177:
checked in the other references the article provides. However, adding wild, potentially controversial statements to an article DO require extensive referencing in reliable sources. If I edit the article on George
Washington, and claim he was a pedophile and kept a harem of small boys at Mount Vernon, I had better be able to back such a claim up with reliable sources. Even more important is correct citation of criticism. It should be clear that critical statements about a subject should be referenced to the work and author where the critical statement was made. If people feel that George Washington was hypocritical for fighting for freedom AND owning slaves, then such criticism needs to be attributed to reliable sources. Simply making such a statement is either
261:
All text created at
Knowledge (XXG) should be the product of the mind of its editors. If you read something, thought about it, and put it into your own words from scratch, it is not a copyright violation (it may still be plagiarism. See below). If however, you have cut-and-pasted, or read and retyped word-for-word, from another source, even if you do extensive copyediting to "cover your tracks" it is still academic dishonesty, and still a copyright violation.
321:. Academic institutions such as colleges and universities consider plagiarism as the highest form of academic dishonesty, and often reserve its most serious penalties for serious plagiarism. The basic principle is: You must NOT present the ideas of another as your own. Since Knowledge (XXG) does NOT publish original thought, all ideas here originate with authors outside of Knowledge (XXG). Thus, we need to credit those that we get ideas from.
190:
a new user who is unaware of how to edit correctly. If experienced editors don't help editors having problems, then they will never get better. If an editor is uninterested in becoming a better editor, and is making their edits in blatant disregard of established policy, or of general understanding of academic honesty, then that editor should be dealt with.
168:. Does the user show a proclivity towards adding unsourced information to articles or claiming information as their own? Does the user make repeated copyvios? Most importantly, have other experienced editors and admins tried to educate the user on Knowledge (XXG)'s policies regarding proper referencing and of the problems or plagiarism?
24:
344:
Some facts, however, are verifiable but inherently difficult to access. An editor may use a standard format citation to a public archive for a land sale that occurred in 1910. Such hard-to-verify citations should be avoided when reliable alternatives are available: references to
Shakespeare's plays
336:
Any editor who attempts to reference a passage is responsible for creating citations in standard format including specifics such as page numbers. An editor who merely names an author or a book has not created a reference because readers cannot be expected to search through hundreds of pages for some
260:
As with any other principle, an obvious attempt to evade a law is evidence of personal awareness of wrongdoing. Patently obvious attempts at evading copyright law, such as changing random words to synonyms, reformatting text, moving sentence order, etc. are still violations of the most serious kind.
189:
Editors that have been made aware that their edits are frequently controversial and unreferenced should be given a chance to improve as editors. If an editor has acknowledged the criticism against them and either disregards it or openly dismisses it, such behavior should be seen as more serious than
122:
However, we should not forget that the entire world of academia is NOT run on this system. People who publish works outside of
Knowledge (XXG) expect to be credited for the work they do, and rightly so. It is their right to be credited for the work they do; and it is our duty to do so. We must not
118:
Knowledge (XXG) is covered under the GFDL; all work is licensed for redistribution. By editing articles, Wikipedians enter into a tacit agreement that their work is open for editing and redistribution by others under a different standard of copyright protection than is usually found in print media.
382:
A history article uses several citations to an online translation of a source. An editor wants to cite a different translation from another website. It is not good enough to just cut and paste the new URL into one of the footnotes. The editor who makes this change also needs to update the name of
365:
Before adding additional references to a well-cited article, check the existing citations to make certain the addition does not duplicate a citation that has already been made. New citations normally follow whatever citation format the article already uses. If a changeover to some different format
251:
Short (sentence or paragraph length) quotations are not necessarily copyright violations, especially when they do not represent a significant portion of the work. It may still be copyright violation if the text is not properly attributed to its original source, but one should not be concerned about
176:
Adding a missing birth date to an article about a long dead historical figure and not referencing the addition is not really plagiarism. It is a trivial fact, it can be found in MANY resources, and it is not likely to generate controversy. If the article is already well referenced, the fact can be
233:
if copied material represents a substantial portion of what you are creating, then a violation has occurred. The law in most cases leaves this intentionally vague, and we should too. The principle that should be followed here is: Is the new work recognizable as a completely independently created
289:
Ideally, every idea contained in every
Knowledge (XXG) article should be traceable back to the originator of that idea through the use of each works sources. That does NOT mean that you should cite the sources of a source. If you have a book open, and are using it to help develop an article, you
147:
If a new user adds unsourced statements, depending on the severity of the mistake, a {{fact}} tag can be added, the unsourced information can be removed, or best of all, an experienced editor can fix the mistake. In all cases, the mistake should be corrected, and such corrections should be noted
361:
Care should be exercised when editing article passages that are already referenced with line citations. Hasty or poorly planned edits can turn an appropriate citation into a bad one. Review the source material before making an alteration that could substantially alter the accuracy of the cited
155:
be familiar enough with proper referencing, and should be held to a higher standard. Still, a single mistake by an experienced user should not justify accusations of academic dishonesty. But when considering whether or not to raise questions of an editor's motives and honesty, their experience
143:
As noted above, we should assume good faith in the actions of all editors, especially new editors. One could not expect a High School freshman to understand the intricacies of the MLA format for Works Cited Pages, on the other hand, a post-graduate student should understand how to properly cite
332:
An editor who creates the first line citations to a previously unreferenced article may select any standard citation format such as
Harvard referencing or Chicago Manual of Style. Subsequent editors should add new citations in whatever format is already in use. If a change in the format seems
198:
When confronted with blatant evidence of dishonesty, and assuming that ample warnings have gone unheeded for considerable time, the user should be blocked or banned. Dishonesty cannot rightly be called vandalism; it is not an attempt to disrupt the editorial process. Still, repeated dishonest
383:
the translator, the site access date, and any page number in the footnote. Update relevant article text, especially direct quotations because different translators use different wording. Make corresponding changes to other footnotes so that the entire article cites the same translation.
