450:
551:
reasonable close well within admin discretion. There was some disagreement, but nothing of value (like content) seems lost, and there seems a way forward for all needs (the use of more specific templates). I seem to recall, but can't point to, a trend against extremely generic templating due to it
500:
There is not an apparent consensus in that XfD. There are several prominent editors who in the discussion are spoke contrary to the nomination and close. There were not rebuttals to them, but repreated badgering by the nominator. I'd have like to see at least one person on addition to the
530:. We frequently get a major backlog at TfD due to the relatively small number of admins closing the discussions. Sometimes it seems very clear to me, but not to others. I am always happy to add an additional closing statement when it is requested. Thanks!
246:
256:. I'm not a regular at DRV, so I'm not sure if I should be endorsing the original decision, or relisting it because of new information even if I still dont think it meets notability guidelines cited in the original AfD.—
505:" is a judgement call that allows for signficant discretion by the closer. However, when employing significant discretion, I think explanation should be given, and especially so when challenged. --
430:
297:
Could the old article be userfied, with the intention to recreate when further sources (in addition to the single one cited above) are included? (Userfication was suggessted in the AfD.)
615:
deletion process does not require a detailed closing explanation, so no fault there. Nomination is not an issue with the process merely disagreement. Neither are DRV issues. --
241:
If there is new information, why isnt the article recreated instead of questioning the process of the original review? I might add that one additional reference that is
171:
48:
34:
632:. There really was a rough consensus that this template should not be available for use. Editors are rightly encouraged to use a more specific template.—
555:
Apologies to
Plastikspork. I and the nominator should have asked more personably on your talk page before making statements here. Thanks Cunard. --
43:
596:
I've struck through your bolded sentiment here, as nominator your request for restoration is already known, you don't need to state it twice. --
159:
92:
39:
616:
597:
739:- Closer interpreted the debate correctly as bringin out too vague to be useful consensus with insufficient retort from the keeps. --
418:
707:
645:
197:
21:
180:
439:
681:
587:
469:
461:
759:
368:
320:
109:
17:
75:
87:
657:, there was consensus to delete. we can always ask the admin to add a closing statement if that is an issue.
677:
620:
601:
583:
465:
457:
193:
534:
224:
205:
253:
129:
388:
744:
703:
641:
748:
731:
711:
685:
666:
649:
624:
605:
591:
564:
539:
514:
491:
473:
357:
309:
289:
265:
242:
228:
209:
125:
98:
70:
560:
510:
487:
82:
79:
662:
582:
Once again, used for maintenance and unencylcopedic content when no alternative is available. --
273:
The media coverage cited above is too superficial to convey notability or to be the basis of a
531:
261:
220:
201:
188:
The article about LaSecla was originally deleted on the grounds that the subject did not meet
274:
249:
189:
740:
695:
633:
502:
305:
556:
506:
483:
348:
280:
658:
725:
384:
341:
257:
216:
447:
Used for maintenance and unencylcopedic content when no alternative is available.
300:
723:
disagreeing with the outcome is not sufficient reason to overturn the close.
449:
676:
there was a consensus to delete, now it's no longer needed. --
526:
I have provided an additional closing statement as requested
552:
being considered not sufficiently helpful to other editors).
527:
425:
411:
403:
395:
192:. However, now that the subject is now playing in the
166:
152:
144:
136:
234:
temporarily restored for discussion at
Deletion Review
252:, nor is Italian Football League listed unter SNG of
245:game coverage (english translation of article:
8:
501:nominator challenge the "Keeps". However, "
367:The following is an archived debate of the
108:The following is an archived debate of the
334:
63:
482:due to inadequate closing explanation. --
190:gridiron football notability guidelines
7:
762:of the page listed in the heading.
323:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
448:
76:User:Andrewlp1991/Jordan LaSecla
758:The above is an archive of the
345:– "Delete" closure endorsed. –
319:The above is an archive of the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
215:Example of media coverage is
464:) 03:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
200:), subject is now notable.
785:
765:Please do not modify it.
749:06:39, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
732:23:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
712:19:45, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
694:Struck duplicate !vote.—
686:19:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
667:18:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
650:15:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
625:07:49, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
606:07:49, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
592:04:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
565:00:16, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
540:23:54, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
515:01:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
492:03:31, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
474:03:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
374:Please do not modify it.
358:06:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
326:Please do not modify it.
310:19:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
290:09:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
266:01:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
229:23:16, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
210:23:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
115:Please do not modify it.
99:10:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
40:Deletion review archives
480:Overturn (no consensus)
194:Italian Football League
277:-conforming article.
271:Disallow recreation.
371:of the page above.
248:) does not satisfy
112:of the page above.
