645:
completely agree to, i have stated above in detail why it was not qualifying for G4. I see then David (deleting admin) steps in, first removes the funding section and references from the page, and eventually deletes the whole article. How could someone delete an article under G4 when the CSD was already declined by another admin. G4 says "this applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion." 80% of the articles i had cited as source were published after the AfD which took place five years ago (September 2016). The nomination/deletion was so erroneous it beggars belief.
569:
and the subject has since reveived a lot of coverage in reliable sources, an admin would be able to see it. They also don't appear to have checked online for new sources and to see if it now passes ncorp. I had cited around 30 reliable sources if memory serves me correctly and each covers the subject directly and in detail. Secondly, this article was put through afc and was approved because they found it to be notable. It was accepted by a seasoned editor. If the topic were not notable, they would have declined it there itself.
672:
deleted the page, but he may have been working off an old list of tagged articles, even though Lee
Vilenski, who is indeed an admin, had declined the speedy tag with a reasonable rationale. As the article existed before it was deleted, I'm not sure I see a good reason for it to continue to exist in
568:
Thanks for keeping your perspective. I beg to differ with you on sending it to AFD and I would explain why. First, the person who marked it for speed deletion mustn't have checked when the previous article was afded and deleted or they wouldn't have G4 it only. The AFDed article was deleted in 2016
462:
though it was not similar to the previously deleted article. It had many new sources added, with significant coverage. I placed two undeletion requests at the deletion admin's talk page with no response. Maybe, they are busy, and therefore, i request a deletion review here. The person who nominated
644:
Thanks for undeleting
Pepperfry. I checked the page history and noticed that the page was G4'ed on the 5th January 2021 and the speedy deletion was declined on the very day by an administrator who stated It has been four years since the AfD, and it does make a better attempt at meeting GNG which i
597:
An editor who has been around
Knowledge (XXG) since 2014, who frequently participates in Article for Deletion discussions, and is an Autopatroller and GA contributors confused CSD with AFD? No way. If you see the editor has provided the link also to previous deletion discussion while G4'ing, so it
667:
Tungut bey, DavidNotMD (the user who edited the article prior to deletion) and David Gerard (who deleted and salted it) are not the same user. If they were, I would agree that that would be improper. As is, it's not clear to me why
502:, The article was submitted as a draft only, it was then accepted and moved to mainspace. The page was deleted through afd in 2016 and the last version was not similar to that. It had many 2019 & 20's sources added.
190:- The article was not deleted for notability, but as advertising. The article can be re-created in draft, and an extended-confirmed reviewer will be able to accept it. No need to restore any previous versions.
176:
481:- The draft title has not been salted. If the reviewer agrees that the draft should be accepted, the article title can be unsalted. Is the appellant asking for something else?
622:. The sources are non-independent and promotional, and the end result is a completely unsolvable promotional directory of information with no third party coverage. At best,
554:. Credible case that G4 did not apply, so send to AfD. Also, the AfD was years ago, and the SALTing was not done by consensus at AfD, so not generous leeway on the G4. —
211:(do we not have a shortcut for that anchor?) indicates that G11 is NOT one of the valid reasons to speedily delete content that has previously survived an XfD discussion.
48:
34:
947:
If you had asked the deleting admin about it, it could have been solved immediately. Now, has you have initiated a formal DRV, you have to wait for this to close. --
463:
the page doesn't seem to have checked it properly or it doesn't qualify for G4 in any way. The last version was completely different from the one deleted in 2016.
172:
43:
441:
802:
179:). I can't say about the last page version, but at some point in history the page has had a decent look, and eventually it can be restored at that state.
890:
Concur with Hobit that this doesn't need to be at DRV, that any admin can undelete this in good faith anticipation that sources will be added as stated.
876:
this doesn't need to be at DRV. Any admin can just undelete if you promise to add those sources. To be clear, this doesn't prevent a future AfD etc.
429:
291:
I'm not sure two "no consensuses" means it "survived" (I might read "survived" as "kept") but there's enough doubt to merit further conversation.
821:
171:
Disputed Speedy deletion. This article cannot be deleted as speedy, since it's subject it's notable and the article already survived 2 AFDs (
450:
39:
305:
147:
21:
846:
673:
Knowledge (XXG)--we do not exist to either be a directory of companies nor to be a promotional venue for emerging companies.
874:
983:
162:
998:
752:
695:
379:
321:
97:
17:
975:
772:
486:
258:
195:
619:
399:
974:. The request was clearly just made at the wrong venue; someone should refund the article and close the DRV.
