608:. I cannot view the text of the article, so will not comment on its content. My suggestion to overturn and relist at AFD is mostly for the sake of courtesy. I am aware that a speedy deletion that is contested need not be overturned, but when editors other than the article's creator also request undeletion, I feel it's a good sign that more discussion (and an opportunity to develop the article) is warranted. --
952:, who made careers out of stating that they were once gay and no longer are. How can someone who states in a reliable source that they were once gay and now no longer are possibly be subject to BLP concerns? How can someone who writes books extolling their own transformation from gay to straight possibly raise concerns that it might be "implied" that they used to be gay when
1151:. Poor debate, for sure, but the fundamental fact is that this was a list of people asserting a sexuality for which no reliable sources can be found any more. Heavy on "said to be", light on sources. And what, precisely, is supposed to be encyclopaedic about lists of people who might once have gone gay but don't any more? I don't see it myself.
990:. Kind of a tough one. Nom makes a good point that many of the delete !votes were weak but I believe the points were still valid. Also concede that the consensus was weak, so while I will endorse the deletion, I would also not mind seeing it relisted to generate more consensus one way or another, but not flat-out overturning.
726:
1275:
it any more of a problem than any list of people by sexuality? If we get the wrong people on this, then we'll have problems, but same goes for the 'lists of gay people' which I suspect we have. POV issues rise here - but looking at it, it seems to me that the deletion argument is also guilty of that. Ok, my vote
1274:
There is obviously no consensus to delete in that debate - thus an explained delete closure just begs to be overturned. Given the lack of consensus, is there an overriding policy reason to delete anyway? Now, I'm torn - this is a BLP disaster waiting to happen. But then, if it is properly sourced, is
973:
That doesn't look like a consensus to delete to me. Most of the delete !votes used arguments that were subsequently rebutted, or which could trivially be solved without deletion, or which are somewhat week (e.g. "Is this a joke? Once gay, always gay" or "This doesn't provide useful imformation" (AKA
2409:
and redeletions. As several have already said, passing mentions are not sufficient to support an encyclopedia article. As to the claim that he hit "#1 on the iTunes dance chart", everyone can be number one if you parse your selection criteria narrowly enough. iTunes alone lists 23 different chart
624:
text of the page was "Fighting Words is a political webcomic by Ben Smith. Material from the strip is printed as part of
Attitude 3: The New Subversive Online Cartoonists" plus an almost empty infobox and some minor wikification. There is no reasonable assertion of notability in that text and the
1408:
I can't say as I find it at all reasonable to put words in the mouths of the people who !voted in the AFD. Had they wanted to raise the issue at AFD, they could have. To answer the specific concern, however, off the top of my head the membership criteria would be something along the lines of "for
838:
concerns, which are invalid because the article was sourced and it's very unlikely that someone is going to sue for being called heterosexual; "unmaintainable" and "too broad" which since the list only had a handful of entries is ludicrous on its face and "once gay, always gay" which is rank POV
1224:
Are you deliberately being obtuse? This was not "List of people who had reparative therapy" (although many on the list did in fact have it). This was a list of people who used to self-identify as gay and no longer do. The reparative therapy link was offered to show that the notion of gay people
927:
A number of reasons were given for deletion in the Afd, all of them valid. Anmong other, I questioned the assumption that a gay person would not object to being called heterosexual is probably false; there is further the problem that listing here implies the person was once gay. Therefore, BLP
956:
It's a ridiculous non-concern. BLP does not demand that biographies of living people be deleted in their entirety if there is unsourced or poorly sourced material. It demands that the unsourced or poorly sourced material be removed. Since the items on the list were properly sourced BLP cannot
216:
unlikely that a valid article on this can be developed which is not both self-referential and obvious from the combination of "wiki" plus "vandalism". I suppose if
Miltopia wants to waste time that is not our problem, but the deletion consensus was as much in respect of the subject as of the
1388:
lists should always include unambiguous statements of membership criteria based on definitions made by reputable sources, especially in difficult or contentious topics. Do you think it would be reasonable to read the AfD as saying that the consensus thought it is unlikely that an unambiguous
839:
pushing. The !vote count was 11-7 which is hardly a clear-cut majority, especially in light of the poor reasons offered for several delete !votes (which should lead to those opinions being discounted) and the fact that one of the delete !votes actually supported the notion of having
822:
2156:
No one's noting the DRVs on the article talk page. (They can't, of course, because of the curious use of PP.) I might have known what the issues were. Clearly there are issues so bad that they require extreme lengths to prevent the creation of the article. -
856:- Instead of requesting that the history be restored, I thought I would state the following: The list included "people who at one point identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual but no longer do" and "people wrongly believed to have renounced LGB identity."
