312:
enough to pass G4, hoping this time for a sensible decision. Alternatively, combine the three, emphasising the outside sources for 2006 & finding some for the others. There might also be some on the general topic. Or reduce in size and add to the list of episodes, in the parts discussing the whole seasons before getting to the individual ones.
181:
Although, admittedly, a consensus was effectively formed to delete the 1998 and 2002 election articles, I'm not convinced there was a consensus for the 2006 article. A few delete voters in the AfD said they regarded the 2006 election as a special case, as it contained some real world information.
311:
such was the consensus, unfortunately. However, it might well have been better to relist 2006 separately, as having less consensus. I suggest simply recreation in a more compact form, and with references or additional references relating it to real life, which will meet the objections well
293:
I, too, would have been a "keep" !vote, at least re 2006 (but then my Aaron Sorkin fandom is such that I'd want to keep anything with which he is associated), but no close but "delete" can be contemplated here; even if Kusma's and C mon's !votes, captioned "delete", are construed as "keep" with
197:
As the instructions on the deletion review page indicate, many issues can be resolved by asking the deleting/closing administrator for an explanation and/or to reconsider his/her decision. While not strictly mandatory, this should normally be done first. Did you try, and if not, was there some
164:
152:
173:
250:
It's very hard to fault
Backslash Forwardslash for closing that debate as "delete". Both the numerical !vote count and the weight of argument supported his decision there.—
48:
34:
43:
78:. See the discussion for some suggestions of how a recreation could be created that would not be subject to speedy deletion under criterion
39:
122:
261:
21:
118:
70:
334:
102:
17:
243:
323:
303:
285:
268:
245:
224:
207:
191:
91:
258:
87:
299:
187:
236:
276:
I'd certainly have !voted to keep the 2006 one, but there is no other way to read that AfD.
220:
203:
79:
281:
251:
83:
319:
295:
183:
216:
199:
277:
314:
215:
by default due to nominator's failure to respond to a reasonable query.
159:
145:
137:
129:
294:respect to the 2006 article, consensus is clear.
8:
101:The following is an archived debate of the
63:
119:The West Wing presidential election, 2006
71:The West Wing presidential election, 2006
234:, correct interpretation of consensus. –
7:
337:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
333:The above is an archive of the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
92:02:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
324:19:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
304:19:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
286:02:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
269:20:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
246:19:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
225:08:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
208:19:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
192:18:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
360:
340:Please do not modify it.
108:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
105:of the article above.
347:
346:
76:Deletion endorsed
351:
342:
266:
256:
239:
213:Endorse deletion
198:special reason?
176:
171:
162:
148:
140:
132:
110:
64:
53:
33:
359:
358:
354:
353:
352:
350:
349:
348:
338:
335:deletion review
265:
262:
252:
237:
172:
170:
167:
158:
157:
151:
144:
143:
136:
135:
128:
127:
106:
103:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
357:
355:
345:
344:
329:
328:
327:
326:
306:
288:
271:
263:
248:
229:
228:
227:
179:
178:
168:
155:
149:
141:
133:
125:
113:
112:
97:
96:
95:
94:
61:
59:24 August 2009
56:
49:2009 August 25
47:
38:
35:2009 August 23
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
356:
343:
341:
336:
331:
330:
325:
321:
317:
316:
310:
307:
305:
301:
297:
292:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
267:
259:
257:
255:
249:
247:
244:
241:
240:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
196:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
175:
166:
161:
154:
147:
139:
131:
124:
120:
117:
116:
115:
114:
111:
109:
104:
99:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
339:
332:
313:
308:
290:
273:
253:
238:Juliancolton
235:
231:
212:
180:
107:
100:
75:
69:
58:
44:2009 August
254:S Marshall
84:Eluchil404
184:Ribbet32
20: |
309:Endorse
291:Endorse
274:Endorse
232:Endorse
174:restore
138:history
217:Stifle
200:Stifle
320:talk
278:Hobit
160:watch
153:links
52:: -->
16:<
300:talk
282:talk
264:Cont
221:talk
204:talk
188:talk
146:logs
130:edit
123:talk
88:talk
82:. –
32:<
315:DGG
296:Joe
165:XfD
163:) (
22:Log
322:)
302:)
284:)
242:|
223:)
206:)
190:)
90:)
80:G4
74:–
42::
318:(
298:(
280:(
260:/
219:(
202:(
186:(
177:)
169:|
156:|
150:|
142:|
134:|
126:|
121:(
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.