Knowledge:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 25

4666:

groups have come up with their own flags (Source: www.thecopticflag.com) and same with this new one, the Coptic Church never recognizes any flag and Copts not affiliated with the creating organization have no idea about any flag. Unfortunately, the latest flag has adorned the Copts wikipedia article as the de facto symbol of Copts in a number of places (template, map). The source of this version is a website that has not been updates in 3 years. I tried to amend the page many times. The first few times I admit I didnt understand the nuances of Knowledge editing. But now, whenever I write something pertaining that this is not an accepted by mainstream Copts, two moderators (mostly Troy and sometimes Lanternix) remove my edit with the excuse "Where is your source that it is not accepted?". This is ludicrous since the burden of proof had to be on the creator of the symbol to show that it IS accepted as a symbol of Coptic Identity and can be used as a de facto worldwide accepted symbol. How can you prove a negative? Ironically, in the discussion page when I discussed this Troy responded with the preposterous statement: "There doesn't need to be a reliable source that says that it's "world-recognized"". So technically, I can come up with my own design for a flag to represent an ethnic group that lacks a flag and plaster it over the main article describing them??!! According to Troy, that would be sufficient??

273:)showing the context, which gave a more neutral point of view, but Vsmith removed my edit. What stands now is the unfounded pejorative characterization which is definitly non-NPOV. Another assult occurred on an article I posted two years ago, "Stellar ignition". Over time that article had been improved and an additional reference was added. Then, after I posted the "J. Marvin Herndon" page, Cquan made the page "Stellar ignition" disappear by redirecting the subject name to "Star formation" which is yet to carry any of the information content that was the basis of :Stellar ignition". Taken to gether these all seem to be a concerted attack against me and the work I have published. This is wrong. Science is about discovering the true nature of Earth and Universe and communicating that knowledge truthfully. There is no wiki prohibition about referencing one own work as long as it is done so objectively. All of my posts have been objective and fully referenced. It is wrong to claim "soapbox" and mount a systemic attack against me and my work. This is a serious matter which needs to be addressed. 269:

triggered an assult on nearly every Knowledge article pertaining to my work, al of which is published in world-class, peer-reviewed scientific journals. The most egregious assult seems to have been perpetrated by Vsmith. I have tried to reason with him on his talk page, but to no avail. For example, someone posted an article about some of my work entitled Whole-Earth decompression dynamics, Vsmith proposed it for deletion. Vsmith, along with D.H., was involved with removing the edit that I made to "Dynamo theory", removal which, as I explained on D.H.'s talk page, intentionally misleads wiki-readership. On the page, "Georeactor" someone had posted a quote from a newspaper article under the section 'criticism', which, taken out of context, was pejorative in the extreme. I added a brief statement ( referencing the whole story posted at

1658:

another article until I gave up all efforts to reach consensus with him. This had never happened to me before, and I was so frustrated that I resorted to "sock puppetry" (a violation that at the time I did not know existed). My subsequent attempt to apologize to this editor for harsh words and to achieve friendly relations was brusquely rebuffed. As far as the edits to article "KCBS-TV" are concerned, I really have no need to promote the rightness of my information--I peruse Knowledge merely for enjoyment--but I am beginning to feel uneasy about editing when I know there is another editor who awaits the chance to "put me in my place." Any further argument or "edit war" is not to my taste; I seek guidance or, if warranted, arbitration. Thank you in advance.

703:"Self-published books, zines, websites, and blogs should never be used as a source for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the article (see below). "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some newspapers host interactive columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control. Where a news organization publishes the opinions of a professional but claims no responsibility for the opinions, the writer of the cited piece should be attributed (e.g., "Jane Smith has suggested..."). Posts left by readers may never be used as sources" 1685:, you made 4 edits with UTC timestamps on 11 June; the 4th reverted the sum of the first 3, leaving the article unchanged. There are a further 6 with UTC stamps on 12 June which would have been on 11 June in any US timezone; the net effect of those 6 was reverted by Rollosmokes, about 2 1/2 hours after your last. Those are all the edits I see under your username; Rollosmokes has been editing that article since 9 May, if not earlier. There's no evidence that Rollosmokes followed you to that article; and his/her last revert isn't unreasonable either. 3519:

cleanup that should be. There is no central authority that cleans up articles. Rather we're all individual editors and because of the huge number of articles that are created every day (thousands), many slip through the cracks upon creation and may sit around for a very long time without anyone looking at them, tagging them, nominating them for deletion, etc. So generalizing from any article's existence or state to conclude something about other articles is a logic that doesn't work well here. A page that is relevant by analogy here is

4457:

not be the same person) have been either undoing the redirects, or adding new articles with (basically) the same name. I've dropped a message onto both talk pages saying why I've been redirecting, and suggesting a compromise (creating a discography article, merging all the albums into the discography, and redirecting the albums to the discography article - which I believe WP:MUSIC permits). I can't keep on reverting the articles, or I'm going to fall foul of 3RR, so what I'd like is an indication of:

3436:

advertise how good they are. As well, I see some of the checkmarks for features for WebEx are incorrect. Finally, the matrix was created with their points, to disclude others while omiting what other vendors provide that they do not. No single vendor should be allowed to do this, it is blatant abuse. Finally, I beleive Knowledge was never meant for vendor comparison matrix articles, the article should be deleted and the web conferencing article reverted to a previous version.

1423:, keep getting removed by one or two users (who seem to have a history of trying to harass this article in particular), even though these facts have been in the article ever since playmate stats on Knowledge were ever created, and should therefore remain in the article. Regardless of how people feel about playmate stats, until all of the stats have been removed on every single Playboy playmates's page, one playmate's page should not be blatantly vandalized. 35: 2978:

I'd like to know how to resolve this...He also claims he hired me for some minor routines. That is false. He came to me on a friday night begging me in tears that the company was going to refuse publishing it the way he did it and I had until 72 hours later to rewrite it. He never intended to pay me at all. In fact he said he thought I did it for the experience and he took the more than 50,000 dollars he made and went off to europe.

2832: 1438:

those readding the stats, you will note that those removing have a history of editing more than just one article, while some of those readding seem to possibly be sock puppets, with history (mainly or only) editing the Stephanie Adams page. Would appreciate assistance in mediating this matter. As mentioned on the article's talk page, Jimbo Wales commented in favour of removing the stats.

1086:, because I was interested in the subject material. What I found when I read it was that one of the people editing the article seems to be a first person to the situation. I pointed that out on the talk page and got a relatively bizarre response from the editor in question. Could someone review the discussion on the talk page and tell me if I'm off base? Thanks in advance! -- 3165:. That will tell you what criteria are used to determine whether a musician is "notable" by Knowledge standards and therefore whether they qualify for an article. Just as an aside, I'd say that Bruno Covington is not likely to pass the test - a Google search on "Bruno Covington saxophone" produces precisely three hits, two of which appear to relate to the deleted article. 1453:

There are lots of "controversial" playmates, but they all have stats on their pages. As per Knowledge articles on all playmates, these stats are consistent with the other ones, were always there, and therefore should remain. Remove them on every article after it is agreed to by Knowledge. But until then, removing it on one page is considered to be vandalism.

5153: 5085: 5014: 4745: 4546: 4130: 4037: 3939: 3720: 3637: 3383: 3072: 2952: 2641: 2061: 1779: 1500: 1056: 437: 3415:. I am working with Wikipedians to ensure the article is notable, citable, referenced, NPOV and not blatant advertising. Although I've found the process frustrating at times, I understand why policies must be enforced. But I am also a bit confused why I have been hammered so hard, yet many other articles seem to be under the radar. 1961:)I would also point out that the removal of the warning (with the edit summary of "got it, only newbies and trolls need template warnings") was largely unnecessary, as I wasn't really edit-warring, but instead following BRD. U-Mos' dogged determination to ensure that his (contended) version of the section remain in place was rather an 2441:. Would you like to move that into article-space, or are you asking for help in adding references first? I'd recommend the latter. Perhaps you can identify some of your sources, either at the bottom of the page or on the discussion tab, and I'll add some of them to the article. Then you can follow those examples. Would that work? -- 1749:

articles. While some legitimate reversion of vandalism is occurring, massive reverts of valid edits are sadly routine over there. The project is not a small one (1800 US full-power stations, plus non-US stations and low-power TV) and there is much information which needs to be added, but more effort seems to be expended on

5406: 5214: 4638: 4429: 2464: 2386: 2309: 2229: 1620: 1393: 1172: 926: 792: 648: 530: 295: 243: 117: 168:

into this. I discussed this with you on IRC, rather than here, simply because it was much better to do it in private rather than asking you about it in public - it wouldn't really have been fair on you. Yeah, I am considering filing an RFCU, or sending this to a CU, but I've got to investigate it further first.

5242:. I placed a {{merge| Incredible Hulk (film)}} with a rationale that the soundtrack on its own probably doesn't meet notability criteria and invited discussion. Another user refuses to discuss and simply removed the merge proposal. This is not the first time. I'd appreciate some neutral eyes. Thank you. 5041:

An article I'm cleaning up relates to various places in Ireland. The text, as written, has the place names in Irish, but articles exist about the places using the English versions of the place names. So what's the policy on creating links ? Do I pipe the link to the English article, create a redirect

4768:

I think I've found a case of an editor using Knowledge for self-promotion, but I'm not certain of the appropriate course of action. Can someone help with the exact procedure of how this should be dealt with? Do I post it somewhere? Do I just revert the articles? Should a warning be sent to the editor

4456:

Since they mostly comprise nothing but a track listing and a cover image (which I believe aren't licensed anyway), I've been changing the album articles to redirects to the Tom Angelripper article as per (my interpretation of) WP:MUSIC. However, two users - Scanion and 189.61.21.255 (which may or may

3562:

The simple fact of the matter is this is how things work. Knowledge has no center. Some things fall through the radar, some things don't. Your article is already shaping up to be something good; no need to worry about these other things. Our culture changes quite a bit over time... it's possible, for

2977:

I have of question of how to resolve some direct misinformation on wikipedia. the page is "Sword of Fargoal". My name is Scott Corsaire and I wrote the machine language programs that made the game playable. This was the heart of the video game and the author is removing credit to me to suit his ego.

2550:

How does one de-link the article? Couillard has now been linked to another Conservative senior aide, Bernard Cote, and has connections with a real estate company that sought Canadian Federal Government contracts. Also some Opposition party concerns that organized crime allegedly may seek to influence

2348:

Have offered to discuss this issue numerous times on the article's discussion page to help resolve this difference of opinion. There are a number of anonymous and very new accounts being used to revert edits made on the page. The user above has also vandalized my user page. Help would be appreciated.

2333:

Take a look at the article on this playmate and you will see that numerous users (Wandering Canadian in particular) have been vandalizing the article's "playmate stats" as well as removing important information from it. It's almost as if they have some sort of personal conflict with the individual in

1271:

I wasn't calling the admin that deleted the page a bully, nor did I call JPG-GR a bully. I didn't say specifics. If I had anything against any admin, I wouldn't have put the speedy delete tag on my own page. JPG-GR believes that the bully is "him" even though again, I didn't say anyone in particular.