957:
properly be used as an excuse for deleting the items or the list that the items make up. Also, at no point in the AFD was the notion that a gay person might get upset at being called heterosexual raised so why that's coming up here is a mystery.
779:
774:
783:
808:
766:
679:
You may be right -- it just seemed that since the information in the deleted
Fighting Words article ("Fighting Words is a webcomic by Ben Smith that was in Attitude 3") is already in the Attitude article, that a redirect would work.
2280:
Oh please. Both of those are "also-ran" namechecks and nothing more. His viral marketing campaign really is not getting result, perhaps he should hire a new publicist. Or get his kit off on YouTube, that seems to work.
943:
With all due respect, it seems from the above comment that you do not understand the content of the list. The list was for people who stated that they were once homosexual and no longer are. There are people, for example,
1042:
Because I still endorse the deletion. As I stated I view it to be something of a borderline case, where my support is behind the closing admin but I would not oppose relisting. Consider it a "weak ensorse" if you must.
978:) or "Delete per BLP" -- BLP would only require the article to be sourced, which a number of contributors suggested it was). The keepers were outnumbered, but only by a small amount. I don't see consensus, no.
2428:
Actually, WP:MUSIC's relevant criteria is: "Has had a charted hit on any national music chart." That is not well defined... that is to say, what chart(s) qualify as "national music charts", though it does say
2010:
is a reliable source. But now I expect to hear some excuse as to why it's not good enough. I see a lot of excuses popping up as to why this topic must be so vehemently excluded. None of them really justify
2202:
this LA Weekly article (and photo). I realize that he's still borderline in terms of media mentions, but given the buzz (evidenced by over a million Google hits), I think the notability is close enough.
195:
Wait, never mind, I misread your request. I could userfy the page history, but I'm honestly not sure you want it, since it was quite obviously a vandal magnet. Try starting something from scratch first.
1181:
in which he identifies himself as a "former homosexual," which he also states in the book that he wrote (which as far as I know still exists and did not vanish in a poof of fairy dust). Source for
1279:
as 1) no consensus to delete b) no overriding reason to delete without such a consensus. But I wont cry if this says dead. I hate lists - and especially lists by sexuality (or ex-sexuality).--
2176:
It may be worth placing a note on the talk page - I'll do it once I gather links to all the DRV discussions. The frequency this appears on DRV is a reason why deletion is usually endorsed. --
911:
If this was directed at me, I never said that there was an exhaustive or official list of valid reasons. I said that the reasons offered in this nomination were not valid for this AFD.
863:. For this deletion review, please provide links to policy. There might be room for an article on "Notable people whose sexual identification changed overtime prior to their death." --
1987:(the Buzznet article hardly qualifies as a reliable source, it's an ad for the EP) and come back here with it - it could then be restored and/or given a full AFD discussion. However,
2299:
His viral marketing campaign did succeed in getting him a #1 spot on iTunes downloads, for what that's worth. Honestly, I don't care whether or not he has an article. I thought the
585:
It's part of the larger compilation. There's no information about this particular comic, and the previous article had pretty much nothing to build upon. It's a simple solution. --
502:
seems to me that it was just done without much thought - if an article is important enough to be featured in a book about online cartoonists, its importance is not in question. --
1185:, in which he is identified as having transitioned from homosexuality to heterosexuality, which he has also written about in his as-yet-not-turned-to-fairy-dust book. Source for
2015:
to me. Semi-protect I could see. WP:PP is a bit extraordinary for someone who is much closer to notable than, say, my boss or my kid brother or my high school principal. -
552:
443:
2303:
thing was incredibly stupid, but eventually it got to the point where I couldn't deny it's notability. I think JS is getting close to that point, if not already there.
1944:
166:
1177:
to get some idea of the encyclopedic nature of the topic. Second, the sourcing for people's former sexuality does not vanish with the change of sexuality. Source for
1202:
There is no suggestion as far as I can see that any of these individuals have undergone "reparative therapy". Such a claim would certainly require robust sourcing.
1189:
in which he is reported to have given a speech about his "journey...out of homosexuality." The sourcing is there and the encyclopedic nature of the topic is there.
1888:
1878:
2132:
deletion endorsed just a few days ago (see DRV March 24th). Suggest future DRV attempts be speedy-closed: a new DRV every 4 days is disruptive and unreasonable.
1991:
the article until that condition is met. I'm being a little harsher here because that possibility has been brought up a few times, and no one has attempted it. --
181:
small note: In the event it's determined the old history shouldn't be uncovered, please do not delete my subpage, since it won't be posting of recreated content.
1938:
1409:
people who once self-identified as LGBT but later began self-identifying as heterosexual." The wording can be tweaked but it seems relatively unambiguous to me.
1364:
as closer, I think I made an error here (after looking at the debate again, and noting the problems here). Not sure if I should simply undelete this, or not...?
