218:", which only gets 128,000 Google hits. "Essjay controversy" only gets 10,600. "Encyclopedia Dramatica" also ranked above "Encyclopedia Britannica" on CustomizeGoogle (a Firefox add-on) searches until it was removed from the list of searches. So notability should not be a concern. The outcome of this review will be based on whether or not the sources which cite Encyclopedia Dramatica are reliable or not. If consensus says that they're not, then there will be no reason to propose a recreation of this article unless it is mentioned in reliable sources in the future. Period. If consensus says that the sources are reliable then the article will be recreated.
1863:- let's see how he goes in Big Brother— he may gain the notoriety that some of the past contestants have and would become notable enough for an article. If not, then the current paragraph on him in the Big Brother 2008 paragraph, with the facts of the Narre Warren incident, should be fine. It's way too early in the show for us to make any judgements on this. By the way, OIC, the "serious questions" are as yet by a single person so I wouldn't make too much of it. He's on Big Brother, whether we like it or not, so he's going to get his paragraph there, own article or not.
1426:
the owner and the rest sounded as if he dictated it. " But, if you happen to be walking by a HERO Certified
Burgers, it’s best that you stop, head on in and enjoy quality from the very first bite." is not a restaurant review, its a PR placement. There is, unfortunately, nothing more common for restaurants than to do this with local papers & tabloids &c.. And even for the Sun there is some extenuation: it was not in the regular section, but a special section on the festival, and such sections are in most cases at least half-way towards advertising.
2132:
personalities who have wiki entries and far less notable personalities. If it was just over one party we wouldn't be having this conversation now would we! Orderinchaos argument seems to contradict itself the point is HE IS A BB HOUSEMATE, HE IS FAMOUS - WE CANT ACCUSE THE MEDIA OF BEING BIASED SIMPLY BECAUSE WE DONT WANT THE GUY TO HAVE A WIKI - people use media references in wikis all the time to support their facts so
Orderinchaos more or less fall flat on their face
980:, "If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability". Article is basically one paragraph and sources cited were company's own website (not independent) and two reviews from the local newspaper bordering on advertising. Correct to assert that the number of restaurant is irrelevant but that does not get over the problem of lack of multiplicity of sources. One newspaper does not satisfy that criterion. --
1384:- There's nothing preventing you from recreating it once you've established notability. You can work on improving it in your sandbox and then move it back to the mainspace once you've expanded it with reliable sources. I would like to say, however, that I don't see how local reviews establish notability. We had a little Thai restaurant here that received rave reviews in the local newspapers, but I don't see how that makes it notable for an encyclopedic entry.
2013:. The Big Brother situation/role, in particular, seems unprecedented (correct me if I'm wrong). Certainly he was not selected through any normal contestant process and is not subject to our "only winning contestants" rule-of-thumb, he was brought in as a spoiler precisely because of his national celebrity. Voluntary participation at this level makes him, even if a minor, no different than other pop stars e.g.
387:
ones. It also clearly lists many more publications then many of the Bios on
Knowledge. Also a quick google search turns up many results ranging from the US to CH most of which are not from self sites, many of which are from published periodicals. Clearly there are as many or more results/published articles as any of the other alternative health community people that are listed on Wikepedia. -Thanks!
2827:. This no longer strikes me as a BLP1E issue as the subject is now actively courting publicity, that said the article is likely to be a magnet for BLP projects as John points out. All in all, I am simply not convinced that this person meets our notability requirements. Per some of the comments above, lets wait to see how he does in Big Brother and how high his musical offerings chart...
627:. Closure of second AfD was correct, though I probably would've relisted it myself. Still well within the closer's discretion. Usually, it's quicker to write a new version in your userspace that meets the requirements from the AfD and ask for it to be put back in mainspace than ask for an overturn. Feel free to bring this back here after you have one. --
513:
notable and we can demonstrate that with proper research in off-line sources. I've had good success saving marginal articles in the past but it is a lot of work. Any time that I see a great deal of discussion about someone on the internet, I think that it is a service to our readers to answer the question, "Who is this person?" Cheers! --
1991:. While pretty much everything he is notable for stems from a single event, the same could be said of many politicians who are notable for things they have done that have resulted from them being elected as politicians. I don't think this is a case of BLP1E, as the event itself is not the only thing that he is notable before.
2508:. I think the main claim to "Subject no longer meets BLP1E" stands from him being in the Big Brother House—any mention of him can begin there, in the Big Brother season X article, and then when it gets beyond stub size, brought back here. But it still seems like BLP1.5E to me right now, hence, I endorse the initial decision(s).
1096:. Nominator should be looking at his watchlist more than once every five days if he is interested in protecting his articles from AfD. That said, there's no policy-based rationale to suggest that this was an improper deletion. Consensus was clearly that the article wasn't worthy of inclusion with the available sources.
2553:
if this is closed as allow an article, please do not close it as "overturn" and then undelete all the revisions, but rather close it as "allow recreation" and keep the old revisions deleted (as they were deleted under the biographies of living persons policy). I believe the article should not be recreated or undeleted.
