Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2008 January 9

3013:: Userboxes are 7/8ths superfluous. If we were to keep our opinions to ourselves, wikipedia would have few articles indeed. (EDIT:) Has this been a source of confrontation before, besides here? There are many more userboxes, albeit less confrontational, that could create just as much confrontation; maybe not in talk pages, but in general opinions of others. If we're to assume good faith, please assume that my userbox is in no way trying to be confrontational. It seems a given to me that, unless a user is espousing their views vehemently elsewhere, the confrontation is in the direction of the holder of the box, putting 1392:- One AFD says keep. The other AFD says that the company is not notable, the software might be, but is deleted anyway? Stop arguing the toss over semantics, if the software is notable, then its fine to detail it on an article on the company. There are multiple sources on this on Google News, even when ignoring the press releases. The behaviour of company employees does not do a thing to change the guidelines and policies on Knowledge (XXG), guidelines and policies that attask(software/company/whatever) passes. - 2024:"to enforce consensus". G4 only applies if the article were actually deleted and recreated, which is not the case here. Closer then sets stringent conditions if editors want to fix the issues raised in the AfD, by requiring the article be listed here for these improvements to be reviewed, before they can be implemented. That is not an acceptable process. Non-withstanding administrative discretion, I feel the closer has shown some bias in closing the AfD. 3085:

creation of an encyclopedia. I suggest that that claim needs to be examined. Specifically, I believe allowing users to display userboxes not directly related to encyclopedia work, even controversial ones, does in fact help in the creation of the encyclopedia, because it helps keep the people who post those userboxes happy. Happy editors are better editors; hell, unhappy editors sometimes become departing editors, thereafter contributing nothing.

2906:

sides, but you have to be consistent in that case. Just mind reading here, but perhaps you think "support the troops" isn't an aggressive or non-peaceful statement (the userbox even has a guy with a gun on it, compared to a flag on mine). But if non-aggressive and pro-peace is what you consider acceptable, then I think you'd have to agree that they should both be replaced with something like "I support minimum casualties in Iraq". --

472:– Product undeleted, company left deleted. From a brief inspection, AtTask seems like the better-written draft, but I am undeleting both for the purpose of a redirect and should consensus determine the other is the more appropriate title. Given that the product has the same name as the company, if later examination determines that company is indeed notable, there seems no reason not to detail both in the same article. – 1554:

commercial - shoot on sight. There should be no question that someone who claims to have a "famous movie studio" and has exactly 2 Google hits - both their Myspace page - they get nuked. Ban users who promulgate such garbage for a significant period of time. They need to be encouraged to avoid the temptation to recreate their article, thereby raising the level of damage and wasted time they incur.

288:

Lunavelis has also opened for Grammy Award Winners, Ok Go. They're gradually gaining popularity amongst the college age demographic receiving notable airtime on numerous midwest radio stations as well as Cleveland's primary alternative rock radio station 92.3FM KROCK. I think it would be beneficial for Lunavelis' fans to have access to a Lunavelis wiki page to learn more about the band.

3157:? Except in this case it is the "good" Tibet fighting against the "evil" china... ? The userbox in question is only causing controversy because people are forgetting that this is an international project, we must maintain a neutral point of view. In wikipedia's view on the war in iraq, America is not the "good guys" and the Iraqies are not the "Bad guys". Restore Userbox. 2885: 3234:. My action was designed (unsuccessfully with hindsight) to nip the drama in the bud. There is no way in hell that template enhances a collaborative environment and collegial spirit. And if the user was interested in such things he would not be contesting this deletion. The creator cannot fail to know that this is controversial and provocative. -- 658:. This is factually false. "Two AFDs" would imply they were both "delete" but only one was; the other was a clear keep. The eight deletions are between 2 different pages, 4 of which were in February and were overturned by the AFD. The last deletion of @task was, in my opinion, an unfair attack on good-faith efforts by the author of the page to 3139:

slippery slope, leading eventually to the deletion of userboxes such as "This user supports recycling" by admins who view them as "divisive and inflammatory" (I am not making this up; such a deletion actually occurred in the past). Whether this userbox is appropriate or not should be determined by community consensus at MfD.

2967:. Userpages are a nice little add-on to the encyclopedia for users to express non-controversial information which won't disrupt meeting our main goal - writing an encyclopedia. The same rules apply to things which are used on userpages only (ie. userboxes). Therefore, I see no fault in the rationale in Doc's deletion. 3119:. In case it wasn't apparent above. I think that until all arguments about both whether potentially divisive userboxes hurt the project and whether, if so, any political boxes should be allowed, are settled, it's inappropriate to delete anything from the userspace unless there are serious legal implications. 3211:. Arbitrary deletion with no discussion. Most userboxes are useless IMO and are annoying to some people. If it were up to me, I'd delete them all. ;-) But deleting some politically incorrect infoboxes while keeping others is even worse than doing nothing and letting people troll freely in their userpages. -- 3100:

For the record: (1) I suppose I'm not unbiased – I posted this very userbox on my own page the day before it went up for deletion; (2) I do mind that the community as a whole seems to tolerate certain highly opinionated boxes but not others, but I admit that's not directly germane to this proceeding.

2718:

Good faith non-admin closure as keep/nomination withdrawn by nominator who changed their mind. The debate was not non-controversial, though, as another editor !voted for deletion. From a review of the discussion comments, I feel it is likely that a different outcome would be possible if the AFD ran

1629:

Brad said that 17 months ago, and we have not lost the battle. During that 16 months, probably tens of thousands of spam articles have been removed, an equal number kept from even starting--and perhaps a similar number, contributed by people with COI, have enriched the encyclopedia. The spam fighters

1549:

The volume of corporate vanity/vandalism which is showing up on Knowledge (XXG) is overwhelming. At the office, we are receiving dozens of phone calls *per week* about company, organization, and marketing edits which are reverted, causing the non-notable, but self-aggrandizing authors, to scream

1457:

the product article. I was one of the people who did a lot of the leg work on the last AfD. There are two issues. One is the product, one is the company behind the product. The sources that have been found can establish notability and verifiability of the software product. Period. Full Stop. I helped

3243:

I've often seen "preventing drama" cited as the justification for arbitrary administrative actions. However, in my experience, such actions almost always cause more drama than they seek to prevent. Yes, I can see that there are various sound arguments for deleting the userbox - but if you want to do

3138:

and take to MfD. Deleting admin did not cite a valid CSD criterion. Userboxes cannot be deleted because one admin subjectively views them as "disruptive"; this would only have been appropriate if the userbox attacked another editor personally (in which case it would have fallen under G10). This is a

3088:

I'm not suggesting that this is obviously correct. I'm suggesting that, before accepting a claim that the box in question disrupts the project, you examine it. Is there evidence of controversy arising from this or any similar userbox disrupting directly the creation of any mainspace page? If not,

3049:

It's not an excuse, but it brings up a bigger question about statements of support for any side of the war. Since the consensus on my userbox is becoming clear, a wider discussion needs to open up about all statements of support for any side in the Iraq war, so I'd like to insist that one be opened.