2848:
888:
394:
Articles should present divergent opinions fairly and devote proportionate space based on each viewpoint's relative acceptance among notable experts and based on the dispute's relative importance to the overall article topic. The article text must refrain from commenting
215:
Copyright is the legal protection afforded to the creator of a work or their designees with regard to the right to reproduce that work. Laws vary between various jurisdictions, and since
Knowledge (XXG) is an international venture, it is perhaps impossible to devise a
2049:
303:
to find that biography's sources, and then find that source's source, and so on, you should eventually arrive back at a primary source, such as a birth certificate. But you should not do that. You should cite the source YOU used to find the information.
423:
or the proper use of sources to alter the citation so that Helen Keller appears to be neutral about socialism. She was an outspoken socialist. Likewise, it would not be neutral to quote her opinion of socialism and add your own editorial comment,
1453:
312:
Because plagiarism is harder to nail-down as a concept than copyright violation, many people think that it is a less serious violation. Indeed, while copyright violation has real civil and criminal legal penalties attached to it, there is no such
110:, and many are unaware of Knowledge (XXG)'s standards. For any obviously new editor, we should educate, not correct; help, not punish. However, when a user displays obvious academic dishonesty, it should be dealt with swiftly and decisively.
918:
2735:
2184:
348:
When an article makes multiple references to the same source, the same edition of the source is normally preferred for all citations. An exception to this would be an article whose purpose is to document such differences, such as
242:
The copyright holder of a work has certain rights to prohibit others from republishing it. For example, if an article at
Knowledge (XXG) is copied from Encyclopædia Britannica, this is a violation of the Britannica's copyright.
298:
You wish to add a birth date to an article about a notable person. You do not need to (and in fact should not) cite the actual birth certificate. You should cite a reliable biography that you are actually looking at. If you
2615:
1787:
290:
should cite THAT SOURCE. This is because each author, while relying on the work of others, still adds a unique perspective on their work. Give credit where credit is due even if the source is not covered by copyright law.
2144:
1953:
1548:
2988:
1255:
2928:
2675:
2296:
933:
2998:
435:
What would be NPOV is to present her viewpoint accurately. If commentary is desirable, cite notable supporters and detractors in appropriate proportion on the specific topic of Helen Keller's socialist beliefs.
2740:
600:
3264:
3259:
2550:
337:
specific passage the editor had in mind; likewise, a URL link that merely goes to the home page of a large website does not constitute a citation. Removal of such material does not constitute violation of
228:
A copyright violation exists if the copied text represents a substantial portion of either the original work or the derivative work. That means that if you have copied a substantial portion of something,
3053:
1353:
3038:
2788:
1328:
1383:
1080:
3058:
2465:
1651:
1105:
1028:
610:
1230:
660:
650:
2505:
2485:
1448:
1418:
730:
1742:
1468:
745:
685:
818:
234:
work? If it is patently obvious that the new work contains a substantial portion of its text from another work, regardless of the percent of text copied, then a violation has occurred.
3203:
1150:
2510:
2590:
2545:
2455:
2405:
1671:
1398:
1373:
3312:
3098:
1388:
1023:
1008:
720:
2425:
988:
2580:
2495:
1611:
1463:
1368:
983:
943:
798:
3208:
2301:
2214:
1812:
1553:
1378:
1303:
1038:
1013:
938:
550:
509:
2189:
2134:
2119:
2635:
2585:
2440:
1732:
1070:
953:
833:
1872:
1250:
3168:
1797:
1543:
1280:
1205:
775:
1852:
3063:
2715:
2560:
2480:
2149:
1898:
1827:
1681:
978:
3108:
2665:
1363:
1240:
1130:
1033:
1018:
1245:
620:
2650:
2620:
2430:
2179:
2174:
1711:
1160:
1115:
1045:
3188:
1867:
220:
policy that will fit all of the world. Still, certain principles of copyright apply across nearly all jurisdictions, and should hold true in any circumstance:
2963:
1408:
783:
497:
399:
on the relative merits of different cited opinions, however, each citation of a notable viewpoint should be an accurate representation of the subject's views.
181:(if it is ONLY the thought of the editor making the edit) or is Plagiarism (if the criticism is taken from an outside source, that source should be credited).
3048:
765:
2918:
2793:
813:
2680:
2395:
1792:
1478:
1260:
1090:
1003:
605:
1538:
755:
3269:
2570:
2530:
2244:
1857:
1777:
1293:
1195:
1125:
913:
374:
When editing footnotes, update the associated text as appropriate to ensure that the entire citation remains accurate and the article remains consistent.