1732:
I just want to point out that I have also been involved in editing this draft article, and I have added quite a lot of current info to it. To be honest I can't stand this guy, but that is why I have been working on the article, so there is a factual representation of his actions without all the cruff
1317:
I believe this restaurant is notable because any company that rents a cow to walk through
Toronto's most notable street is notable. And this was a notable cow used in Chicago's columbus day parade. The number of restaurants is not up to date on the website and if you count the number on the side it's
929:
I was unaware of the AFD, I was not informed, please relist for AFD so that I can present a rebuttle. The reason for nomination was invalid as the claim was that there are 13 restaurants and there are now more than that. Also the number of restaurants is not a factor of notability, there could be one
2628:
so what if he's set to release a single that is a cover of someone else's work? Are we now going to allow every garage band onto
Knowledge because they have a single they are just about to release? I also note that not one of the big brother housemates has their own article, much less a *guest*. The
2552:
requires that " must not be restored, whether through undeletion or otherwise, without an actual consensus to do so" - therefore, there must be a clear consensus to restore this article should you close it in that manner, and if there's no consensus the outcome must default to keep deleted; and even
2547:
per
Orderinchaos and MrPrada. The Big Brother appearance does not make Worthington any more notable than he was, as consensus is Big Brother housemates are not notable enough for an article. Even if you could piece together the notability from the party, his "music" "career" and then the Big Brother
1340:
The metro article doesn't have much coverage but the
Toronto Sun piece looks substantial. The Toronto Sun also mentions that "HERO Certified Burgers opened to rave reviews"- do we have any of those reviews? I suspect that one of those together with the Toronto Sun piece would be enough to reasonably
1971:
on the same grounds as Nick
Dowling. The oneevent restriction is to prevent overemphasis on minor events in someone's life, irrelevant to any real notability, such as being caught up in a disaster or a bystander to a crime. By extension it can be used for a moderately significant event in the life
1698:
Some of the assertions in that article are blatantly false, although did appear as speculation in the media (mostly News Ltd publications) at the time. Someone contacted
Southern Star-Endemol and confirmed point blank that he would not be involved in hosting Big Brother, although it appears they've
999:-- Looking at the userfied article, there are no reliable sources to verify the information. The Toronto Sun link is broken, and the final cite is just a yellow pages style directory listing. That leaves no procedural problem with the AfD close, as there are no sources to show notability at all. --
386:
This article had been up for the last 2 years. It also clearly meets or exceeds the guidelines of being included in
Knowledge. Dhartung stated that it should be deleted because "Self-published sources only" This is clearly not the case as none of the listed periodical articles are self published
223:
This addresses the notability issue. But as I've yet to add any new sources to my draft, I don't think this review is going to go through. Though I personally think that any other article with the same amount of sources would have survived afd and that it's impossible for people to vote objectively
1425:
The reliability of the Toronto Sun has just taken a further hit--it never had much, for its just a tabloid modelled after British tabloids, & we never count on them much for notability. Reading that "article," it's entirely an advertisement for the company. Half of it consists of quotes from
1708:
Hesperian, I don't want to criticise, but please get your facts right before making assertions about my userfying. I wasn't waiting for the article to be re-written, I was actually going to (in good faith) put some facts on some other pages such as the Narre Warren page for the party incident (as
607:
A little faulty but not too bad. What happened was that I rewrote the article around two years back after it was deleted. It pretty much sat untouched for the last two years flash forward to the other day and I noticed that it had been deleted I had a brain lapse and forgot the 2000 part of my
512:
I'd like to see the article and its references before making a decision. Is it possible to undelete it while this discussion is ongoing. A brief review of Google search material has yielded no sources significant enough to meet our notability criteria, but my gut feeling is that this person is
2131:
Initially Corey was famous for one thing which in itself wasn't considered noteworthy. Whilst others notable for one sport, or one pice of music or one other thing happening have had wikipedia articles created. Corey is now a famous Australian Personality certainly there are far less well known
1070:- there is no additional information provided to warrant a review of the debate or the article's status, in light of the concerns raised at AfD. I note that, if the restaurant's fortunes have turned for the better and their operations have expanded, then maybe an article would be acceptable -
1405:
Sounds good. I will work on the article with some of the sources I've found above and move it into mainspace when I'm done. If local reviews don't establish notability then I think we will be biasing our restaurant articles towards the bigger chains. I think we should have an open mind.
1116:
that article creators be informed of AFDs. On the other hand, there is also no requirement that editors visit every day. I note that Popo... visits about 5-6 times a week, not quite daily. Finally, AFD is not formulated as a trial where each side presents an argument.
1809:, it's doubtful. Incidentally, it's been confirmed since the original coverage that his name is Worthington and always has been, but his mother's name is Delaney and that's what caused the confusion. Essentially a case of very poor fact-checking by media agencies.
2188:
rather than a more specific guideline and second that even if someone doesn't meet a specific guideline we can use common sense to decide notability based on a collection of small events all of which provide reliable sources (which is essentially saying he meets
2726:. He is most notable for trying to be notable; the limited success he has achieved is not worth the long term damage we do by allowing a minor of little significance to be the subject of a biography that will probably be scathing, a magnet for vandalism and an
2472:
Subject no longer meets BLP1E; continued coverage is extensive and comes from credible sources. Since article was deleted solely because of BLP1E and notability based on events rather than the one party incident is verified, there's no reason not to restore the
1187:
s presents an argument as to notability. It's completely open to their interpretation as to what constitutes notability. If it was as simple as you say, then we wouldn't need an AFD and it would be an easy matter to have admins speedy non notable articles after
475:
a person. Simply publishing material is not by itself notability. "Self published", as your confusion indicates, is not the ideal term for this as Knowledge usage is slightly different from mainstream usage, but we use it here as jargon for anything that is
1016:- our role is, as always, to decide whether the AfD was properly closed and not to re-run it. The AfD commentators considered whether the subject was notable and decided, unanimously, that it was not. On this basis there could have been no other close.
774:
lifebaka - thanks that is what I will do. So I would say that this matter is pretty much closed, for now. Life is a bit busy for me now but I will rewrite this sometime and then bring it up to the deleting admin. Thanks to everyone who helped her.
1818:
Considering the continued/continuing news coverage he's getting, I would say these serious concerns about exploiting a minor have probably been diminished...at this stage, it seems fairly certain he wants/is asking for the publicity (IMO).
1159:" so I moved the article after putting it in my watchlist and assumed that the move would watchlist the new article as well. I didn't find out until Lara speedied the redirect "Hero Certified Burger" that I found out about the deletion.
405:. This has been deleted in two separate AfDs. The AfD was up for 5 days and there were no keep arguments. Where are these non-self published sources? The article listed a few articles she had written in minor journals and websites. --
2490:
The main reason not to have an article would be because we don't want to be a tabloid encyclopedia. Sometimes things would be easier if wikipedia were paper - "Sorry, we only have room for 60 000 articles, and Corey was #60 001".
672:
You can ask the deleting admin or bring it back here. I'd suggest checking with the deleting admin first, and only bring it here if they refuse to allow recreation or wish to check for how the community feels about it. Cheers.
2525:
Someone deleted my reason for this nomination. Oh well. Anyway his notability is easily established by his Big Brother appearance and CD release. Even if nothing else, his name should redirect to the Big Brother 2008 article.
1651:
Note: I have used the name Delaney, but there is some debate as to if he should be called Worthington...Delaney is the name I'm used to, and there should be no percieved bias (on my part) in which title is to be chosen
754:. He means it was up for two years prior to the AFD. As I noted in my nomination, it had an odd history in 2006 (I can't see that anymore, of course) and then was left untouched (in deletion terms) until I found it. --
649:
lifebaka Thanks for that tip I will do just that. After rewriting the article in my userspace, so that it meets the requirements where and to whom should I bring it up so that it can be put back in the main space?