1368:

The amount of abuse, spam and recreations from this company is on a staggering level. No offence to Renesis' good inentions but this has gone beyond the cusp of acceptable, and creates significant doubt as to whether any of AtTask, Inc's on-wiki activities are conducted in good faith. Not even going

670:

This article was brief and not as sourced as the previous article, so I decided to work on it to make the text more neutral and add third party sources. Today, Hu12 has deleted this article as "recreation of deleted material" (which it clearly was not, as any admin can see from the page histories),

1462:

to creating an article about the product. The article he initially created was a bit rah, rah but did the sources justice and was a pretty decent start-class article. I stand by my statements that At Task, Inc has no notability as notability is not inherited. The product should have an article. The

3467:

I translated this article from Japanese wikipedia. Reason is this expression sounds like English, but it is NOT. Often it is confusing. So it is NOT correct English (this is the whole reason I translated.) I tried to contact admin, but my comment is deleted for some reason. I appreciate if anybody

2437:

states "If the article(s) contain little content, consider merging or redirecting them into another article". While the episode is notable and real-world information is easy to find, the WikiProject (which I am a part of, but have no intentions to fix the articles because I have given priority to

2162:

opinions made during the AfD were not strongly grounded in policy. There do not appear to be sufficient reliable third party sources about this particular episode for it to warrant an article. That problem was not satisfactorily rebutted by those wishing to keep the article. Knowledge (XXG) should

2096:

some of the keeps didn't have a policy based reason for keeping the article. Others voted speedy keep because it's was recommended for editors not to list espisote articles in AFD, which isn't a valid reason for keeping, as any article that doesn't meet wikipedia policies can be nominated for AFD.

1557:

Some of you might think regular policy and VfD is the way to go. I am here to tell you it is not enough. We are losing the battle for encyclopedic content in favor of people intent on hijacking Knowledge (XXG) for their own memes. This scourge is a serious waste of time and energy. We must

1507:

the article on the product. the latest version at @restore seems adequately sourced COI of the editor is no reason to delete an article. I'm not considering now whether the company itself deserves an article --if it has only onemajor product , probably it does not. Perhaps the great importance of

662:

with the most recent AFD. I felt the titles should be unprotected to allow an appropriate article to be created about the product as mentioned in the AFD. I attempted to contact Hu12 over this issue but my arguments would not be listened to, and I did not want a wheel war, so I decide to let the

119:

The page for this single is completely false. Nothing has ever been said by the band about this song being a single, the cover submitted for it was a fan made creation combining Nightwish's logo, Within Temptation's Album Artwork and Evanescence's font. The song had been said to never be performed

3084:

I think there's more of a defense here than that equivalent userboxes supporting the other side, or supporting equivalently divisive positions in other arguments, are allowed to remain. Those who favor deletion of controversial, soapboxy userboxes seem always to posit that they don't help in the

2905:

Well apparently my defense wasn't as obvious as I'd thought. It doesn't make sense to me for it to be alright to express support the forces on one side of a conflict, but disruptive to express support for the opposing forces. I understand the argument that Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to take

287:

Lunavelis is a real alternative-rock band from Cleveland, OH. I am unsure as to why their page was deleted in the first place as they are a legitimate band. Currently signed to the Arp Media Record Label while releasing a full-length album which is available on iTunes and throughout the internet.

2854:

This userbox was an alternative to the "support the troops" and "stable Iraq" boxes. It was deleted without notice with the comment "This is disruptive, liable to cause drama, and unhelpful to the project. Please do not recreate it. Thanks.". And yes, I am a bit steamed at the removal of the box

1789:

The article was closed as a non-admin keep even though only a very limited number of editors participated. I rebutted the discussion about the sources, and the other delete and the two keeps had not one policy based reason, saying only that the league exists and that it's "obvious". This debate,

708:) who is the AtTask, Inc. CEO and is responsible for at lest five (5) of the recreations. There is quite alot of history behind AtTask, Inc's promotional use of Knowledge (XXG), Just about every concievable violation and sneaky method in an attempt for inclusion has been used in this case. see 1553:

We are the #14 website in the world. We are a big target. If we are to remain true to our encyclopedic mission, this kind of nonsense cannot be tolerated. This means the administrators and new page patrol need to be clear when they see new usernames and page creation which are blatantly

2182:

to the extent that it clearly ended as a variation of "keep". Whether the page should be kept as an independent article or turned into a redirect is an ordinary editing decision to be made by consensus. That discussion should certainly consider the opinions and evidence presented in the AFD

2474:

AFD can return two verdicts - delete and not-delete. (Not-delete is generally referred to as keep, no consensus, or some other term.) If the AFD returns not-delete, then editors can continue to take normal editorial actions, like merging, redirecting, trimming, adding content, etc. Therefore

2183:

discussion (and now here) but that part of the AFD is no more binding than an equivalently attended discussion on the Talk page. Unlike deletion, reverting a redirect requires no special admin powers or capabilities. Sort the rest of the decision on the respective article Talk pages.

2097:

Edokter rebuttal of Uncle G, who is one of the most knowledgeable editors on wikipedia policies is wrong as well, as watching the espisote yourself isn't a third party source. Closer made the correct call. As for the redirect protection, that's something that doesn't need DRV for.

2054:

I unprotected the redirect as clearly premature. We don't preemptively protect articles or redirects. This is not an invitation to revert the closure (on which I don't have an opinion yet), but to allow good-faith editors to fix the problems that came up in the discussion. ~

2299:

Very well then, I'll just tell you: Reprotecting for other reasons then edit-warring and vandalism will be considered wheelwarring. I do not have to tell you what the consequences are. Further more, do not make unsubstansiated accusations; I consider that a personal attack.

1527:. While its nice to think one or two "support/overturn/recreate" posts in an AFD or Deletion review about which of the 4-5-6 versions of this companies "self created advertisments" is sutible for inclusion, the fact remains this is an encyclopedia and Knowledge (XXG) is 1417:, since (admins correct me if I'm wrong here) the 'copies' were probably not "substantially identical to the deleted version". Because of this, the better of the two (I'm assuming the product article) should be restored and all other titles redirected to it. Also, 1550:

bloody murder. This is as it should be. However, I am issuing a call to arms to the community to act in a much more draconian fashion in response to corporate self-editing and vanity page creation. This is simply out of hand, and we need your help.

