1093:" "In the works is a fresh new revision of The Apostles’ Bible " and also he has made a previous translation, "by Author House, and are very popular, mostly by word of mouth." Normally, a Bible translator would be notable, as they are generally distinguished scholars, with extensive other published work & academic and church positions of great prominence, and so on. He is however "mostly self-taught".
2660:. This article is considered 'top' importance by a well established wikiproject for articles on a notable topic. It is discussed in every encyclopedia I have access to. Deleting it would be crazy, and there was no realistic chance of deletion occurring, so closing it early does no harm. If you feel the subject needs discussion, may I suggest the talk page of
746:(in german and spanish only) I wrote big part of the Article about Bicing in German , which later on was merged with other similar schemes like Vienna, Lyon and Stuttgart (call a bike). My german wikiarticle contains quite a lot of even english sources to fulfill the 3rd party source demand mentioned by DGG user stefanbcn for german and spanish version
216:. Any plausible claim of notability should be enough to undo a speedy. Though if the article has only the one single citation, I'm not sure I would vote to keep it at AfD, given the apparent complexity of the concept and the claimed brevity of the article. No objection to keeping a larger and better-referenced article on this topic, though.
1436:
article. Also, I wasn't too sure about comment's such as Grue's 'what is the point of undeleting now only to recreate later' - since the point for discussion was whether the article as it stood was suitable for inclusion. Anyhoo, is there a process for me simply to undelete and change the summary (or for another admin to do) immediately?
2377:. The constant challenges towards everybody who argued "keep" made the entire AFD utterly and unquestionably disruptive. Consensus was ridiculously clear. No point in running this process just for running the process. Nomination was utterly ill-informed since he started citing "ILIKEIT" before any arguments had been presented.
1683:. The constant challenges towards everybody who argued "keep" made the entire AFD utterly and unquestionably disruptive. Consensus was ridiculously clear. No point in running this process just for running the process. Nomination was utterly ill-informed since he started citing "ILIKEIT" before any arguments had been presented.
2055:, even though it will end either in "keep" or "keep and rewrite to be cited history of chess strategy, not description/guide of current strategy". People tend toward speedy Keeps, Deletes, and DRV Endorses more than our policies and guidelines call for. Let things run their five days unless there's a problem covered by
1804:
underused because everyone wants to keep everything on wikipedia. As I also pointed out even some people who thought it should be kept agreed that it did violate the policy but though chess was notable enough not to delete it. Yet there is no allowance for that in the policy, hence why we had an AfD.--
1843:
Were this kind of detail part of the main article, I'd recommend its removal from the article. I think there is room for historical discussion and recording of chess strategy as well as discussion about modern trends, without going in to the minutia of the various strategies and how they work and how
608:
I wanted to create this article and I have seen that it has been speedy-deleted twice because of being a non-notable company. Obviously I do not know the quality of those two deleted articles but I do not think they deserve to be speedy-deleted. Bicing is not a company but a service of
Barcelona City
3078:
Unicode font is notable, then this one. It is cited in pretty much every document explaining how to work with
Unicode. The deletion comments seem to think that a review of its (graphical) design quality by mainstream media is necessary to establish notability for a font. That is obviously a fallacy,
2391:
AfD is not a vote, its a debate. I cited "ILIKEIT" (and rightfully so as you can see from some of the responses) simply to nip in the bud. I all to often see those reasons as a response to AfDs. Many people will choose to completely ignore the reason for deletion and say "its a well written article,
3041:
I'm persuaded by the comments that Code2000 is valued by many contributors and they were just not aware of the AfD. It is not always easy to weigh usage within
Knowledge against general usage. However this page is clearly not spam or one-sided promotion, and we have article-writing editors who use
1803:
I'm not trying to change policy, but apply existing policy to existing articles. There are way too many articles on wikipedia to consider the existence of articles (even long term) precedent for keeping them unless they've survived an AfD. We have a family of wiki sites here, some of which go very
1435:
self per
Douglas Adams ('most of it seemed to make some kind of sense at the time') - reading through it again, I completely agree with you. The first time round, as I explained in the summary, I saw a large number of new users and IPs who, it seemed, had simply shown up to say 'I like it' to this
2589:
This is an important article - even if not cited, there are probably dozens (hundreds?) of reliable sources for chess tactics (a quick search for books on the subject at amazon.com show 400+ hits and the first few pages all seem relevant) - if not for some size limitations - an encyclopedia would
762:
stefanbcn PS quote:I don't see any potential for expansion in articles about a service which is one month (or a few months) old, yes there is quite a lot of potential, as this is social phenomen as well, with 80.000 having paid so far within a short time the yearly fee, the german article as well
1857:
It's not a "guide to strategy", though. Admittedly, a full article about chess strategy would stretch to thousands of pages, but this merely an overview of the subject. I'll admit it could be written better (and I'm quite happy to look at that one myself), but it certainly isn't a how-to or an
2104:
is clearly the correct result, it becomes disruptive to snowball close AfDs really early and have them drug to DRV for a retrial. This happens too much. Out-of-process closures inflame heated debates, they drag the process out rather than simplify it, they disenfranchise good-faith (if often
2544:
I don't like snow closures because the tide of a discussion can always change, and I don't really think it was a speedy candidate. Just in general, I think it's preferable to let discussions run their course, unless it's clearly a bad faith nomination. On the other hand, I think this was an
2017:
This is an important article - even if not cited, there are probably dozens (hundreds? thousands?) of reliable sources for chess strategy (a quick search for books on the subject at amazon.com show 2000+ hits and the first few pages all seem relevant) - if not for some size limitations - an
3344:
They'd be primary sources and not really the best stuff to cite in an encyclopedia article, I believe. They'd best be cited just to reliably cover what the forms say, if such a thing is relevant to the article. In general we should summarize secondary sources, not primary ones.
197:). User Jaranda deleted it instantly, Any attempt to contact the user failed. I think it is the matter of wikipedia that articles are growing over time. They cannot be immediately complete on their first revision. Still the article was informative enough to explain the term.
2639:
Or are we limited to "history of
Diplomacy strategy", "history of Scrabble tactics", and the like? The speedy-closed discussion might have led to some clarification. I couldn't ask because the AfD was open and closed in thirteen hours while I was away for forty-eight.
2105:
misguided) users. These out-of-process closures are fundamentally bad for the project, because they increase
Wikidrama. If it is the right decision, it will still be the right decision on Thursday. It's just not worth it to unilaterally halt the discussion process. --
1844:
good each one is (you'll note the opinion about the quality of some of the strategies there), etc. There is a difference between a guide to strategy and an encyclopedic article about chess strategy. I don't really think this is anywhere near a encyclopedic article.--
2075:(one way or the other). It does no good, and it (reasonably enough) annoys those who have argued the other way and feel they are being ignored. What's done is done, and the article should be allowed to stand as common sense, but this was an unnecessary close.