213:
First we will address the idea that the site is not notable. Encyclopedia Dramatica (with quotes get 152,000 Google hits. Without quotes, it gets 286,000. This contrasts with "Essjay", on which we have the article
2703:
The single, if it has even been released, is of zero consequence until it hits a chart; intruders on Big Brother are not inherently notable; show me some academic coverage regarding this lad being synonymous with
2149:- The media coverage of this person is way beyond the scope of "ONEEVENT" and there's an incorrect argument that just because this person is a musician, they must have a hit record to pass the main criteria of
551:- No when I say it was up for two years I mean - I rewrote the article after it was weekly deleted the first time, to conform with the the standards at that time, and it has been online for the last two years.
1937:, being a contestant on what is essentially a game show is no more an indication of notability for Delaney than it is for anybody else. Nothing has changed in my view since the last time this was deleted.
445:
Please keep in mind that these "minor journals" such as Midwifery Today are major publications in the field. As for things 'about' the subject, I wouldn't argue that more content could and should be added.
1206:: I'm not saying overturn, I saying undelete and relist or at the very least simply undelete and open up the AFD for a few more days to let a broader audience have there say. Besides myself I'd like to get
2798:
this title was turned into a redirect to the one article in which he is currently mentioned. The closer there explicitly notes that the closure here, if allowing an article, should overrule that action.
1610:
377:
1689:, and nothing on his musical career. But it may serve to bring newcomers to this discussion up to speed on the topic, and is probably a good place to start if there is consensus to allow an article.
1456:
If I were writing an article about a subject that I wanted to keep, I would steer clear of such obvious spam, even be it print spam. It just doesn't help an article when other sources are so thin. --
2808:
Thanks for copying that over, GRBerry, I forgot all about doing so :) Yes, naturally, if a DRV finds a consensus for an article to exist, that will override an editorial decision to redirect.
421:. No sources available on the subject. The minor list of publications that the subject has written for doesn't constitute verifiable, reliable, independent sources. You need to have things
1620:
Since our February discussions, Delaney has continued as a well known figure in Australia. He is set to release a single, "Fight for Your Right (to Party)" (a Beastie Boys cover), and when
1647:, and that he is thus notable for an article here. I am happy to work on a draft article with others (I haven't had the time to do one now...) if nobody has one lying around for now.
920:
182:
1169:: It might not be the official policy but it's considered a good practise and seeing as how I'm the creator and sole writer of the article why not just post a note to my talk page?
1709:
opposed to wanting his own page). I actually thought at the time he wasn't notable for his own article, but the out-of-control party, which got unprecedented media coverage, was.
593:) and speedily deleted just in the past couple of days. I think I noticed at while patrolling new pages, so it hasn't been up for two years, but my recollection could be wrong.
1074:
additional independent sources are available to document the facts of the article. There is no evidence to suggest that this is the case, however, and my own research turns up
1922:
before a standalone article, obvious some detail should now be in the appropriate BB articles. When that gets to the point where a daughter article is necessary then create.
1033:. The problem, as I stated in the AFD, is not the number of stores, but the references. There was nothing indicating anything more than that it's a local restaurant. Compare
608:
username and in the process of trying to log in created the account drumzandspace and recreated the article. So yes I did recreate it but it also had been up for 2 years.
977:
2549:
2088:
Hope the Australian project keeps this and the previous debate well linked and not lost into the ether - it is a good example of how we as a project come to terms with
1624:
reported this, they also noted that "Since January, when he became either the most loved or hated party boy, Worthington hasn't stopped fielding offers for work".
371:
1805:. He is of marginal notability and there's been some serious questions as to whether he is a minor being exploited in this situation. Per "do no harm" and also
1614:
1600:
1200:
The AfD commentators considered whether the subject was notable and decided, unanimously, that it was not. On this basis there could have been no other close
1846:
I don't want this guy to have an article, but I think that he's now notable for more than one thing (just). The article should be carefully written though.
1173:
AFD is not formulated as a trial where each side presents an argument. The best argument for protecting an article is to source it impeccably to begin with
1155:: I normally put an article on my watchlist after I created it. In this particular case, I learned after the fact official name was "Hero Certified Burger
2197:
is relevant. Even if we didn't have a particular guideline to cover something it doesn't mean we have to establish a new guideline to include an article.
877:
872:
139:
134:
2795:
881:
143:
2455:- notable because of all the media coverage on him, no so much because of the oneevent! Notability is easily proved by multiple significant sources.
530:. When you say it was up for two years, what you mean was that you reposted it after it was re-deleted the second or third time and nobody noticed.
51:
37:
906:
864:
590:
168:
126:
1636:. As well as reports on him being in the house, there have also been responses to his entry, and criticism of what this means, see for instance
2286:
notability guideline and his notability is no longer based on one event now with the plentiful coverage related to his big brother appearence.
46:
1296:) 01:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Actually it looks like I just screwed up the reference in the original article to have a comma come after the link.
2042:
1192:
there is no additional information provided to warrant a review of the debate or the article's status, in light of the concerns raised at AfD
2038:
2133:
1272:
Does someone have access to the original Toronto sun article? That might help in deciding how much of an assertion of notability was made.
2430:: Yes, other information about him has been entered into the aricle, such has the confusion over his name etc. But it needs improvement.
2384:
1723:
I do most humbly apologise, JRG. I should not have assumed; or rather, I should have checked with you or kept my assumptions to myself.
576:
1084:
328:
323:
2548:
appearance, he still does not meet the encyclopedic threshold for notability. By the way, to the closer, two things to keep in mind:
1557:
1552:
332:
42:
1145:
Nominator should be looking at his watchlist more than once every five days if he is interested in protecting his articles from AfD
1561:
2658:
1770:
I was actually going to wait a few more days before I filed this DRV myself but H20 makes essentially the case I was going to.
1442:
A positive article doesn't mean that we can't use it. We have to be neutral but individual citations don't have to be neutral.
1207:
357:
315:
191:
Yes, this may be deja vu all over again, but we got a draft of a new ED article with sources and everything up and running at
1586:
1544:
1326:. Furthermore, this company is notable because of the uniqueness of the niche it is in (making all burgers with angus beef).