678:Captaincollect1970
584:Captaincollect1970
466:Captaincollect1970
458:Captaincollect1970
772:
771:
710:
648:
356:
333:
332:
288:
776:
767:
702:
700:
640:
638:
452:
442:
437:
428:
414:
406:
398:
376:
355:
353:
346:
335:
328:
303:
287:
285:
278:
183:
178:
169:
155:
147:
139:
117:
95:
90:
85:
64:
53:
33:
784:
783:
779:
778:
777:
775:
774:
773:
763:
760:deletion review
696:
634:
537:
503:rough consensus
438:
436:
433:
424:
423:
417:
410:
409:
402:
401:
394:
393:
372:
369:deletion review
349:
347:
324:
321:deletion review
298:
281:
279:
179:
177:
174:
165:
164:
158:
151:
150:
143:
142:
135:
134:
113:
110:deletion review
93:
88:
83:
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
782:
780:
770:
769:
754:
753:
752:
751:
734:
717:
716:
715:
714:
689:
688:
669:
652:
627:
610:
609:
608:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
553:
543:
542:
535:
518:
517:
495:
494:
445:
444:
434:
421:
415:
407:
399:
391:
385:Template:NOT
379:
378:
363:
362:
361:
360:
342:Template:NOT
331:
330:
315:
314:
313:
312:
292:
268:
236:
231:
186:
185:
175:
162:
156:
148:
140:
132:
126:Jordan LaSecla
120:
119:
104:
103:
102:
101:
71:Jordan LaSecla
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
781:
768:
766:
761:
756:
755:
750:
746:
742:
738:
735:
733:
730:
729:
728:
722:
719:
718:
713:
709:
705:
701:
699:
693:
692:
691:
690:
687:
683:
679:
675:
674:
670:
668:
664:
660:
656:
653:
651:
647:
643:
639:
637:
631:
628:
626:
622:
618:
617:62.254.139.60
614:
611:
607:
603:
599:
598:62.254.139.60
595:
594:
593:
589:
585:
581:
580:
576:
575:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
547:
546:
545:
544:
541:
538:
533:
529:
525:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
512:
508:
504:
499:
498:
497:
496:
493:
489:
485:
481:
478:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
441:
432:
427:
420:
413:
405:
397:
390:
386:
383:
382:
381:
380:
377:
375:
370:
365:
364:
359:
354:
352:
344:
343:
339:
338:
337:
336:
329:
327:
322:
317:
316:
311:
307:
302:
296:
293:
291:
286:
284:
276:
272:
269:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
240:
237:
235:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
182:
173:
168:
161:
154:
146:
138:
131:
127:
124:
123:
122:
121:
118:
116:
111:
106:
105:
100:
96:
91:
86:
81:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
764:
757:
736:
726:
724:
720:
697:
672:
671:
654:
635:
629:
612:
578:
577:
548:
532:Plastikspork
523:
479:
453:
446:
373:
366:
350:
340:
325:
318:
294:
282:
270:
254:WP:NGRIDIRON
238:
233:
221:Andrewlp1991
202:Andrewlp1991
187:
114:
107:
74:– Userfy to
69:
58:
59:26 May 2012
49:2012 May 27
35:2012 May 25
741:Uzma Gamal
698:S Marshall
636:S Marshall
351:Sandstein
283:Sandstein
243:WP:ROUTINE
557:SmokeyJoe
507:SmokeyJoe
484:SmokeyJoe
659:Frietjes
454:Undelete
295:Question
44:2012 May
20: |
737:Endorse
727:Hut 8.5
721:Endorse
673:Restore
655:endorse
630:Endorse
613:Endorse
579:Restore
549:Endorse
524:Comment
440:restore
404:history
258:Bagumba
239:Comment
181:restore
145:history
80:King of
275:WP:BLP
250:WP:GNG
198:source
426:watch
419:links
301:Trevj
167:watch
160:links
52:: -->
16:<
745:talk
682:talk
663:talk
621:talk
602:talk
588:talk
561:talk
528:here
511:talk
488:talk
470:talk
462:talk
456:. --
412:logs
396:edit
389:talk
306:talk
262:talk
225:talk
217:here
206:talk
153:logs
137:edit
130:talk
32:<
431:XfD
429:) (
299:--
172:XfD
170:) (
22:Log
747:)
684:)
665:)
623:)
604:)
590:)
563:)
536:―Œ
513:)
490:)
472:)
308:)
264:)
227:)
219:.
208:)
97:♠
78:–
42::
743:(
708:C
706:/
704:T
680:(
661:(
646:C
644:/
642:T
619:(
600:(
586:(
559:(
509:(
486:(
468:(
460:(
443:)
435:|
422:|
416:|
408:|
400:|
392:|
387:(
304:(
260:(
223:(
204:(
196:(
184:)
176:|
163:|
157:|
149:|
141:|
133:|
128:(
94:♣
89:♦
84:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.