Knowledge (XXG)

:Deletion review/Log/2009 August 9 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source πŸ“

195:). The article as it stands has two sources IMDB and Fluge, the latter is a user editable resource, so I can go there now and type in any old crap - it isn't reliable. IMDB is reliable for some information (and other stuff is again user contributed so again me their adding any old garbage) but generally only as a directory listing which isn't sufficient for establishing notability. See also 402:(the creator of the article). We needed more time to discuss it and the discussion was clearly not done, yet the administrator closed it. PS I've emailed the admin, but haven't gotten a response. I believe this user is taking a break because of the message on his user page, so I'm going ahead and doing this.-- 549:
i think that the page should be deleted because their ain't that much information to make a full article and the movie was never made i want it to be deleted i serched not that much inforation to come to a full article i don't think a full article will help who agrees with me that i should'nt have a
214:
The actors, the people behind the film seem to be authentic. The film seems to be in Post Production. I am a member of Knowledge (XXG):Films and henceforth its my duty to see that the right kind of stuff is put up. Atleast, the article does not qualify for deletion. It may require a bit of polishing
163:
The article meets the notability criteria and shuold not be deleted. I being a new page patroller checked the sources and found them to be reliable. However, a user placed an afd tag on the article. Please review the article and check whether it qualifies for deletion.
417:
Merging or moving are editorial decisions and require no administrative intervention. So just start a discussion on merging or renaming on the articles talk page, once consensus is reached the relevant editiorial action can be done.
182:
it hasn't been deleted yet, so there is nothing to review. You should just comment in the AFD as the correct venue to decide if the notability criteria are met. It sounds like you need to brush up on what constitutes a
397:
and deleting the article others have the idea, but haven't said where to put it. They are was another user saying to rename it Holmes-advertisement controversy. The only real person saying to keep it as it is was
393:
and either should be renamed or merged. We didn't even get to decide where because the closing administrator closed it before we could even argue to where we should put it. I support merging it with
436:. Not too many merges, not too many deletes. No consensus seems reasonable, and as 82.7.40.7 says, merge debates should take place on talk pages. This isn't really a matter for Deletion Review. 372: 48: 467: 34: 139: 43: 154: 394: 566: 39: 360: 230:
There is little point in posting here, it's been closed. Why don't you comment on the AFD itself? I'll also note your comment "film
21: 419: 247: 200: 196: 381: 238:
to be in post production". Notabilty is not the same as existance, and wikipedia doesn't deal with "seems" it deals with
582: 534: 490: 310: 266: 89: 17: 109: 511: 562: 470:
may be useful reading. The questions of whether to merge or rename and where should be resolved before acting.
105: 70: 554: 570: 523: 479: 445: 427: 411: 299: 255: 224: 208: 173: 78: 558: 423: 251: 220: 204: 169: 403: 550:
full page i would have liked to see it but it never happened so it does not disurve a full page
475: 407: 330: 441: 516: 292: 192: 243: 184: 216: 165: 239: 188: 471: 433: 399: 520: 390: 326: 296: 287: 75: 437: 389:
There was complete consensus on the fact the article should not be under
295:- unless you are arguing for deletion DRV has no locus here – 215:
though, the guy who created the article needs to be informed.
74:– Hasn't been deleted so deletion review is kinda premature – 367: 353: 345: 337: 146: 132: 124: 116: 450:
I see substantial opposition to a standalone article (
8: 197:Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(films)#Resources 533:The following is an archived debate of the 309:The following is an archived debate of the 88:The following is an archived debate of the 504: 280: 63: 432:There were keeps from 69.134.163.9 and 395:Health care reform in the United States 519:is where this needs to be discussed – 199:point 1 is specifically about IMDB -- 7: 191:(more specifically for future films 585:of the page listed in the heading. 493:of the page listed in the heading. 269:of the page listed in the heading. 28: 581:The above is an archive of the 489:The above is an archive of the 265:The above is an archive of the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review 1: 462:is correct, and non-specific 466:is within admin discretion. 