510:
as no consensus, defaulting to keep. Only three people actually stated whether the article merited being kept or being deleted. Ironically, the person who brought this to DRV made two posts without stating whether he/she was recommending keeping, deleting, or something else. Neither did the IP who
271:
indicated some plausible reason for importance and that is sufficient. It does not have to show enough to pass afd -- in fact, it probably wouldnt pass at this point, but any indication of notability deserves a group view to see if either the editor or others can source it. But to pass speedy, it
223:
The article didn't technically assert importance in any real way, at least not in the cached versions I can see. Inbound links are useful to consider but don't really prove anything. What is the actual claim of importance, and are there sources to back it up? If there's a decent answer to that
511:
made a comment (and in terms of determining consensus, !votes by IPs tend to be discounted in this process). So, depending on the interpretation of
Cryptic's comments, there was either a consensus to keep or no consensus. Either way, the seven days passed and there was no consensus to delete.
258:
was deleted almost 2 hours later by a different admin under A7, and I'd definitely have deleted it myself under A7. If the article on the company fails to assert importance, than being its CEO is at best a tenuous assertion of importance. So I think the real claims are the new game search
475:
Closer seems to have read only the bolded words, not the actual discussion. Had he done the latter, he would have seen that, of the only two users wishing to keep this article, the first had repudiated his opinion, and the second - the article's primary author - had been refuted.
186:
This article underwent a speedy deletion on an unfounded basis. The numerousness of articles that link to it is itself already sufficient testament to the person's noteworthiness, to say nothing of the fact that it should have made any possible deletion subject to a discussion.
489:(delete). The keep arguments were clearly unfounded because of misstatement by the 'keep' voters, and it would appear the closer was 'blinded by their science'. There is nothing to suggest that this band meets any of the criteria of
177:
51:
37:
584:
I don't believe we ignore !votes from IPs because they're from IPs. Usually they're ignored because IPs aren't familiar with the AfD process and the
466:
46:
649:. I don't read any consensus there, and with the low participation I think it'd be better to reopen and relist it rather than closing it as
750:. Sloppy close. Relist for more participation. It seems to me that none of the sources are reliable/reputable and independent. --
42:
134:
129:
324:
and list at AfD. Evidence can be provided in the article during the AfD. If
Dissident wants more time, userfy it for him. --
138:
665:
600:
588:, and so make arguements that should be ignored. We don't ignore any arguements except by the merits of the arguement. --
188:
163:
121:
21:
733:
Despite the apparent simplicity of the issue, seems the discussion was closed before a consensus either way took hold.
783:
there wasn't a consensus to keep there, and the discussion was leaning towards a delete result. More opinions needed.
423:
418:
427:
848:
544:
thrice? There is nothing ironic in me not making a bolded incantation; I was trying to form a consensus, not to
389:
344:
288:
For AFD to be anything but an exercise in process, it would be nice to see that evidence at DRV, if it exists. --
100:
17:
452:
410:
247:
637:
625:
564:
Conventionally, it's taken as read that a proposer recommends deletion, except when it is stated otherwise.
312:
833:
569:
498:
816:
837:
820:
803:
791:
775:
759:
742:
725:
704:
687:
670:
641:
605:
573:
556:
520:
502:
480:
378:
333:
316:
297:
283:
263:
233:
200:
89:
773:
755:
721:
713:
620:
Also to
Cryptic: It's customary to discuss the closure with the closing admin before listing here.
329:
243:
196:
812:
207:
738:
661:
653:. I'd agree that the closure was incorect regardless of what it gets overturned to. Cheers. --
596:
374:
293:
242:, a Dutch software company that..." "His dissertation introduced two new game search techniques:
229:
85:
700:
553:
477:
125:
307:
and list at AFD. There is enough of an assertion of notability there to defeat an A7 speedy.
829:
565:
516:
494:
768:
683:
549:
490:
459:
170:
800:
751:
717:
325:
192:
259:
techniques, neither of which has ever had an article, but might be important anyway.