1780: 2869:

Yup it is very difficult to assume good faith here, but let me try. I'm all for free-speech (and not that's it relevant I don't support the Iraq dfisasco) but I am dead against trolling. So, I'll post the deleted userbox here, and say no

1603:. There are several editors (including those from the company) who are willing to be sure that the text of the article does not violate Knowledge (XXG)'s policy for "promotion and advertising". The nice quote above does not apply to 1412:

best version of the product's article, at whatever title is most likely to be searched for. The two AfDs for the first article about the company look fine to me. I don't think that the latter two articles qualified for

815: 2076:

is a notable enough TV series to assume that a policy-compliant article (or section in the "Episodes" article) can be created. For that, the edit history is still available for anyone who wants to take on the task. ~

2938:

Iraqis can do whatever they feel like doing, but that doesn't mean you need to shout that out on your userpage. Userboxes about (military) conflicts are frequently contentious and have no place on WP because they

2326:

Threats don't work well with me, sorry. Please stop being hypocritical - you made an unsubstansiated accusation that I was biased, but now you claim that you consider them personal attacks? I'm terribly confused.

1902:– Close as moot and article restored. The article has been re-written. Although consensus exists that a redirect was initially a reasonable result of the AfD, preemptive protection was not (as can be seen from a 389:. There are many, many indie bands in the world with a MySpace page and an upcoming album, but Knowledge (XXG) consensus is that generally it is not appropriate for them to have an article in the encyclopedia. -- 1737: 1732: 1741: 675:(the company) is overturned, but I think the titles should be unprotected so that the article about the product (which is clearly notable) can be written by the editors wishing to contribute to the topic. 1766: 1724: 671:

and protected the title. I feel that the only way we can resolve the protection issue is here at DRV, so I am posting it for the communities consideration. I don't really care whether the deletion of

3180:

meant to disrupt (which is quite a high bar to reach) or openly attack someone (G10 etc.) proper process should be followed. Which in this case means a MfD. This way far less Wikidrama is caused.

3176:

We are once more on a slippery slope here. Community consensus is that userboxes are tolerated, even if they hold controversial views. T1 does explicitly not cover userspace. So unless the box is

2003: 740: 639: 595: 1808:. I don't see enough discussion there for me to be comfortable with any closure of it. Relist for more discussion. Also, the nonadmin closure doesn't appear unambiguous enough to match 626:

who said "asserts notability and is cited. if notability is contested, please take to afd" at which point Hu12 marked it as recreation of deleted material with a link to the spam report.

3244:

that, take it to MfD and let the community decide. CSD is for things that obviously and uncontroversially need to be deleted straight away; MfD is for handling controversial deletions.

81: 2831: 2558:

in light of the above. There isn't much question as to whether the episode is notable, and verifiability isn't really an obstacle at this point, especially given materials like

709: 1728: 807: 2121:

made the right call unprotecting it, as G4 has nothing to do with page protection. None of the keep !votes cited policy or gave stunning arguements for keeping, and the

1463:

company should not. I am more than willing to watchlist an article about the product to keep it on the straight and narrow even with my limited time here on WP nowadays.

622:, about the product, instead of the company, according to the suggestion of the AFD. It was marked for speedy deletion as an advertisement, but that was reviewed by 51: 1720: 1675: 3487: 3359: 3289:

So, is it a good use of our human resources that every time someone creates a trollbox we have a five day discussion to decide whether to uncreate it? No thanks.--

37: 2845: 2709: 46: 602:

had worked to improve the article (with possible COI but it seems like this user was working hard to be neutral). The result of the discussion this time was

3253:

If there are good arguments for keeping it as helpful, please make them. I will back off. If not, why vote to undelete it? Is it just for process reasons?--

1960: 1955: 1205: 763: 2806: 1964: 629:

All this may be questionable to some degree but still procedure. However, at this point, Hu12 added the articles to protected titles with the message:

2357:

Well, it looks as if consensus considers what Edokter had to say as being incorrect. I'll take the high ground given to me by that and drop it, then.

1508:

the wholly legitimate concerns of those fighting spammers have caused them to lose perspective of what is our primary goal, building an encyclopedia.

1138: 1013: 736: 635: 591: 2531: 1989: 1947: 1274: 899: 3230:

This userbox was not sitting quietly in userspace when the big bad admin came along and started TEH DRAMA. It had already offended one user and

2255:

Please don't put too much drama in the situation. My biggest problem was the pre-emptive protection to force an outcome, something that should

2797: 2761: 1083: 803: 1533: 1199: 1370: 42: 2072:

other than the protection and the overly stringent requirements to improve the article. As it was, the article failed our policies, but

957: 587: 569: 811: 3458: 1331: 1132: 1007: 278: 131: 2462: 3035:(err...just out of curiosity, do only admins vote in these? I'm the only standard member. Oops if so, and disregard what I'd said) 1268: 893: 855: 526: 521: 2434: 787: 783: 21: 2666: 2661: 779: 760: 530: 2430: 827: 3502: 3415: 3410: 2670: 2572: 2141: 1859: 1824: 1440: 1077: 331: 2814: 1599:

Hu12, the fact is that your vigilence in fighting spam (to be respected, for sure) still does not overturn policy regarding

1223: 3419: 2519: 2259:

been done. And unless there is clear vandalism or edit-warring, I advice not to reach for the protect button too hastily.

1567: 555: 513: 354:. There was not a single assertion that Lunavelis meets any of the criteria, so speedy deleting the article was valid per 235: 230: 2439: 1543: 1156: 1031: 2695: 2653: 1951: 1241: 951: 767: 705: 239: 3518: 3381: 3333: 3154: 2948: 2921: 2780: 2740: 2632: 2588: 1926: 1877: 1703: 1654: 775: 771: 492: 447: 201: 156: 104: 17: 3444: 3402: 2726: 2342: 2341:

The two of you, knock it off. If you don't have anything sensible or relevant to say, then don't say anything at all.

1325: 583: 374: 135: 2943:

help collaboration in any way (you want something collaborative - try "This user is interested in Iraq") while they

3089:

then we're just talking about relative unhappiness here, and to that effect I submit that those who post userboxes

1174: 1049: 264: 222: 835: 831: 2202: 2082: 2060: 1688: 839: 1298: 923: 614:(the article seemed to be adequately sourced and the company/prdocut covered by third parties). At this time, 2129:

sets forth anyways, since it contained almost nothing besides a plot summary. Closer made the right call. --

1193: 851: 130:

If you feel that an article should be deleted, you can nominate it for deletion. How to do so is explained at

2559: 304: 2535: 2285:

Please don't try to advise my course of action when you have a clear conflict of interest in the situation.

2211:

That's true. The second paragraph of the closer's comments had no basis in policy and is not sustainable.