979:
297:
987:
956:
938:
920:
899:
885:
867:
741:
682:
662:
639:
607:
592:
578:
563:
544:
530:
511:
490:
472:
368:
310:
279:
262:
237:
220:
199:
86:
934:
863:
814:
768:
716:
658:
654:
603:
599:
574:
570:
507:
503:
497:
482:
468:
464:
254:
191:
952:
916:
650:
635:
588:
559:
395:
342:
233:
908:
895:
678:
526:
292:
216:
583:
I presume that the editors who tagged and deleted the article will want to nominated it a AfD. —
250:
208:
669:
721:
720:– Undeleted as contested PROD; let's not send the requester around the houses at random, see
627:
930:
859:
737:
732:
please add the sources to the article promptly to avoid the risk of it being deleted again.
727:
275:
117:
971:
623:
270:. Article was ineligible for speedy deletion under this criterion as it has passed an AFD.
881:
539:
363:
354:
459:
834:
350:- improperly G4'd. This doesn't preclude another AfD, if anyone thinks it appropriate.
948:
912:
631:
584:
555:
246:
229:
77:
891:
674:
646:
522:
212:
618:
If undeleted, list immediately at AfD. The deleted article was a woeful fail of
733:
271:
113:
70:
249:] and allow AFD - In this case, the rule is strange but clear. Notability and
74:– Speedy deletion overturned. Can be sent to AfD by anybody who is interested.
877:
536:
521:
please. Can't assess G4 without access to the before/after versions, can we?
360:
351:
858:
Not sure why this was unsourced. Please undelete it so it can be worked on.
829:
Reason for deletion: (Expired BLPPROD, unsourced BLP) Here are two sources:
180:
626:. A second AfD after five years is ok. AfD1 !voters’ claims of meeting
929:
Okay, so will anyone here do this? Do I have to now go elsewhere?
841:. Office of the Secretary, U. S. Department of Transportation.
598:
makes this clearer they were not confused between CSD and AfD.
809:
795:
787:
779:
436:
422:
414:
406:
154:
140:
132:
124:
851:Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs
8:
907:per request, which could have been done at
751:The following is an archived debate of the
458:The article has got deleted through CSD as
378:The following is an archived debate of the
96:The following is an archived debate of the
709:
335:
63:
970:and speedy close per, if nothing else,
7:
976:Knowledge (XXG) is not a bureaucracy
1001:of the page listed in the heading.
839:Departmental Office of Civil Rights
698:of the page listed in the heading.
324:of the page listed in the heading.
630:appear to be entirely spurious. —
28:
997:The above is an archive of the
694:The above is an archive of the
320:The above is an archive of the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
359:00:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
1:
988:04:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
957:00:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
939:23:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
921:13:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
900:05:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
886:04:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
868:03:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
742:09:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
683:15:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
663:13:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
640:21:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
608:11:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
593:13:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
579:16:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
564:13:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
545:12:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
531:05:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
512:11:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
491:17:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
473:15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
369:00:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
311:14:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
280:09:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
263:17:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
238:13:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
228:. Survived AfD previously. —
221:05:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
200:17:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
87:08:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
853:. U. S. Department of Labor.
253:can be decided by the AFD.
1024:
479:Allow Re-Creation in Draft
188:Allow Re-Creation as Draft
1004:Please do not modify it.
911:or by asking an admin. —
758:Please do not modify it.
701:Please do not modify it.
385:Please do not modify it.
327:Please do not modify it.
207:Contra Robert McClenon,
103:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
847:"Charles E. James, Sr"
835:"Charles E. James, Sr"
769:Charles E. James, Sr.
717:Charles E. James, Sr.
755:of the page above.
651:Pepperfry (company)
649:did you check this
519:Undelete for review
396:Pepperfry (company)
382:of the page above.
343:Pepperfry (company)
100:of the page above.
980:Extraordinary Writ
1011:
1010:
708:
707:
535:Sorry, life, eh?