48:
34:
1751:, undeletion in this case should really be accompanied by the presentation of multiple reliable, independent sources that cover the subject non-trivially. --
2064:
That's part of the problem, we're still considering otherwise reliable sources unreliable. But I've led us too far OT already. Just generally frustrated. --
2036:
Repeating general plea for
Knowledge (XXG) to bring their sourcing in line with the 21st century so obviously notable individuals can be covered properly. --
1557:
1547:
43:
2235:
Regardless, if a notable magazine in a major city is making "passing" mentions by name and printing photos of someone, I would argue that they must have
1667:- Unanimous AFDs are usually only overturned/relisted with the presentation of multiple reliable independent sources. This doesn't seem to have that.
770:
1631:
It is for these reasons of interpretation, popularity, and measurable user base that I respectfully request the undeletion of the WikyBlog article.
643:
1080:
The deletion of a list of this nature which is not footnoted to reliable sources on every single name, which this wasn't, should be automatically
762:
720:
428:
39:
2354:
Since when is reaching number 1 in an iTunes chart not notable? And how are MusicEdge and iTunes not reliable sources to attribute to? -
1732:
2117:
and MusicEdge as reliable enough to base an article off. A number one at iTunes is clearly notable and there's sources to back it up. -
385:
380:
123:
118:
389:
127:
480:
Could somebody just tell me what the claim to notability is supposed to be? Only, that looks a lot like a valid A7 speedy to me.
1843:
1838:
175:
This was deleted due to unverifiablity. I'd like to try and develop an article in userspace and then move it to mainspace. See
21:
1847:
414:
372:
152:
110:
834:- no valid reason offered for deletion. Reasons offered were "not encyclopedic" which is pretty meaningless in an AFD debate;
267:
if you can come back with some reliable sources on the topic, might be worth reconsideration. But find some reliable sources
2334:. Without sources that are actually about the subject and aren't just passing mentions, there isn't much of an argument. --
2092:. As with Dr Steel, I think we are being targeted by fans to try to promote a "famous for what?" subject into notability.
1384:
I don't think you can take unilateral action since its now at deletion review. But I'm still on the fence on this one. Per
466:, neutral on a list. The book as a reference certainly gives enough information to constitute notability at this stage. --
1872:
1830:
2410:
types, each with 22 charts (by country). That alone does not convince me that the subject yet meets the requirements of
2394:
1504:
1499:
293:
251:
176:
2464:
2200:
1906:
1809:
1769:
1470:
1426:
745:
699:
351:
311:
89:
17:
1508:
1912:
1118:'Linked in the article' is a smokescreen for endemic poor sourcing and not good enough for lists of this nature. --
1319:"large/unmaintainable list" (the list was being regularly maintained and being large is hardly a reason to delete)
1131:
Fine, so undelete the article and I'll move the sources from the individual articles to the list. Problem solved.
1533:
1491:
2050:
Repeating general comment that being in line with the 21st century does not make unreliable sources reliable. -
2069:
2041:
1335:
975:
874:
Please point me to the official and exhaustive list of Valid
Reasons that you've been perusing. Failing that,
576:
507:
471:
2359:
2122:
193:
It's probably a better idea to come back when your article is written, since your subpage has nothing in it.
840:
2319:
Unfortunately, we don't include things because they are "getting close" to being notable. They have to be
2311:
2272:
2211:
1571:
949:
2065:
2037:
572:
503:
467:
376:
114:
2378:
2113:. Yes, LA Weekly gives him a passing mention and Buzznet is clearly not reliable. But that still leaves
1280:
242:
2451:
2423:
2401:
2381:
2361:
2345:
2314:
2294:
2275:
2253:
2230:
2214:
2187:
2171:
2151:
2124:
2105:
2073:
2059:
2045:
2029:
2002:
1975:
1953:
1931:
1798:
1755:
1739:
1723:
1692:
1671:
1659:
1635:
1459:
1413:
1397:
1379:
1354:
1283:
1262:
1249:
1229:
1215:
1193:
1164:
1135:
1122:
1109:
1092:
1069:
1033:
1016:
982:
961:
934:
915:
902:
867:
847:
734:
684:
674:
650:
634:
612:
596:
580:
566:
537:
511:
493:
475:
458:
340:
300:
280:
255:
230:
207:
186:
78:
1067:
1014:
2441:
2243:
2161:
2019:
1921:
1795:
1119:
1089:
455:
106:
70:
2339:
2224:
2181:
1996:
1653:
1585:
1495:
1322:"Once gay, always gay" (here's one response that comes to mind: <uncivil remark not written: -->
1186:
590:
560:
201:
551:, article consists of two sentences - what it is and that part of it happened to get published in
2355:
2118:
1453:
1174:
879:
2411:
1900:
2419:
2305:
2266:
2205:
2055:
1971:
1834:
1752:
1487:
1447:
1373:
1351:
671:
630:
609:
1385:
1313:
625:
page has been unchanged since May 2006, leading me to conclude that no expansion is likely.