685:
639:
1885:
1827:
1663:
1211:
949:
709:
598:
21:
2774:
George Bush isnt a minor, and he is one of the most notable people alive. I suggest you read my opinion again in full.
1877:
Just pointing out (as your draft references) the other assertions to notability, apart from the Big Brother appearance.
2096:
over time - I agree with Dhartungs comments - and others that we should keep vigilance with WP:BLP1E both for keeping
1053:
per BlueValour. Not wanting to be rude, but it is clear in the instructions that DRV is to correct errors in process.
868:
780:
655:
613:
584:
556:
498:
451:
392:
130:
2184:
I don't think his comment is that complicated. The point can be interpreted two ways: first, that Worthington meets
1632:
house in Australia, and has received significant coverage on Google News for this; see the numerous articles listed
208:- As far as notability is concerned, I'll copy here what I posted at the DRV for ED I tried to start a few days ago:
2336:
2153:. People can be notable for reasons outside the "specially notability" guidelines like WP:MUSIC, WP:PROF, etc.. --
1447:
1411:
1368:
1331:
1301:
1293:
1286:
1256:
1243:: It doesn't mean that it can't be used. Just because a source isn't online anymore doesn't mean it's invalid. The
1227:
935:
2894:
2460:
1523:
1479:
843:
795:
294:
246:
105:
17:
2859:
2757:
2587:
2415:
2349:
1682:
2730:
for attacks. Lets wait till he has done something of merit, or is no longer a minor, before taking that step.
2194:
2137:
1879:
1821:
1657:
705:
594:
2388:
1637:
1390:
1075:
1058:
986:
958:
731:
570:
2172:
1951:
1851:
1810:
1700:
1021:
860:
816:
776:
651:
609:
580:
552:
518:
494:
447:
388:
122:
76:
2531:
1643:
While Delaney's notability does still stem from that party he held, I believe it has now expanded beyond
319:
2332:
1548:
1443:
1407:
1364:
1327:
1297:
1289:
1252:
1223:
931:
566:
2513:
2353:
2040:
1625:
2009:, as the continued media coverage means his notability has gone beyond any rational interpretation of
2634:
2456:
2379:
1792:
1017:
411:
230:
2527:
930:
restaurant and still be notable. I am unable to present a full rebuttle without seeing the article.
311:
267:
2883:
2838:
2834:
2817:
2803:
2780:
2769:
2736:
2714:
2696:
2638:
2599:
2562:
2535:
2517:
2500:
2482:
2464:
2446:
2392:
2369:
2357:
2340:
2323:
2295:
2274:
2257:
2253:
2232:
2206:
2175:
2162:
2141:
2123:
2111:
2078:
2064:
2029:
1999:
1983:
1963:
1941:
1929:
1926:
1910:
1894:
1872:
1855:
1836:
1813:
1797:
1779:
1756:
1742:
1727:
1724:
1718:
1703:
1693:
1690:
1672:
1540:
1512:
1500:
1464:
1451:
1437:
1415:
1400:
1372:
1350:
1335:
1305:
1281:
1260:
1231:
1218:
to find any additional notable sources if they exist. It couldn't hurt and might help. Do it under
1129:
1104:
1088:
1062:
1045:
1025:
1008:
991:
968:
939:
832:
784:
762:
739:
713:
690:
659:
644:
617:
602:
560:
543:
522:
502:
488:
455:
437:
413:
396:
283:
235:
199:
94:
2509:
2727:
2310:
2291:
2270:
2228:
2158:
2108:
2026:
2010:
1997:
1972:
of a minor, to protect him. He does not want protection--that much is obvious. So we include it.
1959:
1461:
1395:
1126:
1102:
1042:
981:
963:
759:
724:
681:
635:
485:
435:
215:
196:
192:
2754:
biography that will probably be scathing, a magnet for vandalism and an opportunity for attacks.
1733:
that the media places on it. I can only do so much though, it needs other editors to work on it.
1617:, especially, contains a fair few sources or claims to notability, to which this DRV will add.
2478:
2202:
2074:
2014:
1847:
1775:
1346:
1277:
1079:
1037:, a six-store chain that is the subject of much local lore, a famed SNL sketch, and a book. --
1034:
514:
468:
2092:
within our little corner of the planet - it compares interestingly with some other Afd's and
2813:
2765:
2692:
2595:
2558:
2496:
2442:
2365:
1738:
1215:
829:
280:
2069:
Well yes. But that has little bearing on whether he meets our article inclusion standards.
2630:
2150:
2120:
1919:
1806:
1788:
1644:
1633:
1196:
our role is, as always, to decide whether the AfD was properly closed and not to re-run it
480:
for accuracy, such as articles they publish, books they write, or interviews they give. --
464:
406:
225:
1609:
There has been a fair bit of discussion related to this topic in the past, so please see
1593:
913:
722:
as the result of the second AfD, so to say that it's been there for two years is wrong.
364:
175:
1319:
704:
AfD closures appear to have been correct, having seen a recent version of the article.
2829:
2584:
Significant coverage by multiple Reliable Secondary Sources Independent of the subject.
2249:
1938:
1923:
1004:
2856:
Significant coverage by multiple Reliable Secondary Sources Independent of the subject
2404:
How is this article harmful? Below is the "inclusion test" from the policy you linked:
2316:
2304:
2287:
2283:
2266:
2224:
2185:
2154:
2105:
2059:
2053:
2022:
1992:
1979:
1955:
1868:
1752:
1714:
1685:. It is a bit out of date; for example it contains very little on his involvement in
1457:
1433:
1385:
1219:
1122:
1097:
1038:
953:
755:
751:
674:
628:
538:
532:
481:
477:
463:. Drumz, you are confusing what a person has written and published, which are always
430:
89:
83:
1791:
and be worthy of an article anyway. Until then, still looks all a bit BLP1E to me.
952:
for the nominator's convenience. I'll weigh in once an argument has been presented.
2880:
2800:
2705:
2674:
2667:
2609:
2474:
2198:
2070:
1906:
1771:
1360:
1342:
1323:
1318:
actually 17 not 13 locations. In addition to the sources provided, we can also add
1273:
1578:
898:
349:
160:
2863:
2851:
2809:
2776:
2761:
2749:
2732:
2710:
2688:
2591:
2579:
2554:
2492:
2438:
2361:
2190:
1734:
1629:
1621:
1244:
1054:
825:
276:
565:
My memory could be faulty, but I think the page was recreated several times by
1505:
2428:
Is the information given due weight in relation to the subject's notability?