3158:
2730:
1913:
2410:
1847:
1593:
1085:
625:
277:. The prose itself should be the creation of the editors (if it is not, it may be copyright violation, see above), but the ideas should all appear in
2209:
2154:
2124:
595:
2878:
2798:
1661:
3193:
3163:
2953:
2933:
2490:
2159:
2114:
2109:
1918:
1802:
1706:
1443:
1155:
1100:
1055:
993:
963:
868:
858:
630:
2973:
2475:
1075:
760:
3128:
3003:
2853:
2575:
2271:
2079:
1958:
1807:
1403:
1225:
1175:
715:
3143:
3083:
3008:
2500:
2470:
2390:
2219:
1190:
1180:
1145:
958:
863:
585:
3183:
199:
behavior that meets all of the criteria above needs to be dealt with decisively. Depending on the nature of the dishonesty, everything from
3153:
3018:
2993:
2873:
2645:
2104:
2013:
1973:
1877:
1533:
1518:
1393:
998:
848:
803:
735:
695:
545:
39:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3295:
3123:
3103:
3028:
3023:
2595:
2084:
1727:
1636:
1498:
1433:
1343:
1333:
1308:
1270:
1265:
1200:
968:
928:
873:
465:
40:
1581:
2199:
1862:
1691:
273:. What this means is that Knowledge (XXG) is written from the writings of other people who themselves did original research. As such,
3317:
2720:
2008:
1993:
1908:
1483:
828:
575:
570:
3113:
2923:
2893:
2858:
2685:
2164:
2074:
1988:
1631:
1601:
1473:
655:
750:
3279:
3148:
2978:
2705:
2605:
2415:
2291:
2204:
2169:
2094:
2064:
1928:
1762:
1752:
1701:
1528:
1513:
1438:
1210:
1060:
903:
690:
635:
560:
490:
470:
2194:
2089:
2054:
883:
3254:
3068:
2983:
2745:
2690:
2610:
2565:
2520:
2515:
2400:
2234:
2029:
1737:
1558:
1338:
1313:
1220:
1215:
1095:
725:
640:
555:
3249:
2445:
2129:
3305:
3078:
2958:
2838:
2813:
2640:
2276:
2239:
2229:
1832:
1772:
1626:
923:
898:
853:
705:
680:
670:
645:
329:
References should present information fairly and faithfully, use quotations in context, and include specific line citations.
3198:
3013:
2898:
2823:
2710:
2630:
2600:
2450:
2069:
2039:
2003:
1893:
1757:
1676:
1458:
1323:
1288:
1135:
893:
843:
838:
565:
455:
103:
1621:
808:
3300:
2888:
2883:
2843:
2828:
2818:
2695:
2540:
1948:
1938:
1837:
1646:
1508:
793:
665:
3346:
3274:
3231:
3043:
2908:
2808:
2768:
2725:
2670:
2660:
2655:
2625:
2460:
2435:
2420:
2375:
2261:
1983:
1923:
1656:
1493:
1428:
1423:
1413:
1165:
788:
540:
522:
483:
2948:
2903:
2266:
2139:
2099:
1903:
1641:
1170:
615:
3178:
3118:
3093:
3033:
2943:
2938:
2525:
2342:
2044:
2034:
1822:
1817:
1235:
908:
878:
710:
252:
a properly attributed quote from another author, especially if it adds to the value of a
Knowledge (XXG) article.
3138:
3088:
2868:
2863:
2833:
2322:
2286:
2281:
1978:
1782:
1616:
1140:
973:
948:
823:
450:
107:
3133:
2700:
2555:
1968:
1963:
1747:
1666:
1523:
1185:
86:
rights of the sources they draw upon when they create and improve encyclopedia pages. This includes avoiding
590:
460:
3073:
2535:
2332:
2256:
1120:
1065:
1050:
580:
3173:
2783:
2352:
2327:
2306:
1686:
1318:
1110:
675:
44:
83:
2347:
2337:
2251:
2224:
1488:
740:
119:
This sort of arrangement exists because it owes itself to the collaborative nature of Knowledge (XXG).
54:
82:
Knowledge (XXG) editors have a responsibility to uphold the integrity of Knowledge (XXG) and respect
2803:
1767:
1606:
1503:
700:
445:
106:. Many new editors make honest mistakes about how to edit Knowledge (XXG) correctly. Most do not
1943:
1933:
1842:
506:
32:
350:
1696:
164:
A single unsourced statement may not be academic dishonesty. What needs to be established is a
135:
The following criteria should be considered before any accusations of academic dishonest arise.
2968:
2913:
2059:
1998:
1298:
420:
387:
200:
270:
278:
204:
178:
338:
3340:
2849:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
47:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
408:
281:. If you borrow an idea from another source, it MUST be properly attributed.
87:
148:
BOTH on the article talk page, and on the talk page of the user in question.
412:
91:
2050:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
475:
1454:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
345:
would normally cite a modern edition rather than an archival quarto.
2736:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
333:
desirable, discuss the idea in advance on the article's talk page.
919:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
275:
no writing on Knowledge (XXG) is the original idea of its editors
3229:
2766:
2373:
1579:
520:
479:
207:(months to a year) to permanent banning should be considered.
18:
2616:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
1788:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1256:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
319:
This does not make violations of plagiarism any less serious
269:
Knowledge (XXG) does NOT publish original thought. It is a
2145:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
1954:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1549:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
889:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
601:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
123:
confuse the collaborative nature of Knowledge (XXG) as a
2989:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
144:
their references and must be held to such a standard.