1748:
1668:
1591:
Note as well that, using DidiWiki's approach, the number of hits when searching google for "
681:
647:
247:
2446:
2331:
2324:
2320:
2248:
2166:
2024:
1926:
1645:
1568:
confused it as an "innovative use of
Mediawiki" and not an independently developed project.
1390:
1328:
1324:
1306:
1085:
860:
835:
2438:
2433:
national music chart". So... unless you are saying that the US iTunes dance chart is not "
2240:
2158:
2016:
1918:
1909:
1105:
sourced, either in the article itself or in the linked page to the subject's own article.
452:
276:
2012:
1984:
1624:
1540:
857:
815:
421:
159:
2336:
2221:
2178:
2133:
1993:
1896:
1705:
1650:
667:
587:
557:
448:
368:
332:
198:
1644:, unanimous AFD. Google hits alone are simply a rule of thumb and are not part of the
2289:
2283:
2100:
2094:
1687:
1681:
1632:
1410:
1394:
1259:
1226:
1210:
1204:
1190:
1159:
1153:
1132:
1106:
1030:
958:
912:
864:
844:
532:
526:
488:
482:
225:
219:
183:
2239:
notability. The Weekly determined he was notable enough to showcase in the photo. -
859:
Also, there were three mentions of encyclopedic in the AfD, none of which linked to
2415:
2390:
2300:
2051:
1967:
1950:
1826:
1790:
1366:
731:
626:
337:
289:
75:
1864:
1525:
800:
406:
144:
1891:. That was in September 2005. Since then, Star has released an EP, appeared with
1610:
954:
they write and sell books in which they state flat out that they used to be gay?!
1736:
1246:
1044:
991:
979:
239:
1225:
turning straight is an encyclopedic topic. "Ex-gay" redirects to that article.
1182:
945:
272:
524:
I don't know, I'm still trying to work out the supposed claim to notability.
2389:- passing mentions are still trivial no matter who's doing the mentioning.
2259:
2007:
1903:
1579:
1565:
1178:
1598:
1592:
1101:
The only problem with this statement is that every single name on the list
441:: Article about the webcomic, it was speedily deleted (A7) 5 minutes after
1604:
555:. It's a textbook A7; just put a redirect to that article in its place. --
1983:
yet again; however, you can write a new article in user space that cites
930:
928:
concerns make a list like this unmaintainable. The close was reasonable.
1350:
this discussion because it appeared a clear case of "keep" to me. --
2114:
1299:"just a way to beg for trouble" (so is any biographical information!)
179:- if an admin is willing to move it there, that would be wonderful.
2262:
1574:"doubt it exsist" but did not refer to the links on the article to
1618:
which all have articles on
Wikepedia and have been deemed notable.
1245:
Isn't this a subpage? I thought they were explicitly not allowed.
1389:
statements of membership criteria could be developed to overcome
1346:
I should note that while going over the AFD page for March 21, I
1731:
AfD valid; noone of the above make it notable; also, I only get
1025:
If you don't mind seeing it relisted then maybe you should vote
1892:
1747:. The close by Punkmorten was certainly valid. As noted by
271:, please! Otherwise, there's really nothing to talk about.
763:
List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people/No longer identified
721:
List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people/No longer identified
670:
isn't strong enough that a redirect would be representative.
498:
I'd say that the speedy of this article inconjunction with
2088:. Viral marketing aside, no reliable non-trivial sources
1588:
used a reference to WikyBlog to defend it's own deletion.
1575:
1556:
The article seems to have been deleted because WikyBlog's
1302:"sub-page... in the mainspace" (moving is a solution here)
2219:
That's a passing mention, actually, despite the photo. --
1700:
valid unanimous AfD (and it was even relisted twice, and
1258:
If it is, undelete it and move it from being a sub-page.
1334:"doesn't provide useful imformation" (no different from
238:
to userspace, I think this could get some good sources.
2397:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1521:
1517:
1513:
796:
792:
788:
402:
398:
394:
296:
140:
136:
132:
1341:"susceptible to BLP" (so is all biographical content!)
843:
which is for all intents and purposes the same list.
1945:
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2007 February 22
1679:, valid AfD, no new information. Lack of sources.
288:without prejudice to a good article on the topic.
1939:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2007 March 23
571:How on earth does a redirect make sense here? --
553:Attitude 3: The New Subversive Online Cartoonists
444:Attitude 3: The New Subversive Online Cartoonists
1943:Last full deletion review (links to all prior):
1704:got no support despite being open for 3 weeks!)
