1097:, which is what this was, and is, used as. (The Indonesian Knowledge (XXG) even classifies its equivalent as such, even though we didn't.) I don't see any discussion in the TFD discussion of why readers should not be able to find one "the Great" from another, or why the common navigation elements of these various articles' "See also" sections, linking other "the Greats" as "See also" articles, shouldn't be put into a template in order to aid consistency and maintenance. Do you?
874:
their names, but the fact is that they do indeed have that title in common. And that is exactly what is the point of this template. Some rulers are generally known for "the Great" in their titles and this template serves to provide information about the wide variety of examples of this usage of this title. Furthermore it seems like a very shaky foundation to call the deletion of this template a
931:. So I guess what I should have done when I oppose a TFD is, instead of going the bureaucratic way, was to have just reinstated the templates manually? As that would have at least sparked the interest of the people who actually maintains the articles instead of the handful of people that frequents the TFD? --
224:
criminal allegations that led to charges in the late 1970s and second as the first cloner of pets. In 1978 there was massive UK news coverage about her. That she doubtless leads a good and pleasant life today is not the aspects about her life that are notable, despite, presumably, being verifiable.
873:
Rulers known as "the Great" of page|reason=The reason for deleting this page was that there is no connection between the rulers who have appended the phrase "the Great" to their name. There is no doubt that there is generally little or no historical parallel between the rulers who have this title to
185:
and wish to move it over the salted page. I imagine the original deletion was because of the controversial nature of the subject. BLP is stated as the reason. But correct citation and non inclusion of libellous drivel ought to allow the page to be part of
Knowledge (XXG). Naturally I am content
383:. I see the point that people are making. I will redraft the article as a document about the event over the next few days. Thank you all for your guidance. I don't necessarily agree with you but I see no reason to argue further against a solidly building consensus now I see the basis of it.
223:
Knowledge (XXG) is not about fairness. It is about documenting in an encyclopaedic manner that facts as seen as verifiable and notable in reliable sources. One cannot exclude things as a matter of taste. This person has hit the news in two ways, first as a highly notable and verifiable set of
945:
I've struck your "oppose deletion" comment, because by listing here, it is already clear that you oppose the deletion of the template. Placing additional bolded "votes" may make it appear as though your position has more support than it actually does. Please prefix additional comments with
1099:
There's also scant evidence that the people arguing that such a connection between all these articles was original research really looked at the template itself, or indeed followed the TFD nomination, otherwise they would have followed the link at the top of the template to
1149:
says that the grouping is original research, but that would seem to have only weak application to what is, in essence, no more than a collection of ordinary "See also" links, and again be an article argument not a navigation template one.
355:
can be found. The person, however, seems streched - not because the article is "all negative" (there are notable people with few or no redeeming features) but because the person is not notable outside the context of the single event.
606:(if there are people who disagree, I think it's at least worth an extensive mention in the now-parent company. (that article should cite the business article about the acquisition rather than a press release) -
1132:
argument is made - nobody goes and deals with the other stuff. The TFD consensus is clear, and it seems equally clear that they knew they were opining on the deletion of a navigation template.
853:
308:, avoided celebrity, and is not a person whose life and works have been publicly documented. She also maintains that the portrayal of her by the tabloid press in the 1970s is far from accurate.
1128:- though many of them suggested that the article probably should also be deleted. But they didn't go so far as to nominate it themselves - but that is a common behavior pattern in AFD when an
865:
400:
would it be possible, please,for me to see the original deleted article in case it has any relevant references in it? Email will be fine for that. If no refs please do not bother.
31:
568:
318:(ISBN 9780415147262), which doesn't cover this as if it were a biography. It covers it on page 489, in its entry for "sex scandals". Other sources, similarly, cover this as a
268:
we do have many notorious folk documented on WP, by no means all of whom are no longer living. And this person received substantial news coverage for each of her exploits.
964:… or don't prefix them with anything at all. Closing administrators can read, and can tell when a simple discussion contribution is just that, without any boldfaced words.
1006:
page is more suitable. (in that case the template history needs to be moved into articlespace without a redirect prior to creation to sort out attribution requirements). -
422:. ☺ I don't think that deleted content will be of any use to you. You are already beyond it. What will be of use to you now are more sources, of which there are some.
58:
44:
53:
552:
1002:. The TFD asserted that the template linked together rules that are unrelated through encyclopedic or historical rather than lexicographical means. Perhaps a
588:
is notable. I have rewritten the article in my userspace and present it to the community to decide whether or not it deserves inclusion on
Knowledge (XXG).