2176:
is clearly applicable here: there was no realistic chance of article deletion, while continuing the AFD was of no benefit, and was causing some rather heated conflicts. Closure was in the interests of the encyclopedia, whereas opening a review wasn't.
1216:. Books published by vanity presses and their authors never seem to survive at AfD. There appears to be an overwhelming consensus to delete such articles; as such, A7 as it was applied here would not seem unreasonable. No opinion from me, FWIW.
240:
The only content was the "In psychology, the effect of an individual preserving his/her attitude even when he/she is presented with facts that contradict it" a link, and some tags, which I deleted as A1, I undeleted it but I recommend AFD. Thanks
2422:
although I wouldn't have closed early, that's where it was obviously heading. Article should be better referenced though, to make it clear it is summarizing published information about the topic, rather than providing original opinions on it.
1765:
That was one of the options being discussed in the AFD. When there are objections to a keep brought up, especially on policy grounds, the best thing to do is to let the discussion ensue, instead of a hasty speedy close per "common sense".
1697:
Its a debate, not a vote. In fact even one of the people arguing keep admitted that it violated the policy but felt it was notable enough to be kept (which the policy makes no allowance for) That alone should indicate there is need for debate
1393:
Wow, I'm speechless. Not only there was no consensus to delete on AfD, but the reasoning for the closure is just ridiculous. I quote, "there is insufficient coverage in reliable independent sources to merit inclusion". Yeah, right. Apparently
1983:
This isn't a discussion though. Chess strategy certainly is immense and has changed over the years, but this article doesn't contain any of that. it simply teaches the user about current popular strategies and things to think about during a
2515:, it gives the example of saying that some band out of thousands and thousands should have an article because one editor likes the band a lot. That certainly is not the reason people are saying that these chess articles should be kept.
3042:
it. I realize that the page itself, at least the one I can see at answers.com, looks a bit junky, and I assume that those who are voting to
Overturn here are prepared to lend some assistance in improving the article if it is restored.
3307:: the original article was a sub-stub with most of its information (or lack thereof) culled from the company's mission statement from its official website. There is really nothing to salvage so one may as well start from scratch; per
2982:. The fact that it is easily downloadable for free as shareware only adds to its ubiquity and importance. It is an important font for mathematics because of its inclusion of special characters and symbols used in mathematical writing
2955:- Code2000 (along with Code2001 and Code2002) is a highly notable font and is certainly deserving of an article. A quick look at a few of the links found in the Google search provided above should be enough to establish notability,
2569:
a reasonable close. A reprint of the rules is not encyclopedic; an introductory discussion of them is, as for any other sport. Brittanica and all other print encyclopedias have content just like this, for this and other games.
2988:. However its importance goes far beyond mathematics. Its multilingual coverage makes it particularly important for untold numbers of writers, readers and scholars of many ancient and obscure or under covered modern languages
3091:— a rather brief AfD, closed after five days. Now, votes to overturn equal those for deletion. It looks like there's sufficient notability for this — I use this font regularly, as I often work with wide Unicode ranges — and
3334:
Question: Wouldn't regulatory forms filed with the SEC by a public company be considered a reliable source? I believe SEC forms such as 10-K and 8-K are filed under criminal penalties for false statements or ommissions.
2934:- I am uninformed on this topic but just because Knowledge uses a font doesn't mean it's notable. If you can find a reliable source that establishes its notability, though, then by all means it deserves an article.
667:
Straightforward descriptive article, but needs 3rd party sources. Perhaps there is enough on these individual programs to stand on their own--they usually have newspaper coverage. A merge can be discussed after its
2348:
I was one of the users who argued for delete, and pretty much every arguement for keep/delete were being discussed and the speedy close essentially cut off all discussion. This nomination had a strong case per
1654:
I was one of the users who argued for delete, and pretty much every arguement for keep/delete were being discussed and the speedy close essentially cut off all discussion. This nomination had a strong case per
2618:
except not much in this section's debate was new rather than just repeating from above. The basic question under discussion should be worked out clearly. One reason is to provide guidelines and precedent for
969:. It is important to know who and what is author of Bible translation. The article does not fit condition for speedy deletion at all. This person is widely known in Christian and widely searchable by Google.
1155:
Translating a bible is effectively, but not transparently, an assertion of notability. That said, as far as I can tell, this translation itself lacks any notability yet, so deletion appears to be correct.
1117:
for seven years to perform translation. You need to give scholar witness that his work is nothing but re-publishing. Person can reduces his own work to be shy, so his own statement about his work is not
3269:
Significance, relevance, lack of discussion The article was tagged for speedy deletion, I responded promptly with a NotSoFast tag, there was no substantive discussion on the merits. There is talk on
3079:
because extremely widespread use and exceptional character coverage are also factors to take into account. And even seemingly trivial mentions can amount to notability, if there are enough of them. --
1023:
3285:
work, and revenues of over $ 300 Million. Admittedly, all of these facts were not in the original article, but I don't want to recreate the article without getting some administrative oversight.
1786:. If the editor feels that glossaries and rules should not be in wikipedia, is trying on a case by case basis to get long standing aricles deleted the correct procedure, or is it a violation of
1180:
independent and reliable sources with a non-trivial mention of the topic. We need independent reliable sources to write a policy compliant article, which is why they are the basic standard for
767:
Well, it is the first time I go in a deletion review and I did not expect such a success. Of course Bicing has had an important repercussion into
Catalan and Spanish media (16 articles in
1240:
I can not see a real claim of notability here. There are no verifiable reliable sources. Would be a complete waste of time for an Afd since it does not have independent reliable sources.
3295:
If you can cite all of that to reliable sources, just create it in your user space and move it back to the article space when it can stand on its own. There shouldn't be a problem. --
3107:. I couldn't view Knowledge successfully. Then I learned about Code2000. I installed it. Now I can read almost everything on Knowledge! This font is very valuable to the Linux user.
2631:
bans anything very close to complete description of the rules, strategy, or tactics of a game; or at least restricts it to encyclopedic summarization of what has appeared in multiple
1783:
1384:
382:
2652:
The article seems to meet CSK 2.1 (obviously frivolous nominations). Not that I've ever even heard of CSK before now, despite contributing regularly to deletion arguments.
1967:
a reasonable close. A discussion of how to play the game written as a tutorial is not encyclopedic; an introductory discussion of the immense subject of chess strategy is.
3027:- The links given do not in fact establish notability. They just contain trivial mentions of the font, and are not sources that could be used to write an article. --
3359:
I deleted the article based on content as blatant advertising, and I agree with W. marsh and Kinu - there's no problem with recreation if it is done in a NPOV way.