1223:

ongoing war with another user User:Radiolbx. Not that its any of my business, since he is a different editor, but he is new to Knowledge and unlike you or I, may not understand policies yet. It took me several months to understand a lot about Knowledge. I sincerely feel that JPG-GR is attacking radio

681:

2.) Two editors of a Wiki BLP page apparently have editing powers of the BLP's websites. In one case, an editor cited the sermon hosted at their site, and while he was arguing with the editor, the link from the page disappeared. Another time, the editor changed information on a page he cited, while

268:

Recently, I posted an article "J. Marvin Herndon" which arroused some ire and after emails and discussion, there was some recognization that notability applied here, and the article was removed from the intention to delete catagory, and edits have begun to be made. Apparently, though, the interaction

2894:

for the article. There you can propose your definition of "fluff" and "helpful content". If you want my advice, I highly suggest you start small. I've read through the diffs you provided and it's hard to sort through the huge number of changes that were made to the article. Starting small on the

2363:

Your page was not vandalized. You vandalized the article mentioned above and was politely warned to stop doing so. All playmate statistics are contained in article on playmates and should not keep being removed. Not only are there editors who agree, but Knowledge agrees, simply because they continue

1868:

a comment I left on his talk page with a rather rude edit summary. What he's trying to acheive here I don't know, but it's getting way out of hand. He seems to generally assume superiority over all other editors in pretty much every edit he makes. Needless to say I'm not prepared to communicate with

1848:

talk pages, he completely ignores my request that he leaves things as they are for now, instead choosing to level minor personal attacks on me (I find his claims of ownership behaviour particularly hypocritical). As I am rather dissapointed to receive my first warning for this, and do not wish to be

1253:

This is making my brain hurt as well as Tony's. It looks to me like you removed a link to a deleted page with a comment about "page deleted by bully" and JPG-GR templated you as a result. That might have been excessive, but I too interpreted your edit summary as calling the deleting admin a bully. I

818:

Hello. I've made some edits to my company's Wiki page (MeadWestvaco) and someone felt at liberty to overwrite the changes suggesting they were PR-talk - the are not, the comments were taken directly from our SEC filing, which is a public and legal document. The content that is currently published is

321:

I want a pardon for my past edition on chirstianity in India and I am sorry for the same. I was influenced by some outside parties for the same. I confirm that I will not make any edition of similar nature in the future. I also confirm that I will fully abide by your policies. I had tired to contact

142:

I'm not sure exactly where to post this, but I need serious assistance. On The 8th of June 2008, I was on IRC, when I was requested to join a private channel, which contained 3 people; myself, User:Ryan Postlethwaite, and User:Tiptoety (whom I had an altercation with earlier today, he accused me of

5345:

I think that existence doesn't equal notability (I'm pretty sure we have policies that discuss what is or isn't notable). I think the reference/external links originally provided were to places to buy the album and not to anything that contributed to notability or verifiability. I think you haven't

5315:

My question in that case would be why not simply discuss on the article's talkpage instead of just removing the merge proposal tag? How is following the process of placing the tag and inviting discussion a behaviour issue? BTW if we are going to get into detail should we be discussing elsewhere? At

4665:

The Copts article has a flag adorning its website, and a worldmap with the same symbol. The problem is that this article discusses an ethnic group encompassing millions of people globally. A few years ago a small activist group came up with their version of a "coptic flag". In the past, many fringe

3518:

I do not have the time (or expertise in the subject area) to properly look at the articles you are speakng of but I can address the inconsistent enforcement aspect of your question. Plenty of articles exist that probably should not and many others are in a bad state that haven't yet been tagged for

3325:

is that the artist have won or placed in a "major music competition". It is pretty clear from the link you supplied that the JFJ Foundation Saxophone Contest, with its 12 entrants, open entry policy, 10 lay and semi-lay judges and $ 50 entry fee (or none, depending on which page you read) is by no

1222:

What I have come to notice is that this editor is attempting to act like an administrator and believes he has the authority to meddle with every single edit other editors do. The example above was me removing a page from my user page that was defunct and he automatically jumped on me. Same with the

4227:

the answers would be publicly available on the BBC World Service website to be listened to - permanently! Hardly OR!! And it is a talk with an author on public service radio - an entirely non-profit enterprise - mentioned on a talk page so that editors can ask questions to improve the article. Why

3096:

I created an article about Bruno Covington and someone deleted it. I knew it met all the standerds nothing was wrong with it. But someone deleted it. I dont know who did it. Is there a way I can get it back? I worked for a long time on that page. It has been deleted before that was becuse it didnt

1657:

in a summary fashion and without discussion (it was dismissed as "unnecessary"; all relevant information is contained in the article's archives). In fact the editor which made this deletion is one which I had been in contention with on similar subjects before; we had gone back and forth regarding

1452:

Again, it does not make sense to remove one, when they are all placed on every playmate's page. This celebrity page is no different from any other playmate's page. The only thing "controversial" is removing stats which were there long before when every other Playboy playmate's article was created.

1437:

This has been a fairly controversial article for a while, and there has been much debate on the talk page about the inclusion of the stats in the article. There has been no consensus for inclusion, and so I have removed (again) the stats. If you check the editing histories of those removing versus

677:

1.) Can I use the blog from a recognized authority as a source for a quote of a Wiki BLP? The blog is that of Tom Ascol, a minister and Executive Director of Founders Ministries (www.founders.org) Founders Ministries is a non-profit organization and has a Board of Directors supervising it. I'm not

5374:

I think the article talkpage would be appropriate to discuss this album or if there is a discussion underway about Albums in general and when they are/become notable we can discuss there. Or your talk page if you want to address the "behaviour" side of things (yours and mine). I'm not sure of the

3277:

The reason why it was deleted the first time was beacuse I just wrote "Bruno Covington" to save the page then I was going to come back and add everthing. And on the Notablity subject, like I said before having an article on him would give people a chance to learn about someone new who they didn't

3145:

I don't no everyone on the world or everone who's famous. Therefor someone should not have the right to delete an article just beacuse THEY don't know who it is and the article would allow people unfamilar with said person to learn about them. And you still did'nt answer my question. Can I get it

2527:

indicates, among other things, that we should be cautious with such articles, and generally should not present an article as a "biography" when really all it covers is a person's involvement in a single event or scandal. Normally, in that case, if the event, scandal, or person with whom they were

1748:

is veering dangerously toward one in which one individual (with occasional assistance of an accomplice or two) is systematically removing many contributions from outsiders as "irrelevant", "vandal", "non-consensus", "trivial", "sock puppet" or worse while forcing their own agenda on the series of

1229:

Both of us are human editors, radio and I. We certainly make mistakes just like everyone else. What I don't like is being attacked and put down for no reason, and having my edits torn apart. I would appreciate some intervention on this matter. If this is the wrong place for this complaint, please

211:

Have this user's contributions raised a concern of abusing multiple accounts? Using multiple accounts is acceptable in some circumstances, after all. A RFCU typically follows a SSP report. A note to Chafford about one thing you're doing and shouldn't be- don't revert on user talk pages. Users are

167:

I said to you that I didn't believe you were a new user given your earliest contributions. I don't believe that you're an IP editor, simply because of the clear knowledge of Knowledge process and twinkle seen in your earliest edits. I still don't believe you're a new editor and I am still looking

1953:

I am willing to accept my own culpability in the downwards descent of your behavior, but quite frankly, it takes two to tango. This consensus you claim to have in every article we are both involved in is both incorrect, and a pretty sad excuse for personal attacks and incivility. Maybe you and I

3575:

Please just focus on your article, and any others that interest you. Someone may find these complaints legitimate and funnel them through the proper channels (articles for deletion, prod, speedy, whatever). Someone might funnel them through those channels in 2015, if said channels were to still

1941:

immediately comes to mind) about how you should more closely examine your edits before reverting them, which rather fell on deaf ears. Look at the continuity points you keep insisting should be there. Use the discussion page to bring them up and - at the risk of sounding like a broken record -

479:

It looks quite clean to me, and so I removed the conflict of interest and advertisement templates. I suppose fact of the COI remains, but I didn't see it working its way into the article. BTW, the Talk page indicates that the image may be deleted - you may want to follow up on that to get the

3435:

perspective and facts are unreferenced. Many PRIMARY features common to all major web conferencing products are missing, so it's pretty much useless. Such an undertaking requires months of research. My perception is that they created a comparison of what they have to show their checkmarks to

1302:

On the question of Radiolbx, s/he can raise his/her own concerns if need be. I can't understand what happened there, not least because you edited Radiolbx's talkpage and that was out of line. I think I would recommend that you assume good faith and go back to constructive editing/writing. This

463:

Hello, This page has included notices about neutral content and conflict of interest for some time. I have ensured that the content is neutral and have used the Society's logo purely for identification purposes (there is another company - Teachers Assurance - that people sometimes confuse with

4468:

I should say that I don't expect an answer to my talk page messages yet, as I only put my message there within the last few hours, so have no idea if they'll accept the discography article idea, but I'd like some experienced advice on whether I should even proceed any further, and if so, how.

2175:

Hmm, somehow I never found that Bot requests page. I guess I was just impatient, trying to be bold, to get the templates working like they should and at first glance, WikiProject Kansas looked inactive. I'll go through the channels you recommended to get the mess straightened out. Thanks.

2253:

Hi, My grandfather, Thomas Gibbons, is referenced in a Knowledge article in the same name (He was a past police commissioner in Philadelphia). I have a photograph of him that I would like to post, however, I do not have permission to do so. I am honestly not interested in becoming a regular

148:

Apon entering this channel, I was instantly blitzed with questions demanding that I "tell them who I was", I explained that I had previously edited as an IP, and that I had decided to create an account for myself. I was immediately treated as a liar, and was threatend with a checkuser case.

5330:

You want to merge the page because it is not notable. Listen there is enough of the links in the main page to prove the soundtrack existence. It is pretty hard to find notable links for soundtracks. So tell me expert do you know where to get notable links to make the article to be valid?.

4307:

I think the first thing would be to try to avoid making a big deal out of this. While I don't think it's right to link to those broadcasts, I also don't think it ranks very high on the list of things to address. It might not be worth the effort it would take you to convince the other user.

4813:

However, I am not an experienced editor to be able to completely track his movements and conclusively determine if this is indeed a case of self-promotion. I also don't know the appropriate procedures to reverse all the damage and more importantly prevent him from doing so in the future.

3523:. So it is not at all uncommon that one crapfest article never gets tagged, and a better but still problematic article is created within moments that two experienced editors land on simultaneously. In the end, though, which do you think will result in a better article? Cheers.-- 1298:

On the deletion/bully incident, I don't know who you thought was a bully; your comments were ambiguous. It might have been better to use another form of words. We might let JPG-GR speak to his/her own beliefs rather than assuming we know what they are; I don't think that will

5175:

My biographical entry 'Linda Proud' has been labelled as having an inappropriate tone, which I agree with. I've therefore made several deletions in the content. Now I would like to know how to get the label removed but I don't have the required expertise. I'd appreciate any

965:, why targeting my other posts? Always reiterating my sources. I got my sources directly from a reputable site, which owned the franchise related to my entries. As I’ve checked the history of that entry, all of them (the users) undoing everything. Even it’s a valid edition. 1949:

It also bears mentioning that your approach to any discussion is confrontational and somewhat uncivil and attack-y; you have also been asked to curb that behavior. It became such that you had to be asked to abstain from posting to me on my user talk page on at least one

1127:

ever so slightly freaked out, I wasn't sure what to do. I looked at his talk page and it looks like this isn't the first time with this time of misunderstanding. I just don't think he understands the policies, but I could be wrong. Anyway, thanks for the looksie!

5300:. The movie is notable so do soundtrack. I don't like the idea of soundtrack being merge. They deserve to have a separate page. Iam not just talking about The Incredible Hulk soundtrack but for all movies and games soundtrack. They deserve to have a separate page. -- 722:

besides the detractor who keeps causing all these problems? And from someone who has actually made a contribution to Wiki? I've already read the Wiki guidelines which this disruptive editor (read his contribs page) has posted PARTS of, and they aren't real clear.

3673:

Would someone look at the dispute regarding the deletion of the Joel Widzer page? I think a hot headed edit war pursue and the result was deletion of the page. The past history should support that the page editors have tried to adhere to proper guidelines-thank you

3576:

exist. Some others might build on those article to be as high a quality as yours is shaping up to be. With all this said, it's obvious you're working in good faith, and I applaud you for that; it doesn't happen too often with COIs. But pushing at this may soon look

1836:, which of course he has every right to do. But even though consesnsus appears to be going against him here also, he adamantly believes that his controversial viewpoint should stand while the discussion is ongoing, rather than the current legislation as outlined in 1108:

in this article. However, it looks like most of his recent contributions have been reverted. The whole article is a bit of a mess; I'll try to clean it up later on. A lot of the legal stuff ought to be moved out to another article - which might or might not endure.

3539:

How do I report the above issues to be tagged as such ? (No references, blatant advertising, conflict of interest, unnotable, inaprorpriate content (competitive matrix comparison) and speedy delete). Links to examples would be nice (I'm still a newbie). Am I in

2254:

editor/poster, but I though the picture would be added content for the page. The photograph was taken by his sister, who is now deceased -- it now belongs to my father. If there is any way to get it posted, please let me know. Thanks so much! Carey Roberts

755:

Romans9:11, the problem you are complaining about of people editing the sources is a very good reason we don't allow self-published sources. If you cite a blog, then the blogger decides they don't like the article, they just change their blog, and voila!