2437:national music chart", it would seem to fit. -
74:– continued deletion of old article endorsed –
1309:" (the article and it was rather well-sourced)
878:for the reasons given in the deletion debate.
8:
1808:The following is an archived debate of the
1469:The following is an archived debate of the
744:The following is an archived debate of the
350:The following is an archived debate of the
88:The following is an archived debate of the
1783:
1440:
1296:"not encyclopedic" (vague and unexplained)
713:
325:
63:
1595:" is now around 88,000 in comparison to:
1887:Article was CSD'd under nn-bio after an
644:Attitude: The New Subversive Cartoonists
447:, an anthology that published it by the
2463:The above is an archived debate of the
1768:The above is an archived debate of the
1425:The above is an archived debate of the
698:The above is an archived debate of the
336:– deletion endored, redirect created –
310:The above is an archived debate of the
658:on the deletion/relist issue, but I'm
2332:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball
1966:sources which are really about him. -
1291:per Otto. Deletion reasons included:
7:
1899:, made #1 on the iTunes dance chart
662:to a redirect. The link between the
28:
1735:(not that that's important...)
1584:I find it somewhat ironic that
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1623:Moreover, a google search for
1:
1937:Most recent deletion review:
1627:returns over 27,000 results.
177:User:Miltopia/Wiki vandalism
2258:I found another mention in
2490:
2424:08:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
2402:23:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
2382:09:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
2362:12:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
2346:01:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
2315:22:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2295:22:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2276:21:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2254:21:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2231:19:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2215:17:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2188:20:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2172:20:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2152:13:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2125:11:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2106:09:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2074:02:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2060:02:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2046:02:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2030:15:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
2003:01:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1976:01:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1954:01:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1932:01:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1902:, and been covered by the
1756:20:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1740:18:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1724:13:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1693:09:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1672:06:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1660:03:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1636:02:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1414:06:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
1398:00:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
1380:21:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1355:19:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1284:09:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1263:23:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1250:22:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1230:12:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1216:07:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1194:22:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1165:22:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1136:06:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
1123:17:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1110:22:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1093:21:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1070:23:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1034:21:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1017:20:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
983:18:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
962:21:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
935:17:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
916:21:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
903:15:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
868:14:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
848:14:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
735:12:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
635:08:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
613:20:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
597:01:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
581:23:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
567:22:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
538:06:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
512:23:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
494:22:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
476:21:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
459:20:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
301:23:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
281:00:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
256:14:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
231:06:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
208:01:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
187:23:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2452:05:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
1799:23:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
1558:notability was questioned
1460:09:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
685:20:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
675:19:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
651:00:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
341:03:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
79:03:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
2470:Please do not modify it.
1815:Please do not modify it.
1775:Please do not modify it.
1580:sourceforge project page
1476:Please do not modify it.
1432:Please do not modify it.
751:Please do not modify it.
705:Please do not modify it.
357:Please do not modify it.
317:Please do not modify it.
95:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
1323:(no offense); also see
640:Endorse speedy-deletion
618:Endorse speedy-deletion
2467:of the article above.
1812:of the article above.
1794:– Deletion endorsed –
1772:of the article above.
1572:User:Retiono_Virginian
1473:of the article above.
1451:– Deletion endorsed –
1429:of the article above.
748:of the article above.
730:per original closer –
702:of the article above.
354:of the article above.
314:of the article above.
92:of the article above.