2999:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
69:
62:
2551:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2185:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
366:
seems desirable, propose the change on the talk page.
2297:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
934:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
151:
Users that have substantial edits on Knowledge (XXG)
2741:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
3288:
3242:
2315:
2022:
1886:
1720:
1592:
1352:
1279:
774:
533:
3260:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3039:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
661:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
185:Criterion 4: Unrepentance on the part of an editor
1231:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
523:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
1384:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1329:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1081:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
203:of articles in question, to medium-to-long term
3059:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
2789:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2466:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1106:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
611:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
2486:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1652:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1419:Counting and sorting are not original research
3313:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
2929:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
1449:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
731:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
491:
8:
2979:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
1743:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1469:How to save an article proposed for deletion
746:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
721:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
686:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
2511:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
3239:
3226:
3204:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
2776:
2763:
2591:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2546:News coverage does not decrease notability
2456:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2406:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
2383:
2370:
1589:
1576:
1399:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1374:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
530:
517:
498:
484:
476:
3099:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1389:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1009:Identifying and using independent sources
127:to copy and borrow from outside sources.
3265:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2426:Big events make key participants notable
1873:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
1251:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
989:Formatting bilateral relations templates
94:, and presenting appropriate citations.
41:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
2676:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2581:Notability is not a level playing field
2496:How the presumption of notability works
1612:Contributing to complicated discussions
1464:How the presumption of notability works
984:Formatting bilateral relations articles
799:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
466:Knowledge (XXG):Liar Liar Pants on Fire
3209:You should not write meaningless lists
2506:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
1813:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1554:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1379:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
944:Don't hope the house will build itself
551:All Five Pillars are equally important
172:Criterion 3: Potential for controversy
2636:One sentence does not an article make
2586:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2302:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2215:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
1733:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1672:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1304:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1246:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
1071:Minors and persons judged incompetent
834:An unfinished house is a real problem
819:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
621:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
7:
3189:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
3169:Things that should not be surprising
2864:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2190:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2135:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2120:Don't call people by their real name
1868:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
1798:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1206:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
471:Knowledge (XXG):Do not create hoaxes
131:Obvious cases of academic dishonesty
3064:No one cares about your garage band
3049:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
2716:What is and is not routine coverage
2561:No one cares about your garage band
2481:Existence does not prove notability
1899:Assume the assumption of good faith
1828:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1682:Relationships with academic editors
1544:Why was the page I created deleted?
1539:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
979:Featured articles may have problems
766:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
3109:Please do not murder the newcomers
2666:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2150:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
1364:Adjectives in your recommendations
1241:What an article should not include
1131:The problem with elegant variation
939:Don't get hung up on minor details
756:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
357:New edits to previously cited text
45:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
3159:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
2731:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
2431:Businesses with a single location
1712:You have a right to remain silent
1161:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1116:Potential, not just current state
1046:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
456:Knowledge (XXG):Gaming the system
156:should enter into consideration.
2180:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2175:Don't ignore community consensus
1409:Confusing arguments mean nothing
160:Criterion 2: Number of instances
114:Collaboration at Knowledge (XXG)
22:
16:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
2681:Sources must be out-of-universe
2396:All high schools can be notable
1793:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1479:Identifying blatant advertising
1261:The world will not end tomorrow
1091:Not everything needs a template
1004:How to write a featured article
606:Editors will sometimes be wrong
102:First and foremost, we need to
3270:Avoid writing redundant essays
2919:Don't stuff beans up your nose
2794:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2621:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2571:Notability cannot be purchased
2531:Masking the lack of notability
1294:Copyediting reception sections
1196:Temporary versions of articles
1126:Principle of Some Astonishment
914:Creating controversial content
814:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
761:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
238:Rights of the copyright holder
139:Criterion 1: Editor experience
1:
3296:About policies and guidelines
2411:Articles with a single source
2035:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
1858:Two wrongs don't make a right
1848:The rules of polite discourse
1778:It's not the end of the world
1086:Not everything needs a navbox
954:Don't "teach the controversy"
626:Here to build an encyclopedia
279:reliable, third party sources
3184:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
2879:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
2799:Alternatives to edit warring
1662:Maintaining a friendly space
451:Knowledge (XXG):Honor system
325:Appropriate use of citations
3164:The Five Pillars of Untruth
2954:Editing under the influence
2491:Google searches and numbers
2210:Don't template the regulars
2125:Don't call the kettle black
1919:Be excellent to one another
1803:Revert notification opt-out
1707:We are all Wikipedians here
1156:Put a little effort into it
1101:Obtain peer review comments
1056:Introduction to structurism
994:Fruit of the poisonous tree
964:Editors are not mindreaders
869:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
859:Beef up that first revision
631:Leave it to the experienced
596:Don't search for objections
194:What to do about dishonesty
3363:
3194:Why not create an account?
3129:Requirements for adminship
3004:How to vandalize correctly
2974:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
2934:Don't delete the main page
2854:Avoid using preview button
2576:Notability comparison test
2160:Don't fight fire with fire
2155:Don't eat the troll's food
2115:Don't call a spade a spade
2110:Don't bludgeon the process
1959:Encourage full discussions
1808:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1444:Don't attack the nominator
1404:But there must be sources!