1320:
Metro News "Four beerlicious days ahead" by Ann-Marie Colacino/Metro Toronto
1000:
2760:
and check your assertions, as I have tried to keep it NPOV as best I can.
2550:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff#Summary deletion of BLPs
1356:
1974:
1864:
1748:
1710:
1428:
720:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log&page=Demetria_Clark
2876:
1248:
81:– Too soon since the last request, nothign new added, and just "no". –
1119:
The best argument for protecting an article is to source it impeccably
948:- As the deleting admin, I've pasted the last revision of the article
2248:. Has moved beyond a single event. Sources exist. Meets WP:N. --
2223:
For the record, JoshuaZ explained my comments better than I did. --
1149:
I note that Popo... visits about 5-6 times a week, not quite daily
2875:, at least for the time being, per Orderinchaos and Black Kite.--
1163:
There is no requirement that article creators be informed of AFDs
493:
Thank you for explaining 'self-published' makes it much clearer.
2650:
No, but combin the with the other things he's done, and you get:
2629:
people who want this article restored are grasping at straws. --
2282:
plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources to meet the
1611:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Corey Delaney discussion
1787:. If he releases a single, and it charts, then he'll pass
1574:
1570:
1566:
894:
890:
886:
719:
345:
341:
337:
156:
152:
148:
2862:
for sources, and you can see that infact it does meet
2578:
policy you seem to be quoting from, all I can find is
2414:: Yes, it is already well known, check the sources on
467:
even if appearing in a reliable publication, and what
2590:for the sources, or hell, do a google news search.
2424:: Yes, all claims have been backed up with sources
2794:With no prejudice to the outcome of this DRV, at
1699:brought him on the show in a different capacity.
275:endorsed, with advice given regarding rewrite. –
1679:Apparently in long anticipation of this moment,
2037:Ongoing coverage from just the last few hours:
1918:and see that notability is established beyond
2687:So yeah, he didn't just release a single....
478:essentially relying on the subject themselves
8:
2348:the article I've been keeping up to date at
195:. Is this enough to assert notability, etc?
1522:The following is an archived debate of the
842:The following is an archived debate of the
293:The following is an archived debate of the
104:The following is an archived debate of the
1493:
809:
260:
69:
2796:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 16
2752:'s biography could be considered to be a
2422:Is the information definitive and factual
2167:On what basis are you arguing to restore
2021:to continued vigilance for BLP issues. --
2666:Has become synonymous in Australia for "
2356:(as that is his real name) and redirect
1135:Responses to procedural related comments
41:
2412:Is the information already widely known
1315:Response to notability related comments
50:
2541:Strongly endorse deletion/keep deleted
33:
2576:encyclopedic threshold for notability
2171:article? This is not a policy forum.
7:
1247:is one of three major newspapers in
2897:of the page listed in the heading.
2680:Has been an intruder on Big Brother
2383:orderinchaos' reasoning, above.
1482:of the page listed in the heading.
798:of the page listed in the heading.
249:of the page listed in the heading.
2756:. I would have to ask you to read
1628:Delaney also recently entered the
28:
2673:Is now famous for being famous -
2659:Major International News coverage
2608:Endorse deletion, per Lankiveil.
224:on this (I can understand why).--
2100:deleting - so in the end I am a
2893:The above is an archive of the
2574:I'd be interested to read this
1747:No problem - you are forgiven.
1478:The above is an archive of the
1208:Knowledge:WikiProject Companies
794:The above is an archive of the
245:The above is an archive of the
2119:per Orderinchaos's reasoning.
1681:JRG has maintained a draft at
1355:I found 6 third party reviews
1:
1212:Knowledge:WikiProject Toronto
1112:On the one hand, there is no
718:It was deleted on April 28 -
30:
1322:. Metro News is part of the
1613:before commeting here. The
1363:. I haven't read them yet.
2920:
2854:notability is defined as:
2350:User:JRG/Corey Worthington
1683:User:JRG/Corey Worthington
1287:Found it under a new link
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
2900:Please do not modify it.
2884:11:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
2839:13:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
2818:13:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
2804:13:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
2781:08:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
2770:05:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
2737:13:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
2715:08:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
2697:05:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
2639:13:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
2600:05:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
2563:10:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
2536:08:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
2518:04:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
2501:15:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
2483:14:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
2465:03:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
2447:08:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
2393:21:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
2370:09:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
2280:Allow recreation/restore
2233:17:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
1757:13:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
1743:08:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
1638:this AdelaideNow article
1529:Please do not modify it.
1513:02:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1485:Please do not modify it.
849:Please do not modify it.
833:19:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
801:Please do not modify it.
785:18:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
425:the subject, not things
300:Please do not modify it.
284:19:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
252:Please do not modify it.
111:Please do not modify it.
43:Deletion review archives
2341:23:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
2324:16:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
2296:15:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
2275:11:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
2258:11:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
2207:13:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
2176:02:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
2163:20:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
2142:13:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
2124:07:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
2112:04:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
2079:23:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
2065:22:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
2030:19:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
2000:17:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1984:13:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1964:12:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1942:12:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1930:10:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1911:10:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1895:10:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1873:10:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1856:10:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1837:10:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1814:08:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1798:06:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1780:01:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1728:11:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1719:10:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1704:08:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1694:01:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1673:01:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1465:05:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
1452:02:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
1438:15:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1416:02:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
1401:13:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1373:03:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1351:02:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1336:01:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1306:02:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1282:01:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1261:01:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1232:01:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1130:19:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1105:17:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1089:12:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1063:10:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1046:06:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1026:03:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
1009:02:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
992:02:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
969:02:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
940:02:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
763:04:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
740:20:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
714:13:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
691:20:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
660:14:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
645:11:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
618:14:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
603:13:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
561:04:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
544:22:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
523:21:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
503:14:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
489:18:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
456:18:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
438:17:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
414:17:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
397:16:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
236:22:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
200:22:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
95:22:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
2619:at 10:07, May 16, 2008
1844:Very reluctant restore
1526:of the article above.