1646:notability guidelines
1625:"powered by wikyblog"
841:List of ex-gay people
453:Dread Lord CyberSkull
2323:and the information
1962:, again. Still no
1175:Reparative therapy
2477:
2476:
2450:
2422:
2400:
2293:
2252:
2170:
2104:
2090:about this person
2072:
2058:
2044:
2028:
1974:
1930:
1782:
1781:
1733:27 google results
1691:
1439:
1438:
1214:
1163:
712:
711:
642:, redirect it to
633:
579:
536:
510:
492:
474:
324:
323:
299:
254:
229:
182:
2481:
2472:
2444:
2418:
2393:
2342:
2309:
2287:
2270:
2246:
2227:
2209:
2184:
2164:
2149:
2146:
2143:
2140:
2130:Endorse deletion
2098:
2068:
2054:
2040:
2022:
1999:
1985:reliable sources
1981:Endorse deletion
1970:
1960:Endorse deletion
1924:
1911:, and MusicEdge
1868:
1850:
1817:
1784:
1777:
1745:Endorse deletion
1729:Endorse deletion
1721:
1718:
1715:
1712:
1698:Endorse deletion
1685:
1677:Endorse deletion
1665:Endorse deletion
1656:
1642:Endorse deletion
1543:
1529:
1511:
1478:
1456:
1441:
1434:
1376:
1369:
1243:Endorse deletion
1208:
1187:Michael Johnston
1157:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1010:
1007:
1004:
1001:
998:
995:
899:
897:
895:
893:
891:
876:endorse deletion
818:
804:
786:
753:
714:
707:
629:
606:Overturn, relist
593:
575:
563:
549:Endorse deletion
530:
506:
486:
470:
424:
410:
392:
359:
326:
319:
292:
261:Endorse deletion
250:
245:
223:
204:
180:
162:
148:
130:
97:
64:
53:
33:
2489:
2488:
2484:
2483:
2482:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2468:
2465:deletion review
2407:Endorse closure
2340:
2307:
2268:
2225:
2207:
2182:
2147:
2144:
2141:
2138:
1997:
1883:
1877:
1871:
1841:
1825:
1813:
1810:deletion review
1796:trialsanderrors
1773:
1770:deletion review
1719:
1716:
1713:
1710:
1654:
1552:
1546:
1539:
1538:
1532:
1502:
1486:
1474:
1471:deletion review
1454:
1430:
1427:deletion review
1378:
1374:
1367:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1008:
1005:
1002:
999:
996:
993:
889:
887:
885:
883:
881:
827:
821:
814:
813:
807:
777:
761:
749:
746:deletion review
703:
700:deletion review
664:Attitude vol. 3
591:
561:
433:
427:
420:
419:
413:
383:
367:
355:
352:deletion review
315:
312:deletion review
279:
243:
202:
171:
165:
158:
157:
151:
121:
105:
93:
90:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2487:
2485:
2475:
2474:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2439:Keith D. Tyler
2404:
2384:
2377:nothing here--
2372:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2241:Keith D. Tyler
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2159:Keith D. Tyler
2134:Andrew Lenahan
2127:
2108:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2066:badlydrawnjeff
2038:badlydrawnjeff
2034:
2033:
2032:
2017:Keith D. Tyler
1978:
1948:
1947:
1941:
1919:Keith D. Tyler
1885:
1884:
1881:
1875:
1869:
1820:
1819:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1780:
1779:
1764:
1763:
1761:
1759:
1758:
1742:
1726:
1706:Andrew Lenahan
1695:
1674:
1662:
1629:
1628:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1611:WikkiTikkiTavi
1608:
1602:
1582:
1569:
1554:
1553:
1550:
1544:
1536:
1530:
1481:
1480:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1437:
1436:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1372:
1358:
1357:
1343:
1342:
1339:
1336:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1332:
1320:
1317:
1310:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1286:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1253:
1252:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1219:
1218:
1197:
1196:
1168:
1167:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1126:
1125:
1113:
1112:
1096:
1095:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1037:
1036:
1020:
1019:
985:
976:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
967:
966:
965:
964:
938:
937:
921:
920:
919:
918:
906:
905:
871:
870:
829:
828:
825:
819:
811:
805:
756:
755:
740:
739:
738:
737:
724:– relisted at
710:
709:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
668:Fighting Words
666:anthology and
637:
615:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
573:badlydrawnjeff
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
517:
516:
515:
514:
504:badlydrawnjeff
478:
468:badlydrawnjeff
461:
435:
434:
431:
425:
417:
411:
369:Fighting Words
362:
361:
346:
345:
344:
343:
333:Fighting Words
322:
321:
306:
305:
304:
303:
283:
275:
258:
233:
210:
173:
172:
169:
163:
155:
149:
107:Wiki vandalism
100:
99:
84:
83:
82:
81:
71:Wiki vandalism
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2486:
2473:
2471:
2466:
2461:
2460:
2453:
2448:
2443:
2440:
2436:
2432:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2413:
2408:
2405:
2403:
2399:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2385:
2383:
2380:
2376:
2373:
2363:
2360:
2357:
2353:
2347:
2344:
2343:
2338:
2333:
2330:, not later.
