216:
releases. I certainly did take account of the prior history, which showed similar efforts to write a similarly promotional article on a borderline notable author who managed to get one book in the bottom position of the NYT best-seller list. It wasn't strictly speaking a re-creation of deleted content, (see but it came close. As I told the editor, an article might be possible, but since it would take rewriting from scratch, AfC is the place for it. In fairness,
1058:. Based on the guidelines, I am unable to site his facebook, twitter and other pages which are user edited, as pointed by the admin. The page is searched and this is the reason I have created the article on this actor. He has been in the Malayalam Film Industry for almost 10+ years and has acted in 50+ movies and is not a non-notable personality. A reviewer may review the article and make necessary changes to the page after the page is published. See
252:, it does not require "rewriting from scratch" and it was already reviewed by another user. You already know why the current title is "extraordinarily promotional", it is because the actual title is protected and the current one is meant to be temporal, which is why I was asking you to remove protection from
1100:
I want to provide the the reference links given above in the article and would want to work on this thereby improving the article. Please suggest on how to get a copy of the article to work on. I would also like the page to be reviewed so that the page doesn't get deleted again. Requesting the admin
712:
The fervency of recreation and argument here suggests a unique interest in this particular individual, who seems at best borderline notable. That itself calls into question motivation, but I don't think we need to pursue that aspect, because G11 doesn't take motivation into consideration, just the
215:
The article itself was very highly promotional, using an extraordinarily promotional title. repeating the name at every opportunity (one single sentence there used his name four times!), avoid claiming importance based on non-notable awards, and avoid using sources that are essentially press
457:
to use AFC (and I never have) but if it means avoiding blatantly promotional content like this then it should be considered. I think the deletion was entirely appropriate. Want the "proper" title unsalted? Develop a good draft in your userspace and bring it back to DRV for discussion.
305:
that there might be enough notability for an article to be written, as suggested above, but this isn't it. I would grab the text while the history is available and work on it in a sandbox if I wanted to rescue it (which I don't)
279:
The present material is highly unsuitable as an encyclopedia article though I suppose an acceptable version might be possible. Maybe the article could be reduced to a stub – the
Bloomberg reference is good though brief. I think
514:
His book was 1 on WSJ, 6 on
Publishers Weekly, 10 on NYTimes and was also on the US Today list, but you called him "a borderline notable author who managed to get one book in the bottom position of the NYT best-seller list"? —
1036:
Article do not fail. Request the admin to reconsider and restore the article as the information given in the article is correct and is given from reliable sources (links are given below) that the actor is notable personality.
503:
Is there a policy or guideline against using multiple occupation, 'Known for' or indicating the organisation in the inbox or lead sentence of the biography of a living person with multiple occupation and notable for
1044:
602:
be like. As such, the deletion is likely to be endorsed as technically valid. But as I suggested above, the best thing to do would be to work on a great draft, come back here for approval to unprotect the
1118:. Article quality was very poor on many levels and I am unconvinced that userfying will do anything to improve the article. Evidence towards notability is minimal and unconvincing. This still fails
424:, a article that doesn't even mention the concept of a "prosperity coach". What this article needs--and the subject deserves-- is not tinkering, but radical rewriting from scratch True, nobody is
220:
as I normally do for articles that come here. (fwiw, I should probably just have nominated it for speedy and let some other admin delete, but I'm losing patience with promotionalism )
598:-compliant, neutrally worded and well-sourced article, just that it hadn't been created when the admin made his decision. G11 doesn't really take into account what an alternate article
144:
511:
included in the coaching article, if prosperity coaching is not included, is it not one of them or must it be included before linking to the general article on the subject?
1049:
and also wiki pages has mentioned his part in the movies he has acted. The interview in a famous channel is also a good reference for more information on this actor.
489:
159:
48:
34:
942:– Endorsed. If the nominator can find some genuinely reliable sourcing I'd be willing to userfy this for them. Drop me a note on my talk page to discuss, –
1059:
1019:
845:
538:, particularly in the US, which he shares with other notable public speakers, and the other recognitions he earned, you called them "non-notable awards"?