1504:– Deletion endorsed –
861:Hero Certified Burgers
846:of the article above.
817:Hero Certified Burgers
297:of the article above.
123:Encyclopedia Dramatica
108:of the article above.
77:Encyclopedia Dramatica
2708:" in Australia; etc.
2663:Has released a Single
1359:. One of them is the
2825:Keep deleted for now
2675:remind you of anyone
1214:and perhaps get the
1880:dihydrogen monoxide
1822:dihydrogen monoxide
1658:dihydrogen monoxide
978:notability criteria
706:Delicious carbuncle
595:Delicious carbuncle
1341:allow recreation.
216:Essjay controversy
193:User:Urban Rose/ED
2907:
2906:
2860:the draft article
2858:. - please check
2758:the draft article
2621:
2588:the draft article
2354:Corey Worthington
2320:
2195:WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY
2063:
2015:Jamie Lynn Spears
1969:Reluctant Restore
1893:
1835:
1671:
1492:
1491:
1179:: Yes it is. The
1121:to begin with. --
1087:
1035:Billy Goat Tavern
808:
807:
777:Drumzandspace2000
689:
652:Drumzandspace2000
643:
610:Drumzandspace2000
581:Drumzandspace2000
553:Drumzandspace2000
542:
495:Drumzandspace2000
469:secondary sources
448:Drumzandspace2000
389:Drumzandspace2000
259:
258:
93:
60:
59:
2911:
2902:
2873:Endorse deletion
2837:
2779:
2735:
2713:
2626:Endorse deletion
2610:
2506:Endorse deletion
2333:Peregrine Fisher
2321:
2318:
2313:
2307:
2057:
2051:. Vapid waster.
2045:
2044:
1883:
1825:
1768:allow recreation
1661:
1596:
1582:
1564:
1531:
1510:
1494:
1487:
1444:Pocopocopocopoco
1423:Endorse Deletion
1408:Pocopocopocopoco
1398:
1393:
1388:
1365:Pocopocopocopoco
1357:on their website
1328:Pocopocopocopoco
1298:Pocopocopocopoco
1290:Pocopocopocopoco
1253:Pocopocopocopoco
1224:Pocopocopocopoco
1094:Endorse deletion
1083:
997:Endorse deletion
989:
984:
966:
961:
956:
932:Pocopocopocopoco
916:
902:
884:
851:
810:
803:
738:
734:
727:
679:
633:
536:
367:
353:
335:
302:
261:
254:
233:
228:
178:
164:
146:
113:
87:
70:
56:
36:
31:
2919:
2918:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2898:
2895:deletion review
2828:
2777:John Vandenberg
2775:
2733:John Vandenberg
2731:
2711:John Vandenberg
2709:
2615:
2457:Graeme Bartlett
2317:
2311:
2305:
1889:
1831:
1667:
1605:
1599:
1592:
1591:
1585:
1555:
1539:
1527:
1524:deletion review
1506:
1483:
1480:deletion review
1396:
1391:
1386:
1237:The Toronto Sun
1031:Endorse closure
1014:Endorse closure
987:
982:
964:
959:
954:
925:
919:
912:
911:
905:
875:
859:
847:
844:deletion review
799:
796:deletion review
737:
732:
725:
723:
465:primary sources
382:
376:
370:
363:
362:
356:
326:
310:
298:
295:deletion review
250:
247:deletion review
231:
226:
187:
181:
174:
173:
167:
137:
121:
109:
106:deletion review
68:
61:
54:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2917:
2915:
2905:
2904:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2866:
2842:
2841:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2740:
2739:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2717:
2700:
2699:
2684:
2683:
2682:
2681:
2678:
2671:
2664:
2661:
2652:
2651:
2642:
2641:
2623:
2613:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2602:
2566:
2565:
2538:
2520:
2503:
2485:
2467:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2425:
2419:
2406:
2405:
2396:
2395:
2375:Endorse delete
2372:
2343:
2326:
2298:
2277:
2265:as per nom. --
2260:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2179:
2178:
2144:
2134:124.171.16.116
2126:
2114:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2046:
2032:
2003:
2002:
1986:
1966:
1945:
1932:
1913:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1887:
1858:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1829:
1800:
1782:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1745:
1706:
1665:
1654:
1653:
1615:4 February DRV
1607:
1606:
1603:
1597:
1589:
1583:
1534:
1533:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1490:
1489:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1234:
1189:
1170:
1160:
1139:
1138:
1132:
1107:
1091:
1072:if and only if
1065:
1048:
1028:
1011:
994:
971:
927:
926:
923:
917:
909:
903:
854:
853:
838:
837:
836:
835:
806:
805:
790:
789:
788:
787:
768:
767:
766:
765:
743:
742:
729:
716:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
665:
664:
663:
662:
622:
621:
620:
605:
546:
525:
507:
506:
505:
458:
440:
429:the subject.
416:
384:
383:
380:
374:
368:
360:
354:
312:Demetria_Clark
305:
304:
289:
288:
287:
286:
268:Demetria_Clark
257:
256:
241:
240:
239:
238:
220:
219:
210:
209:
189:
188:
185:
179:
171:
165:
116:
115:
100:
99:
98:
97:
67:
62:
58:
57:
49:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2916:
2903:
2901:
2896:
2891:
2890:
2885:
2882:
2878:
2874:
2871:
2870:
2865:
2861:
2857:
2853:
2850:According to
2849:
2846:
2845:
2844:
2843:
2840:
2836:
2833:
2832:
2826:
2823:
2819:
2815:
2811:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2802:
2797:
2793:
2790:
2789:
2782:
2778:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2738:
2734:
2729:
2725:
2722:
2721:
2716:
2712:
2707:
2702:
2701:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2686:
2685:
2679:
2676:
2672:
2669:
2665:
2662:
2660:
2656:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2649:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2627:
2624:
2622:
2620:
2617:
2607:
2606:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2564:
2560:
2556:
2551:
2546:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2533:
2529:
2524:
2521:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2507:
2504:
2502:
2498:
2494:
2489:
2486:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2429:
2426:
2423:
2420:
2417:
2413:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2403:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2385:69.140.152.55
2382:
2381:
2380:WP:Do no harm
2376:
2373:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2358:Corey Delaney
2355:
2351:
2347:
2344:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2327:
2325:
2322:
2314:
2308:
2302:
2299:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2278:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2261:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2244:
2243:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2193:). Moreover,
2192:
2187:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2177:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2130:
2127:
2125:
2122:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2061:
2056:
2055:
2050:
2047:
2043:
2041:
2039:
2036:
2033:
2031:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2019:no objections
2016:
2012:
2008:
2005:
2004:
2001:
1998:
1996:
1995:
1990:
1987:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1976:
1970:
1967:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1946:
1943:
1940:
1936:
1933:
1931:
1928:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1914:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1903:
1900:
1896:
1891:
1882:
1881:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1859:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1842:
1838:
1833:
1824:
1823:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1801:
1799:
1796:
1795:
1790:
1786:
1783:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1766:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1669:
1660:
1659:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1646:
1641:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1618:
1616:
1612:
1602:
1595:
1588:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1563:
1559:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1541:Corey Delaney
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1525:
1520:
1519:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1503:
1502:
1501:Corey Delaney
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1488:
1486:
1481:
1476:
1475:
1466:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1430:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1383:
1380:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1235:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1222:if you like.