1943: 1898: 1280: 1001: 905: 307:

or something similar to show what content you plan to recreate the article with. If you do so, please read

847: 843: 362: 3184: 1911: 1575: 1286: 1126: 1107: 911: 887: 477: 186: 76: 1188: 3507: 3477: 3370: 3316: 3307: 3293: 3280: 3257: 3248: 3238: 3220: 3201: 3166: 3143: 3128: 3110: 3078: 3059: 3026: 3005: 2991: 2975: 2959: 2928: 2915: 2874: 2864: 2769: 2730: 2621: 2577: 2550: 2496: 2469: 2456: 2422: 2392: 2366: 2352: 2336: 2321: 2294: 2280: 2250: 2220: 2206: 2192: 2174: 2146: 2101: 2086: 2064: 2045: 1915: 1906:

editor fixing the concerns, which would not have been possible had the article not been unprotected). –

1864: 1829: 1798: 1692: 1641: 1620: 1593: 1519: 1499: 1477: 1445: 1404: 1382: 1089: 684: 654: 481: 436: 419: 398: 336: 297: 190: 145: 124: 93: 1121: 996: 517: 2999:: There's no way in hell this userbox will help build a collaborative environment or an encyclopedia. 3406: 3074: 2198: 2118: 2078: 2056: 1840: 1684: 1319: 1262: 1095: 981: 415: 2126: 1680: 795: 226: 3040: 3022: 2237:

and accused me of "bias" (if I had any bias, I wouldn't have closed the discussion), and note that

2170: 1355: 963: 289: 121: 747: 691: 667: 509: 468: 3498: 3124: 3106: 2137: 1855: 1820: 1436: 1337: 1071: 969: 695: 594:

after a contested speedy deletion, with a result of keep. Sometime in November/December, it was

327: 293: 3398: 3354: 1217: 407: 386: 351: 308: 3469: 3017:

Unless evidence exists elsewhere and in reasonable numbers, this seems to me a very bad idea.

218: 177: 3366: 3194: 2955: 2947:

inflame passions. By the way, a preemptive troutslap to anyone who trys to invoke meaningless

2617: 2513: 2415: 2314: 2273: 2216: 2188: 2038: 1907: 1616: 1343: 1150: 1025: 680: 473: 394: 182: 89: 2855:

expressing the side unfavored by admin, and only manage to assume good faith with difficulty.

2765:– Restored - since permitting trolling is obviously less disruptive that breaching process – 2523: 2480: 2479:

a non-delete closure. DRV has no further jurisdiction - if the page is improperly protected,

1903: 3313: 3290: 3254: 3235: 3162: 3055: 2925: 2911: 2892: 2871: 2860: 2766: 2657: 2492: 2448: 2362: 2332: 2290: 2246: 945: 699: 432: 3066: 2234: 2021: 1809: 1425: 1414: 751: 732: 721: 355: 316: 3245: 3140: 3070: 2388: 1396: 411: 370: 3451: 2838: 2702: 2484: 2125:

issue was never addressed. It doesn't look like the ariticle made the requirements that

1996: 1773: 562: 271: 1229: 3473: 3303: 3216: 3036: 3018: 2165: 1589: 1378: 650: 623: 2122: 1609:

received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

1162: 1037: 347: 312: 3491: 3276: 3120: 3102: 3001: 2563: 2130: 1848: 1813: 1637: 1515: 1494: 1488: 1483: 1459: 1429: 1418: 1401: 1393: 615: 599: 320: 3363: 3181: 2952: 2614: 2543: 2509: 2404: 2303: 2262: 2212: 2184: 2027: 1612: 1471: 676: 390: 85: 3436: 2687: 1981: 1758: 547: 256: 3158: 3051: 2969: 2907: 2856: 2649: 2609: 2488: 2358: 2328: 2286: 2242: 2155: 2110: 2098: 1795: 428: 2988: 2721: 2483:

it, and if there is a consensus that the redirect should be a full page, then

2384: 2347: 366: 140: 2433:. Had I known about the AfD, I would have voted for redirection because the 3299: 3212: 1585: 1374: 646: 346:. I'm sure the band is real and legitimate. What matters is whether they're 859: 799: 2884: 791: 3271: 1632: 1510: 2241:

is why I protected the redirect. If it happens again, I'm reprotecting.

1465: 3298:

How about not deleting it in the first place and letting people be? --

3269:

Not sufficiently inflammatory to warrant immediate unilateral action.

3093:

are probably more affected by them than those who might be offended,

2163:

not collect plot summaries for every episode of a notable TV series.

728: 672: 631: 579: 2429:

It would be appreciated if someone could have left a notice on the

1256: 881: 717: 643: 619: 2442:) has failed to demonstrate that they can save the article, so I 2233:

as the closer, register my disappointment that the nominator has

863: 710:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2007_Archive_Dec_1#AtTask.2C_Inc.

2508:

This DRV is apparently moot as the article has been restored by

1065: 2527: 1540: 634:

repeatidly recreated. Eight deletions total including two Afds

741:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/AtTask (2nd nomination)

640:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/AtTask (2nd nomination)

315:. Also, judging by your username, you may also want to read 134:. This is not the place to nominate an article for deletion. 2383:

Delete redirect. Isn't there a page on this episode anyway?

1564:-Brad Patrick User:BradPatrick Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 939: 1537:". Long after this discussion, the promotion will continue. 1313: 82:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Master Passion Greed

3065:

Feel free to nominate any userbox you find disruptive at

2020:. Closer also pre-emtively protected the redirect under 1630:

must continue to be carefully aware of the distinction.

1235: 578:

This is a strange DRV and a long story, but here goes.

3432: 3428: 3424: 3231: 2822: 2818: 2810: 2802: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2539: 2238: 2114: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1361: 1349: 1304: 1292: 1247: 1211: 1180: 1144: 1113: 1101: 1055: 1019: 987: 975: 929: 917: 823: 819: 543: 539: 535: 252: 248: 244: 2197:

Under the requirements set up by the closer it did. ~

1847:, as the reason for the nom doesn't exist anymore. -- 1168: 1043: 1679:– Non-admin closure overturned, article deleted per 350:. The notability criteria for bands are outlined in 3095:but do not have to visit the userpages in question 2924:isn't a good reason to let you troll with this.-- 427:and incorporate Lifebaka's message by reference. 2526:and the inclusion of reviews by Robert Canning ( 935:Nate Bowler, chief technology officer for AtTask 666:A few days ago, I noticed a new page created at 590:. This page has a fairly long history, and was 1721:National Professional Basketball League (2007-) 1676:National Professional Basketball League (2007-) 1428:issues: they are not a reason for deletion. -- 8: 2890:This user recognizes the right of Iraqis to 1790:becuase of the lack of discussion should be 737:Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/AtTask 636:Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/AtTask 586:company and was one of the listed titles on 80:– Listed in wrong place - moved to AFD, see 3380:The following is an archived debate of the 2779:The following is an archived debate of the 2631:The following is an archived debate of the 1925:The following is an archived debate of the 1702:The following is an archived debate of the 491:The following is an archived debate of the 200:The following is an archived debate of the 103:The following is an archived debate of the 3358:– Speedy closed. Discusssion already open 3347: 2754: 2602: 1891: 1668: 461: 170: 69: 41: 1369:to attempt to cite the laundry list of 50: 2613:– Just re-nominate it for AfD then. – 592:reviewed for deletion back in February 33: 2798:User:MQDuck/userboxes/Right To Resist 2762:User:MQDuck/userboxes/Right To Resist 1810:the deleltion process guidlines on it 132:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 2879: 3521:of the page listed in the heading. 3336:of the page listed in the heading. 2743:of the page listed in the heading. 2591:of the page listed in the heading. 1880:of the page listed in the heading. 1657:of the page listed in the heading. 606:, with most users stating that the 588:list of project management software 450:of the page listed in the heading. 159:of the page listed in the heading. 2440:other WikiProject that I belong to 2016:while consensus clearly indicates 1839:Nevermind, closure was changed by 582:was originally an article about a 303:I suggest you create a subpage at 28: 3155:User:Neutralhomer/Userboxes/Tibet 1371:policy & guideline violations 2883: 1482:No opinion on the articles, but 406:, no indication that band meets 385:, as Aecis said, have a read of 3517:The above is an archive of the 3332:The above is an archive of the 2739:The above is an archive of the 2587:The above is an archive of the 1876:The above is an archive of the 1653:The above is an archive of the 446:The above is an archive of the 155:The above is an archive of the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review 1: 3153:how is this any different to 2435:television episodes guideline 2115:last revision before redirect 655:21:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 30: 3015:the holder in the defensive. 2578:20:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC) 2551:17:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 2497:11:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 2470:01:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 2367:01:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 2353:01:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 2337:01:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 2322:01:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 2221:22:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 2207:14:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 1916:00:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 1642:19:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 1621:15:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 1594:09:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 1520:15:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 1486:looks like a spammer to me. 731:speedied four times as spam 720:speedied four times as spam 690:The most recent incarnation 596:nominated for deletion again 482:00:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 437:11:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC) 420:16:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 399:06:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 191:00:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 146:01:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 94:06:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 3508:01:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3490:. Please comment there. -- 3486:. Already has an open DRV 3478:01:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3371:01:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3317:14:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3308:14:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3294:13:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3281:13:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3267:Overturn and discuss at MfD 3258:14:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3249:13:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3239:13:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3221:13:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3202:12:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3178:obviously and intentionally 3167:11:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3144:09:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3129:07:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3111:07:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3079:05:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3060:02:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3027:09:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3006:02:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2992:02:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2976:01:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2960:01:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2929:01:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2916:01:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2875:00:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2865:00:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2770:14:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2731:03:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2622:03:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2423:23:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2393:23:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2295:23:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2281:23:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2251:23:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2193:21:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2175:15:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2147:15:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2102:15:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2087:15:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2065:15:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 2046:15:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1865:16:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1830:15:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1799:15:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1693:16:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1576:Brad Patrick-2 Sep 29, 2006 1500:22:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1478:21:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1446:21:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1405:20:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1383:20:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 838:Reports - Knowledge (XXG): 685:17:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 610:may be notable but not the 584:project management software 337:21:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 298:21:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 3544: 3468:else review this process. 