330:
581:
574:
560:
322:(variously the "Manacled Mormon", the "Mormon sex-slave case", the "Mormon sex-in-chains case", and so forth). There's some scope for writing about this
301:
1124:
Contrary to Uncle G's comment, reading the TFD, most of the opiners clearly differentiated between the template that they were discussing and the
157:
49:
829:
1065:
699:
1125:
1101:
820:
769:
371:
837:
21:
208:. Also, since she was never actually convicted, it is inappropriate to make the accusation no matter how well sourced it is. -
172:
1129:
360:
could be contested on grounds of the cloned dog, but this being the same person is a question of speculation and uncertainty.
186:
that people enhance the stub while it sits in "my" user space. I do not have admin rights so cannot see the deleted page.
519:
1172:
804:
748:
528:
503:
462:
265:
107:
17:
875:
536:
182:
419:
436:
Many thanks. In that case let us close this review as withdrawn and move towards
Featured Article status ☺
1080:
1011:
955:
915:
901:
733:
611:
490:
287:
248:
213:
92:
1159:
1136:
1113:
1084:
1067:
1051:
1030:
1013:
994:
973:
959:
940:
919:
905:
887:
793:
737:
720:
701:
683:
667:
648:
627:
613:
597:
492:
445:
431:
409:
392:
375:
342:
291:
277:
252:
233:
215:
195:
96:
1063:
716:
697:
365:
936:
883:
712:
1142:
618:
Thanks for the suggestion! I've added some of the acquisition information into the parent article.
127:
333:: Not everything in Knowledge (XXG) requires presentation in the form of a biographical article.
1076:
1026:
1007:
729:
663:
644:
619:
607:
589:
486:
441:
405:
388:
351:, agreeing with Uncle G, the event seems notable and probably motivates an article if sufficient
273:
229:
209:
191:
357:
205:
1155:
1146:
1109:
1060:
969:
694:
427:
338:
302:
Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons#Articles about people notable only for one event
1059:- There was clear consensus at the TfD, and I see no valid reason to overturn the deletion. –
1038:, reason given for overturning is not procedural or policy-related, this is not TfD round 2.
896:, which was unanimous. Most TFDs don't get even that many comments. DRV is not TFD round 2.
788:
623:
593:
361:
990:
932:
879:
857:
556:
352:
314:, not the person, in cases such as this. Take your cue from another encyclopaedia, the
305:
678:
123:
83:
1075:
no matter which way you can spin it, a 5-0 vote for deletion in a TfD is a consensus.
1046:
1040:
1022:
659:
640:
437:
401:
384:
269:
225:
187:
1151:
1133:
1105:
965:
423:
334:
418:
had more than that at the beginning of this discussion. I note the existence of
282:
I think Uncle G expressed what I'd like to say far better than I possibly could.
951:
911:
897:
777:
728:
meets the notability requirements, and is nicely written and presented to boot.
283:
244:
88:
986:
910:
I've also fixed formatting on this DRV and moved it to the correct day's log.
1145:
says that it's "not a topic", which is unequivocally an article argument.
1021:
The discussion was closed correctly, which is all we are discussing here.
204:
The article focuses entirely negative aspects of the person and gives them
585:
326:, not the least of which is analysis of how the newspapers reported it.
658:, though I never like Alexa stats. But the rest work for me!
181:
I have created a properly cited and neutral stub article at
243:
per Mgm. The public interest test, if you will, is failed.
414:
The only source that it has is a book of quotations. You
304:
is not addressed with this re-creation. M. McKinney has,
1089:
But a lot of them did address the issue as if it were an
845:
841:
833:
825:
544:
540:
532:
524:
164:
150:
142:
134:
262:The public interest test, if you will, is failed
260:Please tell us the rational for your statement "
485:– Moved to mainspace per unanimous agreement –
1102:List of people known as The Great#"The Greats"
985:per community consensus expressed at the TFD.
584:in 2007 because the article did not show why
8:
316:Encyclopedia of Contemporary British Culture
803:The following is an archived debate of the
502:The following is an archived debate of the
106:The following is an archived debate of the
1104:and would be there complaining right now.