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1115:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
995:
993:
990:
985:
979:
975:
972:
970:
967:
962:
957:
951:
947:
944:
943:
942:
941:
937:
933:
922:
915:
908:
900:
896:
892:
888:
883:
879:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
857:
856:
855:
852:
850:
845:
840:
839:
834:
831:
827:
823:
819:
818:
814:
813:
812:
811:
804:
802:
797:
792:
791:
786:
782:
778:
773:
770:
769:
764:
761:
757:
753:
750:
747:
746:
745:
744:
741:
736:
735:
728:
726:Corvus cornix
721:
717:
715:
711:
707:
703:
700:
699:
692:
687:
683:
678:
677:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
661:
657:
653:
648:
647:
646:
641:
637:
632:
631:
626:
623:
619:
615:
611:
606:
604:
600:
596:
592:
589:
586:
582:
578:
575:
572:
568:
567:Drumsandspace
564:
563:
562:
558:
554:
550:
547:
545:
540:
535:
534:
529:
526:
524:
520:
516:
511:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
487:
483:
479:
474:
470:
466:
462:
459:
457:
453:
449:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
433:
428:
424:
420:
417:
415:
412:
410:
409:
404:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
379:
373:
366:
359:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
330:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
301:
296:
291:
290:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
265:
264:
263:
262:
255:
253:
248:
243:
242:
237:
234:
229:
222:
221:
217:
212:
211:
207:
204:
203:
202:
201:
198:
197:ViperSnake151
194:
184:
177:
170:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
118:
117:
114:
112:
107:
102:
101:
96:
91:
86:
85:
80:
78:
74:
73:
72:
71:
66:
63:
53:
48:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
2899:
2892:
2872:
2855:
2847:
2830:
2824:
2791:
2753:
2745:
2724:Keep deleted
2723:
2706:Generation Z
2668:Generation Z
2647:
2625:
2618:
2611:
2583:
2582:which says:
2575:
2571:
2544:
2540:
2522:
2505:
2487:
2469:
2452:
2437:
2427:
2421:
2416:thee article
2411:
2401:
2378:
2374:
2345:
2328:
2300:
2279:
2262:
2245:
2173:Orderinchaos
2168:
2146:
2128:
2117:Keep deleted
2116:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2052:
2049:Keep deleted
2048:
2034:
2018:
2006:
1993:
1988:
1973:
1968:
1952:Orderinchaos
1948:Keep Deleted
1947:
1935:Keep Deleted
1934:
1915:
1905:
1901:
1878:
1860:
1848:Nick Dowling
1843:
1820:
1811:Orderinchaos
1803:Keep deleted
1802:
1793:
1785:Keep deleted
1784:
1767:
1701:Orderinchaos
1686:
1678:
1656:
1655:
1642:
1619:
1608:
1528:
1521:
1507:
1499:
1484:
1477:
1427:
1422:
1381:
1361:Toronto Star
1324:Toronto Star
1314:
1269:
1240:
1236:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1166:
1162:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1134:
1118:
1113:
1109:
1098:
1093:
1080:UltraExactZZ
1071:
1067:
1050:
1030:
1013:
996:
973:
945:
928:
848:
841:
824:endorsed. –
821:
815:
800:
793:
771:
748:
730:
701:
675:
629:
624:
587:
573:
548:
531:
527:
515:Kevin Murray
509:
472:
460:
442:
431:
426:
422:
418:
407:
402:
385:
299:
292:
272:
266:
251:
244:
205:
190:
110:
103:
82:
79:(yet again.)
75:
64:
2792:Status note
2750:George Bush
2728:opportunity
2303:per DHMO.
2011:WP:ONEEVENT
1687:Big Brother
1652:ultimately.
1630:Big Brother
1622:news.com.au
1245:Toronto Sun
1210:as well as
1114:requirement
2631:Hammersoft
2473:article.--
2319:Disclaimer
1794:Black Kite
1183:s and the
1018:BlueValour
471:have said
408:Smashville
65:7 May 2008
2528:JayKeaton
2331:- nom. -
2250:SmokeyJoe
2090:notoriety
2017:. I have
1939:Lankiveil
1725:Hesperian
1691:Hesperian
1216:WP:RESCUE
1188:creation.
2657:Has has
2586:- check
2523:Recreate
2470:Restore.
2453:Recreate
2329:Recreate
2301:Recreate
2288:Davewild
2267:WikiCats
2246:Overturn
2225:Oakshade
2155:Oakshade
2151:WP:MUSIC
2023:Dhartung
1994:Celarnor
1956:Eusebeus
1920:WP:BLP1E
1807:WP:BLP1E
1789:WP:MUSIC
1645:WP:BLP1E
1458:Dhartung
1270:question
1241:Response
1204:Response
1177:Response
1167:Response
1153:Response
1123:Dhartung
1099:Celarnor
1085:Evidence
1039:Dhartung
822:Deletion
756:Dhartung
686:Contribs
676:lifebaka
640:Contribs
630:lifebaka
591:contribs
577:contribs
482:Dhartung
432:Celarnor
273:Deletion
47:2008 May
20: |
2848:Comment
2801:GRBerry
2746:Comment
2648:Comment
2572:Comment
2510:MrPrada
2488:Comment
2475:PeaceNT
2402:Comment
2360:there.
