152:. I was poking around Afc when I saw this submission come in, and thought it might give me some valued experience at article creation and building. I took the original submission and through my own research, expanded it from stub-class to start-class. I plan on doing more to the article, so to help remind me (and others), I created a to-do list for the article with changes I need to make to it.
270:
An editor asks you to mediate in a dispute that has gone from being a content dispute to an edit war (but not necessarily a revert war), with hostile language in edit summaries (that are not personal attacks). One involved party welcomes the involvement of an admin, but the other seems to ignore you.
387:
At times, administrators have experienced, or have been close to burnout due to a mixture of stress and conflict inherent in a collaborative web site of this nature. Do you feel able to justify yourself under pressure, and to not permit stress to become overwhelming and cause undesirable or confused
243:
but may help myself or other voters decide. Some of these are not specifically related to your areas of interest. If I have already voted please feel free to ignore these questions though other editors might find them to be of use. You can also remove the questions you don't want to touch if you
279:
as a third party. Would you respect the other admin's decisions, or would you continue to engage in conversation (over email or IRC) and submit a comment/statement to the RFAR? Let's say the ArbCom rejects the case. What would you do
188:
That would be due to the almost 200 editors I have welcomed, along with the many vandalism warnings I have left on my vandal-fighting hunts. If I happen to see a sharedip I can tag, I add that as well when applicable.
162:
No conflicts that I recognize as such. If I find myself getting stressed here, I put the keyboard down and walk away for a bit to settle down as warring with words is never, and can not amount to, good.
63:
I understand that editor reviews are the first step in the admin path. Someday I would like to become an administrator, but not before I and the community feel that I am ready to handle the mop.
159:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
368:
Do you believe there is a minimum number of people who need to express their opinions in order to reasonably close an AfD? If so, what is that number? What about RfDs and CfDs?
275:
as they do not think it would solve anything. Just as you are about to approach the user ignoring you, another admin blocks them both for edit warring and sends the case to
60:
I am seeking a review to see how the community views my contributions to date so that I can see whatever weaknesses I may have and working on fixing them.
103:
You may wish to be adopted or just get in contact with a current admin to get tips and to further improve your chances of getting adminship.
175:
115:
133:
251:
You find out that an editor, who's well-known and liked in the community, has been using sockpuppets abusively. What would you do?
54:
345:
otherwise. The RCU returns inconclusive, what do you do? Is your answer any different if the two possibilities are between
32:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
426:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
149:
168:
108:
84:
57:) I have had an account since September, 2006, but have only really been active since January of this year.
17:
213:
318:
Under what circumstances would you indefinitely block a user without any prior direction from Arb Com?
145:
Of your contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
194:
68:
48:
198:
121:
72:
341:
if one counted certain votes that you suspect are sockpuppets/meatpuppets and would be
276:
230:
272:
190:
64:
44:
226:
221:
217:
234:
94:
I glad you add edit summaries makes life a lot easier for other editors.
299:
If you could change any one thing about
Knowledge what would it be?
100:
If you want to get more into admin look into anti-vandalism.
97:
You seem to have more user talk edits than main space edits.
167:
Why do you have such a high 'user talk page' edit count? (
337:Suppose you are closing an AfD where it would be
148:I would have to say the first article I created,
8:
90:You seem dedicated enough. A few comments:
407:Why do you want to be an administrator?
7:
28:The following discussion is closed.
132:View this user's edit count using
24:
422:The discussion above is closed.
134:Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
1:
150:Frank Browne (photographer)
441:
424:Please do not modify it.
271:They have both rejected
212:Optional questions from
30:Please do not modify it.
199:20:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
122:20:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
73:19:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Editor review
216:that he lifted form
170:Gaia Octavia Agrippa
110:Gaia Octavia Agrippa
85:Gaia Octavia Agrippa
220:who got them from
31:
214:User:Dlohcierekim
29:
432:
178:
171:
118:
111:
440:
439:
435:
434:
433:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
209:
207:Benon questions
180:
176:
169:
120:
116:
109:
42:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
438:
436:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
409:
408:
401:
400:
399:
398:
390:
389:
381:
380:
379:
378:
370:
369:
362:
361:
360:
359:
331:
330:
329:
328:
320:
319:
312:
311:
310:
309:
301:
300:
293:
292:
291:
290:
282:
281:
264:
263:
262:
261:
253:
252:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
183:
182:
174:
165:
164:
163:
157:
155:
154:
153:
137:
136:
114:
105:
104:
101:
98:
95:
88:
87:
41:
36:
35:
26:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
437:
425:
416:
413:
412:
411:
410:
406:
403:
402:
397:
394:
393:
392:
391:
386:
383:
382:
377:
374:
373:
372:
371:
367:
364:
363:
358:
355:
354:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
333:
332:
327:
324:
323:
322:
321:
317:
314:
313:
308:
305:
304:
303:
302:
298:
295:
294:
289:
286:
285:
284:
283:
278:
274:
269:
266:
265:
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
247:
246:
245:
242:
241:100% optional
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
223:
219:
215:
206:
200:
196:
192:
187:
186:
185:
184:
179:
172:
166:
161:
160:
158:
156:
151:
147:
146:
144:
143:
142:
141:
135:
131:
130:
129:
128:
124:
123:
119:
112:
102:
99:
96:
93:
92:
91:
86:
82:
81:
80:
79:
75:
74:
70:
66:
61:
58:
56:
53:
50:
46:
40:
37:
33:
19:
423:
414:
404:
395:
384:
375:
365:
356:
350:
347:no consensus
346:
342:
338:
334:
325:
315:
306:
296:
287:
267:
258:
248:
240:
225:
211:
210:
139:
138:
126:
125:
106:
89:
77:
76:
62:
59:
51:
43:
38:
27:
239:. They are
107:Good luck.
388:behaviour?
231:Rob Church
218:User:Benon
83:Review by
140:Questions
127:Comments
191:ArcAngel
78:Reviews
65:ArcAngel
55:contribs
45:ArcAngel
39:ArcAngel
277:WP:RFAR
244:like.
227:JoshuaZ
351:delete
343:delete
273:WP:RFC
222:Tawker
280:then?
16:<
349:and
339:keep
235:NSLE
195:talk
177:Sign
117:Sign
69:talk
49:talk
405:11.
385:10.
233:,
396:A-
376:A-
366:9.
357:A-
353:?
335:8.
326:A-
316:7.
307:A-
297:6.
288:A-
268:5.
259:A-
249:4.
229:,
224:,
197:)
173:|
113:|
71:)
415:A
193:(
181:)
67:(
52:·
47:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.