734:
654:
589:
585:
370:
289:
279:
225:
81:
785:
696:
414:
260:
117:
76:
444:
218:, none of which demonstrate that this person meets Knowledge's generally accepted
155:
238:
I see multiple possible claims, reproduced with intact red links. "he is CEO of
224:
question, this article should either be restored or userfied for improvements. --
678:
with more participation hopefully some kind of clear consensus will be reached.
633:
621:
512:
308:
251:
679:
767:. No need to relist. The two delete arguments are pretty much irrefutable. --
272:
doesnt have to "prove anything" or have reliable "sources to back it up".
274:
712:
discussion could benefit from increased participation, possibility of a
406:
365:
255:
239:
215:
618:(or change to "no consensus") — there was not a consensus to delete.
250:. Proof-number search has seen further successful application in
206:
The sources within the article at time of deletion included
828:
Needs more input on whether the article should be deleted.
211:
369:– Overturn and relist at AFD to get more participation –
527:
526:
marks around his keep, to more explicitly indicate his
440:
436:
432:
151:
147:
143:
632:
as the first keep "voter" had withdrawn his opinion.
548:. And I succeeded; nobody thought this band meets
552:except the article's creator. Utter disgust. —
811:. Should have been relisted prior to closing.
8:
388:The following is an archived debate of the
99:The following is an archived debate of the
358:
189:An appeal to the responsible administrator
69:
525:So if Esradekan had put magic <s: -->
254:tactical search and many other games".
41:
540:in my comments, would I then have been
50:
628:) 10:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Change to
33:
530:, that would make it ok? If I'd put
7:
851:of the page listed in the heading.
347:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
799:and get some more eyes on it. --
216:a company he currently works for
847:The above is an archive of the
343:The above is an archive of the
1:
212:a company he used to work for
80:– Restore and list at AfD. –
30:
874:
838:22:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
821:18:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
804:03:32, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
792:15:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
776:13:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
760:09:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
743:16:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
726:15:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
705:01:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
695:, needs more opinions. --
688:21:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
671:14:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
642:10:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
606:14:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
574:09:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
557:07:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
521:06:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
503:04:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
481:04:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
379:16:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
334:09:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
317:16:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
298:15:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
284:14:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
264:03:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
234:02:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
201:23:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
90:07:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
854:Please do not modify it.
395:Please do not modify it.
350:Please do not modify it.
106:Please do not modify it.
43:Deletion review archives
647:Overturn and reopen AfD
248:dependency-based search
392:of the article above.
103:of the article above.
208:his personal webpage
191:went unanswered. --
781:Overturn and relist
765:Overturn and Delete
693:Overturn and relist
676:Overturn and relist
630:Overturn and delete
244:proof-number search
861:
860:
669:
604:
357:
356:
60:
59:
865:
856:
710:Take back to AfD
659:
594:
462:
448:
430:
397:
359:
352:
220:
219:
173:
159:
141:
108:
70:
56:
36:
31:
873:
872:
868:
867:
866:
864:
863:
862:
852:
849:deletion review
508:Endorse closure
471:
465:
458:
457:
451:
421:
405:
393:
390:deletion review
348:
345:deletion review
182:
176:
169:
168:
162:
132:
116:
104:
101:deletion review
68:
61:
54:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
871:
869:
859:
858:
843:
842:
841:
840:
823:
806:
794:
778:
762:
745:
731:Reopen, Relist
728:
707:
690:
673:
644:
611:
610:
609:
608:
579:
578:
577:
576:
559:
505:
473:
472:
469:
463:
455:
449:
400:
399:
384:
383:
382:
381:
355:
354:
339:
338:
337:
336:
319:
302:
301:
300:
266:
236:
221:
184:
183:
180:
174:
166:
160:
111:
110:
95:
94:
93:
92:
67:
62:
58:
57:
49:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
870:
857:
855:
850:
845:
844:
839:
835:
831:
827:
824:
822:
818:
814:
810:
807:
805:
802:
798:
795:
793:
790:
789:
788:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
771:
766:
763:
761:
757:
753:
749:
746:
744:
740:
736:
732:
729:
727:
723:
719:
716:being found.