2329:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2313:
2312:
2310:
2302:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2291:
2286:
2285:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2274:
2273:
2271:
2263:
2261:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2250:
2245:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2229:
2228:
2223:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2213:
2212:
2210:
2201:
2198:
2195:
2189:
2186:
2185:
2180:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2168:
2163:
2160:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2150:
2135:
2131:
2128:
2126:
2123:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2109:
2107:
2102:
2097:
2096:
2091:
2087:
2086:
2081:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2031:
2026:
2021:
2018:
2014:
2009:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2001:
2000:
1995:
1990:
1989:do not unsalt
1986:
1982:
1979:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1952:
1946:
1942:
1940:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1928:
1923:
1920:
1917:
1913:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1901:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1880:
1874:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1849:
1845:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1805:
1800:
1797:
1793:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1778:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1765:
1762:
1757:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1696:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1683:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1634:
1626:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1609:
1606:
1603:
1600:
1597:
1596:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1587:
1583:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1570:
1567:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1559:
1549:
1542:
1535:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1510:
1506:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1466:
1461:
1458:
1457:
1455:Daniel Bryant
1450:
1449:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1435:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1422:
1415:
1412:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1399:
1396:
1393:concerns? --
1392:
1387:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1371:
1370:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1356:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1337:
1333:
1330:
1326:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1311:
1308:
1304:
1301:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1278:
1277:weak overturn
1273:
1270:
1269:
1264:
1261:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1248:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1231:
1228:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1206:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:Richard Cohen
1180:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1155:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1078:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1011:
989:
986:
984:
981:
977:
972:
969:
968:
963:
960:
955:
951:
950:Richard Cohen
947:
942:
941:
940:
939:
936:
933:
932:
926:
923:
922:
917:
914:
910:
909:
908:
907:
904:
901:
900:
877:
873:
872:
869:
866:
862:
858:
855:
852:
851:
850:
849:
846:
842:
837:
833:
824:
817:
810:
802:
798:
794:
790:
785:
781:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
759:
758:
757:
754:
752:
747:
742:
741:
736:
733:
729:
728:
723:
722:
718:
717:
716:
715:
708:
706:
701:
696:
695:
686:
683:
678:
677:
676:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
654:
653:
652:
649:
645:
641:
638:
636:
632:
628:
623:
619:
616:
614:
611:
607:
604:
598:
595:
594:
589:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
565:
564:
559:
554:
550:
547:
546:
539:
534:
529:
528:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
496:
495:
490:
485:
484:
479:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
460:
457:
454:
450:
446:
445:
440:
437:
436:
430:
423:
416:
408:
404:
400:
396:
391:
387:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
358:
353:
348:
347:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
320:
318:
313:
308:
307:
302:
298:
295:
291:
287:
284:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
259:
257:
253:
249:
246:
241:
237:
234:
232:
227:
222:
221:
215:
211:
209:
206:
205:
200:
194:
191:
190:
189:
188:
185:
184:Milto LOL pia
178:
168:
161:
154:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
96:
91:
86:
85:
80:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
59:27 March 2007
57:
50:
49:2007 March 28
45:
41:
36:
35:2007 March 26
23:
19:
2469:
2462:
2434:
2430:
2406:
2386:
2374:
2335:
2327:
2325:attributable
2304:
2301:Lonelygirl15
2282:
2265:
2236:
2220:
2204:
2196:
2177:
2137:
2129:
2110:
2093:
2089:
2084:
2082:
1992:
1988:
1980:
1963:
1959:
1949:
1915:
1886:
1827:Jeffree Star
1814:
1807:
1791:Jeffree Star
1789:
1774:
1767:
1760:
1753:Black Falcon
1744:
1728:
1709:
1701:
1697:
1680:
1676:
1664:
1649:
1641:
1630:
1576:WikyBlog.com
1555:
1475:
1468:
1452:
1446:
1431:
1424:
1365:
1361:
1352:Black Falcon
1348:skipped over
1347:
1288:
1276:
1271:
1242:
1203:
1173:First, read
1152:
1148:
1120:Sam Blanning
1102:
1090:Sam Blanning
1081:
1045:
1026:
992:
987:
970:
953:
929:
924:
880:
875:
853:
831:
830:
750:
743:
725:
719:
704:
697:
672:Epameinondas
663:
659:
655:
639:
621:
617:
610:Black Falcon
605:
586:
556:
548:
525:
499:
481:
463:
442:
438:
356:
349:
331:
316:
309:
285:
268:
264:
260:
235:
218:
213:
197:
192:
174:
94:
87:
69:
58:
1749:Wickethewok
1669:Wickethewok
1329:WP:NOT#SOAP
1066:•
682:Dragonfiend
648:Dragonfiend
1908:, Buzznet
1179:John Paulk
946:John Paulk
500:Attitude 3
449:same admin
44:2007 March
2260:Slate.com
2085:yet again
2008:LA Weekly
1904:LA Weekly
1601:(30,000),
1566:User:Kesh
1316:" (huh??)
1029:instead?
263:for now,
217:article.
2412:WP:MUSIC
2308:itsJamie
2269:itsJamie
2208:itsJamie
2197:Overturn
2111:Overturn
2083:Endorse
1964:reliable
1916:Overturn
1633:Oyejorge
1613:(34,000)
1607:(46,500)
1599:DidiWiki
1593:WikyBlog
1586:DidiWiki
1578:and the
1488:WikyBlog
1448:WikyBlog
1411:Otto4711
1395:Jreferee
1386:WP:LIST,
1375:(o rly?)
