893:
but I think the best policy for any admin is to allow recreation upon a good faith request. It's not necessary for it to be one that would certainly pass afd -- afd is not all that predictable, and I'd rather debate those sources at afd than here. (my own view forthe moment is that they may well have shown at least borderline notability, and that is enough for here--there is promotional wording, but it isn't that extensive & can be easily fixed.
892:
When there are possibly significant additional sources, a new afd discussion is needed. It is not our role here to predict the result of it, unless the new information is so trivial that the matter is hopeless. That's not the case here. I think I am as concerned as anyone about promotional editing,
225:
Of the sources listed above, it would appear from the dates that numbers 1 and 4 are mirrors of number 2; number 3 appears to be unique. Unless it is to be stipulated that every person convicted of murder or attempted murder is thereby automatically notable, I am not convinced that notability of this
199:
Hi Taylor, and thanks for bringing our attention to this. I'm sure that when
Anthony Bradbury sees your note on his talk page he will come here, find those four links to reliable sources, and restore the page. I see that there are many, many more sources to choose from and I'm quite confident that
725:
meets
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines, only that the version currently in the encyclopedia would clearly fail if it went to AFD today AND there is no reason to allow re-creation until a draft that will easily survive AFD exists. See my recent analysis of the sources on
167:
as it wasn't sourced to anything reliable. I managed to find several reliable sources and posted a note on the talk page, but then the article was tagged with a speedy delete notice and was deleted before I had the chance to improve it. Here are the sources I first came across:
226:
person is averred in the article, including in the full version prior to its being slimmed down by another editor. I would like to see further views on this; if the consensus is that notability is adequately exhibited then I have no problem restoring the article. --
785:
Being a major player in an industry does not necessarily mean that the company meets
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability requirements, especially if the industry is one that at least a few people, myself included, didn't know existed, at least not under that name.
691:
Done, results on article talk page and userfied-article talk page. This review resulted in the "Keep deleted" entry of 21:22, 1 October 2013 below. As for other articles with equally weak sources, consider nominating them for deletion.
720:
but allow re-creation when the userfied page uses suitable sources to demonstrate the topic is notable to a degree that it would easily survive another trip to AFD. I did not do enough research to determine if the
754:
Hi
Davidwr, I appreciate the fact that you went and checked the sources. I'll add more sources to this version. I just want to point out that this company is a major player in the contract management industry:
669:
I just want you to be fair - there are many wiki pages where the citation comes from own websites and the pages are still published on wikipedia. Please double check the sources for Exari again, thank you.
859:
Good point, I put some cleanup tags on them and am considering nominating them for deletion, especially the one without non-independent references. Being "fair" isn't a reason to undo this action. See
278:
629:. These are the same sources that we had at the AFD: primary sources from partners and reposted press releases, nothing new here. Definitely does qualify for G4: AFD link here:
250:
301:. I put it to you that nobody advocating deletion has taken the trouble to google. An AfD is a complete waste of the community's time and should be snow closed if started.—
34:
290:
239:
The place for that discussion is AFD as DRV generally looks just at process. Unless you object, I shall close this and send this straight for AFD for that discussion.
294:
759:. I hope that it will be wikipedia notable. Again, thank you for your efforts - it's important to have people like you, who will check and double check everything.
48:
549:
As to how likely it would be to survive AFD, well, that's not a question for this discussion. Recommendation: Consider restoring and immediately sending to AFD.
258:
730:. Recommend that the author send any improved version through AFD or a similar peer-review process before attempting to move it back to the main encyclopedia.
43:
282:
510:
Thanks for the clarification - the reason for for overturning the deletion is the fact that my draft does include reliable sources that cover the company.
488:
Idea8623: the "REASON" is meant to be the reason why you wish this material restored, not the reason why it was deleted (which is publicly viewable already).
373:– I'm not seeing a clear consensus to overturn this and its lukewarm about whether a further AFD might be helpful/ As such this defaults to keep deleted. –
139:
535:
I believe I have the draft in two places, how should I proceed? I am not really familiar with the procedure for overturning a deletion. Please advise.
630:
599:
456:
274:
154:
189:
822:
254:
39:
495:
491:
298:
175:
756:
169:
314:
213:
270:
21:
842:
768:
526:
266:
171:
876:
798:
742:
704:
614:
589:
562:
861:
173:
915:
388:
348:
89:
17:
833:-- mostly links from their own websites or no links at all. As I said earlier, we need to keep wikipedia fair to all.