762:
476:
76:
1093:that they were discussing, rather than a
329:Remember the words from a big green box
48:
878:based on 5 positive votes in 7 days. --
57:
40:
7:
821:Template:Rulers known as "the Great"
770:Template:Rulers known as "the Great"
1175:of the page listed in the heading.
751:of the page listed in the heading.
465:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
1171:The above is an archive of the
747:The above is an archive of the
461:The above is an archive of the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
264:"? While not at all a fan of
1:
1160:02:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
1137:20:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
1114:11:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
1085:01:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
1068:22:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
1052:21:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
1031:19:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
1014:11:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
995:02:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
974:11:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
960:15:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
941:00:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
920:00:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
906:00:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
888:00:17, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
794:00:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
738:01:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
721:22:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
702:22:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
684:21:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
668:19:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
649:18:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
628:02:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
614:11:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
598:04:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
493:06:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
446:08:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
432:02:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
410:14:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
393:14:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
376:13:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
343:12:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
292:13:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
278:11:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
253:09:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
234:07:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
216:05:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
196:15:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
97:09:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
37:
639:Rewritten in a good manner.
520:User:Cunard/Article/BookRags
483:User:Cunard/Article/BookRags
183:User:Timtrent/Joyce McKinney
306:as she is quoted as stating
1198:
32:Administrator instructions
773:– Deletion endorsed. – —
420:Mormon sex in chains case
310:It's better to cover the
1178:Please do not modify it.
810:Please do not modify it.
754:Please do not modify it.
509:Please do not modify it.
468:Please do not modify it.
113:Please do not modify it.
50:Deletion review archives
331:here at Deletion Review
807:of the article above.
506:of the article above.
110:of the article above.
87:– Request withdrawn –
677:. Looks fine to me.
1095:navigation template
1130:other stuff exists
300:The intent of the
266:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
1185:
1184:
1050:
784:
761:
760:
711:per Trusilver. –
580:This article was
475:
474:
67:
66:
1189:
1180:
1126:relevant article
1122:Endorse deletion
1044:
1019:Endorse deletion
1000:Endorse deletion
983:Endorse deletion
894:Endorse deletion
861:
850:
849:
812:
787:
782:
780:
774:
763:
756:
726:Allow recreation
709:Allow recreation
693:per Trusilver. –
691:Allow recreation
681:
675:Allow recreation
656:Allow recreation
637:Allow recreation
604:Allow recreation
564:
549:
548:
511:
477:
470:
177:
175:
167:
153:
145:
137:
115:
77:
72:22 February 2009
63:
43:
38:
34:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1176:
1173:deletion review
928:Oppose deletion
851:
823:
819:
808:
805:deletion review
785:
778:
776:
752:
749:deletion review
679:
550:
522:
518:
507:
504:deletion review
466:
463:deletion review
171:
169:
163:
162:
156:
149:
148:
141:
140:
133:
132:
111:
108:deletion review
75:
68:
61:
41:
30:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1195:
1193:
1183:
1182:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1143:Simon Burchell
1119:
1118:
1117:
1070:
1054:
1033:
1016:
1004:disambiguation
997:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