43:
256:, so I can move it there. AfC is not compulsory and it is actually meant for new or not advanced users; I review AfC sometimes. Thank you. —
492:
498:
486:
1007:
833:
39:
361:
1041:
669:
420:
Everything linked, every time; Prosperity coach is linked as if we had an article on it, but the link is just a piped link to
525:
478:
Apart from the past history of this article, DGG has not pointed out what is so critically wrong with the current contents:
531:
21:
1028:
854:
114:
1088:
885:
612:
516:
665:
110:
70:
522:
1142:
1083:
The
Deletion discussion seems valid, but if an editor wants to work on the article they should be able to do so.
957:
917:
783:
743:
94:
17:
1047:
519:
695:
any deletion by DGG as I am familiar with his high standards. This is no exception — it's an advertisement.
495:
1131:
1127:
1110:
1092:
1084:
1074:
946:
906:
902:
889:
881:
871:
772:
722:
704:
685:
673:
650:
628:
585:
471:
439:
428:
to use AfC, but it can avoid the embarrassment of repeated trying to put articles like this in mainspace.
365:
342:
320:
293:
265:
231:
207:
185:
83:
79:
621:
464:
803:
557:
And apart from perception, can someone else tell me how this cautiously toned and properly referenced
348:
Blatant misuse of
Knowledge for promotional purposes; kill it with fire. Good decision by DGG there.—
357:
1102:
1066:
1106:
1070:
867:
315:
1063:
799:
764:
718:
637:. The problems with Randy Gage are almost identical to those that have been discussed concerning
581:
549:
338:
261:
203:
181:
608:
253:
1123:
898:
289:
75:
977:
700:
616:
566:
459:
880:
so interested editor(s) can work on the article for possible reintroduction in the future.
535:
349:
863:
682:
646:
634:
308:
1119:
731:
Consider another attempt at addressing promotional tone concerns at the new revision—
714:
595:
577:
570:
558:
545:
435:
334:
281:
257:
249:
227:
199:
177:
173:
169:
1038:
943:
897:. No evidence provided for how the article could be improved through userfication.
769:
485:
Is Randy Gage not an
American author, prosperity coach and motivational speaker? —
285:
973:
938:
696:
329:
Consider an attempt at addressing promotional tone concerns at the new revision—
1056:
1053:
1050:
642:
638:
415:
Randy Gage is an
American author, prosperity coach and motivational speaker.
594:
I don't think anyone is suggesting that you aren't capable of creating a
508:
430:
421:
222:
541:
Can you point out the references which "are essentially press releases"?
862:
documentary film maker, philanthropist, heir to a billionaire fortune
713:
state of the article, which looks solely promotional to me, too.
633:
To answer all the questions, simply re-review the discussions on
641:, with the added problem here that we're dealing with a BLP.--
284:
was met but that does not preclude a fresh start being made.
681:, absolutely textbook case of G11, and a good call by DGG.
301:
The article is a self-serving uncritical hagiography. It is
1014:
1000:
992:
984:
840:
826:
818:
810:
732:
562:
330:
245:
195:
151:
137:
129:
121:
172:, deletion is actually based on past history—see
615:or something so you can work on it for a bit.
8:
1060:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Joju George
956:The following is an archived debate of the
782:The following is an archived debate of the
507:There are various applications or kinds of
93:The following is an archived debate of the
931:
757:
63:
534:, one of the most cherished honours in
393:Organization Prosperity Factory, Inc.
7:
1145:of the page listed in the heading.
920:of the page listed in the heading.
746:of the page listed in the heading.
611:, and off you go. Start a draft at
28:
664:. Reads like an autohagiography.
1101:to restore the page in the wiki.
1141:The above is an archive of the
916:The above is an archive of the
742:The above is an archive of the
613:User:Johnmoor/Randy Gage draft
1:
246:last revision before deletion
111:Randy Gage (prosperity coach)
71:Randy Gage (prosperity coach)
1132:20:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
1111:08:57, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
1093:11:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
1075:16:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
947:07:35, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
907:20:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
890:11:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
872:07:01, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
773:07:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
723:07:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
705:14:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
686:12:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
674:13:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
651:18:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
629:09:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
586:11:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
472:22:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
440:22:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
366:21:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
343:16:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
321:13:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
294:10:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
266:01:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
232:00:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
208:18:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
186:00:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
84:19:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
1168:
532:CPAE Speaker Hall of Fame
376:I note from the infobox:
218:I'm restoring the history
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
1148:Please do not modify it.