1794:or overturned and delete. 1561:Thank you for your help. 2562:(as noted by gadfium). — 1572: 1558:put a stop to this now. 618:recreated a new article, 3524:Please do not modify it. 3387:Please do not modify it. 3339:Please do not modify it. 2786:Please do not modify it. 2746:Please do not modify it. 2638:Please do not modify it. 2594:Please do not modify it. 1944:Truth & Consequences 1932:Please do not modify it. 1899:Truth & Consequences 1883:Please do not modify it. 1709:Please do not modify it. 1660:Please do not modify it. 498:Please do not modify it. 453:Please do not modify it. 207:Please do not modify it. 162:Please do not modify it. 110:Please do not modify it. 43:Deletion review archives 2983:; given the userbox is 2536:Television Without Pity 2431:WikiProject's talk page 1534:vehicle for advertising 305:User:Lunawiki/Lunavelis 181:– Deletion endorsed. – 3384:of the article above. 2783:of the article above. 2635:of the article above. 2522:) with a reduction of 1929:of the article above. 1706:of the article above. 750:speedied as spam and 495:of the article above. 204:of the article above. 107:of the article above. 1601:grounds for inclusion 1453:the company article, 3312:See my note above.-- 2987:confrontational. — 1455:overturn and restore 1410:Overturn and restore 120:like by the band. -- 77:Master Passion Greed 1421:is right about the 3091:on their own pages 2949:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS 2401:the redirect now. 1607:topics which have 3531: 3530: 3506: 3368: 3346: 3345: 2957: 2951:style arguments. 2922:other crap exists 2902: 2901: 2894:resist occupation 2753: 2752: 2619: 2601: 2600: 2468: 2444:endorse the close 2235:assumed bad faith 2219: 2191: 2145: 1890: 1889: 1863: 1828: 1667: 1666: 1582: 1581: 1498: 1476: 1444: 866: 460: 459: 379: 365:comment added by 335: 169: 168: 60: 59: 3535: 3526: 3496: 3454: 3440: 3422: 3389: 3367: 3348: 3341: 3232:spilled onto ANI 3189: 2997:Endorse deletion 2972: 2956: 2895: 2887: 2880: 2841: 2827: 2826: 2788: 2755: 2748: 2705: 2691: 2673: 2640: 2618: 2603: 2596: 2568: 2546: 2465: 2459: 2454: 2451: 2421: 2418: 2412: 2350: 2345: 2320: 2317: 2311: 2279: 2276: 2270: 2215: 2187: 2173: 2135: 2107:Endorse redirect 2094:Endorse Redirect 2044: 2041: 2035: 1999: 1985: 1967: 1934: 1892: 1885: 1853: 1818: 1776: 1762: 1744: 1711: 1669: 1662: 1578: 1547:Dear Community: 1541: 1492: 1474: 1468: 1464: 1434: 1399: 1366: 1365: 1332:deleted contribs 1316: 1309: 1308: 1275:deleted contribs 1259: 1252: 1251: 1206:deleted contribs 1185: 1184: 1139:deleted contribs 1118: 1117: 1084:deleted contribs 1068: 1061:UT corp location 1060: 1059: 1014:deleted contribs 993:AtTask, Inc. CEO 992: 991: 958:deleted contribs 942: 934: 933: 900:deleted contribs 884: 758: 735:, Plus 2 AFD's 663:issue cool off. 565: 551: 533: 500: 462: 455: 425:Endorse deletion 404:Endorse deletion 383:Endorse deletion 378: 359: 344:Endorse deletion 325: 274: 260: 242: 209: 171: 164: 143: 138: 112: 70: 56: 36: 31: 3543: 3542: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3522: 3519:deletion review 3463: 3457: 3450: 3449: 3443: 3413: 3397: 3385: 3382:deletion review 3337: 3334:deletion review 3185: 3136:Strong Overturn 3011:Oppose deletion 2970: 2903: 2893: 2850: 2844: 2837: 2836: 2830: 2800: 2796: 2784: 2781:deletion review 2744: 2741:deletion review 2729: 2714: 2708: 2701: 2700: 2694: 2664: 2648: 2636: 2633:deletion review 2592: 2589:deletion review 2575: 2564: 2544: 2463: 2457: 2449: 2416: 2405: 2402: 2348: 2343: 2315: 2304: 2301: 2274: 2263: 2260: 2231:endorse closure 2199:trialsanderrors 2180:Endorse closure 2164: 2119:trialsanderrors 2079:trialsanderrors 2070:Endorse closure 2057:trialsanderrors 2039: 2028: 2025: 2008: 2002: 1995: 1994: 1988: 1958: 1942: 1930: 1927:deletion review 1881: 1878:deletion review 1841:trialsanderrors 1792:Relisted in AFD 1785: 1779: 1772: 1771: 1765: 1735: 1719: 1707: 1704:deletion review 1685:trialsanderrors 1658: 1655:deletion review 1573: 1472: 1466: 1397: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1260: 1255: 1254: 1191: 1187: 1124: 1120: 1069: 1064: 1063: 999: 995: 943: 938: 937: 885: 880: 879: 814:• Discussions: 694:was created by 574: 568: 561: 560: 554: 524: 508: 496: 493:deletion review 451: 448:deletion review 360: 283: 277: 270: 269: 263: 233: 217: 205: 202:deletion review 160: 157:deletion review 141: 136: 108: 105:deletion review 68: 61: 54: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3541: 3539: 3529: 3528: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3465: 3464: 3461: 3455: 3447: 3441: 3392: 3391: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3344: 3343: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3284: 3283: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3228:For the record 3224: 3223: 3205: 3204: 3170: 3169: 3147: 3146: 3132: 3131: 3082: 3081: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3030: 3029: 3008: 2994: 2978: 2962: 2900: 2899: 2888: 2878: 2852: 2851: 2848: 2842: 2834: 2828: 2791: 2790: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2751: 2750: 2735: 2734: 2725: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2706: 2698: 2692: 2643: 2642: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2599: 2598: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2571: 2553: 2500: 2499: 2472: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2177: 2149: 2104: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2010: 2009: 2006: 2000: 1992: 1986: 1937: 1936: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1888: 1887: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1834: 1833: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1777: 1769: 1763: 1714: 1713: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1665: 1664: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1624: 1623: 1580: 1579: 1570: 1569: 1566: 1545: 1539: 1538: 1522: 1502: 1480: 1448: 1407: 1386: 1385: 1367: 1310: 1253: 1189:61.193.186.130 1186: 1119: 1062: 994: 936: 877: 876: 875: 874: 868: 867: 754: 744: 743: 725: 724: 713: 712: 624:User:Chrislk02 576: 575: 572: 566: 558: 552: 503: 502: 487: 486: 485: 484: 458: 457: 442: 441: 440: 439: 422: 401: 380: 340: 339: 285: 284: 281: 275: 267: 261: 212: 211: 196: 195: 194: 193: 167: 166: 151: 150: 149: 148: 115: 114: 99: 98: 97: 96: 67: 65:9 January 2008 62: 58: 57: 49: 40: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3540: 3527: 3525: 3520: 3515: 3514: 3509: 3504: 3500: 3495: 3494: 3489: 3485: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3460: 3453: 3446: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3421: 3417: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3390: 3388: 3383: 3378: 3377: 3372: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3356: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3342: 3340: 3335: 3330: 3329: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3292: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3273: 