4518:

You could well be right. I think AfD is the place that will most likely resolve this, if you don't get a constructive response on the talk pages. The discography has some unusual formatting too. Not ugly or anything, but certainly non-standard. btw, it's

1562:

about whether the names should be moved back and see if there is consensus either way. This page is really not high profile enough to get you a large response, and it's not targted to users especially familiar with naming conventions. I'd try posting at

2106:. Obviously, there is no need for all 3 templates to exist. I tried doing simple redirects of the first two templates to the third, but the formatting broke on many article talk pages. Basically, I would like assistance merging 3 templates into 1. -- 3307:

While it is certainly true that Knowledge is a great place to learn things that one didn't know before, that doesn't imply the converse - namely, that someone should be in Knowledge by reason of the fact that no one has heard of them. Take a look at

4803:. I assume he has added at some point in time, perhaps under another username or as a guest since his username doesn't appear on those pages. But, they all feel out of place, talking about him with great praise while mentioning his contributions. 5057:

All legitimate alternate names of topics should have redirects. Where English language articles on places use anglified name, creating redirects to the native names is de rigueur so I'd go ahead and do that. For the balance please see the MoS at

4788:. I am in the field and have never heard of him, so I searched for him on Google Scholar and he essentially has written a handful of articles in mediocre journals. So, definitely not a leading author on the topic worth mentioning on those pages. 3747:

I recently had a bit of an issue over the Audrey Hepburn article. I added a note about Bunny Mellon in the "Death" section. Rightly, someone named "wikidon" told me to add a reference, but instead of waiting for me to do so, deleted my edit.

4669:

Additionally, as evidence that Troy and LAnternix are being completely obtuse, they summarily reject my edits when I add the statement that other groups in the past have created coptic flags, and I listed the source (www.thecopticflag.com).

4282:

that is an inaccurate representation of what I said. I said that the post alerts editors to the opportunity to improve the article (justification). And the notice takes a couple of lines - it is not a big deal (appeal to your common sense).

1008:, espcially on minimal usage. The five logos are already enough to generally illustrate the difference between Idol series logos. About twenty or so is way too many. As for sources, blogs and forums are not the best sources of info; read 357:

I'm not sure which edit or edits you are referring to, but I would have thought that the best way forward is to simply start contributing constructively to the encyclopaedia. Also, if you haven't already done so, consider getting a user

1254:

then see where you posted on JPG-GR's page with a rationale, which was inventive but not entirely convincing to me. I'm sorry that you feel under attack, but the evidence you posted here doesn't really establish a long-running pattern.

5457:

See above: "The description of the issue with which you need help should be concise and neutral." If you go for mediation, you should make it easy for your counterpart to be constructive by avoiding blaming, accusing, criticising and

498:

remains since you appear to be connected to the Building Society (from your username). Just be careful when editing pages about things you are connected to. The article could really do with some references to coverage in third party

5375:

most appropriate place in all honesty. I think maybe a suggestion on where from a 3rd party may be appropriate if you are okay with that (I'm happy to have either of the above two contributors as an unofficial mediator if need be).

2895:

talk page will help you come to an agreement with the other editors that are changing the page. Once you come to an agreement on something small, moving forward will be easier. Come back here if using the talk page doesn't work.

1357:

Disappointing, for sure, but I don't see any ongoing problem... I don't even see anything specific I can point to and say, "Ah hah, if I were JPG-GR, I would have done this differently!" I advise him of some more moderate means of

1349:

I'm a little disappointed in that outcome, as I believe Radiolbx was acting in good faith. I can't really point to anything specific that JPG-GR did wrong, though, and near the end Radiolbx was beginning to behave in an

2589:

describes him as a "senior staffer". That means that Couillard's only claim to notability is still through Bernier, and since Couillard wouldn't pass notability on her own, proper practice would be to keep the redirect.

2093:

and noticed they have a mess on their hands with their banner template: they have 3 of them. Two of them must be from the early days of WikiProjects because they seem to be just banners without assessment capabilities:

4176:

that the messages perform a "valuable service" and that I'm being "priggish". Am I? They have since removed my prior comments to their talk page. Some illumination would help. Are messages of this kind acceptable?

3195:

I could not confirm the existence of either the JFJ Foundation or its saxophone contest in a quick Google search. That suggests - but of course does not prove - that it is not a major music competition as specified in

870:

revert. Two major problems with your edits: 1) You made it read like an advertisement, 2) you completely removed the section "Environmental record", which was properly cited. It's not acceptable to whitewash articles.

4204:

Hello, I don't think you're wrong here. I don't believe that's how talk pages are to be used. And in particular, if an editor were to ask a direct question of an author in this context, I'm not sure that wouldn't be

1346:) was making edits that had an unencyclopedic tone and were a potential conflict of interest. JPG-GR reverted his changes. The discussion turned a little nasty, and Radiolbx eventually gave up and left the project. 3204:

sources that would establish the importance of the competition, as well as Covington's having won it in 1996, then the article would certainly be at risk for speedy deletion (which appears to be what happened).

3024:

I will take a look at the article. Even if you do not have verifiable proof of what you allege, it is possible that the misleading information is also unsupported by sources, so we could at least remove that.

5434:- see the Nirmala Srivastava section. The page in question is currently frozen due to edit wars. I have found an error in this section and have proposed re-wording it using a new source. However, there is one 4013:

Hello, Thanks for bringing this up here. I just checked the article and those manufacturers are no longer shown in the article; I believe that's appropriate. This is an encyclopaedia, not a web directory.

151:

I need this sorted out, this is completely unacceptable conduct for administrators, and the whole experience has left me quite shaken and has seriously dented my veiws of Knowledge as a whole. Thank you.

4570:

Hi, I need help learning how to learn to use Knowledge so I can edit and create articles, and work on images. I will have more free time since school is out and would like to volunteer some time. Tia--

5346:

bothered to answer any of my questions. I also think this is better discussed in a mature and adult manner at a different section as I'm pretty sure this isn't what Editor Assistance is actually for.

1529:

has moved a multitude (900+) of articles from the format of "Roman Catholic Diocese of Foo" to "Diocese of Foo" for the time period from April 2008 thru June 2008 without concensus or support of a

5438:

editor who is resisting the introduction of this new reference using multiple spurious arguments. Due to the fact that this page is frozen and conveys his POV, it seems to be in his interest to

3262:

Thanks. I am afraid, though, that the link does nothing to establish the notability of the competition. The decision to delete the Bruno Covington page appears to have been a sound one.

4228:

not spend your time more usefully by going through wikipedia removing every mention of an upcoming tour date of a musician or promo website for a film which are commmercial enterprises?

5042:

for the Irish name to the English named article (I've checked that they don't currently exist), or change the text to the English name, with the Irish name in parentheses ? Cheers :-)

3223:

As other user's have said, it is difficult for us to see notability. This may be because the subject is not notable, or it may just be due to ignorance on our part. If you can find

4700:

and simply forgot to long in. I want to look into the whole thing before I comment and would appreciate being able to look at it from a fully informed starting point. Thank you.

556:

i tried to enter information like every other travel site. Travelocity, Orbitz, Expedia, etc. and they all have the same information i uploaded. i think it is totaly unfair.

4503:

Although Scanion has created a discography article, the original articles still remain, with a link to the discography. So, unfortunately, my original questions still stand.

3021:. While I have no doubt your allegations are true, do you have a reliable source we could cite to support what you say? In the absence of this, there is not much we can do. 2500:

The two individuals are connected but Bernier is not Couillaird. They are separate individuals and should have separate articles IMO. Is it possible for an editor to de-link

2700:

I've declined the second as it should be kept as an archive of previous conversation. I'd move it to something like Archive 1? I'll take care of the first page in a moment.

4093: 1303:

posting will remain in an archive as a checkpoint. If there are subsequent incidents then we can consider them, but I think you're making too much out of rather little. --

1937:'. I would advise you to more closely examine your edits (or rather edit-warring reverts) and look at the bits you keep editing in. I've pointed out numerous times (your 1558:

Given the large scale of the moves, I think your best course of action is to advertise the issue in a few carefully chosen places directing users to comment centrally at

212:

generally allowed to remove warnings from their own page. If there is a request to block or take other action, it can still be seen in the history that they were warned.

3431:). Although the concept of a maxtrix comparison is good, the article does not list other major vendors such as GoTo or LiveMeeting (or WebTrain), it is written from a 1901:

Users can remove warnings from their talk pages apart from those concerning unblock requests I believe, it is considered evidence that it has been read and understood.

1989: 2746:

It's important to retain the /talk item, especially as it contains some of the complaints about that user messing with other user's workpages, about which there is a

1213:. I feel this editor is putting personal attack warnings on pages without merit. For example, he recently put a threatening personal attack warning on my talk page 101: 93: 88: 76: 71: 63: 3975:

I was informed that it is against your policy to include company names and same have been removed. However, I found now that again these company names are listed?

5108: 2750:

thread. The user has somehow got the notion that workpages are the same things as articles, and that he has a right to mess with them as he sees fit. He doesn't.

2157:; there's one for the Chicago project that is somewhat similar. I strongly recommend getting consensus among anyone active at WikiProject Kansas first, though. -- 1745: 2411:

Having trouble psoting the article I pasted in and even editing. Can't really understand what is needed to uplead the article with the sources. Please help

3503:

and the abuse of policies? Perhaps some Wikipedian editor with the appropriate rights can address the issues relating to the articles mentioned. Thank you.

5130:

At present, the former is a redirect to the latter. We do that often when one page can be known by more than one name. I think everything is in order here. --

1849:

caught in an edit war or be blocked, I have not reverted his removals again but have come here instead. Please can someone help common sense to pervail here?

3906:

I realized the edit was not taken out, but I was shocked at the accusation.....I appreciate all the help and am happy that the situation has been resolved.

3043:

Almost everything in the "History" section is completely unverifiable. I trimmed it back to just a couple of sentences that are actually supported by

5185: 5169: 1688:

If you have other concerns then please bring them up here, or on my talk page if you prefer, but I don't see that there's a problem to solve here. --

3278:

know about before. Isn't that what this website all about? Learing new things and getting more informed about things you already were fimilar with.

2878: 378:

If you could be more specific, as in what you changed and the date; then we can at least figure out what IP address or account you're referring to.

617:

that will help to demonstrate notability. One last thing, I don't know if you are in some way connected to Travelonly, but if you are, please read

4067:

I think it should be in Knowledge, but I'm not a registered user... any chance you, or one of your friends, might want to make an article for it?

3967: 3428: 4461:

Whether my interpretation of the WP:MUSIC guideline is correct, or at least reasonable in this case - if not, then I don't need to go any further

2364:

to keep info boxes with playmate information. Removing one is considered vandalism because it destroys the consistency of the playmate articles.

2283:

describes how to upload images. You'll need to show that you own the image and that you grant the appropriate licence to Knowledge to use it. --

1123:

I agree with you there. I had intended on doing something similar to what you mentioned when I had time, but after his response where it seems

5112: 1559: 1538: 5270: 3998: 3702: 2967: 2848: 2599: 2479: 2401: 2044: 2032: 1833: 1798: 1727: 1635: 1038: 906: 880: 387: 221: 3693:

was a bit trigger happy after the AfD). The concern was a conflict of interest; it's been cut down quite a bit, just needs further cleanup.

3563:

instance, that some of those articles were created long before the current culture that doesn't want your article in mainspace ever existed

2720:

Little overlap. I just deleted the first one, noted your decline of the speedy on the second. I agree with Seraphim Whipp, just move it to

4918: 4876: 1424: 857: 409: 342: 21: 4248:

The user in question is adamantly supportive of their messages under the argument that "it's no big deal". See my talk page. What now?

3341:

Yes this helps. Hopefully he will be able to have an article sometime. He is a real musician. I have one of his abums. I could upload it.

2202:

going to recommend copying the good template over the other 2, but the summary matrix for the Project probably wouldn't work correctly. --

2102:. The third template is the one linked to the project's assessment stats and is capitalized incorrectly compared to other WikiProjects: 1020:

to make sure if your sources are reliable at all. I'm just reminding you of what you are doing, so don't take it personally on us. (Read

601:

was deleted because an administrator believed it to be blatant advertising. Don't take it personally. Knowledge has certain standards of

4904: 4722: 4679: 4348: 4262: 4191: 4077: 2269: 1754: 678:

wanting to quote an opinion from the blog, but some quotes he includes from a sermon of a minister that is no longer available online.

613:, so many companies do not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion. See if you can find any significant coverage of Travelonly in 5116: 4932: 4848: 2535:, we will redirect the non-notable person's name to the name of the event or another appropriate article. Hope that clears things up! 2365: 3757:

I hardly think this minor episode amounts to warring, and I'd like to know who posted it and what can be done about this behaviour.