1226:Try not to leave it a stub
1176:Source your plot summaries
52:
3238:
3225:
3144:Sarcasm is really helpful
3084:Notability is not eternal
3009:How to win a citation war
2779:
2775:
2762:
2471:Every snowflake is unique
2391:Advanced source searching
2386:
2382:
2369:
2272:No, you can't have a pony
2220:Do not insult the vandals
2080:Don't be high-maintenance
1637:Encouraging the newcomers
1588:
1575:
1181:Specialized-style fallacy
1146:Pruning article revisions
974:Endorsements (commercial)
959:Editing on mobile devices
864:Blind men and an elephant
839:Articles have a half-life
586:Dissent is not disloyalty
556:Avoid vague introductions
529:
516:
461:Knowledge (XXG):Don't lie
3154:The Night Before Wikimas
3019:Ignore every single rule
2994:How to get away with UPE
2874:Before they were notable
2646:Overreliance upon Google
2441:Common sourcing mistakes
2014:Settle the process first
1974:Imagine others complexly
1878:Writing for the opponent
1853:There is no common sense
1534:Unopposed AFD discussion
1519:Relisting can be abusive
1394:Avoid repeated arguments
999:Give an article a chance
849:Avoid mission statements
809:Advanced text formatting
804:Advanced article editing
751:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
736:The rules are principles
696:Product, process, policy
546:Articles must be written
3289:Policies and guidelines
3124:Requests for medication
3104:Please bite the newbies
3029:Mess with the templates
2596:Notability means impact
2130:Don't call things cruft
2105:Don't be the Fun Police
1914:Avoid the word "vandal"
1863:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
1728:A thank you never hurts
1499:Liar liar pants on fire
1434:Deletion is not cleanup
1344:Writing better articles
1334:Write the article first
1309:Gender-neutral language
1281:Writing article content
1271:Writing better articles
1266:Write the article first
1201:Tertiary-source fallacy
969:Encourage the newcomers
929:Dictionaries as sources
874:Build content to endure
446:Knowledge (XXG):Honesty
3347:Knowledge (XXG) essays
3318:Policy writing is hard
3024:Is that even an essay?
2721:What notability is not
2476:Existence ≠Notability
2085:Don't be inconsiderate
2009:Read before commenting
1994:Mind your own business
1909:Avoid personal remarks
1484:Identifying test edits
829:A navbox on every page
784:100K featured articles
581:Concede lost arguments
576:Competence is required
507:Knowledge (XXG) essays
3114:Pledge of Tranquility
2859:Avoid using wikilinks
2686:Subjective importance
2200:Don't spite your face
1989:Keep it down to earth
1753:Beware of the tigers!
1692:Too long; didn't read
1632:Edit at your own pace
1602:Accepting other users
1369:AfD is not a war zone
716:There is no seniority
656:Neutrality of sources
411:cites her opinion of
317:against plagiarism.
84:intellectual property
43:, as it has not been
3280:Quote your own essay
3149:Sausages for tasting
2924:Don't-give-a-fuckism
2894:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
2706:Vanispamcruftisement
2606:Notability sub-pages
2416:Avoid template creep
2376:Essays on notability
2292:There are no oracles
2075:Don't be a WikiBigot
1929:Call a spade a spade
1702:Unblock perspectives
1529:The Heymann Standard
1514:Overzealous deletion
1474:I just don't like it
1211:There is no deadline
1076:"Murder of" articles
904:Common-style fallacy
776:Article construction
691:Process is important
636:Levels of competence
561:Be a reliable source
3069:No one really cares
2984:Go ahead, vandalize
2746:Two prongs of merit
2691:Third-party sources
2611:Notabilitymandering
2566:No one really cares
2521:Inherent notability
2516:Independent sources
2401:Alternative outlets
2235:Nationalist editing
2205:Don't take the bait
2170:Don't help too much
2095:Don't be prejudiced
2065:Don't be an ostrich
2030:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
1763:Deletion as revenge
1738:Advice for hotheads
1559:No Encyclopedic Use
1439:Does deletion help?