924:
923:
922:
870:
864:
815:
814:
799:
798:
797:
796:
759:
758:
743:
742:
741:
740:
723:
705:
704:
687:
686:
671:
670:
652:
651:
633:
632:
631:
630:
579:
573:
567:
514:
513:
498:
497:
496:
495:
473:
472:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
378:
346:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
238:
237:
236:
179:
178:
160:
154:
146:
138:
130:
124:Joyce McKinney
118:
117:
102:
101:
100:
99:
84:Joyce McKinney
74:
69:
65:
64:
56:
47:
36:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1194:
1181:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1168:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1077:Themfromspace
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1062:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:Fiddle Faddle
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1009:
1005:
1001:
998:
996:
992:
988:
984:
981:
975:
971:
967:
963:
962:
961:
957:
953:
949:
944:
943:
942:
938:
934:
930:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
908:
907:
903:
899:
895:
892:
891:
890:
889:
885:
881:
877:
871:
868:
867:
862:
859:
855:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
822:
817:
816:
813:
811:
806:
801:
800:
795:
792:
791:
783:
781:
772:
771:
767:
766:
765:
764:
757:
755:
750:
745:
744:
739:
735:
731:
730:Themfromspace
727:
724:
722:
718:
714:
710:
707:
706:
703:
700:
698:
696:
692:
689:
688:
685:
682:
676:
673:
672:
669:
665:
661:
660:Fiddle Faddle
657:
654:
653:
650:
646:
642:
638:
635:
634:
629:
625:
621:
617:
616:
615:
612:
609:
605:
602:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
577:
576:
571:
570:
565:
562:
558:
554:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
521:
516:
515:
512:
510:
505:
500:
499:
494:
491:
488:
484:
481:
480:
479:
478:
471:
469:
464:
459:
458:
447:
443:
439:
438:Fiddle Faddle
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
402:Fiddle Faddle
399:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
385:Fiddle Faddle
382:
379:
377:
373:
370:
367:
363:
359:
354:
350:
347:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
327:
325:
321:
317:
313:
307:
303:
299:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
270:Fiddle Faddle
267:
263:
259:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:Fiddle Faddle
222:
219:
218:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
188:Fiddle Faddle
184:
174:
166:
159:
152:
144:
136:
129:
125:
122:
121:
120:
119:
116:
114:
109:
104:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
81:
80:
79:
78:
73:
70:
60:
55:
54:2009 February
51:
46:
39:
35:
33:
23:
19:
1177:
1170:
1147:Black Falcon
1121:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1072:
1061:Juliancolton
1056:
1039:
1035:
1018:
1003:
999:
982:
947:
927:
926:
893:
872:
818:
809:
802:
789:
775:
768:
753:
746:
725:
708:
695:Juliancolton
690:
674:
655:
636:
603:
517:
508:
501:
482:
467:
460:
415:
397:
380:
368:
349:Keep Deleted
348:
328:
323:
319:
315:
311:
309:
261:
257:
241:Keep deleted
240:
220:
206:undue weight
202:Keep deleted
201:
180:
112:
105:
82:
71:
29:
362:Usrnme h8er
59:February 23
45:February 21
933:Saddhiyama
880:Saddhiyama
790:discussion
713:Warrington
1141:Really?
876:consensus
680:Trusilver
324:as a case
641:Coaster7
586:BookRags
381:Withdraw
372:contribs
358:WP:BLP1E
258:Question
20: |
1152:Uncle G
1134:GRBerry
1106:Uncle G
1091:article
1073:Endorse
1057:Endorse
1036:Endorse
966:Uncle G
948:Comment
854:restore
834:history
582:deleted
553:restore
533:history
424:Uncle G
416:already
398:Request
335:Uncle G
221:Comment
173:restore
143:history
952:Stifle
912:Stifle
898:Stifle
779:Aitias
620:Cunard
590:Cunard
284:Stifle
245:Stifle
89:Stifle
1047:Help!
987:Erik9
858:cache
842:watch
838:links
557:cache
541:watch
537:links
353:WP:RS
312:event
165:watch
158:links
62:: -->
16:<
1156:talk
1110:talk
1081:talk
1027:talk
991:talk
970:talk
956:talk
937:talk
916:talk
902:talk
884:talk
866:TFD2
846:logs
830:talk
826:edit
734:talk
717:talk
664:talk
645:talk
624:talk
594:talk
575:AFD2
569:AFD1
545:logs
529:talk
525:edit
442:talk
428:talk
406:talk
389:talk
366:talk
339:talk
320:case
288:talk
274:talk
249:talk
230:talk
192:talk
151:logs
135:edit
128:talk
93:talk
42:<
1041:Guy
1008:Mgm
608:Mgm
561:MfD
487:Mgm
210:Mgm
22:Log
1158:)
1112:)
1083:)
1029:)
993:)
972:)
958:)
950:.
939:)
918:)
904:)
886:)
856:|
844:|
840:|
836:|
832:|
828:|
786://
736:)
719:)
666:)
647:)
626:)
596:)
559:|
555:|
543:|
539:|
535:|
531:|
527:|
444:)
430:)
408:)
391:)
374:)
341:)
290:)
276:)
251:)
232:)
194:)
95:)
52::
1154:(
1108:(
1079:(
1049:)
1045:(
1025:(
1010:|
989:(
968:(
954:(
935:(
914:(
900:(
882:(
869:)
863:|
860:)
852:(
848:)
824:(
732:(
715:(
662:(
643:(
622:(
610:|
592:(
578:)
572:|
566:|
563:)
551:(
547:)
523:(
489:|
440:(
426:(
404:(
387:(
369:·
364:(
337:(
286:(
272:(
247:(
228:(
212:|
190:(
176:)
170:(
168:)
161:|
155:|
147:|
139:|
131:|
126:(
91:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.