4974: 4890: 4464:

If correct/reasonable, what can be done (if anything) to prevent, or at least discourage, the recreation of the individual articles.

4376:

Talk pages are to facilitate the improvement of articles. "Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article."

2122: 1564: 5442:

all proposed changes. What do I do - request mediation or seek to unfreeze the article? Are you able to take a look? Best regards,

3972:

I had asked that our company name could also be included as we are manufacturer and export of batteries just like SAFT / Marathon.

2586: 5239: 4960: 4862: 1837: 738: 197:

You can believe what you want, I just don't see why you are so concerned about me, have you nothing better to do? Evedently not.

1145:, restoring the article to the state it was in just prior to August 2007. The article needs further cleanup and citation yet. 322:

you in past by sending an e mail but the same was not fruitful. I deeply regret my action. Please advice me the way for pardon.

4946: 1706:

Looking specifically at Rollosmokes' edit, I think your first paragraph was easier to read, but the second had a great deal of

5296:

It is Jasynnash2 who is having behavior problem not me. All iam trying to do is creating a page for soundtracks and expanding

4377: 3921: 3772: 2908: 2426: 1595: 1568: 1534: 1469: 1343: 986: 618: 571: 331: 4673:

I urge the editors to look into this to attempt to create an ACCURATE article rather than one that is at odds with reality.

2677:

I've decided to go another direction and let Mizabot handle archiving my talk page. Can someone delete this subpage for me?

3002: 760:

has changed once again. I would lean highly against using info from a blog, no matter how well respected the blogger is.

2872: 2555:. If you want all this in the Maxime Bernier article thats fine but I really do think it belongs in a separate article. 2354: 2335: 2090: 1454: 1443: 831: 2618:

article and if it overwhelms the original article it will eventually get split off. It that how it works at wikipedia?

2339: 1458: 2721: 2682: 2134: 2130: 2103: 2099: 1829: 51: 17: 4394:

Thanks for your comments. As an aside, the question of not-for-profit vs profit-making is a red herring, I think. --

1832:(sections 21-25), where consensus hugely overwhelmed his views. He has suggested continuity sections are removed in 3462: 3412: 2489:

I'm not sure why this happened or if there is some reasoning that I don't understand behind this but an article on

416: 42: 5279:

I have left a polite note saying that discussion would be more helpful, and have pointed them to this discussion.

5297: 5266: 5067: 4002: 3698: 3528: 2963: 2844: 2595: 2475: 2397: 2040: 1794: 1723: 1631: 1584: 1526: 1034: 902: 876: 464:

Teachers Building Society). Can someone review the page so that the notices might be removed please? Many thanks

383: 217: 1575:, but many of the most knowledgeable people on naming conventions may see it there), and maybe you could post a 3964:

I had written 6 weeks ago about listing of SAFT and Marathon as suppliers of aircraft batteries in below link.

3346: 3297: 3283: 3252: 3185: 3151: 3136: 3102: 2891: 2777: 2706: 1257:

If there are more substantial incidents then please point them out, but this seems like a storm in a teacup. --

412:. I looked over some of their edit history and various bits of vandalism seem to have been reverted already. - 346: 278: 4912: 4870: 3180:

I read the criteria and Bruno Covington won the JFJ Foundation Saxophone Contest in 1996. So he does qualify.

1428: 853: 4898: 2866: 5520: 5505: 5490: 5467: 5451: 5424: 5384: 5369: 5355: 5340: 5325: 5309: 5288: 5274: 5251: 5232: 5200: 5139: 5124: 5101: 5071: 5051: 5032: 5000: 4926: 4842: 4831: 4762: 4730: 4726: 4709: 4687: 4683: 4656: 4621: 4579: 4564: 4532: 4512: 4497: 4478: 4447: 4403: 4389: 4355: 4342: 4317: 4292: 4269: 4256: 4237: 4218: 4198: 4185: 4146: 4109: 4085: 4081: 4053: 4023: 4006: 3955: 3925: 3898: 3850: 3826: 3776: 3738: 3706: 3683: 3667: 3618: 3614: 3598: 3553: 3549: 3532: 3512: 3508: 3408: 3401: 3369: 3350: 3335: 3301: 3287: 3271: 3256: 3236: 3214: 3189: 3174: 3155: 3140: 3125: 3106: 3090: 3056: 3034: 3006: 2971: 2934: 2912: 2884: 2852: 2807: 2782: 2754: 2733: 2711: 2694: 2671: 2627: 2603: 2564: 2541: 2517: 2483: 2450: 2430: 2405: 2373: 2369: 2358: 2350: 2343: 2327: 2292: 2273: 2265: 2247: 2211: 2185: 2166: 2146: 2126: 2115: 2095: 2083: 2048: 2025: 2000: 1980: 1910: 1896: 1878: 1858: 1802: 1762: 1758: 1731: 1697: 1675: 1639: 1607: 1588: 1552: 1520: 1483: 1462: 1447: 1439: 1432: 1413: 1375: 1312: 1285: 1266: 1247: 1192: 1154: 1136: 1118: 1094: 1076: 1042: 990: 945: 910: 884: 837: 812: 776: 742: 712: 694: 668: 632: 592: 575: 550: 514: 489: 473: 457: 419: 391: 369: 350: 315: 282: 262: 225: 206: 192: 169: 161: 136: 4968: 3321:

As for showing that a competition is notable - I paraphrased a bit loosely there. The actual criterion in

5419: 5227: 5181: 5120: 5059: 5047: 5027: 4856: 4777: 4757: 4651: 4559: 4508: 4493: 4474: 4442: 3733: 3396: 3085: 2690: 2678: 2322: 2242: 2154: 2078: 2069: 1478: 1226:

and assuming he knows the rules, which may or may not be true. Radio is having trouble defending himself!

627: 509: 364: 4940: 4908: 4866: 3342: 3293: 3279: 3248: 3181: 3147: 3132: 3098: 849: 274: 5196: 5165: 5135: 5097: 4894: 4884: 4598: 4528: 4399: 4313: 4214: 4142: 4105: 4049: 4019: 3951: 3843: 3819: 2729: 2446: 2288: 2261: 2207: 2162: 2142: 1906: 1828:

has persisted to remove sourced continuity points from this article. This follows lengthy discussion in

1693: 1308: 1262: 1114: 763:

Can you give me a diff of the edit you are having trouble with? A guide to creating diffs can be found

413: 202: 157: 4981: 4922: 4838: 4807: 4785: 3754:

Today, I got a sockpuppet telling me that I am edit warring and giving me a warning about blocking me.

503:. As for the image, it should be fine. the warning on the talkpage seems to refer to an old version. -- 4964: 4880: 4773: 5380: 5351: 5321: 5262: 5247: 5177: 5063: 4954: 4950: 4852: 4718: 4705: 4616: 4606: 4073: 3994: 3909: 3877: 3760: 3694: 3679: 3675: 3646: 3541: 3524: 3520: 3113: 2990: 2959: 2840: 2650: 2591: 2471: 2414: 2393: 2257: 2181: 2111: 2036: 1790: 1719: 1627: 1580: 1548: 1029: 974: 898: 872: 845: 822:

I am very concerned that someone without knowledge of the company has the right to undo my changes.

734: 726: 690: 559: 469: 465: 379: 338: 288:

I want a pardon for my past edition and I am sorry for the same. Please advice me the way for pardon.

213: 4936: 1124: 1101: 5501: 5463: 5365: 5336: 5305: 4575: 3913: 3764: 3594: 3361: 3327: 3263: 3206: 3166: 3121: 2981:

The money is not the issue, but the false information IS. It is insulting and inaccurate grossly.

2823: 2772: 2701: 1671: 1663: 1508: 1401: 1366:, and he seemed grateful for the advice. I'm just not sure what other action you want taken...? -- 1216:, which had no merit. After I tried explaining to him why he had no merit, I get attacked in reply 1180: 1146: 1064: 1063:(I hope) More eyes are on the article, and the original poster seems to have been proved correct. 933: 800: 656: 538: 481: 445: 303: 250: 198: 153: 124: 5481:

editor who is resisting the introduction of this new reference has just identified himself above.

3788: 3427:

article once listed vendors (see history), it is now replaced by a biased matrix comparison (see:

2994: 2619: 2582: 2556: 2509: 621:

and be aware that editing articles about subjects you are connected to is strongly discouraged. --

5516: 5486: 5447: 4996: 4631:

Article Page Fraught with bias and error, moderators biased refuse to allow clarifying statements

4520: 4336: 4250: 4179: 4097: 3917: 3870:

that accusation, and the 3RR template was accidentally left behind on your user talk page. I've

3768: 3610: 3545: 3504: 3492: 3466: 3458: 3451: 3439: 3432: 3365: 3331: 3267: 3232: 3210: 3201: 3170: 3052: 3030: 2930: 2904: 2804: 2751: 2536: 2422: 1769: 1603: 1371: 1337: 1281: 1243: 1235: 1150: 982: 897:

you've done this before, and it was also reverted. Administrator intervention might be in order.

828: 772: 708: 567: 485: 3544:

since these organizations are competitors? Does everyone have rights to mark articles as such?

752:

First off, Johnb, you are too an editor, anybody who makes any edit to Knowledge is an editor :)

598: 3500: 3474: 1205:

I have already asked an administrator to help and was directed here. Here is what I asked for:

5414: 5222: 5043: 5022: 4752: 4646: 4554: 4504: 4489: 4470: 4437: 4385: 4288: 4233: 3856: 3728: 3391: 3080: 2998: 2686: 2623: 2560: 2513: 2317: 2237: 2073: 2018: 1973: 1841: 1473: 894: 700:

I'm not an editor but since did find the answer to this question straight from wiki policy...

622: 585: 504: 359: 4984:

for deletion. If any of the other accounts starts editing disruptively, I will report it to

4806:

In fact, I don't think he is a significant enough researcher to have his own personal page (

2614:

It sounds like the best way to handle this is to create a Julie Couillard section within the

5431: 5192: 5161: 5131: 5093: 4827: 4792: 4524: 4395: 4309: 4210: 4138: 4101: 4045: 4015: 3947: 3836: 3812: 3488: 3447: 3443: 3424: 2943: 2725: 2442: 2284: 2280: 2203: 2158: 2138: 1902: 1689: 1654: 1304: 1258: 1141:

I made a quick pass at removing all of the information relating to the personal travails of

1110: 1021: 834: 610: 2925:

is the next step in resolving this content dispute. Thanks for coming here for help! :) --

2864:. Further they are accusing people who do a revert to then original article as vandalism. 685:

Can you tell me what, if anything we can do about this editing of sources by wiki editors?

5376: 5347: 5317: 5284: 5243: 4781: 4701: 4610: 4594: 4488:- ignore this please - Scanion is in the process of creating a discography article... :-) 4420: 3322: 3197: 3162: 2501: 2490: 2299: 2177: 2107: 1996: 1892: 1874: 1854: 1845: 1544: 1420: 1351: 1129: 1087: 1025: 1000:

I think you still have a lot of policies to read and understand. Concerning your edits on

730: 686: 2523:

Actually, this appears to be intentional and in line with normal practice. Our policy on

3376:

Blatant Advertising | No References | Misleading Information | Blatant Abuse of Policies

5497: 5459: 5361: 5332: 5301: 4602: 4590: 4571: 4168:. These adverts were posted in good faith, but as I explained on the user's talk page 4157: 4153: 4120: 4116: 3832: 3804: 3590: 3577: 3357: 3313: 3117: 2615: 2505: 2494: 1869:

him further under the current circumstances. All the evidence has been presented here.

1667: 1659: 1646: 1530: 1142: 1017: 3461:

article, it reads like "Hey, here's my features". AS I previously stated, my article

819:

inaccurate and out of date. My corrections were an attempt to rememdy those issues.

5512: 5482: 5443: 4992: 4985: 4697: 3478: 3309: 3228: 3048: 3026: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2900: 2747: 2524: 2438: 2418: 1962: 1934: 1750: 1741: 1599: 1576: 1367: 1363: 1333: 1277: 1273: 1239: 1105: 1013: 1005: 978: 768: 764: 704: 563: 495: 405: 5257:

I see they've removed a notability tag as well. I'm neutral to both, but discussion

5062:(the answer there is that it depends on context, which you know better than I do).-- 5478: 5474: 5439: 5435: 4796: 4381: 4284: 4229: 4206: 3796: 3784: 3224: 3044: 3018: 2552: 2011: 2007: 1966: 1825: 1786: 1715: 1707: 1359: 614: 500: 4453:

Hi. Could someone please review the album articles associated with this artist ?