334:
333:
85:
1015:
1006:
854:
842:
824:
812:
798:
790:
782:
760:
731:
710:
703:
542:
501:
453:
448:
439:
425:
417:
409:
387:
366:
357:
336:
329:
308:
300:
167:
165:
157:
143:
135:
127:
105:
84:
82:
75:
64:
59:14 February 2021
53:
49:2021 February 15
35:2021 February 13
33:
1023:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1002:
999:deletion review
845:
833:
820:
819:
808:
807:
801:
794:
793:
786:
785:
778:
777:
756:
753:deletion review
725:
699:
696:deletion review
620:WP:NOTPROMOTION
540:
498:Robert McClenon
495:
483:Robert McClenon
449:
447:
444:
435:
434:
428:
421:
420:
413:
412:
405:
404:
383:
380:deletion review
364:
355:
325:
322:deletion review
304:
296:
255:Robert McClenon
192:Robert McClenon
161:
159:
153:
152:
146:
139:
138:
131:
130:
123:
122:
101:
98:deletion review
78:
76:
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1021:
1019:
1009:
1008:
993:
992:
991:
990:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
942:
941:
924:
923:
902:
888:
856:
855:
843:
827:
826:
817:
805:
799:
791:
783:
775:
763:
762:
747:
746:
745:
744:
706:
705:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
642:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
549:
548:
547:
516:
515:
514:
456:
455:
445:
432:
426:
418:
410:
402:
390:
389:
374:
373:
372:
371:
332:
331:
316:
315:
314:
313:
282:
265:
251:Promotionality
247:User:SmokeyJoe
240:
223:
202:
169:
168:
150:
144:
136:
128:
120:
108:
107:
92:
91:
90:
89:
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1020:
1007:
1005:
1000:
995:
994:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
966:
965:
958:
954:
950:
946:
945:
944:
943:
940:
936:
932:
928:
927:
926:
925:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
903:
901:
897:
893:
889:
887:
883:
879:
875:
872:
871:
870:
869:
865:
861:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
832:
831:
830:
823:
816:
811:
804:
797:
789:
781:
774:
770:
767:
766:
765:
764:
761:
759:
754:
749:
748:
743:
739:
735:
729:
723:
719:
718:
714:
713:
712:
711:
704:
702:
697:
692:
691:
684:
680:
676:
671:
666:
665:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
643:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
609:
605:
601:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
582:
581:
580:
576:
572:
567:
566:
565:
561:
557:
553:
550:
546:
543:
538:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
517:
513:
509:
505:
499:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
480:
477:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
461:
452:
443:
438:
431:
424:
416:
408:
401:
397:
394:
393:
392:
391:
388:
386:
381:
376:
375:
370:
367:
362:
358:
353:
349:
345:
344:
340:
339:
338:
337:
330:
328:
323:
318:
317:
312:
309:
307:
301:
299:
294:
293:SportingFlyer
290:
286:
283:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
185:
184:
182:
178:
174:
164:
156:
149:
142:
134:
126:
119:
115:
112:
111:
110:
109:
106:
104:
99:
94:
93:
88:
83:
81:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
44:2021 February
41:
36:
23:
19:
1003:
996:
967:
904:
857:
850:
838:
828:
757:
750:
715:
700:
693:
670:David Gerard
551:
518:
478:
457:
384:
377:
347:
341:
326:
319:
303:
295:
288:
284:
267:
243:Overturn G11
242:
225:
204:
187:
170:
102:
95:
79:
69:
58:
931:Philly jawn
860:Philly jawn
728:Philly jawn
289:Send to AfD
114:Fly Project
71:Fly Project
655:Tungut bey
600:Tungut bey
571:Tungut bey
504:Tungut bey
465:Tungut bey
348:Overturned
80:Sandstein
949:SmokeyJoe
913:SmokeyJoe
909:WP:REFUND
632:SmokeyJoe
585:SmokeyJoe
556:SmokeyJoe
230:SmokeyJoe
968:Undelete
905:Undelete
892:Jclemens
873:Hi, per
675:Jclemens
647:Jclemens
552:Overturn
523:Jclemens
285:Overturn
268:Overturn
226:Overturn
213:Jclemens
205:Overturn
20: |
822:restore
815:article
788:history
722:WP:BURO
628:WP:CORP
451:restore
415:history
245:as per
163:restore
133:history
972:WP:IAR
734:Stifle
624:WP:TNT
272:Stifle
878:Hobit
810:watch
803:links
460:WP:G4
437:watch
430:links
155:watch
148:links
52:: -->
16:<
984:talk
953:talk
935:talk
917:talk
896:talk
882:talk
864:talk
796:logs
780:edit
773:talk
738:talk
679:talk
659:talk
636:talk
604:talk
589:talk
575:talk
560:talk
537:Wily
527:talk
508:talk
487:talk
469:talk
423:logs
407:edit
400:talk
361:Wily
352:Wily
287:and
276:talk
259:talk
234:talk
217:talk
209:this
196:talk
141:logs
125:edit
118:talk
32:<
813:) (
442:XfD
440:) (
181:XXN
22:Log
986:)
978:.
955:)
937:)
919:)
898:)
884:)
866:)
849:.
837:.
740:)
724:.
681:)
661:)
638:)
606:)
591:)
577:)
562:)
529:)
510:)
489:)
471:)
346:–
278:)
261:)
236:)
219:)
198:)
183:,
175:,
42::
982:(
951:(
933:(
915:(
894:(
880:(
862:(
825:)
818:|
806:|
800:|
792:|
784:|
776:|
771:(
736:(
730::
726:@
677:(
657:(
653:?
634:(
602:(
587:(
573:(
558:(
541:D
525:(
506:(
500::
496:@
485:(
467:(
454:)
446:|
433:|
427:|
419:|
411:|
403:|
398:(
365:D
356:D
306:C
302:·
298:T
274:(
257:(
232:(
215:(
194:(
177:2
173:1
166:)
160:(
158:)
151:|
145:|
137:|
129:|
121:|
116:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.