609:
council (and thus it is payed with my taxes) in order to have an amount of public bicycles and use them as an ecologist transport. Other cities such as Paris with
2149:
1632:
193:
I have created a psychological article stub with included short definition of a well known phenomenon in psychology. And even refrenced the scientific sources. (
2710:
2326:
368:
1127:
No, we don't need to find a "scholar witness" to *disprove* Mr. Esposito's notability. You're the proponent of the article. *You* have the burden of finding
2623:. Some people want to describe strategy and tactics at length where they're well-documented in hobby 'zine sources (see the sections for each Great Power in
2620:
2637:
should a properly cited game strategy or tactics article (or article section) be kept if it describes the strategic and tactical play like a "game guide"?
1228:
No evidence of notability. A self-published book is not enough to go on. Reviews in the mainstream press would make a difference, but I didn't find any.
48:
34:
3217:
3212:
3221:
132:
127:
2091:. No need to overturn the Keep in this case, but a contested AfD with a suggestion that policy might favor Delete shouldn't be closed early as Keep.
2874:
2557:
is still open at the moment -- if the tide of discussion changes there (which I highly doubt it will) we can always reconsider the early closure. --
1341:
1336:
136:
1402:
Cinematical lists EHWR as viral marketing for the untitled J.J. Abrams movie, and suggests that Ethan Haas will be a main character in said movie.
1345:
43:
3246:
3204:
161:
119:
1004:, which is currently proposed for deletion due to lack of sources. Is there any chance these two articles can be cited to reliable sources? --
3260:
1370:
1328:
175:
2469:
So then you'd be okay with me creating a guide to the pokemon trading card game, since its not a video game its not strictly prohibited?--
375:
2943:
Yes, X number of google web results due not mean any are reliable sources. I saw nothing non-trivial on a Google News
Archive search. --
913:
908:
1589:
1584:
1451:
917:
956:
2904:
2283:
2278:
1593:
1027:
392:
39:
1461:
Yeah, I think you can just re-close it. Thank you for being able to admit your mistake, that's a very useful quality for an admin.
1140:
No I did not. The article was deleted by you without good reason. I told you might google his name to see notability and sources.--
395:
2287:
942:
900:
2883:
The AfD lacked informed comments; the claim was lack of notability, yet the font is heavily used by
Knowledge itself, including
2594:; since we do have these limitations this seems the best way to break up a substantial body of knowledge into managable sizes.
2022:; since we do have these limitations this seems the best way to break up a substantial body of knowledge into managable sizes.
1618:
1576:
398:
2312:
2270:
2031:
This is an important topic, but there was unresolved discussion in progress about whether the article fundamentally violates
1184:, a guideline with community consensus that attempts to identify the requirements imposed by the interaction of the policies
1817:
That's not the point, though - these articles are sub-articles, split out of the main chess article. You might as well AfD
599:
343:
2039:
as instruction or as encyclopedic aid to understanding the rest of the chess articles. I don't think it was sufficiently
1197:
391:
This image was originally deleted because there were several "free" alternatives at commons. All three others images have
21:
750:
2831:
2826:
728:
351:
334:
2959:
2896:
2835:
2043:, the only policy cited, to require the speedy-keep. As pointed out above, the AfD met none of the four criteria of
1411:
iF Magazine, IGN, Film.com, Chud.com, and New York Entertainment have all reported on EHWR and Cloverfield together.
3321:
2918:
556:
551:
3208:
655:; I don't see any potential for expansion in articles about a service which is one month (or a few months) old. -
3381:
3183:
3139:
2860:
2818:
2797:
2748:
2249:
2200:
1555:
1506:
1332:
1307:
1267:
879:
830:
796:
792:
560:
522:
478:
317:
278:
257:
98:
17:
123:
3282:
3200:
3160:
2627:), or in the user-submitted-content section of game hobby websites like BoardGameGeek. Other people believe
2998:
2486:
of chess tactics, split out of the main article. No-one could learn to play chess using only this article.
1818:
652:
585:
543:
2553:
attempt to dismantle the structure of a FA, so I won't object to the early close. Also, the discussion at
115:
70:
2496:
2461:
1907:
1868:
1831:
1447:
904:
2907:
project, and we recommend it routinely as a solution for "missing character" glyphs. The deleting admin (
1001:
981:
966:
460:
3270:
3016:
2721:
2698:
2160:
2137:
1956:
402:
3346:
3296:
2944:
2424:
1293:
1005:
705:
205:
3370:
3349:
3339:
3329:
3299:
3289:
3172:
3128:
3111:
3099:
3083:
3046:
3031:
3019:
3001:
2947:
2938:
2925:
2786:
2737:
2725:
2701:
2686:
2668:
2644:
2598:
2581:
2561:
2536:
2523:
2499:
2482:
No, because that would breach "not an instruction manual", which this article doesn't. It's merely an
2473:
2464:
2427:
2414:
2396:
2386:
2369:
2357:
2339:
2238:
2189:
2164:
2140:
2125:
2109:
2095:
2079:
2063:
2026:
2009:
2004:
1988:
1978:
1959:
1939:
1926:
1910:
1871:
1848:
1834:
1808:
1794:
1770:
1756:
1720:
1702:
1692:
1675:
1663:
1645:
1544:
1491:
1469:
1456:
1426:
1408:
Ain’t It Cool News, however, reports that there is no such connection, from an email from J.J. Abrams.
1296:
1256:
1244:
1232:
1220:
1204:
1171:
1160:
1144:
1135:
1122:
1107:
1069:
1060:
1047:
1034:
1008:
995:
973:
868:
819:
812:
759:
756:
732:
711:
691:
679:
659:
633:
626:
511:
467:
448:
439:
415:
405:
306:
247:
234:
220:
208:
188:
87:
2884:
1478:
Can we get the AFD noted on the article's talk page so we don't go through this again? Good call Ck.
1324:
1288:
1181:
896:
851:
788:
464:
2782:
2234:
1540:
1015:
864:
463:. Of the images now deleted, is the copyright holder known and, if so, has anyone made contact? --
83:
3124:
2595:
2381:
2023:
1687:
1580:
763:
names all the companies offering these services so there is no advertising danger signed stefanbcn
3308:
401:
as improperly licensed, and probably copyvios. As such, the basis for deletion no longer applies.
242:
2974:
2903:
coverage and liberal availability. It is unparalleled for its coverage of characters used by the
2899:
for 'Code2000 font' returns tens of thousands of hits, most recommending this font for its broad
2451:
game guide". I presume the nom must refer to "not an instruction manual", which this hardly is.
2274:
2040:
1733:
283:
3168:, no admin action required. The original deletion has been endorsed as a short/spam article. –
3108:
2519:
2512:
2488:
2453:
2436:
2335:
Again this was not a one sided debate, out of process close, these were both ongoing debates.