3316:

to get a sense of the kinds of articles that are appropriate for the encyclopedia.

1598:

regarding this matter; we could discuss this there if all are content with this.--

2771:

I saw that discussion (it led me here), which was why I declined the 2nd speedy.

2585:; a google search makes it look like Cote wouldn't pass notability- for example, 4823: 4586: 3014: 2578: 2532: 2137:

is on less than 200. Seems like a bot would be useful to do the replacements. --

1711: 1210: 1199: 1009: 1001: 962: 606: 602: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4837:

Quite right. Also note that the following users appear to be the same person:

2121:

Well, this is something you should bring up at that WikiProject too. There was

1681:

I'm not sure what outcome you're looking for here. According to the history of

404:

This anon seems to have been editing in conjunction with another anon (also at

5280: 1992: 1888: 1870: 1850: 958: 3454:

and disclude every company that has helped advance the technology (sarcasm).

1209:

I was wondering if you could help me with an issue I have with another user.

2858:

Some people are removing the informative and helpful content of the article

1921:) Considering that the diffs you point out were countered by you each time ( 1083: 757: 4059:

I just finished watching a wonderful documentary movie called "Heavy Load"

3013:

Hi Scott. Thank you for your concern. One of the pillars of Knowledge is

1933:), I think the appropriate response would be something along the lines of ' 2551:

politicians thru individuals such has Couillard who has past links to the

2334:

the article and this is not a place to indirectly rant about celebrities.

4800: 4585:

Hello! Thank you for your interest. the best place to get started is the

3245: 2890:

Thank you for coming here fore help. You can discuss your issues on the

4062: 537:

Questions answered, perhaps not to the original poster's satisfaction.

270: 3988: 3580:, even though your worries are in good faith (of that I have no doubt). 1682: 1650: 3481:

does not include references, at best, their references are their own.

2125:

of templates a while back, but it wasn't clearly resolved. Right now,

1238:

talk page. I would appreciate some assistance on this matter. Thanks!

4589:, where you can learn how to contribute and test making edits in the 3496: 3470: 3487:. Can someone please determine the proper course of action for the 3292:

And what do you need to establish the notablity of the competition?

4605:

and start editing! Feel free to ask any questions that arise on my

3244:

I was searching all over the web last night and a found a website.

3227:

to back up your claims of notability, the article could be kept. --

4628: 4334:

Fair enough. I've made my view known and I'm willing to move on.

2921:. As far as I know, the article has now been fully protected. A 1938: 1468:

In the interest of building consensus, it might be worth filing a

582:

Hi! That page was deleted because it was blatant advertising. :-)

3984:

Prabhaker Nittla Global Account Manager HBL Power Systems Ltd.

3079:

Original poster appears satisfied with explanations and advice.--

1400:

Please add further comments to the Stephanie Adams thread below

2006:

And dismissed at that venue with suggestions to head on over to

1537:

have not triggered a response, nor has the user participated at

1276:? Doesn't the fact that he is afraid to edit make things worse? 1649:, made a factual, documentable, and good-faith edit of article 144: 5360:

Ok fine. Where do you want to talk?. Do you want to email?. --

4094:

WP:Requested articles/Culture and fine arts#Documentary Films

29: 4172:, I do not believe that they belong in the talk space. They 3862:. Also, if you check the history of your talk page, Wikidon 1198:

I am requesting assistance due to recent attacks from editor

1990:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Arcayne

1954:

should just stay away from responding to each others' posts.

1753:

than meaningful content. Not sure what to do about this. --

3565:(featured article review would kill me for that sentence). 655:

The battlin' bible references have moved on, apparently.

4601:

to get you started. Once you have a feel for editing, be

3131:

He is a musician who is nkown for his saxophone playing.

1834:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Doctor Who#Continuity sections

1645:

I would like anyone's help or advice in this matter. I,

236:

Systematic attack on work referring to J. Marvin Herndon

5145: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4161: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3808: 3800: 3792: 3690: 2862: 2859: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1884: 1865: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1224: 1217: 1214: 867: 5261:

still occur. A tag removal warning might be in order.

4696:

for clarification sake could you confirm that you are

957:

If there’s some irregularities from my previous posts

5430:

Hello world, I refer you to my current discussion at

3097:

meet the standards but this time I made sure it did.

1560:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism#Diocese_titles

1539:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism#Diocese_titles

954:

1. Nanami Kamimura 2. Howard the Duck 3. Harlock jds

3326:stretch a "major" competition. I hope this helps. 1653:

on 11 June 2008 which was within an hour deleted by

1493:

User:Malleus Haereticorum and Diocese article naming

4784:and have add a sentence mentioning the name of Dr. 4553:

advice given, and help/advice on users talkpage. --

4152:I ran into what I thought were clear examples of 3751:So I re-added it with the appropriate reference. 2236:Advice given, no further response from editor. -- 951:Assistance to intercede for the following users: 5115:are exactly same. Can someone look into this??? 3866:you of being a sockpuppet of Reyn116. He later 3017:, in that everything we say must be backed by a 444:...for now. Editor is aware of COI guidelines. 2198:Yeah, the Project looks a bit under-staffed. I 1533:guidline. Attempts to contact the user on his 1419:The playmate stats of one particular playmate, 5109:Franklin borough, Cambria County, Pennsylvania 3835:for more info as regards sockpuppets. Cheers, 3803:. Your editing regarding the death section of 3485:Perhaps no one is aware of these discrepancies 3446:article. Same as their article. Perhaps the 2457:Julie Couillard article links to wrong article 2437:Hi, I'll be glad to help. I saw your draft at 5191:Looks like another editor got there first. -- 4378:Knowledge:Talk page guidelines#Central_points 3799:has since withdrawn this allegation per this 3390:Original poster seems happy with response. -- 2803:Kudos. One thread often leads to another. :) 641:Use of blog from recognized authority for BLP 8: 2068:editor directed to relevant Wikiproject and 4776:. On June 9, the user has edited pages for 3989:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Help_desk 3442:has also added non-referenced facts to the 5146:'Inappropriate tone' reported on biography 3407:I've been struggling with an article (see 1362:rather than taking things straight to the 2987:Scott Corsaire (wiki Usr name: bion2u2) 5399:Seeking advice about types of disruption 5038:Hi. A quick question on piped links.... 3477:etc seem to slip under the radar. Even 2031:I'm going to give an outside opinion at 1179:This may yet resurface in other venues 4092:Hello, You could request an article at 3968:Nickel-cadmium battery vented cell type 3429:Comparison_of_web_conferencing_software 1883:On a side note, are users permitted to 1840:. Despite my numerous requests on both 1230:direct me to the proper avenue, thanks! 5113:Franklin, Cambria County, Pennsylvania 968:Hope you can comment on this. Thanks. 720:can I have an answer from someone else 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3855:(ec)Wikidon didn't remove your edit, 3787:accused you of being a sockpuppet of 3727:Editor feels situation is resolved -- 2839:RfC is active on the article's talk. 2129:is transcluded onto 1700+ talkpages, 2033:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Doctor Who 1946:them outside of a terse edit summary. 1885:remove warnings from their talk pages 597:It seems that the article you wrote, 271:http://NuclearPlanet.com/naysayer.htm 7: 5207:Content Dispute or Behaviour Problem 4734:Till waiting for aid on his matter. 4063:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0926200/ 1666:) 06:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Lantana11 410:Special:Contributions/62.189.169.182 302:Knowledge doesn't give out pardons 5238:Would some new eyes have a look at 3589:Knowledge is such a strange beast. 2054:WikiProject Kansas banner templates 1332:I can comment on that last bit... 919:Indiscriminately editing my entries 5060:Knowledge:Proper names#Place names 4791:His name is also mentioned on the 3609:Thanks for the advice. Will do. 2133:appears on another 600 or so, and 28: 5240:The Incredible Hulk (soundtrack)‎ 3200:. If the deleted article lacked 1789:was used; edit wars have ceased. 1740:I think you should be looking at 1565:Knowledge talk:Naming conventions 1507:Discussion moved to better venue 1100:It certainly seems possible that 5404: 5212: 5151: 5083: 5012: 4743: 4636: 4544: 4427: 4128: 4035: 3937: 3718: 3635: 3450:article should just redirect to 3381: 3070: 2950: 2830: 2722:User talk:Samuel Pepus/Archive 1 2639: 2462: 2384: 2316:No comments in the past week. -- 2307: 2227: 2059: 1777: 1618: 1498: 1391: 1354:manner, which we can't tolerate. 1170: 1082:I've been reviewing the article 1054: 924: 790: 646: 528: 435: 293: 241: 115: 33: 5316:the article or somewhere else? 5007:Piped links for other languages 3360:will keep you out of trouble! 1746:WikiProject Television Stations 3465:got hammered really hard, yet 2493:has been linked to this page, 2153:You could post the request at 1744:, as the current situation in 1596:Knowledge talk:Requested moves 1569:Knowledge talk:Requested moves 619:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 430:Teachers Building Society page 1: 3689:It's been restored now (IMO, 3419:Here's my specific complaint. 2861:and replacing it with fluff: 2525:biographies of living persons 799:No further contribs from IP 143:'Harrassment and Stalking' - 4030:An article that needs making 3978:Can this issue be resolved. 1710:; be sure to take a look at 1594:I have started a section in 615:reliable third party sources 609:. This is an encyclopaedia, 5221:No new posts for a week. -- 4991:Thanks for the heads-up! -- 4738:Dealing with Self Promotion 2683:User talk:Samuel Pepys/talk 2135:Template:Wikiproject Kansas 2131:Template:WikiProject Kansas 2104:Template:Wikiproject Kansas 2100:Template:WikiProject Kansas 1830:Talk:Silence in the Library 1364:Administrators' noticeboard 18:Knowledge:Editor assistance 5536: 5402: 5210: 5149: 5081: 5010: 4772:The editor in question is 4741: 4645:No posts since June 18. -- 4634: 4597:for wiki markup, and some 4542: 4436:No posts since June 18. -- 4425: 4126: 4033: 3935: 3932:Batteries used in aircraft 3716: 3633: 3463:User:GaryECampbell/Sandbox 3413:User:GaryECampbell/Sandbox 3379: 3068: 2948: 2828: 2637: 2460: 2382: 2305: 2225: 2057: 1775: 1616: 1496: 1389: 1168: 1052: 922: 788: 644: 526: 523:why was travelonly deleted 433: 291: 239: 113: 5521:02:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 5506:15:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 5491:03:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 5468:12:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 5452:04:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 5425:18:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 5385:15:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 5370:12:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 5356:08:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 5341:16:47, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 5326:11:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 5310:10:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 5289:10:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 5275:20:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 5252:16:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 5233:18:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 5201:20:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 5186:11:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 5170:20:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 5140:04:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 5125:02:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 5102:04:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 5072:12:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 5052:07:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 5033:18:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 5001:19:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4832:18:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4763:17:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 4731:15:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4710:13:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4688:13:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4657:17:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 4622:05:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4580:04:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4565:17:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 4533:14:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4513:10:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 4498:08:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 4479:08:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 4448:17:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 4404:17:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4390:16:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4380:. I think you are wrong. 4356:15:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4318:15:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4293:16:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4270:15:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4238:16:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4219:14:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4199:14:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4147:15:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4110:15:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4100:and write it yourself! -- 4086:06:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4054:20:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 4024:14:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 4007:08:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 3956:14:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 3926:01:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3899:01:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3851:01:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3827:01:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3811:is still in the article. 3777:22:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3739:09:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3707:21:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3684:04:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3668:01:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 3619:06:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3599:06:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3554:06:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3533:01:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3513:01:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3402:11:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3370:22:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3351:20:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3336:20:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3302:19:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3288:19:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3272:18:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3257:18:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3237:13:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3215:02:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3190:01:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3175:00:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3156:00:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3141:23:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3126:23:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3107:23:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3091:11:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3057:17:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 3035:17:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 3007:01:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 2972:20:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 2935:16:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2913:16:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2885:15:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2853:20:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 2808:11:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2783:11:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2755:11:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2734:11:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2712:10:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2695:10:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2672:03:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 2628:00:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2604:18:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2565:16:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2542:06:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2518:05:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2484:20:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 2451:03:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2431:02:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2406:20:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 2374:02:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2359:01:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2344:01:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 2328:20:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 2293:18:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2274:15:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2248:23:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 2212:18:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2186:15:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2167:14:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2147:14:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2116:05:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 2084:23:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 2049:03:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 2026:00:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 2001:21:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1981:21:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1911:21:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1897:21:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1879:21:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1859:21:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1803:20:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 1763:03:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC) 1732:18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1698:18:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1676:06:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 1640:20:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 1608:19:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1589:15:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1553:13:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1527:User:Malleus Haereticorum 1521:18:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1484:12:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1463:12:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1448:03:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1433:01:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 1414:18:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1376:19:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1313:19:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1286:19:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1267:19:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1248:19:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1193:18:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1155:16:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1137:15:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1119:15:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1095:15:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 1077:18:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 1043:16:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 991:14:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 946:18:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 911:19:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 885:19:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 838:19:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 813:18:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 777:19:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 743:19:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 713:17:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 695:16:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 669:18:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 633:21:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 593:21:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 576:21:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 551:18:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 515:13:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 490:13:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 474:11:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 458:18:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 420:20:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 392:19:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 370:12:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 351:09:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 316:18:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 263:17:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 137:17:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 2581:. There is no entry for 1234:This was taken from the 283:21:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 226:09:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 207:06:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 193:22:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 162:21:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 4044:User made a request. -- 3409:User_talk:GaryECampbell 3314:notability requirements 3310:"what Knowledge is not" 3065:My Article was deleted. 