438:
177:
That's four sources and there's definitely more. (Note this is my first DRV, so apologies if I did something wrong.)
200:
Knowledge (XXG) should have an article about this woman. I don't expect this discussion to be open for seven days.—
333:
232:
163:
I believe the speedy deletion for this was a little too quick. The article had content, which was then stripped by
109:
262:
164:
490:
Everyone else: If the article he posted in mainspace has been speedied by now, he also has it in userspace at
547:
This does not qualify as a G2 deletion as it is not a test. It looks like it isn't eligible for A7 either.
499:
848:
774:
680:
659:
514:
286:
465:
823:
http://empoweringcpo.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/Predictions_2009_-_ePurchasing_Market.191230122.pdf
904:
882:
852:
815:
804:
778:
748:
710:
684:
663:
642:
620:
530:
503:
482:
377:
335:
328:
318:
243:
234:
227:
217:
193:
105:
78:
70:
310:
209:
180:
834:
760:
757:
http://www.vagueware.com/top-10-contract-management-software-that-will-make-work-faster-and-easier/
670:
649:
536:
518:
474:
838:
764:
674:
653:
540:
522:
478:
727:
408:
872:
794:
738:
700:
638:
610:
585:
558:
450:
404:
369:
324:
302:
201:
821:
After additional research I found this whitepaper from
Forrester that talks about Exari:
473:
Not a notable company - all the references seem to be primary sources or press releases
811:
I have put a temp undelete on the page and restored the history to assist discussion.
900:
825:; Also, I looked for other players in the industry and their presence on wikipedia -
865:
812:
787:
731:
693:
634:
603:
578:
551:
374:
240:
75:
648:
MrOllie, I believe that these sources could be considered as reliable sources.
74:– I have listed this at AFD. I also added the sources found by S.Marshall. –
826:
895:
830:
327:. I try not to make more than one determination on any given issue. --
598:
The deletion log didn't mention the AFD, but I did find it at
573:
Also does not qualify as G4 as there has not been a previous
445:
431:
423:
415:
146:
132:
124:
116:
285:. I could go on and on. In fact, I think I will.
827:https://en.wikipedia.org/Thunderhead_(software
8:
831:https://en.wikipedia.org/Business_Integrity
631:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Exari
600:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Exari
387:The following is an archived debate of the
88:The following is an archived debate of the
362:
323:I have no objection to having it taken to
63:
7:
918:of the page listed in the heading.
492:User:Idea8623/sandbox/Exari Systems
351:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
914:The above is an archive of the
347:The above is an archive of the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
568:20:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
905:01:12, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
883:17:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
853:15:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
816:15:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
805:23:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
779:21:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
749:21:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
711:21:37, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
685:20:56, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
664:20:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
643:20:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
621:20:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
595:20:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
531:19:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
504:19:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
483:18:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
378:15:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
336:19:02, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
319:18:31, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
244:14:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
235:10:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
218:21:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
194:20:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
79:20:24, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
941:
921:Please do not modify it.
394:Please do not modify it.
354:Please do not modify it.
95:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
106:Melissa Ann Friedrich
71:Melissa Ann Friedrich
862:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
575:deletion discussion
391:of the page above.
165:NorthBySouthBaranof
92:of the page above.
675:User talk:Idea8623
654:User talk:Idea8623
541:User talk:Idea8623
928:
927:
890:Allow recreation.