1339:Writing about women
1221:The deadline is now
1216:There is a deadline
1096:Nothing is in stone
726:Tendentious editing
641:Levels of consensus
166:pattern of behavior
98:Assuming good faith
3079:No sorcery threats
2959:Embrace Stop Signs
2839:Assume good wraith
2814:Anti-Wikipedianism
2651:Perennial websites
2641:Other stuff exists
2277:Passive aggression
2240:No angry mastodons
2230:Hate is disruptive
2090:Don't be obnoxious
2055:Don't be a fanatic
1833:Most ideas are bad
1773:Forgive and forget
1582:Essays on civility
1191:Run an edit-a-thon
924:Deprecated sources
899:Citation underkill
884:Chesterton's fence
854:Be neutral in form
706:Reasonability rule
671:Oversimplification
646:Most ideas are bad
370:Altering footnotes
351:Bible translations
308:Harm of plagiarism
108:cite their sources
70:WP:EDITORINTEGRITY
3334:
3333:
3330:
3329:
3326:
3325:
3221:
3220:
3217:
3216:
3199:Yes legal threats
3014:Ignore all essays
2899:Complete bollocks
2824:Asshole John rule
2758:
2757:
2754:
2753:
2711:What BLP1E is not
2631:One hundred words
2601:Notability points
2365:
2364:
2361:
2360:
2165:Don't give a fuck
2040:Civil POV pushing
2004:Mutual withdrawal
1894:Assume good faith
1758:Civility warnings
1677:Please say please
1627:Editors' pronouns
1571:
1570:
1567:
1566:
1459:Follow the leader
1324:Use our own words
1289:Avoid thread mode
1136:Pro and con lists
894:Citation overkill
844:Autosizing images
566:Civil POV pushing
407:An article about
256:Attempts to evade
179:Original Research
104:assume good faith
80:
79:
3354:
3275:Finding an essay
3240:
3227:
2889:Butterfly effect
2884:Boston Tea Party
2844:Assume stupidity
2829:Assume bad faith
2819:Articlecountitis
2777:
2764:
2696:Trivial mentions
2541:Minimum coverage
2384:
2371:
2070:Don't be ashamed
1949:Discussing cruft
1939:Deny recognition
1838:Nothing is clear
1647:Expect no thanks
1590:
1577:
1509:Nothing is clear
1356:deleting content
1039:Tertiary sources
794:Acronym overkill
666:The one question
531:
518:
511:
500:
493:
486:
477:
285:Chain of sources
72:
65:
26:
25:
19:
3362:
3361:
3357:
3356:
3355:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3337:
3336:
3335:
3322:
3284:
3255:Value of essays
3234:
3213:
3044:Legal vandalism
2909:Counting juntas
2809:Anti-Wikipedian
2771:
2769:Humorous essays
2750:
2726:What to include
2671:Run-of-the-mill
2661:Read the source
2626:Offline sources
2421:Bare notability
2378:
2357:
2311:
2262:No Confederates
2060:Don't be a jerk
2018:
1984:Keep it concise
1924:Beyond civility
1882:
1716:
1657:How to be civil
1622:Don't retaliate
1584:
1563:
1494:Keep it concise
1429:Delete the junk
1424:Delete or merge
1414:Content removal
1348:
1314:Myth vs fiction
1275:
1166:Robotic editing
1029:Science sources
1024:Primary sources
1014:History sources
789:Abandoned stubs
770:
541:Article content
525:
512:
504:
442:
405:
392:
380:
372:
359:
327:
310:
296:
287:
271:tertiary source
267:
258:
249:
240:
226:
213:
201:semi-protection
196:
187:
174:
162:
141:
133:
116:
100:
76:
75:
68:
61:
57:
49:
48:
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
3360:
3358:
3350:
3349:
3339:
3338:
3332:
3331:
3328:
3327:
3324:
3323:
3321:
3320:
3315:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3303:
3292:
3290:
3286:
3285:
3283:
3282:
3277:
3272:
3267:
3262:
3257:
3252:
3246:
3244:
3236:
3235:
3230:
3223:
3222:
3219:
3218:
3215:
3214:
3212:
3211:
3206:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3096:
3091:
3086:
3081:
3076:
3071:
3066:
3061:
3056:
3051:
3046:
3041:
3036:
3031:
3026:
3021:
3016:
3011:
3006:
3001:
2996:
2991:
2986:
2981:
2976:
2971:
2966:
2961:
2956:
2951:
2949:Editsummarisis
2946:
2941:
2936:
2931:
2926:
2921:
2916:
2911:
2906:
2904:Counting forks
2901:
2896:
2891:
2886:
2881:
2876:
2871:
2866:
2861:
2856:
2851:
2846:
2841:
2836:
2831:
2826:
2821:
2816:
2811:
2806:
2801:
2796:
2791:
2786:
2780:
2773:
2772:
2767:
2760:
2759:
2756:
2755:
2752:
2751:
2749:
2748:
2743:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2688:
2683:
2678:
2673:
2668:
2663:
2658:
2653:
2648:
2643:
2638:
2633:
2628:
2623:
2618:
2613:
2608:
2603:
2598:
2593:
2588:
2583:
2578:
2573:
2568:
2563:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2543:
2538:
2533:
2528:
2523:
2518:
2513:
2508:
2503:
2498:
2493:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2473:
2468:
2463:
2461:Don't cite GNG
2458:
2453:
2448:
2443:
2438:
2436:But it's true!