2263:Restore
2199:JoshuaZ
2147:Restore
2129:Restore
2086:Comment
2071:JoshuaZ
2035:comment
2007:Restore
1989:Restore
1954:above.
1907:Sceptre
1772:JoshuaZ
1587:restore
1558:protect
1553:history
1382:Comment
1343:JoshuaZ
1274:JoshuaZ
1249:Toronto
1110:Comment
1068:Endorse
1051:Endorse
983:Rodhull
946:Comment
907:restore
878:protect
873:history
772:Comment
749:Comment
702:Endorse
625:Endorse
549:Comment
528:Endorse
510:Comment
461:Endorse
443:Comment
419:Endorse
403:Endorse
358:restore
329:protect
324:history
206:Comment
169:restore
140:protect
135:history
2835:scribe
2810:Daniel
2762:Fosnez
2689:Fosnez
2592:Fosnez
2555:Daniel
2493:Andjam
2439:Fosnez
2362:Fosnez
2306:Keeper
2284:WP:BIO
2186:WP:BIO
2104:voter
1735:Fosnez
1626:source
1562:delete
1220:WP:IAR
1185:Delete
1055:Stifle
988:andemu
974:Uphold
882:delete
826:Splash
752:WP:AGF
579:) and
333:delete
277:Splash
144:delete
2121:Sarah
2094:keeps
2060:Help!
1927:garra
1594:cache
1579:views
1571:watch
1567:links
1508:Nakon
914:cache
899:views
891:watch
887:links
539:Help!
473:about
423:about
378:AfD 2
365:cache
350:views
342:watch
338:links
227:Urban
176:cache
161:views
153:watch
149:links
90:Help!
55:: -->
52:May 8
38:May 6
16:<
2881:talk
2864:WP:N
2852:WP:N
2814:talk
2766:talk
2693:talk
2635:talk
2612:east
2596:talk
2580:WP:N
2559:talk
2545:wait
2543:and
2532:talk
2514:talk
2497:talk
2479:talk
2461:talk
2443:talk
2389:talk
2377:per
2366:talk
2346:Move
2337:talk
2292:talk
2271:talk
2254:talk
2229:talk
2203:talk
2191:WP:N
2169:this
2159:talk
2138:talk
2109:Suro
2106:Satu
2102:wait
2075:talk
2027:Talk
1980:talk
1960:talk
1950:per
1924:Gnan
1916:Wait
1902:Wait
1869:talk
1861:Wait
1852:talk
1776:talk
1753:talk
1739:talk
1715:talk
1634:here
1575:logs
1549:talk
1545:edit
1462:Talk
1448:talk
1434:talk
1412:talk
1397:Love
1387:Lara
1369:talk
1347:talk
1332:talk
1302:talk
1294:talk
1278:talk
1257:talk
1228:talk
1181:Keep
1127:Talk
1059:talk
1043:Talk
1022:talk
1005:talk
1001:Kesh
976:per
965:Love
955:Lara
950:here
936:talk
895:logs
869:talk
865:edit
781:talk
760:Talk
733:talk
710:talk
682:Talk
656:talk
636:Talk
614:talk
599:talk
585:talk
571:talk
557:talk
519:talk
499:talk
486:Talk
452:talk
393:talk
346:logs
320:talk
316:edit
232:Rose
157:logs
131:talk
127:edit
35:<
2831:WjB
2616:718
2352:to
2315:|
2309:|
2054:Guy
1975:DGG
1865:JRG
1749:JRG
1711:JRG
1601:AfD
1429:DGG
1076:nit
921:AfD
533:Guy
372:AfD
183:AfD
84:Guy
22:Log
2879:|
2877:cj
2816:)
2768:)
2748:-
2695:)
2637:)
2598:)
2561:)
2534:)
2516:)
2499:)
2481:)
2463:)
2445:)
2391:)
2368:)
2339:)
2312:76
2294:)
2273:)
2256:)
2231:)
2205:)
2161:)
2140:)
2098:or
2077:)
2025:|
1982:)
1962:)
1904:.
1871:)
1854:)
1778:)
1755:)
1741:)
1717:)
1640:.
1577:|
1573:|
1569:|
1565:|
1560:|
1556:|
1551:|
1547:|
1460:|
1450:)
1436:)
1414:)
1371:)
1349:)
1334:)
1304:)
1280:)
1259:)
1251:.
1239:.
1230:)
1202:.
1198:,
1194:,
1175:.
1165:.
1151:-
1147:,
1125:|
1078:.
1061:)
1041:|
1024:)
1007:)
938:)
897:|
893:|
889:|
885:|
880:|
876:|
871:|
867:|
830:tk
828:-
820:–
783:)
758:|
712:)
684:-
673:--
658:)
638:-
616:)
601:)
559:)
521:)
501:)
484:|
454:)
427:by
395:)
348:|
344:|
340:|
336:|
331:|
327:|
322:|
318:|
281:tk
279:-
271:–
159:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
45::
2812:(
2764:(
2704:"
2691:(
2677:?
2670:"
2633:(
2614:.
2594:(
2557:(
2530:(
2512:(
2495:(
2477:(
2459:(
2441:(
2418:.
2387:(
2364:(
2335:(
2290:(
2269:(
2252:(
2227:(
2201:(
2157:(
2136:(
2073:(
2062:)
2058:(
1978:(
1958:(
1944:.
1892:)
1890:O
1888:2
1886:H
1884:(
1867:(
1850:(
1834:)
1832:O
1830:2
1828:H
1826:(
1774:(
1751:(
1737:(
1713:(
1670:)
1668:O
1666:2
1664:H
1662:(
1604:)
1598:|
1590:|
1584:(
1581:)
1543:(
1446:(
1432:(
1410:(
1392:❤
1367:(
1345:(
1330:(
1300:(
1292:(
1276:(
1255:(
1226:(
1157:s
1137:-
1082:~
1057:(
1020:(
1003:(
960:❤
934:(
924:)
918:|
910:|
904:(
901:)
863:(
779:(
708:(
688:)
680:(
654:(
642:)
634:(
612:(
597:(
588:·
583:(
574:·
569:(
555:(
541:)
537:(
517:(
497:(
450:(
391:(
381:)
375:|
369:|
361:|
355:(
352:)
314:(
214:"
186:)
180:|
172:|
166:(
163:)
125:(
92:)
88:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.