1922:
1899:
1860:
1823:
1443:
1395:
245:
771:.com). I am not sure if it should be merged with similar experiences in other cities such as
3336:
3286:
3060:
3013:
2977:
2716:
2695:
2624:
2533:
2155:
2134:
2088:
2076:
1936:
724:
656:
508:
232:
3043:
2550:
2092:
1787:
1229:
1132:
1057:
977:
700:
688:
217:
3253:
3010:
2956:
2867:
2319:
1893:
Probably slightly hastily closed, but of the three articles here, this is the one where
1625:
1377:
949:
592:
168:
2365:- it was a common sense decision. had I seen this AFD I would have done the same thing.
1671:- it was a common sense decision. had I seen this AFD I would have done the same thing.
3318:
3120:
3004:
2912:
2778:
2679:
2653:
2615:
2554:
2378:
2230:
2178:
2173:
2118:
2072:
1791:
1684:
1641:
Improper close. This was not a one sided debate and this is completely out of process.
1572:
1536:
1527:
1484:
1437:
1193:
860:
743:
194:
79:
755:(origibnal bicing page in german now merged into the too general term of bike rental
3092:
3080:
2822:
2683:
2661:
2657:
2656:
is the much more commonly sited reason for closing early, which derives authority of
2632:
2628:
2607:
2577:
2558:
2546:
2444:
2440:
2350:
2266:
2221:
2182:
2122:
2106:
2056:
2044:
2032:
1974:
1952:
1948:
1894:
1656:
1241:
1189:
1103:
804:
675:
618:
435:
2968:
1026:, and many others. Knowledge has articles almost about every Bible translation (see
3360:
2516:
2470:
2393:
2336:
1985:
1919:
1845:
1805:
1699:
1642:
1253:
1217:
1201:
1168:
1157:
1141:
1128:
1119:
1066:
1031:
992:
970:
445:
412:
3238:
2995:
2852:
2443:
as it applies (or doesn't apply, more to the point) to this article. Incidentally
2304:
2018:
encyclopedia would have all this material, and the tactics, etc. in a big article
1951:
material. Not to mention the nominator is right - this is a complete violation of
1610:
1362:
934:
577:
153:
3169:
3057:
3028:
2971:
2935:
2734:
2665:
2366:
2186:
1999:
1672:
1405:
Cinemablend and RopeOfSilicon.com similarly report a connection between the two.
1185:
1114:
1053:
1044:
780:
720:
547:
229:
185:
1176:
Nope, it means that I tried Google, Google Books, and Google Scholar and found
3096:
2983:
2922:
2641:
2354:
2060:
1767:
1660:
776:
772:
768:
648:
610:
1418:
I hereby nominate this for the most ridiculous AfD closure of the year 2007.
1086:
He did not translate the Apostle's Bible. According to his own posted bio at
3313:
2908:
2774:
2407:
2226:
2185:, which is policy, so I see no reason it shouldn't be applied in this case.
1713:
1532:
1479:
1462:
1419:
856:
75:
2970:. It is an important font because it includes a over 60,000 Unicode glyphs
2992:
1167:
But your opionion about notability of translation is a private opinion. --
1094:
1019:
3007:
2814:
2769:
2678:
close, even though as above, I'm not sure it should have been closed per
2635:. I realize that these two chess articles aren't referenced at all, but
2572:
1969:
1098:
1065:
Well, Knowledge has articles about bestselling books and their authors.--
800:
719:
and then either expand/source or merge to a general article about these.
670:
614:
430:
791:
because maybe the system is different, but the generic page seems to be
2900:
2545:
unusually grotesque deletionist excess and an absurd interpretation of
2447:
does not say "not a game guide" as per the nomination - it says "not a
1090:
1087:
1200:
for a longer explanation of why the sources need to be independent.)
1020:
Joel Kalvesmaki, Ph.D. in Early Christian Studies, Catholic University
228:- a sourced article on a scientific theory should not be speedied. --
2733:. There was no realistic chance that this article would be deleted.
965:
The article is about translator of new bestselling Bible translation
784:
539:
499:
1096:
is in my opinion a RS, and lists his edition as "a light revision".
2511:. No one said to keep the article because "ILIKEIT". If you read
1821:
for the same reason. Somehow I think that might be kept, as well.
2980:
2591:
2019:
3311:, a referenced article would likely not be a speedy candidate. --
2986:
2965:
3274:
2962:
2892:
2590:
have all this material, and the strategy, etc. in a big article
2071:
from closing debates with legitimate arguments on both sides as
2117:
close, even though I'm not sure it should have been closed per
3009:
as well as making it important for multilingual applications
2989:
2439:, but rather disagreement with the nom's imaginative use of
282:– restored by original deleter, nothing further to review –
3273:. I have since determined that the firm is listed on the
2059:
or CSK, or urgent enough to go to the admin noticeboard.
813:
805:
627:
619:
2392:
keep it". That's hardly a consensus building argument.--
3234:
3230:
3226:
2888:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2300:
2296:
2292:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1398:
was too lazy to read the article in question. I quote:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1000:
The main assertion of importance is that he translated
930:
926:
922:
573:
569:
565:
359:
355:
347:
339:
149:
145:
141:
1784:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Glossary of sumo terms
687:
per DGG. If there are newspaper articles it can stay.
2353:
and I dont think it should've been closed with haste
1659:
and I dont think it should've been closed with haste
752:
older official site in english(not updated anymore)
3054:. As above, plus it has a significant edit history.
1415:(to see the references, look at the deleted edits).
195:
http://psp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/28/2/224
753:
2435:I'd say that the majority of Keep votes were not
980:, who deleted this article is proposed to delete
2100:I agree with Chick Bowen and EdJohnston. While
1292:– DRV moot as closer chose to reverse closing –
1728:perhaps this disagreement could be resolved by
2150:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Chess strategy
1782:This seems to be the editors goal -- see also
2711:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Chess tactics
8:
2976:, making it more complete than, for example
1897:really doesn't apply. Encyclopedic article.
3182:The following is an archived debate of the
2796:The following is an archived debate of the
2621:Knowledge:WikiProject Board and table games
2248:The following is an archived debate of the
1554:The following is an archived debate of the
1306:The following is an archived debate of the
1043:Commercial links are not reliable sources.-
878:The following is an archived debate of the
521:The following is an archived debate of the
459:For reference, a copy of the article is at
411:I agree, and I'm the one who deleted it. –
316:The following is an archived debate of the
97:The following is an archived debate of the
3153:
2762:
2214:
1998:, pretty clear where that one was headed.
1520:
1281:
844:
492:
271:
63:
2921:)) has been informed, but prefers DRV. --
1440:, since it will simply be overturned :).
507:, may be merged with similar articles. –
204:gave enough context to be meaningful. --
3380:The above is an archived debate of the
3138:The above is an archived debate of the
3119:extremely notable as Unicode fonts go.