524:14:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 480:04:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 446:00:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 300:14:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 608: 571:22:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 428:17:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 412:17:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 256:14:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 225:10:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 209:08:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 174:06:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 79:09:35, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 512:Godzilla vs. Frankenstein 588:Please do not modify it. 540:Please do not modify it. 496:Please do not modify it. 316:Please do not modify it. 272:Please do not modify it. 234:to be authentic", "film 95:Please do not modify it. 40:Deletion review archives 106:Possessions (film 2009) 71:Possessions (film 2009) 537:of the article above. 460:no consensus to delete 313:of the article above. 92:of the article above. 187:and what constitutes 595: 594: 574: 557:comment added by 503: 502: 458:s together), but 279: 278: 599: 590: 573: 551: 542: 505: 498: 384: 379: 370: 356: 348: 340: 318: 281: 274: 244:reliable sources 159: 157: 149: 135: 127: 119: 97: 64: 53: 33: 607: 606: 602: 601: 600: 598: 597: 596: 586: 583:deletion review 552: 538: 535:deletion review 494: 491:deletion review 380: 378: 375: 366: 365: 359: 352: 351: 344: 343: 336: 335: 314: 311:deletion review 270: 267:deletion review 240:verifiable fact 185:reliable source 153: 151: 145: 144: 138: 131: 130: 123: 122: 115: 114: 93: 90:deletion review 62: 55: 54: 51: 46: 37: 31: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 605: 603: 593: 592: 577: 576: 559:Cloverbeatme!! 545: 544: 529: 528: 527: 526: 501: 500: 485: 484: 483: 482: 448: 430: 387: 386: 376: 363: 357: 349: 341: 333: 321: 320: 305: 304: 303: 302: 277: 276: 261: 260: 259: 258: 212: 211: 161: 160: 142: 136: 128: 120: 112: 100: 99: 84: 83: 82: 81: 61: 56: 49:2009 August 10 47: 38: 30: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 604: 591: 589: 584: 579: 578: 575: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 547: 546: 543: 541: 536: 531: 530: 525: 522: 518: 514: 513: 509: 508: 507: 506: 499: 497: 492: 487: 486: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 447: 443: 439: 435: 434:User:BalthCat 431: 429: 425: 421: 416: 415: 414: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400:User:Geo Swan 396: 392: 383: 374: 369: 362: 355: 347: 339: 332: 328: 325: 324: 323: 322: 319: 317: 312: 307: 306: 301: 298: 294: 291:– Please see 290: 289: 285: 284: 283: 282: 275: 273: 268: 263: 262: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 228: 227: 226: 222: 218: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 181: 178: 177: 176: 175: 171: 167: 156: 148: 141: 134: 126: 118: 111: 107: 104: 103: 102: 101: 98: 96: 91: 86: 85: 80: 77: 73: 72: 68: 67: 66: 65: 60: 59:9 August 2009 57: 50: 45: 41: 36: 35:2009 August 8 23: 19: 587: 580: 548: 539: 532: 510: 495: 488: 464:no consensus 463: 459: 455: 451: 391:Shona Holmes 388: 327:Shona Holmes 315: 308: 288:Shona Holmes 286: 271: 264: 235: 231: 213: 180:Speedy close 179: 162: 94: 87: 69: 58: 553:β€”Preceding 44:2009 August 189:notability 420:82.7.40.7 248:82.7.40.7 217:Nefirious 201:82.7.40.7 166:Nefirious 567:contribs 555:unsigned 472:Flatscan 20:‎ | 521:Spartaz 404:Fire 55 382:restore 346:history 297:Spartaz 155:restore 125:history 76:Spartaz 517:WP:AFD 468:WP:N3D 454:s and 452:delete 438:John Z 293:WP:ND3 193:WP:NFF 456:merge 368:watch 361:links 242:from 236:seems 147:watch 140:links 52:: --> 16:< 563:talk 476:talk 442:talk 424:talk 408:talk 354:logs 338:edit 331:talk 252:talk 232:seem 221:talk 205:talk 170:talk 133:logs 117:edit 110:talk 32:< 373:XfD 371:) ( 22:Log 569:) 565:β€’ 515:– 478:) 444:) 426:) 418:-- 410:) 254:) 246:-- 223:) 207:) 172:) 42:: 561:( 474:( 440:( 422:( 406:( 385:) 377:| 364:| 358:| 350:| 342:| 334:| 329:( 250:( 219:( 203:( 168:( 158:) 152:( 150:) 143:| 137:| 129:| 121:| 113:| 108:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
Log
2009 August 8
Deletion review archives
2009 August
2009 August 10
9 August 2009
Possessions (film 2009)
Spartaz
09:35, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
deletion review
Possessions (film 2009)
talk
edit
history
logs
links
watch
restore
Nefirious
talk
06:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
reliable source
notability
WP:NFF
Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(films)#Resources
82.7.40.7
talk
08:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Nefirious

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