881:
880:
803:
802:
747:
746:
709:
708:
623:
619:
618:
594:
593:
567:
566:
534:
517:comment added by
361:
360:
317:
216:
35:2013 September 30
932:
923:
870:
869:
855:
792:
791:
781:
736:
735:
698:
697:
687:
666:
608:
607:
597:
583:
582:
556:
555:
533:
511:
468:
463:
448:
434:
426:
418:
396:
363:
356:
330:Anthony Bradbury
309:
307:
229:Anthony Bradbury
208:
206:
183:
159:
157:
149:
135:
127:
119:
97:
64:
53:
33:
940:
939:
935:
934:
933:
931:
930:
929:
919:
916:deletion review
846:
772:
678:
657:
512:
464:
462:
459:
455:
444:
443:
437:
430:
429:
422:
421:
414:
413:
392:
389:deletion review
352:
349:deletion review
303:
202:
192:
182:Taylor Trescott
181:
153:
151:
145:
144:
138:
131:
130:
123:
122:
115:
114:
93:
90:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
938:
936:
926:
925:
910:
909:
908:
907:
886:
885:
851:comment added
819:
818:
808:
807:
777:comment added
752:
751:
714:
713:
683:comment added
662:comment added
646:
645:
624:
508:
507:
471:
470:
460:
453:
441:
435:
427:
419:
411:
399:
398:
383:
382:
381:
380:
359:
358:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
248:
247:
246:
220:
188:
161:
160:
142:
136:
128:
120:
112:
100:
99:
84:
83:
82:
81:
61:
59:1 October 2013
56:
49:2013 October 2
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
937:
924:
922:
917:
912:
911:
906:
902:
898:
897:
891:
888:
887:
884:
878:
874:
867:
863:
858:
857:
856:
854:
850:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
824:
817:
814:
810:
809:
806:
800:
796:
789:
784:
783:
782:
780:
776:
770:
766:
762:
758:
750:
744:
740:
733:
729:
724:
719:
716:
715:
712:
706:
702:
695:
690:
689:
688:
686:
682:
676:
672:
667:
665:
661:
655:
651:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
622:
616:
612:
605:
601:
596:
591:
587:
580:
576:
572:
564:
560:
553:
550:
546:
545:
544:
542:
538:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
506:
505:
501:
497:
496:74.74.150.139
493:
487:
486:
485:
484:
480:
476:
467:
458:
452:
447:
440:
433:
425:
417:
410:
406:
403:
402:
401:
400:
397:
395:
390:
385:
384:
379:
376:
372:
371:
367:
366:
365:
364:
357:
355:
350:
345:
344:
337:
334:
332:
331:
326:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
306:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
245:
242:
238:
237:
236:
233:
231:
230:
224:
221:
219:
215:
211:
207:
205:
198:
197:
196:
195:
191:
186:
185:
184:
176:
174:
172:
170:
166:
156:
148:
141:
134:
126:
118:
111:
107:
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
96:
91:
86:
85:
80:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
920:
913:
894:
889:
820:
753:
722:
718:Keep deleted
717:
668:
647:
627:Keep deleted
626:
574:
570:
569:
548:
513:— Preceding
509:
489:
472:
393:
386:
368:
353:
346:
329:
304:
228:
222:
203:
179:
178:
162:
94:
87:
69:
58:
44:2013 October
847:—Preceding
773:—Preceding
679:—Preceding
658:—Preceding
728:Talk:Exari
305:S Marshall
204:S Marshall
877:contribs
843:contribs
835:Idea8623
799:contribs
769:contribs
761:Idea8623
743:contribs
705:contribs
671:contribs
650:contribs
615:contribs
590:contribs
563:contribs
537:contribs
527:contribs
519:Idea8623
515:unsigned
475:Idea8623
190:my edits
20: |
866:davidwr
849:undated
813:Spartaz
788:davidwr
775:undated
732:davidwr
723:company
694:davidwr
681:undated
660:undated
635:MrOllie
604:davidwr
579:davidwr
552:davidwr
466:restore
451:article
424:history
375:Spartaz
241:Spartaz
223:Comment
155:restore
125:history
76:Spartaz
571:Update
299:source
295:source
291:source
287:Source
283:source
279:source
275:source
271:source
267:source
263:source
259:source
255:source
251:Source
901:talk
446:watch
439:links
405:Exari
370:Exari
187:- +
147:watch
140:links
52:: -->
16:<
873:talk
839:talk
795:talk
765:talk
739:talk
701:talk
639:talk
611:talk
586:talk
559:talk
523:talk
500:talk
479:talk
432:logs
416:edit
409:talk
133:logs
117:edit
110:talk
32:<
896:DGG
875:)/(
845:)
797:)/(
771:)
741:)/(
703:)/(
677:)
656:)
613:)/(
588:)/(
577:.
561:)/(
457:XfD
449:) (
325:AfD
22:Log
903:)
864:.
841:•
829:;
767:•
641:)
633:-
602:.
543:)
529:)
525:•
502:)
494:.
481:)
297:,
293:,
289:,
281:,
277:,
273:,
269:,
265:,
261:,
257:,
253:,
42::
899:(
879:)
871:(
868:/
837:(
801:)
793:(
790:/
763:(
745:)
737:(
734:/
707:)
699:(
696:/
673:(
652:(
637:(
617:)
609:(
606:/
592:)
584:(
581:/
565:)
557:(
554:/
539:(
521:(
498:(
477:(
469:)
461:|
454:|
442:|
436:|
428:|
420:|
412:|
407:(
315:C
313:/
311:T
214:C
212:/
210:T
158:)
152:(
150:)
143:|
137:|
129:|
121:|
113:|
108:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.