2747:The above is an archived debate of the
2199:The above is an archived debate of the
1505:The above is an archived debate of the
1438:No need to put this through the process
1266:The above is an archived debate of the
829:The above is an archived debate of the
477:The above is an archived debate of the
256:The above is an archived debate of the
1931:What's here to debate? Endorse speedy
3305:Endorse deletion but allow recreation
2069:Admins should be strongly discouraged
7:
1091:http://www.apostlesbible.com/bio.pdf
2614:. Same reasoning as I posted for
1918:. This is an importnat article.
28:
3277:symbol GHL, performed over $ 100
2905:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
2035:, and whether the article serves
1028:Modern_English_Bible_translations
335:File:Image:CallasVioletta1956.jpg
3093:Knowledge is not made of paper
1531:– Endorse closure as keep – --
1056:is a self-publishing company.
424:so just restore it. (I assume
1:
1252:per EdJohnston and FloNight.
1198:Knowledge:Independent sources
279:Image:CallasVioletta1956.jpg
2891:, we also have a number of
2181:derives its authority from
797:#Public-Private Partnership
3407:
2606:as not meeting any of the
2225:– endorse speedy keep – --
976:By the same administrator
651:and similar articles into
74:– Deletion overturned – --
3371:04:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
3350:02:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
3340:02:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
3330:01:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
3300:01:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
3290:01:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
3173:15:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
3129:14:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
3112:11:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
3100:09:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
3084:08:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
3047:21:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
3032:07:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
3020:20:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2948:13:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2939:06:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2926:04:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2787:21:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
2738:11:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
2726:21:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2702:16:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2687:16:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2669:11:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
2664:as an appropriate venue?
2645:00:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2599:22:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2582:17:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2562:16:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2537:15:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2528:As above, endorse speedy
2524:14:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2500:17:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2474:17:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2465:14:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2428:13:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2415:07:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2397:13:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2387:07:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2370:06:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2358:06:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2340:05:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2239:21:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
2190:11:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
2165:21:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2141:16:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2126:16:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2110:06:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2096:03:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2080:03:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
2064:23:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2027:22:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
2010:18:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1989:17:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1979:17:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1960:16:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1940:15:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1927:14:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1911:14:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1872:17:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1849:17:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1835:17:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1809:16:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1795:15:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1771:09:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1757:08:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1721:07:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1703:13:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1693:07:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1676:06:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1664:06:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1646:05:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1545:21:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
1492:08:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1470:08:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1457:07:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1433:Overturn and speedy close
1427:07:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1297:13:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1257:14:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
1245:16:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1233:03:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1221:22:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1205:21:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1172:20:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1161:20:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1145:20:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1136:19:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1123:19:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1108:17:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1070:20:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1061:19:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1048:15:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1035:14:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1030:and their translators).--
1009:13:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
996:19:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
974:13:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
869:21:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
820:08:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
793:Community bicycle program
760:00:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
733:20:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
712:16:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
692:03:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
680:16:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
660:15:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
634:15:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
512:07:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
468:16:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
449:22:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
440:16:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
416:16:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
406:16:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
307:08:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
248:00:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
235:04:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
221:03:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
209:01:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
189:18:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
88:15:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
3387:Please do not modify it.
3189:Please do not modify it.
3145:Please do not modify it.
2803:Please do not modify it.
2773:– Overturn deletion – --
2754:Please do not modify it.
2255:Please do not modify it.
2206:Please do not modify it.
1561:Please do not modify it.
1512:Please do not modify it.
1313:Please do not modify it.
1273:Please do not modify it.
1131:showing his notability.
885:Please do not modify it.
855:– Deletion endorsed – --
836:Please do not modify it.
795:, especially in section
613:have copied the system.
528:Please do not modify it.
484:Please do not modify it.
323:Please do not modify it.
263:Please do not modify it.
214:Overturn and list at AfD
104:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
3201:Greenhill & Company
3161:Greenhill & Company
2051:on technical grounds.
1819:American football rules
1732:the text to wikibooks?
428:one is not a copyvio.)
3384:of the article above.
3186:of the article above.
3142:of the article above.
2800:of the article above.
2751:of the article above.
2694:. Encyclopedic topic.
2252:of the article above.
2203:of the article above.
2133:. Encyclopedic topic.
1558:of the article above.
1509:of the article above.
1310:of the article above.
1270:of the article above.
882:of the article above.
833:of the article above.
721:Matthew Brown (Morven)
653:Bicycle rental program
525:of the article above.
481:of the article above.
444:I just restored it. –
320:of the article above.
260:of the article above.
101:of the article above.
2085:Wrong use of WP:SNOW,
1945:O dear gosh, overturn
1016:AuthorHouse publisher
116:Attitude perseverance
71:Attitude perseverance
2885:MediaWiki:Common.css
2633:attributable sources
1858:instruction manual.
1325:Ethan Haas Was Right
1289:Ethan Haas Was Right
1052:Not to mention that
789:Stockholm City bikes
2709:for the reasons on
2549:. Also a somewhat
2375:Endorse speedy keep
2148:for the reasons on
1681:Endorse speedy keep
1002:The Apostles' Bible
982:The Apostles' Bible
967:The Apostles' Bible
3316:
3064:2007-07-17 07:11 Z
2406:per common sense.
1712:per common sense.
3394:
3393:
3314:
3152:
3151:
3127:
3065:
2785:
2761:
2760:
2724:
2384:
2237:
2213:
2212:
2163:
1690:
1543:
1519:
1518:
1455:
1396:User:Ck_lostsword
1280:
1279:
1226:Endorse deletion.