2433:
2428:
2423:
2418:
2413:
2408:
2403:
2398:
2393:
2387:
2380:
2379:
2374:
2367:
2366:
2363:
2362:
2359:
2358:
2356:
2355:
2350:
2345:
2340:
2335:
2333:WikiHarassment
2330:
2325:
2319:
2317:
2313:
2312:
2310:
2309:
2304:
2299:
2294:
2289:
2284:
2279:
2274:
2269:
2267:No queerphobia
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2237:
2232:
2227:
2222:
2217:
2212:
2207:
2202:
2197:
2192:
2187:
2182:
2177:
2172:
2167:
2162:
2157:
2152:
2147:
2142:
2137:
2132:
2127:
2122:
2117:
2112:
2107:
2102:
2097:
2092:
2087:
2082:
2077:
2072:
2067:
2062:
2057:
2052:
2047:
2042:
2037:
2032:
2026:
2024:
2020:
2019:
2017:
2016:
2011:
2006:
2001:
1996:
1991:
1986:
1981:
1976:
1971:
1966:
1961:
1956:
1951:
1946:
1941:
1936:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1904:Assume no clue
1901:
1896:
1890:
1888:
1884:
1883:
1881:
1880:
1875:
1870:
1865:
1860:
1855:
1850:
1845:
1840:
1835:
1830:
1825:
1820:
1815:
1810:
1805:
1800:
1795:
1790:
1785:
1780:
1775:
1770:
1765:
1760:
1755:
1750:
1745:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1724:
1722:
1718:
1717:
1715:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1642:Enjoy yourself
1639:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1604:
1598:
1596:
1586:
1585:
1580:
1573:
1572:
1569:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1562:
1561:
1556:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1496:
1491:
1486:
1481:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1350:
1349:
1347:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1285:
1283:
1277:
1276:
1274:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1178:
1173:
1171:Sham consensus
1168:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1006:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
916:
911:
906:
901:
896:
891:
886:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
851:
846:
841:
836:
831:
826:
821:
816:
811:
806:
801:
796:
791:
786:
780:
778:
772:
771:
769:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
673:
668:
663:
658:
653:
648:
643:
638:
633:
628:
623:
618:
616:Explanationism
613:
608:
603:
598:
593:
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
563:
558:
553:
548:
543:
537:
535:
527:
526:
521:
514:
513:
505:
503:
502:
495:
488:
480:
474:
473:
468:
463:
458:
453:
448:
441:
438:
404:
401:
391:
385:
379:
376:
371:
368:
358:
355:
326:
323:
309:
306:
295:
292:
286:
283:
266:
263:
257:
254:
248:
245:
239:
236:
225:
224:Substantiality
222:
212:
209:
195:
192:
186:
183:
173:
170:
161:
158:
140:
137:
132:
129:
115:
112:
99:
96:
78:
77:
74:
73:
66:
58:
53:
50:
38:
37:
29:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3359:
3348:
3345:
3344:
3342:
3319:
3316:
3314:
3311:
3307:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3298:
3297:
3294:
3293:
3291:
3287:
3281:
3278:
3276:
3273:
3271:
3268:
3266:
3263:
3261:
3258:
3256:
3253:
3251:
3248:
3247:
3245:
3241:
3237:
3233:
3228:
3224:
3210:
3207:
3205:
3202:
3200:
3197:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3179:Watchlistitis
3177:
3175:
3174:The WikiBible
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3119:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3095:
3094:Play the game
3092:
3090:
3087:
3085:
3082:
3080:
3077:
3075:
3072:
3070:
3067:
3065:
3062:
3060:
3057:
3055:
3052:
3050:
3047:
3045:
3042:
3040:
3037:
3035:
3034:My local pond
3032:
3030:
3027:
3025:
3022:
3020:
3017:
3015:
3012:
3010:
3007:
3005:
3002:
3000:
2997:
2995:
2992:
2990:
2987:
2985:
2982:
2980:
2977:
2975:
2972:
2970:
2967:
2965:
2962:
2960:
2957:
2955:
2952:
2950:
2947:
2945:
2944:Edits Per Day
2942:
2940:
2939:Editcountitis
2937:
2935:
2932:
2930:
2927:
2925:
2922:
2920:
2917:
2915:
2912:
2910:
2907:
2905:
2902:
2900:
2897:
2895:
2892:
2890:
2887:
2885:
2882:
2880:
2877:
2875:
2872:
2870:
2867:
2865:
2862:
2860:
2857:
2855:
2852:
2850:
2847:
2845:
2842:
2840:
2837:
2835:
2832:
2830:
2827:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2817:
2815:
2812:
2810:
2807:
2805:
2802:
2800:
2797:
2795:
2792:
2790:
2787:
2785:
2782:
2781:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2765:
2761:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2689:
2687:
2684:
2682:
2679:
2677:
2674:
2672:
2669:
2667:
2664:
2662:
2659:
2657:
2654:
2652:
2649:
2647:
2644:
2642:
2639:
2637:
2634:
2632:
2629:
2627:
2624:
2622:
2619:
2617:
2614:
2612:
2609:
2607:
2604:
2602:
2599:
2597:
2594:
2592:
2589:
2587:
2584:
2582:
2579:
2577:
2574:
2572:
2569:
2567:
2564:
2562:
2559:
2557:
2554:
2552:
2549:
2547:
2544:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2534:
2532:
2529:
2527:
2526:Insignificant
2524:
2522:
2519:
2517:
2514:
2512:
2509:
2507:
2504:
2502:
2499:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2489:
2487:
2484:
2482:
2479:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2469:
2467:
2464:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2447:
2444:
2442:
2439:
2437:
2434:
2432:
2429:
2427:
2424:
2422:
2419:
2417:
2414:
2412:
2409:
2407:
2404:
2402:
2399:
2397:
2394:
2392:
2389:
2388:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2372:
2368:
2354:
2351:
2349:
2346:
2344:
2343:WikiLawyering
2341:
2339:
2336:
2334:
2331:
2329:
2326:
2324:
2321:
2320:
2318:
2316:WikiRelations
2314:
2308:
2305:
2303:
2300:
2298:
2295:
2293:
2290:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2280:
2278:
2275:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2246:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2213:
2211:
2208:
2206:
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2193:
2191:
2188:
2186:
2183:
2181:
2178:
2176:
2173:
2171:
2168:
2166:
2163:
2161:
2158:
2156:
2153:
2151:
2148:
2146:
2143:
2141:
2140:Don't cry COI
2138:
2136:
2133:
2131:
2128:
2126:
2123:
2121:
2118:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2108:
2106:
2103:
2101:
2100:Don't be rude
2098:
2096:
2093:
2091:
2088:
2086:
2083:
2081:
2078:
2076:
2073:
2071:
2068:
2066:
2063:
2061:
2058:
2056:
2053:
2051:
2048:
2046:
2045:Cyberbullying
2043:
2041:
2038:
2036:
2033:
2031:
2028:
2027:
2025:
2021:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2007:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1997:
1995:
1992:
1990:
1987:
1985:
1982:
1980:
1977:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1965:
1962:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1952:
1950:
1947:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1937:
1935:
1932:
1930:
1927:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1891:
1889:
1885:
1879:
1876:
1874:
1871:
1869:
1866:
1864:
1861:
1859:
1856:
1854:
1851:
1849:
1846:
1844:
1841:
1839:
1836:
1834:
1831:
1829:
1826:
1824:
1823:The last word
1821:
1819:
1818:The grey zone
1816:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1799:
1796:
1794:
1791:
1789:
1786:
1784:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1764:
1761:
1759:
1756:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1736:
1734:
1731:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1723:
1719:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1680:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1610:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1597:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1578:
1574:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1522:
1520:
1517:
1515:
1512:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1502:
1500:
1497:
1495:
1492:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1482:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1465:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1357:
1351:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1286:
1284:
1282:
1278:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1236:Walled garden
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1061:Mine a source
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
915:
912:
910:
909:Concept cloud
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
882:
880:
879:Cherrypicking
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
837:
835:
832:
830:
827:
825:
822:
820:
817:
815:
812:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
797:
795:
792:
790:
787:
785:
782:
781:
779:
777:
773:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
711:Systemic bias
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
627:
624:
622:
619:
617:
614:
612:
609:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
538:
536:
532:
528:
524:
519:
515:
508:
501:
496:
494:
489:
487:
482:
481:
478:
472:
469:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
447:
444:
443:
439:
437:
433:
431:
430:she was wrong
427:
426:she was right
422:
418:
414:
410:
402:
400:
398:
390:and citations
389:
386:
384:
377:
375:
369:
367:
363:
356:
354:
352:
346:
342:
340:
334:
330:
324:
322:
320:
316:
307:
305:
302:
293:
291:
284:
282:
280:
276:
272:
264:
262:
255:
253:
246:
244:
237:
235:
232:
223:
221:
219:
210:
208:
206:
202:
193:
191:
184:
182:
180:
171:
169:
167:
159:
157:
154:
149:
145:
138:
136:
130:
128:
126:
120:
113:
111:
109:
105:
97:
95:
93:
90:, respecting
89:
85:
71:
67:
64:
60:
59:
56:
51:
46:
42:
36:
34:
28:
21:
20:
3243:About essays
3232:About essays
3139:Rouge editor
3089:Oops Defense
2869:Barnstaritis
2834:Assume faith
2656:Pokémon test
2501:High Schools
2323:WikiBullying
2287:Superhatting
2282:POV railroad
1979:Just drop it
1783:Nobody cares
1617:Divisiveness
1141:Printability
1034:Style guides
824:Amnesia test
681:Paraphrasing
434:
429:
425:
416:
415:. It would
409:Helen Keller
406:
396:
393:
381:
373:
364:
360:
347:
343:
335:
331:
328:
318:
314:
311:
300:
297:
288:
274:
268:
259:
250:
241:
230:
227:
217:
214:
197:
188:
175:
165:
163:
152:
150:
146:
142:
134:
125:free-for-all
124:
121:
117:
101:
81:
30:
3250:Essay guide
3134:Rouge admin
2701:Video links
2556:No big loss
2245:just madmen
2195:Don't shout
1969:How to lose
1964:Get over it
1748:Be the glue
1667:Negotiation
1524:Relist bias
1354:Removing or
1186:Stub Makers
1019:Law sources
949:Don't panic
397:editorially
31:This is an
3306:Guidelines
3074:No, really
3054:LTTAUTMAOK
2536:Make stubs
2257:No racists
1999:Say "MOBY"
1721:Philosophy
1594:The basics
1151:Publicists
1121:Presentism
1066:Merge Test
1051:Inaccuracy
534:Philosophy
265:Plagiarism
247:Quotations
88:plagiarism
63:WP:EDITINT
2784:Adminitis
2353:WikiPeace
2328:WikiCrime
2307:UPPERCASE
1687:Thank you
1319:Proseline
1111:Permastub
676:Paradoxes
591:Don't lie
413:socialism
211:Copyright
92:copyright
55:Shortcuts
3341:Category
3301:Policies
2451:Coatrack
2348:WikiLove
2338:WikiHate
2252:No Nazis
2225:Griefing
1489:Immunity
741:Trifecta
571:Cohesion
440:See also
205:blocking
2964:Emerson
2804:ANI flu
1768:Failure
1607:Apology
1504:Nothing
701:Purpose
421:WP:NPOV
403:Example
378:Example
294:Example
2446:Clones
2023:Don'ts
1944:Desist
1934:Candor
1843:Reader
419:serve
362:text.
153:should
1697:Truce
218:legal
33:essay
2969:Fart
2914:Crap
1299:Coup
651:Need
388:NPOV
339:WP:V
301:were
1887:Dos
510:(?)
428:or
417:not
315:law
3343::
432:.
353:.
341:.
231:or
499:e
492:t
485:v
35:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.