963:Please do not modify it.
923:Please do not modify it.
789:Please do not modify it.
749:Please do not modify it.
412:with the lede sentence:
174:User talk:DGG#Randy Gage
100:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
569:, and therefore, fails
74:– Deletion endorsed. –
544:Is this article not a
666:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
405:Motivational Speaking
194:A new revision exist
388:Motivational Speaker
168:Article do not fail
960:of the page above.
786:of the page above.
402:Prosperity Coaching
97:of the page above.
1064:User talk:Mr.Z-man
578:JOHNMOORofMOORLAND
335:JOHNMOORofMOORLAND
258:JOHNMOORofMOORLAND
200:JOHNMOORofMOORLAND
178:JOHNMOORofMOORLAND
1155:
1154:
1085:Candleabracadabra
930:
929:
882:Candleabracadabra
756:
755:
364:
1159:
1150:
1116:Endorse deletion
1031:
1026:
1017:
1003:
995:
987:
965:
932:
925:
895:Endorse deletion
857:
852:
843:
829:
821:
813:
791:
758:
751:
625:
552:not be followed?
468:
385:Prosperity Coach
356:
354:
318:
311:
164:
162:
154:
140:
132:
124:
102:
64:
53:
33:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1146:
1143:deletion review
1027:
1025:
1022:
1013:
1012:
1006:
999:
998:
991:
990:
983:
982:
961:
958:deletion review
921:
918:deletion review
853:
851:
848:
839:
838:
832:
825:
824:
817:
816:
809:
808:
787:
784:deletion review
747:
744:deletion review
623:
536:public speaking
466:
350:
316:
309:
198:. Thank you.) —
158:
156:
150:
149:
143:
136:
135:
128:
127:
120:
119:
98:
95:deletion review
62:
59:16 October 2013
55:
54:
51:
49:2013 October 17
46:
37:
35:2013 October 15
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1165:
1163:
1153:
1152:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1113:
1095:
1034:
1033:
1023:
1010:
1004:
996:
988:
980:
968:
967:
952:
951:
950:
949:
928:
927:
912:
911:
910:
909:
892:
860:
859:
849:
836:
830:
822:
814:
806:
794:
793:
778:
777:
776:
775:
754:
753:
738:
737:
726:
725:
707:
689:
676:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
635:Talk:Grammarly
589:
588:
574:
555:
554:
553:
542:
539:
528:
512:
505:
501:
480:
479:
475:
474:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
418:
417:
416:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
403:
400:
394:
391:
390:
389:
386:
383:
369:
368:
324:
323:
296:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
237:
236:
235:
234:
166:
165:
147:
141:
133:
125:
117:
105:
104:
89:
88:
87:
86:
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1164:
1151:
1149:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1039:
1030:
1021:
1016:
1009:
1002:
994:
986:
979:
975:
972:
971:
970:
969:
966:
964:
959:
954:
953:
948:
945:
941:
940:
936:
935:
934:
933:
926:
924:
919:
914:
913:
908:
904:
900:
896:
893:
891:
887:
883:
879:
876:
875:
874:
873:
869:
865:
856:
847:
842:
835:
828:
820:
812:
805:
801:
798:
797:
796:
795:
792:
790:
785:
780:
779:
774:
771:
768:– Endorsed –
767:
766:
762:
761:
760:
759:
752:
750:
745:
740:
739:
736:
735:Thank you. —
734:
730:
724:
720:
716:
711:
708:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
687:
684:
680:
677:
675:
671:
667:
663:
660:
659:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
631:
630:
627:
626:
620:
619:
614:
610:
606:
601:
597:
593:
592:
591:
590:
587:
583:
579:
575:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
551:
548:, and should
547:
543:
540:
537:
533:
529:
527:
524:
521:
518:
513:
510:
506:
502:
500:
497:
494:
491:
488:
484:
483:
482:
481:
477:
476:
473:
470:
469:
463:
462:
456:
452:
449:
448:
441:
437:
433:
432:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
411:
404:
401:
398:
397:
395:
392:
387:
384:
381:
380:
378:
377:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
367:
363:
359:
355:
353:
347:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
322:
319:
314:
312:
304:
300:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
278:
275:
274:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
233:
229:
225:
224:
219:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
188:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
161:
153:
146:
139:
131:
123:
116:
112:
109:
108:
107:
106:
103:
101:
96:
91:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
1147:
1140:
1124:IronGargoyle
1115:
1097:
1080:
1035:
962:
955:
937:
922:
915:
899:IronGargoyle
894:
877:
861:
788:
781:
763:
748:
741:
728:
727:
709:
692:
678:
661:
622:
617:
604:
599:
576:Thank you. —
465:
460:
454:
453:- nobody is
450:
429:
425:
351:
333:Thank you. —
326:
325:
307:
302:
298:
276:
248:do not fail
221:
217:
191:
189:
167:
99:
92:
76:IronGargoyle
69:
58:
44:2013 October
974:Joju George
939:Joju George
800:Sam Branson
765:Sam Branson
567:advertising
550:WP:BLPSTYLE
379:Occupation
317:talk to me?
609:Randy Gage
571:WP:CSD#G11
396:Known for
352:S Marshall
282:WP:CSD#G11
254:Randy Gage
250:WP:CSD#G11
170:WP:CSD#G11
1103:Prardhana
1067:Prardhana
864:Zigzig20s
683:Lankiveil
639:Grammarly
310:Jimfbleak
715:Jclemens
691:I would
618:Stalwart
561:article—
509:coaching
461:Stalwart
455:required
426:required
422:coaching
303:possible
20: |
1098:Editing
1029:restore
993:history
944:Spartaz
855:restore
819:history
770:Spartaz
710:Endorse
693:endorse
679:Endorse
662:Endorse
607:title,
451:Endorse
399:Writing
299:Endorse
286:Thincat
277:Endorse
160:restore
130:history
1120:WP:GNG
1081:Userfy
1055:, and
878:Userfy
697:Stifle
605:proper
596:WP:MOS
559:WP:BLP
546:WP:BLP
382:Writer
1015:watch
1008:links
841:watch
834:links
733:HERE!
729:WAIT!
600:could
504:them?
436:talk
331:HERE!
327:HOLD!
228:talk
196:HERE!
192:NOTE!
152:watch
145:links
52:: -->
16:<
1128:talk
1107:talk
1089:talk
1071:talk
1062:and
1001:logs
985:edit
978:talk
903:talk
886:talk
868:talk
827:logs
811:edit
804:talk
719:talk
701:talk
670:talk
647:talk
643:Ronz
582:talk
563:HERE
530:The
339:talk
290:talk
262:talk
244:The
204:talk
182:talk
138:logs
122:edit
115:talk
80:talk
32:<
1122:.
1020:XfD
1018:) (
846:XfD
844:) (
624:111
565:is
467:111
431:DGG
223:DGG
22:Log
1130:)
1109:)
1091:)
1073:)
1052:,
1046:,
1043:,
1040:,
905:)
888:)
870:)
721:)
703:)
672:)
649:)
584:)
438:)
341:)
313:-
292:)
264:)
230:)
206:)
184:)
176:.
82:)
42::
1126:(
1105:(
1087:(
1069:(
1032:)
1024:|
1011:|
1005:|
997:|
989:|
981:|
976:(
901:(
884:(
866:(
858:)
850:|
837:|
831:|
823:|
815:|
807:|
802:(
717:(
699:(
688:.
668:(
645:(
580:(
573:?
526:4
523:3
520:2
517:1
499:5
496:4
493:3
490:2
487:1
434:(
362:C
360:/
358:T
337:(
288:(
260:(
226:(
202:(
190:(
180:(
163:)
157:(
155:)
148:|
142:|
134:|
126:|
118:|
113:(
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.