867:
843:
842:
491:
490:
270:
269:
202:overturn deletion
86:
3398:
3389:
3367:
3364:
3328:
3256:
3242:
3224:
3191:
3166:allow recreation
3154:
3147:
3123:
3063:
2978:Arial Unicode MS
2870:
2856:
2838:
2805:
2777:
2763:
2756:
2720:
2625:Diplomacy (game)
2494:
2491:
2459:
2456:
2412:
2382:
2322:
2308:
2290:
2257:
2229:
2215:
2208:
2159:
2089:User:Chick Bowen
1957:The Evil Spartan
1916:Endorse the keep
1905:
1902:
1866:
1863:
1829:
1826:
1753:
1751:
1749:
1747:
1745:
1718:
1688:
1628:
1614:
1596:
1563:
1535:
1521:
1514:
1489:
1482:
1467:
1454:
1441:
1424:
1380:
1366:
1348:
1315:
1282:
1275:
1250:endorse deletion
1238:Endorse deletion
1129:reliable sources
952:
938:
920:
887:
859:
845:
838:
817:
809:
708:
631:
623:
595:
581:
563:
530:
493:
486:
403:The Evil Spartan
378:
364:
363:
325:
303:
301:
299:
297:
295:
272:
265:
184:Not informative
171:
157:
139:
106:
78:
64:
53:
33:
3406:
3405:
3401:
3400:
3399:
3397:
3396:
3395:
3385:
3382:deletion review
3365:
3362:
3326:
3312:
3265:
3259:
3252:
3251:
3245:
3215:
3199:
3187:
3184:deletion review
3143:
3140:deletion review
2887:. (Besides the
2879:
2873:
2866:
2865:
2859:
2829:
2813:
2801:
2798:deletion review
2752:
2749:deletion review
2492:
2489:
2457:
2454:
2408:
2331:
2325:
2318:
2317:
2311:
2281:
2265:
2253:
2250:deletion review
2204:
2201:deletion review
1996:Endorse closure
1903:
1900:
1864:
1861:
1827:
1824:
1743:
1741:
1739:
1737:
1735:
1714:
1637:
1631:
1624:
1623:
1617:
1587:
1571:
1559:
1556:deletion review
1510:
1507:deletion review
1488:
1485:
1480:
1463:
1442:
1420:
1389:
1383:
1376:
1375:
1369:
1339:
1323:
1311:
1308:deletion review
1271:
1268:deletion review
1113:He has studied
978:User:NawlinWiki
961:
955:
948:
947:
941:
911:
897:Paul W Esposito
895:
883:
880:deletion review
852:Paul W Esposito
834:
831:deletion review
706:
604:
598:
591:
590:
584:
554:
538:
526:
523:deletion review
503:– Consensus to
482:
479:deletion review
387:
381:
374:
373:
367:
337:
333:
321:
318:deletion review
293:
291:
289:
287:
285:
261:
258:deletion review
180:
174:
167:
166:
160:
130:
114:
102:
99:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
3404:
3402:
3392:
3391:
3376:
3375:
3374:
3373:
3354:
3353:
3352:
3332:
3322:
3302:
3267:
3266:
3263:
3257:
3249:
3243:
3194:
3193:
3178:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3150:
3149:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3131:
3114:
3102:
3086:
3068:
3067:
3049:
3036:
3035:
3034:
2950:
2941:
2893:template links
2881:
2880:
2877:
2871:
2863:
2857:
2808:
2807:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2759:
2758:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2728:
2704:
2689:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2616:chess strategy
2601:
2596:Carlossuarez46
2584:
2564:
2555:Rules of Chess
2539:
2526:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2477:
2476:
2430:
2417:
2404:Speedy Endorse
2401:
2400:
2399:
2372:
2360:
2333:
2332:
2329:
2323:
2315:
2309:
2260:
2259:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2211:
2210:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2167:
2143:
2128:
2112:
2098:
2082:
2066:
2029:
2024:Carlossuarez46
2012:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1962:
1942:
1929:
1913:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1852:
1851:
1838:
1837:
1812:
1811:
1798:
1797:
1774:
1773:
1760:
1759:
1723:
1710:Speedy Endorse
1707:
1706:
1705:
1678:
1666:
1639:
1638:
1635:
1629:
1621:
1615:
1573:Chess strategy
1566:
1565:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1528:Chess strategy
1517:
1516:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1486:
1473:
1472:
1413:
1412:
1409:
1406:
1403:
1391:
1390:
1387:
1381:
1373:
1367:
1318:
1317:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1278:
1277:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1247:
1235:
1223:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1164:
1163:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1084:
1083:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1063:
1038:
1037:
1012:
1011:
998:
963:
962:
959:
953:
945:
939:
890:
889:
874:
873:
872:
871:
841:
840:
825:
824:
823:
822:
748:
747:
744:User:stefanbcn
736:
735:
714:
694:
682:
662:
606:
605:
602:
596:
588:
582:
533:
532:
517:
516:
515:
514:
489:
488:
473:
472:
471:
470:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
419:
418:
389:
388:
385:
379:
371:
365:
328:
327:
312:
311:
310:
309:
268:
267:
252:
251:
238:
237:
223:
211:
182:
181:
178:
172:
164:
158:
109:
108:
93:
92:
91:
90:
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3403:
3390:
3388:
3383:
3378:
3377:
3372:
3369:
3368:
3358:
3355:
3351:
3348:
3343:
3342:
3341:
3338:
3333:
3331:
3327:
3325:
3319:
3317:
3310:
3306:
3303:
3301:
3298:
3294:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3272:
3262:
3255:
3248:
3240:
3236:
3232:
3228:
3223:
3219:
3214:
3210:
3206:
3202:
3198:
3197:
3196:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3185:
3180:
3179:
3174:
3171:
3167:
3163:
3162:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3155:
3148:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3135:
3130:
3126:
3122:
3118:
3115:
3113:
3110:
3106:
3103:
3101:
3098:
3097:Gareth Hughes
3094:
3090:
3087:
3085:
3082:
3077:
3073:
3070:
3069:
3066:
3062:
3059:
3053:
3050:
3048:
3045:
3040:
3037:
3033:
3030:
3026:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3018:
3015:
3011:
3008:
3005:
3002:
2999:
2996:
2993:
2990:
2987:
2984:
2981:
2979:
2975:
2972:
2969:
2966:
2963:
2960:
2957:
2954:
2951:
2949:
2946:
2942:
2940:
2937:
2933:
2930:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2924:
2920:
2917:
2914:
2910:
2906:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2890:
2889:article links
2886:
2876:
2869:
2862:
2854:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2837:
2833:
2828:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2799:
2794:
2793:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2771:
2767:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2757:
2755:
2750:
2745:
2744:
2739:
2736:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2718:
2712:
2708:
2705:
2703:
2700:
2697:
2693:
2690:
2688:
2685:
2681:
2677:
2674:
2670:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2643:
2638:
2634:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2617:
2613:
2610:criteria and
2609:
2605:
2602:
2600:
2597:
2593:
2588:
2585:
2583:
2579:
2575:
2574:
2568:
2565:
2563:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2543:
2540:
2538:
2535:
2531:
2527:
2525:
2521:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2507:
2501:
2498:
2497:
2495:
2485:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2475:
2472:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2463:
2462:
2460:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2431:
2429:
2426:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2405:
2402:
2398:
2395:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2385:
