:
220:
219:
209:badlydrawnjeff
195:badlydrawnjeff
165:
164:
161:
155:
149:
100:
99:
84:
83:
82:
81:
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1967:
1954:
1952:
1947:
1942:
1941:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1925:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1899:
1898:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1870:
1865:
1860:
1859:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1848:
1845:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1833:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1783:
1778:
1777:
1772:
1771:Endorse close
1769:
1765:
1762:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1739:
1734:
1730:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1699:
1695:
1690:
1686:
1675:
1669:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1644:
1640:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1606:
1601:
1600:
1595:
1592:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1573:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1560:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1525:
1522:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1499:
1493:
1491:DrillSergeant
1488:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1461:
1457:
1454:
1448:
1446:DrillSergeant
1443:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1431:
1416:
1411:
1407:
1404:
1403:
1394:
1391:
1385:
1383:DrillSergeant
1380:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1345:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1330:
1327:
1321:
1319:DrillSergeant
1316:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1262:
1256:
1254:DrillSergeant
1251:
1238:
1232:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1207:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1136:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1123:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1093:
1088:
1084:
1083:Adrian~enwiki
1078:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1069:
1064:
1060:
1059:Adrian~enwiki
1054:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1015:
1011:
1010:Adrian~enwiki
1005:
1004:
1000:
999:sine cathedra
996:
993:
991:
988:
984:
981:
977:
974:
970:
968:
964:
963:
959:
958:
952:
949:
945:
944:
943:
940:
936:
933:
932:
925:
922:
918:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
888:
884:
880:
876:
873:
871:
867:
866:
862:
861:
855:
851:
847:
844:
843:
842:
841:
838:
827:
821:
815:
807:
803:
799:
795:
790:
786:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
764:
763:
762:
759:
757:
752:
747:
746:
740:
737:
733:
732:
727:
723:
722:
718:
717:
716:
715:
708:
706:
701:
696:
695:
690:
686:
676:
666:
662:
658:
655:
653:
650:
649:
626:
623:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
602:
600:
595:
590:
589:
584:
581:
579:
576:
561:
557:
554:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
535:
532:
527:
524:
521:
517:
513:
508:
507:
506:
504:
501:
491:
485:
477:
473:
469:
465:
460:
456:
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:Adrian Berger
435:
434:
433:
432:
429:
427:
422:
417:
416:
411:
408:
407:
405:Daniel.Bryant
400:
399:
398:Adrian Berger
395:
394:
393:
392:
385:
383:
378:
373:
372:
367:
364:
363:
358:
355:
354:
347:
343:
339:
338:
333:
329:
325:
321:
320:
319:
316:
315:Richard Myers
312:
308:
306:
303:
302:Richard Myers
299:
294:
293:
292:
291:
288:
285:
284:
261:
257:
254:
252:
248:
244:
243:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
174:
173:Richard Myers
170:
160:
154:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:Anna Lo Pezza
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
96:
91:
86:
85:
80:
77:
73:
72:
71:Anna Lo Pezza
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
44:2007 February
41:
36:
23:
19:
1950:
1943:
1922:
1900:
1856:
1839:
1820:
1813:Wii Channels
1808:
1791:
1774:
1770:
1753:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1714:
1706:
1693:
1684:
1681:
1609:
1602:
1584:
1569:
1562:
1543:
1535:
1523:
1466:
1462:
1418:
1409:
1405:
1342:
1303:
1288:Yes, I can:
1273:
1269:
1244:
1172:
1165:
1147:
1132:
1125:
1102:
1098:
1080:
1073:
1056:
1033:
1029:
1027:
1007:
998:
994:
982:
961:
956:
934:
916:
892:
874:
864:
859:
845:
833:
755:
748:
729:
719:
704:
697:
656:
629:
624:
603:
586:
582:
563:
555:
538:
525:
497:
425:
418:
402:
396:
381:
374:
360:
356:
335:
264:
255:
240:
190:
186:
166:
94:
87:
69:
58:
1685:drastically
1438:above). ~
935:Why why why
1074:Disclaimer
768:Ebony Anpu
736:<*: -->
721:Ebony Anpu
342:JDiscourse
313:. thanks,
247:JDiscourse
1905:Night Gyr
1698:TheCoffee
854:Coredesat
529:exist. --
235:. FWIW,
1840:Overturn
1733:Overturn
1707:Overturn
1694:overturn
1469:those. -
1185:Bleedman
1149:Bleedman
987:Oakshade
731:Shazaam!
