Knowledge

:Editor review/Derild4921 (2) - Knowledge

Source 📝

202: 197:
I enjoy working with you, but I don't have time for a full review. I just want to mention that you may wish to brush up your prose style. I admit that learning to write with great formal style takes time, but if you were to become more proficient at it, your GAs would probably pass more easily (and I
133:
moment and completely rewrote the page. However, some inaccuracies were added in and the main editor of the previous version wanted the article back to their version which while more accurate was disorganized and full of fluff. Another editor helped to crease the folds and remove the inaccuracies. I
121:
Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
134:
admit it was a moment of being too bold and will not try to rewrite a page when a previous editor worked hard on the previous version. More information can be seen on the talk page.
219: 90:
I'd say I'm quite balanced between content and maintained work, but I usually work with content. I've had three good articles so far.
50: 55:
I've just hit 6000 edits and wanted some feedback. Last time I had a review was half a year ago when I just had reached 600 edits.
242: 66: 44: 114:
which I started working on a month ago and hope to take to GA and then FA. Sometimes I work in new page patrol and CSD.
278: 231:
Yeah, I've tried to improve, but its hard. Before GA reviews I usually send it over to GOCE for a cleanup. Thanks!
71: 91: 87:
What are your primary contributions to Knowledge? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
95: 17: 214: 103: 161: 107: 284: 237: 61: 38: 289: 252: 226: 188: 166: 76: 209: 111: 152: 274: 232: 126: 99: 56: 33: 262: 180: 130: 174: 267: 125:
I haven't been in many disputes, but a big one happened at the article
171:
That was not even a proper attempt at a review, I'm rehasing this. —
149:
see some concern with your CSDs at a quick glance, but I
106:
and other articles I helped improve which are listed
102:. Besides these articles I have a current GA nom 151:think you are a good-faith editor otherwise. 8: 198:would spend less time cleaning up after you 7: 199: 110:. My best article work I think is 24: 261:My best advice is... go back to 200: 1: 227:22:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC) 77:17:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 189:03:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 167:00:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 290:02:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 253:18:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC) 306: 92:Into the Wild (Warriors) 96:Warriors (novel series) 18:Knowledge:Editor review 104:Seekers (novel series) 176:Ancient Apparition 163:want to be chilly? 287: 164: 112:When You Reach Me 297: 283: 281: 270: 250: 245: 240: 235: 224: 222: 217: 212: 205: 204: 203: 187: 183: 177: 162: 159: 74: 69: 64: 59: 54: 305: 304: 300: 299: 298: 296: 295: 294: 279: 268: 248: 243: 238: 233: 220: 215: 210: 208: 201: 181: 175: 172: 153: 127:Tunnels (novel) 100:Tunnels (novel) 72: 67: 62: 57: 36: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 303: 301: 293: 292: 258: 257: 256: 255: 194: 193: 192: 191: 140: 138: 137: 136: 135: 119: 117: 116: 115: 30: 28:Derild4921 (2) 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 302: 291: 286: 282: 277: 276: 272: 271: 264: 260: 259: 254: 251: 246: 241: 236: 230: 229: 228: 225: 223: 218: 213: 196: 195: 190: 186: 184: 178: 170: 169: 168: 165: 160: 158: 157: 150: 146: 145: 144: 143: 132: 129:when I had a 128: 124: 123: 120: 118: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 88: 86: 85: 84: 83: 79: 78: 75: 70: 65: 60: 52: 49: 46: 43: 40: 35: 29: 26: 19: 273: 266: 247: 207: 173: 155: 154: 148: 141: 139: 81: 80: 47: 41: 32: 27: 156:Frozen Wind 249:Review Me! 185:• 2:48pm • 182:Champagne? 34:Derild4921 288:HI AGAIN 82:Questions 142:Reviews 45:contribs 263:WP:MOTD 211:Bramble 131:be bold 275:Voting 269:Kayau 234:Derild 58:Derild 265:! :P 51:count 16:< 285:evil 216:claw 108:here 98:and 39:talk 280:IS 244:21 239:49 206:) 179:• 147:I 94:, 68:21 63:49 221:x 73:☼ 53:) 48:· 42:· 37:(

Index

Knowledge:Editor review
Derild4921 (2)
Derild4921
talk
contribs
count
Derild
49
21

17:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Into the Wild (Warriors)
Warriors (novel series)
Tunnels (novel)
Seekers (novel series)
here
When You Reach Me
Tunnels (novel)
be bold
Frozen Wind
want to be chilly?
00:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Ancient Apparition
Champagne?
03:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Bramble
claw
x
22:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Derild

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.