2380:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2364:
2361:
2359:
2356:
2352:
2347:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2338:
2328:
2321:
2314:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2289:
2285:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2267:Chess tactics
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2258:
2256:
2251:
2246:
2245:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2223:
2222:Chess tactics
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2209:
2207:
2202:
2197:
2196:
2191:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2175:
2171:
2168:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2157:
2151:
2147:
2144:
2142:
2139:
2136:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2108:
2103:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2083:
2081:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2067:
2065:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2028:
2025:
2021:
2016:
2013:
2011:
2008:
2007:
2003:
2002:
1997:
1994:
1990:
1987:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1971:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1928:
1924:
1921:
1917:
1914:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1906:
1896:
1892:
1889:
1888:
1873:
1870:
1869:
1867:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1850:
1847:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1836:
1833:
1832:
1830:
1820:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1807:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1796:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1772:
1769:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1758:
1755:
1754:
1731:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1711:
1708:
1704:
1701:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1691:
1686:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1674:
1670:
1667:
1665:
1662:
1658:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1644:
1634:
1627:
1620:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1591:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1564:
1562:
1557:
1552:
1551:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1515:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1502:
1493:
1490:
1483:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1439:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1416:
1410:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1397:
1386:
1379:
1372:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1347:
1343:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1309:
1304:
1303:
1298:
1295:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1276:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1263:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1215:
1212:
1211:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1118:acceptible.--
1116:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1092:
1088:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1010:
1007:
1003:
999:
997:
994:
990:
987:
986:
985:
983:
979:
975:
972:
968:
958:
951:
944:
936:
932:
928:
924:
919:
915:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
893:
892:
891:
888:
886:
881:
876:
875:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
853:
849:
848:
847:
846:
839:
837:
832:
827:
826:
821:
818:
816:
810:
808:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
765:
764:
761:
758:
754:
751:
745:
741:
738:
737:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
715:
713:
710:
709:
702:
698:
695:
693:
690:
686:
683:
681:
677:
673:
672:
666:
663:
661:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
636:
635:
632:
630:
624:
622:
616:
612:
601:
594:
587:
579:
575:
571:
567:
562:
558:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
534:
531:
529:
524:
519:
518:
513:
510:
506:
502:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
487:
485:
480:
475:
474:
469:
466:
462:
458:
457:
450:
447:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
432:
427:
423:
422:
421:
420:
417:
414:
410:
409:
408:
407:
404:
400:
397:
394:
384:
377:
376:copy of image
370:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
336:
332:
331:
330:
329:
326:
324:
319:
314:
313:
308:
305:
304:
281:
280:
276:
275:
274:
273:
266:
264:
259:
254:
253:
250:
249:
246:
244:
236:
233:
231:
227:
224:
222:
219:
215:
212:
210:
207:
203:
200:
199:
198:
196:
191:
190:
187:
177:
170:
163:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
111:
110:
107:
105:
100:
95:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
3386:
3379:
3361:
3356:
3323:
3309:User:W.marsh
3304:
3278:
3268:
3188:
3181:
3165:
3159:
3144:
3137:
3116:
3109:DavidCBryant
3104:
3088:
3075:
3071:
3055:
3051:
3038:
3024:
2952:
2931:
2915:
2882:
2802:
2795:
2768:
2753:
2746:
2730:
2714:
2707:Endorse keep
2706:
2692:Endorse keep
2691:
2675:
2649:
2636:
2629:WP:NOT#GUIDE
2611:
2603:
2587:Endorse keep
2586:
2571:
2566:
2541:
2529:
2509:Endorse keep
2508:
2487:
2483:
2452:
2448:
2432:
2420:endorse keep
2419:
2409:
2403:
2374:
2362:
2351:WP:NOT#GUIDE
2345:
2334:
2254:
2247:
2220:
2205:
2198:
2169:
2153:
2146:Endorse keep
2145:
2131:Endorse keep
2130:
2114:
2101:
2084:
2068:
2052:
2048:
2036:
2033:WP:NOT#GUIDE
2015:Endorse keep
2014:
2005:
2000:
1995:
1968:
1964:
1953:WP:NOT#HOWTO
1944:
1932:
1915:
1898:
1895:WP:NOT#GUIDE
1890:
1859:
1822:
1779:
1734:
1729:
1725:
1715:
1709:
1680:
1668:
1657:WP:NOT#GUIDE
1651:
1640:
1560:
1553:
1526:
1511:
1504:
1464:
1444:ck lostsword
1432:
1421:
1417:
1414:
1392:
1312:
1305:
1287:
1272:
1265:
1249:
1237:
1225:
1213:
1177:
1097:
1085:
1081:keep deleted
1080:
988:
964:
884:
877:
850:
835:
828:
814:
806:
749:
739:
716:
707:Boricuaeddie
704:
696:
684:
669:
664:
644:
640:
628:
620:
607:
527:
520:
504:
498:
483:
476:
429:
425:
390:
322:
315:
284:
277:
262:
255:
239:
225:
213:
201:
192:
183:
103:
96:
69:
59:16 July 2007
58:
49:2007 July 17
35:2007 July 15
3337:Knowsetfree
3287:Knowsetfree
3014:Paul August
2717:Sarregouset
2696:Paul August
2534:Mike Rosoft
2156:Sarregouset
2135:Paul August
2077:Chick Bowen
2041:WP:SNOWBALL
1937:Mike Rosoft
1730:transwiking
1115:Koine Greek
1054:AuthorHouse
781:Call a Bike
757:62.57.7.180
657:Mike Rosoft
509:Mike Rosoft
461:Answers.com
3044:EdJohnston
2897:web search
2513:WP:ILIKEIT
2490:Eliminator
2455:Eliminator
2437:WP:ILIKEIT
2093:EdJohnston
1901:Eliminator
1862:Eliminator
1825:Eliminator
1230:EdJohnston
1182:notability
1133:NawlinWiki
1058:NawlinWiki
701:EdJohnston
689:EdJohnston
668:undeleted.
465:Iamunknown
218:EdJohnston
3283:M & A
3039:Overturn.
2379:Sjakkalle
2037:primarily
1947:- hardly
1792:XinJeisan
1685:Sjakkalle
1089:, he is "
815:talk (ca)
807:talk (en)
629:talk (ca)
621:talk (en)
44:2007 July
3117:overturn
3105:Overturn
3089:Overturn
3081:Latebird
3072:Overturn
3052:Overturn
2953:Overturn
2919:contribs
2815:Code2000
2770:Code2000
2684:Kbdank71
2604:Overturn
2559:JayHenry
2484:overview
2383:(Check!)
2346:Overturn
2172:close.
2123:Kbdank71
2107:JayHenry
2049:overturn
1788:WP:POINT
1698:there.--
1689:(Check!)