715:
711:
708:
706:
702:
698:
694:
691:
689:
685:
681:
677:
674:
672:
667:
663:
658:
657:
652:
648:
645:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
617:
613:
612:
607:
602:
598:
593:
592:
587:
583:
582:
581:
580:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
536:
533:
529:
528:backpedalling
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
509:
506:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
485:
484:
483:
482:
479:
468:
461:
454:
446:
442:
438:
434:
429:
425:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
396:
391:
386:
385:
380:
376:
372:
368:
367:
363:
362:
361:
360:
353:
351:
346:
341:
340:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
276:
270:
267:
265:
262:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
235:
231:
227:
222:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
179:
172:
165:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
113:
112:
109:
107:
102:
97:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
74:
73:
72:
71:
66:
63:
53:
48:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
853:
846:
825:
808:
796:
786:
784:
780:
769:
764:
747:
730:
709:
692:
675:
655:
651:no consensus
650:
646:
629:
616:Weak endorse
615:
614:
590:
561:
545:
541:
537:
534:
531:
507:
486:
474:
394:
387:
364:
349:
342:
321:
304:
273:
268:
185:
118:Victor Allis
105:
98:
77:Victor Allis
75:
65:11 June 2008
64:
830:Chadpriddle
566:Ohconfucius
495:Ohconfucius
252:computer Go
770:Smashville
801:Ned Scott
752:SmokeyJoe
718:Guest9999
714:consensus
326:SmokeyJoe
193:Dissident
47:2008 June
748:Overturn
735:Townlake
666:Contribs
656:lifebaka
601:Contribs
591:lifebaka
550:WP:MUSIC
491:WP:MUSIC
487:Overturn
371:Davewild
305:Overturn
290:Rividian
226:Rividian
82:Tikiwont
20: |
813:MrPrada
787:Hut 8.5
697:Stormie
562:Comment
554:Cryptic
542:counted
478:Cryptic
453:restore
424:protect
419:history
407:Emarosa
366:Emarosa
322:Restore
269:Restore
261:GRBerry
256:Quintiq
240:Quintiq
164:restore
135:protect
130:history
52:June 12
38:June 10
826:Relist
809:Relist
797:Relist
634:Stifle
622:Stifle
586:WP:ATA
538:delete
535:delete
532:delete
513:B.Wind
428:delete
309:Stifle
139:delete
680:RMHED
460:cache
445:views
437:watch
433:links
171:cache
156:views
148:watch
144:links
55:: -->
16:<
834:talk
817:talk
756:talk
739:talk
722:talk
701:talk
684:talk
662:Talk
638:talk
626:talk
597:Talk
570:talk
546:vote
517:talk
499:talk
441:logs
415:talk
411:edit
375:talk
330:talk
313:talk
294:talk
280:talk
246:and
230:talk
214:and
197:Talk
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
86:talk
35:<
467:AfD
275:DGG
178:AfD
22:Log
836:)
819:)
758:)
741:)
724:)
703:)
686:)
664:-
640:)
599:-
572:)
519:)
501:)
493:.
443:|
439:|
435:|
431:|
426:|
422:|
417:|
413:|
377:)
332:)
315:)
296:)
282:)
232:)
210:,
199:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
88:)
45::
832:(
815:(
754:(
737:(
720:(
699:(
682:(
668:)
660:(
636:(
624:(
603:)
595:(
568:(
515:(
497:(
476:—
470:)
464:|
456:|
450:(
447:)
409:(
373:(
328:(
311:(
292:(
278:(
228:(
195:(
181:)
175:|
167:|
161:(
158:)
120:(
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.