606:. We're
505:(sasha)
357:undelete
337:JDoorjam
256:Redirect
242:JDoorjam
187:overturn
183:userfied
20: |
1901:Comment
1882:Amarkov
1719:Amarkov
1713:is not
1668:restore
1639:protect
1634:history
1591:GRBerry
1507:Amarkov
1471:Amarkov
1270:Comment
1231:restore
1202:protect
1197:history
973:GRBerry
948:WP:AN/I
919:AfD's?
897:Rossami
814:restore
785:protect
780:history
625:Endorse
612:Amarkov
583:Endorse
543:Rossami
484:restore
455:protect
450:history
332:reasons
153:restore
124:protect
119:history
1811:since
1792:Relist
1643:delete
1540:WP:BIO
1528:JuJube
1307:, and
1206:delete
962:scribe
950:, see
901:(talk)
865:scribe
789:delete
665:WP:BIO
547:(talk)
459:delete
328:couple
225:CSD A7
128:delete
1928:desat
1864:Help!
1782:Help!
1759:desat
1742:desat
1715:close
1660:views
1652:watch
1648:links
1549:desat
1375:. ~
1350:Help!
1279:desat
1223:views
1215:watch
1211:links
1154:Xoloz
1108:desat
1039:desat
806:views
798:watch
794:links
631:: -->
594:Help!
476:views
468:watch
464:links
266:: -->
145:views
137:watch
133:links
76:Xoloz
52:: -->
16:<
1924:Core
1909:talk
1886:moo!
1800:talk
1755:Core
1738:Core
1723:moo!
1711:This
1656:logs
1630:talk
1626:edit
1545:Core
1511:moo!
1475:moo!
1467:need
1275:Core
1219:logs
1193:talk
1189:edit
1104:Core
1101:. --
1087:talk
1063:talk
1035:Core
1014:talk
917:Both
883:talk
846:Note
802:logs
776:talk
772:edit
675:acan
647:<
616:moo!
516:talk
500:Svm2
472:logs
446:talk
442:edit
282:<
237:this
213:talk
199:talk
141:logs
115:talk
111:edit
32:<
1880:. -
1858:Guy
1844:Tim
1828:bli
1776:Guy
1674:AfD
1494:...
1449:...
1426:bli
1386:...
1344:Guy
1322:...
1257:...
1237:AfD
957:WjB
860:WjB
826:AfD
671:coe
588:Guy
571:bli
531:pgk
490:AfD
362:DGG
330:of
258:to
159:AfD
22:Log
1915:)
1913:Oy
1831:nd
1825:ar
1822:St
1819:-
1709:.
1658:|
1654:|
1650:|
1646:|
1641:|
1637:|
1632:|
1628:|
1486:PH
1441:PH
1429:nd
1423:ar
1420:St
1417:-
1378:PH
1367:,
1314:PH
1300:,
1296:,
1292:,
1249:PH
1221:|
1217:|
1213:|
1209:|
1204:|
1200:|
1195:|
1191:|
1089:)
1065:)
1016:)
953:.
856:.
804:|
800:|
796:|
792:|
787:|
783:|
778:|
774:|
734:-
728:-
687:—
684:lk
669:—
574:nd
568:ar
565:St
562:-
474:|
470:|
466:|
462:|
457:|
453:|
448:|
444:|
193:--
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
42::
1911:/
1907:(
1866:)
1862:(
1784:)
1780:(
1677:)
1671:|
1665:(
1662:)
1624:(
1497:§
1452:§
1410:x
1389:§
1352:)
1348:(
1325:§
1260:§
1240:)
1234:|
1228:(
1225:)
1187:(
1085:(
1081:—
1061:(
1057:—
1012:(
1008:—
829:)
823:|
817:|
811:(
808:)
770:(
741:"
682:a
680:t
673:l
645:t
643:n
641:a
639:i
637:d
635:a
633:R
596:)
592:(
493:)
487:|
481:(
478:)
440:(
280:t
278:n
276:a
274:i
272:d
270:a
268:R
162:)
156:|
150:(
147:)
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.