2822:Need help with dispute 2336:TimeForYourRealityCheck 2127:Template:Project Kansas 2096:Template:Project Kansas 1455:TimeForYourRealityCheck 4795:article as well as on 4778:International Business 4715:No, I am not George. 2679:User:Samuel Pepys/talk 2155:Knowledge:Bot requests 2070:Knowledge:Bot requests 1935:hello pot, meet kettle 1232: 4986:Suspected Sockpuppets 2634:delete user sub pages 1207: 480:licensing straight. 46:of past discussions. 3783:It appears that the 3542:conflict of interest 3112:It didn't establish 1106:conflict of interest 866:You're referring to 496:conflict of interest 333:phone number removed 5021:Question answered. 4098:register an account 2923:Request for Comment 2917:Please be aware of 2824:Comet (programming) 2577:This comes down to 2222:Picture for Article 1577:request for comment 1470:request for comment 1016:. You can also ask 5160:Tag was removed -- 4817:Can someone help? 4769:in question? etc. 4096:, or, better yet, 3457:In regards to the 2868:BorisFromStockdale 2351:Wandering canadian 2091:WikiProject Kansas 2089:I glanced over at 1864:Said user has now 1772:- disruptive user? 1770:Forest of the Dead 1440:Wandering canadian 1360:dispute resolution 1104:has the risk of a 1030:上村七美 (Nanami-chan) 1004:, they clash with 827:(email removed by 5496:He has indeed. -- 4982:Rajesh K Pillania 4980:I have nominated 4810:) on Knowledge. 4808:Rajesh K Pillania 4786:Rajesh K Pillania 4733: 4721:comment added by 4354: 4268: 4197: 4088: 4076:comment added by 4009: 3997:comment added by 3928: 3912:comment added by 3779: 3763:comment added by 3566: 3009: 2993:comment added by 2540: 2433: 2417:comment added by 2276: 2260:comment added by 2023: 1978: 1708:original research 1655:User: Rollosmokes 1571:(not quite about 1551: 1517: 1513: 1410: 1406: 1272:Also, what about 1189: 1185: 1073: 1069: 1041: 993: 977:comment added by 942: 938: 895:Talk:MeadWestvaco 862: 848:comment added by 841: 809: 805: 745: 729:comment added by 665: 661: 578: 562:comment added by 547: 543: 454: 450: 353: 341:comment added by 312: 308: 259: 255: 133: 129: 107: 106: 58: 57: 52:current main page 5527: 5432:Talk:Sahaja_Yoga 5427: 5422: 5417: 5408: 5407: 5235: 5230: 5225: 5216: 5215: 5172: 5155: 5154: 5104: 5087: 5086: 5035: 5030: 5025: 5016: 5015: 4793:Emerging Markets 4765: 4760: 4755: 4747: 4746: 4716: 4659: 4654: 4649: 4640: 4639: 4619: 4613: 4587:editing tutorial 4567: 4562: 4557: 4548: 4547: 4450: 4445: 4440: 4431: 4430: 4351: 4345: 4340: 4339: 4265: 4259: 4254: 4253: 4194: 4188: 4183: 4182: 4149: 4132: 4131: 4071: 4056: 4039: 4038: 3992: 3987:Retrieved from " 3958: 3941: 3940: 3907: 3894: 3893: 3890: 3887: 3884: 3881: 3848: 3841: 3824: 3817: 3758: 3741: 3736: 3731: 3722: 3721: 3670: 3663: 3662: 3659: 3656: 3653: 3650: 3639: 3638: 3564: 3489:Web Conferencing 3448:web conferencing 3444:Web Conferencing 3425:Web Conferencing 3404: 3399: 3394: 3385: 3384: 3225:reliable sources 3093: 3088: 3083: 3074: 3073: 3045:reliable sources 2988: 2974: 2954: 2953: 2944:Sword of Fargoal 2881: 2875: 2869: 2855: 2834: 2833: 2780: 2775: 2709: 2704: 2674: 2667: 2666: 2663: 2660: 2657: 2654: 2643: 2642: 2539: 2486: 2466: 2465: 2412: 2408: 2388: 2387: 2330: 2325: 2320: 2311: 2310: 2281:Knowledge:Upload 2255: 2250: 2245: 2240: 2231: 2230: 2086: 2081: 2076: 2063: 2062: 2022: 2019: 2016: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1805: 1781: 1780: 1642: 1622: 1621: 1542: 1523: 1518: 1515: 1511: 1502: 1501: 1481: 1476: 1416: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1395: 1394: 1195: 1190: 1187: 1183: 1174: 1173: 1134: 1092: 1079: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1058: 1057: 1033: 972: 948: 943: 940: 936: 928: 927: 861: 842: 826: 815: 810: 807: 803: 794: 793: 724: 671: 666: 663: 659: 650: 649: 630: 625: 590: 588: 557: 553: 548: 545: 541: 532: 531: 512: 507: 501:reliable sources 460: 455: 452: 448: 439: 438: 367: 362: 336: 318: 313: 310: 306: 297: 296: 265: 260: 257: 253: 245: 244: 189: 187: 185: 183: 181: 139: 134: 131: 127: 119: 118: 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 5535: 5534: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5428: 5420: 5415: 5412: 5410: 5405: 5401: 5263:JeremyMcCracken 5236: 5228: 5223: 5220: 5218: 5213: 5209: 5173: 5159: 5157: 5152: 5148: 5105: 5091: 5089: 5084: 5080: 5064:Fuhghettaboutit 5036: 5028: 5023: 5020: 5018: 5013: 5009: 4782:Global Strategy 4766: 4758: 4753: 4751: 4749: 4744: 4740: 4660: 4652: 4647: 4644: 4642: 4637: 4633: 4617: 4611: 4568: 4560: 4555: 4552: 4550: 4545: 4541: 4451: 4443: 4438: 4435: 4433: 4428: 4424: 4421:Tom Angelripper 4349: 4343: 4335: 4263: 4257: 4249: 4192: 4186: 4178: 4150: 4136: 4134: 4129: 4125: 4057: 4043: 4041: 4036: 4032: 3999:220.227.249.226 3959: 3945: 3943: 3938: 3934: 3891: 3888: 3885: 3882: 3879: 3878: 3844: 3837: 3820: 3813: 3742: 3734: 3729: 3726: 3724: 3719: 3715: 3695:JeremyMcCracken 3691:deleting it G11 3671: 3660: 3657: 3654: 3651: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3641: 3636: 3629: 3525:Fuhghettaboutit 3405: 3397: 3392: 3389: 3387: 3382: 3378: 3161:Have a look at 3094: 3086: 3081: 3078: 3076: 3071: 3067: 3019:reliable source 2975: 2960:JeremyMcCracken 2958: 2956: 2951: 2947: 2919:this ANI thread 2879: 2873: 2867: 2856: 2841:JeremyMcCracken 2838: 2836: 2831: 2827: 2778: 2773: 2707: 2702: 2675: 2664: 2661: 2658: 2655: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2645: 2640: 2636: 2592:JeremyMcCracken 2502:Julie Couillard 2491:Julie Couillard 2487: 2472:JeremyMcCracken 2470: 2468: 2463: 2459: 2409: 2394:JeremyMcCracken 2392: 2390: 2385: 2381: 2331: 2323: 2318: 2315: 2313: 2308: 2304: 2300:Stephanie Adams 2251: 2243: 2238: 2235: 2233: 2228: 2224: 2123:some discussion 2087: 2079: 2074: 2067: 2065: 2060: 2056: 2037:JeremyMcCracken 2020: 2012: 1975: 1967: 1939:discussion page 1838:the WikiProject 1806: 1791:JeremyMcCracken 1785: 1783: 1778: 1774: 1720:JeremyMcCracken 1647:User: Lantana11 1643: 1628:JeremyMcCracken 1626: 1624: 1619: 1615: 1581:Fuhghettaboutit 1573:requested moves 1524: 1509: 1506: 1504: 1499: 1495: 1479: 1474: 1421:Stephanie Adams 1417: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1392: 1388: 1323:(edit conflict) 1196: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1171: 1167: 1130: 1088: 1080: 1065: 1062: 1060: 1055: 1051: 949: 934: 932: 930: 925: 921: 899:JeremyMcCracken 873:JeremyMcCracken 843: 816: 801: 798: 796: 791: 787: 672: 657: 654: 652: 647: 643: 628: 623: 611:not a directory 586: 584: 554: 539: 536: 534: 529: 525: 510: 505: 461: 446: 443: 441: 436: 432: 380:JeremyMcCracken 365: 360: 319: 304: 301: 299: 294: 290: 266: 251: 249: 247: 242: 238: 214:JeremyMcCracken 179: 177: 175: 173: 171: 140: 125: 123: 121: 116: 112: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 5533: 5531: 5509: 5508: 5471: 5470: 5403: 5400: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5387: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5211: 5208: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5150: 5147: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5082: 5079: 5078:Article Merger 5076: 5075: 5074: 5011: 5008: 5005: 5004: 5003: 4989: 4978: 4909:Davidfisherman 4867:Intellect12345 4742: 4739: 4736: 4713: 4712: 4635: 4632: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4543: 4540: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4466: 4465: 4462: 4426: 4423: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4222: 4221: 4127: 4124: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4034: 4031: 4028: 4027: 4026: 3936: 3933: 3930: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3829: 3805:Audrey Hepburn 3717: 3714: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3634: 3628: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3557: 3556: 3536: 3535: 3380: 3377: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3343:Paraparanormal 3339: 3338: 3318: 3317: 3294:Paraparanormal 3280:Paraparanormal 3275: 3274: 3249:Paraparanormal 3246:JFJ Foundation 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3218: 3217: 3182:Paraparanormal 3178: 3177: 3148:Paraparanormal 3133:Paraparanormal 3129: 3128: 3099:Paraparanormal 3069: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3038: 3037: 3022: 2949: 2946: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2829: 2826: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2715: 2714: 2638: 2635: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2616:Maxime Bernier 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2545: 2544: 2506:Maxime Bernier 2495:Maxime Bernier 2461: 2458: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2383: 2380: 2377: 2306: 2303: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2226: 2223: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2170: 2169: 2150: 2149: 2058: 2055: 2052: 2029: 2028: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1776: 1773: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1701: 1700: 1686: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1592: 1591: 1497: 1494: 1491: 1489: 1487: 1486: 1425:71.167.236.169 1390: 1387: 1386:Playmate Stats 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1355: 1347: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1300: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1255: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1143:User:Laserhaas 1125:User:LaserHaas 1102:User:LaserHaas 1053: 1050: 1049:Second Opinion 1047: 1046: 1045: 923: 920: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 888: 887: 850:159.124.170.10 825:Molly Wenzler 789: 786: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 761: 753: 747: 746: 699: 645: 642: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 527: 524: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 434: 431: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 397: 396: 395: 394: 373: 372: 343:212.140.250.54 292: 289: 286: 275:Marvin Herndon 240: 237: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 150: 147: 114: 111: 108: 105: 104: 99: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5532: 5523: 5522: 5518: 5514: 5507: 5503: 5499: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5488: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5469: 5465: 5461: 5458:diagnosing.-- 5456: 5455: 5454: 5453: 5449: 5445: 5441: 5437: 5433: 5426: 5423: 5418: 5398: 5386: 5382: 5378: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5367: 5363: 5359: 5358: 5357: 5353: 5349: 5344: 5343: 5342: 5338: 5334: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5323: 5319: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5311: 5307: 5303: 5299: 5290: 5286: 5282: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5272: 5268: 5264: 5260: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5249: 5245: 5241: 5234: 5231: 5226: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5183: 5179: 5171: 5167: 5163: 5141: 5137: 5133: 5129: 5128: 5127: 5126: 5122: 5118: 5114: 5110: 5107:Please merge 5103: 5099: 5095: 5077: 5073: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5053: 5049: 5045: 5039: 5034: 5031: 5026: 5006: 5002: 4998: 4994: 4990: 4987: 4983: 4979: 4976: 4973: 4970: 4966: 4962: 4959: 4956: 4952: 4948: 4945: 4942: 4938: 4934: 4931: 4928: 4924: 4920: 4917: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4903: 4900: 4896: 4895:FreeSpirit111 4892: 4889: 4886: 4882: 4878: 4875: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4861: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4847: 4844: 4840: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4829: 4825: 4821: 4818: 4815: 4811: 4809: 4804: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4789: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4775: 4770: 4764: 4761: 4756: 4737: 4735: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4723:129.85.55.205 4720: 4711: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4695: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4685: 4681: 4680:129.85.55.205 4677: 4674: 4671: 4667: 4663: 4658: 4655: 4650: 4630: 4627: 4623: 4620: 4614: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4577: 4573: 4566: 4563: 4558: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4526: 4523:, I think. -- 4522: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4510: 4506: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4481: 4480: 4476: 4472: 4463: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4454: 4449: 4446: 4441: 4422: 4419: 4405: 4401: 4397: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4357: 4352: 4346: 4338: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4294: 4290: 4286: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4271: 4266: 4260: 4252: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4200: 4195: 4189: 4181: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4155: 4148: 4144: 4140: 4122: 4118: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4095: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4078:75.20.182.142 4075: 4068: 4065: 4064: 4060: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3990: 3985: 3982: 3979: 3976: 3973: 3970: 3969: 3965: 3962: 3961:Sir or madam 3957: 3953: 3949: 3931: 3929: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3900: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3858: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3849: 3847: 3842: 3840: 3834: 3830: 3828: 3825: 3823: 3818: 3816: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3755: 3752: 3749: 3745: 3740: 3737: 3732: 3712: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3669: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3632: 3626: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3611:GaryECampbell 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3579: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3546:GaryECampbell 3543: 3538: 3537: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3521:WP:OTHERSTUFF 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3505:GaryECampbell 3502: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3480: 3479:Adobe Connect 3476: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3455: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3421: 3420: 3416: 3414: 3410: 3403: 3400: 3395: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3324: 3320: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3290: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3247: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3203: 3199: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3143: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3116:- who is he? 3115: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3092: 3089: 3084: 