3268: 3265: 3259: 3256: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3247: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3226: 3225: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3207: 3206: 3203: 3200: 3199: 3197: 3192: 3191: 3188: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3172: 3171: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3149: 3148: 3145: 3142: 3137: 3134: 3133: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3098: 3096: 3092: 3086: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3009: 3007: 3004: 3003: 2998: 2995: 2993: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2979: 2977: 2974: 2973: 2966: 2963: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2937: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2927: 2923: 2918: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2897: 2896: 2889: 2886: 2882: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2873: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2847: 2840: 2833: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2799: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2789: 2787: 2782: 2777: 2776: 2771: 2768: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2749: 2747: 2742: 2737: 2736: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2723: 2711: 2704: 2697: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2672: 2668: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2641: 2639: 2634: 2629: 2628: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2611: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2597: 2595: 2590: 2585: 2584: 2579: 2574: 2569: 2567: 2561: 2557: 2556:Keep restored 2554: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2540: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2518: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2473: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2460: 2453: 2452: 2445: 2441: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2419: 2413: 2411: 2409: 2400: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2346: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2318: 2312: 2310: 2308: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2277: 2271: 2269: 2267: 2258: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2181: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2168: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2152:Endorse close 2150: 2148: 2143: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2100: 2095: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2053: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2042: 2036: 2034: 2032: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2005: 1998: 1991: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1933: 1928: 1923: 1922: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1900: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1886: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1873: 1866: 1861: 1857: 1852: 1851: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1826: 1822: 1817: 1816: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1793: 1782: 1775: 1768: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1743: 1739: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1705: 1700: 1699: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1663: 1661: 1656: 1651: 1650: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1577: 1571: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1546: 1542: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1490: 1485: 1484:User:Vpdjuric 1481: 1479: 1475: 1469: 1461: 1460:User:Vpdjuric 1456: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1411: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1395: 1391: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1363: 1360: 1357: 1354: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1338:nuke contribs 1336: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1315: 1306: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1281:nuke contribs 1279: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1267: 1264: 1258: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1240: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1190: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1123: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1106: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1090:nuke contribs 1088: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1067: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1033: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1003: 998: 989: 986: 983: 980: 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 964:nuke contribs 962: 959: 956: 953: 950: 947: 941: 931: 928: 925: 922: 919: 916: 913: 910: 907: 906:nuke contribs 904: 901: 898: 895: 892: 889: 883: 878: 873: 872:Spam Accounts 870: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 762: 757:attask.com: 756: 755: 753: 749: 745: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 723: 719: 715: 714: 711: 707: 704: 701: 697: 693: 689: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 669: 664: 661: 657: 656: 652: 648: 645: 641: 637: 633: 627: 625: 621: 617: 616:User:Vpdjuric 613: 609: 605: 601: 600:User:Vpdjuric 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 571: 564: 557: 549: 545: 541: 537: 532: 528: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 506: 505: 504: 501: 499: 494: 489: 488: 483: 479: 475: 471: 470: 466: 465: 464: 463: 456: 454: 449: 444: 443: 438: 434: 430: 426: 423: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 402: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 381: 376: 372: 368: 364: 357: 353: 349: 345: 342: 341: 338: 333: 329: 324: 323: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 301: 300: 299: 295: 291: 280: 273: 266: 258: 254: 250: 246: 241: 237: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 214: 213: 210: 208: 203: 198: 197: 192: 188: 184: 180: 179: 175: 174: 173: 172: 165: 163: 158: 153: 152: 147: 144: 139: 133: 129: 128: 127: 126: 123: 117: 116: 113: 111: 106: 101: 100: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 78: 74: 73: 72: 71: 66: 63: 53: 48: 44: 39: 32: 23: 19: 3523: 3516: 3492: 3484:Speedy close 3483: 3466: 3386: 3379: 3353: 3338: 3331: 3270: 3266: 3227: 3208: 3198: 3195: 3190: 3186: 3177: 3173: 3150: 3135: 3116: 3099: 3094: 3090: 3087: 3083: 3048: 3014: 3010: 3000: 2996: 2984: 2980: 2968: 2965:Keep deleted 2964: 2944: 2940: 2936:Keep deleted 2935: 2919: 2904: 2891: 2868: 2853: 2785: 2778: 2760: 2745: 2738: 2720: 2717: 2637: 2630: 2608: 2593: 2586: 2565: 2555: 2542: 2516: 2502: 2501: 2476: 2455: 2447: 2443: 2407: 2406: 2398: 2397:The article 2306: 2305: 2265: 2264: 2256: 2230: 2179: 2166: 2159: 2158:points out, 2151: 2131: 2113:(based upon 2106: 2093: 2073: 2069: 2051: 2030: 2029: 2017: 2013: 2011: 1931: 1924: 1908:IronGargoyle 1897: 1882: 1875: 1849: 1845:Speedy close 1844: 1814: 1805: 1804: 1791: 1788: 1708: 1701: 1674: 1659: 1652: 1631: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1583: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1509: 1504: 1487: 1454: 1450: 1430: 1422: 1409: 1389: 1358: 1352: 1346: 1340: 1334: 1328: 1322: 1301: 1295: 1289: 1283: 1277: 1271: 1265: 1244: 1238: 1232: 1226: 1220: 1214: 1208: 1202: 1196: 1177: 1171: 1165: 1159: 1153: 1147: 1141: 1135: 1129: 1122:65.202.21.15 1110: 1104: 1098: 1092: 1086: 1080: 1074: 1052: 1046: 1040: 1034: 1028: 1022: 1016: 1010: 1004: 997:160.7.248.35 984: 978: 972: 966: 960: 954: 948: 926: 920: 914: 908: 902: 896: 890: 871: 812:COIBot-Local 796:MER-C X-wiki 748:AtTask, Inc. 702: 692:AtTask, Inc. 668:AtTask, Inc. 665: 659: 630: 628: 611: 607: 603: 577: 510:AtTask, Inc. 497: 490: 474:IronGargoyle 469:AtTask, Inc. 467: 452: 445: 424: 403: 382: 361:— Preceding 343: 321: 286: 206: 199: 183:IronGargoyle 176: 161: 154: 118: 109: 102: 75: 64: 47:2008 January 2719:its course. 