78:. While it seems like the original arguments for restoration didn't convince anyone, there appears to be room for discussion on the sources provided later in the discussion, even if the feeling is that they are rather weak. Normally we settle discussions about whether contested sources/notability claims are actually sufficient for an article at AFD, so after restoration this will get a new deletion discussion.
352:
is where I'm at. Clearly the new sources since the AfD are enough to overcome a speedy. I think only the AVN article is from before the AfD. That said, I fully expect this to go back to AfD. Sources aren't great and lots of people out looking for porn articles to delete. And that's fine, AfD is
325:] is a publication I don't know. "New media". And editorial oversight is really unclear. Plus it is just an interview, which many don't count for much toward WP:N. So while it is solely about her, most folks will probably not give it much heft toward WP:N.
331:
is partly, but not solely, an interview. Some folks don't like the porn press as it often seems like a PR voice for the industry. But otherwise a pretty good article for WP:N. I think it could form the basis for much of a good article on the
271:
182:
313:
one isn't useless, but it has very limited coverage. All it does is provide a reliable source for the fact that she is, in fact, quite popular. That's something, but not much.
48:
186:
164:
43:
34:
196:
Those kinds of metrics carry exactly zero weight here. For this to have any chance of succeeding, you're going to have to show the existence of
39:
223:
152:
275:
87:
21:
319:
is literally one paragraph. But it is traditional mainstream media. And it does list her among the most popular porn stars.
181:
Significant rise in popularity since 2 years ago - ranked #1 yearly & monthly on pornhub's list. 5M instagram followers.
310:
253:
173:
328:
262:
373:
102:
17:
209:
Agree with
Cryptic - if there are no new secondary sources to review, there's no way this is going to be overturned.
342:, but this looks pretty good. Not solely about her by any means, but she's a significant part of the article.
215:
83:
362:
299:
279:
246:
228:
204:
190:
91:
289:. Several of them barely mention her. I'm not sure how reliable porn industry publications are either.
335:
265:
210:
79:
322:
316:
259:
256:
122:
286:
197:
358:
242:
339:
254:
https://www.xbiz.com/news/246121/op-ed-heres-what-happened-with-the-mia-khalifa-interview
234:
263:
https://avn.com/business/articles/video/lana-rhoades-discusses-porn-debut-669399.html
292:
201:
118:
70:
354:
238:
266:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-sexual-coercion-epidemic-in-porn
260:
https://www.bosshunting.com.au/culture/lana-rhoades-exclusive
257:
https://fortune.com/2018/01/24/most-popular-adult-film-stars/
198:
significant coverage of this person in reliable sources
159:
145:
137:
129:
287:
significant coverage in third-party reliable sources
233:per above, you need sources. If this can't meet
270:Redirect to penthouse pet is pretty confusing
8:
101:The following is an archived debate of the
63:
353:where, IMO, this discussion belongs.
285:The sources would need to constitute
272:2600:8801:C100:2E4:9A5:E887:195E:2ADF
183:2600:8801:C100:2E4:D4AC:B12E:E49:B355
7:
376:of the page listed in the heading.
338:is often not highly regarded as a
28:
372:The above is an archive of the
306:Quick overview of the sources.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
92:07:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
363:13:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
300:06:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
280:04:31, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
247:21:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
229:23:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
205:21:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
191:20:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
399:
379:Please do not modify it.
237:, it isn't coming back.
108:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
76:Restore and list at AFD
105:of the page above.
386:
385:
390:
381:
295:
226:
218:
176:
171:
162:
148:
140:
132:
110:
64:
59:1 September 2019
53:
49:2019 September 2
33:
398:
397:
393:
392:
391:
389:
388:
387:
377:
374:deletion review
340:reliable source
293:
222:
214:
172:
170:
167:
158:
157:
151:
144:
143:
136:
135:
128:
127:
106:
103:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
396:
394:
384:
383:
368:
367:
366:
365:
346:
345:
344:
343:
333:
326:
320:
314:
303:
302:
250:
249:
231:
207:
179:
178:
168:
155:
149:
141:
133:
125:
113:
112:
97:
96:
95:
94:
61:
56:
47:
44:2019 September
38:
35:2019 August 31
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
395:
382:
380:
375:
370:
369:
364:
360:
356:
351:
348:
347:
341:
337:
334:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
308:
307:
305:
304:
301:
298:
297:
296:
288:
284:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
268:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
230:
227:
225:
219:
217:
212:
211:SportingFlyer
208:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:
193:
192:
188:
184:
175:
166:
161:
154:
147:
139:
131:
124:
120:
117:
116:
115:
114:
111:
109:
104:
99:
98:
93:
89:
88:contributions
85:
81:
80:Jo-Jo Eumerus
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
378:
371:
349:
323:Boss Hunting
291:
290:
269:
251:
221:
213:
180:
119:Lana Rhoades
107:
100:
75:
71:Lana Rhoades
69:
58:
336:Daily Beast
252:sources:
332:subject.
20: |
350:Restore
317:Fortune
294:Hut 8.5
202:Cryptic
174:restore
138:history
355:Hobit
239:Hobit
160:watch
153:links
52:: -->
16:<
359:talk
311:xbiz
309:The
276:talk
243:talk
235:WP:N
187:talk
146:logs
130:edit
123:talk
84:talk
32:<
329:Anv
200:. —
165:XfD
163:) (
22:Log
361:)
278:)
245:)
189:)
90:)
86:,
74:–
42::
357:(
274:(
241:(
224:C
220:·
216:T
185:(
177:)
169:|
156:|
150:|
142:|
134:|
126:|
121:(
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.