3064: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3023: 3020: 3016: 3015:verifiability 3012: 3011: 3010: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2985: 2982: 2979: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2945: 2942: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2883: 2882: 2880:Contributions 2876: 2870: 2863: 2860: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2825: 2821: 2809: 2806: 2805:Baseball Bugs 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2784: 2781: 2776: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2756: 2753: 2752:Baseball Bugs 2749: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2705: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2673: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2538: 2537:Seraphimblade 2534: 2531: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2498: 2496: 2492: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2439:User:Mikusart 2436: 2435: 2434: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2378: 2376: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2361: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2346: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2329: 2326: 2321: 2301: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2262:Careygroberts 2259: 2249: 2246: 2241: 2221: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2092: 2085: 2082: 2077: 2071: 2053: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2027: 2024: 2017: 2015: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1991: 1982: 1979: 1972: 1970: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1945: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1771: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1755:66.102.80.212 1752: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1612: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1522: 1519: 1492: 1490: 1485: 1482: 1477: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1435: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1415: 1412: 1385: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1353: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274:User:Radiolbx 1270: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1231: 1227: 1225: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1194: 1191: 1164: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1085: 1078: 1075: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1031: 1028:for more.) - 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 996: 995: 994: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 969: 966: 964: 960: 955: 952: 947: 944: 918: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 893:According to 892: 891: 890: 889: 886: 882: 878: 874: 869: 865: 864: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 839: 836: 833: 830: 823: 820: 814: 811: 784: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 759: 754: 751: 750: 749: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 721: 717: 716: 715: 714: 710: 706: 701: 697: 696: 692: 688: 683: 679: 675: 674:2 Questions: 670: 667: 640: 634: 631: 626: 620: 616: 612: 608: 607:verifiability 604: 600: 596: 595: 594: 591: 589: 581: 580: 579: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 552: 549: 522: 516: 513: 508: 502: 497: 493: 492: 491: 487: 483: 478: 477: 476: 475: 471: 467: 459: 456: 429: 421: 418: 415: 411: 407: 406:Barclays Bank 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 376: 375: 374: 371: 368: 363: 356: 355: 354: 352: 348: 344: 340: 335: 334: 329: 326: 323: 317: 314: 287: 285: 284: 280: 276: 272: 264: 261: 235: 227: 223: 219: 215: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 196: 195: 194: 191: 190: 166: 165: 164: 163: 159: 155: 145: 138: 135: 110:User:Chafford 109: 103: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 5510: 5472: 5429: 5295: 5258: 5237: 5174: 5117:4.240.165.59 5106: 5044:CultureDrone 5040: 5037: 4971: 4957: 4943: 4929: 4923:Globalacumen 4915: 4901: 4887: 4873: 4859: 4845: 4839:Greatlife999 4822: 4819: 4816: 4812: 4805: 4797:List of Jats 4790: 4771: 4767: 4714: 4693: 4678: 4675: 4672: 4668: 4664: 4661: 4593:. Here is a 4569: 4505:CultureDrone 4502: 4490:CultureDrone 4485: 4483: 4482: 4471:CultureDrone 4469:Cheers. :-) 4467: 4455: 4452: 4151: 4069: 4066: 4061: 4058: 3986: 3983: 3980: 3977: 3974: 3971: 3966: 3963: 3960: 3905: 3876: 3875: 3857:Antique Rose 3845: 3838: 3821: 3814: 3789:User:Reyn116 3756: 3753: 3750: 3746: 3743: 3672: 3645: 3644: 3630: 3484: 3483: 3456: 3438: 3422: 3418: 3417: 3406: 3340: 3291: 3276: 3243: 3179: 3144: 3130: 3095: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2976: 2896: 2865: 2857: 2687:Samuel Pepys 2676: 2649: 2648: 2583:Bernard Cote 2553:Hells Angels 2529: 2499: 2488: 2410: 2366:66.108.3.221 2362: 2347: 2332: 2252: 2199: 2088: 2030: 2013: 1987: 1968: 1958: 1943: 1918: 1807: 1644: 1593: 1572: 1525: 1488: 1451: 1436: 1418: 1340: 1322: 1321: 1233: 1228: 1221: 1208: 1204: 1197: 1131: 1089: 1081: 997: 970: 967: 956: 953: 950: 824: 821: 817: 719: 702: 698: 684: 680: 676: 673: 587:Stwalkerster 583: 555: 462: 332: 330: 327: 324: 320: 267: 170: 141: 82: 47: 41: 5479:tendentious 5436:tendentious 5193:AndrewHowse 5162:AndrewHowse 5132:AndrewHowse 5094:AndrewHowse 4965:Worldstorey 4881:Globallight 4774:Worldstorey 4717:—Preceding 4539:Help needed 4525:AndrewHowse 4521:User:Scaion 4486:Ignore this 4396:AndrewHowse 4310:AndrewHowse 4211:AndrewHowse 4160:violations 4139:AndrewHowse 4102:AndrewHowse 4072:—Preceding 4046:AndrewHowse 4016:AndrewHowse 3993:—Preceding 3981:Thank you, 3948:AndrewHowse 3908:—Preceding 3839:Nk.sheridan 3831:Please see 3815:Nk.sheridan 3759:—Preceding 3627:Joel Widzer 3578:tendentious 3493:PictureTalk 3467:PictureTalk 3459:PictureTalk 3452:PictureTalk 3440:PictureTalk 3433:PictureTalk 3356:Best not. 2989:—Preceding 2984:Thank You, 2726:Pastordavid 2443:AndrewHowse 2413:—Preceding 2379:Artist bio. 2285:AndrewHowse 2256:—Preceding 2204:AndrewHowse 2159:AndrewHowse 2139:AndrewHowse 1903:MilborneOne 1824:, the user 1818:three times 1751:revert wars 1690:AndrewHowse 1579:. Cheers.-- 1305:AndrewHowse 1259:AndrewHowse 1211:User:JPG-GR 1200:User:JPG-GR 1165:User:JPG-GR 1111:AndrewHowse 1002:Idol series 973:—Preceding 963:Idol Series 844:—Preceding 725:—Preceding 718:Great, now 558:—Preceding 337:—Preceding 40:This is an 5475:disruptive 5377:Jasynnash2 5348:Jasynnash2 5318:Jasynnash2 5244:Jasynnash2 5178:Poppismith 4951:123bluesky 4853:Davidman21 4702:Jasynnash2 4612:Boccobrock 4595:cheatsheet 4070:Thanks!! 3713:Sockpuppet 3631:Apparently 3114:notability 2874:Discussion 2835:Unresolved 2579:notability 2178:Millbrooky 2108:Millbrooky 1965:issue. - 1822:four times 1545:MrDolomite 1132:Silverhand 1090:Silverhand 971:Webwires 959:Pinoy Idol 731:Romans9:11 687:Romans9:11 603:notability 599:Travelonly 466:Teachersbs 358:account.-- 102:Archive 30 94:Archive 27 89:Archive 26 83:Archive 25 77:Archive 24 72:Archive 23 64:Archive 20 5498:Simon D M 5460:Simon D M 5362:SkyWalker 5333:SkyWalker 5302:SkyWalker 4937:Globaljoy 4607:talk page 4572:Catagraph 4174:responded 3868:rescinded 3807:per this 3795:The user 3791:per this 3591:Xavexgoem 3501:WebHuddle 3475:WebHuddle 3118:Xavexgoem 2892:talk page 2774:Seraphim♥ 2703:Seraphim♥ 2587:this link 2528:involved 2508:article. 2504:from the 1988:Moved to 1963:ownership 1950:occasion. 1942:actually 1668:Lantana11 1660:Lantana11 1613:"KCBS-TV" 1535:talk page 1084:EToys.com 1022:WP:ATTACK 758:Wikiality 682:arguing. 414:Fayenatic 5513:Freelion 5483:Freelion 5444:Freelion 5271:contribs 5156:Resolved 5088:Resolved 5017:Resolved 4993:Jaysweet 4975:contribs 4961:contribs 4947:contribs 4933:contribs 4919:contribs 4905:contribs 4891:contribs 4877:contribs 4863:contribs 4849:contribs 4820:Thanks, 4801:Strategy 4748:Resolved 4719:unsigned 4694:Question 4549:Resolved 4133:Resolved 4123:concerns 4074:unsigned 4040:Resolved 3995:unsigned 3942:Resolved 3922:contribs 3914:Mcatch23 3910:unsigned 3773:contribs 3765:Mcatch23 3761:unsigned 3723:Resolved 3703:contribs 3640:Resolved 3386:Resolved 3362:JohnInDC 3328:JohnInDC 3323:WP:MUSIC 3312:and the 3264:JohnInDC 3229:Jaysweet 3207:JohnInDC 3202:reliable 3198:WP:Music 3167:JohnInDC 3163:WP:MUSIC 3075:Resolved 3049:Jaysweet 3027:Jaysweet 3003:contribs 2991:unsigned 2968:contribs 2955:Resolved 2927:Jaysweet 2909:contribs 2849:contribs 2644:Resolved 2600:contribs 2480:contribs 2427:contribs 2419:Mikusart 2415:unsigned 2402:contribs 2270:contribs 2258:unsigned 2064:Resolved 2045:contribs 1799:contribs 1782:Resolved 1728:contribs 1636:contribs 1600:Lyricmac 1567:, maybe 1512:HEFFIELD 1503:Resolved 1405:HEFFIELD 1368:Jaysweet 1344:contribs 1334:Radiolbx 1278:Milonica 1240:Milonica 1184:HEFFIELD 1147:JohnInDC 1068:HEFFIELD 1059:Resolved 1039:contribs 1035:talkback 1026:WP:POINT 998:Comment: 987:contribs 979:Webwires 975:unsigned 937:HEFFIELD 907:contribs 881:contribs 858:contribs 846:unsigned 804:HEFFIELD 769:Jaysweet 739:contribs 727:unsigned 705:Johnb316 660:HEFFIELD 572:contribs 564:Gluciani 560:unsigned 542:HEFFIELD 482:JohnInDC 449:HEFFIELD 440:Resolved 388:contribs 339:unsigned 325:Regards 307:HEFFIELD 254:HEFFIELD 222:contribs 199:Chafford 154:Chafford 128:HEFFIELD 22:Requests 20:‎ | 5511:Touché 5440:disrupt 5416:Beloved 5224:Beloved 5024:Beloved 4754:Beloved 4676:Thanks 4648:Beloved 4591:sandbox 4556:Beloved 4439:Beloved 4382:EdQuine 4285:EdQuine 4230:EdQuine 4158:WP:TALK 4154:WP:SPAM 4121:WP:TALK 4117:WP:SPAM 3872:removed 3864:accused 3833:WP:SOCK 3797:WikiDon 3785:WikiDon 3730:Beloved 3393:Beloved 3358:WP:COPY 3082:Beloved 2995:Bion2u2 2620:DSatYVR 2557:DSatYVR 2533:notable 2510:DSatYVR 2319:Beloved 2302:Article 2239:Beloved 2075:Beloved 2014:Arcayne 1969:Arcayne 1944:discuss 1866:removed 1826:Arcayne 1683:KCBS-TV 1651:KCBS-TV 1531:WP:NAME 1475:Beloved 1352:incivil 1236:admin's 1018:WP:RS/N 624:Beloved 506:Beloved 361:Beloved 328:R. S. 43:archive 5259:should 4963:) and 4824:Tkiyak 4698:George 3676:reagan 3497:Glance 3471:Glance 3146:back? 2748:WP:ANI 2681:& 1816:, not 1812:, not 1742:WP:OWN 1014:WP:SPS 1006:WP:NFC 829:Onorem 417:(talk) 5421:Freak 5409:Stale 5281:Kevin 5229:Freak 5217:Stale 5176:help. 5029:Freak 4759:Freak 4653:Freak 4641:Stale 4629:Copts 4599:links 4561:Freak 4444:Freak 4432:Stale 4344:habla 4337:María 4258:habla 4251:María 4207:WP:OR 4187:habla 4180:María 3874:it. 3735:Freak 3398:Freak 3087:Freak 2779:Whipp 2708:Whipp 2467:Stale 2389:Stale 2324:Freak 2312:Stale 2244:Freak 2232:Stale 2080:Freak 2008:WP:3O 1993:U-Mos 1889:U-Mos 1871:U-Mos 1851:U-Mos 1814:twice 1716:WP:RS 1623:Stale 1480:Freak 1396:Stale 1299:help. 1175:Stale 929:Stale 795:Stale 785:Issue 651:Stale 629:Freak 533:Stale 511:Freak 366:Freak 298:Stale 246:Stale 120:Stale 16:< 5517:talk 5502:talk 5487:talk 5473:The 5464:talk 5448:talk 5381:talk 5366:talk 5352:talk 5337:talk 5322:talk 5306:talk 5298:this 5285:talk 5267:talk 5248:talk 5197:talk 5182:talk 5166:talk 5136:talk 5121:talk 5111:and 5098:talk 5068:talk 5048:talk 4997:talk 4969:talk 4955:talk 4941:talk 4927:talk 4913:talk 4899:talk 4885:talk 4871:talk 4857:talk 4843:talk 4828:talk 4799:and 4780:and 4727:talk 4706:talk 4684:talk 4662:Hi, 4603:bold 4576:talk 4529:talk 4509:talk 4494:talk 4475:talk 4400:talk 4386:talk 4350:migo 4314:talk 4289:talk 4264:migo 4234:talk 4215:talk 4209:. -- 4193:migo 4170:here 4166:here 4164:and 4162:here 4156:and 4143:talk 4119:and 4106:talk 4082:talk 4050:talk 4020:talk 4003:talk 3952:talk 3918:talk 3846:Talk 3822:Talk 3809:diff 3801:diff 3793:diff 3769:talk 3744:Hi, 3699:talk 3680:talk 3615:talk 3595:talk 3550:talk 3529:talk 3509:talk 3423:The 3411:and 3366:talk 3347:talk 3332:talk 3298:talk 3284:talk 3268:talk 3253:talk 3233:talk 3211:talk 3186:talk 3171:talk 3152:talk 3137:talk 3122:talk 3103:talk 3053:talk 3047:. -- 3031:talk 2999:talk 2964:talk 2931:talk 2905:talk 2901:user 2845:talk 2730:talk 2691:talk 2624:talk 2596:talk 2561:talk 2514:talk 2476:talk 2447:talk 2423:talk 2398:talk 2370:talk 2355:talk 2340:talk 2289:talk 2266:talk 2208:talk 2182:talk 2163:talk 2143:talk 2112:talk 2098:and 2072:. -- 2041:talk 2010:. - 1997:talk 1907:talk 1893:talk 1875:talk 1855:talk 1844:and 1820:but 1810:once 1808:Not 1795:talk 1759:talk 1724:talk 1714:and 1712:WP:V 1694:talk 1672:talk 1664:talk 1632:talk 1604:talk 1585:talk 1549:Talk 1516:TEEL 1472:. -- 1459:talk 1444:talk 1429:talk 1409:TEEL 1372:talk 1338:talk 1309:talk 1282:talk 1263:talk 1244:talk 1188:TEEL 1151:talk 1115:talk 1072:TEEL 1024:and 1012:and 1010:WP:V 983:talk 941:TEEL 903:talk 877:talk 868:this 854:talk 808:TEEL 773:talk 767:. -- 765:here 735:talk 709:talk 691:talk 664:TEEL 605:and 568:talk 546:TEEL 494:The 486:talk 470:talk 453:TEEL 384:talk 347:talk 311:TEEL 279:talk 258:TEEL 218:talk 203:talk 158:talk 132:TEEL 5269:) ( 4949:), 4935:), 4921:), 4907:), 4893:), 4879:), 4865:), 4851:), 4347:con 4261:con 4190:con 3991:" 3860:did 3701:) ( 2966:) ( 2847:) ( 2598:) ( 2478:) ( 2400:) ( 2200:was 2043:) ( 1842:his 1797:) ( 1726:) ( 1634:) ( 1202:. 905:) ( 879:) ( 835:Dil 408:), 386:) ( 220:) ( 146:). 5519:) 5504:) 5489:) 5477:, 5466:) 5450:) 5413:-- 5411:– 5383:) 5368:) 5354:) 5339:) 5331:-- 5324:) 5308:) 5287:) 5273:) 5250:) 5219:– 5199:) 5184:) 5168:) 5158:– 5138:) 5123:) 5100:) 5092:-- 5090:– 5070:) 5050:) 5019:– 4999:) 4977:). 4830:) 4750:– 4729:) 4708:) 4686:) 4643:– 4609:. 4578:) 4551:– 4531:) 4511:) 4496:) 4477:) 4434:– 4402:) 4388:) 4316:) 4308:-- 4291:) 4236:) 4217:) 4145:) 4137:-- 4135:– 4108:) 4084:) 4052:) 4042:– 4022:) 4014:-- 4005:) 3954:) 3946:-- 3944:– 3924:) 3920:• 3892:me 3889:la 3886:tf 3883:ee 3880:Fl 3775:) 3771:• 3725:– 3705:) 3682:) 3661:me 3658:la 3655:tf 3652:ee 3649:Fl 3642:– 3617:) 3597:) 3552:) 3531:) 3511:) 3499:, 3495:, 3491:, 3473:, 3469:, 3388:– 3368:) 3349:) 3334:) 3300:) 3286:) 3270:) 3255:) 3235:) 3213:) 3188:) 3173:) 3154:) 3139:) 3124:) 3105:) 3077:– 3055:) 3033:) 3025:-- 3005:) 3001:• 2970:) 2957:– 2933:) 2911:) 2907:• 2903:• 2897:~a 2851:) 2837:– 2732:) 2724:. 2693:) 2685:-- 2665:me 2662:la 2659:tf 2656:ee 2653:Fl 2646:– 2626:) 2602:) 2563:) 2530:is 2516:) 2497:. 2482:) 2469:– 2449:) 2429:) 2425:• 2404:) 2391:– 2372:) 2357:) 2342:) 2314:– 2291:) 2272:) 2268:• 2234:– 2210:) 2184:) 2176:-- 2165:) 2145:) 2114:) 2066:– 2047:) 2035:. 2021:() 1999:) 1976:() 1959:ec 1929:, 1925:, 1919:ec 1909:) 1895:) 1887:? 1877:) 1857:) 1846:my 1801:) 1787:3O 1784:– 1761:) 1730:) 1718:. 1696:) 1674:) 1638:) 1625:– 1606:) 1587:) 1547:• 1543:— 1505:– 1461:) 1446:) 1431:) 1398:– 1374:) 1311:) 1284:) 1265:) 1246:) 1219:. 1177:– 1153:) 1128:-- 1117:) 1109:-- 1061:– 1037:| 1032:| 989:) 985:• 961:, 931:– 909:) 883:) 860:) 856:• 797:– 775:) 741:) 737:• 711:) 693:) 653:– 574:) 570:• 535:– 488:) 472:) 442:– 390:) 349:) 300:– 281:) 248:– 224:) 205:) 188:te 186:ai 184:hw 182:et 180:tl 178:os 174:an 172:Ry 160:) 122:– 98:→ 68:← 5515:( 5500:( 5485:( 5462:( 5446:( 5379:( 5364:( 5350:( 5335:( 5320:( 5304:( 5283:( 5265:( 5246:( 5195:( 5180:( 5164:( 5134:( 5119:( 5096:( 5066:( 5046:( 4995:( 4988:. 4972:· 4967:( 4958:· 4953:( 4944:· 4939:( 4930:· 4925:( 4916:· 4911:( 4902:· 4897:( 4888:· 4883:( 4874:· 4869:( 4860:· 4855:( 4846:· 4841:( 4826:( 4725:( 4704:( 4682:( 4618:T 4615:• 4574:( 4527:( 4507:( 4492:( 4484:: 4473:( 4398:( 4384:( 4353:) 4341:( 4312:( 4287:( 4267:) 4255:( 4232:( 4213:( 4196:) 4184:( 4141:( 4104:( 4080:( 4048:( 4018:( 4001:( 3950:( 3916:( 3767:( 3697:( 3678:( 3613:( 3593:( 3548:( 3527:( 3507:( 3364:( 3345:( 3330:( 3296:( 3282:( 3266:( 3251:( 3231:( 3209:( 3184:( 3169:( 3150:( 3135:( 3120:( 3101:( 3051:( 3029:( 2997:( 2962:( 2929:( 2899:( 2877:| 2871:| 2843:( 2728:( 2689:( 2622:( 2594:( 2559:( 2512:( 2474:( 2445:( 2421:( 2396:( 2368:( 2353:( 2338:( 2287:( 2264:( 2206:( 2180:( 2161:( 2141:( 2110:( 2039:( 1995:( 1957:( 1931:3 1927:2 1923:1 1917:( 1905:( 1891:( 1873:( 1853:( 1793:( 1757:( 1722:( 1692:( 1670:( 1662:( 1630:( 1602:( 1583:( 1541:. 1514:S 1510:S 1457:( 1442:( 1427:( 1407:S 1403:S 1370:( 1341:· 1336:( 1307:( 1280:( 1261:( 1242:( 1186:S 1182:S 1149:( 1113:( 1070:S 1066:S 981:( 939:S 935:S 901:( 875:( 852:( 840:) 832:♠ 806:S 802:S 771:( 733:( 707:( 689:( 662:S 658:S 566:( 544:S 540:S 484:( 468:( 451:S 447:S 382:( 345:( 309:S 305:S 277:( 256:S 252:S 216:( 201:( 176:P 156:( 130:S 126:S 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 25 - Knowledge

Index