2650:Pilot (CSI) 2610:Pilot (CSI) 2503:restoration 2450:thedemonhog 864:AboutUs.com 860:domaintools 804:Links on en 802:• Reports: 759:Linksearch 3399:Match pump 3355:match pump 3071:Eluchil404 2229:I wish to 2127:WP:EPISODE 2012:Closed as 1681:WP:CRYSTAL 1373:involved-- 1356:block user 1350:filter log 1299:block user 1293:filter log 1257:Jehoshua22 1242:block user 1212:filter log 1175:block user 1145:filter log 1108:block user 1102:filter log 1050:block user 1020:filter log 982:block user 976:filter log 924:block user 918:filter log 882:Natebowler 858:• Domain: 850:• Google: 764:(insource) 733:WP:CSD#G11 722:WP:CSD#G11 412:NawlinWiki 122:"heliosis" 52:January 10 3037:Xavexgoem 3019:Xavexgoem 1415:WP:CSD#G4 1362:block log 1305:block log 1248:block log 1181:block log 1114:block log 1056:block log 988:block log 930:block log 826:• COIBot- 792:Spamcheck 752:WP:CSD#g4 642:see also 356:WP:CSD#A7 219:Lunavelis 178:Lunavelis 38:January 8 3503:Contribs 3493:lifebaka 3209:Overturn 3174:Overturn 3151:Overturn 3121:atakdoug 3117:Overturn 3103:atakdoug 3002:MastCell 2727:contribs 2566:xDanielx 2520:contribs 2142:Contribs 2132:lifebaka 2014:redirect 1860:Contribs 1850:lifebaka 1825:Contribs 1815:lifebaka 1441:Contribs 1431:lifebaka 1423:possible 1419:hahnchen 1326:contribs 1269:contribs 1200:contribs 1133:contribs 1078:contribs 1066:Vpdjuric 1008:contribs 952:contribs 894:contribs 834:, & 820:advanced 727:Article 716:Article 706:contribs 408:WP:MUSIC 387:WP:MUSIC 375:contribs 363:unsigned 352:WP:MUSIC 332:Contribs 322:lifebaka 309:WP:MUSIC 290:Lunawiki 20:‎ | 3445:restore 3416:protect 3411:history 3364:Viridae 2985:clearly 2981:Endorse 2953:Viridae 2870:more.-- 2832:restore 2811:history 2696:restore 2667:protect 2662:history 2615:Viridae 2545:pd_THOR 2510:Sceptre 2485:be bold 2481:WP:RFPP 2477:endorse 2213:Rossami 2185:Rossami 2052:Comment 1990:restore 1961:protect 1956:history 1767:restore 1738:protect 1733:history 1613:Renesis 1605:notable 1525:comment 1505:Restore 1390:Restore 816:tracked 788:wikt:fr 784:wikt:en 746:Article 677:Renesis 612:company 608:product 556:restore 527:protect 522:history 391:Stormie 348:notable 265:restore 236:protect 231:history 86:Stormie 3420:delete 3246:Walton 3182:Charon 3159:Fosnez 3141:Walton 3067:WP:MfD 3052:MQDuck 2971:Daniel 2941:do not 2908:MQDuck 2857:MQDuck 2671:delete 2530:) and 2489:Stifle 2410:dokter 2359:Daniel 2329:Daniel 2309:dokter 2287:Daniel 2268:dokter 2243:Daniel 2217:(talk) 2189:(talk) 2171:scribe 2156:Secret 2111:Secret 2099:Secret 2074:Heroes 2033:dokter 2022:CSD G4 1965:delete 1806:Relist 1796:Secret 1742:delete 1467:spryde 1458:guide 1451:Delete 1426:WP:COI 1394:hahnch 940:Scjnsn 852:search 808:COIBot 780:simple 729:AtTask 696:Scjnsn 673:AtTask 660:comply 632:AtTask 604:delete 598:after 580:AtTask 531:delete 429:Stifle 317:WP:COI 240:delete 3452:cache 3437:views 3429:watch 3425:links 2989:Coren 2920:That 2839:cache 2819:watch 2815:links 2722:JERRY 2703:cache 2688:views 2680:watch 2676:links 2464:edits 2385:KC109 2257:never 2154:. As 1997:cache 1982:views 1974:watch 1970:links 1812:. -- 1774:cache 1759:views 1751:watch 1747:links 1495:Help! 1314:Vms37 1218:WHOIS 1151:WHOIS 1026:WHOIS 836:XWiki 832:Local 718:@task 644:@task 620:@task 563:cache 548:views 540:watch 536:links 367:Aecis 319:. -- 272:cache 257:views 249:watch 245:links 55:: --> 16:< 3499:Talk 3488:here 3474:talk 3470:AIEA 3433:logs 3407:talk 3403:edit 3360:here 3304:talk 3300:Itub 3277:talk 3217:talk 3213:Itub 3196:talk 3163:talk 3125:talk 3107:talk 3075:talk 3056:talk 3041:talk 3023:talk 2934:(ec) 2912:talk 2861:talk 2823:logs 2807:talk 2803:edit 2684:logs 2658:talk 2654:edit 2560:this 2538:). 2532:Erin 2524:plot 2514:talk 2493:talk 2458:talk 2446:. – 2438:the 2417:Talk 2389:talk 2363:talk 2349:ecis 2333:talk 2316:Talk 2291:talk 2275:Talk 2247:talk 2239:this 2203:talk 2160:keep 2138:Talk 2123:WP:V 2117:). 2109:per 2083:talk 2061:talk 2040:Talk 2018:keep 1978:logs 1952:talk 1948:edit 1912:talk 1904:bold 1856:Talk 1821:Talk 1755:logs 1729:talk 1725:edit 1689:talk 1683:. – 1638:talk 1617:talk 1590:talk 1586:Hu12 1516:talk 1473:talk 1437:Talk 1379:talk 1375:Hu12 1344:logs 1320:talk 1287:logs 1263:talk 1236:http 1230:RBLs 1224:RDNS 1194:talk 1169:http 1163:RBLs 1157:RDNS 1127:talk 1096:logs 1072:talk 1044:http 1038:RBLs 1032:RDNS 1002:talk 970:logs 946:talk 912:logs 888:talk 856:meta 828:Link 768:meta 739:and 700:talk 681:talk 651:talk 647:Hu12 638:and 544:logs 518:talk 514:edit 478:talk 433:talk 416:talk 395:talk 371:talk 328:Talk 313:WP:N 311:and 294:talk 253:logs 227:talk 223:edit 187:talk 142:ecis 125:Talk 90:talk 35:< 3459:AfD 3314:Doc 3291:Doc 3272:DGG 3255:Doc 3236:Doc 3069:. 2926:Doc 2872:Doc 2846:AfD 2767:Doc 2710:AfD 2541:— 2528:IGN 2167:WjB 2004:AfD 1843:. 1781:AfD 1633:DGG 1611:-- 1531:a " 1529:NOT 1511:DGG 1489:Guy 824:RSN 570:AfD 279:AfD 22:Log 3501:- 3476:) 3435:| 3431:| 3427:| 3423:| 3418:| 3414:| 3409:| 3405:| 3362:– 3306:) 3279:) 3219:) 3165:) 3127:) 3109:) 3097:. 3077:) 3058:) 3050:-- 3025:) 2945:do 2914:) 2863:) 2821:| 2817:| 2813:| 2809:| 2805:| 2686:| 2682:| 2678:| 2674:| 2669:| 2665:| 2660:| 2656:| 2576:\ 2549:| 2495:) 2487:. 2461:• 2420:• 2414:• 2403:— 2399:is 2391:) 2365:) 2335:) 2319:• 2313:• 2302:— 2293:) 2278:• 2272:• 2261:— 2249:) 2205:) 2140:- 2085:) 2063:) 2043:• 2037:• 2026:— 1980:| 1976:| 1972:| 1968:| 1963:| 1959:| 1954:| 1950:| 1914:) 1858:- 1823:- 1757:| 1753:| 1749:| 1745:| 1740:| 1736:| 1731:| 1727:| 1691:) 1640:) 1619:) 1592:) 1584:-- 1574:— 1568:” 1544:“ 1518:) 1470:| 1439:- 1381:) 862:• 854:• 848:de 846:- 844:fr 842:- 840:en 830:, 822:- 818:- 810:- 806:- 800:gs 798:• 794:• 790:• 786:- 782:- 778:- 776:fr 774:- 772:de 770:- 766:- 761:en 683:) 653:) 546:| 542:| 538:| 534:| 529:| 525:| 520:| 516:| 480:) 435:) 418:) 410:. 397:) 377:) 373:• 358:. 330:- 296:) 255:| 251:| 247:| 243:| 238:| 234:| 229:| 225:| 189:) 92:) 84:– 45:: 3505:) 3497:( 3472:( 3462:) 3456:| 3448:| 3442:( 3439:) 3401:( 3302:( 3275:( 3215:( 3193:/ 3187:X 3161:( 3123:( 3105:( 3073:( 3054:( 3043:) 3039:( 3021:( 2910:( 2898:. 2859:( 2849:) 2843:| 2835:| 2829:( 2825:) 2801:( 2713:) 2707:| 2699:| 2693:( 2690:) 2652:( 2573:C 2570:/ 2534:( 2517:· 2512:( 2491:( 2408:E 2387:( 2361:( 2344:A 2331:( 2307:E 2289:( 2266:E 2245:( 2201:( 2144:) 2136:( 2081:( 2059:( 2031:E 2007:) 2001:| 1993:| 1987:( 1984:) 1946:( 1910:( 1862:) 1854:( 1827:) 1819:( 1784:) 1778:| 1770:| 1764:( 1761:) 1723:( 1687:( 1636:( 1615:( 1588:( 1514:( 1497:) 1493:( 1443:) 1435:( 1402:n 1398:e 1377:( 1364:) 1359:· 1353:· 1347:· 1341:· 1335:· 1329:· 1323:· 1318:( 1307:) 1302:· 1296:· 1290:· 1284:· 1278:· 1272:· 1266:· 1261:( 1250:) 1245:· 1239:· 1233:· 1227:· 1221:· 1215:· 1209:· 1203:· 1197:· 1192:( 1183:) 1178:· 1172:· 1166:· 1160:· 1154:· 1148:· 1142:· 1136:· 1130:· 1125:( 1116:) 1111:· 1105:· 1099:· 1093:· 1087:· 1081:· 1075:· 1070:( 1058:) 1053:· 1047:· 1041:· 1035:· 1029:· 1023:· 1017:· 1011:· 1005:· 1000:( 990:) 985:· 979:· 973:· 967:· 961:· 955:· 949:· 944:( 932:) 927:· 921:· 915:· 909:· 903:· 897:· 891:· 886:( 703:· 698:( 679:( 649:( 573:) 567:| 559:| 553:( 550:) 512:( 476:( 431:( 414:( 393:( 369:( 334:) 326:( 292:( 282:) 276:| 268:| 262:( 259:) 221:( 185:( 137:A 88:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Deletion review/Log/2008 January 9 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index