1362:Overturn
1289:Overturn
1260:Otto4711
1227:Otto4711
1191:Otto4711
1133:Otto4711
1107:Otto4711
1082:endorsed
1031:Otto4711
971:Overturn
959:Otto4711
913:Otto4711
865:Jreferee
845:Otto4711
832:Overturn
464:Overturn
439:Overturn
252:contribs
20: |
2416:Rossami
2387:Endorse
2375:Endorse
2321:notable
2052:Amarkov
1968:Amarkov
1951:GRBerry
1897:Godhead
1873:restore
1844:protect
1839:history
1605:WiClear
1534:restore
1505:protect
1500:history
1368:Majorly
1314:WP:NPOV
1149:Endorse
988:Endorse
925:endorse
854:Comment
809:restore
780:protect
775:history
732:GRBerry
660:opposed
656:Neutral
627:Rossami
620:. The
415:restore
386:protect
381:history
338:GRBerry
286:Endorse
236:Restore
153:restore
124:protect
119:history
76:GRBerry
2420:(talk)
2395:cheese
2115:iTunes
1848:delete
1737:JulesH
1509:delete
1391:WP:BLP
1325:WP:NOR
1307:WP:ATT
1272:Yikes!
1247:JuJube
1086:WP:BLP
1027:relist
980:JulesH
861:WP:NOT
836:WP:BLP
784:delete
631:(talk)
622:entire
390:delete
294:cheese
214:highly
212:It is
128:delete
2398:whine
2391:Chris
2341:desat
2290:Help!
2226:desat
2183:desat
2101:Help!
2013:WP:PP
1998:desat
1865:views
1857:watch
1853:links
1702:still
1688:Help!
1655:desat
1564:User
1541:cache
1526:views
1518:watch
1514:links
1211:Help!
1160:Help!
882:: -->
816:cache
801:views
793:watch
789:links
592:desat
562:desat
533:Help!
489:Help!
422:cache
407:views
399:watch
395:links
297:whine
290:Chris
273:Xtifr
269:first
226:Help!
203:desat
160:cache
145:views
137:watch
133:links
52:: -->
16:<
2337:Core
2306:OhNo
2267:OhNo
2237:some
2222:Core
2206:OhNo
2199:per
2179:Core
2070:talk
2056:moo!
2042:talk
1994:Core
1972:moo!
1895:and
1861:logs
1835:talk
1831:edit
1651:Core
1648:. --
1522:logs
1496:talk
1492:edit
1327:and
1088:. --
1084:per
948:and
898:<
797:logs
771:talk
767:edit
646:. --
588:Core
577:talk
558:Core
508:talk
472:talk
403:logs
377:talk
373:edit
277:tälk
199:Core
141:logs
115:talk
111:edit
32:<
2447:AMA
2435:any
2431:any
2414:.
2379:Doc
2356:Mgm
2328:now
2284:Guy
2249:AMA
2167:AMA
2145:bli
2119:Mgm
2095:Guy
2025:AMA
1927:AMA
1893:AFI
1889:afd
1879:AfD
1717:bli
1682:Guy
1560:.
1548:AfD
1281:Doc
1205:Guy
1154:Guy
1103:was
931:DGG
823:AfD
727:AFD
527:Guy
483:Guy
429:AfD
265:but
248:g92
220:Guy
167:AfD
22:Log
2264:.
2148:nd
2142:ar
2139:St
2136:-
1914:.
1863:|
1859:|
1855:|
1851:|
1846:|
1842:|
1837:|
1833:|
1720:nd
1714:ar
1711:St
1708:-
1524:|
1520:|
1516:|
1512:|
1507:|
1503:|
1498:|
1494:|
1013:•
799:|
795:|
791:|
787:|
782:|
778:|
773:|
769:|
680:--
456:✎☠
451:.
405:|
401:|
397:|
393:|
388:|
384:|
379:|
375:|
240:Ab
196:--
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
42::
2449:)
2445:(
2442:¶
2429:"
2358:|
2292:)
2288:(
2251:)
2247:(
2244:¶
2169:)
2165:(
2162:¶
2121:|
2103:)
2099:(
2027:)
2023:(
2020:¶
1929:)
1925:(
1922:¶
1882:)
1876:|
1870:(
1867:)
1829:(
1690:)
1686:(
1551:)
1545:|
1537:|
1531:(
1528:)
1490:(
1338:)
1331:)
1312:"
1305:"
1213:)
1209:(
1162:)
1158:(
1062:n
1059:a
1056:y
1053:k
1050:r
1047:A
1009:n
1006:a
1003:y
1000:k
997:r
994:A
896:t
894:n
892:a
890:i
888:d
886:a
884:R
826:)
820:|
812:|
806:(
803:)
765:(
535:)
531:(
491:)
487:(
432:)
426:|
418:|
412:(
409:)
371:(
244:e
228:)
224:(
170:)
164:|
156:|
150:(
147:)
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.