1652:Overturn
1242:FloNight
1196:. (See
989:undelete
740:Undelete
717:Undelete
697:Undelete
685:Undelete
665:Undelete
641:undelete
639:I'd say
505:undelete
226:Overturn
20: |
3357:Comment
3347:W.marsh
3297:W.marsh
3279:Billion
3271:My page
3247:restore
3218:protect
3213:history
3058:Michael
3025:Comment
2945:W.marsh
2932:Comment
2901:Unicode
2861:restore
2832:protect
2827:history
2731:Endorse
2680:WP:SNOW
2676:Endorse
2654:WP:SNOW
2650:Comment
2567:Endorse
2542:Comment
2517:Bubba73
2471:Crossmr
2433:Endorse
2425:W.marsh
2394:Crossmr
2363:Endorse
2337:Crossmr
2313:restore
2284:protect
2279:history
2179:WP:SNOW
2174:WP:SNOW
2170:Endorse
2119:WP:SNOW
2115:Endorse
2073:WP:SNOW
1986:Crossmr
1984:game.--
1965:Endorse
1920:Bubba73
1891:Endorse
1846:Crossmr
1806:Crossmr
1780:Comment
1700:Crossmr
1669:Endorse
1643:Crossmr
1619:restore
1590:protect
1585:history
1371:restore
1342:protect
1337:history
1294:W.marsh
1254:JoshuaZ
1218:Heather
1214:Comment
1202:GRBerry
1194:WP:NPOV
1169:Tomakiv
1158:GRBerry
1142:Tomakiv
1120:Tomakiv
1067:Tomakiv
1032:Tomakiv
1006:W.marsh
993:Tomakiv
971:Tomakiv
943:restore
914:protect
909:history
769:El País
586:restore
557:protect
552:history
446:Quadell
413:Quadell
399:deleted
369:restore
348:history
243:Jaranda
206:W.marsh
162:restore
133:protect
128:history
3222:delete
3170:Wafulz
3029:Ptcamn
2936:ugen64
2836:delete
2735:JulesH
2722:(Talk)
2666:JulesH
2662:WP:NOT
2658:WP:IAR
2612:relist
2608:WP:CSK
2551:pointy
2547:WP:NOT
2520:(talk)
2445:WP:NOT
2441:WP:NOT
2367:ugen64
2288:delete
2187:JulesH
2183:WP:IAR
2161:(Talk)
2053:Relist
2045:WP:CSK
1949:WP:CSK
1923:(talk)
1673:ugen64
1594:delete
1346:delete
1192:, and
1190:WP:NOR
1045:Wafulz
1024:Amazon
918:delete
785:OYBike
777:Vélo'v
773:Vélib'
699:- per
649:Vélib'
611:Vélib'
561:delete
540:Bicing
500:Bicing
230:DS1953
186:Borisu
137:delete
3254:cache
3239:views
3231:watch
3227:links
3074:- if
2923:KSmrq
2895:.) A
2868:cache
2853:views
2845:watch
2841:links
2682:. --
2642:Barno
2592:chess
2449:video
2410:Grue
2355:Corpx
2320:cache
2305:views
2297:watch
2293:links
2121:. --
2061:Barno
2047:, so
2020:chess
1768:Corpx
1736:: -->
1726:Query
1716:Grue
1661:Corpx
1626:cache
1611:views
1603:watch
1599:links
1465:Grue
1422:Grue
1378:cache
1363:views
1355:watch
1351:links
950:cache
935:views
927:watch
923:links
647:with
645:merge
593:cache
578:views
570:watch
566:links
356:watch
352:links
286:: -->
169:cache
154:views
146:watch
142:links
52:: -->
16:<
3363:Citi
3315:Kinu
3275:NYSE
3235:logs
3209:talk
3205:edit
3125:(𒁳)
3095:. —
2913:talk
2909:Sr13
2849:logs
2823:talk
2819:edit
2783:Desk
2779:Talk
2775:ST47
2578:talk
2532:. -
2530:keep
2301:logs
2275:talk
2271:edit
2235:Desk
2231:Talk
2227:ST47
2102:Keep
2087:per
1975:talk
1935:. -
1933:keep
1752:<
1607:logs
1581:talk
1577:edit
1541:Desk
1537:Talk
1533:ST47
1481:Neil
1359:logs
1333:talk
1329:edit
1186:WP:V
1178:zero
1104:talk
931:logs
905:talk
901:edit
865:Desk
861:Talk
857:ST47
703:. --
676:talk
643:and
574:logs
548:talk
544:edit
436:talk
426:this
396:been
360:logs
344:talk
340:edit
302:<
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
84:Desk
80:Talk
76:ST47
32:<
3366:Cat
3281:of
3261:AfD
3121:dab
3076:any
2875:AfD
2573:DGG
2327:AfD
2057:CSD
2006:ʏɑɴ
2001:ɑʀк
1970:DGG
1633:AfD
1385:AfD
1099:DGG
957:AfD
801:SMP
799:.--
787:or
671:DGG
615:SMP
600:AfD
431:DGG
393:now
383:IfD
176:AfD
22:Log
3345:--
3237:|
3233:|
3229:|
3225:|
3220:|
3216:|
3211:|
3207:|
3164:–
3061:Z.
3012:.
3006:,
3003:,
3000:,
2997:,
2994:,
2991:,
2985:,
2973:,
2967:,
2964:,
2961:,
2958:,
2851:|
2847:|
2843:|
2839:|
2834:|
2830:|
2825:|
2821:|
2580:)
2522:,
2493:JR
2458:JR
2423:--
2303:|
2299:|
2295:|
2291:|
2286:|
2282:|
2277:|
2273:|
1977:)
1955:.
1925:,
1904:JR
1865:JR
1828:JR
1609:|
1605:|
1601:|
1597:|
1592:|
1588:|
1583:|
1579:|
1361:|
1357:|
1353:|
1349:|
1344:|
1340:|
1335:|
1331:|
1188:,
1106:)
1022:,
1018:,
991:--
984:.
933:|
929:|
925:|
921:|
916:|
912:|
907:|
903:|
811:-
803:-
783:,
779:,
775:,
742:.
731:)
678:)
625:-
617:-
576:|
572:|
568:|
564:|
559:|
555:|
550:|
546:|
438:)
358:|
354:|
350:|
346:|
342:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
42::
3324:c
3320:/
3264:)
3258:|
3250:|
3244:(
3241:)
3203:(
3056:—
3017:☎
2916:·
2911:(
2878:)
2872:|
2864:|
2858:(
2855:)
2817:(
2781:·
2715:–
2713:.
2699:☎
2576:(
2330:)
2324:|
2316:|
2310:(
2307:)
2269:(
2233:·
2154:–
2152:.
2138:☎
1973:(
1790:?
1750:t
1748:n
1746:a
1744:i
1742:d
1740:a
1738:R
1636:)
1630:|
1622:|
1616:(
1613:)
1575:(
1539:·
1487:╦
1452:C
1450:•
1448:T
1446:•
1388:)
1382:|
1374:|
1368:(
1365:)
1327:(
1102:(
960:)
954:|
946:|
940:(
937:)
899:(
863:·
729:C
727::
725:T
723:(
674:(
603:)
597:|
589:|
583:(
580:)
542:(
434:(
386:)
380:|
372:|
366:(
362:)
338:(
300:t
298:n
296:a
294:i
292:d
290:a
288:R
179:)
173:|
165:|
159:(
156:)
118:(
82:·
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.